DOCSLIB.ORG

Durham E-Theses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Durham E-Theses Genesis 1 and Creation Ex Nihilo: A Reconsideration CHAMBERS, NATHAN How to cite: CHAMBERS, NATHAN (2017) Genesis 1 and Creation Ex Nihilo: A Reconsideration, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12443/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk ABSTRACT Genesis 1 and Creation Ex Nihilo: A Reconsideration Nathan J. Chambers This thesis addresses the question of the relationship between Genesis 1 and the doctrine of creation ex nihilo. Although creation ex nihilo was developed in the early church as a guide for reading Genesis 1, the consensus among modern historically-oriented biblical scholarship is that, as a post-biblical category, creation ex nihilo in fact obscures the original meaning of Genesis 1. By examining the various historical and theological contexts within which Genesis 1 has been read, I illustrate the differing purposes with which one can read the biblical text and the differing methods of study which relate to these purposes. Although one can read Genesis 1 as ancient history, it can also be read as part of the canonical Scripture of the church. I first examine the ancient Near Eastern background of Genesis, which forms the historical context within which Genesis 1 has been read in the modern period. Then I turn to an exposition of the doctrine of creation ex nihilo in its classic iteration within the Christian tradition. This leads naturally to an examination of the historical circumstances in which the early church developed this doctrine. Having examined some of the key historical and theological contexts within which Genesis 1 has been read, and having addressed various hermeneutical issues involved in negotiating these various contexts, I focus on the text of Genesis 1:1-3. The syntax of these verses has been a major interpretive crux in the modern period and so I offer a close philological examination of the various possible interpretations. I conclude by examining the narrative function of Genesis 1:1 within the chapter as a whole and its larger literary-canonical context, arguing that the verse can responsibly and plausibly be read as describing the first act in the process of creation. GENESIS 1 AND CREATION EX NIHILO: A Reconsideration Nathan J. Chambers Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Durham University Department of Theology and Religion 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION: RECONSIDERING GENESIS 1 AND CREATION EX NIHILO 1 1. The Questions 1 2. A Brief Overview 3 3. A Note on Sources 5 CHAPTER 2: INTERPRETIVE CATEGORIES AND THE ANCIENT NEAR EASTERN CONTEXT 6 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Comparative Studies and Creation Ex Nihilo 6 1.2 Methodological Issues in Comparative Studies 10 1.3 Comparative Reading of Genesis 1 12 1.4 ‘Myth’ 15 2. Canaanite Material 16 2.1 Summary 16 2.2 Key Text? 18 3. Egyptian Material 19 3.1 Summary 19 3.2 Key Text: The Memphite Theology 26 4. Mesopotamian Material 28 4.1 Summary 28 4.2 Key Text: Enuma Elish 32 5. Questions 38 5.1 Is Genesis 1 a ‘recension’ of Enuma elish of any other ANE Text? 38 5.2 What preceded creation in ANE creation accounts? 40 5.3 How was creation understood in the ANE? 42 5.4 Is the act of creation limited or conditioned by the ‘material’? 44 5.5 How was the world pictured in the ANE? 44 6. Conclusion: ANE and Post-Biblical Categories 47 CHAPTER 3: CREATION FROM NOTHING 49 1. Introduction 49 1.1 A Sketch 49 1.2 What Does a Doctrine Do? 51 1.3 A Terminological Clarification: Creation Ex Nihilo 55 1.4 A Threefold Organization 56 2. God Creates from Nothing 57 2.1 Trinity and Creation 58 2.2 Transcendence and Presence 65 2.3 The Act of Creation 69 3. The World is Created from Nothing 72 3.1 Contingence 73 3.2 Dependence 75 3.3 Goodness 76 3.4 Conclusion 83 4. Living as Creatures Created from Nothing 83 4.1 Dual Agency 84 4.2 The Self-Involving Force of Creation Ex Nihilo 86 4.3 The Problem of Sin and Evil 91 5. Conclusion: On the Possible Failure of Creation Ex Nihilo 93 CHAPTER 4: BIBLICAL PRESSURE AND EX NIHILO HERMENEUTICS 97 1. Introduction: The Sudden Emergence of Creation Ex Nihilo 97 2. Gerhard May’s Account of Creation Ex Nihilo in Early Christian Thought 99 2.1 Background in Jewish, Christian, and Hellenistic 100 2.1.1 Early Jewish Sources 100 2.1.2 Early Christian Sources 103 2.1.3 Hellenistic Philosophy 104 2.2 Second Century Attempts to Formulate a Doctrine of Creation 110 2.2.1 Gnostic Approaches to the Doctrine of Creation 110 2.2.2 The Emergence of the Church Doctrine of Creation Ex Nihilo 114 2.3 Evaluation of May’s Argument 121 3. Biblical Pressure 124 3.1 Exegesis 127 3.1.1 Luke 18:27 127 3.1.2 Romans 4:17 129 3.2 Implications 132 3.3 Restating the Question 133 CHAPTER 5: THE DEBATED SYNTAX OF GENESIS 1:1-3 135 1. Introduction 135 2. ‘When God Set About to Create…’ 135 2.1 Speiser’s Argument 136 2.1.1 Grammatical Analysis 136 2.1.2 The Argument from Parallels 137 2.1.3 Argument from the Logic of Genesis 1 138 2.2. Testing Speiser’s Proposal 138 2.2.1 Scrutinizing the Grammatical Analysis 139 2.2.2 Reexamining the Purported Parallels 144 2.2.3 Discovering the Logic of Genesis 1 146 2.2.4 Conclusion 147 3. ‘In the Beginning When God Created…’ 148 3.1 Holmstedt’s Argument 148 3.1.1 Possible Options 148 3.1.2 The ‘Construct-Relative’ Option 149 3.2 Testing Holmstedt’s Proposal 151 3.2.1 Homstedt’s Assumptions 151 3.2.2 Holmstedt’s Evidence 152 3.2.3 Larger Issues, Mostly Conceptual 156 3.3 Conclusion 158 4. ‘In the Beginning, God Created the Heavens and the Earth’ 158 4.1 The Use of the Definite Article with r’šyt 158 4.2 The Absolute Use of r’šyt 161 4.3 The Syntax of r’šyt 163 4.4 The Use of the Qatal Form at the Beginning of Narrative Units 164 4.5 A Structural Argument for Reading Genesis 1:1 as an Independent Clause 164 4.6 Conclusion 165 5. Conclusion 166 Table 1 167 Table 2 170 Table 3 172 CHAPTER 6: GENESIS 1:1 AS THE FIRST ACT OF CREATION 176 1. Jon Levenson and the Persistence of Evil 176 1.1 Introduction 176 1.2 Levenson’s Motivations in Writing 177 1.3 Rejecting Creation Ex Nihilo 177 1.4 Creation as Mastery 179 1.5 Levenson’s Reading of Genesis 1 180 1.6 The Relationship between Genesis 1 and Other Creation Texts 182 1.7 An Existential Construal of the Doctrine of Creation 183 1.8 Levenson’s Argument in a Different Key 184 2. An Evaluation of Jon Levenson’s Theology of Creation 185 2.1 The Need for Clarification 185 2.1.1 Clarifying Terms 185 2.1.2 Clarifying Texts 187 2.1.3 Clarifying Enuma elish 189 2.2 A Difficult Picture of God 192 2.2.1 What Kind of Lord is God? 192 2.2.2 Does God Become Actualized in Creation? 195 2.2.3 Is it Problematic if Violence is Intrinsic to Creation? 197 2.3 The Ethics of Reading Genesis 1 199 2.4 Conclusion 200 3. Genesis 1:1 as Heading to the Narrative 201 3.1 An Exposition of Gunkel’s Interpretation of Genesis 1:1-2 201 3.2 An Evaluation of Gunkel’s Interpretation of Genesis 1:1-2 205 3.3 Reformulating Gunkel’s Interpretation within a Canonical Approach 207 4. Genesis 1:1 as the First Act of Creation 210 4.1 Two Senses of šmym 210 4.2 Bipartite and Tripartite Cosmological Formulae 213 4.3 Genesis 1:1 as the First Step in Creation 215 5. Further Questions 222 5.1 How Should We Picture the Cosmology of Genesis 1? 222 5.2 How Should We Conceive of God’s Transcendence and Presence in Genesis 1? 224 5.3 Why Does God Initially Create the Earth in an Uninhabitable State? 225 5.4 Conclusion 229 CHAPTER 7: IN CONCLUSION: A WAY FORWARD 231 1. Introduction 231 2. Creation Ex Nihilo as a Framework for Reading Genesis 1 232 3. John 1 and the Canonical Context of Genesis 1 235 4. Conclusion 236 APPENDIX 1: DOES CREATION EX NIHILO INVOLVE HISTORICAL TRUTH-CLAIMS? 237 APPENDIX 2: SUPPORT FROM THE VERSIONS 240 1. Masoretic Text 241 2. Targums 242 3. Septuagint 243 4. Hexapla 246 5. Conclusion and Prospectus 247 BIBLIOGRAPHY 249 DECLARATION AND STATEMENT OF COPYRIGHT This thesis is the product of my own work and does not include work that has been presented in any form for a degree at this or any other university.
Recommended publications
  • One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards a Symposium

    One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards a Symposium

    One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards A Symposium Edited By Victor B. Brezik, C.S.B, CENTER FOR THOMISTIC STUDIES University of St. Thomas Houston, Texas 77006 ~ NIHIL OBSTAT: ReverendJamesK. Contents Farge, C.S.B. Censor Deputatus INTRODUCTION . 1 IMPRIMATUR: LOOKING AT THE PAST . 5 Most Reverend John L. Morkovsky, S.T.D. A Remembrance Of Pope Leo XIII: The Encyclical Aeterni Patris, Leonard E. Boyle,O.P. 7 Bishop of Galveston-Houston Commentary, James A. Weisheipl, O.P. ..23 January 6, 1981 The Legacy Of Etienne Gilson, Armand A. Maurer,C.S.B . .28 The Legacy Of Jacques Maritain, Christian Philosopher, First Printing: April 1981 Donald A. Gallagher. .45 LOOKING AT THE PRESENT. .61 Copyright©1981 by The Center For Thomistic Studies Reflections On Christian Philosophy, All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or Ralph McInerny . .63 reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written Thomism And Today's Crisis In Moral Values, Michael permission, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in Bertram Crowe . .74 critical articles and reviews. For information, write to The Transcendental Thomism, A Critical Assessment, Center For Thomistic Studies, 3812 Montrose Boulevard, Robert J. Henle, S.J. 90 Houston, Texas 77006. LOOKING AT THE FUTURE. .117 Library of Congress catalog card number: 80-70377 Can St. Thomas Speak To The Modem World?, Leo Sweeney, S.J. .119 The Future Of Thomistic Metaphysics, ISBN 0-9605456-0-3 Joseph Owens, C.Ss.R. .142 EPILOGUE. .163 The New Center And The Intellectualism Of St. Thomas, Printed in the United States of America Vernon J.
  • Evolution As a Christian Theme

    Evolution As a Christian Theme

    Evolution as a Christian Theme Ernan McMullin University of Notre Dame . Setting the scene The title I have chosen is likely to seem provocative to the average American reader, I suppose. Evolution as a Christian theme? When school boards across the U.S. are being told that the theory of evolution poses a threat to the Christian faith of those for whom they are responsible? When the teaching of evolution has come to be associated with the widest variety of social ills in the minds of a sizeable percentage of the U.S. population? However did it come to this? Turn the clock back a century or so to when Darwin’s hypothesis about the transformation of species over time had come to be accepted by the vast majority of the scientific community. In his book Darwinism and the Divine in America, Jon Roberts remarks that at this point: “most Protestant intellectuals … like most other literate Americans … regarded the scientific community’s endorsement of the transmutation hypothesis as sufficient grounds for believing that it was a valid interpretation of the origin of life.” As believing Christians, they had thus become convinced that it was necessary: “to set the tenets of Christian theology within an evolutionary framework. Toward this end, they took the position that gradual, continuous and progressive change was paradigmatic of the way that God had chosen to operate.” 1 “Theistic evolutionism,” as this view came to be called, took different forms, reflecting the variety of scientific opinions at the time about the mechanisms of evolution, and specifically about the sufficiency of natural selection as an explanation of evolutionary transformation.
  • THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA an Hexaëmeral Reading

    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA an Hexaëmeral Reading

    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA An Hexaëmeral Reading of Bonaventure’s Breviloquium A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Theology and Religious Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Daniel Wade McClain Washington, D.C. 2016 An Hexaëmeral Reading of Bonaventure’s Breviloquium Daniel Wade McClain, Ph.D. Director: Joshua Benson, Ph.D. This dissertation examines the structure of Bonaventure’s Breviloquium, a brief synthesis of theology produced in 1257 at the end of his tenure as Master at the University of Paris.1 Previous studies of this text have complicated its structure by emphasizing a distinction in genre between the prologue and the “body,” and by reading the “body” either in terms of the Platonic scheme of procession and return, or in terms of origin, procession, and return, which is a scheme supplied by Bonaventure himself.2 While attending to Bonaventure’s unique theology of the Trinity and Christ as 1 Cf. Jacques-Guy Bougerol, Introduction à Saint Bonaventure (Paris: J. Vrin, 1988), 197; Marianne Schlosser, “Bonaventure: Life and Works,” in A Companion to Bonaventure, ed. Jay M. Hammond, Wayne Hellmann, and Jared Goff (Leiden: Brill, 2013), 24–26. 2 Pedro Bordoy-Torrents, “Técnicas divergentes en la redacción del Breviloquio de San Bonaventura,” Cientia Tomista (1940): 442-51; Paula Jean Miller, F.S.E, Marriage: the Sacrament of Divine-Human Communion (Quincy, IL: Franciscan Press, 1995); Dominic Monti, O.F.M., “Introduction,” in Breviloquium (St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2005), xlviii-xlix; and Joshua C. Benson, “The Christology of the Breviloquium,” in A Companion to Bonaventure, 247–287.
  • FAITH & Reason

    FAITH & Reason

    FAITH & REASON THE JOURNAL of CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE Summer 1978 | Vol. IV, No. 2 Creation and Life’s Purpose: Augustine’s Quest for Truth Rev. Frederick L. Miller As one of the most influential set of ideas in Christian history, St. Augustine’s thought is always significant. Long before he was a Father of the Church, however, Augustine was a man locked in a desperate search for Truth. Realizing that Truth is simply the face of reality, Augustine sought to ap- prehend the nature of the universe in creation itself.. And in understanding the Christian doctrine of creation, this greatest of all Fathers found the beginning, explanation and end of man. In the article following, Rev. Frederick Miller summarizes Augustine’s quest, describes his method and expounds his conclusions. The resulting study awakens the reader to a fuller appreciation of the gift of life and the purpose of all created goods. CAN THINK OF NO BOOK WHICH `SHIFTS gears’ AS THOROUGHLY AS THE CONFES- sions of St. Augustine. Books I through X tell in beautiful detail and eloquent style of Augustine’s spiritual ruination and rejuvenation. Michelangelo’s Last Judgment with its uncanny descent of the damned and ascent of the blessed captures the inner movement of the work. One experiences a sweeping confusion leading to a fall, or better, to many intellectual and moral ‘falls’ which equal destruction. But one concomitantly experi- ences a triumphant, though bloody, ascent to truth and fullness of life. No modern novel can rival in intensity and excitement the story of Augustine’s quest. And then comes the shifting of gears.
  • Page 60 Next Page >

    Page 60 Next Page >

    < previous page page_60 next page > Page 60 2 The intellectual foundations of the early state With the imagined community—the nation—people feel that they share bonds of common interest and inherited values with others, most of whom they will never see. It is a vision of people. By contrast, the state is a vision of power, a mixture of myth and procedure that twines itself amidst the sense of community, giving it political structure. In the modern world the state has become the universal unit of supreme organization. No part of the land of planet Earth does not belong to one. Like it or not most people are born members of a state, even if they live in remote and isolated communities. The stateless are the disadvantaged of the world, anachronistic. Its powers have grown so inescapable that, at least in the English language, the word ‘state’ has taken on a sinister overtone. What are the roots of this condition, this vast surrender by the many and presumption by the few? People have recognized the state as an abstract entity only since the time of the Classical Greeks. But the real history of the state is much longer. If we move further back in time to the early civilizations—of which Egypt was one—we can observe the basic elements of modern states already present and functioning vigorously, yet doing so in the absence of objective awareness of what was involved. The existence of the state was either simply taken for granted or presented in terms which do not belong to the vocabulary of reason and philosophy which is part of our inheritance from the Classical world.
  • Egypt's Hieroglyphs Contain a Cultural Memory of Creation and Noah's Flood

    Egypt's Hieroglyphs Contain a Cultural Memory of Creation and Noah's Flood

    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 7 Article 36 2013 Egypt's Hieroglyphs Contain a Cultural Memory of Creation and Noah's Flood Gavin M. Cox Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Cox, Gavin M. (2013) "Egypt's Hieroglyphs Contain a Cultural Memory of Creation and Noah's Flood," The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 7 , Article 36. Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol7/iss1/36 Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Creationism. Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Science Fellowship EGYPT'S HIEROGLYPHS CONTAIN CULTURAL MEMORIES OF CREATION AND NOAH'S FLOOD Gavin M. Cox, BA Hons (Theology, LBC). 26 The Firs Park, Bakers Hill, Exeter, Devon, UK, EX2 9TD. KEYWORDS: Flood, onomatology, eponym, Hermopolitan Ogdoad, Edfu, Heliopolis, Memphis, Hermopolis, Ennead, determinative, ideograph, hieroglyphic, Documentary Hypothesis (DH). ABSTRACT A survey of standard Egyptian Encyclopedias and earliest mythology demonstrates Egyptian knowledge of Creation and the Flood consistent with the Genesis account.
  • Quareia—The Adept Module VIII—Mediation of Power Lesson 8: the Core

    Quareia—The Adept Module VIII—Mediation of Power Lesson 8: the Core

    Quareia—The Adept Module VIII—Mediation of Power Lesson 8: The Core by Josephine McCarthy Quareia Welcome Welcome to this lesson of the Quareia curriculum. The Quareia takes a magical apprentice from the beginning of magic to the level of adeptship and beyond. The course has no superfluous text; there is no dressing, no padding—everything is in its place and everything within the course has a good reason to be there. For more information and all course modules please visit www.quareia.com So remember—in order for this course to work, it is wise to work with the lessons in sequence. If you don’t, it won’t work. Yours, Quareia—The Adept Module VIII—Mediation of Power Lesson 8: The Core We have spiralled around various aspects of power mediation, of polarity and sources of power, and for the final lesson in this module we will work with the Core. To work with the Core without any reference points is very difficult, though you will touch on it at some point in your life as a mature adept. You have also, from the very beginning of your training, been inching your way towards the understanding and power of the Core. So for this lesson we will return to the Egyptian patterns, as they are the most solid reference points for this type of work. You have touched on the Core at different points in your training, and looked at the different layers of the Core as and when appropriate. Now we bring those layers together into a coherent Egyptian form that you will work with, which will give you a deeper understanding of the principle, but also anchor your power in the Core so that all your power mediation will flow from the very deep principle that underlines all magic, all life, and all expression.
  • Ennead Atum Also Called Atem Or Tem He Was the Creator of the Other

    Ennead Atum Also Called Atem Or Tem He Was the Creator of the Other

    Ennead Atum ● also called Atem or Tem ● he was the creator of the other gods and he created himself ● him and Ra were both sun deities, but he was specifically associated with the sun in evening ● father of Shu and Tefnut ● when his children wandered away into the primordial darkness, he sent the eye of Ra to find them ○ his tears of joy upon their return became the first humans ● wore a royal head cloth or the crown of the united Upper­Lower Egypt ● sat on the Benben mound Shu ● personification of air ● created by Atum and Iusaaset, or sneezed out of Atum’s mouth (or ejaculated­out of his penis) ● wears an ostrich feather and carries an ankh ● associated with calmness ● once he argued with Tefnut and she ran away from Egypt for awhile, where she became a man eating cat, until Thoth convinced her to come back Tefnut ● goddess of moisture and rain ● wife and sister of Shu ● her father was Ra­Atum, the sun god ● all stories of her creation involve her father swallowing bodily fluids and spitting it out ○ her name is related to the word “to spit” ● has a lioness’s head Geb ● god of the earth and husband/brother of Nur ● when he laughed, earthquakes occurred ● often referred to as the father of snakes, and depicted with a snake head ● plants including barley grew on him ● the goose was sacred to him, so he was sometimes called “The Great Honker” Nut ● daughter of Shu and Tefnut and wife/sister of Geb ● depicted with a pot on her head ● sometimes depicted as a giant cow or a sycamore tree ● Ra wouldn’t let her have children on any day of the
  • 2019: Alexandria, Virginia

    2019: Alexandria, Virginia

    THE 70TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN RESEARCH CENTER IN EGYPT April 12-14, 2019 Washington, D.C. ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN RESEARCH CENTER IN EGYPT April 12-14, 2019 Washington, D.C. U.S. Headquarters 909 North Washington Street, Suite 320 Alexandria, Virginia, 22314 703.721.3479 Cairo Center 2 Midan Simón Bolívar Garden City, Cairo, 11461 20.2.2794.8239 [email protected] 2 3 *Dr. Ahmed Abu-Zayed, Head of Libraries and Archives TABLE CONTENTS Janie Abdul Aziz, Grant Administrator of *Djodi Deutsch, Academic Programs Manager Itinerary 12 Zakaria Yacoub, IT Manager Session Schedule 14 *Sally El Sabbahy, Communications & Outreach Associate *Samira El Adawy, Programs Coordinator Presentation Abstracts 18 Andreas Kostopoulos, Project Archives Specialist Student Poster Abstracts 99 Noha Atef Halim, Assistant Finance Manager Yasser Tharwat, Project Financial & Reporting Manager ARCE STAFF Doaa Adel, Accountant U.S. Staff Salah Metwally, Associate for Governmental Affairs Osama Abdel Fatah Mohamed , Supervising Librarian *Dr. Fatma Ismail, Interim US Operations Director Amira Gamal, Cataloguing Librarian *Michael Wiles, Chief Financial Officier Reda Anwar, Administrative Assistant to Office Manager *Laura Rheintgen, Director of Development Salah Rawash, Security & Reception Coordinator *Dr. Heba Abdel Salam, US Programs Advisor Abdrabou Ali Hassan, Maintenance Assistant & Director’s Driver *Claire Haymes, Board Relations Manager Ahmed Hassan, Senior Traffic Department Officer & Driver *Megan Allday, Annual Meeting Coordinator (Consultant) Ramadan Khalil Abdou, ARCE Representative Ellen Flanagan, US Human Resources Coordinator (Consultant) Mohamed Hassan Mohamed, Transportation Assistant & Messenger *Rebecca Cook, Membership & Development Manager Eid Fawzy, Technical Clerk & Messenger Freddy Feliz, IT Manager Nour Ibrahim, Messenger *Beth Wang, Development & Research Assistant ARCE STAFF ARCE STAFF Cairo Staff Luxor Staff *Dr.
  • Copyrighted Material

    Copyrighted Material

    Index abduction, as scientific reasoning Blackmore, Susan 257, 259 process 198–9 “blending inheritance” 151 Addison, Joseph 70, 72–3, 101 Bohm, David 37 animals, status of 169–71 Bonaventura of Bagnoregio 17 Aquinas, Thomas 69, 189, 191–2, 227 Boyer, Pascal 259, 266 Arbuthnot, John 71 Boyle, Robert 65, 69, 91 Aristotle 189 Boyle Lectures 69–70 Athanasius of Alexandria 114 Bridgewater Treatises 5, 119–26 Atran, Scott 259 Brooke, John Hedley 16–17 Augustan Age 49–50 Brougham, Henry Lord 112–15 Augustine of Hippo 15, 114, 220, Browning, Robert 130–3 222–9, 232, 280, 285 Brunner, Emil 279 on rationes seminales 222–8, 230, Buckland, William 110–11, 120, 221 232–3 Buffon, George Louis 100, 149 Ayala, Francisco J. 190–1 Chalmers, Thomas 120, 122 Bacon, Francis 75 Chambers, Robert 166 Baer, Karl Ernst von 161 Charleton, Walter 53 Barrett, Justin 267 Cicero, Marcus Tullius 13–14 Barth, Karl 18, 51 Clifford, William K. 153–4 Barrow, Isaac 74 contrivance, notion of 53–4, 63–70, Bauman, Zygmunt 221 91–7, 156–7 Beagle, H. M. S. 144–5 Cooke, Josiah Parsons 194 Bell, Charles COPYRIGHTED120, 122 Copernicus, MATERIAL Nicolaus 28, 37 Bentley, Richard 69–70 Cottingham, John 18 Berger, Peter 57 creation, doctrine of, and natural Black Beauty (1877) 170 theology 61–3, 217–33 Blackmore, Richard 70 in Augustine of Hippo 222–9 Darwinism and the Divine: Evolutionary Thought and Natural Theology, First Edition. Alister E. McGrath. © 2011 Alister E. McGrath. Published 2011 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. MMcGrath_bindex.inddcGrath_bindex.indd 229494 112/3/20102/3/2010
  • BONAVENTURE Does Not Give an Isolated Treatment

    BONAVENTURE Does Not Give an Isolated Treatment

    c Peter King, in Individuation and Scholasticism (SUNY 1994), 141–172 BONAVENTURE’S THEORY OF INDIVIDUATION* 1. Introduction ONAVENTURE does not give an isolated treatment of individuation, addressing it only in the context of largely B theological concerns; nevertheless, a clear and coherent gen- eral theory of individuation can be extracted from his scattered remarks. Bonaventure identifies the metaphysical principles of matter and form in- trinsic to a thing as jointly necessary to account for the individuality of the individual, and, when such principles produce a substantial unity, to entail the distinctness of the individual from all else. His detailed explanation of how these principles concur in the metaphysical constitution of the indi- vidual is subtle and complex, crucially depending on an alignment of the form/matter distinction with the act/potency distinction. Since Bonaven- ture explicitly denies that there is any single principle or cause of individ- uation, maintaining instead that the minimal unit of analysis is a pair of jointly necessary principles, his theory is strikingly different from other the- ories put forward in this period; it is similar in some respects to the theory advanced much later by Su´arez(see J. Gracia’s contribution to this volume). It is not clear that Bonaventure’s alternative approach can ultimately be successful. Nevertheless, an examination of his treatment of individuation proves to be rewarding, because his approach calls into question several as- sumptions that are uncritically adopted in more traditional approaches to the problem of individuation. The discussion will proceed as follows. In §2, the criteria Bonaventure adopts for individuality and associated notions such as singularity and in- communicability will be examined.
  • Science and Religion Previously Published Records of Building Bridges Seminars

    Science and Religion Previously Published Records of Building Bridges Seminars

    Science and Religion Previously Published Records of Building Bridges Seminars The Road Ahead: A Christian-Muslim Dialogue, Michael Ipgrave, Editor (London: Church House, 2002) Scriptures in Dialogue: Christians and Muslims Studying the Bible and the Qur’a¯n Together, Michael Ipgrave, Editor (London: Church House, 2004) Bearing the Word: Prophecy in Biblical and Qur’a¯nic Perspective, Michael Ipgrave, Editor (London: Church House, 2005) Building a Better Bridge: Muslims, Christians, and the Common Good, Michael Ipgrave, Editor (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2008) Justice and Rights: Christian and Muslim Perspectives, Michael Ipgrave, Editor (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2009) Humanity: Texts and Contexts: Christian and Muslim Perspectives, Michael Ipgrave and David Marshall, Editors (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2011) Communicating the Word: Revelation, Translation, and Interpretation in Christianity and Islam, David Marshall, Editor (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2011) For further information about the Building Bridges seminar, please visit http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/resources/networks/building_bridges. Science and Religion CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM PERSPECTIVES A record of the eighth Building Bridges seminar convened by the Archbishop of Canterbury Bahc¸es¸ehir University, Istanbul, June 16–18, 2009 DAVID MARSHALL, Editor GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY PRESS Washington, DC ᭧ 2012 Georgetown University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Unless otherwise noted, biblical texts are from New Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright 1989, Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America.