Melanocytic Slide Club Case

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Melanocytic Slide Club Case M87. Lumbar back. Irregular pigmented lesion. Melanocytic Club 213 Dr Richard Carr Warwick Hospital Slide Club Panel •Compound naevus with atypia •Benign compound naevus with area showing mildly atypical, active junctional nests and dermal sclerosis. No dermal mitotic activity or expansile nests. Radial margin 3mm. I favour a naevus with odd dermal sclerosis, but no convincing features for melanoma. •A compound nevus with congenital pattern features, and an adjacent region where there is fibroplasia with thickening of the papillary dermis, underlying mature nevus cells, and an overlying atypical junctional and superficial dermal proliferation. I believe these changes are consistent with a "fibrosing dysplastic nevus" as has been described in several series under various names. The asymmetrical character of the fibrosis is unusual. Diagnosis: Compound nevus with congenital pattern features, and adjacent fibrosing severely dysplastic changes, completely excised. Slide Club Panel •Compound naevus with some atypia. Considered dysplasia but may have been traumatised. No convincing evidence of melanoma. •Dysplastic naevus •Compound melanocytic nevus with one sclerotic area mimicking melanoma, probably due to associated lichen sclerosus et atrophicus or another sclerotic process involving superficial dermis. •Focal scarring in a compound naevus. Scar has created area of junctional atypia. Needs clinical correlation to determine whether the lesion has been traumatised. •Favour predominantly intradermal compound melanocytic naevus, peripheral region showing dysplastic changes involving the junctional zone. Some minor dermal scarring (? prior trauma or possibly superficial dermal regression) beneath the focus showing dysplastic changes (clinicopathological correlation). We cannot see convincing evidence for in situ malignancy and no evidence of dermal invasive malignancy is seen Slide Club Panel •I would favour a benign lesion. One shoulder with hyaline fibrosis in the dermis and a flattened epidermis with increased junctional activity with some atypia, but no ascending cells (recurrent nevus like). Previous treatment or traumatisation? DD regression seems less likely to me. In case of complete excision I would favour a wait and see policy, also taken into account the patients's age. •The lesion is unusual in 87 yrs-old. Melanocytes are irregular, but I could not see mitoses or necrotic melanocytes. For excluding nevoid melanoma I would apply IHC and particularly Ki67 •These lesions with nests of cells in regressed areas are often very difficult to classify in the absence of severe cytological atypia or dermal mitotic activity. Treat as for invasive melanoma Slide Club Panel • Atypical biphasic lesion: atypical intra-epidermal and dermal nevoid melanoctyic proliferation with papillary dermal hyalinization, biologically indeterminate, arising in a compound nevus. The lesion is clearly concerning for neoplastic progression to "nevoid" melanoma with regression and thickness of about 1 mm (no mitoses or ulceration). However, I consider the lesion indeterminate and to lack sufficient criteria for unequivocal melanoma. Would advise re-excision in order to achieve about 1 cm margins. Controversial lesion undoubtedly eliciting interpretations of benign, borderline, and malignant. • Superficial spreading melanoma, also compound naevus. • Junctional component looks atypical and this would be MIS, but the dark naevoid cells in dermis are not the same as other dermal cells and I would be suspicious that these were also malignant so would call this vertical GP. Slide Club Panel • The architecture is very asymmetrical with at one side a classic combined nevus with “congenital like architecture” and at the other side a disorganized mainly junctional proliferation of large epithelioid pigmented melanocytes. This cytology is rather typical of SSM, pagetoid spread is however not clearly present. Some extension to pilar sheath is seen at one side. The difficulty is the evaluation of the Breslow and Clark measures. There are some superficial dermal nests that harbor the same cytology as the malignant junctional nests. No mitotic figure was seen. Clinically the irregular pigmentation is explained by the lateral amount of melanophages surrounding those dermal nests. The whole melanocytic lesion (melanoma + nevus) does not exceed 1mm thickness but I cannot precisely measure the Breslow. It is usually recommended to analyze at least 6 sections to evaluate mitotic activity. I would recommend 1cm margins and surveillance. Case 214. M76. Right upper abdomen. Longstanding naeuvs, changed last 3/12. ?DN, ?MM Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital Slide Club Panel • Compound dysplastic naevus with moderate cytological atypia and an area of superficial dermal fibrosis, but no other worrying features for an invasive-type melanoma. Radial margin 2mm. Had the lesion been traumatised? • Dysplastic naevus • “Dysplastic junctional melanocytic nevus with a focus of metaplastic ossification in the underlying dermis.” • “favour a superficially "irritated" pigmented predominantly junctional dysplastic naevus with patchy superficial dermal regression. We cannot see histological evidence for malignancy in the residual part of the lesion in the section sent for review. Slide Club Panel • SSM with partial regression. Clearly atypical melanocytes, lots of single cells that are ascending within the epidermis. Also in part atypical dermal component and clearly regression • Microinvasive melanoma to be treated as in situ melanoma. • Focal suprabasal spread just amounting to in situ melanoma, perhaps in an atypical naevus. Small possible dermal component, no mitoses in it, uncertain malignant potential - would do levels and treat as for pT1a melanoma • Severe junctional naevus v Melanoma in situ. Just enough atypia and confluence for MIS. Possible focal invasion but would like to see more sections • Melanoma, Clark III, 0,3mm with focal regression in toto excised; additional finding osteoma cutis in dermis. Slide Club Panel • “Borderline lesion with significant atypia. On balance severe dysplasia is favoured over melanoma.” • A superficial moderately to highly cellular proliferation of spindled to epithelioid melanocytes, about 3 mm in diameter on the slide. There is moderate nuclear variability with a few scattered larger nuclei. There are bridging nests. Differential diagnosis includes a severely dysplastic nevus versus a pigmented spindle cell nevus. There is moderate actinic elastosis, tending to favor the former diagnosis, although the small size tends to favor the latter. Diagnosis: Superficial atypical melanocytic proliferation of uncertain significance most consistent with a severely dysplastic nevus, completely excised. • Severely atypical compound melanocytic lesion bordering on early melanoma. Slide Club Panel • Atypical lentiginous compound melanocytic proliferation with evidence of partial regression. Small diameter (~4 mm); asymmetrical; contiguous atypical lentiginous melanocytic proliferation; limited pagetoid scatter; solar elastosis. I consider the lesion indeterminate but one can make the case for incipient melanoma in situ with partial regression because of contiguous atypical melanocytic proliferation, evolving in a lentiginous dysplastic nevus. Would advise final surgical margins of about 5 mm. Another undoubtedly controversial lesion with interpretations of benign (dysplastic nevus), borderline, and malignant. • Atypical junctional component is at least MIS - not sure if dermal component so would call radial GP. • very difficult case...overlapping elements... mainly junctional with at the center a nested architecture of mid-sized pigmented spindled melanocytes associated with epidermal papillary hyperplasia... as long standing pre-existing nevus. At each side there is a dermal fibrosis with inflammation and blood vessels ectatic and an interruption of the papillary epidermal architecture. junctional nests to left side above the fibrosis (when epidermis is up) are atypical both by their architecture (continuous junctional proliferation binding thecal and lentiginous patterns) and cytology (large epithelioid melanocytes). Underneath there are several calcinosis indicative of prior folliculitis in the nevus. In our experience folliculitis can induced shortly after their resolution fibro-inflammatory reactions in the upper dermis of nevi (especially congenital nevi who have larger hair shafts that are more prone to folliculitis). In that setting some degree of atypia is induced in the surrounding melanocytes (both junctional and dermal). The calcinosis indicates however that these folliculitis took place a while ago. On the section with the less visible lesion there are images of pagetoid spreading along with with a dermal lymphocytic inflammatory reaction. The melanocytes are however not clearly atypical. The clinical presentation is globally worrisome and I suspect a lateral transformation of a pre-existing nevi. There are no dermal nests by fibrous modification that could be regressive. This regression would hamper both Breslow and clark evaluation. I would recommend 1cm margins and surveillance as for an early invasive melanoma. A clinical picture would maybe help me in this case. Piepkorn MW, Barnhill RL, Elder DE, Knezevich SR, Carney PA, Reisch LM, Elmore JG. The MPATH-Dx reporting schema for melanocytic proliferations and melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Jan;70(1):131-41. MPATH-Dx is a research and potentially diagnostic reporting tool “greater agreement
Recommended publications
  • Acral Compound Nevus SJ Yun S Korea
    University of Pennsylvania, Founded by Ben Franklin in 1740 Disclosures Consultant for Myriad Genetics and for SciBase (might try to sell you a book, as well) Multidimensional Pathway Classification of Melanocytic Tumors WHO 4th Edition, 2018 Epidemiologic, Clinical, Histologic and Genomic Aspects of Melanoma David E. Elder, MB ChB, FRCPA University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Napa, May, 2018 3rd Edition, 2006 Malignant Melanoma • A malignant tumor of melanocytes • Not all melanomas are the same – variation in: – Epidemiology – risk factors, populations – Cell/Site of origin – Precursors – Clinical morphology – Microscopic morphology – Simulants – Genomic abnormalities Incidence of Melanoma D.M. Parkin et al. CSD/Site-Related Classification • Bastian’s CSD/Site-Related Classification (Taxonomy) of Melanoma – “The guiding principles for distinguishing taxa are genetic alterations that arise early during progression; clinical or histologic features of the primary tumor; characteristics of the host, such as age of onset, ethnicity, and skin type; and the role of environmental factors such as UV radiation.” Bastian 2015 Epithelium associated Site High UV Low UV Glabrous Mucosa Benign Acquired Spitz nevus nevus Atypical Dysplastic Spitz Borderline nevus tumor High Desmopl. Low-CSD Spitzoid Acral Mucosal Malignant CSD melanoma melanoma melanoma melanoma melanoma 105 Point mutations 103 Structural Rearrangements 2018 WHO Classification of Melanoma • Integrates Epidemiologic, Genomic, Clinical and Histopathologic Features • Assists
    [Show full text]
  • Short Course 11 Pigmented Lesions of the Skin
    Rev Esp Patol 1999; Vol. 32, N~ 3: 447-453 © Prous Science, SA. © Sociedad Espafiola de Anatomfa Patol6gica Short Course 11 © Sociedad Espafiola de Citologia Pigmented lesions of the skin Chairperson F Contreras Spain Ca-chairpersons S McNutt USA and P McKee, USA. Problematic melanocytic nevi melanin pigment is often evident. Frequently, however, the lesion is solely intradermal when it may be confused with a fibrohistiocytic RH. McKee and F.R.C. Path tumor, particularly epithelloid cell fibrous histiocytoma (4). It is typi- cally composed of epitheliold nevus cells with abundant eosinophilic Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, cytoplasm and large, round, to oval vesicular nuclei containing pro- USA. minent eosinophilic nucleoli. Intranuclear cytoplasmic pseudoinclu- sions are common and mitotic figures are occasionally present. The nevus cells which are embedded in a dense, sclerotic connective tis- Whether the diagnosis of any particular nevus is problematic or not sue stroma, usually show maturation with depth. Less frequently the nevus is composed solely of spindle cells which may result in confu- depends upon a variety of factors, including the experience and enthusiasm of the pathologist, the nature of the specimen (shave vs. sion with atrophic fibrous histiocytoma. Desmoplastic nevus can be distinguished from epithelloid fibrous histiocytoma by its paucicellu- punch vs. excisional), the quality of the sections (and their staining), larity, absence of even a focal storiform growth pattern and SiQO pro- the hour of the day or day of the week in addition to the problems relating to the ever-increasing range of histological variants that we tein/HMB 45 expression.
    [Show full text]
  • Melanocytic Lesions of the Face—SW Mccarthy & RA Scolyer 3 Review Article
    Melanocytic Lesions of the Face—SW McCarthy & RA Scolyer 3 Review Article Melanocytic Lesions of the Face: Diagnostic Pitfalls* 1,2 1,2 SW McCarthy, MBBS, FRCPA, RA Scolyer, MBBS, FRCPA Abstract The pathologist often has a difficult task in evaluating melanocytic lesions. For lesions involving the face the consequences of misdiagnosis are compounded for both cosmetic and therapeutic reasons. In this article, the pathological features of common and uncommon benign and malignant melanocytic lesions are reviewed and pitfalls in their diagnosis are highlighted. Benign lesions resembling melanomas include regenerating naevus, “irritated” naevus, com- bined naevus, “ancient naevus”, Spitz naevus, dysplastic naevus, halo naevus, variants of blue naevi, balloon and clear cell naevi, neurotised naevus and desmoplastic naevus. Melanomas that can easily be missed on presentation include desmoplastic, naevoid, regressed, myxoid and metastatic types as well as so-called malignant blue naevi. Pathological clues to benign lesions include good symmetry, V-shaped silhouette, absent epidermal invasion, uniform cellularity, deep maturation, absent or rare dermal mitoses and clustered Kamino bodies. Features more commonly present in melanomas include asymmetry, peripheral epidermal invasion, heavy or “dusty” pigmentation, deep and abnormal dermal mitoses, HMB45 positivity in deep dermal melanocytes, vascular invasion, neurotropism and satellites. Familiarity with the spectrum of melanocytic lesions and knowledge of the important distinguishing features should
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Melanoma Clinically Resembling Seborrheic Keratosis Analysis of 9204 Cases
    STUDY Prevalence of Melanoma Clinically Resembling Seborrheic Keratosis Analysis of 9204 Cases Leonid Izikson, BS; Arthur J. Sober, MD; Martin C. Mihm, Jr, MD, FRCP; Artur Zembowicz, MD, PhD Objective: To estimate the prevalence of melanoma clini- Main Outcome Measure: Histological diagnosis, which cally mimicking seborrheic keratosis. was correlated with the preoperative clinical diagnosis. Design: Retrospective review of cases submitted for his- Results: Melanoma was identified in 61 cases (0.66%) tological examination with a clinical diagnosis of sebor- submitted for histological examination with a clinical rheic keratosis or with a differential diagnosis that in- diagnosis that included seborrheic keratosis. Melanoma cluded seborrheic keratosis. was in the clinical differential diagnosis of 31 cases (51%). The remaining lesions had a differential diagno- Setting: A tertiary medical care center–based der- sis of seborrheic keratosis vs melanocytic nevus (17 matopathology laboratory serving academic der- cases, 28%), basal cell carcinoma (7 cases, 12%), or a squa- matology clinics that have a busy pigmented lesion mous proliferation (3 cases, 5%). In 3 cases (5%), seb- clinic. orrheic keratosis was the only clinical diagnosis. All histological types of melanoma were represented. Materials and Methods: A total of 9204 consecutive pathology reports containing a diagnosis of seborrheic Conclusions: Our results confirm that melanoma can keratosis in the clinical information field were identi- mimic seborrheic keratosis. These data strongly support fied between the years 1992 and 2001 through a com- the current policy of submitting for histological examina- puter database search. Reports with a final histological tion all specimens that have been removed from patients. diagnosis of melanoma were selected for further review and clinicopathological analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Lumps & Bumps: Approach to Common Dermatologic Neoplasms
    Case-Based Approach to Common Dermatologic Neoplasms Patrick Retterbush, MD, FAAD Mohs Surgery & Dermatologic Oncology Associate Member of the American College of Mohs Surgery Private Practice: Lockman Dermatology January 27th 2018 Disclosure of Relevant Financial Relationships • I do not have any relevant financial relationships, commercial interests, and/or conflicts of interest regarding the content of this presentation. Goals/Objectives • Recognize common benign growths • Recognize common malignant growths • Useful clues & examination for evaluating melanocytic nevi and when to be concerned for melanoma/atypical moles • How to perform a basic skin biopsy and which method/type to choose • Basic treatment/when to refer Key Questions & Physical Examination Findings for a Growth History Physical Examination • How long has the lesion been • Describing a growth present? – flat or raised? • flat – macule (<1cm) or patch (>1cm) – years, months, weeks • raised – papule (<1cm) or plaque (>1cm) – nodule if deep (majority of lesion in • Has it changed? dermis/SQ) – Size – secondary descriptive features • scaly (hyperkeratosis, retention of strateum – Shape corneum) – Color • crusty (dried serum, blood, or pus on surface) • eroded or ulcerated (partial vs. full thickness – Symptoms – pain, bleeding, itch? epidermal loss) – Over what time frame? • color (skin colored, red, pigmented, pearly) • feel (hard or soft, mobile or fixed) • PMH: • size: i.e. 6 x 4mm – prior skin cancers • Look at the rest of the skin/region of skin • SCC/BCCs vs. melanoma
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Diagnostics for Ambiguous Melanocytic Tumors Hilmy Shahbain, BS,* Chelsea Cooper, BA,† and Pedram Gerami, MD‡
    Molecular Diagnostics for Ambiguous Melanocytic Tumors Hilmy Shahbain, BS,* Chelsea Cooper, BA,† and Pedram Gerami, MD‡ Certain subsets of melanocytic neoplasms are difficult to classify because of conflicting histologic features and the existence of a poorly defined intermediate grade of melanocytic tumors. The integration of molecular diagnostic information with a histologic impression may contribute signif- icantly toward improving classification. This review discusses the development of and advances in molecular techniques, including comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hy- bridization (FISH) as diagnostic and prognostic tools for melanocytic neoplasms. Further, we discuss how specific molecular aberrations identified via FISH correlate with certain morphologies in melanocytic neoplasms. We also examine the prognostic value of FISH in intermediate-grade melanocytic tumors, particularly atypical Spitz tumors. Semin Cutan Med Surg 31:274-278 © 2012 Frontline Medical Communications KEYWORDS fluorescence in situ hybridization, FISH, melanoma, Spitz nevi, Spitz tumor he vast majority of conventional melanomas and mela- atypia with clinical behavior identical to that of similarly Tnocytic nevi may be readily classified as entirely benign staged conventional melanomas.5 or malignant using standard microscopy. However, there are 2. The presence of an intermediate grade of melanocytic tu- at least 2 distinct factors responsible for the diagnostic dis- mors shows frequent involvement of sentinel lymph crepancy and uncertainty that dermatopathologists face nodes with significantly less, but occasional, disease pro- when dealing with certain subsets of melanocytic tumors:1-3 gression beyond the sentinel lymph node.6,7 The existence of intermediate-grade melanocytic neoplasms is generally 1. Some lesions that are completely benign or entirely malig- gaining acceptance among the dermatopathology nant in their biologic potential have ambiguous histologic community.8 features that make proper classification difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Pitfalls in Dermatopathology: When Things Are Not What They Seem to Be
    37 Pitfalls in Dermatopathology: When Things Are Not What They Seem To Be Aleodor Andea MD, MBA 2011 Annual Meeting – Las Vegas, NV AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL PATHOLOGY 33 W. Monroe, Ste. 1600 Chicago, IL 60603 37 Pitfalls in Dermatopathology: When Things Are Not What They Seem To Be This session focuses on histological mimickers: skin malignancies that resemble reactive conditions or benign neoplasms, benign conditions that masquerade as malignancies and tumors that are prone to be mistaken for other types of cutaneous malignancies. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of cutaneous neoplasms that may result in diagnostic errors with significant clinical impact will also be presented. Participants will have the opportunity to improve their diagnostic acumen and clinical skills by increasing their awareness of dermatopathology entities that are prone to be misdiagnosed. • Recognize a variety of dermatopathology cases that are prone to be misdiagnosed. • Identify histological features that are useful in preventing pitfalls in diagnosis. • Determine appropriate ancillary studies that help arrive at the correct diagnosis. FACULTY: Aleodor Andea MD, MBA Practicing Pathologists Surgical Pathology Surgical Pathology (Derm, Gyn, Etc.) 1.0 CME/CMLE Credit Accreditation Statement: The American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education (CME) for physicians. This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and Policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME). Credit Designation: The ASCP designates this enduring material for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the Dysplastic Nevus in the 21St Century
    The State of the Dysplastic Nevus in the 21st Century Keith Duffy, MD Associate professor Department of Dermatology University of Utah Department of Dermatology Disclosures • Myriad Genetics – Advisory board; honorarium • Castle Biosciences – Advisory board; honorarium What do I do? • Clinical – 60% Mohs micrographic and reconstructive surgery and high risk skin cancer – 40% Dermatopathology sign-out – Multidisciplinary cutaneous oncology program – Huntsman Cancer Institute • Administrative – Residency Program Director, Dermatology Department of Dermatology Department of Dermatology The current(ish) state of affairs… Do you believe dysplastic (Clark) nevi are truly premalignant lesions? 53% A. Yes B. No 25% C. Unsure 22% A. B. C. How do you report “dysplastic nevi”? A. Dysplastic nevus 62% B. Clark nevus C. Nevus with architectural disorder 19% D. Other 12% 7% A. B. C. D. Do you assign a histologic “grade” to these nevi? 87% A. Yes B. No 13% A. B. If yes, what grading system do you use? A. Cytology as three grades (mild, moderate, 73% severe) B. Cytology and architecture as two separate grades C. Cytology as two grades 8% 10% 10% only D. Other grading system A. B. C. D. Brief history • 1978 – Dr. Clark describes nevi associated with melanoma prone families – The B-K mole syndrome • 1978 – Dr. Lynch describes a single multi- generational family with melanoma and nevi – Familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome (FAMMM) Brief history • 1980 – Dr. Elder and Clark describe ‘dysplastic nevi’ in a non-familial setting – Introduction of the term ‘dysplastic nevus syndrome’ • Familial and sporadic variants • Formally postulated that ‘dysplastic nevi’ are precursors of melanoma Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicolegal Aspects of Neoplastic Dermatology
    Modern Pathology (2006) 19, S148–S154 & 2006 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0893-3952/06 $30.00 www.modernpathology.org Medicolegal aspects of neoplastic dermatology A Neil Crowson Departments of Dermatology, Pathology, and Surgery, University of Oklahoma and Regional Medical Laboratory, St John Medical Center, Tulsa, OK, USA Medical malpractice litigation is rising at an explosive rate in the US and, to a lesser extent, in Canada. The impact of medical malpractice litigation on health care costs and the cost of insurance is dramatic. Certain specialist categories are becoming uninsurable in some parts of the US, while in others, clinicians are retiring early, restricting or changing practice or changing states of residence in consequence of medical malpractice claims and of the cost and availability of insurance. This, in turn, has had the real effect of denying care to patients in some communities in the US. Some 13% of all medical malpractice claims relate to one area of neoplastic dermatopathology, specifically, melanocytic neoplasia. Certain steps can be taken by pathology laboratories to reduce, but never completely eliminate, the risk of medical malpractice claims. In this review, attention is paid to the source of medical malpractice claims and an abbreviated approach to specific strategies for risk management is presented. Modern Pathology (2006) 19, S148–S154. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800518 Keywords: malpractice; dermatopathology; risk management; case review Medical malpractice claims and settlements have pathologist who was formerly deemed to be in the skyrocketed across the US. Some malpractice in- background of patient care. Those clinicians who surers are no longer covering physicians,1 and the practice cosmetic dermatology are at even greater issue of uninsured physicians leaving medical risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Lentigo Maligna Melanoma and Simulants Maui January 2020 Superficial Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations
    Superficial Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations II. Lentigo Maligna Melanoma and Simulants Maui January 2020 Superficial Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations • RGP Melanomas • SSM, LMM, ALM, MLM • Intermediate lesions • Dysplastic nevi, Atypical lentiginous proliferations in high CSD skin; Atypical Acral lentiginous nevi • Superficial atypical melanocytic proliferations • Pagetoid plaque-like Spitz nevi; pigmented spindle cell nevus (Reed) • Special site nevi (genital, breast, scalp, ear, flexural, etc). • Superficial atypical melanocytic proliferations of uncertain significance • Atypical/unusual/uncertain examples of all of the above Superficial Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations • RGP Melanomas • SSM, LMM, ALM, MLM • Intermediate lesions • Dysplastic nevi, Atypical lentiginous proliferations in high CSD skin; Atypical Acral lentiginous nevi • Superficial atypical melanocytic proliferations • Pagetoid plaque-like Spitz nevi; pigmented spindle cell nevus (Reed) • Special site nevi (genital, breast, scalp, ear, flexural, etc). • Superficial atypical melanocytic proliferations of uncertain significance • Atypical/unusual/uncertain examples of all of the above High CSD Melanomas and Simulants. D Elder, Maui, HI Jan 2020 Lentigo maligna melanoma Atypical lentiginous nevi/proliferations High CSD: Lentiginous Nevi and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma and Simulant(s) • Lentiginous Melanoma of Sun-Damaged Skin • LMM in situ • LMM invasive • Distinction from Dysplastic Nevi (Dysplastic Nevus-like Melanoma/Nevoid Lentigo Maligna • Lentiginous Nevi of
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Perspective on Pigmented Lesions
    Australasian Dermatopathology Society Perth 2014 Goeffrey Hunter Oration Borderline Melanocytic Tumors Artur Zembowicz, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Pathology, Tufts Medical School, Boston, MA Medical Director, DermatopathologyConsultations.com, Boston, MA Founder, Dermpedia.org, Boston, MA Senior Consultant in Dermatopathology, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA Melanoma or Not Paradigm of Classification of Melanocytic Tumors A.D. 1990’s Difficult areas in diagnostic pathology Differentiation between atypical nevus and early melanoma Recognition of early lentigo maligna Nevoid melanoma Spitzoid melanocytic tumors Atypical variants of special nevi Atypical proliferative nodules in congenital nevi Borderline Diagnostic Categories in Pathology “Borderline/indeterminate” (MELTUMP/SAMPUS): “difficult to classify”, “with overlapping histological features between benign or malignant”, “challenging”, “controversial”, “equivocal”, etc. Borderline/intermediate distinct nozological category, a specific disease or clinicopathological entity of intermediate malignant potential Animal type melanoma (ATM) Epithelioid blue nevus of ATM •Mean Breslow thickness = 3.3 Carney Complex mm •11/24 patients (46 %) had PEM=EBN lymph node metastases Carney & Ferreiro The Epithelioid Blue Nevus: A Multicentric Familial Tumor With Important Associations, Including Cardiac Myxoma and Psammomatous Melanotic Schwannoma. Am. J. Surg. Path.1996, 259-272 Pigmented Epithelioid Melanocytoma 1. Synonymous with epithelioid blue nevus and includes most cases of previously
    [Show full text]
  • Nevoid Melanoma in the Forearm
    계명의대학술지 제33권 1호 Keimyung Med J Vol. 33, No. 1, June, 2014 Nevoid Melanoma in the Forearm Misun Choe, M.D., Hye Ra Jung, M.D., Gyu Suk Lee, M.D. Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea Abstract Nevoid melanoma is a very rare histological subtype of vertical growth phase melanoma. Histologically, it mimics benign nevus and thus may lead to an erroneous diagnosis. We report a case of nevoid melanoma arising in a 53-year-old American woman. High index of suspicion and evaluation of cytologic atypia with ancillary tests may help in establishing the diagnosis. Key Words : Melanoma, Skin Introduction melanoma [2]. Histologic diagnosis of melanoma depends on the combination features of poor Differentiation of benign and malignant circumscription, size, asymmetry, pagetoid spread, melanocytic lesion is a challenging issue both for lack of maturation, cytologic atypia and mitotic clinicians and pathologists. Among melanomas, figures [3]. desmoplastic melanoma, acral-lentiginous Nevoid melanoma is a very rare type of melanoma and nevoid melanoma are most melanoma with less than 1% of melanomas [4,5]. commonly misdiagnosed [1]. Especially with low-power microscopic Well-known clinical features for the diagnosis examination, misdiagnosis as benign nevus is of malignant melanoma include asymmetry, frequently rendered [6,7]. It resembles a nevus in irregular border, uneven color and size larger than that it shows symmetrical growth architecture, 6mm. These features are usually applied to variable maturation and no prominent plaques and patches of radial growth phase intraepidermal component. It manifests sharp Corresponding Author: Misun Choe, M.D., Department of Pathology, Keimyung University School of Medicine 1095 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 704-701, Korea Tel : +82-53-580-3815 E-mail : [email protected] Nevoid Melanoma in the Forearm 35 lateral circumscription.
    [Show full text]