OUTPOSTS and Price TAG VIOLENCE a Blow Upon a Bruise September 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OUTPOSTS and Price TAG VIOLENCE a Blow Upon a Bruise September 2012 OUTPOSTS AND PRICE TAG VIOLENCE A BLOW UPON A BRUISE SEPTEMBER 2012 THE UNESCO CHAIR ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY AT an-naJAH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Co-published BY THE ALTERNATIVE INFORMATION CENTER 1 2 OUTPOSTS AND ‘PRICE TAG’ VIOLENCE A Blow Upon a Bruise September 2012 3 The UNESCO Chair on Human Rights & Democracy at An-Najah University www.najah.edu/centers/uchrd Alternative Information Center (AIC) www.alternativenews.org Published by: UNESCO Chair/AIC. Copyright © 2012. All rights reserved. Researcher: Philip Bato Editorial team: Alice Arnold, Paul Edleman Abed Qusini and ActiveStills.org contributed the following photographs: Cover, p. 29,33,34,37,38,42,45 - Abed Qusini p.15,21,27 - Keren Manor/Activestills.org p.11,14 - Oren Ziv/Activestills.org 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would love to extend a special thanks to all that were involved in the realization of this report. The UNESCO Chair would especially like to thank Yesh Din, Peace Now, EAPPI, Tom Palmer, Al-Haq, Abed Qusini, and ActiveStills for their valuable contributions and advice. Moreover, we are grateful for the time and effort spent by all village councils, mayors and village residents who aided us in our research. We also want to thank the UNESCO Chair legal interns and staff for their contributions, especially Ruba Khuffash, Sana Ibrahim and Behnoud Irantalab. Last of all, we appreciate the information, statistics and feedback we received from all committed individuals and organizations involved in human rights advocacy in the West Bank. 5 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 8 SECTION I. The Settlements, Outposts and International Law 10 1. Israeli Settlements and Outposts under International Law 11 1.1. Legal Framework: Land Acquisition and Civilian Transfer under International Law 12 1.2. Licensed Colonization: The High Court and Israeli Settlement Expansion since 1967 13 2. The Outposts: A New Settlement Frontier 15 2.1. Outposts and the Israeli State: Continuing the settlement enterprise post-1995 16 2.2. Israeli government support for outpost construction and expansion 18 2.3. Establish an Outpost 101 19 2.4. Outpost Demolition Orders: Institutionalized Lawlessness 19 2.5. From Demolition Order to New Settlement: The Outpost Showdown 21 2.6. Conclusion 26 SECTION II. Price Tag Violence and International Law 28 3. The Anatomy of ‘Price Tag’ Violence 29 3.1. Racism, Violence and Religion: The Radical History of ‘Price Tag’ Violence 30 3.2. Defining ‘Price Tag’ Violence 31 3.3. Result: Less Outpost Demolitions, More Settlements 38 Case Study: The Mitzpe Yitzhar and Ramat Gilad Demolitions 40 Case Study: Migron 40 4. ‘Price Tag’ Violence and the International Legal Duty of Law Enforcement 42 4.1. Occupying powers are bound by international law to protect the 42 population of the occupied territories from attack and investigate, prevent and punish any offenses that occur. 4.2. ‘Price Tag’ attacks constitute violations to Palestinian rights 43 4.3. Israel has failed in its legal duties under IHL and IHRL to prevent, investigate and 43 prosecute ‘price tag’ attacks against Palestinians. 4.4. State Responsibility 47 Conclusion 48 Appendix A: The ‘Price Tag’ Incident Database (June 2008 - July 2012) 66 Appendix B: Overview ‘Price Tag’ Attacks 2008-2012 68 Appendix C: Map of ‘Price Tag’ Attacks in the Northern West Bank 79 7 INTRODUCTION A new era has come to Judea and Samaria. For every evacuation, for every demolition and destruction, for every stone moved, [the Israeli government] will get war. We call this ‘mutual responsibility,’[...] For every act of destruction in the southern Hebron hills we will set fire to Samaria, and for a container destroyed near Har Bracha we will exact a price in the southern Hebron hills. 1 - Israeli settler on ‘price tag’ violence This report takes two concepts related to the Israeli occupation – “unauthorized outposts” and “price tag violence”– and places them within the larger framework of Israeli settler violence and the settlements, while defining their relation to the Israeli government. It clarifies why current outpost-related events, including ‘price tag’ violence, should be seen as both the logical continuation of the Israeli settlement enterprise and an important weathervane of current Israeli policy in the occupied Palestinian territory. To clarify the dynamic between the two inherently interwoven concepts of outposts and ‘price tag’ violence, this report attempts to place both phenomena in their respective historical contexts and examines the shared power structures and underlying forces that continue to shape them. Outposts are embryonic settlements that are illegal under international and Israeli law. Since the Oslo Accords in 1993, outposts have served an essential tool of Israeli acquisition of Palestinian land and thrived in the culture of impunity surrounding Israeli settler activities in the West Bank. Because outposts are officially “unauthorized” and hence illegal under Israeli law, the Israeli government is able to claim it has no ties to their construction. The reality, however, is that in violation of their own and international law, Israeli government authorities have covertly funneled public funds to settlers for the construction of outposts, sometimes even cooperated in planning the outposts, and generally failed to demolish or punish illegal settler construction. While the Israeli Civilian Administration does issue demolition orders against settler structures in the outposts, Israeli Ministers of Defense have continuously refused to execute these orders, effectively allowing outposts to entrench their hold on stolen land. The Israeli government knows to what extent its Ministries and officials are involved in the establishment and expansion of outposts, it even commis- sioned and adopted a well-known report on the matter in 2005. Nonetheless, nothing has been done and the number of outposts has increased. Over the last decade, Palestinian landowners and Israeli NGOs have petitioned the Israeli High Court to challenge the chain of illegal government-settler behavior that surrounds the outposts. By 2005, the petitions and other political pressures succesfully forced the Israeli government to implement several pending demoli- tion orders against outposts. Radical settlers, disillusioned by the 2005 Gaza Disengagement, saw the demolition of outposts as a continuation of the Disengagement and an existentialist threat to the settlement enterprise. To halt this perceived government menace, the settlers responded to the demolitions with ‘price tag’, a violent strategy of deterrence. First used in 2008, the ‘price tag’ strategy aims to deter Israeli government actions against all outposts and other settler interests through coordinated settler attacks against Palestinians villages and any Israeli organization that is perceived as work against the settlement enterprise. The attacks happen especially when outpost structures have been demolished or are under threat of demolition; the message being that the government will receive a “price tag” for every action it takes against the settlers. The principal idea is that provocative settler attacks on Palestinian civilian and reli- gious targets might trigger possible Palestinian counter-attacks and threaten the current status quo in the West Bank, which could destabilize the Israeli government. Subsequent government fears of further ‘price tag’ attacks, the logic goes, will coerce the Israeli government into changing its policies concerning the settlements enterprise in favor of the settlers’ political goals. Israeli NGO ‘Peace Now’ described the strategy as “a major success and a rather unique form of terrorism in Western experience: Politically-motivated violence, directed against innocent civilian members of an adversarial society (Palestinians), with a primary purpose of deterring the terrorists’ own government (Israel’s) from taking actions against their community.” The Israeli government has generally failed to crack down on ‘price tag’ criminals, which has enhanced the climate of impunity in which settlers thrive. It is true that ‘price tag’ attacks are physically no different from the other forms of settler violence that Palestinian communities endure on a daily basis—e.g. arson, beatings, shootings and property theft—and that ‘price tag’ attacks make up only a small percentage of the overall settler violence that occurs in the occupied Palestinian territories. The particular relevance of the ‘price tag’ phenomenon, however, lies in its strategic use of violence to commu- nicate the power settlers wield to destabilize the already fragile security situation in the West Bank in order to shift Israeli government policy towards settler demands. Although small in scope, ‘price tag’ violence signifies new trends 8 amongst Israel’s most radical settlement communities concerning their relationship with the State of Israel and the wide-spread acceptance of violence as a legitimate form of resistance by a new settler generation. Moreover, due to the Israeli government’s placement of radical ideological settlers communities into the oPt, its expansionism through use of outposts, and the different legal standards it employs for Israelis and Palestinians, ‘price tag’ attacks must be understood as the undeniable product of Israeli government policy instead of ‘fringe’ acts of violence. Both outpost demolitions and ‘price tag’ attacks have increasingly made media headlines over the last year and the rise of settler attacks has sparked renewed concerns about the violence and
Recommended publications
  • Israeli Settlement in the Occupied Territories
    REPORT ON ISRAELI SETTLEMENT IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES A Bimonthly Publication of the Foundation for Middle East Peac e Volum e 20 N umber 2 March-April 2010 THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TALKS TOUGH By Geoffrey Aronson “proximity talks,” thus formalizing the issues” in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, U.S. effort as it has evolved during the including the status of Jerusalem, be When then Secretary of State Con- first year of Obama’s presidency. included in upcoming talks. doleezza Rice was set to visit Israel The fragility of this understanding The loss of confidence between the almost two years ago, Prime Minister was exposed by Israel’s decision to two capitals fueled by the Netanyahu’s Ehud Olmert decided to postpone the advance the planning of 1,600 units for settlement program has been highlight - festive opening of the new border police approximately 10,000 new residents, in ed by an unprecedented statement by station in E-1 east of Jerusalem in order the East Jerusalem settlement of Ramat CENTCOM commander Gen. David not to embarrass the U.S. envoy, who, Shlomo, a fast growing ultra-orthodox Petraeus, suggesting that the diplomatic like her predecessors, had been prom - neighborhood of close to 18,000. PLO impasse threatens the safety of U.S. ised that a decision to settle E-1 would chairman Mahmoud Abbas suspended forces in the region and impacts nega - not be realized for years. Palestinian participation in the yet to tively on Washington’s ability to meet Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu begin talks and Biden “condemned” regional challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU Must Change Vocabulary on Israel-Palestine
    The EU Must Change Vocabulary on Israel-Palestine © 2021 IAI by Michelle Pace As hundreds of Palestinians began Gazans as human beings – in spite of cleaning the debris left behind by Israel’s the “hell on earth”3 that Israel’s settler- ISSN 2532-6570 latest 11-day assault on the Gaza Strip – colonial violence has imposed upon which caused at least 256 Palestinian them.4 deaths, including 66 children, and a further 13 deaths within Israel1 –, a The campaign’s quest to humanise degree of humanity was restored to the everyday suffering of 2 million Gaza’s besieged population. inhabitants of Gaza stands in sharp contrast to Israel’s representation of the The Gaza City municipality – which Gaza Strip as a hotbed of terrorists: the initiated the volunteering campaign campaign overrides such depictions – named it Han’amarha (“we will build with the spirit of hope, love, solidarity it”).2 A strong statement that contributes and community. to undermine the “us” versus “them” binary, providing a window into the What happened across occupied individual and collective struggle of Palestinian territory (oPt) during May 2021 serves as a reminder that we are 1 The Norwegian Refugee Council confirmed again witnessing Israel’s sustained that 11 of the over 60 children killed by Israeli air strikes in Gaza were participating in its psycho- social programme aimed at helping them deal 3 UN Secretary General, António Guterres, with trauma. See, Norwegian Refugee Council, described the lives of children in Gaza as “hell Eleven Children Receiving NRC Trauma Care on earth” on 20 May 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yitzhar – a Case Study Settler Violence As a Vehicle for Taking Over Palestinian Land with State and Military Backing
    Yitzhar – A Case Study Settler violence as a vehicle for taking over Palestinian land with state and military backing August 2018 Yitzhar – A Case Study Settler violence as a vehicle for taking over Palestinian land with state and military backing Position paper, August 2018 Research and writing: Yonatan Kanonich Editing: Ziv Stahl Additional Editing: Lior Amihai, Miryam Wijler Legal advice: Atty. Michael Sfard, Atty. Ishai Shneidor Graphic design: Yuda Dery Studio English translation: Maya Johnston English editing: Shani Ganiel Yesh Din Public council: Adv. Abeer Baker, Hanna Barag, Dan Bavly, Prof. Naomi Chazan, Ruth Cheshin, Akiva Eldar, Prof. Rachel Elior, Dani Karavan, Adv. Yehudit Karp, Paul Kedar, Dr. Roy Peled, Prof. Uzy Smilansky, Joshua Sobol, Prof. Zeev Sternhell, Yair Rotlevy. Yesh Din Volunteers: Rachel Afek, Dahlia Amit, Maya Bailey, Hanna Barag, Michal Barak, Atty. Dr. Assnat Bartor, Osnat Ben-Shachar, Rochale Chayut, Beli Deutch, Dr. Yehudit Elkana, Rony Gilboa, Hana Gottlieb, Tami Gross, Chen Haklai, Dina Hecht, Niva Inbar, Daniel A. Kahn, Edna Kaldor, Nurit Karlin, Ruth Kedar, Lilach Klein Dolev, Dr. Joel Klemes, Bentzi Laor, Yoram Lehmann RIP, Judy Lots, Aryeh Magal, Sarah Marliss, Shmuel Nachmully RIP, Amir Pansky, Talia Pecker Berio, Nava Polak, Dr. Nura Resh, Yael Rokni, Maya Rothschild, Eddie Saar, Idit Schlesinger, Ilana Meki Shapira, Dr. Tzvia Shapira, Dr. Hadas Shintel, Ayala Sussmann, Sara Toledano. Yesh Din Staff: Firas Alami, Lior Amihai, Yudit Avidor, Maysoon Badawi, Hagai Benziman, Atty. Sophia Brodsky, Mourad Jadallah, Moneer Kadus, Yonatan Kanonich, Atty. Michal Pasovsky, Atty. Michael Sfard, Atty. Muhammed Shuqier, Ziv Stahl, Alex Vinokorov, Sharona Weiss, Miryam Wijler, Atty. Shlomy Zachary, Atty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Base of Israel's Colonial Settlements in the West Bank
    Palestine Economic Policy Research Institute The Economic Base of Israel’s Colonial Settlements in the West Bank Nu’man Kanafani Ziad Ghaith 2012 The Palestine Economic Policy Research Institute (MAS) Founded in Jerusalem in 1994 as an independent, non-profit institution to contribute to the policy-making process by conducting economic and social policy research. MAS is governed by a Board of Trustees consisting of prominent academics, businessmen and distinguished personalities from Palestine and the Arab Countries. Mission MAS is dedicated to producing sound and innovative policy research, relevant to economic and social development in Palestine, with the aim of assisting policy-makers and fostering public participation in the formulation of economic and social policies. Strategic Objectives Promoting knowledge-based policy formulation by conducting economic and social policy research in accordance with the expressed priorities and needs of decision-makers. Evaluating economic and social policies and their impact at different levels for correction and review of existing policies. Providing a forum for free, open and democratic public debate among all stakeholders on the socio-economic policy-making process. Disseminating up-to-date socio-economic information and research results. Providing technical support and expert advice to PNA bodies, the private sector, and NGOs to enhance their engagement and participation in policy formulation. Strengthening economic and social policy research capabilities and resources in Palestine. Board of Trustees Ghania Malhees (Chairman), Ghassan Khatib (Treasurer), Luay Shabaneh (Secretary), Mohammad Mustafa, Nabeel Kassis, Radwan Shaban, Raja Khalidi, Rami Hamdallah, Sabri Saidam, Samir Huleileh, Samir Abdullah (Director General). Copyright © 2012 Palestine Economic Policy Research Institute (MAS) P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2014 Al-Malih Shaqed Kh
    Salem Zabubah Ram-Onn Rummanah The West Bank Ta'nak Ga-Taybah Um al-Fahm Jalameh / Mqeibleh G Silat 'Arabunah Settlements and the Separation Barrier al-Harithiya al-Jalameh 'Anin a-Sa'aidah Bet She'an 'Arrana G 66 Deir Ghazala Faqqu'a Kh. Suruj 6 kh. Abu 'Anqar G Um a-Rihan al-Yamun ! Dahiyat Sabah Hinnanit al-Kheir Kh. 'Abdallah Dhaher Shahak I.Z Kfar Dan Mashru' Beit Qad Barghasha al-Yunis G November 2014 al-Malih Shaqed Kh. a-Sheikh al-'Araqah Barta'ah Sa'eed Tura / Dhaher al-Jamilat Um Qabub Turah al-Malih Beit Qad a-Sharqiyah Rehan al-Gharbiyah al-Hashimiyah Turah Arab al-Hamdun Kh. al-Muntar a-Sharqiyah Jenin a-Sharqiyah Nazlat a-Tarem Jalbun Kh. al-Muntar Kh. Mas'ud a-Sheikh Jenin R.C. A'ba al-Gharbiyah Um Dar Zeid Kafr Qud 'Wadi a-Dabi Deir Abu Da'if al-Khuljan Birqin Lebanon Dhaher G G Zabdah לבנון al-'Abed Zabdah/ QeiqisU Ya'bad G Akkabah Barta'ah/ Arab a-Suweitat The Rihan Kufeirit רמת Golan n 60 הגולן Heights Hadera Qaffin Kh. Sab'ein Um a-Tut n Imreihah Ya'bad/ a-Shuhada a a G e Mevo Dotan (Ganzour) n Maoz Zvi ! Jalqamus a Baka al-Gharbiyah r Hermesh Bir al-Basha al-Mutilla r e Mevo Dotan al-Mughayir e t GNazlat 'Isa Tannin i a-Nazlah G d Baqah al-Hafira e The a-Sharqiya Baka al-Gharbiyah/ a-Sharqiyah M n a-Nazlah Araba Nazlat ‘Isa Nazlat Qabatiya הגדה Westהמערבית e al-Wusta Kh.
    [Show full text]
  • 78% of Construction Was in “Isolated Settlements”*
    Peace Now’s Annual Settlement Construction Report for 2017 Construction Starts in Settlements were 17% Above Average in 2017 78% of Construction was in “Isolated Settlements”* Settlement Watch, Peace Now Key findings – Construction in the West Bank, 2017 (East Jerusalem excluded) 1 According to Peace Now's count, 2,783 new housing units began construction in 2017, around 17% higher than the yearly average rate since 2009.2 78% (2,168 housing units) of the new construction was in settlements east of the proposed Geneva Initiative border, i.e. settlements that are likely to be evicted in a two-state agreement. 36% (997 housing units) of the new construction was in areas that are east of the route of the separation barrier. Another 46% (1,290 units) was between the built and the planned route of the fence. Only 18% was west of the built fence. At least 10% (282 housing units) of the construction was illegal according to the Israeli laws applied in the Occupied Territories (regardless of the illegality of all settlements according to the international law). Out of those, 234 units (8% of the total construction) were in illegal outposts. The vast majority of the new construction, 91% (2,544 housing units), was for permanent structures, while that the remainder 9% were new housing units in the shape of mobile homes both in outposts and in settlements. 68 new public buildings (such as schools, synagogues etc.) started to be built, alongside 69 structures for industry or agriculture. Advancement of Plans and Tenders (January-December 2017) 6,742 housing units were advanced through promotions of plans for settlements, in 59 different settlements (compared to 2,657 units in 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Settlement in the Occupied Territories
    REPORT ON ISRAELI SETTLEMENT IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES A Bimonthly Publication of the Foundation for Middle East Peac e Volum e 19 N umber 3 May-June 2009 SETTLEMENT FREEZE REDUX* By Geoffrey Aronson settlements, the idea still has merit. “If there is procrastination by Israel But achieving the goal of peace and Israel’s ever-expanding network on the two-state solution or there is no security for both Israelis and Pale- of civilian settlements in the occu - stinians requires a strategy rooted pied territories is viewed by its par - clear American vision for how this is in historical experience and the tisans and opponents alike as the going to play out in 2009, then all the vital requirements of both peoples. most significant obstacle to the tremendous credibility that Obama has A settlement freeze falls short of creation of a viable, sovereign Pale- worldwide and in this region will evap - this standard. Settlement evacua - stinian state. Palestinian Authority orate overnight if nothing comes out in tion, not a freeze, is a more credi - chairman Mahmoud Abbas is con - May.” ble and necessary objective, more ditioning a renewal of discussions closely attuned to the essential King Abdullah of Jordan, with Israel on an Israeli commit - long-term interests of both parties The Times , May 11, 2009 ment to freeze all settlement, echo - and firmly rooted in past Israeli ing a demand originally made in practice, most recently in Gaza. 1992 during the pre-Oslo Wash- Placing a freeze at the center of a ington talks. U.S. diplomacy. More often than not, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Olive Agony 2018 ( a Statistical Report on Israeli Violations)
    Palestinian Olive Agony 2018 ( A Statistical Report on Israeli Violations) Prepared by: Monitoring Israeli Violations Team Land Research Center Arab Studies Society - Jerusalem March 2019 ARAB STUDIES SOCIETY – Land Research Center (LRC) – Jerusalem 1 Halhul – Main Road, Tel: 02-2217239 , Fax: 02 -2290918 , P.O.Box: 35, E-mail: [email protected], URL: www.lrcj.org The olive tree have always been a thorn on the Israeli occupation’s side Deep rooted in the history of this land.. its oil is still sacred enlightening its temples Its branches play with farmers’ children.. and suffer from agonizing pain when touched by a settler’s saw That is, the Palestinian olive tree.. standing still on the face of the Israeli occupation’s sadism Burnt.. but reborn from its dust like a phoenix Cut.. but grows anew from its roots Stolen.. and when planted in their settlements. .becomes darkened and cloudy The Israeli occupiers tried to contain the olive tree , but it refused.. so they decided to uproot it from the land of Palestine , but failed and will fail The olive trees are a constant tar get by the occupation but they are still steadfast and refuses to surrender .. The olive tree stands for Palestinians' very existence, and their cultural identity and civilization, it is a testimony from history on the Palestinian land’s Arabism. Jamal Talab Al -Amleh LRC general manager Jerusalem – Palestine ARAB STUDIES SOCIETY – Land Research Center (LRC) – Jerusalem 2 Halhul – Main Road, Tel: 02-2217239 , Fax: 02-2290918 , P.O.Box: 35, E-mail: [email protected], URL: www.lrcj.org In 201 8, Land Research Center documented attacks that targeted olive trees, though daily monitoring: • 117 attacks took place , 90 of them were perpet rated by settlers from settlements nearby olive groves, while 27 were perpetrated by the occupation forces.
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/40/42 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/40/42 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 January 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Fortieth session 25 February–22 March 2019 Agenda items 2 and 7 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan* Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Summary In the present report, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights describes the expansion of the settlement enterprise of Israel and its negative impact on the human rights of Palestinians. The focus of the report is on the effects of settler violence on Palestinians’ access to land and freedom of movement. It also addresses issues relating to Israeli settlements in the occupied Syrian Golan. The report covers the period from 1 November 2017 to 31 October 2018. * The present report was submitted after the deadline in order to reflect the most recent information. GE.19-01426(E) A/HRC/40/42 I. Introduction 1. The present report, submitted to the Human Rights Council pursuant to its resolution 37/36, provides an update on the implementation of that resolution from 1 November 2017 to 31 October 2018. It is based on monitoring and other information-gathering activities conducted by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and on information provided by other United Nations entities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and civil society in the occupied Syrian Golan.
    [Show full text]
  • B'tselem 2005 Annual Report
    בצלם - מרכז המידע הישראלי לזכויות האדם בשטחים (ע.ר.) ﺒﺘﺴﻴﻠﻡ - ﻤﺭﻜﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺴﺭﺍﺌﻴﻠﻲ ﻟﺤﻘﻭﻕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺭﺍﻀﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺘﻠﻪ B’Tselem – The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories B’Tselem 2005 Activity Report Introduction _______________________________________________________________ 1 Summary of Activities and Highlights___________________________________________ 1 Topics Addressed ___________________________________________________________ 3 Gaza Before and After Disengagement_____________________________________________ 3 Settler Violence ________________________________________________________________ 4 Separation Barrierand Settlement Expansion _______________________________________ 5 Military Accountability _________________________________________________________ 7 Lethal Force during Arrests_____________________________________________________________ 7 Lethal Force and Lack of Military Investigations ____________________________________________ 8 Jerusalem_____________________________________________________________________ 9 Southern Hebron Hills _________________________________________________________ 10 House Demolitions ____________________________________________________________ 10 Death Penalty in the Palestinian Authority ________________________________________ 11 Additional Research Topics ____________________________________________________ 12 Resource and Information Center_____________________________________________ 12 Advocacy and Public Relations _______________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Playing the Security Card: Israeli Policy in Hebron As Means To
    Playing the Security Card Israeli Policy in Hebron as a Means to Effect Forcible Transfer of Local Palestinians -1- Playing the Security Card Israeli Policy in Hebron as a Means to Effect Forcible Transfer of Local Palestinians September 2019 Research: Adam Aloni, Eyal Hareuveni Writing: Eyal Hareuveni Fieldwork: Musa Abu Hashhash, Manal al–Ja’bri Data coordination: Marwa Ghannam Map: Asaf Volanski Translation: Michelle Bubis Editing: Maya Johnston Cover photo: Shoter Checkpoint, Eyal Hareuveni, 1 May 2019 Einhar Design ISBN 978-965-7613-37-5 B'Tselem thanks Nadav Weiman, Ron Zaidel and Yehuda Shaul of Breaking the Silence, Hagit Ofran of Peace Now, Att. Roni Pelli of ACRI and Yonatan Mizrahi of Emek Shaveh for their help in preparing the report. This publication was produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of B’Tselem and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. In compliance with the law passed by the Israeli Knesset that seeks to equate the receipt of foreign funding with disloyalty, please note that 52% of B’Tselem’s funding in 2018 was received from foreign state entities. They are listed on the website of the Israeli Registrar of Associations (and elsewhere). In any case, B’Tselem remains steadfastly loyal – to human rights, freedom, democracy, and to an end to the occupation. Table of Contents Introduction 5 Chapter 1: Israeli settlement in Hebron and plans to expand it 8 Chapter 2: The separation regime in Area H2 13 Chapter 3: Routine of violence 19 Chapter 4: Forcible transfer of Palestinians from H2 22 Chapter 5: Daily life – testimonies of past and present residents of H2 25 Conclusions 32 Introduction The Israeli settlement in Hebron was established once the cultural and commercial hub of the entire in the heart of a bustling city that used to be the southern West Bank, are now a ghost town.
    [Show full text]