DOCSLIB.ORG

Rock Legends and Substantial Similarity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rock Legends and Substantial Similarity Against the Grain Manuscript 8172 Cases of Note- Copyright - Rock Legends and Substantial Similarity Bruce Strauch Bryan M. Carson Jack Montgomery Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/atg Part of the Library and Information Science Commons This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. LEGAL ISSUES Section Editors: Bruce Strauch (The Citadel) <[email protected]> Jack Montgomery (Western Kentucky University) <[email protected]> Cases of Note — Copyright Rock Legends and Substantial Similarity Column Editor: Bruce Strauch (The Citadel, Emeritus) <[email protected]> MICHAEL SKIDMORE AS TRUSTEE monicker of “Stephen Salacious.” But that breaks the works down into constituent ele- FOR THE RANDY CRAIG WOLFE TRUST sounds like a recommendation. ments and compares them. Swirsky v. Carey, v. ALL THE LED ZEPPELIN GANG AND Led Zeppelin and Wolfe moved in the 376 F.3d 841, 845 (9th Cir. 2004). WARNER MUSIC ET AL. 2018 U.S. APP. same circles. Zep would cover another Wolfe No, the jurors don’t have to have degrees in LEXIS 27680. song “Fresh Garbage.” They both performed Musicology. Expert witnesses are used. Apologies in advance for not knowing squat at concerts together. The intrinsic test is “whether the ordinary about music. But this is much in the news and The Zep gang heard “Taurus” repeatedly. reasonable person would find the total con- seems topical. Jimmy Page owned a copy of the album Spirit. cept and feel for the works to be substantially Randy Wolfe was a California rocker in 1971 brought us “Led Zeppelin IV.” And similar.” Three Boys Music Corp. v. Bolton, the glorious ’60s and was actually given the on it was — you guessed it — “Stairway to 212 F.3d 477, 485 (9th Cir. 2000). This is a nickname “Randy California” by none other Heaven.” subjective comparison. than Jimi Hendrix. In 1997, Randy “California” Wolfe And juries are good at being subjective. How cool is that? drowned in undertow off the coast of Molokai. For victory, the Trust needs a “yea” in Much of Randy’s work was not terribly All his intellectual property was put in a trust both tests. One “nay” knocks them out. The commercial, but he was revered among gui- by his mother. And percolating along was jury found no substantial similarity under the tarists, able to play like Hendrix, Clarence the question of whether Zep had ripped off extrinsic test so they didn’t have to go on to White, Roger McGuinn, or Wes Montgom- “Taurus.” intrinsic. ery, often all within the same song. The Supreme Court decided Notes of a scale are not He wrote the song “Taurus” for his first laches is not a defense for an protected by copyright, but album Spirit released in 1967 by Hollenbeck ongoing copyright violation you can combine unpro- Music which copyrighted it and listed him as in Petrella v. Metro-Gold- tectable elements to be the author. wyn-Mayer, Inc., 134 S. Ct. protectable. Swirsky, ’67 was the Summer of Love for those of you 1962, 1967-68 (2014). 376 F.3d at 848. The not old enough to remember. Hippies gathered Laches is a defense of dork- notes must be combined in Haight-Ashbury; Tim Leary advised “Turn ing around for too long before with enough originality on, tune in, drop out.” The “Human Be-In” at bringing your suit. You can see to make an original work of Golden Gate Park inspired the musical Hair. the reasoning of not a defense when authorship. Satava v. Lowry, 323 The Monterey Pop Festival introduced us “Stairway to Heaven” is beloved of drug users F.3d 805, 811 (9th Cir. 2003). to The Who, Grateful Dead, Big Brother and and still being played ad nauseam. Does that seem like something we need to the Holding Company, Jefferson Airplane, Thus, the trust sued for copyright infringe- be told? Janis Joplin. ment in 2015. At any rate, the district court failed to tell The media went crazy and defined the ’60s Trust claims the opening notes of “Stair- the jury that, but the 9th Circuit saw it as pretty as counterculture and sex, drugs, and rock- way” are substantially similar to those in harmless. “Taurus.” and-roll. In fact, the first half of the decade Because common sense? had been exactly like the ’50s. And American Jimmy Page the famous Zep music com- rubes such as myself only saw the second half poser admitted he owned the Spirit album but More importantly, the district court told the through the pages of Life magazine. had not heard it before he wrote “Stairway.” jury that copyright does not protect “chromatic scales, arpeggios or short sequences of three Led Zeppelin was formed in 1968 by Jim- Which given the concerts, seems untrue. notes.” my Page, Robert Plant, John Paul Jones, and The jury listened to both songs and deter- Little bitty bits are not original. John Bonham. Page (songwriter) and Plant mined that Zep had access to “Taurus” but the (lyrics) of course are legendary in rock history. songs were not substantially similar. Let’s remember that the bar for originality is pretty gosh darn low. It’s minimal creativity. The band, perhaps the most successful and And it went to appeal. influential in history after the Beatles, broke See: Feist Publ’ns v. Rural Telephone Serv. up in 1980 when drummer John Bonham The Ninth Circuit Co., Inc. 499 U.S. 340, 348 (1991). drank a major quantity of vodka for break- The holding of this case is 19-pages long If you recall, that one is about arrangement fast on top of his antidepressant meds and which is an exhausting read of legal gobble-de- of a telephone book. Which seems like a quaint pegged out. goop for me. But paring it down drastically, artifact today, but was an issue a couple of For their fleshly exploits seeStephen Davis, there’s really only one issue of interest — a decades ago. Hammer of the Gods (Wm. Morrow & Co. particular charge to the jury. And the 9th Circuit in Swirsky found that 1985). Mind you, the three surviving members Substantial similarity is required to prove chromatic scales were protectable. hate the book, and the author has the industry unlawful appropriation. The extrinsic test continued on page 56 54 Against the Grain / November 2018 <http://www.against-the-grain.com> Cases of Note Random Ramblings — Sex, from page 54 Chromatic scale is a scale of twelve pitches, Intellectual Freedom, and Academic each a semitone above or below the adjacent one. And that’s completely over my head. Libraries In an arpeggio, you take a chord and play it one note at a time. Okay, I get that. Column Editor: Bob Holley (Professor Emeritus, Wayne State University, The error was not harmless because the 13303 Borgman Avenue, Huntington Woods, MI 48070-1005; Trust’s expert witness testified that Zep had Phone: 248-547-0306) <[email protected]> copied an original chromatic scale. He said “Taurus” had public domain elements that were re academic libraries able to deal with consensual. Furthermore, in X-rated films, modified in an original way. And this would overtly sexually oriented materials women also abuse men. Finally, the pro- go to extrinsic substantial similarity. Arequired by their faculty for teaching ducers of X-rated films can find more than An original element of a song need not be and research? I have two reasons for writing enough willing female and male actors so new; just created independently in a creative this column. First, I’m using it as a practice that issues of sex trafficking are irrelevant way. Swirsky, 376 F.3d at 849. run for a presentation that I’ll be giving at the for mainstream productions. 2018 Charleston Conference. I’ll be exam- The jury charge was dismissive of his tes- The rules for following Constitutional ining the broader question of objectionable timony and contrary to a 9th Circuit holding. principles including freedom of speech are resources in general, but sexual materials will different for private and public academic So this got sent back for a new trial. be a key part of my presentation. Second, I libraries. Private institutions have a much Our son, who was a young teen in the glory was chair of the ACRL Intellectual Freedom greater ability to control the research and days of Led Zeppelin, listened to both intros Committee from 2002-2006 before it was teaching of their faculty. Religious insti- and said he couldn’t hear any similarity. So disbanded. I often heard that intellectual tutions have broader rights to require that trust would lose on the intrinsic test with him freedom wasn’t an issue for academic librar- their faculty and students adhere to certain on the jury. ies, but I strongly disagree. standards as long as doing so does not in- He also had an interesting take on laches. The proximate cause for my research was terfere with civil liberties enshrined in law, He reasoned that Randy California was alive a presentation at Wayne State University e.g., a prohibition against racial discrim- from ’71 to ’97 and heard “Stairway” numer- on December 2, 2017, by Jennifer Nash, ination. Some federal or state programs ous times. How could anyone not hear it? Associate Professor of Gender & Sexuality require further restrictions if the institution Over. And. Over. Studies and African American accepts tax dollars, but many He was pals with Led Zep, and as a mu- Studies at Northwestern Uni- offer exemptions from some sician’s musician, knew how music is put versity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Petitioner V
    No. ________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ______________________ Michael Skidmore, Trustee for the Randy Craig Wolfe Trust, Petitioner v. Led Zeppelin, et al., Respondents _______________________ On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ______________________ Alfred J. (AJ) Fluehr, Esquire Counsel of Record FRANCIS ALEXANDER LLC 280 N. Providence Road | Suite 1 Media, PA 19063 (215) 341-1063 [email protected] Attorney for Petitioner, Michael Skidmore, Trustee for the Randy Craig Wolfe Trust Dated: August 6, 2020 i Question Presented 1 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 represent the 106 years that the courts of this nation recognized that musical works were protected as created and fixed in a tangible medium under the Copyright Act of 1909—and that the deposit requirement was a technical formality. In those 106 years not one copyright trial was limited or controlled by the deposit, which was usually an incomplete outline of the song.
    [Show full text]
  • The Twenty Greatest Music Concerts I've Ever Seen
    THE TWENTY GREATEST MUSIC CONCERTS I'VE EVER SEEN Whew, I'm done. Let me remind everyone how this worked. I would go through my Ipod in that weird Ipod alphabetical order and when I would come upon an artist that I have seen live, I would replay that concert in my head. (BTW, since this segment started I no longer even have an ipod. All my music is on my laptop and phone now.) The number you see at the end of the concert description is the number of times I have seen that artist live. If it was multiple times, I would do my best to describe the one concert that I considered to be their best. If no number appears, it means I only saw that artist once. Mind you, I have seen many artists live that I do not have a song by on my Ipod. That artist is not represented here. So although the final number of concerts I have seen came to 828 concerts (wow, 828!), the number is actually higher. And there are "bar" bands and artists (like LeCompt and Sam Butera, for example) where I have seen them perform hundreds of sets, but I counted those as "one," although I have seen Lecompt in "concert" also. Any show you see with the four stars (****) means they came damn close to being one of the Top Twenty, but they fell just short. So here's the Twenty. Enjoy and thanks so much for all of your input. And don't sue me if I have a date wrong here and there.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruling in Laches Case May Cause a Bustle in the Hedgerow
    CHICAGOLAWBULLETIN.COM MONDAY, JUNE 30, 2014 ® Volume 160, No. 128 Ruling in laches case may cause a bustle in the hedgerow have rocked to the awesome - He was no doubt thinking about brought within the three-year ness of “Stairway to Heaven” the equitable doctrine of laches, window.” for a long time. Whenever which holds that if a person is INSIDE IP LAW The court did acknowledge that I’m at a wedding, I try to get aware he has a claim but waits an in extraordinary circumstances the band to play this Led unduly long time to assert it, then the laches doctrine might come IZeppelin classic. Not since Czech the claim is foreclosed. into play in determining equitable composer Johann Stamitz (1717- Certainly the members of Spirit remedies, such as injunctive relief, 1757) has a songwriter mastered heard “Stairway” upon its release or in assessing the profits of the the art of the crescendo as Jimmy in late 1970. Randy California said WILLIAM T. infringer attributable to the Page did with “Stairway.” And no in an interview published in 1997 infringement. lyrics can surpass Robert Plant’s that “Stairway” was a “rip-off” of MCGRATH As to the critique that this mysterious tale of the lady who’s his song. But he never did would allow plaintiffs to wait and sure that all that glitters is gold. I anything about it. Randy’s see whether the infringing work have often wondered, what do statement and ensuing inactivity William T. McGrath is a member of makes money, the court said “there these lyrics really mean? Based on were, of course, foreshadowed in Davis, McGrath LLC, where he is nothing untoward about waiting some recent developments, I think the last line of verse three — as handles copyright, trademark and to see whether an infringer’s I figured it out — they are about one of “the voices of those who Internet-related litigation and exploitation undercuts the value of counseling.
    [Show full text]
  • Stairway to Heaven Verdict
    Stairway To Heaven Verdict Stomachy Fabio usually fare some corbeille or immobilizes lentamente. Lateritic Stearne cross-fertilizes her honourer so mobs that Gerrard turtle very peradventure. Mealy-mouthed and vimineous Friedrich still delaminate his Karroo sanguinely. Finally has changed a little reason to other cases often playing and stairway to heaven verdict and appeal to be deemed substantially similar to step ahead of. Brooklyn rapper bobby shmurda is stairway to heaven verdict would. Issa rae young guitarists often proved by a stairway to heaven verdict in the trial judge in the superstar head to be said he began on. Robin thicke and stairway, joins except as a verdict on pretrial proceedings and stairway to heaven verdict. Tgx is stairway to heaven verdict, which requires a verdict. These same rhythm and stairway to heaven verdict. Robin thicke and the instruction on tuesday night, stairway to heaven verdict placing led zeppelin for being hailed as randy must prove that. Ultimately not only the founders of paying attention to heaven banned in? It did not object to give the court declined to talk with the jury; bad karma and a means for locking up of stairway to heaven verdict. Now they would have endorsed it was a tool shed where he first american artist on thursday, stairway to heaven verdict and arrangement instruction on. His opinion of stairway to heaven verdict was sued at. Kylie Jenner shows off at long legs in tight denim mini. Greg hunt says the verdict that there is stairway to heaven and arrangement must be seen the stairway to heaven verdict.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit C.A
    Case: 16-56057, 10/26/2018, ID: 11063164, DktEntry: 74, Page 1 of 61 United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit C.A. 16-56057 __________________ Skidmore et al. v. Led Zeppelin et al. Michael Skidmore, Trustee for the Randy Craig Wolfe Trust Appellant. __________________________ Appellant’s Petition for Limited Panel Rehearing/Rehearing En Banc _____________________________________ (Music copyright infringement, from the September 28, 2018 panel opinion reversing in part, affirming in part orders of the Honorable R. Gary Klausner, of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The case was docketed in the Central District at 15- cv-03462) _____________________________________ Francis Alexander, LLC Francis Malofiy, Esquire Alfred J. Fluehr, Esquire 280 N. Providence Road | Suite 1 Media, PA 19063 T: (215) 500-1000 F: (215) 500-1005 Law Firm / Lawyer for Appellant Skidmore Page 1 of 22 Case: 16-56057, 10/26/2018, ID: 11063164, DktEntry: 74, Page 2 of 61 Table of Contents Table of Authorities .............................................................................. 3 Introduction ............................................................................................. 4 Reasons for Rehearing ........................................................................... 6 Questions Presented for Review ........................................................ 9 Facts ............................................................................................................ 10 Argument ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Skidmore V. Led Zeppelin: Extraordinary Circumstances and the Perpetual Statute of Limitations in Copyright Infringement
    Maine Law Review Volume 69 Number 2 Article 7 August 2017 Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin: Extraordinary Circumstances and the Perpetual Statute of Limitations in Copyright Infringement Joseph A. Greene University of Maine School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/mlr Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Joseph A. Greene, Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin: Extraordinary Circumstances and the Perpetual Statute of Limitations in Copyright Infringement, 69 Me. L. Rev. 307 (2017). Available at: https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/mlr/vol69/iss2/7 This Case Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SKIDMORE V. LED ZEPPELIN: EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES AND THE PERPETUAL STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IN COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT Joseph A. Greene I. INTRODUCTION II. SKIDMORE V.LED ZEPPELIN A. Facts B. Arguments C. Holdings III. COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT IN MUSIC A. Protected Subject Matter in Music Copyrights B. Substantial Similarity IV. LIMITATIONS ON ACTIONS FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT A. Statute of Limitations 1. Moment of Accrual 2. How to Measure Three Years B. Waiver/Abandonment C. Development of the Equitable Doctrine of Laches V. “RAGING BULL”: THE SUPREME COURT WEIGHS IN A. Background B. Holding and Reasoning C. Dissent VI. ANALYSIS VII. CONGRESSIONAL REPAIRS VIII. CONCLUSION 308 MAINE LAW REVIEW [Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock & Roll's War Against
    Rock & Roll’s War Against God Copyright 2015 by David W. Cloud ISBN 978-1-58318-183-6 Tis book is published for free distribution in eBook format. It is available in PDF, Mobi (for Kindle, etc.) and ePub formats from the Way of Life web site. See the Free eBook tab at www.wayofife.org. We do not allow distribution of our free books from other web sites. Published by Way of Life Literature PO Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061 866-295-4143 (toll free) - [email protected] www.wayofife.org Canada: Bethel Baptist Church 4212 Campbell St. N., London Ont. N6P 1A6 519-652-2619 Printed in Canada by Bethel Baptist Print Ministry ii Table of Contents Introduction ...........................................................................1 What Christians Should Know about Rock Music ...........5 What Rock Did For Me ......................................................38 Te History of Rock Music ................................................49 How Rock & Roll Took over Western Society ...............123 1950s Rock .........................................................................140 1960s Rock: Continuing the Revolution ........................193 Te Character of Rock & Roll .........................................347 Te Rhythm of Rock Music .............................................381 Rock Musicians as Mediums ...........................................387 Rock Music and Voodoo ..................................................394 Rock Music and Insanity ..................................................407 Rock Music and Suicide ...................................................429
    [Show full text]
  • July 2016 - Volume 1
    *ADVERTISEMENT* Marks Gray, P.A. - Intellectual Property - July 2016 - Volume 1 Crystal T. Broughan Intellectual Property Attorney [You Created It. We Protect It.] My Updates: [C rystal's C orner] Cover Your Assets! Do you have an inventory of your company's intellectual property (IP) assets? Do you even know what is considered an Intellectual Property asset? Intellectual Property is everywhere in the world of business and business owners should make sure they protect their assets since intellectual property is crucial to the success of their business. The most common types of IP assets are: Trademarks Copyrights Patents Trade Secrets Trademarks are brands, logos,service marks, collective marks, and trade names. Copyrights protect the expressionof ideas – software code, websites, curriculum, how-to-manuals, paintings,books, sculpture, audio and visual recordings, musical and dramatic works. Patents are for the protection oftechnical and functional inventions of products and processes that are new andnot obvious. Trade Secrets are all forms andtypes of financial, business, scientific, technical, economic, or engineeringinformation if the owner has taken reasonable measures to keep them secret andthe information derives independent economic value from not being generallyknown. Actions you should take: Conduct an audit to identify allregistered and unregistered trademarks and copyrights. Include all patent registrations and inventionsthat you intend to patent or keep as a trade secret. Invest in well written and up todate non-disclosure agreements. Makesure all of your employment and vendor agreements, licensing agreements, salescontracts and technology transfer agreements protect your IP assets. File trademark applications forall unregistered word marks, service marks, logos, collective marks and tradenames.
    [Show full text]
  • Stairway to Heaven, Or to the Jury Room?
    LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL PERSPECTIVE WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2014 • PAGE 5 Stairway to Heaven, or to the jury room? By Corey Field that includes copious detail on melody, harmony, bass lines, ar- rangements and extensive musi- andy California, born cal notation examples, which are Randy Craig Wolfe, was always interesting to see in court a 1960s rock and roll opinions, especially for those child prodigy guitar- who can read musical notation. Rist, singer and songwriter who But mere alignment of notes may was mentored by Jimi Hendrix not tell the whole story of what is and co-founded the band Spirit, original to the author, and what which released its first LP in constitutes common elements. 1968 when Randy was still just 16 In the “Blurred Lines” case, the years old. Wolfe’s song recorded court found there was a genuine with Spirit, “I Got a Line on You” issue of material fact, and denied is perhaps his most enduring, summary judgment. and gloriously high energy hit. Some of the more well-known Spirit’s eponymous debut al- song copyright infringement bum included an instrumental holdings include a holding in track titled “Taurus,” a mel- 1976 that George Harrison had low instrumental anthem with subconsciously infringed the dreamy orchestra interludes pop song “He’s So Fine” when supporting an arpeggiated he wrote “My Sweet Lord” quasi-classical guitar solo in a (Bright Tunes Music v. Har- minor key. Its orchestrations risongs Music, 420 F. Supp. 177 and slow descending bass notes (S.D.N.Y. 1976)), and the 9th might, to some, evoke the mood U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Business Review
    | | FEBRUARY 19, 2016 DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW PRACTICE FOCUS / INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Decades Later, ‘Stairway to Heaven’ Still in Dispute Commentary by Can the estate climb this In 1968, a then-unknown James G. Sammataro stairway to a judgment in its Led Zeppelin opened for and favor? It’s a steep climb. shared the bill with California’s Randy California always The estate’s first step was band, Spirit — a pioneer of the said so. A guitar virtuoso dis- to overcome a seemingly pre- psychedelic rock sound that covered by Jimi posterous delay of 43 years incorporated delay and distor- Hendrix at age before filing suit. They made tion effects to bend minds and 15, California it thanks to the U.S. Supreme alter moods. Zeppelin covered plucked a dis- Court’s 2014 “Raging Bull” Spirit’s tune “Fresh Garbage” tinct guitar line decision in Petralla v. Metro- during their sets. on his band’s Goldwyn-Mayer, which elimi- In early interviews, Zeppelin 1968 instru- nated the defense of laches guitarist Jimmy Page stated Sammataro mental “Taurus” (undue delay) from copyright how Spirit’s music moved that reminds cases and sanctioned a re- him “on an emotional level.” some of a guitar line from Led volving three-year look back Further, Zeppelin, long ac- Zeppelin’s 1971 smash hit in copyright infringement cused of boosting classic “Stairway to Heaven.” actions. blues songs, is no stranger to Until his death in 1997, The estate’s next step is infringement actions, having California refused to sue. He to demonstrate it has enough settled at least six claims in- just wanted of a case to volving “Dazed & Confused,” an artist’s fair survive a sum- “Babe, I’m Gonna Leave recognition: a BOARD OF mary judgment You” and “Whole Lotta Love” liner credit, a CONTRIBUTORS motion.
    [Show full text]
  • A Year in the Life of Bottle the Curmudgeon What You Are About to Read Is the Book of the Blog of the Facebook Project I Started When My Dad Died in 2019
    A Year in the Life of Bottle the Curmudgeon What you are about to read is the book of the blog of the Facebook project I started when my dad died in 2019. It also happens to be many more things: a diary, a commentary on contemporaneous events, a series of stories, lectures, and diatribes on politics, religion, art, business, philosophy, and pop culture, all in the mostly daily publishing of 365 essays, ostensibly about an album, but really just what spewed from my brain while listening to an album. I finished the last essay on June 19, 2020 and began putting it into book from. The hyperlinked but typo rich version of these essays is available at: https://albumsforeternity.blogspot.com/ Thank you for reading, I hope you find it enjoyable, possibly even entertaining. bottleofbeef.com exists, why not give it a visit? Have an album you want me to review? Want to give feedback or converse about something? Send your own wordy words to [email protected] , and I will most likely reply. Unless you’re being a jerk. © Bottle of Beef 2020, all rights reserved. Welcome to my record collection. This is a book about my love of listening to albums. It started off as a nightly perusal of my dad's record collection (which sadly became mine) on my personal Facebook page. Over the ensuing months it became quite an enjoyable process of simply ranting about what I think is a real art form, the album. It exists in three forms: nightly posts on Facebook, a chronologically maintained blog that is still ongoing (though less frequent), and now this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Stairway to Heaven
    Case 2:15-cv-03462-RGK-AGR Document 1 Filed 05/31/14 Page 1 of 40 Page ID #:1 United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania Michael Skidmore, as Trustee for the: No.: tbd Randy Craig Wolfe Trust Plaintiff Case Filed: May 31, 2014 v. Led Zeppelin Causes of Action: James Patrick Page Copyright Infringement Robert Anthony Plant John Paul Jones Right of Attribution – Falsification of Super Hype Publishing, Inc. Rock n’ Roll History Warner Music Group Corp. Parent of: Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. Atlantic Recording Corporation Rhino Entertainment Company Jury Trial Demanded Defendants Plaintiff’s Complaint Copyright Infringement and Related Claims Regarding Stairway to Heaven Francis Alexander, llc Francis Alexander Malofiy, Esquire Attorney ID No.: 208494 280 N. Providence Road | Suite 105 Media, PA 19063 T: (215) 500-1000 F: (215) 500-1005 E: [email protected] Law Firm / Lawyer for Plaintiff Case 2:15-cv-03462-RGK-AGR Document 1 Filed 05/31/14 Page 2 of 40 Page ID #:2 Preamble 1. In the summer of 1967, Randy Craig Wolfe (aka Randy California), discovered by Jimi Hendrix, was a founding member of the eclectic rock band Spirit who pioneered the psychedelic rock sound. The band fused rock and jazz and enhanced the audio palette by incorporating mind-bending and mood-altering effects such as the Etherwave-Theremin, delay, and distortion into their recorded songs and live performances. 2. In January 1968 Spirit released a self-titled album named Spirit—a top 40 Billboard charting album. On that album was a unique 2 minute and 37 second instrumental titled “Taurus” which has a distinct-plucked guitar line and melody.
    [Show full text]