DOCSLIB.ORG

Research Report United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (Unhcr)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Research Report United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (Unhcr) RESEARCH REPORT UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES (UNHCR) DEVELOPING SOLUTIONS TO ERADICATE THE MALTREATMENT OF UYGHUR TURKS IN CHINA MELİKE KOCA MUNDP 2021 – Commitment to Development – Research Report Committee: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Agenda Item: Developing solutions to eradicate the maltreatment of Uyghur Turks in China Student Officer & Role: Melike Koca, Deputy Chair Basic Overview of the Issue The maltreatment of Uyghur Turks is an abuse of human rights and effectuated by the Chinese government in and around the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. There are more than 11 million Uyghur Turks in Xinjiang where unlawful acts are perpetrated by the Chinese government. These acts are labeled as ‘’genocide’’ by many human rights experts, non- governmental organizations (NGOs), government officials, and also the U.S. government. More than one million Muslims, with the majority of Uygur Turks, have been held in detention camps without any legal base by the Chinese government since 2017. The aforementioned unlawful policy has been pursued under the Xi Jinping administration of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, suppressing religious practices, severe ill-treatment, and political indoctrination are considered to be human rights abuses. There are more than 85 identified camps, where at least one million Uighurs are forced to be interned. Even though the Chinese government has abnegated the existence of camps, they have acknowledged these camps as ‘’re-education centers’’ for Uighurs after the images of camp constructions Figure 1 - Locations of "re-education camps" for Uighurs in Xinjiang, western China, also known as East Turkestan. were released. Explanation of Important Terms Ethnocide Ethnocide is the deliberate destruction of an ethnic culture (Merriam-Webster). This term is also related to the term ‘’cultural cleansing’’. Since the term ethnocide could be used in different meanings and contexts, the general approach could be interpreted as inclusion and exclusion in law and policies according to the terms anthropology. General genocide The term general genocide was first mentioned by the lawyer Raphael Lemkin in 1944. MUNDP 2021 – Commitment to Development 1 Committee: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Agenda Item: Developing solutions to eradicate the maltreatment of Uyghur Turks in China Student Officer & Role: Melike Koca, Deputy Chair General genocide is described as "acts and measures are undertaken to destroy nations' or ethnic groups' culture through spiritual, national, and cultural destruction" by the Armenian Genocide Museum. Re-education Centers The re-education camps are officially named ‘’Vocational Education and Training Centers’’ by the Chinese government. These camps were created under CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping’s administration in the Xinjiang area. It was extrapolated that over one and a half million people, including mostly Uyghurs but also Kazakhs and Kyrgyz (mainly Turkic Muslims), are being held in the aforementioned internment camps. Detailed Background of the Issue The Xinjiang Region The Xinjiang region, an autonomous territory in the Northwest of China, has borders to eight different countries, including the Russian Federation, Afghanistan, and India. It is officially known as the “Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region,” and it is home to a number of different ethnic groups - the most prominent one being the Turkic Uyghurs. Although the policy of the Chinese government is to allow ethnic groups to maintain their cultural identities, several ethnic tensions have arisen. One of the main issues in the region is the conflict between the Uyghurs and Han. In 2017, it was reported by the Human Rights Watch that the Chinese authorities have begun to operate “re-education camps” in the Xinjiang region to indoctrinate the Uyghur Turks. Various governments and human rights experts have accused the government of China of the mistreatment of the Uyghur Turks. Restrictions Imposed on the Uyghurs (1990-2017) At the beginning of 1996, Chinese authorities in Xinjiang launched the “strike hard” campaign, which included measures targeting cell phones, computers, and religious materials belonging to the Uyghurs. The measures taken were due to the growing tensions between the Uyghurs and the Han Chinese in the Xinjiang region. In addition, long beards were banned, and women were not allowed to wear veils in public places. Since these were MUNDP 2021 – Commitment to Development 2 Committee: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Agenda Item: Developing solutions to eradicate the maltreatment of Uyghur Turks in China Student Officer & Role: Melike Koca, Deputy Chair direct human rights violations, the Uyghur Turks began to protest, which resulted in arrests and executions. The campaign was relaunched in 2014 with more repressive measures. The DNA samples, iris scans, and voice samples of Uyghurs in the Xinjiang region were collected. Also, people were tracked through CCTV footage and ID cards. Even though this, again, is a direct violation of human rights, and the Chinese government has received criticism and condemnation from the international community, the government has continued with its repressive measures. Other restrictions include Uyghurs not being able to build their own mosques, fast during Ramadan, and name their children with common Muslim names. In addition, Uyghurs are not allowed to have their children attend an Islamic private school or mosques. Accusations Against the Chinese Government There are numerous specific accusations towards the government of China on the issue of Uyghur Turks. Human rights experts have demanded the International Criminal Court and United Nations Human Rights Council to investigate the internment camps in the Xinjiang region. In terms of maltreatment such as torture, forced sterilization, and forced labor, some governments and human rights experts have alleged that China is committing an “Uyghur genocide.” Torture and Mistreatment A remarkable number of human rights experts consider the Chinese re-education camps as cruel mistreatment towards the Uyghur refugee group in China. According to a report published by Human Rights Watch, the Chinese government conducted “mass arbitrary detention, torture and mistreatment” of Uighur Turks in the region. As a first-hand source, an Uyghur Turk living in China has stated in an interview that the Chinese government torture Uyghurs by hanging them from their arms for hours and resorting to violence cruelly. Forced Sterilization The state is already struggling with widespread criticism for keeping mostly Muslim Uyghurs in detention camps. The Chinese government has demanded the existence of the detention camps before defending them as a necessary precaution against terrorism in terms of citizens' security due to separatist violence in the Xinjiang region. Unfortunately, the practice of forced MUNDP 2021 – Commitment to Development 3 Committee: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Agenda Item: Developing solutions to eradicate the maltreatment of Uyghur Turks in China Student Officer & Role: Melike Koca, Deputy Chair sterilization is a cruel action that still takes place in the 21st century; it overwhelmingly targets minorities. A Chinese-published “Analysis Report on Population Change in Xinjiang" refutes these statements, attributing the decline of the Uighur Muslim population to the “eradication of religious extremism. An Figure 2 - Birth rates in Uyghur areas between 2010-2017 AP investigation in 2020 proves the Uighur women are forced to have regular pregnancy checks, IUDs, sterilizations, and also abortion. Forced Labor Many UN members have accused China of the fact that the Uighur Turks are forced laborers, and their recruitment in firms is completely against the law and human rights. According to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s report, over 80,000 million Uyghur Turks were sent to factories directly from detention camps between 2017 to 2019. According to a report by Citizen Power Initiatives for China (CPIC), Xinjiang is home to 84% of the country's cotton and exports material to many of China's clothing manufacturers. Lately, a non-profit organization from Washington DC’s report stated that China has been using forced labor camps and prison labor to profit off of the cotton industry in its Xinjiang region. Turkish-Chinese Relations In recent years, due to the separatist movements in the Xinjiang region, Chinese and Turkish governments have started to strengthen their relations and cooperation. Turkey has also increased deportations of Uyghurs to China. After the release of an insight view of the detention camps, Turkey has specifically stated its concerns and condemnation. Turkey’s Foreign Ministry has stated that Uighur Turks are facing torture in concentration camps, “The reintroduction of detention camps in the 21st century and the systematic assimilation policy of Chinese authorities against the Uighur Turks is a great embarrassment for humanity.’’ In short, the Turkish government has called upon every member state of the UN to collaborate on the issue of maltreatment of Uyghur Turks in China to conclude the violation of human rights. MUNDP 2021 – Commitment to Development 4 Committee: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Agenda Item: Developing solutions to eradicate the maltreatment of Uyghur Turks in China Student Officer & Role: Melike Koca, Deputy Chair Uyghur Children in Xinjiang
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Teach Uyghur Project Educational Outreach Document
    TEACH UYGHUR PROJECT EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH DOCUMENT UYGHUR AMERICAN ASSOCIATION / NOVEMBER 2020 Who are the Uyghurs? The Uyghurs are a Turkic, majority Muslim ethnic group indigenous to Central Asia. The Uyghur homeland is known to Uyghurs as East Turkistan, but is officially known and internationally recognized as the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People's Republic of China. Due to the occupation of their homeland by the Qing Dynasty of China and the colonization of East Turkistan initiated by the Chinese Communist Party, many Uyghurs have fled abroad. There are several hundred thousand Uyghurs living in the independent Central Asian states of Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan, as well as a large diaspora in Turkey and in Europe. There are and estimated 8,000 to 10,000 Uyghurs in the United States. The Uyghur people are currently being subjected to a campaign of mass incarceration, mass surveillance, forced labor, population control, and genocide, perpetrated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). About the Uyghur American Association (UAA) Established in 1998, the Uyghur American Association (UAA) is a non-partisan organization with the chief goals of promoting and preserving Uyghur culture, and supporting the right of Uyghur people to use peaceful, democratic means to determine their own political futures. Based in the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Area, the UAA serves as the primary hub for the Uyghur diaspora community in the United States. About the "Teach Uyghur Project" Education is a powerful tool for facilitating change. The goal of this project is to encourage teachers to teach about Uyghurs, and to persuade schools, and eventually state legislatures, to incorporate Uyghurs into primary and secondary school curriculum.
    [Show full text]
  • These Sources Are Verifiable and Come From
    0 General aim: To give institutions a report as unbiased, independent and reliable as possible, in order to raise the quality of the debate and thus the relative political decisions. Specific aims: To circulate this report to mass media and in public fora of various nature (i.e. human rights summits) as well as at the institutional level, with the purpose of enriching the reader’s knowledge and understanding of this region, given its huge implications in the world peace process. As is well known, for some years now highly politicised anti-Chinese propaganda campaigns have targeted the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, often spreading groundless, non-verifiable or outright false information, triggering on these bases a sanctions war and causing serious damage to international relations. There is a dramatic lack of unbiased and alternative documentation on the topic, especially by researchers who have lived and studied in China and Xinjiang. This report aims to fill this gap, by deepening and contextualising the region and its real political, economic and social dynamics, and offering an authoritative and documented point of view vis-à- vis the reports that Western politicians currently have at their disposal. The ultimate goal of this documentation is to promote an informed public debate on the topic and offer policymakers and civil society a different point of view from the biased and specious accusations coming from the Five Eyes countries, the EU and some NGOs and think-tanks. Recently some Swedish researchers have done a great job of deconstructing the main Western allegations about the situation in the autonomous region of Xinjiang.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying International Law Solutions to the Xinjiang Crisis
    Applying International Law Solutions to the Xinjiang Crisis Preston Jordan Lim* I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 90 II. LEGAL CATEGORIZATION OF ABUSES IN XINJIANG............................ 94 A. Terms of Moderate Utility ....................................................................... 96 1. Genocide: A Term of Moderate Utility ................................................ 96 2. Cultural Genocide: A Term of Moderate Utility ................................ 102 3. Violative of Human Rights Treaties: A Term of Moderate Utility .... 107 B. Terms of High Utility .............................................................................. 111 1. Crimes Against Humanity: A Term of High Utility ............................ 112 i. Torture ............................................................................................ 117 ii. Forced Sterilization ....................................................................... 120 iii. Apartheid ....................................................................................... 122 2. Forced Labor, as Differentiated from Enslavement: A Term of High Utility ........................................................................................................ 125 III. HOLDING CHINA TO ACCOUNT ........................................................ 129 A. Suit Before the International Criminal Court ....................................... 129 B. Suit Before the International Court of Justice ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Uyghurs of China: a Genocide in the Making
    The Uyghurs of China: A Genocide in the Making Tracking the Stages of Genocide Henrietta Störig International Relations Dept. of Global Political Studies Bachelor programme – IR103L 15 credits thesis Spring 2020 Supervisor: Erika Svedberg Henrietta Störig 980123-T029 Malmö University Abstract Recent reports on the forced sterilization of Uyghur women in the People’s Republic of China prompted experts to recognize the on-going situation as genocide. The aim of this thesis is to examine the different events that constitute the current genocide of the Uyghur nation in China, what led to it, and how it is likely to further develop. Based on Stanton’s 10 Stages of Genocide, a simple historical process research is conducted to analyse the causes and stages of the Uyghur genocide, and to make predictions regarding the ensuing stages and international intervention. By applying the theory of constructivism to the analysis, it becomes evident that genocide is a process that is produced by the social, economic, and political international structure, which renders many prevention measures ineffective. The thesis concludes that only immediate international intervention and prosecution of the perpetrator on the count of genocide conspiracy can prevent the irreversible destruction of the Uyghur nation. (Word count: 13 991) Henrietta Störig 980123-T029 Malmö University Table of Contents I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 II. Literature Review ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Uyghur Genocide
    THE UYGHUR GENOCIDE Brent Marrero Pagan THE UYGHURS The Uyghurs are an ethnic minority that consists of 11 million members. They practice Islam and identify as Muslim. They live in the contested Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). However, they identify the region by the name of East Turkestan. They speak Standard Xinjiang and Standard Soviet. They are facing genocide carried out by the government of the PRC. EAST TURKESTAN The current size of the region is 1.82 million square kilometers. It’s home to at least 11 million Uyghurs and 8.75 ethnic Han Chinese. It was annexed by the Chinese Communist Party as the result of an invasion in 1949. This is how it got the name of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. Because of its abundance in oil and mineral supplies, it was designated a “special economic zone” in hopes of creating employment opportunities and attracting foreign companies. ECONOMIC FACTORS • As the home of the largest coal and natural gas reserves in China, Xinjiang is crucial to the PRC’s Belt and Road Initiative, a massive infrastructure project meant to mimic the Silk Road. The Belt and Road Initiative will be a vast network of railways, highways, and energy pipelines that will extend westward through the former Soviet republics, southward to the Indian subcontinent, and to the rest of Southeast Asia. It would expand the international use of the PRC’s currency, boost Chinese incomes and domestic consumption, and boost global economic links to the PRC’s western regions. • To continue development through Xinjiang, the PRC wants to make sure there is no possibility of separatist activity from the Uyghurs.
    [Show full text]
  • IFC's FPIC and the Cultural Genocide of Uyghurs
    IFC’s FPIC and the Cultural Genocide of Uyghurs A failure to apply PS7 in Xinjiang links IFC to gross human rights violations KENDYL SALCITO March 2021 IFC’s 2012 Performance Standards purport to safeguard the indigenous right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent for impacts on their lands, livelihoods and culture associated with IFC investments. Performance Standard 7 should assure that development projects on indigenous lands directly benefit and are accepted by indigenous peoples. Yet IFC has never implemented its FPIC standard in Xinjiang, despite having investments in agriculture, energy and surveillance technology in the region. The failure to adequately implement PS7 has made IFC complicit in the ethnic cleansing underway in the region. This report outlines these findings and proposes mitigation measures. 0 Executive Summary The World Bank’s private lending arm, the financing is contributing to the Uyghur cul- • The UK government has modified its International Finance Corporation (IFC), tural genocide in Xinjiang. modern slavery fines to directly penal- has committed to upholding the rights of ize companies credibly linked Xinjiang NomoGaia alerted the IFC to these con- indigenous peoples since at least 2012, abuses;ii cerns in November 2020 and engaged with with the launch of its updated Perfor- • the bank to seek evidence demonstrating The Australian and Japanese govern- mance Standards. Implementation of this that these risks are managed. Two Xinjiang ments have proposed bills to sanction commitment has come under scrutiny in products from Xinjiang;iii investments have been divested in that the past. Today, evidence suggests that period. Some of IFC’s inquiries into client • Auditors from French, UK, German and failure to adequately safeguard indigenous operations in the region have documented US firms refuse to conduct audits in the peoples is contributing to an ongoing cul- a degree of risk mitigation.
    [Show full text]
  • China-Uyghur-Genocide-And-Historical-Perspective.Pdf
    1 China’s Uyghur Genocide and its historical perspective Aziz Isa Elkun Research Affiliate at SOAS, University of London [email protected] | www.azizisa.org/en Since 2014, the Chinese government has started building a massive network of internment camps or “modern high-tech surveillance prisons” across the Uyghur Autonomous Region, and media reported that some of the camps could host up to 10 thousand detainees.1 According to various estimated sources, up to three million Uyghurs and other Turkic citizens of China were kept illegally in these camps, which are described by the Chinese authorities as “Vocational Education Training Centres” with Chinese characteristics. The existence of such internment camps was first revealed by Western academics, media, and Human Rights organizations in early spring 2017. There is no dispute about the urgency of the “Uyghur crisis” today in China. It’s arguably one of the most severe crimes that a country has openly committed since the Second World War: a kind of slow-motion “genocide” against a specific ethnicity on a massive scale. 2 But it has a long history that goes back to when China started building its first defensive wall, the "Great Wall of China." When we recall the region's brutal history, the Uyghur crisis is not a new crisis but an old unsolved one that has only come to the world's attention at the beginning of this digital surveillance century. We have to remember the region's war-torn history while connecting the current tragical events to the past. We have to talk about the historical perspectives of the ongoing Uyghur Genocide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uighur Riots in China: What Do Facebook Groups Say?
    The Uighur Riots in China: What do Facebook groups say? The Uighur Riots in China: What do Facebook groups say? Mohamed Alaa Abdel-Moneim and Rita J. Simon , the American University Introduction In July 2009, China witnessed its worst ethnic clashes in decades, excluding those in Tibet, when protests by Uighurs in Urumqi, capital of the western Xinjiang province, turned violent after police intervention. The protest started after two Uighur workers in the southern district of Guangdong had been killed as a result of racial violence. Soon afterwards, individuals belonging to the majority Han ethnicity, who represent about 92% of the Chinese population, but only 40% of the population of Xinjiang, attacked Uighur targets and individuals. The death toll rose to at least 150 individuals, although the racial breakdown of the deceased is still not quite clear. The government moved quickly to round up suspects and threatened to execute those directly involved in the violent incidents. Hundreds of Uighurs were detained by police1. In this article, we review a number of group pages on Facebook to understand the ideas and dynamics that influenced opinion toward the Uighur cause in China. Our survey is limited to groups that are in English, and we focused on groups that are large enough in terms of numbers and that are active in terms of discussions and posts. We focused on groups that had an earlier interest in the Uighur cause and those that sprang up after the riots to defend the Uighur rights and/or criticize the Chinese government’s position and policies. Thus the groups we chose were mostly supportive of the Uighurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Never Again: the UK's Responsibility to Act on Atrocities in Xinjiang And
    House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Never Again: The UK’s Responsibility to Act on Atrocities in Xinjiang and Beyond Second Report of Session 2021–22 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 29 June 2021 HC 198 HC 800 (in session 2019–21) Published on 8 July 2021 by authority of the House of Commons The Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Tom Tugendhat MP (Conservative, Tonbridge and Malling) (Chair) Chris Bryant MP (Labour, Rhondda) Neil Coyle MP (Labour, Bermondsey and Old Southwark) Alicia Kearns MP (Conservative, Rutland and Melton) Stewart Malcolm McDonald MP (Scottish National Party, Glasgow South) Andrew Rosindell MP (Conservative, Romford) Bob Seely MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) Henry Smith MP (Conservative, Crawley) Royston Smith MP (Conservative, Southampton, Itchen) Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Claudia Webbe MP (Independent, Leicester East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021. This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/. Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/ facom and in print by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ccp's Strategies in Tibet, the Uyghur Region, and Hong Kong
    100 YEARS OF SUPPRESSION: THE CCP'S STRATEGIES IN TIBET, THE UYGHUR REGION, AND HONG KONG REPORT NEW YORK, AUGUST 2021 Prepared by: Human Rights Foundation Center for Law and Democracy 350 Fifth Avenue, #4202 New York, NY 10118 hrf.org 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 03 INTRODUCTION 04 BACKGROUND China & the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Political Regime Type: China Under Xi Jinping Tibet Uyghur Region Hong Kong 16 SUPPRESSION TACTICS 17 Broken Promises: Political Disenfranchisement Tibet: Unwarranted Interference Uyghur Region: The Impossibility of Power Sharing Hong Kong: The Fallacy of “One Country, Two Systems” 23 Tightening the Iron Grip: Crackdowns, Detainment, and Torture Tibet: Arbitrary Detention and Torture of Religious Individuals Uyghur Region: Quelling Civil Unrest Through Brute Force Hong Kong: Behind Bars for Protecting the Truth 31 Precipitous Erasure: Cultural Suppression The Dilution of Cultural Identity Tibet: Sinicization of Tibetan Heritage Uyghur Region: Destroying the Uyghur Identity Targeting the Next Generation: Educational Interference Tibet: The Power of Language and Textbooks Uyghur Region: Chinese Language Promotion Hong Kong: Looming Guidelines and Bans 42 Religious Repression Systematic Destruction of Religious Institutions Tibet: Dismantling of Religious Establishments Uyghur Region: The Ruination of Religious Infrastructure Doctrinal Manipulation Tibet: Disruption of Religious Protocols and Reincarnations Uyghur Region: Appropriating Islamic Texts TABLE OF CONTENT The Disruption of Daily life Tibet
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submitted by Dr Joanne Smith Finley (XIN0084)
    Written evidence submitted by Dr Joanne Smith Finley (XIN0084) Self-introduction: My name is Dr Joanne Smith Finley. I joined Newcastle University in January 2000, where I am Reader in Chinese Studies. My research interests have included the evolution of identities among the Uyghurs of Xinjiang, NW China, and in the Uyghur diaspora; strategies of symbolic resistance in Xinjiang; Uyghur women between Islamic revival and Chinese state securitization of religion; PRC counter-terrorism measures in Xinjiang as state terror; and political “re-education” in Xinjiang as (cultural) genocide. I am author of “Why Scholars and Activists Increasingly Fear a Uyghur Genocide in Xinjiang,” Journal of Genocide Research, 2020 (DOI: 10.1080/14623528.2020.1848109), “China’s Neo-Totalitarian Turn and Genocide in Xinjiang” (https://www.societyandspace.org/articles/chinas-neo-totalitarian- turn-and-genocide-in-xinjiang), “Securitization, Insecurity and Conflict in Contemporary Xinjiang: Has PRC Counter-Terrorism Evolved into State Terror?” Central Asian Survey, 2019 (DOI: 10.1080/02634937.2019.1586348), and The Art of Symbolic Resistance: Uyghur Identities and Uyghur-Han Relations in Contemporary Xinjiang (Brill Academic Publishing, 2013); and co-editor of Language, Education and Uyghur Identity in Urban Xinjiang (Routledge, 2015) and Situating the Uyghurs Between China and Central Asia (Ashgate, 2007). Based on three decades of expertise in Uyghur studies, I write occasional op-eds for the international media (e.g. https://www.chinafile.com/reporting-opinion/viewpoint/now-we- dont-talk-anymore) and give frequent interviews to investigative journalists, documentary filmmakers, and radio and television broadcasters. I serve as expert country witness in Uyghur asylum cases in the UK, Europe, the US and Canada, and advise legal firms, refugee support organizations, government departments, non-governmental organizations, think tanks, and investment firms (re: due diligence).
    [Show full text]
  • (Banning Goods Produced by Uyghur Forced Labour) Bill 2020 Submission 17
    4 February 2021 To: The Inquiry Secretary ‘Customs Amendment (Banning Goods Produced by Uyghur Forced Labour) Bill 2020’ Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee c/o [email protected] Public submission by Dr Michael Clarke (Associate Professor, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University and Visiting Fellow, Australia-China Relations Institute, University of Technology Sydney): Summary As an academic that has researched and published on the history and politics of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) for nearly twenty years, I welcome the opportunity to provide a submission to the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee Inquiry into the Customs Amendment (Banning Goods Produced by Uyghur Forced Labour) Bill 2020. The submission strongly supports the Customs Amendment (Banning Goods Produced by Uyghur Forced Labour) Bill 2020. The submission provides: 1. An introductory statement as to the current situation in Xinjiang; 2. A summary of the historical and political background to the current repression in the XUAR; 3. An examination of the ideological underpinnings and implications of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) system of ‘re-education’ in XUAR; 4. An examination of the connections between ‘re-education’, forced labour and the prospect of cultural genocide in the XUAR. 5. Recommendations for the Inquiry’s consideration. The submission hopes to highlight for the Inquiry that the issue of Uyghur coerced labour (and that of other Turkic Muslim ethnic minorities in XUAR) is indicative of a deeper system of mass repression that should have no place in the 21st century and which the Australian government should seek to ameliorate by all means within its remit and consistent with our values.
    [Show full text]