DOCSLIB.ORG

Dunes Creek Watershed Management Plan Porter County, Indiana July 6, 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dunes Creek Watershed Management Plan Porter County, Indiana July 6, 2006 Dunes Creek Watershed Management Plan Porter County, Indiana July 6, 2006 Prepared by: Save the Dunes Conservation Fund 444 Barker Road Michigan City, IN 46360 Phone 219-879-3937 Fax 219-872-4875 www.savedunes.org Funding from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management was used to develop this plan. 7/11/2006 ii Executive Summary The Dunes Creek Watershed Management Plan serves as a framework for achieving the following vision: A healthy Dunes Creek watershed ecosystem that supports species diversity, protects Lake Michigan water quality, and improves the quality of life in Porter County, while maintaining the important social, economic, and recreational uses of the area. High levels of Escherichia coli (E. coli) in the waters of the creek and surrounding its confluence with Lake Michigan are the primary watershed impairments affecting quality of life in Porter County. The E. coli bacteria are used to indicate fecal contamination and the potential presence of other pathogens. Lake Michigan beaches are tested regularly to determine the levels of E. coli present. When the amount of E. coli exceeds the state standard, beaches must be closed to protect public health. Such closures, which occur regularly at the Indiana Dunes State Park, substantially limit resident and visitor recreation opportunities and adversely affect economic activity in Porter County. This plan addresses the elimination or reduction of the Dunes Creek E. coli water quality problem, which will reduce beach closures at the Indiana Dunes State Park and contribute to an improved quality of life for Porter County residents and visitors. The Dunes Creek Steering Committee includes representatives from the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Mittal (formerly International Steel Group), United States Geological Survey, Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and many other entities. The plan was developed by the Steering Committee with regular input from the public and support from Save the Dunes Conservation Fund’s watershed coordinator, Christine Livingston. This plan addresses nonpoint sources of pollution by documenting current water quality and biological integrity and making recommendations for improving water quality. In addition to covering pollution prevention and remediation, the recommendations include restoration activities. To reduce the identified stressors in the Dunes Creek watershed and address other concerns identified by the Steering Committee and stakeholders, the Steering Committee developed the following goals. Goal 1: Reduce nutrient and sediment by 20% by 2016. Goal 2: Reduce pathogen concentrations to meet the state standard by 2016. Goal 3: Improve stakeholder and public involvement. Goal 4: Improve biotic communities by 2016 so that they are partially supporting. Goal 5: Reduce TDS and chloride concentrations to meet Indiana State Standard. Copies of the Dunes Creek Watershed Management Plan were provided to the distribution list (Appendix A). If you would like a copy of the plan it can be downloaded from www.savedunes.org. For additional information, contact Save the Dunes Conservation Fund at 219-879-3564, [email protected], 444 Barker Road, Michigan City, IN 46360. 7/11/2006 iii Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................................................................ ii Table of Contents................................................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Watershed Partnerships.................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Public Participation.......................................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Physical Description of the Watershed ............................................................................................................ 3 2.0.1 Watershed Location .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.0.2 Natural History...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0.3 Endangered Species.............................................................................................................................. 6 2.0.4 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................................................. 7 2.0.5 Topography........................................................................................................................................... 8 2.0.6 Hydrology.............................................................................................................................................. 9 2.0.7 Ecoregions........................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Land Use Description of the Watershed ....................................................................................................... 12 2.1.1 Cultural/Recreational Resources ........................................................................................................ 12 2.1.2 Land Ownership.................................................................................................................................. 13 3.0 Water Quality and Data Collection ................................................................................................................ 15 4.1 Pathogens........................................................................................................................................................ 34 4.1.1 Failing Septic Systems........................................................................................................................ 34 4.1.2 Agricultural Livestock Runoff ............................................................................................................ 35 4.1.3 Wildlife................................................................................................................................................ 35 4.2 Siltation........................................................................................................................................................... 36 4.3 Salinity/TSS/Chlorides................................................................................................................................... 38 4.4 Nutrients......................................................................................................................................................... 38 4.5 Flow and Habitat Alteration........................................................................................................................... 39 4.6 Causes Unknown............................................................................................................................................ 39 5.0 Goals, Objectives, and Implementation Priorities ......................................................................................... 41 6.0 Management Measures and Resources.......................................................................................................... 48 7.0 Existing/On-going Activities.......................................................................................................................... 63 8.0 Measuring Progress and Plan Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 66 9.0 Future Considerations .................................................................................................................................... 69 10.0 Implementation............................................................................................................................................. 70 Appendix A Watershed Plan Distribution List and Steering Committee Members............................................ 72 Appendix B Outreach Brochure........................................................................................................................... 76 Appendix C Press Releases.................................................................................................................................. 78 Appendix D Mittal Steel ...................................................................................................................................... 86 Appendix E Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Species .................................................................................... 87 Appendix F Dunes Creek Ecoregion ................................................................................................................... 92 Appendix G Quality Assurance Project Plan....................................................................................................... 93 Appendix H Water Quality Parameters and Discussion by Stream Reach ......................................................... 94 Loading......................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mayflies, Stoneflies, and Caddisflies of Streams and Marshes of Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, USA
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 556: 43–63Mayflies, (2016) stoneflies, and caddisflies of streams and marshes of Indiana Dunes... 43 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.556.6725 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies of streams and marshes of Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, USA R. Edward DeWalt1, Eric J. South2 , Desiree R. Robertson3, Joy E. Marburger4, Wendy W. Smith4, Victoria Brinson5 1 University of Illinois, Prairie Research Institute, Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 S Oak St., Cham- paign, IL 61820 2 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Entomology, 320 Morrill Hall, 505 S. Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 3 Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605 4 Great Lakes Research and Education Center, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, 1100 N. Mineral Springs Road, Porter, Indiana 46304 5 1545 Senator Lane, Ford heights, Illinois 60411 Corresponding author: R. Edward DeWalt ([email protected]) Academic editor: R. Holzenthal | Received 30 September 2015 | Accepted 16 December 2015 | Published 21 January 2016 http://zoobank.org/442510FA-C734-4A6B-9D5C-BDA917C1D5F6 Citation: DeWalt RE, South EJ, Robertson DR, Marburger JE, Smith WW, Brinson V (2016) Mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies of streams and marshes of Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, USA. ZooKeys 556: 43–63.doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.556.6725 Abstract United States National Parks have protected natural communities for one hundred years. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore (INDU) is a park unit along the southern boundary of Lake Michigan in Indiana, USA. An inventory of 19 sites, consisting of a seep, 12 streams, four marshes, a bog, and a fen were ex- amined for mayflies (Ephemeroptera), stoneflies (Plecoptera), and caddisflies (Trichoptera) (EPT taxa).
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Adventures
    1 M18 Alyea Park 2 M18 Ambler Flatwoods Nature Preserve 3 M18 American Discovery Trail 4 M18 Aukiki Wetland Conservation Area 5 M18 Bailly Homestead and Chellberg Farm 6 M18 Barker Woods 7 M18 Beverly Shores Area OUTDOOR ADVENTURES MAP 8 M18 Bicentennial Park 9 M18 Bluhm County Park 10 M18 Brincka-Cross Gardens 11 M18 Broken Wagon Bison 12 M18 Brookdale Park 13 M18 C&O Greenway 14 M18 Calumet Bike Trail 15 M18 Calumet Park 16 M18 Campbell Street Access 17 M18 Central Avenue Beach 18 M18 Central Park Plaza 19 M18 Chustak Public Fishing Area 20 M18 Coffee Creek Park A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y 21 M18 Coffee Creek Watershed Preserve 22 M18 Countryside Park and Alton Goin Museum 1 1 23 M18 Cowles Bog Trail 24 M18 Creek Ridge County Park 95 New Buffalo 25 M18 Creekside Park 2 2 26 M18 Cressmoor Prairie Nature Preserve 27 M18 239 94 Dale B. Engquist Nature Preserve 12 28 M18 Deep River County Park US BIKE ROUTE #36 3 Wilson Rd 3 29 M18 Deep River Water Trail Michiana MICHIGAN 30 M18 Deer Trail Park Michiana 77 W 10 E 1000 N ShShooresres 00 N INDIANA 31 M18 Drazer Park (Thomas S. Drazer Memorial Park) E 0 0 5 Long 94 4 N 32 M18 Dunbar Beach 4 E 900 N 77 Beach 12 US BIKE ROUTE #36 33 M18 Dune Park Station 128 44 2 Tryon Rd 39 92 d W 800 N Saugany 15 R 34 E k M18 Dune Succession Trail Lake c E i 5 W Michigan 2 w 131 0 r Blvd 4 0 Hudson a 212 3 124 N K t Lake S N Meer Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indiana State Trails · Greenways & Bikeways Plan
    THE INDIANA STATE TRAILS · GREENWAYS & BIKEWAYS PLAN STATE OF INDIANA Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR Governor State House, Second Floor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Dear Trail Enthusiasts: With great excitement, I welcome you to travel the path down our state’s latest comprehensive trails plan. Not since our state park system was created has the state undertaken an outdoor initiative of this potential scope. This initiative will soon begin uniting our state’s disconnected routes and place every Hoosier within 15 minutes of a trail. The whole will be much greater than the sum of its parts and will benefit Hoosiers from all walks of life. We doubled state funding from $10 million to $20 million annually to take advan- tage of this unique network of opportunities, and at first glance this is a recreation initiative, but we intend it to be much more. Our trails plan will encourage healthy habits in Hoosiers, boost tourism and enhance Indiana’s ability to attract new investment and jobs. Our trail investments can deliver. As Hoosiers enjoy our new trails, they will be hiking, walking, and rid- ing over miles of new high-speed telecommunications and utility conduits. Access to outdoor recreation also ranks among the features potential companies seek for their employees when locating a business. Real success will require the help of local communities, businesses, and private philanthropies. Let’s join together as we create something that will be the envy of the nation! Sincerely, Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. HOOSIERS ON THE MOVE THE
    [Show full text]
  • Bikes on Trains Program
    Trails Ride your bike along Lakeshore Bike Drive in Chicago, explore the trails the South Shore Line along the Indiana Dunes National Park and experience vibrant APRIL 1, 2019 - OCTOBER 31, 2019* Your bike can ride, too! downtown South Bend. Bicycling enthusiasts can take their bikes on the South Shore Line from Chicago to South Bend! South Bend Hammond Bike racks, located in specified train cars, are Airport Erie Lackawanna Trail provided free of charge on a first-come, East Bank Trail Monon Trail first-served basis. Northside Trail Wolf Lake Trail Riverside Trail West Bank Walkway Hegewisch Look for the Symbol Big Marsh Park Dune Park Bike rack-equipped train cars are clearly marked Calumet Trail 57th Street with a bike symbol prominently located on the Dunes Kankakee Trail McCormick Place windows of each car. Cyclists are asked to enter Museum Campus and exit the bike train cars through the center East Chicago Van Buren Millennium doors. Upon boarding, bikes are to be placed in the Bloomingdale Trail Lake George Trail Lakefront Trail self-locking racks. For more information on trails visit: South Shore Indiana Dunes LaPorte County Visit South Bend Convention & Tourism Convention & Mishawaka Visitors Authority Visitors Bureau mysouthshoreline.com For safety reasons, bicycles may only board Millennium or disembark at designated stations. Van Buren Street Now you can Museum Campus McCormick Place Bicycle Platform 57th Street Bicycles Not Permitted 63rd Street ES UN K A D AR DIAN L P IN ION A NAT Bike Hegewisch Lake Hudson 11th Street (M. City)11th Dune Park Hammond Miller South Bend Airport Beverly Shores Beverly Carroll Avenue (M.
    [Show full text]
  • Dunes Kankakee Trail Study
    k k ar ar P l P gs oo e rin ch agu Sp S e n ry L ia ta tle d n rk Lit In e Pa k k, m e ar ol ar Ele n P ho P t or te c e os th a y S ak Y w St ar t L on Ha nt at wt e Pr e m N Ele itt m m 70 ru t 1 B Prairie Duneland/Calumet Trail Connector os n{ P gion Le n ica er Am k ar l P ia nn te en s C a rk k om Pa ar Th P kom on rk s ks l Pa a k c oo k . W ar Ja h e t L P Sc re . er s le C .A rle d k ee .C Rob ha id ar f .M C M Pn{ Cof Y ke on on nd La rt rt la ste ste ne he e u Chesterton Town Boundary C Ch D il Tra d n{ lan Libraries (ISL) ne Du ie air l r . P t oo S h Recreational Facilities (IDNR) Sc d ry r ta 3 en 2 lem Restaurants (MarketMaker) g E ailly n o l B h a p e K Jos n o Hospitals (HAZUS) i t o e c t l lp e oo a n h u o Sc V R 5 te n Schools (HAZUS) o o n ia t c d e a i m h d r e t d i t n r r In õ e ou a l te Farmers Market (Porter Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Porter County, Indiana
    PORTER COUNTY, INDIANA AND UNINCORPORATED Porter County AREAS COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER BEVERLY SHORES, TOWN OF 185173 BURNS HARBOR, TOWN OF 180207 CHESTERTON, TOWN OF 180201 DUNE ACRES, TOWN OF 180205 HEBRON, TOWN OF 180387 *KOUTS, TOWN OF 180335 OGDEN DUNES, TOWN OF 180206 PINES, TOWN OF 180388 PORTAGE, CITY OF 180202 PORTER COUNTY 180425 (Unincorporated Areas) PORTER, TOWN OF 180208 VALPARAISO, CITY OF 180204 *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified EFFECTIVE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 18127CV000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map
    [Show full text]
  • Sources and Ecology of E. Coli in the North Shore Channel and North Branch of the Chicago River
    Sources and Ecology of E. coli in the North Shore Channel and North Branch of the Chicago River Murulee Byappanahalli and Richard Whitman U.S. Geological Survey Porter, Indiana U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Great Lakes Science Center, Lake Michigan Ecological Research Station (LMERS) Microbial Research at LMERS Recreational Water Quality Ecology of fecal indicator bacteria Predictive modeling Microbial source tracking Sources of FIB Determine the Relative Risk to Swimming-Related Illnesses Source Relative risk Human feces/sewage High Non-human (e.g., animal feces) Moderate Environmental (e.g., plants, soil, sand) Low (unknown?) Examples of Human Pathogens Potentially Present in Raw Domestic Wastewater Organism Disease Symptoms Bacteria E. coli (enteropathogenic) Gastroenteritis Diarrhea Salmonella typhi Typhoid fever High fever, diarrhea Other Salmonella spp. Salmonellosis Food poisoning Vibrio cholerae Cholera Severe diarrhea and dehydration Protozoa Cryptosporidium Cryptosporidiosis Diarrhea Entamoeba histolytica Amebiasis Prolonged diarrhea Giardia lamblia Giardiasis Mild to severe diarrhea Viruses Adenovirus Respiratory disease Diarrhea, vomiting Enteroviruses Gastroenteritis Norwalk agent Gastroenteritis Rotavirus Gastroenteritis FIB Sources: Animals and the Environment Animals Environment (Moderate Risk) (Risk???) E. coli O157:H7 Beach sand Salmonella Soil/sediment Campylobacter Plants (e.g., Cladophora) Cryptosporidium Development of Recreational Water Quality Standards: Fecal Indicator Bacterial Concept 1900-1970: Total coliform Coliform bacteria bacteria (50-2400 colony- Fecal coliform bacteria forming units, CFU/100 mL) 1972-1986: Fecal coliforms E. coli (200 CFU/100 mL) Epidemiological and Pathogenic E. coli water quality studies were conducted 1986-Present: E. coli or enterococci (freshwater); enterococci (marine water) Primary Body Contact (e.g., New Epidemiological and swimming) water quality studies: 2003- 2007 126 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore: Transportation System Existing
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Portage, IN Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Transportation System Existing Conditions The Pavilion at Portage Lakefront and Riverwalk Source: Volpe Center photograph (July 2015) Agreement No. P15PG00222 May 20, 2016 Table of Contents Report notes ......................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgments ................................................................................................ iii Definitions ............................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ...............................................................................................1 Transportation System Context ............................................................................2 Park Background ............................................................................................................. 2 Geographic Context ......................................................................................................... 4 Regional Transportation Planning Context .........................................................8 Existing Conditions by Mode .............................................................................. 11 Motor Vehicle ................................................................................................................ 11 Shuttle .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Dunes Ecosystem Alliance Framework
    Indiana Dunes Ecosystem Alliance Strategic Framework Written by Save the Dunes Conservation Fund In partnership with the National Park Service – Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, United States Geological Survey, The Nature Conservancy, Shirley Heinze Land Trust, National Parks Conservation Association, and the Northern Indiana Public Service Company. This project was made possible by a grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Lake Michigan Coastal Program. 0 Introduction The Indiana dunes are situated in Northwest Indiana along the southern shore of Lake Michigan. Despite their name, the Indiana dunes are not limited to the shoreline and are home to a diverse range of habitats. The Indiana dunes are primarily comprised of the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore (INDU), managed by the National Park Service (NPS); Indiana Dunes State Park (IDSP), managed by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR); and lands owned and managed by non-profit organizations such as Shirley Heinze Land Trust (SHLT) as well as municipalities and communities. The Indiana dunes are embedded within and intersected by a variety of land uses, such as industry, agriculture, residential communities, and utilities. Within this complicated landscape is one of the nation’s top ten most biodiverse national parks in the National Park System. The Indiana dunes are home to nearly 1,200 native plant species1, globally imperiled habitats, and state and federally endangered plant and wildlife, all within steps to a number of densely populated communities in Northwest Indiana. The urbanized and industrial setting of the Indiana dunes contributes to the prosperity, diversity, and quality of life in Northwest Indiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Landowners Receive More Than $7.0 Million to Conserve Imperiled Species Through the Fiscal Year 2004 Private Stewardship Grant Program
    LANDOWNERS RECEIVE MORE THAN $7.0 MILLION TO CONSERVE IMPERILED SPECIES THROUGH THE FISCAL YEAR 2004 PRIVATE STEWARDSHIP GRANT PROGRAM Contacts Patricia Fisher (202) 208-5634 Interior Secretary Gale Norton announced that private landowners and groups in 39 states are receiving more than $7 million to undertake conservation projects on their land for endangered, threatened and other at-risk species thanks to the Administration’s innovative cost-share Private Stewardship Grants program. Administered by the Department’s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, each of the 97 grants awarded today require at least a 10 percent match in non-federal dollars or in-kind contributions. The new grants will benefit species ranging from the bog turtle in the eastern United States to the O’ahu ’elepaio, an endangered forest bird in Hawaii. “President Bush has made working in voluntary partnership with states, local communities, tribes, private landowners and others the gold standard for our conservation efforts,” Norton said. “The grants we are announcing today meet that standard by empowering private citizens to do what the federal government cannot do alone – conserve habitat for imperiled species on private lands.” The Private Stewardship Grants Program provides federal grants on a competitive basis to individuals and groups engaged in voluntary conservation efforts on private lands that benefit federally listed endangered or threatened species, candidate species or other at- risk species. Under this program, private landowners as well as groups working with private landowners are able to submit proposals directly to the Service for funding to support these efforts. President Bush has requested funding of $10 million for this program in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archeological Overview and Assessment of Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Indiana
    An Archeological Overview and Assessment of Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Indiana By Dawn Bringelson and Jay T. Sturdevant Midwest Archeological Center Technical Report No. 97 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Midwest Archeological Center This report has been reviewed against the criteria contained in 43CFR Part 7, Subpart A, Section 7.18 (a) (1) and, upon recommendation of the Midwest Regional Office and the Midwest Archeological Center, has been classified as Available Making the report available meets the criteria of 43CFR Part 7, Subpart A, Section 7.18 (a) (1). AN ARCHEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF INDIANA DUNES NaTIONAL LaKESHORE, INDIANA By Dawn Bringelson and Jay T. Sturdevant Midwest Archeological Center Technical Report No. 97 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Midwest Archeological Center United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Midwest Archeological Center Lincoln, Nebraska 2007 INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE ABSTRACT The Indana Dunes area along the southern Lake Mchgan shore holds a unque and unsurpassed set of natural resources. The exceptonal nature of ths area’s topography and resultng bologcal dversty attracted the attenton of scentfc and conservaton communtes by the turn of the 20th century. Ths apprecaton, coupled wth severe and ongong impact by industry to the southern Lake Mchgan dunes, sparked actvsm that ultmately contrbuted to the formaton of Indana Dunes Natonal Lakeshore (INDU) at the end of the 1960s. Today, INDU contans most of the last remanng intact duneland of the larger area. Archeologcal investgatons of the dunes area, startng wth avocatonal observatons some 100 years ago, have intensfed over recent decades as a result of park actvtes and research.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Wooden Ships and Iron Men Bbyy Wwilliamilliam Hhalliaralliar Stroll Along the Shores of Lake Michigan on Is a Saga That Spans Many Lifetimes
    THE TM 911 Franklin Street Weekly Newspaper Michigan City, IN 46360 Volume 33, Number 26 Thursday, July 6, 2017 Of Wooden Ships and Iron Men bbyy WWilliamilliam HHalliaralliar stroll along the shores of Lake Michigan on is a saga that spans many lifetimes. It includes feats a summer’s evening can conjure so many of engineering, stories of daring rescue in the surf, delightful thoughts and memories. Take a of political wrangling and compromise between in- walk along the lake in Washington Park dustry and nature, and an ever-changing landscape Aand consider what a visage the fabled body of water shaped by the wind, waves and westward rotation would present if viewed over the debris of a dump- of the lake’s waters as the earth spins on its axis. ing ground. Michigan City’s rich history has been recorded That might very well have been the fate of our over the years by the many who lived here, raised shores had it not been for the foresight of a man families and loved their city. You can tell a city is of the sea who came from his own country across well-loved by the number of those who have record- the ocean, landed in Michigan City and eventually ed its colorful stories. called our lakefront home. This account is of a man, a crusty old salt who The story of Michigan City’s lakefront and harbor Continued on Page 2 The Beacher’s Paul Kemiel captured this dynamite aerial image of Heisman Harbor. THE Page 2 July 6, 2017 THE 911 Franklin Street • Michigan City, IN 46360 219/879-0088 • FAX 219/879-8070 In Case Of Emergency, Dial e-mail: News/Articles - [email protected] email: Classifieds - [email protected] http://www.thebeacher.com/ PRINTED WITH Published and Printed by TM Trademark of American Soybean Association THE BEACHER BUSINESS PRINTERS Delivered weekly, free of charge to Birch Tree Farms, Duneland Beach, Grand Beach, Hidden 911 Shores, Long Beach, Michiana Shores, Michiana MI and Shoreland Hills.
    [Show full text]