Visitor Maps
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Final Point of Access Study
Prepared for: I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project Technical Memorandum No. 28 FINAL POINT OF ACCESS STUDY Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A Prepared by: Philadelphia, PA In association with: HNTB Corporation STV Inc. Gannett Fleming, Inc. A.D. Marble & Company Kise Straw & Kolodner, Inc. Riverfront Associates, Inc. November, 2012 1 2 Technical Memorandum No. 28 – Final Point of Access Study Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, INTRODUCTION AMD REQUIREMENTS ... 1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................ 1 Purpose of Access......................................................................... 1 Summary of Findings .................................................................... 2 II. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 7 Project Description .............................................................. 7 Study Area Description ........................................................ 7 Project Area Description .................................................... 10 Project Purpose and Need .................................................. 11 III. REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVAL OF ACCESS ..................................... 12 B. ENGINEERING STUDY ............................................................. 17 I. CURRENT CONDITIONS ........................................................... 17 Roadway Network -
Mayflies, Stoneflies, and Caddisflies of Streams and Marshes of Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, USA
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 556: 43–63Mayflies, (2016) stoneflies, and caddisflies of streams and marshes of Indiana Dunes... 43 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.556.6725 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies of streams and marshes of Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, USA R. Edward DeWalt1, Eric J. South2 , Desiree R. Robertson3, Joy E. Marburger4, Wendy W. Smith4, Victoria Brinson5 1 University of Illinois, Prairie Research Institute, Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 S Oak St., Cham- paign, IL 61820 2 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Entomology, 320 Morrill Hall, 505 S. Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 3 Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605 4 Great Lakes Research and Education Center, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, 1100 N. Mineral Springs Road, Porter, Indiana 46304 5 1545 Senator Lane, Ford heights, Illinois 60411 Corresponding author: R. Edward DeWalt ([email protected]) Academic editor: R. Holzenthal | Received 30 September 2015 | Accepted 16 December 2015 | Published 21 January 2016 http://zoobank.org/442510FA-C734-4A6B-9D5C-BDA917C1D5F6 Citation: DeWalt RE, South EJ, Robertson DR, Marburger JE, Smith WW, Brinson V (2016) Mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies of streams and marshes of Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, USA. ZooKeys 556: 43–63.doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.556.6725 Abstract United States National Parks have protected natural communities for one hundred years. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore (INDU) is a park unit along the southern boundary of Lake Michigan in Indiana, USA. An inventory of 19 sites, consisting of a seep, 12 streams, four marshes, a bog, and a fen were ex- amined for mayflies (Ephemeroptera), stoneflies (Plecoptera), and caddisflies (Trichoptera) (EPT taxa). -
Long Lake Aquatic Plant Survey (2013)
Long Lake Aquatic Vegetation Survey 2013 Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council Survey performed and report written by Kevin L. Cronk TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ........................................................................................................................ iii List of Figures ....................................................................................................................... iii SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 3 History ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Study Area ................................................................................................................................... 6 METHODS ........................................................................................................................... 11 Sampling .................................................................................................................................... 11 Community Mapping ................................................................................................................ 12 Data Processing -
OUTDOOR ADVENTURE SITES Michiana W 10 E 1000 N Shshoores 00 N INDIANA
OUTDOOR ADVENTURES MAP New Buffalo 239 94 12 Wilson Rd Michiana MICHIGAN OUTDOOR ADVENTURE SITES Michiana W 10 E 1000 N ShShoores 00 N INDIANA E 0 0 5 94 Dunes RegionN Long E 900 N Beach 12 30 31 Tryon Rd 32 39 d W 800 N 1 Indiana DunesSaugan yVisitor Center R n E k Lake c E i 5 Michiga W 2 w lvd 0 Michigan r B 4 0 Hudson a 212 3 N K 2 t o Hammond Lakefront ParkLake and Bird Sanctuary S N Meer Rd. th City S Chicago 29 4 t Warnke Rd hicag W S C 35 d 90 R E M 3 e C ic Whiting Parkt and Whihala Beach Park hig e a a n i Lake n B t lvd i t Greenwoo Ave J r d v a o 80 2 o r l D A h 20 rly d E Coolspring n N e v s E 600 N R t v e t 4 e rl o Gibson Woods S B a S n Silver I Ave Trail n E n Michigan k d R 26 i l Lake i c a r d k n t D Town of o n Creek a ro n Beverly c 20 p a F h o 3 r l Indiana k e c t F 5 e i a i s L y Pines Lake Etta County Park v 20 Harbor a B Shores H A l v w t d d d t e a n S R o a m Whiting g r hi k Wolf u ic l B r 6 M a a Miller Woods Lake C 20 P 27 12 421 E 2 35 e t 0 Finger a 0 t Rolling 12 5 Lake S 20 W Kieffer Rd W 400 N N 7 90 E MarquettePrairie Park 29th St 20 1 W S Hunt dD y 34 chu R ltz Lake ic 19 Hw 28 Rd y s d W 912 le ke e E ess R i d n Furn R y Du J 8 d o R R West Beach and Dune Succession Trail d h R n y l s r Dune s on e g R v n 25 i d d a r 18 p Acres R E W e 9 East S W 200 N/Snyder Rd Tolleston Dunes Trail v 0 r l N A 94 0 a D 20 2 r 6 E 1400 N d 6 e l t Colum e 141st S bus Dr n Clear 0 v N e n 1o 1 i Chicago i 0 f A s Lake f 0 l W 20 N M E 200 N E e d e i 10 ounty Line l d h Portage Lakefront and Riverwalk -
Grand Region Summary
2014 Congestion & Mobility Report Chapter 3 GRAND REGION SUMMARY Performance Measures Definitions ......................... 4 Regional User Delay Cost Per Mile ........................... 6 Regional Congestion Hours ......................................... 7 Ranked UDC by Location ............................................... 9 Mobility Measures: I-96 Corridor ............................10 Mobility Measures: I-196 Corridor ........................ 21 Mobility Measures: M-6 Corridor .......................... 30 Mobility Measures: US-31 Corridor ...................... 37 Mobility Measures: US-131 Corridor.................... 42 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures Chapter 3 Performance Measures Definitions Delay No Delay Delay POSTED SPEED 60 MPH* ACTUAL SPEED Total delay > Delay is calculated by taking the difference between actual speeds when they fall below 60 mph and the posted speed limit for freeways posted at 70 mph. ThisPOSTED is to SP takeEED out the delay caused Delay No Delay Delay by the lower average speeds from commercial vehicles.Recurring POSTED SPEED 60 MPH Recurring Total delay per mile > Delay per mile is calculated by taking the total60 delay MPH and dividing it by the length of the freeway. This was performed for each route in each county. AVERAGE SPEED Non-recurring Non-recurring/recurring delay > Non-recurring delay is calculated ACTUALby taking SPEED the difference between the actual speed (any time the speed falls below 60 mph) andACTUAL the average SPEED speed. Recurring is measured -
Longer Combination Vehicles on Exclusive Truck Lanes: Interstate 90 Corridor Case Study
Longer Combination Vehicles on Exclusive Truck Lanes: Interstate 90 Corridor Case Study final report prepared for Federal Highway Administration September 2009 final report Longer Combination Vehicles on Exclusive Truck Lanes: Interstate 90 Corridor Case Study prepared for Federal Highway Administration date September 2009 Longer Combination Vehicles on Exclusive Truck Lanes: Interstate 90 Corridor Case Study Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Study Overview .......................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Research Approach ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Analytical Framework ............................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Data Collection and Testing ...................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Outreach ....................................................................................................... 2-2 3.0 Facility Characteristics ....................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Highway Physical Characteristics ............................................................ 3-1 3.2 Highway Operations .................................................................................. 3-3 3.3 Capital Improvement Costs ..................................................................... -
Plan ID.Indd
Contents Introduction . .1 Resource Overview . 2 Natural History . 2 Cultural History . 3 Existing Conditions . .5 Audiences . 5 Facilities . 6 Staff . 7 Programs . 7 Media . 9 Partnerships . .10 Regional Offerings . .12 Interpretive Themes . .13 Recommendations . .14 Interpretive Center . 14 Pavilion . 17 Self-Guided Media . 18 Programs . 19 Staff . .20 Other Locations . 20 Summary . 22 Introduction In response to a need to stay current with interpretive and visitor trends and to maximize limited staff and fi nan- cial resources, the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of State Parks and Reservoirs has devel- oped this Interpretive Master Plan for Indiana Dunes State Park. The plan accomplishes this task by: a. focusing interpretive efforts on a site-specifi c theme b. identifying needs for guided and self-guided interpretation, and c. recommending actions to fi ll those needs. The process of developing interpretive recommendations considers three components: a. Resource. What are the natural and cultural resources of the site.? b. Visitor. Who are the current users? What are the untapped audiences? c. Agency. What is the mission of the agency? What are the management goals within the agency? Other regional interpretive experiences and partnerships are incorporated to stretch staff and fi nances, foster cooperation and prevent competition. Several factors make the plan important for Indiana Dunes State Park: • In 2016, Indiana State Parks will be celebrating its 100th birthday. • The Indiana Dunes Nature Center opened int 1990. Most of the exhibits have been unchanged and are showing their age. • Indiana Dunes is unique from other parks. Recommendations need to refl ect: 1. Most of the park’s visitors are day use only. -
City Prepares for Second Shot at Income Tax Residents to Be Asked
After year of austerity $ g; & 1 City prepares for second shot at income tax •A and pursve what they termed an austerity program. ' tention but continued failure to sweep streets and clean Early this year Mayor Robert Wood commented After over one year of operating on an austerity that he feels the city lost $400,000 in revenue during budget program, St. Johns city commissioners this Among the major services cut back were main catch basins could ultimately cost the city excessive tenance of streets and sidewalks in the areas of sweep amounts. the last two years because of two charter revision de irfonth will loft a trial balloon in efforts to test the nials by residents and the inability of the water fund to winds of public opinion. ing and snow removal, numerous administrative cur Since defeat of the two financial related proposals y- tailments, adjusted hours for refuse facilities and rec in early 1968, the city has on two occasions borrowed repay loans extended from the general fund. The trial will come in the form of a civic ad reational program cutbacks. Since adopting the tight a total of 155,000. The current loan of approximately The charter amendment defeats forced the city to visory vote Tuesday July 15 questioning residents on ened budget plan some conditions within the city have $65,000 was granted with a warning from the Michigan reduce its 16-mill levy of three years ago to 10-mills. 'their feelings toward a city income tax. The leveling deteriorated markedly while others have received Municipal Finance Commission that unless the local of such a tax has been kicked around by proponents and funds and attention to remain fairly stable. -
Allston I-90 Multimodal Update Presented to the Board on 06/22/2020
I-90 ALLSTON INTERCHANGE A MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECT MASSDOT/FMCB JOINT MEETING JUNE 22, 2020 MASSDOT/FMCB JOINT MEETING – 6/22/20 Today’s Agenda • Overview: Where Does the Project Stand? • What “Throat” Alternatives Will Be Evaluated? • How Will The Choice Be Made Among The Build Alternatives? • How Do Alternatives Preliminarily Compare? • What Happens Next? MASSDOT/FMCB JOINT MEETING – 6/22/20 2 Purpose and Need of Allston Multimodal Project MASSDOT/FMCB JOINT MEETING – 6/22/20 3 How Current Infrastructure Carries Travel to Boston from the West (measured as Average Daily Travel or ADT) • Serves as main interstate route into Boston from the Interstate 90: west • Key freight link from Conley terminal to rail ~150,000 ADT intermodal facility • Considerations for future congestion management • 4 lanes required in each direction Soldiers Field Road: • Currently serves as major commuting route from west and northwest origin points ~75,000 ADT • If traffic can be reduced sufficiently in future, roadway could be redesigned as a true parkway • Potential for more ridership in medium term Worcester/Framingham (better station access, triple track project under study by MBTA) Commuter Rail: • Potential for new service model with higher ridership under consideration in Commuter ~18,000 ADT Rail vision but MBTA is 18 months away from having a new rail operating model MASSDOT/FMCB JOINT MEETING – 6/22/20 4 Why is the “throat” so difficult? • In the narrowest section of the “throat” there are 204 feet of available space between Boston University’s -
Porter County, Indiana
PORTER COUNTY, INDIANA AND UNINCORPORATED Porter County AREAS COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER BEVERLY SHORES, TOWN OF 185173 BURNS HARBOR, TOWN OF 180207 CHESTERTON, TOWN OF 180201 DUNE ACRES, TOWN OF 180205 HEBRON, TOWN OF 180387 *KOUTS, TOWN OF 180335 OGDEN DUNES, TOWN OF 180206 PINES, TOWN OF 180388 PORTAGE, CITY OF 180202 PORTER COUNTY 180425 (Unincorporated Areas) PORTER, TOWN OF 180208 VALPARAISO, CITY OF 180204 *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified EFFECTIVE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 18127CV000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map -
Sources and Ecology of E. Coli in the North Shore Channel and North Branch of the Chicago River
Sources and Ecology of E. coli in the North Shore Channel and North Branch of the Chicago River Murulee Byappanahalli and Richard Whitman U.S. Geological Survey Porter, Indiana U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Great Lakes Science Center, Lake Michigan Ecological Research Station (LMERS) Microbial Research at LMERS Recreational Water Quality Ecology of fecal indicator bacteria Predictive modeling Microbial source tracking Sources of FIB Determine the Relative Risk to Swimming-Related Illnesses Source Relative risk Human feces/sewage High Non-human (e.g., animal feces) Moderate Environmental (e.g., plants, soil, sand) Low (unknown?) Examples of Human Pathogens Potentially Present in Raw Domestic Wastewater Organism Disease Symptoms Bacteria E. coli (enteropathogenic) Gastroenteritis Diarrhea Salmonella typhi Typhoid fever High fever, diarrhea Other Salmonella spp. Salmonellosis Food poisoning Vibrio cholerae Cholera Severe diarrhea and dehydration Protozoa Cryptosporidium Cryptosporidiosis Diarrhea Entamoeba histolytica Amebiasis Prolonged diarrhea Giardia lamblia Giardiasis Mild to severe diarrhea Viruses Adenovirus Respiratory disease Diarrhea, vomiting Enteroviruses Gastroenteritis Norwalk agent Gastroenteritis Rotavirus Gastroenteritis FIB Sources: Animals and the Environment Animals Environment (Moderate Risk) (Risk???) E. coli O157:H7 Beach sand Salmonella Soil/sediment Campylobacter Plants (e.g., Cladophora) Cryptosporidium Development of Recreational Water Quality Standards: Fecal Indicator Bacterial Concept 1900-1970: Total coliform Coliform bacteria bacteria (50-2400 colony- Fecal coliform bacteria forming units, CFU/100 mL) 1972-1986: Fecal coliforms E. coli (200 CFU/100 mL) Epidemiological and Pathogenic E. coli water quality studies were conducted 1986-Present: E. coli or enterococci (freshwater); enterococci (marine water) Primary Body Contact (e.g., New Epidemiological and swimming) water quality studies: 2003- 2007 126 E. -
092811Portfolioforpdf:Layout 1
Current Portfolio >> 1111 Long Lake Centerpoint - Burger King 1111 W. Long Lake Road 2200 Opdyke Road Troy, MI 48098 Pontiac, MI 48341 Office - 3 Story Retail - 1 Story 1401 Crooks Centerpoint - Dunkin' Donuts 1401 Crooks Road and Baskin Robbins Troy, MI 48084 600 S. Opdyke Road Office - 1 Story Pontiac, MI 48341 Retail - 1 Story 2500 Centerpoint 2500 Centerpoint Parkway Centerpoint - Marathon Pontiac, MI 48341 1500 Opdyke Road Office - 1 Story Pontiac, MI 48341 Retail - 1 Story 975 Opdyke 975 Opdyke Road Centerpoint - Mi Zarape Auburn Hills, MI 48326 3800 Centerpoint Parkway Office - 1 Story Pontiac, MI 48341 Retail - 1 Story Auburn Ridge 3850 Hamlin Road Centerpoint - Papa Vino's Auburn Hills, MI 48326 3900 Centerpoint Parkway Office - 1 Story Pontiac, MI 48341 Retail - 1 Story Brookfield Office Park - Building One Centerpoint - Wendy's 31500 Northwestern Highway and Tim Horton's Farmington Hills, MI 48334 1600 Opdyke Road Office - 3 Story Pontiac, MI 48341 Retail - 1 Story Brookfield Office Park - Building Three Centerpoint Business Center 31700 Middlebelt Road 777 Enterprise Drive Farmington Hills, MI 48334 Pontiac, MI 48341 Office - 2 Story Office - 1 Story Centerpoint - Arby's Centerpoint Marketplace 800 Opdyke Road 3999 Centerpoint Parkway Pontiac, MI 48341 Pontiac, MI 48341 Retail - 1 Story Retail - 1 Story ETKIN HEADQUARTERS: 200 Franklin Center • 29100 Northwestern Hwy. • Southfield, Michigan 48034 • Telephone: 248-358-0800 • FAX: 248-358-2180 • etkinllc.com Current Portfolio >> Children’s Hospital of Michigan College Park -