DOCSLIB.ORG

Discussion on the Timing and Kinematics of Cadomian Deformation (Northern Brittany)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Journal of the Geological Society, London, Vol. 149, 1992, pp. 151-155. Printed in Northern Ireland Discussion on the timing and kinematics of Cadomian deformation (Northern Brittany) Journal, Vol. 147, 1989, pp. 423426 Special Publication, No. 51, 1990, pp. 133-150 Special Publication, No. 51, 1990, pp. 151-168 Jean-Pierre Brun writes: Strachan et al. (1989), Strachan & comments (e.g. ‘The St Brieuc Thrust where it is exposed at the Roach (1990), Treloar & Strachan (1990) as well as Strachan Plage de Chateau Serein is a late subvertical fault of limited et al. (1990) givean interpretation of Cadomian deformation in displacement which displays none of the deformation features Northern Brittany in terms of a single event of strike-slip tec- to be expected if this were the synmetamorphic crustal scale tonics at 540 Ma andhave proposed a model of ‘terrane amal- structure inferred by Bale & Brun’; Strachan et al. 1990, p. 81). gamation’ which I find in strong contradiction with field and We are obviously aware of the distinction between brittle and geochronological data (Bale & Brun 1983, 1989; Brun & Bale ductile structures and have never maintained that Chateau 1990). Our analysis takes into account regional-scale evidence Serein (cf. location on fig. 1, Bale & Brun 1989) might be a (geological maps, strain patterns and geophysical data) and type-locality for observing the characteristics of the St Brieuc all available and reliable geochronological data. Our result- Thrust. It is located along what we consider to be a lateral ramp ing interpretation stresses that Cadomian deformation started and not the thrust itself. The ‘deformation features to be ex- around 590-580Ma ago, combining thrusting and sinistral pected’ have been described in detail by Bale & Brun (1989) wrenching shear zones, and ended at 540 Ma with the uplift of (maps of foliation and lineation, strain measurements, shear the St Malo migmatite. I would like to discuss three main criteria, texture goniometry analyses . .). Our analyses and points that, for clarity, are dealt with under the following interpretation can be summarized as follows. The St Brieuc headings. Thrust system has an arcuate shape(fig. l), joining the NW-SE- oriented front of the NE-SW-trending lateral ramp. The whole Deformation timing. Bale and myself consider that the Coet- thrust pile displays two major thrust slices. The lower one is mieux-Fort la Latte intrusion, dated at 593 Ma (Vidal et al. composed, from base to top, of coarse-grained amphibolites 1974), is synkinematic and provides an age estimate for early derived from gabbros and diorites (Yffmiac Formation), fine- Cadomian deformation in the St Brieuc area. A similar situ- grained amphibolites with strongly deformed pillow lavas ation is observed in Normandy, where the Coutance diorite (Lanvollon Formation) and metasediments (LeguC Forma- gives an age of 584Ma (Guerrot & Peucat 1990). Strachan & tion). Several serpentine pods occur along the basal contact. Roach (1990, p. 144) write: ‘We do notbelieve that parallelism The rocks are strongly deformed and display a SW- or WSW- of an igneous fabric with a regional cleavage can alone demon- trending stretching lineation. The upper thrustslice iscomposed strate synchroneity of intrusion and regional deformation’. of only two of the previous formations which correspond, from This pluton is strongly elongated with an aspect ratio of 1 :4 base to top, to fine-grained amphibolites with moderately de- for the visible part, and presents a well-defined L-S fabric that formed pillow lavas (Roselier formation, equivalent of Lan- developed in a sub-solidus state (‘magmatic’ s.1.) parallel to vollon) and metasediments (Binic Formation, equivalent of strongly deformed basic inclusions. The pluton and its internal Legue). The rocks in this upper thrust unit are moderately to fabric are both parallel to the regional structural grain. How weakly deformed and less metamorphosed than those of the can Strachan and his colleagues explain such a structural pat- lower slice. Stretching lineations trend SW or WSW. In the tern if not in terms of a synkinematic emplacement? Despite the whole pile,shear criteria indicate a top tothe SW or WSW sense obvious deformationof this pluton, the Rb-Srsystem shows no of shear and strain intensity increase towards the base. resetting towards a younger (c. 540Ma) age, and therefore it The basal units of the St Brieuc Thrust system are brought appears that early Cadomiandeformation occurred in the into contact with the Lamballe formation (pelites, pelitic range 590-580 Ma. This accordswith recent 40Ar/39Ardating of sandstones and black cherts) which are strongly migmatized in metamorphic and magmatic amphiboles that indicates ‘a main the GuingampBelle Isle en Terre area. The paragneisses, mig- regional tectonothermal event prior to c. 570 Ma’ (Brown et al. matites and associated leucogranites present unequivocal shear 1990~). criteria indicating a top to the SW or WSW sense of shear. To the SE, the St Malo migmatite belt is separated from the St Kinematics of deformation. Bale & Brun (1989) and Brun & Brieuc units by the St Cast sinistral shear zone which runs Bale (1990) describe the kinematics of Cadomian deformation parallel to the basal lateral ramp of the St Brieuc thrust sys- in terms of thrusting and wrenching (fig. 1). Strachan and col- tem. The migmatites (dated at 549 Ma; Peucat 1986) and para- leagues concentrate their criticism on thrusting and ignore our gneisses are first thrust toward the S-SSW and then strongly analysis of wrenching. Their criticisms range from puredenial sheared along the St Cast and Cancale sinistral shear zones. (e.g. ‘There is no field evidence to support the suggestion that Finally, it is important tonote that the contour geometry of the major crustal units were amalgamated by thrusting’, Strachan frontal and lateral ramps of the St Brieuc thrust system are & Roach 1990, p. 148) to fallacious citations and misleading well marked by strong magnetic and gravimetric anomalies, 151 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/jgs/article-pdf/149/1/151/4891848/gsjgs.149.1.0151.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 152 DISCUSSION and picked out by weakly dipping reflectors on the SWAT 10 I am very grateful to all my colleagues and students involved in the seismic line (Lefort & Bardy 1987; Brun & Bale 1990). study of the Cadomian of North Brittany: S. Aitomar, B. Auvray, P. My main criticisms of Strachan and colleagues are as Bale, M. Ballevre, P. Bardy, R. Charlot, J. J. Chauvel, J. Cogni, D. follows. Gapais, V. Genestier, P. Graviou, E. Hallot, C. Le Corre, J. P. Lefort, P. Maillet, H. Martin, J. J. Peucat, P. Vidal from the Rennes 1 Univer- (1) Their 540 Ma strike-slip shearzone interpretation sity and J. Chantraine, E. Egal, E. Le Goff, C. Guerrot and D. Rabu ignores regional-scale structures as they are displayed on geo- from the B.R.G.M. As a group and as individuals, all of them have logical and geophysical maps. These are first order structures contributed to some extent to the ideas that I defend here. Several of that must be considered in making a regional scale interpreta- them share my opinions and could have written a rathersimilar discus- tion. I would suggest that Strachan and his colleagues have sion. Thanks are dueto M. S. Carpenter for improvements of English spent little time mapping inland, leading them to write: ‘The style and to W. Gibbons for very constructive suggestions. poorly exposed Yffiniac metagabbros’ (Strachan et al. 1990, p. 72) or ‘Difficulties in accepting this model arise from the 10 December 1990 almost complete lack of inland exposures’ (Strachan & Roach 1990, p. 145). The 1/50.000 cooperative mapping programme undertaken by the B.R.G.M. and Rennes 1 University demon- R. A. Strachan, M. Brown, R. S. D’Lemos, R. A. Roach & P. J. strates that,even in this areaof poor exposure, it is possible to Treloar reply: The Short Paper of Strachan et al. (1989) sum- find enough outcrops to make precise maps. marizes the work of Strachan & Roach (1990), Treloar & (2) On the coastal maps of Strachan & Roach (1990) and Strachan (1990) and Brown et al. (1990a). We interpret the Treloar & Strachan (1990), only ENE-WSW-trending and Cadomian belt of the North Armorican Massif as a collage of shallow-plunging stretching lineations are portrayed. There is variably displaced terranes produced by the amalgamation at no trace of NNE-SSW-trending lineations. One exception c. 540Ma of Cadomian continental arcs and marginal basin exists for a single area on fig. of Treloar & Strachan (1990). 4 complexes by sinistral transpression along a continental mar- But this single recognized thrust is interpreted as due to mig- gin above a subduction zone. This model contrasts with that of matite diapirism during strike-slip shearing. Evidence for SW- Bale & Brun (1983,1989) and Brun & Bale (1990)who propose trending lineationshas been known for a long time (Brun 1977 that thrusting at c. 590-580 Ma resulted in the obduction of a in the St Malo migmatite belt; Bale & Brun 1983 for the St ‘back-arc basin’ (Baie de St Brieuc) southwestwards over a Brieuc thrust system). ‘continental margin’ (St Malo-Mancellia). The resultant (3) Strachan et al., whilst failing to recognize the importance crustal thickening is thought by them to have led to partial of thrust-related structures, emphasize the presence of steep melting of Brioverian rocks at depth and tothe formation of the sinistral strike-slip zones. They fail, however, to give fair St Malo migmatites and the Mancellian granites (cf. also recognition to the fact that these strike-slip structures have Graviou & Auvray 1985; Graviou et al. 1988). We thank Brun been known for some time (e.g. Brun 1979, 1981; Bale& Brun for his discussion of our papers and model, and welcome the 1989; Brun & Bale 1990; Aitomar 1982; Bale 1986).
Recommended publications
  • World Map Showing Surface and Subsurface Distribution, and Lithologic Character of Middle and Late Neoproterozoic Rocks

    World Map Showing Surface and Subsurface Distribution, and Lithologic Character of Middle and Late Neoproterozoic Rocks

    World Map Showing Surface and Subsurface Distribution, and Lithologic Character of Middle and Late Neoproterozoic Rocks By John H. Stewart1 Open-File Report 2007-1087 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 1 Menlo Park, Calif. U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2007 Revised and reprinted: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Stewart, John H., 2007, World map showing surface and subsurface distribution, and lithologic character of Middle and Late Neoproterozoic rocks: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1087. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. ii Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................... 3 Sources of information ........................................................................................................ 2 Africa [AF]
  • Pan-African Orogeny 1

    Pan-African Orogeny 1

    Encyclopedia 0f Geology (2004), vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam AFRICA/Pan-African Orogeny 1 Contents Pan-African Orogeny North African Phanerozoic Rift Valley Within the Pan-African domains, two broad types of Pan-African Orogeny orogenic or mobile belts can be distinguished. One type consists predominantly of Neoproterozoic supracrustal and magmatic assemblages, many of juvenile (mantle- A Kröner, Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany R J Stern, University of Texas-Dallas, Richardson derived) origin, with structural and metamorphic his- TX, USA tories that are similar to those in Phanerozoic collision and accretion belts. These belts expose upper to middle O 2005, Elsevier Ltd. All Rights Reserved. crustal levels and contain diagnostic features such as ophiolites, subduction- or collision-related granitoids, lntroduction island-arc or passive continental margin assemblages as well as exotic terranes that permit reconstruction of The term 'Pan-African' was coined by WQ Kennedy in their evolution in Phanerozoic-style plate tectonic scen- 1964 on the basis of an assessment of available Rb-Sr arios. Such belts include the Arabian-Nubian shield of and K-Ar ages in Africa. The Pan-African was inter- Arabia and north-east Africa (Figure 2), the Damara- preted as a tectono-thermal event, some 500 Ma ago, Kaoko-Gariep Belt and Lufilian Arc of south-central during which a number of mobile belts formed, sur- and south-western Africa, the West Congo Belt of rounding older cratons. The concept was then extended Angola and Congo Republic, the Trans-Sahara Belt of to the Gondwana continents (Figure 1) although West Africa, and the Rokelide and Mauretanian belts regional names were proposed such as Brasiliano along the western Part of the West African Craton for South America, Adelaidean for Australia, and (Figure 1).
  • Precambrian in the External Zones of the Variscides: Central and Northern Parts O F the Armprican Massif

    Precambrian in the External Zones of the Variscides: Central and Northern Parts O F the Armprican Massif

    Chapter 1 Precambrian in the external zones of the Variscides: central and northern parts o f the Armprican Massif Jean Cogné,* Bernard auvray,* Lionel dupretv Jean-Jacques Chauvel,* and Dominique Rabu* * Centre Armoricain d ’Etude Structurale des Socles (CNRS), Institut de Géologie de l’Université de Rennes, 35042 Rennes-Cedex ’Laboratoire de Géologie Armoricaine, Université de Caen, 14032 Caen-Cedex 'B.R.G.M., Service Géologique Régional ‘Pays de Loire’, 10, Rue H. Picherit, 44300 Nantes Contents General framework J. Cogné 414 1.1 Precambrian in the Domnonean domain: the Trégor Massif of north Brittany B. Auvray 415 References 433 1.2 Problem of the Lower Brioverian in the context of a two-phase Cadomian orogenic cycle: the Precambrian of the Penthièvre Massif and its adjoining Mancellian boundary J. Cogné 434 References 443 1.3 The Proterozoic of northeastern Armorican Massif L. Dupret 444 References 460 1.4 Brioverian in central Brittany J.-J. Chauvel and D. Rabu 462 References 470 1.5 Geodynamic evolution of the Cadomian fold belt in the Armorican Massif: present data and new problems J. Cogné 470 References 482 413 Precambrian in the external zones o f the Variscides 415 Cadomian tectonic effects appear relatively minor defined in this massif (Cogné, 1959) and even if the and are seen to diminish in importance as one goes existence of an ancient basement is very likely, there towards the south and east away from the is no evidence so far for rocks older than 1000 Ma. Domnonean ‘Cordillera’ (ridge). The deformation This is in contrast with the situation further north style of these external parts of the Cadomian chain in the Trégor massif and in the Channel Islands is characterized by a lack of cleavage and a (Fig.
  • The Iberian Variscan Orogen

    The Iberian Variscan Orogen

    CHAPTER 1 THE IBERIAN VARISCAN OROGEN Aerial view of the tectonic repetition of limestone beds in the Láncara Formation, Primajas duplex structure of the Esla thrust (photo by J.L. Alonso) Martínez Catalán, J.R. Aller, J. Alonso, J.L. Bastida, F. Rocks of Upper Proterozoic to Carboniferous age - forming the Variscan or Hercynian orogen - crop out widely in the western part of the Iberian Peninsula, in what is called the Iberian or Hesperian Massif. These deformed rocks, often metamorphosed and intruded by different types of granitoids, were witness to the great mountain range formed in the late Paleozoic, basically in the Late Devonian and Carboniferous (between 370 and 290 million years ago), by the convergence and collision of two major continents: Laurasia and Gondwana. The Iberian Massif constitutes a geological framework of global interest. It is unique due to the continuity of its exposures and because it displays excellent records allowing the analysis of continental crust features, the tectonic, metamorphic and magmatic evolution of orogens, and therefore provides enormously relevant data about the lithospheric dynamics during the latest Precambrian and the Paleozoic. The Variscan orogen forms the basement of the Figure 1. Scheme showing the position of the Iberian Iberian Peninsula and of most of western and central Peninsula in relation to the Appalachians and the Europe. A crustal basement is the result of an orog- Caledonian and Variscan belts. Modified from eny, that is, the consequence of a deep remobilization Neuman and Max (1989). of the continental crust caused by the convergence of plates, and is associated to uplift and the creation of relief.
  • World Geomorphological Landscapes

    World Geomorphological Landscapes

    World Geomorphological Landscapes Series Editor: Piotr Migoń For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/10852 Monique Fort • Marie-Françoise André Editors Landscapes and Landforms o f F r a n c e Editors Monique Fort Marie-Françoise André Geography Department, UFR GHSS Laboratory of Physical CNRS UMR 8586 PRODIG and Environmental Geography (GEOLAB) University Paris Diderot-Sorbonne-Paris-Cité CNRS – Blaise Pascal University Paris , France Clermont-Ferrand , France Every effort has been made to contact the copyright holders of the fi gures and tables which have been reproduced from other sources. Anyone who has not been properly credited is requested to contact the publishers, so that due acknowledgment may be made in subsequent editions. ISSN 2213-2090 ISSN 2213-2104 (electronic) ISBN 978-94-007-7021-8 ISBN 978-94-007-7022-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7022-5 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013944814 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work.
  • Structure and Tectonic Evolution of the Armorican Massif

    Structure and Tectonic Evolution of the Armorican Massif

    Downloaded from http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 25, 2021 J. geol. Soc. London, Vol. 137, 1980, pp. 211-216. Printed in Northern Ireland. Conference Report Structure and tectonic evolution of the Armorican Massif R. A. Roach Report of a meeting of the Tectonic Studies Group held onthe foliated granodiorites and quartz-diorites, to at Burlington House, 14 March 1979. The meeting was helpdistinguishto Pentevrian andCadomian organized by Dr A. J. Barber and Dr P. R. Cobbold. magmatic-metamorphic episodes. Whiledeformation, metamorphic and magmatic The papers presented provided a timely review of the episodes occurring between 670 and 490 Ma are well major advances during the last decade in understand- establishedfor the northern part of theMassif, the ing the structure and tectonic evolutionof the Armori- significance of Cadomian structures in central Brittany canMassif. The establishment of specialresearch has been recently questioned. According to Hanmer, groups at the Universities of Rennes, Brest, Caen and Le Corre & Bertht,who presented a considerable Nantes, supported by the CNRS, has been the prime amount of supporting data, the main syn-metamorphic factor in this development. As a result, the geological deformation recognized within the Upper Brioverian evolution of this region is probably better understood of central Brittany is Hercynian in age. Less certain, thanthat of otherNercynian Massifs in central and however, is their conclusion that the Upper Brioverian western Europe. is thepost-tectonic molasse to the main phases of Thegeological evolution of the Armorican Massif Cadomianorogeny. CognC,in his model,envisaged canbe traced back more than 2000 Ma, beginning deposition of thecentral Brittany Brioverian on the withthe deposition of aLower Proterozoic or late southerncontinental slope of thePentevrian micro- Archaean supracrustal sequence which was polyphase continent, whereas Auvray & Lefort suggested deposi- deformed,metamorphosed, and intruded by granitic tion within a marginal sea.
  • Detrital Zircons from the Ordovician Rocks of the Pyrenees: Geochronological Constraints and Provenance

    Detrital Zircons from the Ordovician Rocks of the Pyrenees: Geochronological Constraints and Provenance

    TECTO-127007; No of Pages 11 Tectonophysics xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Tectonophysics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto Detrital zircons from the Ordovician rocks of the Pyrenees: Geochronological constraints and provenance Aina Margalef a,⁎, Pedro Castiñeiras b, Josep Maria Casas c,MarinaNavidadb, Montserrat Liesa d, Ulf Linnemann e, Mandy Hofmann e, Andreas Gärtner e a Centre d'Estudis de la Neu i de la Muntanya d'Andorra, Institut d'Estudis Andorrans, Andorra b Departamento de Petrología y Geoquímica, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain c Departament de Geodinàmica i Geofísica-Institut de Recerca GEOMODELS, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Martí i Franquès s/n, Barcelona 08028, Spain d Departament de Geoquímica, Petrologia i Prospecció Geològica, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Martí i Franquès s/n, Barcelona 08028, Spain e Senckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Museum für Mineralogie und Geologie, Sektion Geochronologie, Königsbrücker Landstraße 159, D-01109 Dresden, Germany article info abstract Article history: The first LA-ICP-MS U–Pb detrital zircon ages from quartzites located below (three samples) and above (one Received 31 August 2015 sample) the Upper Ordovician unconformity in the Central Pyrenees (the Rabassa Dome, Andorra) were investi- Received in revised form 9 March 2016 gated. The maximum depositional age for the Jújols Group, below the unconformity, based on the youngest Accepted 14 March 2016 detrital zircon population, is around 475 Ma (Early Ordovician), whereas for the Bar Quartzite Fm., above the Available online xxxx unconformity, the presence of only two zircons of 442 and 443 Ma precludes obtaining a precise maximum sed- Keywords: imentation age.
  • Palaeozoic Geography and Palaeomagnetism of the Central European Variscan and Alpine Fold Belts

    Palaeozoic Geography and Palaeomagnetism of the Central European Variscan and Alpine Fold Belts

    Palaeozoic Geography and Palaeomagnetism of the Central European Variscan and Alpine Fold Belts Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultät für Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München vorgelegt von Dipl.-Geol. Michael Rupert Schätz am 17. Mai 2004 Promoter: PD Dr. Jennifer Tait Co-Promoter: Prof. Dr. Valerian Bachtadse Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 13. Juli 2004 Contents Glossary ........................................................................................................................... 3 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................... 5 Zusammenfassung ................................................................................................................. 6 Chapter 1 Introduction.................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Palaeomagnetism ................................................................................................... 10 1.2 General geodynamic and tectonic framework of Central Europe.................... 11 1.3 Aim of this work.............................................................................................. 21 1.4 Geological setting of the selected sampling areas ........................................... 24 Chapter 2 Sampling and methods ................................................................................. 36 2.1 Sampling and Laboratory procedure...............................................................
  • Multiple Crust Reworking in the French Armorican Variscan Belt

    Multiple Crust Reworking in the French Armorican Variscan Belt

    Multiple crust reworking in the French Armorican Variscan belt: implication for the genesis of uranium-fertile leucogranites Christophe Ballouard, Marc Poujol, Armin Zeh To cite this version: Christophe Ballouard, Marc Poujol, Armin Zeh. Multiple crust reworking in the French Armorican Variscan belt: implication for the genesis of uranium-fertile leucogranites. International Journal of Earth Sciences, Springer Verlag, 2018, 107 (7), pp.2317-2336. 10.1007/s00531-018-1600-3. insu- 01717290 HAL Id: insu-01717290 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-01717290 Submitted on 26 Feb 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Manuscript Click here to download Manuscript Ms_Ballouard et al__IJES_R1.docx Click here to view linked References Multiple crust reworking in the French Armorican Variscan belt: implication for the genesis of uranium-fertile leucogranites 1 C. Ballouarda,b*, M. Poujolb, A. Zehc 2 aDepartment of Geology, University of Johannesburg, PO Box 254, Auckland Park 2006, 3 South Africa 4 b Univ Rennes, CNRS, Géosciences Rennes
  • Paleozoic Evolution of Pre-Variscan Terranes: from Gondwana to the Variscan Collision

    Paleozoic Evolution of Pre-Variscan Terranes: from Gondwana to the Variscan Collision

    Geological Society of America Special Paper 364 2002 Paleozoic evolution of pre-Variscan terranes: From Gondwana to the Variscan collision Gérard M. Stamp×i Institut de Géologie et Paléontologie, Université de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland Jürgen F. von Raumer Institut de Minéralogie et Pétrographie, Université de Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland Gilles D. Borel Institut de Géologie et Paléontologie, Université de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland ABSTRACT The well-known Variscan basement areas of Europe contain relic terranes with a pre-Variscan evolution testifying to their peri-Gondwanan origin (e.g., relics of Neo- proterozoic volcanic arcs, and subsequent stages of accretionary wedges, backarc rift- ing, and spreading). The evolution of these terranes was guided by the diachronous subduction of the proto-Tethys oceanic ridge under different segments of the Gond- wana margin. This subduction triggered the emplacement of magmatic bodies and the formation of backarc rifts, some of which became major oceanic realms (Rheic, paleo- Tethys). Consequently, the drifting of Avalonia was followed, after the Silurian and a short Ordovician orogenic event, by the drifting of Armorica and Alpine domains, ac- companied by the opening of the paleo-Tethys. The slab rollback of the Rheic ocean is viewed as the major mechanism for the drifting of the European Variscan terranes. This, in turn, generated a large slab pull force responsible for the opening of major rift zones within the passive Eurasian margin. Therefore, the µrst Middle Devonian Variscan orogenic event is viewed as the result of a collision between terranes detached from Gondwana (grouped as the Hun superterrane) and terranes detached from Eurasia.
  • The Sudetic Geological Mosaic: Insights Into the Root of the Variscan Orogen

    The Sudetic Geological Mosaic: Insights Into the Root of the Variscan Orogen

    Przegl¹d Geologiczny, vol. 52, no. 8/2, 2004 The Sudetic geological mosaic: Insights into the root of the Variscan orogen Ryszard Kryza*, Stanis³aw Mazur*, Teresa Oberc-Dziedzic* A b s t r a c t: The Sudetes in the NE part of the Bohemian Massif stretch between the NW–SE-trending Odra Fault Zone and Elbe Fault Zone and represent a structural mosaic which was shaped, predominantly, during the Variscan orogeny. They are composed of various geological units, including basement units in which Neoproterozoic to Carboniferous rocks are exposed, and a post-orogenic cover of younger deposits. During the long history of geological research, the Sudetes have become a “type locality” for a range of important geological phenomena, such as granites and orthogneisses, ophiolites and (meta)volcanic sequences, granulites, eclogites and blueschists, nappe tectonics and terrane concepts. In spite of significant recent achievements, many key problems need further study, and a selection of them is proposed in this paper: (a) the presence of older, Neoproterozoic (Cadomian) rocks and their position within the Variscan collage, (b) the character and emplacement setting of Palaeozoic, pre-Variscan sedimentary successions and magmatic complexes (including ophiolites), (c) structural evolution, metamorphism (in particular HP/T grades) and exhumation of deeper crustal blocks during the Variscan orogeny, and (d) post-orogenic development. Future investigations would require an interdisciplinary approach, combining various geological disciplines: structural geology, petrology, geochemistry, geophysics and geochronology, and, also, multilateral interlaboratory cooperation. Key words: Variscan Belt, Sudetes, Cadomian orogeny, Variscan orogeny, (meta)granitoids, (meta)volcanics, ophiolites, granulites, eclogites, blueschists, nappe tectonics, terranes The Variscan orogen of Europe, one of the classically compared to the Sudetic mountain range, and largely cove- defined, global-scale orogenic systems (Suess, 1926; Kos- red by Cenozoic deposits.
  • Large Scale Variscan Granitoid Intrusion Throughout Europe: a Lateral Geochronological Trend? � K

    Large Scale Variscan Granitoid Intrusion Throughout Europe: a Lateral Geochronological Trend? K

    Large scale Variscan granitoid intrusion throughout Europe: a lateral geochronological trend? K. Oud BSc Thesis, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, July 2006 Abstract Large-scale granitoid intrusion during the Variscan orogeny (370 to 250 Ma) in Europe above subduction zones of that time is assumed to be the result of a heat pulse due to slab detachment. This would show from a lateral trend in age of emplacement of all granitic bodies, migrating through the complete Variscan fold belt, and thus, a younging direction perpendicular to the former subduction zones. To test this, an inventory of intrusion ages (on the basis of U-Pb, Rb-Sr and K-Ar analysis), typology (I- or S-type) and location of 70 granitic bodies in the European Variscan fold belt, from the Armorican Massif to the Bohemian Massif, was made. From the collected data, no lateral trend in age is observed. However, a trend in age parallel to former subduction zones is shown in most massifs, with a younging direction towards the thrusting vergence. This is probably the result of nappe stacking. In the Armorican Massif and Massif Central, granites are all S-type, which is probably the cause of continental subduction. In central Europe, the typology is mixed S- and I-type, which can be caused by subduction of either continental or oceanic lithosphere. 1. Introduction result of the ‘usual’ heat and melt generation attributed to subduction The Variscan orogeny yielded a large processes. However, there is another number of granitoid intrusions throughout possibility of granite emplacement that all of the European Variscides.