Lux in Tenebris Lucet Illuminating Rational-Spiritualism and the Metaphor of Inner Light in a Quaker - Collegiant Dispute (1657-1662)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lux in Tenebris Lucet Illuminating Rational-Spiritualism and the Metaphor of Inner Light in a Quaker - Collegiant Dispute (1657-1662) Lux in Tenebris Lucet Illuminating rational-spiritualism and the metaphor of inner light in a Quaker - Collegiant dispute (1657-1662) Martin van Wattingen 0153346 University of Amsterdam Master Thesis, Research MA Theology & Religious Studies (June, 2017) Thesis Supervisor: dr. H. J. Borsje Second Reader: Prof. dr. L. van Bunge Table of Contents Introduction ………………………………………………………………… 3 Reseach Questions and Methodology ……….……………………… 9 Enlightenment Historiography ……….………………………………. 12 From Kant to postmodernism …………………………..…………. 12 Jonathan Israel and the Radical Enlightenment …….………….. 17 Historical Background ……..………………………………………….. 22 The Dutch Collegiants ……………………………………………… 25 Early Quakers in Holland ….………………………………………. 30 The Pamplet War ……..…………………………………………………. 34 William Ames, Het Ligt dat in de duisternisse schijnt …..………. 37 Pieter Balling, Het licht op den kandelaar ……………………….. 61 Conclusion ……..…………………………………………………………. 70 Bibliography …….………………………………………………………… 73 1 Preface and Acknowledgments The thesis before you was my final proof of competence for obtaining the Master of Arts (MA) degree from the University of Amsterdam. It was written to fulfill the graduation requirements and, at the same time, it is the end result of my time as a Research-master student and concludes my education. According to historian Jan Wagenaar, the first Collegiants in Amsterdam held their meetings in a house on the corner of the Rokin and the Kalfsvelsteeg, merely a ‘stone’s throw’ away from the university library (Special Collections) where I have spend so much time completing my research. Coming from a long line of ‘Amsterdammers,’ the city’s history has fascinated me for as long as I can remember. Gradually, I started to develop a special interest in the intellectual ‘climate’ in the Golden Age of the Dutch Republic. It would not take long before Spinoza and the Collegiants ‘crossed my path.’ When you say Spinoza or Collegiants, the name Wiep van Bunge will follow suit. Our introduction was, understandably, a humbling and inspirational experience. It has been an honor that professor van Bunge has co-read my thesis. My supervisor, dr. Jacqueline Borsje, who was responsible for that introduction, has to be credited for the completion of my thesis in general. At a crucial moment she gave me the much-needed motivational speech and ‘push’ in the right direction. I am gratefull for both their time and dedication. I also wish to express my sincere gratitude to my family, friends and girlfriend for their love, trust, support and encouragement when I needed it the most. And last, but definitely not least, my parents and my sister deserve particular appreciation. The completion of this project would not have been accomplished without your confidence and endless patience. 2 Introduction In 1662, an extremely controversial pamphlet circled among the intellectual elite in Amsterdam, the largest and most densely populated city in the Dutch Republic. Its ambiguous title, Het licht op den kandelaar. Dienende, tot opmerkinge van de voornaamste dingen; in het boekje genaamt De verborgentheden van het rijke Ghodts, &c. tegens Galenus Abrahamsz., en zijn Toestemmers &c. verhandelt en beschreven door William Ames (The Light on the Candlestick. Serving to Remark on the Foremost Things in the Book Called The Mysteries of God’s Kingdom, against Galenus Abrahamsz. and his Supporters by William Ames), engendered substantial controversy concerning the author and its purpose. Although Het licht was published anonymously and “printed for the author” (Gedrukt voor den Autheur), it is now fairly certain that the author was Pieter Balling, a close friend of Spinoza who frequently visited the meetings of a specific group of protestant dissenters in the Dutch Republic, who were called Collegiants. Over time, however, the tract had been attributed to others as well. Especially William Ames, whose name is displayed prominently on the title page, has often been regarded as the author. Yet Ames was not the author. Instead, he wrote The Mysteries of God’s Kingdom in which he responded to Galenus Abrahamsz. de Haan, a minister of the Mennonite congregation in Amsterdam and leader of the local branch of Collegiants in the capital. But the ambiguity can only partly be attributed to the puzzling title. The theme of Balling’s pamphlet was the divine light that guides humankind, a topic Ames had written many times about. In fact, Ames’ oeuvre consisted primarily of publications with similar titles. As one of the first Quaker missionaries in Holland, he had often felt the need to defend the doctrine of the inner light, which was so central to their message. By the time Het licht op den kandelaar was issued, Quaker fascination with the inner light had become the main source of some heated arguments and a protracted “pamphlet war” between the two groups. Light has been a common metaphor for truth, knowledge, the life force, (spiritual) insight, individual development, etc. since ancient times. Not only did light bear a religious connotation in its biblical expression of Christ as the divine light and the ‘gift’ of wisdom bestowed from above, as stressed, for instance, by Augustine in his theory of divine illumination. But it was also, as 3 knowledge of the real, associated with the ancient philosophy of Plato. In the Republic Plato had Socrates draw an analogy between the sun, which illuminates the visible realm, and the Idea of the Good illuminating the intelligible realm. Even Aristotle, who objected that knowledge ultimately derives from the senses and sense perception is connected with the soul, claimed that the soul needs an inner light to perceive. A century and a half of humanist scholarship, Arthur Herman observes, had shown Enlightenment historians and philosophers how much Christianity’s evolution owed to a fusion of Jewish and Neo-Platonic ideas. But over the course of the eighteenth century, the understanding Enlightenment thinkers had of the cultural and historical separation between them and the ‘ancients’ made Plato, not Aristotle, “the big loser in all this.”1 Most influential was John Locke, who, in Aristotelian fashion, dismantled Plato’s worldview and political philosophy by stressing the importance of perception and experience. Clearly mirroring Aristotle’s tabula rasa, Locke rejected the principle of innate ideas and emphasized that our mind is blank slate waiting to be written on. This contradiction, Herman argues, between Plato’s worldview and the view of reality Enlightenment thinkers inherited from Aristotle and Locke, was the main reason the Enlightenment “disliked Plato so much.”2 In her elaborate examination of how the Enlightenment’s construal of its ‘dark’ past served as a foil against which its own defining narratives were formulated, Alicia Montoya suggests that, as a rhetorical construct, the ‘medieval’ determined, to some extent, the eighteenth-century perception of modernity.3 According to Montoya, the Enlightenment’s foundational rhetoric renegotiated the meaning of the ancient metaphor of light to create a polemic with the dark and ignorant Middle Ages. Italian humanism in the Renaissance had reversed biblical dualism and the Augustinian metaphor of Christian light versus pagan darkness. Francesco Petrarch in particular had presented the Middle Ages as a dark period that emerged after the golden Age of Antiquity.4 Late seventeenth- and eighteenth-century thinkers deviated 1 A. Herman, The Cave and the Light: Plato versus Aristotle, and the struggle for the soul of Western Civilization (New York, 2013), pp. 362-366. 2 Ibid. p. 365. 3 A. Montoya, Medievalist Enlightenment: From Charles Perrault to Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Cambridge, 2013). 4 Ibid. pp. 43-46. Cf. J. Tunturi, “Darkness as a Metaphor in the Historiography of the Enlightenment,” in: Approaching Religion, 1 (2011), pp. 20-25. See also T. 4 from Christianity’s authoritative discourse and denounced the doctrine of divine light descending on the believer. Instead, following Descartes’ lumen naturale, they started to propagate the idea of the natural light of reason as a source of human knowledge and truth. “In its most common eighteenth- century use,” Montoya states, “the metaphor of light was assigned primarily a theological meaning, foregrounding perceived oppositions between light as reason and light as revelation.”5 According to Andrew Fix, an expert in Collegiant studies, light retained its central role in European religious and philosophical thought until it began to acquire a new, more secular usage in the late seventeenth century.6 In his Prophecy and Reason, Fix propounds the thesis that the changing view of the individual conscience among a specific group of Protestant dissenters in the Dutch Republic, who were called Collegiants, provides a perfect example of the secularizing and rationalizing trends occurring all over early modern Europe. In his view, “a trend toward secularism and rationalism developed out of religious despair and accelerated as the wars of religion drew to a close in 1648.”7 The decades following the Treaty of Westphalia witnessed the significant process of intellectual evolution that transformed the (older) spiritual notion of inner light into the natural light of human reason. In fact, Fix states, “nothing more clearly illustrates the role of Collegiant thought in the monumental seventeenth-century intellectual transition from faith to reason than the changing conception of the inner light found in Collegiant writings.”8 His argument is that the movement
Recommended publications
  • <LA Jitterary Quaker: John Smith of ^Burlington and Philadelphia
    <LA Jitterary Quaker: John Smith of ^Burlington and Philadelphia ISTORIANS of literary culture in pre-Revolutionary America have passed rather lightly over the Middle Colonies, focus- ing their attention for the most part upon the colonies to H 1 the north and south, upon New England and Virginia. The exten- sive intervening region, diversified in racial characteristics and social patterns, highly developed in its intellectual interests, and extremely important for the future of American culture, remains virtually unexplored from this point of view. An important consequence is that we know relatively little about the cultural climate of colonial Philadelphia, the principal urban center in the Middle Colonies, destined presently to become the literary and intellectual as well as the political capital of the United States. "By the close of the colonial age," writes Moses Coit Tyler, "Philadelphia had grown to be the centre of a literary activity more vital and more versatile than was to be seen any where else upon the continent, except at Boston." 2 Such literary activity presupposes a cultivated and receptive reading public as well as a group of practicing authors. The accepted view of Philadelphia's cultural life at this period has distinguished three major groups: (i) a small, fairly sophisticated circle around Provost William Smith of the 1 Thomas G. Wright, Literary Culture in Early New England (New Haven, 1920) and Louis B. Wright, The First Gentlemen of Virginia (San Marino, 1940) are model studies in these two fields. Chester T. Hallenbeck, ed., "A Colonial Reading List from the Union Library of Hatboro, Pennsylvania," Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, LVI.
    [Show full text]
  • Quakeriana Notes
    QUAKER CLASsjSX 7(o3^ BOOK H 3 QnZ; THE LIBRARY «p.7L OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE THE GIFT OF THE BDTTOR ACCESSION NO. 2L,0 £^, 1 8 2L For Reference ' NOT TO BE TAKEN FROM THE LIBRARY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from LYRASIS members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/quakeriananotes113have QUAKER I ANA NOTES CONCERNING TREASURES NEW MB OLD IN TEE QUAKER COLLECTIONS OP HATERFORD COLLEGE STO. 1-13 TENTH MONTH, 1933 SIXTH MONTE, 1942 HAVEEFORD, PENNSTLViNIA QUAKERIANA NOTES Concerning Treasures New and Old in the Quaker Collections of Haverford College Edited by Rayner W. Kelsey, Curator Published at Haverford, Pennsylvania Number 1 Tenth Month, 1933 The Launching His small literary craft is launched on the great sea for a reason. The editor believes that a goodly number of people care about the Quaker collections of Haverford Col- lege. Although the Haverford library is an outstanding one for a small college, only the Quaker section of it can claim to be indispensable to the scholarship of its field. This section contains more than ten thousand printed titles, apart from its valuable manuscript col- lections. It is approached in size and value by only one other library of Quakeriana in America, that of Swarthmore College, with which it works in close cooperation. It contains various manuscripts and printed titles, rare beyond measure. It is adding thousands of entries yearly to its card indexes, thus opening a doorway to store-houses of historical material other- wise almost inaccessible. It is well worth telling about. Quakeriana Notes will try to tell this story.
    [Show full text]
  • Filosofia, Storia Della Filosofia E Scienze Umane
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI MACERATA DIPARTIMENTO DI STUDI UMANISTICI CORSO DI DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN HUMAN SCIENCES – FILOSOFIA, STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA E SCIENZE UMANE CICLO XXIX TITOLO DELLA TESI ADAM BOREEL (1602 – 1665): HIS LIFE AND THOUGHT RELATORE DOTTORANDO Chiar.mo Prof. FILIPPO MIGNINI Dott. FRANCESCO QUATRINI COORDINATORE Chiar.mo Prof. GUIDO ALLINEY ANNO 2017 1 Adam Boreel (1602 – 1665): His Life and Thought Index Introduction…………………………………………………….p. 5 Table of acronyms…………………………………..………...p. 16 Part I: The Life of Adam Boreel and his writings Chapter I: 1602 – 1627…………………………………p. 17 . Boreel’s childhood and his first studies at the University of Leiden……………………………p. 17 . The first trip to England and Ziegler’s case…….p. 27 Chapter II: 1628 – 1638………………………………...p. 36 . Boreel’s second enrollment at the University of Leiden……………………………………….....p. 37 . 1632: a new trip to England? A discussion about Schneider’s biography and the first contacts with the Hartlib Circle…………………………………...p. 42 Chapter III: 1639 – 1654……………………………….p. 53 . The vocalized edition of the Mishnah and the interests in Jewish people………………...…….p. 55 . The first works of Adam Boreel………………..p. 71 . The College of Amsterdam…………………….p. 79 . Boreel’s scientific interests and his financial problems………………………………………p. 103 Chapter IV: 1655 – 1665……………………………...p. 112 . Boreel’s stay in London……………………….p. 113 . The writing of the Jesus Nazarenus Legislator……………………………………..p. 124 . The translation of the Mishnah and the “Societas de propaganda Dei et Christi Jesu conformitate”…………………………………p. 135 . The Amsterdam College………………………p. 145 2 . The illness, the last will, and the death of Adam Boreel…………………………………………p. 166 Chapter V: The Bibliography of Adam Boreel………..p.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighteenth-Century Quakerism and the Rehabilitation Of
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Lincoln Institutional Repository ‘Propper and safe’ to be published: eighteenth-century Quakerism and the rehabilitation of seventeenth-century radicalism. Erin Bell, University of Lincoln, UK According to the English edition of Willem Sewel’s History of the rise, increase, and progress of the Christian people called Quakers (1722 [1717]), the first-generation Quaker preacher James Nayler rode to Bristol in early November 1656, and passing through the Suburbs of Bristol, one Thomas Woodcock went bare-headed before him; one of the Women led his Horse, Dorcas, Martha and Hannah spread their Scarfs and Handkerchiefs before him, and the Company sung, Holy, Holy, Holy, is the Lord God of Hosts...Thus these mad People sung, whilst they were walking through the Mire and Dirt, till they came into Bristol, where they were examin’d by the Magistrates, and committed to Prison....1 Condemning his followers as mad for their treatment of Nayler who, in his entrance to Bristol imitated Jesus’ into Jerusalem, this version of Nayler’s ‘fall’ demonstrates the changes which had taken place in Quakerism between the 1650s and the eighteenth century. If, as Richard Bailey suggests, early Quakerism was a ‘thaumaturgical (signs and wonders) movement’2 then signs such as Nayler’s, whether the result of ‘celestial inhabitation christology’, the ‘flesh and bone’ presence of Christ in the believer3 or, as Leo Damrosch claims, ‘a single symbolic act condensing a number of competing Quaker beliefs’4, were to be expected, if not easily explained.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmopolitan Networks German Historical Institute London Bulletin Supplement No
    Cosmopolitan Networks German Historical Institute London Bulletin Supplement No. 2 GENERAL EDITOR: Andreas Gestrich Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914 EDITED BY ANDREAS GESTRICH AND MARGRIT SCHULTE BEERBÜHL GERMAN HISTORICAL INSTITUTE LONDON © German Historical Institute London, 2011 Published by the German Historical Institute London 17 Bloomsbury Square, London WC1A 2NJ, UK 2011 ISSN 0269-8552 FOREWORD The present volume is the outcome of an international workshop held at the German Historical Institute London in December 2007. The workshop focused on the study of economic and social networks which contributed to the interconnecting of distant regions. From the late Middle Ages, European merchants of different ethnic origins engaged in international trade, settled in the leading port cities of the time, and frequently mixed with the local elites, not only in Europe, but increasingly worldwide. The networks they created soon became global in their geographical dimension. Whether they were cosmo- politan in quality, that is, whether they not only connected distant places, but also initiated a process of mediating various cultures through the encounter of people of diverse ethnic origins and cultur- al backgrounds, was one of the questions asked by this workshop. This focus on the quality of network relations and interactions rather than their quantitative dimensions sets this workshop apart from the growing number of conferences and volumes on merchants’ net- works in general. In the process of preparing this book for publication the editors have incurred many debts. Apart from the authors, we would like to thank all the other participants in the workshop for their contribu- tions and comments, in particular, Thomas Biskup, John Davis, Dorothée Marie-Louise Doepfer, Mark Häberlein, Albane Forestier, Roger Knight, Rainer Liedtke, Ulrich Pfister, and Thomas Weller.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmopolitan Networks
    German Historical Institute London Bulletin Supplement Bd. 2 (2011) Copyright Das Digitalisat wird Ihnen von perspectivia.net, der Online-Publikationsplattform der Max Weber Stiftung – Deutsche Geisteswissenschaftliche Institute im Ausland, zur Verfügung gestellt. Bitte beachten Sie, dass das Digitalisat urheberrechtlich geschützt ist. Erlaubt ist aber das Lesen, das Ausdrucken des Textes, das Herunterladen, das Speichern der Daten auf einem eigenen Datenträger soweit die vorgenannten Handlungen ausschließlich zu privaten und nicht-kommerziellen Zwecken erfolgen. Eine darüber hinausgehende unerlaubte Verwendung, Reproduktion oder Weitergabe einzelner Inhalte oder Bilder können sowohl zivil- als auch strafrechtlich verfolgt werden. 7 Meeting Friends and Doing Business: Quaker Missionary and Commercial Activities in Europe, 1655–1720 SÜNNE JUTERCZENKA The Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) originated mainly from ‘the middling sort of people’.1 Historians have observed that it sub- sequently moved up the social scale, in William C. Braithwaite’s words, ‘from lower-middle-class obscurity into upper-middle-class respectability’,2 at the same time as it developed from a loose move- ment of persecuted Nonconformists into a highly organized and rep- utable Society. Recent studies of the social history of the Society have focused on individual regions; they have highlighted a degree of geo- graphical variation in both occupation and social status during the first few decades,3 and have thus offered a more differentiated pic- ture. Through the first two and a half centuries however, the overall pattern remains one of upward social mobility and simultaneous internal consolidation.4 When the famous confectionery manufactur- 1 Barry Reay, The Quakers and the English Revolution (London, 1985), 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Meanings and Uses of Husbandry Among Quakers, C. 1650-C. 1860 Erin A
    Quaker Studies Volume 10 | Issue 2 Article 2 2006 From Ploughing the Wilderness to Hedging the Vineyard: Meanings and uses of Husbandry among Quakers, C. 1650-C. 1860 Erin A. Bell University of Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/quakerstudies Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Bell, Erin A. (2006) "From Ploughing the Wilderness to Hedging the Vineyard: Meanings and uses of Husbandry among Quakers, C. 1650-C. 1860," Quaker Studies: Vol. 10: Iss. 2, Article 2. Available at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/quakerstudies/vol10/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quaker Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 134 QUAKER STUDIES QUAKER STUDIES 10/2 (2006) [135-159] ISSN 1363-013X understand wider developments within the context of a specific case study. Helen Plant's contribution on women's leadership in the Yorkshire Quaker conmmnity explores the reasons why women came to dominate the spiritual leadership of the Society during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. As prominent Quaker men became increasingly concerned with business activities, Plant demon­ strates how it fell upon women to provide spiritual leadership. She argues that 'without women's ministry, there would have been little counterweight to the spiritual deadness which concerned observers identified in many Meetings during this period' (p. 230).
    [Show full text]