THE MACHINE QUESTION CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON AI, ROBOTS, AND 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK

David J Gunkel | 9780262534635 | | | | | The Machine Question Critical Perspectives on Ai, Robots, and Ethics 1st edition PDF Book The machine question poses a fundamental challenge to moral thinking, questioning the traditional philosophical conceptualization of technology as a tool or instrument to be used by human agents. Do Machines Have Rights? And this conclusion seems to be supported by the examples Channell provides, insofar as the AIDS virus is something that adversely affects the immune system and integrity of the human species. What limitations, if any, should guide autonomous decision making by artiicial intelligence systems, computers, or robots? That is, they redeine the center of moral consideration in order to describe progressively larger and more inclusive circles that are able to encompass a wider range of possible participants. Let us deine the class A of moral agents as the class of all entities that can in principle qualify as sources of moral action, and the class P of moral patients as the class of all entities that can in principle qualify as receivers of moral action. Despite all the ink that has been spilled on the animal ques- tion, little or nothing has been written about the machine. A thought-provoking look at the most interesting question in robot ethics: Can intelligent machines ever be considered as persons? In focusing attention on what is essentially the same in these various forms of moral centrism, the analysis does exactly what it charges—it identiies a common feature that underlies apparent diversity and effectively reduces a multiplicity of dif- ferences to what is the same. Derrida , 41—43 The third chapter engages in this kind of double gesture or double science. David Gunkel. Proposing an alternative, therefore, is neither simple, complete, nor beyond additional critical relection. International Philosophical Quarterly. When human individuals realize that they do not act alone but together with other people and things in extended agencies, they are more likely to appreciate the mutual dependency of all the participants for their common well-being. The Daily Telegraph. One of the two terms governs the other axiologically, logically, etc. David Gunkel goes on to make a significant contribution to any further discussion of the topic in a final section that deconstructs the machine question from the perspective of continental philosophers including Heidegger, Levinas, and Derrida. To deconstruct the opposition, irst of all, is to overturn the hierarchy at a given moment. Inclusion is a problem, because it emphasizes similarities at the expense of differences. Consequently, they include others by effectively stripping away and reducing differences. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Gunkel: The machine question: critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics". The Machine Question Critical Perspectives on Ai, Robots, and Ethics 1st edition Writer

As long as Socrates followed the tradition he had inherited from his predecessors—asking the questions they had already determined to be important, following the methods they had prescribed as being the most effective, and evaluating the kind of evidence they would recognize as appropriate—he failed. This effort is entirely consistent with what is called , but we should again be clear as to what this term denotes. As such, technology itself is neither good nor bad, it is just a more or less convenient or effective means to an end. The second chapter, titled Moral Patiency, focuses on the patient end of the topic and discusses the expansion of the field of animal studies and environmental studies. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval without permission in writing from the publisher. As long as moral debate and innovation remain involved with and structured by these two possibilities, little or nothing will change. The focus of the ethics of the vital machine must be decentered. Derrida , 41—43 The third chapter engages in this kind of double gesture or double science. In thinking otherwise, we will not be interested in taking sides or playing by the existing rules of the game. An investigation into the assignment of moral responsibilities and rights to intelligent and autonomous machines of our own making. Views Read Edit View history. Printed and bound in the United States of America. In this way, a frame also marginalizes others, leaving them on the exterior and beyond recognition. Need an account? Download as PDF Printable version. It begins by siding with the traditionally disadvantaged term over and against the one that has typically been privileged in the discourse of the status quo. Search Search. Consequently, they include others by effectively stripping away and reducing differences. Artiicial intelligence. Currently, we stand on the verge of another fundamental challenge to moral thinking. A Vindication of the Rights of Machines - v. Robotics—Moral and ethical aspects. Maybe some day the moral status of machines will be obvious for all of us, but for the present Gunkel's book provides an important voice for discussion on the moral status of machines. David J. Machines have been the definitive 'other,' not worthy of moral consideration, but as we contemplate the prospect that future machines might be conscious and perhaps even have feelings, we are forced to think deeply about who or what should be included in the moral order. The Daily Telegraph. The Machine Question Critical Perspectives on Ai, Robots, and Ethics 1st edition Reviews

Readers would do well to first read David Gunkel's The Machine Question in order to introduce themselves to the complex field of robot ethics. Despite all the ink that has been spilled on the animal ques- tion, little or nothing has been written about the machine. The practical employment of reason does not concern the animal, and, when Kant does make mention of ani- mality Tierheit , he does so only in order to use it as a foil by which to deine the limits of humanity proper. Before this new development in moral thinking advances too far, we should take the time to ask some fundamental philosophical questions. Ethics and Information Technology. As such, technology itself is neither good nor bad, it is just a more or less convenient or effective means to an end. This decentered, systems approach to deciding questions of moral con- siderability sounds promising, but it has problems. Skip to main content. This is, however, a limited and arguably nonphilosophical understand- ing of the role and function of philosophy, one that already assumes, among other things, that the objective of any and all inquiry is to supply answers to problems. Despite signiicantly challenging the anthropocentric perspective, this shift in focus is still and cannot help but be centrist. Even though there remain considerable disagree- ments about the exact qualities or criteria that should apply, what is not debated is the fact that an individual, in order to be considered a legitimate moral person, would need to achieve and demonstrate possession of the necessary and suficient conditions for inclusion in the club. As long as moral debate and innovation remain involved with and structured by these two possibilities, little or nothing will change. The task of philosophy is not to provide answers or solutions, but to submit to critical analysis the ques- tions themselves, to make us see how the very way we perceive a problem is an obstacle to its solution. There is, however, a more precise and nuanced deinition of the term that is rooted in the traditions and practices of critical philosophy. Gunkel's argument promises to influence future considerations of ethics, ourselves, and the other entities who inhabit this world. He nevertheless succeeded in connecting the ethics of robots and AI to a much broader ethical discussion than has been represented in the literature on to date. Consequently, the one is the inverse of the other. This, however, is not the case. Views Read Edit View history. But then the issue must be who or what gives Channell, presumably a human being, the right to speak on behalf of this larger community. In simply overturning the standard hierarchy and giving emphasis to the other term, this effort would remain within the conceptual ield deined and delimited by the agent—patient dialectic and would continue to play by its rules and according to its regulations. Gunkel that discusses the evolution of the theory of human ethical responsibilities toward non-human things and to what extent intelligent, autonomous machines can be considered to have legitimate moral responsibilities and what legitimate claims to moral consideration they can hold. Strictly speaking, however, criticism involves more. It is delightful mainly because such diversity of approach, content, and examples is too rarely found in an academic publication What moral responsibilities would these machines have to us, and what responsibilities might we have to such ethically minded machines? He was, in fact, interested in both sides of the animal-machine. That is, it commences by asking whether and to what extent machines of various designs and functions might be consid- ered a legitimate moral agent that could be held responsible and account- able for decisions and actions. Clearly, this mode of inquiry already represents a major shift in thinking about technology and the technologi- cal artifact. Essays in Philosophy This book is essential reading for philosophers interested in AI, robot ethics, or animal ethics. Chapter 3 Thinking Otherwise. Books portal Philosophy portal technology portal. Gunkel: The machine question: critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics". Stansbury explained that the book is able to use simple examples to discuss difficult topics and separate ideas and that it would be "useful for philosophy students, and for engineering students interested in exploring the ethical implications of their work". When Kant , for instance, deined morality as involving the rational determination of the will, the animal, which does not by deinition possess reason, is imme- diately and categorically excluded. Conceptualized in this fashion, the animal and machine were effectively indistinguishable and ontologically the same. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. And what would it mean to articulate and practice an ethics of this subject? Share Share Share email. For Hanson, this distributed moves away from the anthropocentric individualism of enlightenment thought, which divides the world into self and other, and introduces an ethics that is more in line with recent innovations in eco- logical thinking: When the subject is perceived more as a verb than a noun—a way of combining different entities in different ways to engage in various activities—the distinction between Self and Other loses both clarity and signiicance. And it is for this reason that little or nothing actually changes as moral theory and practices have developed and matured over time.

The Machine Question Critical Perspectives on Ai, Robots, and Ethics 1st edition Read Online

Robotics— Philosophy. Because of this, we should be clear as to what deconstruction entails and how it will be deployed in the context of the machine question. Log In Sign Up. Machines have been the definitive 'other,' not worthy of moral consideration, but as we contemplate the prospect that future machines might be conscious and perhaps even have feelings, we are forced to think deeply about who or what should be included in the moral order. At the same time, however, these decisions have had devastating consequences for others. In addition, the issue of the other minds problem entails that no proper understanding of consciousness can come to pass due to the inability to properly understand the mind of a being that is not oneself. I would look at how every- one else was tackling a certain problem and ind the core central thing that they had all agreed on so much that they never even talked about it. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. In fact, this alternative approach seems to make patiency the privileged term rather than a derived aspect of some predeined notion of moral agency. Printed and bound in the United States of America. But inclusion, as its mere lip side and dialectical other, appears to be no less problematic. It is and remains a mere revolutionary gesture. When human individuals realize that they do not act alone but together with other people and things in extended agencies, they are more likely to appreciate the mutual dependency of all the participants for their common well-being. Maybe some day the moral status of machines will be obvious for all of us, but for the present Gunkel's book provides an important voice for discussion on the moral status of machines. Gunkel engages the thinking of both 'analytic' and 'continental' philosophers, which I believe is a virtue One of the enduring concerns of moral philosophy is deciding who or what is deserving of ethical consideration. It will have been a kind of primordial patiency, or what could be called, following a Derridian practice, an arche-patient that is and remains in excess of the agent—patient conceptual opposition. Even when membership in the club of consideranda has, slowly and not without considerable resis- tance and struggle, been extended to some of these previously excluded others, there have remained other, apparently more fundamental and necessary exclusions. Following this procedure, we can say that one of the common and often unacknowledged features of the different formulations of both moral agency and patiency is the assumption that moral considerability is some- thing that can and should be decided on the basis of individual qualities. Machines and the face of ethics. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.

https://files8.webydo.com/9583569/UploadedFiles/2C440E45-3631-E23E-B20D-CE49480CB211.pdf https://cdn.starwebserver.se/shops/aaronhermanssoniv/files/augmented-landscapes-smout-allen-442.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583136/UploadedFiles/EAC96D22-58CD-7001-8409-3495CC88E124.pdf https://cdn.starwebserver.se/shops/amerivarssonaf/files/the-knot-ultimate-wedding-planner-organizer-binder-edition-worksheets-checklists- etique.pdf https://cdn.starwebserver.se/shops/robertperssonvj/files/on-looking-eleven-walks-with-expert-eyes-564.pdf