Troctolite 76535 Is Without Doubt the Most Interesting (Figure 2)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Moon Minerals a Visual Guide
Moon Minerals a visual guide A.G. Tindle and M. Anand Preliminaries Section 1 Preface Virtual microscope work at the Open University began in 1993 meteorites, Martian meteorites and most recently over 500 virtual and has culminated in the on-line collection of over 1000 microscopes of Apollo samples. samples available via the virtual microscope website (here). Early days were spent using LEGO robots to automate a rotating microscope stage thanks to the efforts of our colleague Peter Whalley (now deceased). This automation speeded up image capture and allowed us to take the thousands of photographs needed to make sizeable (Earth-based) virtual microscope collections. Virtual microscope methods are ideal for bringing rare and often unique samples to a wide audience so we were not surprised when 10 years ago we were approached by the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council who asked us to prepare a virtual collection of the 12 Moon rocks they loaned out to schools and universities. This would turn out to be one of many collections built using extra-terrestrial material. The major part of our extra-terrestrial work is web-based and we The authors - Mahesh Anand (left) and Andy Tindle (middle) with colleague have build collections of Europlanet meteorites, UK and Irish Peter Whalley (right). Thank you Peter for your pioneering contribution to the Virtual Microscope project. We could not have produced this book without your earlier efforts. 2 Moon Minerals is our latest output. We see it as a companion volume to Moon Rocks. Members of staff -
Workshop on Geology of the Apollo 17 Landing Site
NASA-CR-191637 \ WORKSHOP ON GEOLOGY OF THE APOLLO 17 LANDING SITE (NASA-CR-191637) WORKSHOP ON N93-18786 GEOLOGY OF THE APOLLO 17 LANDING --THRU-- SITE (Lunar Science Inst.) 70 p N93-18817 Unclas G3/91 0141290 __ LPI Technical Report Number 92-09, Part 1 LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE 3600 BAY AREA BOULEVARD HOUSTON TX 77058-1113 LPI/TR--92-09, Part 1 WORKSHOP ON GEOLOGY OF THE APOLLO 17 LANDING SITE Edited by G. Ryder, H. H. Schmitt, and P. D. Spudis Held at Houston, Texas December 2-4, 1992 Sponsored by Lunar and Planetary Sample Team Lunar and Planetary Institute Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Technical Report Number 92-09, Part 1 LPI/TR--92-09, Part 1 Compiledin 1992by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE TheInstituteis operatedby theUniversitySpaceResearchAssociationunderContractNo. NASW- 4574with theNationalAeronauticsandSpaceAdministration. Materialin this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or per- sonal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. This report may be cited as Ryder G., Schmitt H. H., and Spudis P. D., eds. (1992) Workshop on Geology of the Apollo 17 Landing Site. LPI Tech. Rpt. 92-09, Part 1, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. 63 pp. This report is distributed by ORDER DEPARTMENT Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 Mail order requestors will be invoiced for the cost of shipping and handling. Cover: Station 4 at Taurus-LiUrow, Apollo 17 landing site. -
Geomorphology of the Bushveld Complex
Cademo Lab. Xeo16xico de Laxe Coruña. 1997. Vol. 22, pp. 209-227 Geomorphology of the Bushveld Complex Geomorfología del Complejo de Bushveld LAGEAT,Y. This paper deals wich che differenc relacion becween scruccure and lichology in che geomorphology of che Bushveld Complexo The final resules demonscrace chac, even so differenc scale ofsize, widerfor che epirogenic-cecconic movements and smaller for che lichology, che cwo faccors need co be considered for a beccer underscanding ofche landscape evolucion ofche area. Key words: ulerabasic and basic rocks, Bushveld Complex, scruccural geomorphology, lichological differences. LAGEAT, Y. (Universicé Blaise Pascaland UPRES-A 6042 (CNRS). Clermont-Ferrand (France) 210 Lageat, Y. CAD. LAB. XEOL. LAXE 22 (997) INTRODUCTION subdued topography. So, being concerned with the relationships between scenery and In spiteofthestrong emphasisonclimatic structure, the study wil1 consider two topics in French geomorphology since the different but complementary topics: fifties, research dealing with structural differential erosion and regional evolution landforms developed in crystalline shields ofa shield area (Y. LAGEAT, 1989). pioneered by the late Professor P. Birot has been upheld. In numerous regional monographs, widely distributed between GEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL theArcticCircleand theTropicofCapricorn, special attention has been devoted to the A presentation of the geology of the relationships between landforms and Bushveld Complex is essential to any geological structure, with the purpose to understanding of its surface morphology. distinguish between the direct control of Ranging in composition from ultrabasic ro recent faulting and the response of acid, it outcrops largely within a region contrasting rock units todifferential erosiono covered bya characteristicvegetation termed This ambiguity may be easily overcome in «Bushveld». -
Constraining the Evolutionary History of the Moon and the Inner Solar System: a Case for New Returned Lunar Samples
Space Sci Rev (2019) 215:54 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-019-0622-x Constraining the Evolutionary History of the Moon and the Inner Solar System: A Case for New Returned Lunar Samples Romain Tartèse1 · Mahesh Anand2,3 · Jérôme Gattacceca4 · Katherine H. Joy1 · James I. Mortimer2 · John F. Pernet-Fisher1 · Sara Russell3 · Joshua F. Snape5 · Benjamin P. Weiss6 Received: 23 August 2019 / Accepted: 25 November 2019 / Published online: 2 December 2019 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract The Moon is the only planetary body other than the Earth for which samples have been collected in situ by humans and robotic missions and returned to Earth. Scien- tific investigations of the first lunar samples returned by the Apollo 11 astronauts 50 years ago transformed the way we think most planetary bodies form and evolve. Identification of anorthositic clasts in Apollo 11 samples led to the formulation of the magma ocean concept, and by extension the idea that the Moon experienced large-scale melting and differentiation. This concept of magma oceans would soon be applied to other terrestrial planets and large asteroidal bodies. Dating of basaltic fragments returned from the Moon also showed that a relatively small planetary body could sustain volcanic activity for more than a billion years after its formation. Finally, studies of the lunar regolith showed that in addition to contain- ing a treasure trove of the Moon’s history, it also provided us with a rich archive of the past 4.5 billion years of evolution of the inner Solar System. Further investigations of samples returned from the Moon over the past five decades led to many additional discoveries, but also raised new and fundamental questions that are difficult to address with currently avail- able samples, such as those related to the age of the Moon, duration of lunar volcanism, the Role of Sample Return in Addressing Major Questions in Planetary Sciences Edited by Mahesh Anand, Sara Russell, Yangting Lin, Meenakshi Wadhwa, Kuljeet Kaur Marhas and Shogo Tachibana B R. -
The Nain Anorthosite Project, Labrador: Field
THE NAIN ANORTHOSITE PROJECT, LABRADOR: FIELD REPORT 1971 S. A. MORSE I EDITOR R. V. PITS I ULAK CONTRIBUTION NO. 9 GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST, MASSACHUSETTS L THE NAIN ANORTHOSITE PROJECT, LABRADOR: FIElD REPORT 1971 S. A. Morse, Editor Final Report under NSF Grants GA-21386 and GA-27134 to Franklin and Marshall College: "Evolution of Anorthosite and Related Crustal Rocks in Coastal Labrador", and "Facility for Crustal Studies in Coastal Labrador." S. A. Morse, Principal Investigator (now at U.Mass/Amherst) Dirk de Waard, Syracuse Associate Investigators E. P. Wheeler 2nd, Cornell Other contributors: Research Assistants: J. H. Berg, U. Mass/Amherst C. D. Brauer, Vassar G. A. Plananaky, Harvard F. Finley, Syracuse C. C. Rubins, Syracuse T. H. Folkomer, Franklin & Marshall B.G.J. Upton, Edinburgh D. Russell, Syracuse Charles Woodward, Syracuse J. A. Speer, Virginia Polytechnic Contribution No. 9 Amherst, Massachusetts Geology Department December, 1971 Uni~ersity of Massachusetts L I - CONTENTS INTRODUCTION •••••••••.•••••.•••••••••• ......................... 1 GEOLOGIC~ REPORT. • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 9 General Statement ••••••• 9 Collateral Studies •• 12 Eastern Con tact Zone . .....................................•.... 15 Country rocks of the anorthosite massif and anorthosite contacts in the Ford Harbour Region (de Waard) ••••••••••••••••••••• 15 Intrusive contact relations in the outer is lands (Wlleele r) .................................... -
Water in Lunar Anorthosites and Evidence for a Wet Early Moon
LETTERS PUBLISHED ONLINE: 17 FEBRUARY 2013 | DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1735 Water in lunar anorthosites and evidence for a wet early Moon Hejiu Hui1*, Anne H. Peslier2,3, Youxue Zhang4 and Clive R. Neal1 The Moon was thought to be anhydrous since the Apollo era1, the water content of the bulk lunar magma ocean (LMO) was less but this view has been challenged by detections of water on (possibly far less) than 100 ppm and water was later added during the lunar surface2–4 and in volcanic rocks5–9 and regolith10. Part mantle cumulate overturn or through impacts11. of this water is thought to have been brought through solar- Here we have measured water in primary products of the wind implantation2–4,7,10 and meteorite impacts2,3,7,11, long after LMO, thereby bypassing the processes of later addition of water the primary lunar crust formed from the cooling magma to the Moon through impact events or during mantle overturn as ocean12,13. Here we show that this primary crust of the Moon suggested by previous studies7,11. These data are used to estimate contains significant amounts of water. We analysed plagioclase the water content of the Moon's interior at the time of the magma grains in lunar anorthosites thought to sample the primary ocean, as well as that of the mare magma source regions. So far, crust, obtained in the Apollo missions, using Fourier-transform ferroan anorthosite (FAN) is the only available lithology that is infrared spectroscopy, and detected approximately 6 ppm believed to be a primary product of the LMO (refs 12,13). -
62237 Troctolitic Anorthosite 62.4 Grams
62237 Troctolitic Anorthosite 62.4 grams Figure 1: Photo of 62237. NASA S72-41797 (B&W), NASA S72-38959 (color). Cube is 1 cm. Introduction 62237 and 62236 are chalky white rocks that were Warren and Wasson (1977) concluded that 62237 is collected together along with 62235 and incidental soil, “chemically pristine”, because it was lacking in from the rim of Buster Crater, station 2, Apollo 16 meteoritic siderophiles. (figure 2), where they were found half buried in the regolith (Sutton 1981). The mineral chemistry of these 62237 has been crushed to form a cataclastic texture, rocks is similar and indicates that they belong to the but, in places, the original coarse-grained igneous suite of lunar plutonic rocks termed ferroan anorthosite texture can be discerned by relic clasts (figure 3). (James 1980). Mineralogy Olivine: Olivine (Fo ) crystals up to 3 mm in size Petrography 59-61 Dymek et al. (1975) concluded that 62237 was a slowly are reported in 62237 by Dymek et al. (1975). Warren cooled plutonic lunar rock (figure 1). The mineralogy and Wasson (1977) and Bersch et al. (1991) also of 62237 is that of a ferroan anorthosite with fairly provided analyses of olivine in 62237. Dymek et al. abundant (~20%) mafic minerals (figure 5). noted that olivine in 62237 was extremely depleted in Ca. Lunar Sample Compendium C Meyer 2011 Figure 2: Location of 62237. Pyroxene: Dymek et al. (1975) and Bersch et al. (1991) determined the composition of pyroxene in 62237 (figure 4). Plagioclase: Plagioclase in 62237 is An95-99 and contains only small amount of minor elements (Dymek et al. -
Nickel Content of an Alaskan Basic Rock
If yon do not need this publication after it has served your purpose, please return it to the Geological Survey, using the official mailing label at the end UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 897 D NICKEL CONTENT OF AN ALASKAN BASIC ROCK BY JOHN C. REED Mineral resources of Alaska, 1936 (Pages 263-268) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1939 ?For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. ....... Price 5 cent! CONTENTS Page- Abstract__----------__...__-_--_--__--___-._--_._..__.____ 265 Location and general features.__--_--_------__-_-__---_-_--___-_-___ 263 Petrographic studies-______-_-__---_--_-----___---_--_-__-____-____ 265- Chemical analyses----___-_-__-_-_--__-_---_-____-_____-___________ 267 Conclusions_ _ ___-_________________-_____-_--_-____-___--___----__ 268- ILLUSTRATION Page FIGURE 11. Index map showing location of nickel-bearing sill on Admiralty Island.. ....... ______________--..________ 264 NICKEL CONTENT OF AN ALASKAN BASIC ROCK By JOHN C. REED ABSTRACT A nickel-bearing sill, about 126 feet thick, lies in a thick sequence of greenstone schists, graphitic phyllites, and quartzites near the north end of Admiralty Island not far from Juneau, Alaska. Petrographic measurements show that volumetrically the rock is made up of about 62.07 percent labradprite, 34.22 percent olivine, 2.42 percent pyroxene, 0.79 percent pyrrhotite, 0.21 percent magnetite, 0.14 percent chalcopyrite, and 0.06 percent pentlandite. -
Water in Evolved Lunar Rocks a Dissertation Submitted To
WATER IN EVOLVED LUNAR ROCKS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIʻI AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS MAY 2015 By Katharine Lynn Robinson Dissertation Committee: G. Jeffrey Taylor, Chairperson Gary R. Huss Kazuhide Nagashima Eric Hellebrand Michael J. Mottl Keywords: Moon; Lunar water; Evolved rocks; Hydrogen isotopes; Felsites; Lunar evolution ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration through the NASA Astrobiology Institute under Cooperative Agreement No. NNA09DA77A issued through the Office of Space Science, and by NASA Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research Grants NNX11AE85G and NNX08AY88G to G. Jeffrey Taylor. I also received funding from the Fred M. Bullard Graduate Fellowship and Subagreement No. 02235-03 on Award number NNA14AB07A (NASA SSERVI). On a more personal note, I would like to thank my advisor, Jeff Taylor, for being an amazing boss, teacher, and co-author for the past four-odd years. None of this work would have been possible without Jeff, and only Jeff could have made it so much fun. I also thank my past advisors, Albert Colman and Allan Treiman, for teaching me the fundamentals of research and helping me get my foot in the planetary geology door. The Grad Family at large is too numerous to thank individually, but thanks, everyone, for being my surrogate island family. Special thanks to Sarah Crites, Sarah Maher, and Lydia Baker for all the fun, beach days, hugs, and hand- holding through all the usual grad student milestones: quals, comps, conference presentations, and finally, the dissertation defense. -
Development of the Moon Michael B
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 2 2 Why Go to the Moon? Exploration Rationales and Motivations............................................ 3 2.1 Expansion of humans into space..................................................................................... 3 2.2 The Search for Energy Alternatives................................................................................ 6 2.2.1 Solar Power Satellites ............................................................................................. 6 2.2.2 Lunar Power System............................................................................................... 8 2.2.3 3He......................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 The industrialization of space ....................................................................................... 12 2.4 Exploration and development of the Solar System....................................................... 13 2.5 The Moon as a planetary science laboratory................................................................. 15 2.6 Astronomical observatories on the Moon..................................................................... 17 2.7 Maintenance of human health on long-duration missions ............................................ 20 3 Transportation by rocket in the Earth-Moon system ........................................................... -
Further Evidence for Early Lunar Magnetism from Troctolite 76535
PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets RESEARCH ARTICLE Further evidence for early lunar magnetism 10.1002/2016JE005154 from troctolite 76535 Key Points: Ian Garrick-Bethell1,2, Benjamin P. Weiss3, David L. Shuster4,5, Sonia M. Tikoo6, and • Using mutually oriented subsamples 4,5 of lunar troctolite 76535, we find Marissa M. Tremblay further evidence for a dynamo on the 1 2 Moon 4.25 Ga Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, School of Space 3 • We find that the magnetizing field had Research, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si, South Korea, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, a paleointensity of 20-40 microteslas Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 4Department of Earth and Planetary Science, 40 39 • New Ar/ Ar thermochronometry University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA, 5Berkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley, California, USA, measurements provide an improved 6 sample age estimate of 4249 {plus Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway Township, New Jersey, USA minus} 12 Ma Abstract The earliest history of the lunar dynamo is largely unknown and has important implications Supporting Information: for the thermal state of the Moon and the physics of dynamo generation. The lunar sample with the • Supporting Information S1 oldest known paleomagnetic record is the 4.25 billion year old (Ga) troctolite 76535. Previous studies of fi Correspondence to: unoriented subsamples of 76535 found evidence for a dynamo eld with a paleointensity of several tens I. Garrick-Bethell, of microteslas. However, the lack of mutual subsample orientation prevented a demonstration that the [email protected] magnetization was unidirectional, a key property of thermoremanent magnetization. -
Babbitt Se.Indd
Prepared and Published with the Support of MISCELLANEOUS MAP SERIES THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AS PART OF THE 2004 STATE GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROGRAM ELEMENT (STATEMAP) MAP M-162 MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE NATIONAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROGRAM Bedrock Geology, Babbitt SE Quadrangle Harvey Thorleifson, Director �� ��� BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF THE BABBITT SOUTHEAST QUADRANGLE, ��� �� ��� ��� �� �� �� �� ST. LOUIS AND LAKE COUNTIES, MINNESOTA �� �� �� ��� �� By �� ��� �� ��� ��� �� �� James D. Miller, Jr. �� �� �� �� ��� 2005 �� �� ��� �� ��� �� �� ��� ������������������������ MAP SYMBOLS ����������� Geologic contact—Approximately located by outcrop control. ��� ��������� �� ��� ��������� Geologic contact—Poorly located by rare outcrop, topography, and/or ����������� �� ��� ����� geophysical data. ��������� �� ��� Fault—Inferred, based on geologic offset, topography, local structures, ��� �� ������� ��� ��� ����� and/or geophysical data. ��� ��� ������ ��� ��� ���������� Fault—Speculative, based on geophysical data and/or topography. ��� ��������� ������ Attitude of inclined sedimentary or volcanic bedding ��� ������� � ���������� �� �� Attitude of inclined igneous layering ��� ��� ��� ������ ��������� ��������������� Attitude of igneous foliation (inclined, horizontal) �� ��� Trend of igneous fabric ��� ��� ��� ��� ������������� Attitude of inclined bedding-parallel joint set ��� ��� ������ Attitude of vertical mineralized joint ��� �� �� �� Attitude of inclined felsic dike ��� ��� ��� Area of bedrock outcrop �� �� ��� ��� ����������� Drill hole