DOCSLIB.ORG

Occurrence Model for Magmatic Sulfide-Rich Nickel-Copper-(Platinum-Group Element) Deposits Related to Mafic and Ultramafic Dike-Sill Complexes: U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Occurrence Model for Magmatic Sulfide-Rich Nickel-Copper-(Platinum-Group Element) Deposits Related to Mafic and Ultramafic Dike-Sill Complexes: U.S Occurrence Model for Magmatic Sulfide-Rich Nickel- Copper-(Platinum-Group Element) Deposits Related to Mafic and Ultramafic Dike-Sill Complexes Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–I U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER. Ferrar dikes and sills intruding Beacon sandstones, Finger Mountain, Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Photograph by Dean Peterson, Duluth Metals Limited. Occurrence Model for Magmatic Sulfide- Rich Nickel-Copper-(Platinum-Group Element) Deposits Related to Mafic and Ultramafic Dike-Sill Complexes By Klaus J. Schulz, Laurel G. Woodruff, Suzanne W. Nicholson, Robert R. Seal II, Nadine M. Piatak, Val W. Chandler, and John L. Mars Chapter I of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–I U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Schulz, K.J., Woodruff, L.G., Nicholson, S.W., Seal, R.R., II, Piatak, N.M., Chandler, V.W., and Mars, J.L., 2014, Occurrence model for magmatic sulfide-rich nickel-copper-(platinum-group element) deposits related to mafic and ultramafic dike-sill complexes: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–I, 80 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20105070I. ISSN 2328-0328 (online) iii Contents 1. Introduction Overview..........................................................................................................................................................1 Scope ...............................................................................................................................................................1 Purpose............................................................................................................................................................3 2. Deposit Type and Associated Deposits Name and Synonyms.....................................................................................................................................3 Brief Deposit Description .............................................................................................................................3 Associated Deposit Types ............................................................................................................................4 Primary and Byproduct Commodities .........................................................................................................4 Example Deposits...........................................................................................................................................4 3. Historical Evolution of Descriptive and Genetic Knowledge and Concepts 4. Regional Environment Geotectonic Environment ...........................................................................................................................10 Temporal (Secular) Relations .....................................................................................................................11 Duration of Magmatic-Hydrothermal System and/or Mineralizing Processes .................................11 Relations to Structures ...............................................................................................................................11 Relations to Igneous Rocks ........................................................................................................................12 Relations to Sedimentary Rocks ...............................................................................................................12 Relations to Metamorphic Rocks ..............................................................................................................12 5. Physical Description of Deposits Size and Shape of Deposits .......................................................................................................................13 Size of Mineralizing System Relative to Extent of Economically Mineralized Rock .........................15 Host Rocks ....................................................................................................................................................16 Structural Setting(s) and Controls ............................................................................................................16 6. Geophysical Signatures Introduction...................................................................................................................................................16 Magnetic Signature .....................................................................................................................................17 Gravity Signature .........................................................................................................................................17 Electrical Signature .....................................................................................................................................20 Electromagnetic (EM) Signature ...............................................................................................................21 Seismic Signature ........................................................................................................................................23 Spectral Characteristics ............................................................................................................................24 7. Hypogene and Supergene Ore Characteristics Hypogene Ore Characteristics ..................................................................................................................31 Mineralogy and Mineral Assemblages ...........................................................................................31 Paragenesis .........................................................................................................................................32 Zoning Patterns ...................................................................................................................................34 Textures and Structures ....................................................................................................................35 Grain Sizes ...........................................................................................................................................36 Supergene Ore Characteristics .................................................................................................................37 8. Hypogene Gangue Characteristics Mineralogy and Mineral Assemblages ....................................................................................................37 Paragenesis .................................................................................................................................................37 iv 9. Geochemical Characteristics of Ores Trace Elements and Element Associations ............................................................................................38 Metal Normalizations and Ratios .............................................................................................................38 Stable Isotopes.............................................................................................................................................41 Sulfur Isotopes ...................................................................................................................................41 Oxygen Isotopes..................................................................................................................................42 Radiogenic Isotopes ....................................................................................................................................44 Rhenium-Osmium Isotopes ...............................................................................................................44 Rubidium-Strontium, Samarium-Neodymium, and Lead Isotopes .............................................45 10. Petrology of Associated Igneous Rocks Rock Names ..................................................................................................................................................46 Forms of Igneous Rocks and Rock Associations ...................................................................................46 Mineralogy ....................................................................................................................................................46 Textures, Structures, and Grain Size ........................................................................................................48 Petrochemistry .............................................................................................................................................49
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geomorphology of the Bushveld Complex
    Cademo Lab. Xeo16xico de Laxe Coruña. 1997. Vol. 22, pp. 209-227 Geomorphology of the Bushveld Complex Geomorfología del Complejo de Bushveld LAGEAT,Y. This paper deals wich che differenc relacion becween scruccure and lichology in che geomorphology of che Bushveld Complexo The final resules demonscrace chac, even so differenc scale ofsize, widerfor che epirogenic-cecconic movements and smaller for che lichology, che cwo faccors need co be considered for a beccer underscanding ofche landscape evolucion ofche area. Key words: ulerabasic and basic rocks, Bushveld Complex, scruccural geomorphology, lichological differences. LAGEAT, Y. (Universicé Blaise Pascaland UPRES-A 6042 (CNRS). Clermont-Ferrand (France) 210 Lageat, Y. CAD. LAB. XEOL. LAXE 22 (997) INTRODUCTION subdued topography. So, being concerned with the relationships between scenery and In spiteofthestrong emphasisonclimatic structure, the study wil1 consider two topics in French geomorphology since the different but complementary topics: fifties, research dealing with structural differential erosion and regional evolution landforms developed in crystalline shields ofa shield area (Y. LAGEAT, 1989). pioneered by the late Professor P. Birot has been upheld. In numerous regional monographs, widely distributed between GEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL theArcticCircleand theTropicofCapricorn, special attention has been devoted to the A presentation of the geology of the relationships between landforms and Bushveld Complex is essential to any geological structure, with the purpose to understanding of its surface morphology. distinguish between the direct control of Ranging in composition from ultrabasic ro recent faulting and the response of acid, it outcrops largely within a region contrasting rock units todifferential erosiono covered bya characteristicvegetation termed This ambiguity may be easily overcome in «Bushveld».
    [Show full text]
  • The Nain Anorthosite Project, Labrador: Field
    THE NAIN ANORTHOSITE PROJECT, LABRADOR: FIELD REPORT 1971 S. A. MORSE I EDITOR R. V. PITS I ULAK CONTRIBUTION NO. 9 GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST, MASSACHUSETTS L THE NAIN ANORTHOSITE PROJECT, LABRADOR: FIElD REPORT 1971 S. A. Morse, Editor Final Report under NSF Grants GA-21386 and GA-27134 to Franklin and Marshall College: "Evolution of Anorthosite and Related Crustal Rocks in Coastal Labrador", and "Facility for Crustal Studies in Coastal Labrador." S. A. Morse, Principal Investigator (now at U.Mass/Amherst) Dirk de Waard, Syracuse Associate Investigators E. P. Wheeler 2nd, Cornell Other contributors: Research Assistants: J. H. Berg, U. Mass/Amherst C. D. Brauer, Vassar G. A. Plananaky, Harvard F. Finley, Syracuse C. C. Rubins, Syracuse T. H. Folkomer, Franklin & Marshall B.G.J. Upton, Edinburgh D. Russell, Syracuse Charles Woodward, Syracuse J. A. Speer, Virginia Polytechnic Contribution No. 9 Amherst, Massachusetts Geology Department December, 1971 Uni~ersity of Massachusetts L I - CONTENTS INTRODUCTION •••••••••.•••••.•••••••••• ......................... 1 GEOLOGIC~ REPORT. • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 9 General Statement ••••••• 9 Collateral Studies •• 12 Eastern Con tact Zone . .....................................•.... 15 Country rocks of the anorthosite massif and anorthosite contacts in the Ford Harbour Region (de Waard) ••••••••••••••••••••• 15 Intrusive contact relations in the outer is lands (Wlleele r) ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • 62237 Troctolitic Anorthosite 62.4 Grams
    62237 Troctolitic Anorthosite 62.4 grams Figure 1: Photo of 62237. NASA S72-41797 (B&W), NASA S72-38959 (color). Cube is 1 cm. Introduction 62237 and 62236 are chalky white rocks that were Warren and Wasson (1977) concluded that 62237 is collected together along with 62235 and incidental soil, “chemically pristine”, because it was lacking in from the rim of Buster Crater, station 2, Apollo 16 meteoritic siderophiles. (figure 2), where they were found half buried in the regolith (Sutton 1981). The mineral chemistry of these 62237 has been crushed to form a cataclastic texture, rocks is similar and indicates that they belong to the but, in places, the original coarse-grained igneous suite of lunar plutonic rocks termed ferroan anorthosite texture can be discerned by relic clasts (figure 3). (James 1980). Mineralogy Olivine: Olivine (Fo ) crystals up to 3 mm in size Petrography 59-61 Dymek et al. (1975) concluded that 62237 was a slowly are reported in 62237 by Dymek et al. (1975). Warren cooled plutonic lunar rock (figure 1). The mineralogy and Wasson (1977) and Bersch et al. (1991) also of 62237 is that of a ferroan anorthosite with fairly provided analyses of olivine in 62237. Dymek et al. abundant (~20%) mafic minerals (figure 5). noted that olivine in 62237 was extremely depleted in Ca. Lunar Sample Compendium C Meyer 2011 Figure 2: Location of 62237. Pyroxene: Dymek et al. (1975) and Bersch et al. (1991) determined the composition of pyroxene in 62237 (figure 4). Plagioclase: Plagioclase in 62237 is An95-99 and contains only small amount of minor elements (Dymek et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Nickel Content of an Alaskan Basic Rock
    If yon do not need this publication after it has served your purpose, please return it to the Geological Survey, using the official mailing label at the end UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 897 D NICKEL CONTENT OF AN ALASKAN BASIC ROCK BY JOHN C. REED Mineral resources of Alaska, 1936 (Pages 263-268) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1939 ?For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. ....... Price 5 cent! CONTENTS Page- Abstract__----------__...__-_--_--__--___-._--_._..__.____ 265 Location and general features.__--_--_------__-_-__---_-_--___-_-___ 263 Petrographic studies-______-_-__---_--_-----___---_--_-__-____-____ 265- Chemical analyses----___-_-__-_-_--__-_---_-____-_____-___________ 267 Conclusions_ _ ___-_________________-_____-_--_-____-___--___----__ 268- ILLUSTRATION Page FIGURE 11. Index map showing location of nickel-bearing sill on Admiralty Island.. ....... ______________--..________ 264 NICKEL CONTENT OF AN ALASKAN BASIC ROCK By JOHN C. REED ABSTRACT A nickel-bearing sill, about 126 feet thick, lies in a thick sequence of greenstone schists, graphitic phyllites, and quartzites near the north end of Admiralty Island not far from Juneau, Alaska. Petrographic measurements show that volumetrically the rock is made up of about 62.07 percent labradprite, 34.22 percent olivine, 2.42 percent pyroxene, 0.79 percent pyrrhotite, 0.21 percent magnetite, 0.14 percent chalcopyrite, and 0.06 percent pentlandite.
    [Show full text]
  • Babbitt Se.Indd
    Prepared and Published with the Support of MISCELLANEOUS MAP SERIES THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AS PART OF THE 2004 STATE GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROGRAM ELEMENT (STATEMAP) MAP M-162 MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE NATIONAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROGRAM Bedrock Geology, Babbitt SE Quadrangle Harvey Thorleifson, Director �� ��� BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF THE BABBITT SOUTHEAST QUADRANGLE, ��� �� ��� ��� �� �� �� �� ST. LOUIS AND LAKE COUNTIES, MINNESOTA �� �� �� ��� �� By �� ��� �� ��� ��� �� �� James D. Miller, Jr. �� �� �� �� ��� 2005 �� �� ��� �� ��� �� �� ��� ������������������������ MAP SYMBOLS ����������� Geologic contact—Approximately located by outcrop control. ��� ��������� �� ��� ��������� Geologic contact—Poorly located by rare outcrop, topography, and/or ����������� �� ��� ����� geophysical data. ��������� �� ��� Fault—Inferred, based on geologic offset, topography, local structures, ��� �� ������� ��� ��� ����� and/or geophysical data. ��� ��� ������ ��� ��� ���������� Fault—Speculative, based on geophysical data and/or topography. ��� ��������� ������ Attitude of inclined sedimentary or volcanic bedding ��� ������� � ���������� �� �� Attitude of inclined igneous layering ��� ��� ��� ������ ��������� ��������������� Attitude of igneous foliation (inclined, horizontal) �� ��� Trend of igneous fabric ��� ��� ��� ��� ������������� Attitude of inclined bedding-parallel joint set ��� ��� ������ Attitude of vertical mineralized joint ��� �� �� �� Attitude of inclined felsic dike ��� ��� ��� Area of bedrock outcrop �� �� ��� ��� ����������� Drill hole
    [Show full text]
  • Mafic and Ultramafic Igneous Rocks of the Raisduoddar- Halti Area in the Finnish-Norwegian Caledonides
    MAFIC AND ULTRAMAFIC IGNEOUS ROCKS OF THE RAISDUODDAR- HALTI AREA IN THE FINNISH-NORWEGIAN CALEDONIDES. PETROGRAPHY, MINERALOGY AND GEOCHEMISTRY PEKKA SIPILÄ SIPILÄ, PEKKA, 1991: Mafic and ultramafic igneous rocks of the Raisduoddar- Halti area in the Finnish-Norwegian caledonides. Petrography, mineralogy and geochemistry. Bull. Geo!. Soc. Finland 63, Part 1, 15—24. The mafic and ultramafic rocks in the Raisduoddar-Halti area constitute a shal- low horizontal allochthonous plate in the highest tectono-stratigraphic position of the Finnish Caledonides. They are located close to the boundary of the lower part of the Vaddas Nappe in the Upper Allochthon and the Kalak Nappe Complex in the Middle Allochthon. The mafic and ultramafic rocks in the area are Ridnitsohk- ka gabbro sills in the east and dunite-troctolite-olivine gabbro cumulates at Rais- duoddar-Halti. They are syngenetic and belong to the same nappe. The lower con- tact with the Nabar schists of the Kalak Nappe Complex on the cumulate side is distinctly tectonic and may continue as a tectonic contact in the sill area, too. The gabbro sills, which are tholeiitic in chemical composition, are enriched in LREE and show a small positive Eu anomaly. Close to the cumulate the gabbro sills contain olivine. The cumulate massif crystallized mainly as a closed system, as shown by the linear change in the composition of the rocks and minerals. The cumulates are in- truded by coarse grained gabbro pegmatoids. The same pegmatoid magma gave rise to the metasomatic olivine gabbro with augite porphyroblasts between the cu- mulate massif and the sill area. Before last nappe movements the rocks of the cu- mulate massif were partly amphibolitized across the lithologic contacts and mag- matic layering.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology, Mineralization, and Geostatistics of the Minnamax/Babbitt Cu-Ni Deposit (Local Boy Area), Minnesota
    GEOLOGY, MINERALIZATION, AND GEOSTATISTICS OF THE MINNAMAX/BABBITT CU-NI DEPOSIT (LOCAL BOY AREA), MINNESOTA PART II: MINERALIZATION AND GEOSTATISTICS By Mark J. Severson and Randal J. Barnes* June 1991 Technical Report NRRI/TR-91/13b Funded by Minnesota Technology, Incorporated (Formerly the Greater Minnesota Corporation) Natural Resources Research Institute *Dept. of Civil & Mineral Engineering University of Minnesota, Duluth University of Minnesota 5013 Miller Trunk Highway 500 Pillsbury Drive S. E. Duluth, Minnesota 55811 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 ABSTRACT The Minnamax/Babbitt Cu-Ni deposit, located within the Partridge River Troctolite Series (PRTS) of the Duluth Complex, northeastern Minnesota, contains both troctolite-hosted disseminated ore and footwall-hosted massive sulfide ore. This report pertains to the massive sulfide ore zone, which is restricted to a small portion of the deposit, and is referred to as the Local Boy area. Studies conducted in the Local Boy area include: 1) detailed geologic relogging of drill core; 2) sulfide petrography and microprobe analysis; 3) assaying for Pt, Pd, Au, and Ag in the high-grade Cu ore zones; and 4) geostatistical analysis of the Cu-Ni ore (plus PGEs and precious metals). Detailed relogging of 76 underground drill holes, along with pertinent surface drill holes, has been completed within the Local Boy area (from drifts B, C, and D). The data indicates the highly undulatory nature of the basal contact of the Duluth Complex with the footwall Virginia Formation. Intrusive rocks of the Duluth Complex (Unit I of the PRTS) consist of augite troctolite, troctolite, and norite. All exhibit gradational contacts with each other, and all may occur at any stratigraphic position relative to the undulatory basal contact.
    [Show full text]
  • IODP Expedition 305 Preliminary Report
    Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Expedition 305 Preliminary Report Oceanic Core Complex Formation, Atlantis Massif Oceanic core complex formation, Atlantis Massif, Mid-Atlantic Ridge: drilling into the footwall and hanging wall of a tectonic exposure of deep, young oceanic lithosphere to study deformation, alteration, and melt generation 8 January–2 March 2005 Expedition Scientific Party PUBLISHER’S NOTES Material in this publication may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, educational, or personal research purposes; however, this source should be appropriately acknowledged. Citation: Expedition Scientific Party, 2005. Oceanic core complex formation, Atlantis Massif—oceanic core complex formation, Atlantis Massif, Mid-Atlantic Ridge: drilling into the footwall and hanging wall of a tectonic exposure of deep, young oceanic lithosphere to study deformation, alteration, and melt generation. IODP Prel. Rept., 305. http://iodp.tamu.edu/publications/PR/305PR/305PR.PDF. Distribution: Electronic copies of this series may be obtained from the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Publication Services homepage on the World Wide Web at iodp.tamu.edu/publications. This publication was prepared by the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program U.S. Implementing Organization (IODP-USIO): Joint Oceanographic Institutions, Inc., Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, and Texas A&M University, as an account of work performed under the international Integrated Ocean Drilling Program, which is managed by IODP Management International (IODP-MI), Inc. Funding for the program is provided by the following agencies: European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD) Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), People’s Republic of China U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 2 Classification of Igneous Rocks
    Lecture 2 Classification of Igneous Rocks Friday, January 28th, 2005 Classification of Igneous Rocks Figure 2-1a. Method #1 for plotting a point with the components: 70% X, 20% Y, and 10% Z on triangular diagrams. An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology, John Winter, Prentice Hall. 1 Classification of Igneous Rocks Ratio of Y to Z = 100Y(Y + Z) = 100*20(20 + 10) = 67 Figure 2-1b. Method #2 for plotting a point with the components: 70% X, 20% Y, and 10% Z on triangular diagrams. An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology, John Winter, Prentice Hall. Q (a) The rock must contain a total of at least 10% of the minerals below. Quartzolite Renormalize to 100% 90 90 Quartz-rich Granitoid Classification of 60 60 Tonalite Granite Grano- Igneous Rocks diorite Alkali Feldspar Granite Alkali Fs. 20 20 Qtz. Diorite/ Quartz Syenite Quartz Quartz Quartz Qtz. Gabbro Foids are feldspathoids Alkali Fs. Syenite Monzonite Monzodiorite 5 5 Diorite/Gabbro/ Syenite Syenite Monzodiorite such as nepheline and 10 35 Monzonite 65 90 Anorthosite A (Foid)-bearing (Foid)-bearing (Foid)-bearing P leucite Syenite Monzonite Monzodiorite 10 10 (Foid)-bearing Diorite/Gabbro (Foid)-bearing (Foid) Syenite Alkali Fs. Syenite (Foid) (Foid) Monzosyenite Monzodiorite (Foid) Gabbro Figure 2-2. A classification of the phaneritic igneous 60 60 rocks. a. Phaneritic rocks with more than 10% (quartz + (Foid)olites feldspar + feldspathoids). After IUGS. F 2 Let’s try an example Modal analysis of a rock gives the following mineral proportions Quartz = 26.9 K-feldspar = 23.7 Plagioclase = 39.8 Biotite = 5.3 Hornblende = 4.3 Re-summing Qtz = 29.8 Kspar = 26.2 Plag = 44.0 100P/(P + A) = 63 Rock is a granite! How about another? Modal analysis of a rock gives the following mineral proportions Quartz = 8.5 K-feldspar = 5.1 Plagioclase = 59.6 Biotite = 16.1 Hornblende = 10.9 Re-summing Qtz = 11.6 Kspar = 7.0 Plag = 81.4 100P/(P + A) = 92 Rock could be Qtz diorite or Qtz gabbro 3 Classification of Igneous Rocks Plagioclase Anorthosite Figure 2-2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Duluth Complex in the Gabbro Lake Quadrangle, Minnesota
    Property oJ Bruce Olsen MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PAUL K. SIMS, Diredor THE DULUTH COMPLEX IN THE GABBRO LAKE QUADRANGLE, MINNESOTA w. C. Phinney Report of Investigations 9 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS • 1969 THE DULUTH COMPLEX IN THE GABBRO LAKE QUADRANGLE, MINNESOTA Text to accompany Minnesota Geological Survey MAP M- 2 PUBLISHED IN COOPERATION WITH MINNESOTA DE PAR TMENT OF IRON RANGE RESOURCES AND REHABILITA nON CONTENTS Page Abstract ________ _ Introduction ______ _ 2 Previous Investigations _ _ ___ _ 3 General Geologic Relations __________________ _ 4 Rock Units _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5 Anorthositic Rocks ______________________ _ 5 Bald Eagle Intrusion __ _ 10 South Kawishiwi Intrusion 13 Smaller Intrus ives 18 Economic Geology _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 19 References Cited _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 20 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map of part of northeastern Minnesota showing location of Gabbro Lake quadrangle _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 TABLES Table 1. Average modes, in volume percent, of units in the Duluth Complex, Gabbro Lake quadrangle _ _ _ _ _ _ 7 2. Compositions of minerals in the Duluth Complex, Gabbro Lake quadrangle ___________ - _ _ _ 9 iii THE DULUTH COMPLEX IN THE GABBRO LAKE QUADRANGLE, MINNESOTA w. C. Phinney ABSTRACT Mapping of the lower part of the Duluth C01rtplex in the Gabbro Lake 15 -minute quadrangle, near Ely, Minnesota, shows a series of mafic intrusions against a basal contact of older Giants Range Granite.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Controls on the Primary Distribution of Mafic–Ultramafic
    Ore Geology Reviews 64 (2015) 354–386 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ore Geology Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oregeorev Structural controls on the primary distribution of mafic–ultramafic intrusions containing Ni–Cu–Co–(PGE) sulfide mineralization in the roots of large igneous provinces Peter C. Lightfoot a, Dawn Evans-Lamswood b a Vale, Exploration, Highway 17 West, Sudbury, Ontario P0M 1N0, Canada b Vale Newfoundland and Labrador Limited, 10 Fort William Place, Baine Johnston Centre, Suite 700, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1C 1K, Canada article info abstract Article history: Deposits of Ni–Cu–Co–(PGE) sulfide often occur in association with small differentiated intrusions that reside Received 27 May 2014 within local transtensional spaces in strike-slip fault zones. These faults often develop in response to incipient Received in revised form 15 July 2014 rifting of the crust and the development of large igneous provinces due to far-field stresses generated by Accepted 17 July 2014 plume-induced continental drift. We review the geology of a number of large and small nickel sulfide deposits Available online 27 July 2014 and the associated intrusions, and show that the geometry of the host intrusion and localization of the mineral fi Keywords: zones can be classi ed into three main groups. Further, we show that the morphology of each is controlled by Small mafic–ultramafic intrusions space created in response to deformation on structures. Nickel sulfide deposits One group of intrusions has the plan shape of an asymmetric rhomboid with the long axis sub-parallel to a fault Chonolith zone, and contacts which have often been structurally modified during and/or after emplacement of the magma.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical and Thermal Analysis of Troctolite, Hamragarðaheiði, Eyjafjöll, Iceland
    Chemical and thermal analysis of troctolite, Hamragarðaheiði, Eyjafjöll, Iceland Viktor Þór Georgsson Faculty of Earth Science University of Iceland 2016 Chemical and thermal analysis of troctolite, Hamragarðaheiði, Eyjafjöll, Iceland Viktor Þór Georgsson 10ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of Baccalaureus Scientiarum degree in Geology Advisor Enikő Bali Faculty of Earth Science School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavík, June 2016 Chemical and thermal analyses of troctolite, Hamragarðaheiði, Eyjafjöll, Iceland Chemical and thermal analyses of troctolite 10ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of Baccalaureus Scientiarum degree in Geology Copyright © 2016 Viktor Þór Georgsson All rights reserved Faculty of Earth Science School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Askja, Sturlugata 7 101 Reykjavík Telephone: 525 4000 Registration information: Viktor Þór Georgsson, 2016, Chemical and thermal analysis of troctolite, Hamragarðaheiði, Eyjafjöll, Iceland, BS thesis, Faculty of Earth science, University of Iceland, 58 pages. Printing: Háskólaprent Reykjavík, May 2016 Abstract This study describes the minerals in a troctolite xenolith from Hamragarðaheiði, Iceland, and its melt inclusions. Studies of xenoliths from deep inside the crust provide an interesting picture on crustal structure and on the mantle-crust interaction (Gurenko & Sobolev, 2006). Previous studies and available literature on Icelandic crustal xenoliths are rare, this thesis provides additional knowledge to that list and furthers the understanding on mantle-crust relations beneath Iceland. Olivine in the troctolite have Fo61.6-78.2 showing high MgO concentration of 30.45-41.32 wt%, and FeO ranging from 20.16-33.83 wt%. Plagioclase are mostly labradorite and bytownite with An41.75-87.37. Al2O3 was measured in the range of 26.64-36.15 wt.% and CaO had a wide range of 9.39-18.77 wt.%.
    [Show full text]