DOCSLIB.ORG

1 My Plan to Cancel Student Loan Debt on Day One of My Presidency We're Facing a Student Loan Crisis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 My Plan to Cancel Student Loan Debt on Day One of My Presidency We're Facing a Student Loan Crisis My Plan to Cancel Student Loan Debt on Day One of My Presidency We’re facing a student loan crisis -- one that’s holding back our economy and crushing millions of American families. I have already proposed bold steps to broadly cancel student loan debt, provide universal tuition free public two- and four-year college and technical school, ban for- profit colleges from receiving federal aid, and help end racial disparities in college enrollment and resources. But the Department of Education already has broad legal authority to cancel student debt, and we can’t afford to wait for Congress to act. So I will start to use existing laws on day one of my presidency to implement my student loan debt cancellation plan that offers relief to 42 million Americans -- in addition to using all available tools to address racial disparities in higher education, crack down on for-profit institutions, and eliminate predatory lending. I spent my career studying why so many hard-working middle-class families were going broke. I discovered that they weren’t reckless or irresponsible -- they were being squeezed by an economy that forced them to take on more debt to cling to their place in America’s middle class. Student debt is no different: for decades, students have worked hard and played by the rules. They took on loans on the promise that a college education would justify their debt and provide a ticket to the middle class. But our country’s experiment with debt-financed education went terribly wrong: instead of getting ahead, millions of student loan borrowers are barely treading water. When I got to the Senate, I used every opportunity and every tool available to me to ease the burden of student debt. I fought to lower interest rates, refinance loans, and hold loan servicers and debt collectors accountable for breaking the law and hurting borrowers. I made sure Congress provided $700 million in a relief fund for borrowers who dedicated their lives to public service but missed technical requirements for loan forgiveness, and I fought to cancel loans for 80,000 students who were cheated by Corinthian Colleges. Along the way, I learned two key things. First, the student debt crisis is deeper than many experts thought was possible. And second, the Department of Education has broad authority to end that crisis. When I am president, I plan to use that authority. Here’s how it will work: ● I’ll direct the Secretary of Education to use their authority to begin to compromise and modify federal student loans consistent with my plan to cancel up to $50,000 in debt for 95% of student loan borrowers (about 42 million people). 1 ● I’ll also direct the Secretary of Education to use every existing authority available to rein in the for-profit college industry, crack down on predatory student lending, and combat the racial disparities in our higher education system. Achieving Broad Debt Cancellation through Administrative Authority The Higher Education Act gives the Department of Education the ability to modify, compromise, waive, or release student loans. This authority provides a safety valve for federal student loan programs, letting the Department of Education use its discretion to wipe away loans even when they do not meet the eligibility criteria for more specific cancellation programs like permanent disability discharge. America needs that safety valve now more than ever. Only 43% of public two-year college students, and 34% of for-profit college students who entered repayment on their loans in 2011 had paid even a dollar toward their loan principal after five years. Even among four-year college students, a third of borrowers hadn’t made any payment toward principal in the same time period. According to a September 2019 study, one quarter of all student loan borrowers defaulted on their loans over a 20-year period. Student debt is reducing home ownership rates for young adults and contributing to rural "brain drain," leading to fewer people starting businesses, particularly small businesses, and forcing students to drop out of school. It’s a problem for all of us. And the burdens of student debt are not distributed equally across all Americans: our country’s student debt crisis is hitting Black and Latinx communities especially hard. Half of Black borrowers and a third of Latinx borrowers default on their loans within 20 years. As president, I will direct my administration to begin the process of cancelling loans under its compromise and modification authorities on day one, according to the criteria set out in my existing plan and to amend any regulations or policy positions necessary to get there. And crucially, I’ll ensure that loan cancellation will not result in any additional tax liability for borrowers. In addition, the Higher Education Act provides a number of student loan cancellation programs that are not being used fully to give borrowers the relief they were promised under the law -- including discharges for borrowers whose college closed, for those who were defrauded by their school, and for those who engaged in public service. Hundreds of thousands of borrowers are already waiting to get the cancellations they were promised under these laws. I’ll ensure that borrowers get the relief they deserve by simplifying the application processes, doing affirmative outreach to borrowers to encourage them to apply, clearing out backlogged applications, using available data to match borrowers with their discharge options, automatically cancelling debts, discharging loans for groups instead of requiring individuals applications, and fixing any adverse effects of the debt on borrowers’ credit history. These programs will allow for 2 additional relief -- beyond the broad debt cancellation available to 42 million borrowers -- for as many as 1.75 million borrowers. Further, my administration will roll back harmful changes by the Trump administration to the rules that govern these programs and implement new rules to ensure that borrowers get the greatest opportunity to cancel their debts allowable under the law. And I have proposed eliminating the onerous “undue hardship” standard for discharging student debt in bankruptcy, but until Congress acts, I will direct my administration to stop standing in the way by opposing borrowers’ bankruptcy petitions, and to instead push for a less strict interpretation of undue hardship. I won’t stop fighting for Congress to enact the rest of my college affordability plan -- including the wealth tax on the richest people in the country that I have proposed to offset the cost. I won’t stop pushing until Congress has enacted universal tuition free public college, a $100 billion increase in Pell Grants to cover living expenses for low and middle-income students and an expansion of who is eligible for a Pell Grant, a minimum of $50 billion in increased funding for Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Serving Institutions, and a ban on federal funding for for-profit colleges. But we’re facing a student debt crisis, and every day counts for families struggling with this burden and for our economy as a whole. The steps I have outlined here will require clearing a lot of red tape to make sure borrowers get the relief to which they are entitled. I have consulted with leading experts on student debt cancellation who are confident that this plan is permissible under current law. But let’s be clear: our government has cleared far bigger hurdles to meet the needs of big businesses when they came looking for bailouts, tax giveaways, and other concessions. Instead of catering to the needs of the powerful and wealthy, a Warren administration will make the system work for the millions of Americans who worked hard to get an education, only to be trapped in debt. Addressing Racial Disparities and Predatory Practices in Our Higher Education System In addition to canceling existing student debt, we must take steps to improve college affordability and curb the growth of student loan debt in the future. I have already called for new laws making public college and technical school tuition-free, supporting HBCUs and Minority- Serving Institutions and working to close the racial gaps in access to higher education and college completion, and ending for-profit colleges’ access to federal student aid. I’ll urge Congress to adopt these proposals, but I will also use all the existing authorities at my disposal to fight racial disparities in higher education, encourage investments in public higher education that improve affordability and limit indebtedness, exclude predatory for-profit colleges from accessing federal aid, and crack down on predatory lending products. Addressing Racial Disparities in Higher Education through Civil Rights Law Our nation’s civil rights laws are clear: discrimination in the provision of student loans is illegal. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination in the provision of federal financial 3 assistance, and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits discrimination in the provision of credit products, including federal student loans. The Department of Education -- one of the federal agencies responsible for enforcing our nation’s civil rights laws -- is sitting on evidence of massive racial disparities in one of the country’s largest financial assistance programs, and it is not investigating the root causes of those disparities. Black students are 20% more likely to borrow, often borrow more, and default at more than twice the rate of white students. Whereas the median white borrower owes just $1,000 20 years after starting college, the median black borrower still owes $18,500 after two decades. There are persistent disparities for Latinx and Native American borrowers too. Experts have pointed to the racial wealth gap and racial discrimnation in the labor market as potential contributors to the disparities in student debt, but there has been little investigation into how the fundamentals of the provision of student loans -- from the way our higher education system is organized to the practices of student loan servicers and debt collectors -- contribute to the racialized outcomes of the student loan program.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics After World War I
    FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO WORKING PAPER SERIES Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics after World War I Jose A. Lopez Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Kris James Mitchener Santa Clara University CAGE, CEPR, CES-ifo & NBER June 2018 Working Paper 2018-06 https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/working-papers/2018/06/ Suggested citation: Lopez, Jose A., Kris James Mitchener. 2018. “Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics after World War I,” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2018-06. https://doi.org/10.24148/wp2018-06 The views in this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics after World War I Jose A. Lopez Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Kris James Mitchener Santa Clara University CAGE, CEPR, CES-ifo & NBER* May 9, 2018 ABSTRACT. Fiscal deficits, elevated debt-to-GDP ratios, and high inflation rates suggest hyperinflation could have potentially emerged in many European countries after World War I. We demonstrate that economic policy uncertainty was instrumental in pushing a subset of European countries into hyperinflation shortly after the end of the war. Germany, Austria, Poland, and Hungary (GAPH) suffered from frequent uncertainty shocks – and correspondingly high levels of uncertainty – caused by protracted political negotiations over reparations payments, the apportionment of the Austro-Hungarian debt, and border disputes. In contrast, other European countries exhibited lower levels of measured uncertainty between 1919 and 1925, allowing them more capacity with which to implement credible commitments to their fiscal and monetary policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Exploitation
    MAPPING EXPLOITATION Examining For-Profit Colleges as Financial Predators in Communities of Color July 2021 PROTECTBORROWERS.ORG MAPPING EXPLOITATION 2021 Table of Introduction 3 Contents Student Debt is a Crisis for Black and Latino Borrowers and Their Communities 5 For-Profit Colleges are Another Example of Firms Engaging in “Predatory Inclusion" 9 For-Profit Colleges and the Geography of Financial Predation 10 For-Profit Schools Target Communities of Color with Predatory Products That Produce Suboptimal Outcomes 13 Mapping For-Profits in the Midwest 14 Recommendations 26 Conclusion 31 Endnotes 32 2 MAPPING EXPLOITATION 2021 Introduction The country is in the midst of an unprecedented student debt crisis with 45 million borrowers collectively owing more than $1.7 trillion in student debt. Student loan borrowers have been sold the narrative that education is the key to social mobility—that it is “the great equalizer.”1 Meanwhile, the rising cost of higher education has brought with it rising levels of student debt—debt that is often excused or ignored as a personal shortcoming, the result of individual choices rather than a broad array of deep systemic failures.2 These parallel trends perpetuate the narrative that student loan borrowers are not entitled to assistance or that their distress does not merit policymakers’ attention. However, as we have seen time and time again, the vision of higher education as the key to individual opportunity and student debt as “good debt” has consistently failed to account for a host of interconnected
    [Show full text]
  • Is Theworld Undergoing Afiscal/Debt Revolution?
    A SYMPOSIUM OF VIEWS Is the World Undergoing A Fiscal/Debt Revolution? he need to go into debt to support the economy during the pandemic has a broad consensus of agreement. Even after adding 10–15 percent of GDP to debt levels, though, some economists are arguing that the world needs to keep expansionary fiscal policy for at least the next decade. In today’s era of ultra-low interest rates, they believe that monetary policy is pushing on Ta string. They further argue that so long as growth and interest rates are so low, fiscal stimulus is near riskless. The argument claims that it is more appropriate to compare debt stocks to the present value of future GDP or interest rate flows to GDP flows. This thinking implies, for example, that the reasoning that went into the formation of the Maastricht Treaty or various debt-reduction efforts in the United States is no lon- ger relevant for the advanced economies. Some advocates go so far as to argue that in light of dynamic scoring, borrowing to finance appropriate categories of Federal spend- ing “pays for itself” in budgetary terms based on “reasonable” assumptions. Therefore, some economies may be less constrained by fiscal limits even properly benchmarked be- cause fiscal expansions can raise GDP more than they raise debt and interest payments. Is the global economics profession truly undergoing such a revolution? Is it—like many revolutions—likely to end in tears, or something to be applauded? Or is it like China’s Premier Zhou Enlai said about the French Revolution, too soon to tell? The opinions of nearly two dozen noted experts.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding International Debt Crisis James R
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 19 | Issue 1 1987 Understanding International Debt Crisis James R. Barth Michael D. Bradley Paul C. Panayotacos Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation James R. Barth, Michael D. Bradley, and Paul C. Panayotacos, Understanding International Debt Crisis, 19 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 31 (1987) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol19/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Understanding International Debt Crisis by James R. Barth,* Michael D. Bradley** and Paul C. Panayotacos** INTRODUCTION I t is not unusual for borrowing and lending to take place across national borders. But when Mexico declared a moratorium on foreign debt pay- ments in August 1982 and subsequent debt servicing problems surfaced in countries such as Argentina, Brazil and Venezuela,' it became widely apparent that international debt is a mixed blessing.2 Although borrow- ing funds from abroad enables a country to obtain investment goods needed for economic growth, the inefficient use of those funds or exoge- nous shocks3 causing real interest rates to rise abruptly, oil prices to fluc- tuate widely, and commodity prices to fall sharply4 can severely limit a debtor country's ability or willingness to repay its borrowings.' Simi- * James R.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of the Euro Sovereign Debt Crisis on Global Trade and Economic Growth
    Impacts of the Euro sovereign debt crisis on global trade and economic growth: A General Equilibrium Analysis based on GTAP model Li Na1,2, Shi Minjun1,2, Huang Wen1,2 1. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 2. Research Center On Fictitious Economy & Data Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: Euro sovereign debt crisis will influence international trade and global economy through affecting factors supply, consumer and investment demand, and production efficiency in the PIIGS region. This paper aims to examine the impacts of Euro sovereign debt crisis on global import, export and global economic growth through trade channels by using the methods of general equilibrium analysis and scenario simulation based on GTAP model. As Euro sovereign debt crisis still continue, this research is carried out by two steps to examine its impacts on global economy: 1) the impacts of Euro sovereign debt crisis on global economy up to now (until the end of 2012); 2) the impacts of different trends of Euro sovereign debt crisis on global economy in future (2012-2015). The simulation results show that global economic growth has suffered a serious damage from 2010 to 2012. Affected by Euro sovereign debt crisis, the average annual growth rate of the global economy has reduced by 0.65% and global unemployment rate has risen by 1.81%. Global trade was in depression and the average annual trade growth was reduced by 1.14%. The import and export trade of the United States and China suffered more serious affected by the crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes and Lessons of the Mexican Peso Crisis
    Causes and Lessons of the Mexican Peso Crisis Stephany Griffith-Jones IDS, University of Sussex May 1997 This study has been prepared within the UNU/WIDER project on Short- Term Capital Movements and Balance of Payments Crises, which is co- directed by Dr Stephany Griffith-Jones, Fellow, IDS, University of Sussex; Dr Manuel F. Montes, Senior Research Fellow, UNU/WIDER; and Dr Anwar Nasution, Consultant, Center for Policy and Implementation Studies, Indonesia. UNU/WIDER gratefully acknowledges the financial contribution to the project by the Government of Sweden (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency - Sida). CONTENTS List of tables and charts iv Acknowledgements v Abstract vi I Introduction 1 II The apparently golden years, 1988 to early 1994 6 III February - December 1994: The clouds darken 15 IV The massive financial crisis explodes 24 V Conclusions and policy implications 31 Bibliography 35 iii LIST OF TABLES AND CHARTS Table 1 Composition (%) of Mexican and other countries' capital inflows, 1990-93 8 Table 2 Mexico: Summary capital accounts, 1988-94 10 Table 3 Mexico: Non-resident investments in Mexican government securities, 1991-95 21 Table 4 Mexico: Quarterly capital account, 1993 - first quarter 1995 (in millions of US dollars) 22 Table 5 Mexican stock exchange (BMV), 1989-1995 27 Chart 1 Mexico: Real effective exchange rate (1980=100) 7 Chart 2 Current account balance (% of GDP) 11 Chart 3 Saving-investment gap and current account 12 Chart 4 Stock of net international reserves in 1994 (in millions of US dollars) 17 Chart 5 Mexico: Central bank sterilised intervention 18 Chart 6 Mexican exchange rate changes within the exchange rate band (November 1991 through mid-December 1994) 19 Chart 7 Mexican international reserves and Tesobonos outstanding 20 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank UNU/WIDER for financial support for this research which also draws on work funded by SIDA and CEPAL.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes and Consequenses of the Recent Crises
    2 Causes and Consequences of the Recent Crises It is impossible to explain the evolution of the architecture exercise without first examining the emerging-market crises of the 1990s, especially the Mexican and Asian crises, with particular attention to the explanations given for them and the responses of the international community. Others have already reviewed those crises in detail;1 this chapter focuses on the features that set them apart from earlier currency crises and on the unusual nature of the official response. As both crises began when large capital inflows came to a sudden stop and gave way to large capital outflows, this chapter starts by asking why emerging-market countries started to experience large capital inflows in the early 1990s. It then examines the policy problems posed by those inflows—the macroeconomic problems that used to be the main focus of concern, and the microeconomic problems that help explain the vulnera- bility of the Asian countries and the virulence of the Asian crisis. The chapter then turns to the Mexican crisis to ask how it began, what might have been done to contain it, and why it was transformed from a currency crisis into a sovereign debt crisis. Although the Mexican crisis had some unusual features and the official response to the crisis was controversial, there was comparatively little debate about the causes of the crisis and no perceived need for a new set of currency-crisis models to explain the onset of the crisis.2 1. On Mexico, see IMF (1995), Edwards (1997), and Boughton (2000); on Asia, see IMF (1997b, 1998b, 1998c, 1998d), Bosworth (1998), and Eichengreen (1999a, appendix C).
    [Show full text]
  • THE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES of FINANCIAL REGIMES: a NEW LOOK at the BANKING POLICIES of MEXICO and BRAZIL, 1890-1910 América Latina En La Historia Económica
    América Latina en la Historia Económica. Revista de Investigación ISSN: 1405-2253 [email protected] Instituto de Investigaciones Dr. José María Luis Mora México Gerber, James; Passananti, Thomas THE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF FINANCIAL REGIMES: A NEW LOOK AT THE BANKING POLICIES OF MEXICO AND BRAZIL, 1890-1910 América Latina en la Historia Económica. Revista de Investigación, vol. 22, núm. 1, enero-abril, 2015, pp. 35-58 Instituto de Investigaciones Dr. José María Luis Mora Distrito Federal, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=279133751002 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative THE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF FINANCIAL REGIMES: A NEW LOOK AT THE BANKING POLICIES OF MEXICO AND BRAZIL, 1890-1910 CONSECUENCIAS ECONÓMICAS DE LOS REGÍMENES FINANCIEROS: UNA NUEVA PERSPECTIVA DE LAS POLÍTICAS BANCARIAS DE MÉXICO Y BRASIL, 1890-1910 James Gerber and Thomas Passananti San Diego State University, San Diego, Estados Unidos de América [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract. This paper compares the consequences of different financial policies adopted in Mexico and Brazil in the decades before World War I. In the 1890s, the national governments of Mexico and Brazil pursued strikingly different policies toward banking regulation. In Brazil, after the fall of the monarchy, authorities briefly experimented with financial liberalization. In Mexico, in the same era, public officials created a banking system with more constraints and regulations. We compare the costs and benefits to the financial systems and the macroeconomic effects of these different banking regimes, thereby revisiting two classic concerns of financial historians, the costs of financial fragility versus the benefits of financial liberalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia and the Global Financial Crisis: Conference Volume
    ASIA AND THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS Asia Economic Policy Conference Sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco ASIA AND THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS Edited by Reuven Glick Mark M. Spiegel Asia Economic Policy Conference Sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Santa Barbara, California October 19–20, 2009 The articles in this publication can be obtained in electronic form from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco’s website: http://www.frbsf.org/economics/conferences/aepc/2009/agenda.php Contents Foreword . 1 Janet L. Yellen, President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Conference Summary . 3 Reuven Glick, Group Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Mark M. Spiegel, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Welcome Address . 11 Asia and the Global Financial Crisis Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System General Discussion . 23 The Impact of the Financial Crisis on Emerging Asia . 27 Morris Goldstein, Dennis Weatherstone Senior Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics Daniel Xie, Research Assistant, Peterson Institute for International Economics commentary . 81 Michael Mussa, Senior Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics General Discussion . 85 Lessons from Asian Financial Experience . 93 Anne O. Krueger, Professor of International Economics, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University commentary . 115 Andrew Sheng, Chief Adviser, China Banking Regulatory Commission General Discussion . 123 Global Imbalances and the Financial Crisis: Products of Common Causes . 131 Maurice Obstfeld, Class of 1958 Professor of Economics, University of California, Berkeley Kenneth Rogoff, Professor of Economics and Thomas D. Cabot Professor of Public Policy, Harvard University commentary .
    [Show full text]
  • Debt and Financial Crises
    Policy Research Working Paper 9116 Public Disclosure Authorized Debt and Financial Crises Wee Chian Koh Public Disclosure Authorized M. Ayhan Kose Peter S. Nagle Franziska L. Ohnsorge Naotaka Sugawara Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Prospects Group January 2020 Policy Research Working Paper 9116 Abstract Emerging market and developing economies have experi- were associated with financial crises which typically had enced recurrent episodes of rapid debt accumulation over worse economic outcomes than those without crises—after the past fifty years. This paper examines the consequences 8 years output per capita was typically 6-10 percent lower of debt accumulation using a three-pronged approach: an and investment 15–22 percent weaker in crisis episodes. event study of debt accumulation episodes in 100 emerging Third, a rapid buildup of debt, whether public or private, market and developing economies since 1970; a series of increased the likelihood of a financial crisis, as did a larger econometric models examining the linkages between debt share of short-term external debt, higher debt service cover, and the probability of financial crises; and a set of case and lower reserves cover. Fourth, countries that experienced studies of rapid debt buildup that ended in crises. The financial crises frequently employed combinations of unsus- paper reports four main results. First, episodes of debt tainable fiscal, monetary and financial sector policies, and accumulation are common, with more than 500 episodes often suffered from structural and institutional weaknesses. occurring since 1970. Second, around half of these episodes This paper is a product of the Prospects Group. It is part of a larger effort by the World Bank to provide open access to its research and make a contribution to development policy discussions around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Over the Cliff: from the Subprime to the Global Financial Crisis
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES OVER THE CLIFF: FROM THE SUBPRIME TO THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS Frederic S. Mishkin Working Paper 16609 http://www.nber.org/papers/w16609 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 December 2010 The views expressed here are my own and are not necessarily those of Columbia University or the National Bureau of Economic Research. I thank participants in a seminar at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the editors of the Journal of Economic Perspectives for their helpful comments. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2010 by Frederic S. Mishkin. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Over The Cliff: From the Subprime to the Global Financial Crisis Frederic S. Mishkin NBER Working Paper No. 16609 December 2010 JEL No. E58,G01,G18 ABSTRACT This paper examines what transformed a significant, but relatively mild, financial disruption into a full-fledged financial crisis. It discusses why, although the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy was a key trigger for the global financial crisis, three other events were at least as important: the AIG collapse on September 16, 2008; the run on the Reserve Primary Fund on the same day; and the struggle to get the Troubled Asset Relief Plan (TARP) plan approved by Congress over the following couple of weeks. The paper then looks at the policy responses to the financial crisis to evaluate whether they helped avoid a worldwide depression.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflation and Debt
    Inflation and Debt John H. Cochrane or several years, a heated debate has raged among economists Fand policymakers about whether we face a serious risk of inflation. That debate has focused largely on the Federal Reserve — especially on whether the Fed has been too aggressive in increasing the money supply, whether it has kept interest rates too low, and whether it can be relied on to reverse course if signs of inflation emerge. But these questions miss a grave danger. As a result of the federal government’s enormous debt and deficits, substantial inflation could break out in America in the next few years. If people become convinced that our government will end up printing money to cover intractable deficits, they will see inflation in the future and so will try to get rid of dollars today — driving up the prices of goods, services, and eventually wages across the entire economy. This would amount to a “run” on the dollar. As with a bank run, we would not be able to tell ahead of time when such an event would occur. But our economy will be primed for it as long as our fiscal trajectory is unsustainable. Needless to say, such a run would unleash financial chaos and re- newed recession. It would yield stagflation, not the inflation-fueled boomlet that some economists hope for. And there would be essentially nothing the Federal Reserve could do to stop it. This concern, detailed below, is hardly conventional wisdom. Many economists and commentators do not think it makes sense to worry about inflation right now.
    [Show full text]