DOCSLIB.ORG

Structural Changes in Banking After the Crisis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Structural Changes in Banking After the Crisis Committee on the Global Financial System CGFS Papers No 60 Structural changes in banking after the crisis Report prepared by a Working Group established by the Committee on the Global Financial System The Group was chaired by Claudia Buch (Deutsche Bundesbank) and B Gerard Dages (Federal Reserve Bank of New York) January 2018 JEL Classification: G21, G24, G32, L25 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2018. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISBN 978-92-9259-131-1 (online) Preface The experience of the global financial crisis, the post-crisis market environment and changes to regulatory frameworks have had a marked impact on the banking sector globally. In response to their new operating landscape, banks have been re-assessing and adjusting their business strategies and models. At the same time, a number of advanced economy banking systems have to confront low profitability and legacy problems. Against this background, the Committee on the Global Financial System (CGFS) mandated a Working Group chaired by Claudia Buch (Deutsche Bundesbank) and B Gerard Dages (Federal Reserve Bank of New York) to examine trends in bank business models, performance and market structure over the past decade, and assess their implications for the stability and efficiency of banking markets. The following report presents the Group’s conclusions on structural changes in the banking sector after the crisis. The first message is that while many large advanced economy banks have moved away from trading and cross-border activities, there does not appear to be clear evidence of a systemic retrenchment from core credit provision. Second, bank profitability has declined across countries, and individual banks have experienced persistently weak earnings and poor investor sentiment, suggesting a need for further cost cutting and structural adjustments. Supervisors and authorities should monitor banks’ adjustment, assessing any risks that may emerge, but also play a role in facilitating the process by removing impediments where necessary. Third, in line with the intended direction of the regulatory reforms, banks have significantly enhanced their balance sheet and funding resilience and curbed their involvement in certain complex activities. Nonetheless, market participants and authorities should not become complacent about the progress to date and press on with the implementation of reform. The adaption of the banking sector to the post-crisis operating landscape warrants ongoing close attention. I hope that this work provides a useful resource by documenting the state of ongoing structural change in banking, and providing a starting point for further in-depth analysis. William C Dudley Chair, Committee on the Global Financial System President, Federal Reserve Bank of New York CGFS - Structural changes in banking after the crisis iii Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2. An overview of banks’ operating environment ................................................................... 6 2.1 Background on banks’ experience in the financial crisis ....................................... 6 2.2 The post-crisis operating environment for banks .................................................... 7 3. Key trends in banking structure and performance .......................................................... 11 3.1 Banking system size ........................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Banking system concentration ....................................................................................... 13 3.3 Bank business models ....................................................................................................... 14 3.4 International banking ........................................................................................................ 24 3.5 Bank performance ............................................................................................................... 26 3.6 Summary of key trends in banking .............................................................................. 29 4. Implications for the stability of the banking sector ......................................................... 30 4.1 Bank risk buffers and risk-taking .................................................................................. 30 4.2 Bank risk governance and management ................................................................... 33 4.3 Market-based indicators of banks ................................................................................ 35 4.4 Future profitability and resilience of banks .............................................................. 39 4.5 Banking system-level risk and resilience ................................................................... 41 4.6 Overall assessment ............................................................................................................. 50 5. Implications for the efficiency of the banking sector ...................................................... 51 5.1 Bank credit provision to the real economy ............................................................... 51 5.2 Banks’ role in facilitating capital market activity .................................................... 58 5.3 Overall assessment ............................................................................................................. 62 6. Key messages .................................................................................................................................. 64 References ................................................................................................................................................ 70 Annex 1: Country banking data tables .......................................................................................... 77 Annex 2: Individual bank data ....................................................................................................... 115 Annex 3: Business model classification methodology ......................................................... 116 Annex 4: Cost of equity estimation methodology ................................................................ 118 Members of the Working Group .................................................................................................. 119 CGFS - Structural changes in banking after the crisis v Executive summary The decade since the onset of the global financial crisis has brought about significant structural changes in the banking sector. The crisis revealed substantial weaknesses in the banking system and the prudential framework, leading to excessive lending and risk-taking unsupported by adequate capital and liquidity buffers. The effects of the crisis have weighed heavily on economic growth, financial stability and bank performance in many jurisdictions, although the headwinds have begun to subside. Technological change, increased non-bank competition and shifts in globalisation are still broader environmental challenges facing the banking system. Regulators have responded to the crisis by reforming the global prudential framework and enhancing supervision. The key goals of these reforms have been to increase banks’ resilience through stronger capital and liquidity buffers, and reduce implicit public subsidies and the impact of bank failures on the economy and taxpayers through enhanced recovery and resolution regimes. At the same time, the dynamic adaptation of the system and the emergence of new risks warrant ongoing attention. In adapting to their new operating landscape, banks have been re-assessing and adjusting their business strategies and models, including their balance sheet structure, cost base, scope of activities and geographic presence. Some changes have been substantial and are ongoing, while a number of advanced economy banking systems are also confronted with low profitability and legacy problems. This report by the CGFS Working Group examines trends in bank business models, performance and market structure, and assesses their implications for the stability and efficiency of banking markets. The main findings on the evolution of banking sectors are as follows: Changes in banking market capacity and structure. The crisis ended a period of strong growth in banking sector assets in many advanced economies. Several capacity metrics point to a shrinking of banking sectors relative to economic activity in several countries directly impacted by the crisis. This adjustment has occurred mainly through a reduction in business volumes rather than the exit of firms from the market. Banking sectors have expanded in countries that were less affected by the crisis, particularly the large emerging market economies (EMEs). Concentration in banking systems has tended to increase, with some exceptions. Shifts in bank business models. Advanced economy banks have tended to re- orient their business away from trading and more complex activities, towards less capital-intensive activities, including commercial banking. This pattern is evident in the changes in banks’ asset portfolios, revenue mix and increased reliance on
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Financial Institution Bond with Extended Coverages Table of Contents
    Financial Institution Bond with Extended Coverages Table of Contents I. CONSIDERATION CLAUSE ............................................................................................................................................ 3 II. INSURING AGREEMENTS .............................................................................................................................................. 3 A. FIDELITY ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Coverage A.1. Employee Dishonesty ............................................................................................................. 3 Coverage A.2. Trading Loss ............................................................................................................................ 3 Coverage A.3. ERISA ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Coverage A.4. Restoration Expenses ............................................................................................................. 4 B. ON PREMISES ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 C. IN TRANSIT ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 D. FORGERY OR ALTERATION
    [Show full text]
  • 1 My Plan to Cancel Student Loan Debt on Day One of My Presidency We're Facing a Student Loan Crisis
    My Plan to Cancel Student Loan Debt on Day One of My Presidency We’re facing a student loan crisis -- one that’s holding back our economy and crushing millions of American families. I have already proposed bold steps to broadly cancel student loan debt, provide universal tuition free public two- and four-year college and technical school, ban for- profit colleges from receiving federal aid, and help end racial disparities in college enrollment and resources. But the Department of Education already has broad legal authority to cancel student debt, and we can’t afford to wait for Congress to act. So I will start to use existing laws on day one of my presidency to implement my student loan debt cancellation plan that offers relief to 42 million Americans -- in addition to using all available tools to address racial disparities in higher education, crack down on for-profit institutions, and eliminate predatory lending. I spent my career studying why so many hard-working middle-class families were going broke. I discovered that they weren’t reckless or irresponsible -- they were being squeezed by an economy that forced them to take on more debt to cling to their place in America’s middle class. Student debt is no different: for decades, students have worked hard and played by the rules. They took on loans on the promise that a college education would justify their debt and provide a ticket to the middle class. But our country’s experiment with debt-financed education went terribly wrong: instead of getting ahead, millions of student loan borrowers are barely treading water.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics After World War I
    FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO WORKING PAPER SERIES Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics after World War I Jose A. Lopez Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Kris James Mitchener Santa Clara University CAGE, CEPR, CES-ifo & NBER June 2018 Working Paper 2018-06 https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/working-papers/2018/06/ Suggested citation: Lopez, Jose A., Kris James Mitchener. 2018. “Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics after World War I,” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2018-06. https://doi.org/10.24148/wp2018-06 The views in this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics after World War I Jose A. Lopez Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Kris James Mitchener Santa Clara University CAGE, CEPR, CES-ifo & NBER* May 9, 2018 ABSTRACT. Fiscal deficits, elevated debt-to-GDP ratios, and high inflation rates suggest hyperinflation could have potentially emerged in many European countries after World War I. We demonstrate that economic policy uncertainty was instrumental in pushing a subset of European countries into hyperinflation shortly after the end of the war. Germany, Austria, Poland, and Hungary (GAPH) suffered from frequent uncertainty shocks – and correspondingly high levels of uncertainty – caused by protracted political negotiations over reparations payments, the apportionment of the Austro-Hungarian debt, and border disputes. In contrast, other European countries exhibited lower levels of measured uncertainty between 1919 and 1925, allowing them more capacity with which to implement credible commitments to their fiscal and monetary policies.
    [Show full text]
  • (EFT)/Automated Teller Machines (Atms)/Other Electronic Termi
    Page 1 of 1 Effective as of 11/23/18 Information About Your Ulster Savings Bank Money Market Account Balance to Open Your Money Market Account must be opened with a minimum deposit of $2,500.00 Balance to Earn Interest If your daily balance is less than $2,500.00, you will earn the Interest Rate and Annual Percentage Yield in effect, as disclosed to you under separate cover, on the entire balance in your account. If your daily balance is $2,500.00 or more you will earn the higher Interest Rate and Annual Percentage Yield in effect, as disclosed to you under separate cover, on the entire balance in your account. Balance to Avoid Fees Your daily balance for every day of the statement cycle period must be at least $2,500.00 to avoid the imposition of a maintenance fee for that period. Variable Rate Features This is a variable rate account. Your Interest Rate and Annual Percentage Yield may change. The Interest Rate is set based on the Bank's discretion and may change at any time at the Bank's discretion. Interest Computation We use the daily balance method to calculate interest on your account. This method applies a periodic rate to the balance in the account each day. Compounding Period Interest compounds on your account daily, using a 365/360 interest factor. Interest Accrual Interest begins to accrue on the business day you deposit non-cash items, such as checks. Although your account may earn interest each day, you may not withdraw the earnings until the end of the interest crediting period (see Payment of Interest).
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Expected Credit Loss Accounting Standard and Financial Institution Regulatory Capital
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY The Current Expected Credit Loss Accounting Standard and Financial Institution Regulatory Capital September 15, 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 3 I. Background ....................................................................................................................... 6 II. CECL’s Implications for Financial Institution Regulatory Capital .......................... 14 III. Key Areas of Debate ....................................................................................................... 21 IV. Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 25 Executive Summary 3 Executive Summary The current expected credit loss (CECL) methodology is a new accounting standard for estimating allowances for credit losses. CECL currently applies—or will apply—to all entities whose financial statements conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (GAAP), including all banks, credit unions, savings associations, and their holding companies (collectively, “financial institutions”) that file regulatory reports that conform to GAAP. CECL requires financial institutions and other covered entities to recognize lifetime expected credit losses for a wide range of financial assets based not only on past events and current conditions, but also on reasonable and supportable forecasts. Over the
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing the Role of Competition in the Regulation of Banks (1998)
    Enhancing the Role of Competition in Regulation of Banks 1998 The OECD Competition Committee the role of competition in the regulation of banks in February 1998. This document includes an executive summary and submissions from Australia, Austria, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, the European Commission, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Norway, Poland, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States, as well as an aide-memoire of the discussion. The banking sector is one of the most closely regulated sectors of OECD economies. A reason advanced for this close regulation is that small depositors cannot compare risks (or have no incentive to do so, because of deposit insurance), so competition would lead banks to take excessive risks. Controls on risk taking are considered essential to ensure that competition between banks promotes efficient outcomes. Public policy concerns focus on how bank failures could affect small depositors, the payments system and the stability of the financial system as a whole. The goal of promoting or preserving competition might conflict with some actions to deal with bank failures, emergency measures or state aid for failing banks or implicit state support for large banks. In most OECD countries bank regulators and competition authorities are jointly responsible for bank mergers, so interaction and coordination between them are necessary. Because of the political and economic sensitivity of the banking sector, it is perhaps not surprising that some countries apply special competition regimes to it. OECD Council Recommendation on Merger Review (2005) Mergers in Financial Services (2000) Relationship between Regulators and Competition Authorities (1998) Failing Firm Defense (1995) Unclassified DAFFE/CLP(98)16 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques OLIS : 07-Sep-1998 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Dist.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Exploitation
    MAPPING EXPLOITATION Examining For-Profit Colleges as Financial Predators in Communities of Color July 2021 PROTECTBORROWERS.ORG MAPPING EXPLOITATION 2021 Table of Introduction 3 Contents Student Debt is a Crisis for Black and Latino Borrowers and Their Communities 5 For-Profit Colleges are Another Example of Firms Engaging in “Predatory Inclusion" 9 For-Profit Colleges and the Geography of Financial Predation 10 For-Profit Schools Target Communities of Color with Predatory Products That Produce Suboptimal Outcomes 13 Mapping For-Profits in the Midwest 14 Recommendations 26 Conclusion 31 Endnotes 32 2 MAPPING EXPLOITATION 2021 Introduction The country is in the midst of an unprecedented student debt crisis with 45 million borrowers collectively owing more than $1.7 trillion in student debt. Student loan borrowers have been sold the narrative that education is the key to social mobility—that it is “the great equalizer.”1 Meanwhile, the rising cost of higher education has brought with it rising levels of student debt—debt that is often excused or ignored as a personal shortcoming, the result of individual choices rather than a broad array of deep systemic failures.2 These parallel trends perpetuate the narrative that student loan borrowers are not entitled to assistance or that their distress does not merit policymakers’ attention. However, as we have seen time and time again, the vision of higher education as the key to individual opportunity and student debt as “good debt” has consistently failed to account for a host of interconnected
    [Show full text]
  • What Makes a Good ʽbad Bankʼ? the Irish, Spanish and German Experience
    6 ISSN 2443-8022 (online) What Makes a Good ‘Bad Bank’? The Irish, Spanish and German Experience Stephanie Medina Cas, Irena Peresa DISCUSSION PAPER 036 | SEPTEMBER 2016 EUROPEAN ECONOMY Economic and EUROPEAN Financial Affairs ECONOMY European Economy Discussion Papers are written by the staff of the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, or by experts working in association with them, to inform discussion on economic policy and to stimulate debate. The views expressed in this document are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of the European Commission, the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management. Authorised for publication by Carlos Martinez Mongay, Director for Economies of the Member States II. LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained in this publication, or for any errors which, despite careful preparation and checking, may appear. This paper exists in English only and can be downloaded from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). More information on the European Union is available on http://europa.eu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 KC-BD-16-036-EN-N (online) KC-BD-16-036-EN-C (print) ISBN 978-92-79-54444-6 (online) ISBN 978-92-79-54445-3 (print) doi:10.2765/848761 (online) doi:10.2765/850297 (print) © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Reserve System: History and Structure
    Printed Page 253 [Notes/Highlighting] The Federal Reserve System: History and Structure The history of the Federal Reserve System The structure of the Federal Reserve System How the Federal Reserve has responded to major financial crises Module 26: The Federal Reserve System: H... Printed Page 253 The Federal Reserve System [Notes/Highlighting] Who’s in charge of ensuring that banks maintain enough reserves? Who decides how large the monetary base will be? The answer, in the United A central bank is an States, is an institution known as the Federal Reserve (or, informally, as institution that oversees and “the Fed”). The Federal Reserve is a central bank—an institution that regulates the banking system oversees and regulates the banking system, and controls the monetary and controls the monetary base. Other central banks include the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan, base. and the European Central Bank, or ECB. The Federal Reserve System Printed Page 253 An Overview of the Twenty-first Century [Notes/Highlighting] American Banking System Under normal circumstances, banking is a rather staid and unexciting business. Fortunately, bankers and their customers like it that way. However, there have been repeated episodes in which “sheer panic” would be the best description of banking conditions—the panic induced by a bank run and the specter of a collapse of a bank or multiple banks, leaving depositors penniless, bank shareholders wiped out, and borrowers unable to get credit. In this section, we’ll give an overview of the behavior and regulation of the American banking system over the last century.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank: Roadmap for a Sustainable Financial System
    A UN ENVIRONMENT – WORLD BANK GROUP INITIATIVE Public Disclosure Authorized ROADMAP FOR A SUSTAINABLE FINANCIAL SYSTEM Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized NOVEMBER 2017 UN Environment The United Nations Environment Programme is the leading global environmental authority that sets the global environmental agenda, promotes the coherent implementation of the environmental dimension of sustainable development within the United Nations system and serves as an authoritative advocate for the global environment. In January 2014, UN Environment launched the Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System to advance policy options to deliver a step change in the financial system’s effectiveness in mobilizing capital towards a green and inclusive economy – in other words, sustainable development. This report is the third annual global report by the UN Environment Inquiry. The first two editions of ‘The Financial System We Need’ are available at: www.unep.org/inquiry and www.unepinquiry.org. For more information, please contact Mahenau Agha, Director of Outreach ([email protected]), Nick Robins, Co-director ([email protected]) and Simon Zadek, Co-director ([email protected]). The World Bank Group The World Bank Group is one of the world’s largest sources of funding and knowledge for developing countries. Its five institutions share a commitment to reducing poverty, increasing shared prosperity, and promoting sustainable development. Established in 1944, the World Bank Group is headquartered in Washington, D.C. More information is available from Samuel Munzele Maimbo, Practice Manager, Finance & Markets Global Practice ([email protected]) and Peer Stein, Global Head of Climate Finance, Financial Institutions Group ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Research Journal of Finance and Accounting www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1697 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2847 (Online) Vol.6, No.9, 2015 Investigating the Determinant of Return on Assets and Return on Equity and Its Industry Wise Effects in TSE (Tehran Security Exchange Market) Abolfazl Ghadiri Moghadam Mohammad Aranyan Morteza Eslami Mohammadiyeh Tayyebeh Rahati Farzaneh Nematizadeh Morteza Mehtar Islamic Azad University , Mashhad,Iran Abstract The purpose of this study is to find out that from the components of Dupont identity of Return on Equity which one is most consistent or volatile among profit margin, total assets turnover and equity multiplier in Fuel and Energy Sector, Chemicals Sector, Cement Sector, Engineering Sector, Textiles Sector and Transport and Communication Sector of TSE 100 index. The purpose of the study was served by taking data from 2004 to 2012 of 51 companies (falling under six mentioned industries) of TSE 100 as Paradigm of Panel Data. The F-Statistics of One Way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) show that it is Assets Turnover which significantly varies from industry to industry whereas Equity Multiplier and Profit Margin are not much volatile among indifferent industries. Moreover, Adjusted R Square in Panel OLS Analysis has confirmed Industry Effect on Newly established firms from Fuel and Energy Sector, Cement Sector and Transport and Communication Sector whereas others Sectors such as Chemicals Sector, Engineering Sectors and Textiles Sectors does not have that leverage. Keywords: Profitability, Dupont Identity, Panel Least Square JEL Classification : G12, G39, C23 1. Introduction Business is Any activity which is done for the purpose of profit” but the question arises how to calculate profitability as well as comparing the profitability of it with existing firm of industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Concentration and Fragility. Impact and Mechanics
    This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: The Risks of Financial Institutions Volume Author/Editor: Mark Carey and René M. Stulz, editors Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-09285-2 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/care06-1 Conference Date: October 22-23, 2004 Publication Date: January 2007 Title: Bank Concentration and Fragility. Impact and Mechanics Author: Thorsten Beck URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c9610 5 Bank Concentration and Fragility Impact and Mechanics Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirgüç-Kunt, and Ross Levine 5.1 Purposes and Motivation Public policy debates and theoretical disputes motivate this paper’s ex- amination of the relationship between bank concentration and banking system fragility and the mechanisms underlying this relationship. The rapid consolidation of banks around the world is intensifying concerns among policymakers about bank concentration, as reflected in major reports by the Bank for International Settlements (2001), International Monetary Fund (2001), and the Group of Ten (2001). These reports note that concentration may reduce competition in and access to financial ser- vices, increase the market power and political influence of financial con- glomerates, and destabilize financial systems as banks become too big to discipline and use their influence to shape banking regulations and poli- cies. These reports also provide countervailing arguments. Consolidation may improve banking system efficiency and enhance stability as the best banks succeed, diversify, and boost franchise value. Further, some may question whether bank concentration is a reliable indicator of competition in the banking industry. Theoretical disputes parallel these public policy deliberations.
    [Show full text]