DOCSLIB.ORG

Council of Churches for the City of New York: Department of Church Planning and Research Records, 1855 – 1985

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Council of Churches for the City of New York: Department of Church Planning and Research Records, 1855 – 1985 The Burke Library Archives, Columbia University Libraries, Union Theological Seminary, New York William Adams Brown Ecumenical Archives Group Finding Aid for Council of Churches for the City of New York: Department of Church Planning and Research Records, 1855 – 1985 http://www.cccny.net/index.html Finding Aid prepared by: Michaela Biondi and student team, 2011 made possible in part by a grant from the Documentary Heritage Program of the New York State Archives, a program of the State Education Department. Updates by Brigette C. Kamsler, 2012 with funding from the Henry Luce Foundation. Summary Information Creator: Council of Churches of the City of New York Title: Council of Churches of the City of New York, Department of Church Planning and Research Records Inclusive dates: 1855 – 1985 Bulk dates: 1930 – 1980 Abstract: Department of Church Planning and Research records include a variety of population/neighborhood studies for the five boroughs of New York and the Tri-State region. Also includes studies of churches and denominations in these areas to aid in the planning work of the department and of Council’s various members. Size: 95 boxes, 1 flat OS box, 3 roll boxes, 58 linear feet Storage: Offsite storage, except Box OS 96-99 Repository: The Burke Library Union Theological Seminary 3041 Broadway New York, NY 10027 Email: [email protected] WAB: CCCNY Dept. of Church Planning and Research Records, 1855 – 1985 2 Administrative Information Provenance: The records of the Department of Church Planning and Research were donated at the request of the Department itself with the approval of the Board of Directors of the Council of Churches of the City of New York. This is documented by a donation letter to Richard D. Spoor from Leland Gartrell dated March 12, 1986. Access: Archival papers are available to registered readers for consultation by appointment only. Please contact archives staff by email to [email protected], or by postal mail to The Burke Library address on page 1, as far in advance as possible Burke Library staff is available for inquiries or to request a consultation on archival or special collections research. Access Restrictions: The collection is unrestricted to readers. Certain materials, however, are in a fragile condition, and this may necessitate restriction in handling and copying. Please note that boxes held in Offsite storage will require 48 hours' notice in response to a weekday request for retrieval. Preferred Citation: Item description, William Adams Brown Ecumenical Archives: Council of Churches of the City of New York, Dept. of Church Planning and Research, series # box #, folder #, The Burke Library at Union Theological Seminary, Columbia University in the City of New York. Administrative History The Council of Churches of the City of New York (CCCNY) is an ecumenical organization whose roots go back to the 1815 creation of the Brooklyn Mission Society, which planted churches and ministries to serve the growing borough’s communities. In 1895 the New York Federation of Churches and Christian Workers, the oldest of the council organizations, was established to continue and expand that work. Several name changes were made to reflect the development of the organization: The Federation of Churches and Christian Organizations in New York City (1901–1925), The Greater New York Federation of Churches (1925–1943), The Protestant Council of the City of New York (1943–1968), and finally in 1968 to the current name. The Council’s Department of Church Planning and Research was modeled after the Pathfinding Service for the Churches, started in 1946 by the New York City Mission Society, to serve as “part of an advance program designed to meet certain emerging problems which no other religious organization was meeting” (Prospectus for Pathfinding). When it became clear to the Pathfinding Service leadership that their particular work was best suited to support the mission and work of the then-Protestant Council of Churches, transfer of the service to the Council was negotiated during 1953 and the Pathfinding Service closed its doors at the end of that year (general letter to friends from Kenneth D. Miller, Chairman). The Department of Church Planning and Research was officially inaugurated on January 1, 1954. As part of the Council, the Department of Church Planning and Research was tasked as the “agency through which the ecumenical church can carry out its planning function and coordinate church planning in New York City.” Its five point plan of goals included a) To define problems generated by the implementation of mission in NYC and to develop solutions to these problems; Michaela Biondi, 2011 and Brigette C. Kamsler 2/26/20 WAB: CCCNY Dept. of Church Planning and Research Records, 1855 – 1985 3 b) To develop joint plans for mission and to evaluate their effectiveness; c) To communicate new knowledge and information about significant ideas for mission; d) To provide liaison with governmental units, private corporations, and various social agencies; e) To provide members of the Department with a means for formal communication, formulating decisions, researching problems of mission, developing and testing new hypotheses for mission, drafting and consulting in the drafting of plans to solve specific problems and consulting with members regarding the formal aspects of their planning operations (Preface to the By-Laws, 1965 revision). The Department was comprised of representatives of denominations, of borough divisions and of the Board of Directors of the Council and the various interdenominational units developed by the Department. It was headed by a Chairman, nominated by the Department and elected the General Assembly at its annual meetings, a Vice-Chairman and a Secretary, both nominated by the Department. The Department’s work of investigating and reporting on religious life in the city and surrounding areas produced valuable information for planning new churches and services in areas which were lacking. One of the council’s biggest successes was their method of canvassing a neighborhood to gather statistical data which became the model for the federal census taken every ten years. The struggle to raise sufficient finances to support the staff and its work constantly threatened the Department which lived under a constant threat of cut-backs and layoffs. The department was formally closed in 1985. Collection Scope and Content Note The records, which include materials from outside sources, both published and unpublished, as well as research reports generated by the Department itself, provide information on the populations of the five boroughs of New York City and the surrounding Tri-State region including Long Island’s two counties, northern New Jersey, south western Connecticut, and the Lower and Middle Hudson Valley (LMHV). Materials note changes within individual communities, the churches and provided services. Information on concerns surrounding young persons and particular ethnic groups is also included as well as federal census data for several areas and several decades. The collection is organized in five series: Series 1: Pathfinding Service for the Churches, 1938 – 1953 (2 boxes, 1.00 lin. ft.) This series contains an organizational history, various minutes and reports, and a Protestant Council Appraisal study. Reports on specific topics or groups created by the service appear in other series as topically appropriate. Series 2: Department of Church Planning and Research Office Records, 1946 – 1984 (13 boxes, 6.50 lin. ft.) This series contains the meeting minutes of the Executive Committee, Departmental meetings, Divisional Offices, and the Personnel Committee, departmental newsletters Michaela Biondi, 2011 and Brigette C. Kamsler 2/26/20 WAB: CCCNY Dept. of Church Planning and Research Records, 1855 – 1985 4 and a small amount of general files and reports from the Department. Department reports regarding particular topics or locations are filed with those topics or locations. Series 3: New York City Reports, 1855; 1920 – 1983 (51 boxes, 25.50 lin. ft.) This series is divided into two sub-series: A: By Borough and B: By Subject. This information is both from outside sources and reports generated by the department. Subseries 3A: By Borough Each borough is divided into general borough-wide information, community reports (usually by neighborhoods), reports on specific churches in the borough, then reports on denominational activity in that borough. Bay Chester, City Island, Fordham and Jerome Park do not have their own folders but can be found in larger reports of the Borough as a whole. Of note are b.21/f.3 and b.23/f.13, both which include “Negro” church studies (Brooklyn and Manhattan), and b.18, f.3 (Bronx) and b.40, f.7 which has the only reports on Jewish congregations in the collection. Reports and information on Harlem are found in boxes 25 – 26. Subseries 3B: By Subject This includes NYC Denominations, which reports on eighteen Protestant denominations and also includes Eastern Orthodox, Society of Friends, Waldensian and Scientology. The YMCA is included in this group, and other reports on the organization are found in boxes 16, 24, 31, 32, 36, 74 and 83. Other subjects includes Spanish language communities and other cultural groups, race studies (boxes 45–48; 51–53) and a series of Departmental research materials on such topics as: Christian education, church planning, the church and social issues, housing, mission strategy, tax, water and sewer usage, and demographics and the church (boxes 48–60). A group of outside published materials including social indices, socio-economic statistics, and youth delinquency statistics and the Department of City Planning newsletters and Department of Commerce and Public Events bulletins are included in this group of materials (boxes 60–66). Series 4: Tri-State Region Reports, 1930 – 1983 (18 boxes, 9.00 lin. ft.) This series contains information on Connecticut, Long Island, the Lower and Middle Hudson Valley (LMHV) counties and northern New Jersey. The materials for Connecticut are few and consist primarily of federal census data from 1960–1980.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brooklyn: Economic Development and the State of Its Economy
    Brooklyn: Economic Development And the State of Its Economy February 2004 New York State Office of the State Comptroller Alan G. Hevesi Office of the State Deputy Comptroller for the City of New York Kenneth B. Bleiwas, Deputy Comptroller Report 12-2004 Additional copies of this report may be obtained from: Office of the State Comptroller New York City Public Information Office 633 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017 Telephone: (212) 681-4824 Or through the Comptroller’s Web site at: www.osc.state.ny.us To help reduce printing costs, please notify the Office of the State Deputy Comptroller at (212) 383-3916 if you wish to have your name removed from our mailing list or if your address has changed. Contents I. Executive Summary..................................................................................................1 II. An Overview of the Brooklyn Economy .................................................................. 3 III. Economic Development in Brooklyn ...................................................................... 7 Major Issues Affecting Economic Development...............................................................................................................7 Waterfront Development and Zoning ................................................................................................................................8 Retail Expansion: Big Box Stores.....................................................................................................................................10 Tourism..........................................................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • THE BAGEL ECONOMY: What an Iconic Urban Food Can Teach Us About Immigrant Life in New York City, 1880-1910
    Fordham University DigitalResearch@Fordham Urban Studies Masters Theses Urban Studies 1-1-2013 The aB gel Economy: What An Iconic Urban Food Can Teach Us About Immigrant Life in New York City, 1880-1910 Jamie S. Feigenbaum [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://fordham.bepress.com/urban_studies_masters Recommended Citation Feigenbaum, Jamie S., "The aB gel Economy: What An Iconic Urban Food Can Teach Us About Immigrant Life in New York City, 1880-1910" (2013). Urban Studies Masters Theses. Paper 9. This is brought to you for free and open access by the Urban Studies at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Studies Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BAGEL ECONOMY: What An Iconic Urban Food Can Teach Us About Immigrant Life in New York City, 1880-1910 By Jamie S. Feigenbaum B.S., Cornell University, 2009 M.A., Fordham University, 2011 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE URBAN STUDIES PROGRAM AT FORDHAM UNIVERSITY NEW YORK APRIL 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page ……………………………………… 1 Table of Contents ……………………………… 2 Preface ………………………………………… 3 Introduction …………………………………… 6 Chapter 1: Bagels in the Basement …………… 30 Chapter 2: Bagel Bakers and Policy Makers....... 47 Chapter 3: The Bagel Community as a Whole… 65 Conclusion …………………………………...... 81 Bibliography Abstract Vita 2 Preface This project grew out of two of my interests: informal economies in the urban environment and breakfast foods. As an avid and discerning bagel consumer, I originally devised a study that would reveal, once and for all, if the water used to make New York bagels was really the distinct characteristic that made New York bagels different from other bagels.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Major Initiatives on Workforce Development Present Recommendations — Independent Yet Aligned—For Next Mayor on Job Creation and Re-Structuring
    Four Major Initiatives on Workforce Development Present Recommendations — Independent Yet Aligned—for Next Mayor on Job Creation and Re-Structuring of New York City’s Workforce System (New York, NY—June 25, 2013) — At a meeting last Thursday of the New York City Workforce Investment Board, four workforce development leaders presented recommendations that were independently produced yet significantly aligned on promoting a re-structuring of the city’s workforce development system. The Workforce Investment Board oversees the city’s federally-funded workforce development programs. Each workforce expert highlighted recent progress achieved in partnering with the city, yet all four underscored the need for substantial workforce system reform in order to meet the needs of both jobseekers and employers in New York City. The four experts represented the Partnership for New York City, the New York City Employment & Training Coalition, the Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce and the Re- Envisioning the New York City Workforce System Strategy Group. Each has issued a report with specific recommendations for the next mayor that link the promise of job creation to the challenges and opportunities of the city’s workforce system. “Despite looking at this issue from a variety of points of view, it’s very telling that the collective opinion is the same – the workforce development system in New York City needs to be completely restructured,” said Merrill Pond, Senior Vice President, Partnership for New York City. “The city’s business community is committed to ensuring that New Yorkers are not left behind in our ever evolving economy. Expanded economic opportunity starts with teaching the proper skills and training for the jobs not only of today, but also tomorrow.” In April, the Partnership released NYC Jobs Blueprint, outlining a set of recommendations for collaborative actions that the public and private sectors might take to insure that the New York remains a strong, inclusive city of opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility, Economic Opportunity and New York City Neighborhoods
    Mobility, Economic Opportunity and New York City Neighborhoods Sarah M. Kaufman, Mitchell L. Moss, Jorge Hernandez and Justin Tyndall Updated November 2015 with support from Mobililty, Economic Opportunity and New York City Neighborhoods This report was prepared with the assistance of Richard Dunks, Emily Rhodes, Ashley Smith and Jenny O’Connell. The staff of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Department of Transportation and Riders Alliance made valuable comments and suggestions. The accompanying map on the NYU Rudin Center’s website (www.NYURudinCenter.com) was created by Jeff Ferzoco (linepointpath) and Richard Dunks (Datapolitan). This research was carried out with the support of the Rockefeller Foundation and Google. The Rudin Center for Transportation at the NYU Wagner School aims to strengthen our understanding of all modes of transportation through research, public forums, and educational programs. The Center draws upon faculty, students, and visiting scholars at NYU. Current areas of inquiry include: § The flow of people, goods and information in and through New York City § Information technology and transportation systems § Inequality and access to employment § Urban bike share systems § The future of supercommuting The Rudin Center was named in recognition of a gift from civic leader Lewis Rudin and receives support from leading firms in transportation, finance, and communications. The director of the Center is Mitchell L. Moss, Henry Hart Rice Professor of Urban Policy and Planning. 295 LAFAYETTE STREET
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Elizabeth A. Roistacher Department of Economics Queens College, CUNY Flushing, NY 11367 (718)997-5453 [email protected]
    CURRICULUM VITAE Elizabeth A. Roistacher Department of Economics Queens College, CUNY Flushing, NY 11367 (718)997-5453 [email protected] PRESENT POSITION: Professor (since 1988) Department of Economics Queens College and the Graduate Center City University of New York (member of the Queens College faculty since 1974) Teaching fields: microeconomics; urban economics; urban public finance; housing economics and public policy, political economy of New York City (for CUNY Honors College) EDUCATION: B.A. in Mathematics, University of Pennsylvania, 1966, cum laude Phi Beta Kappa 1966 Ph.D. in Economics, University of Pennsylvania, 1972 N.D.E.A. Fellowship, 1966-69 PREVIOUS PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS/ACTIVITIES: 1994-2001 Director, Office of Honors and Scholarships, Queens College 1979-81 Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Affairs (Chief Economist) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Washington, D.C. (on leave from Queens College) 1977-78 Brookings Economic Policy Fellow U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Washington, D.C. 20410 (on leave from Queens College) 1972-74 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, and Study Director, Institute for Social Research University of Michigan, Ann Arbor OTHER PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: 1987-90 Public Member, Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board 1 1986-87 Research Director, Subcommittee on Housing New York State Governor's Council on Fiscal and Economic Priorities (released time from Queens College) 1985-88 Committee on New York City Social Science Research Council 1983-84 Advisor to the Mayor's Commission on Property Tax Incentives for Industrial and Commercial Development City of New York 1981-6 Editorial Board, Land Economics 1978-81 Editorial Board, Evaluation Quarterly FELLOWSHIPS: 1992-93 American Council on Education Fellowship Sarah Lawrence College 1982 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Queens: Economic Development and the State of the Borough Economuy
    Queens: Economic Development and the State of the Borough Economy June 2006 Report 3-2007 New York State Office of the State Deputy Comptroller Office of the State Comptroller for the City of New York Alan G. Hevesi Kenneth B. Bleiwas Additional copies of this report may be obtained from: Office of the State Comptroller New York City Public Information Office 633 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017 Telephone: (212) 681-4824 Or through the Comptroller’s website at: www.osc.state.ny.us To help reduce printing costs, please notify the Office of the State Deputy Comptroller at (212) 383-3916 if you wish to have your name removed from our mailing list or if your address has changed. Contents I. Executive Summary.......................................................................................... 1 II. Background ....................................................................................................... 3 History............................................................................................................................3 Population and Demographics .......................................................................................5 Commuting Patterns.......................................................................................................7 Housing..........................................................................................................................7 Cultural and Recreational Resources.............................................................................9 Crime............................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • S Trateg Ic P Lan 2 0 0 8 Andbeyond
    S uStainable StreetS: Strategic Plan 2008 and beyond Sustainable Streets Safety Mobility Strategic Plan World Class Streets for the New York City Infrastructure Greening Department of Global Leadership Customer Service Transportation www.nyc.gov/dot 2008 and Beyond CONTENTS 2 Letter from the Mayor 3 Letter from Commissioner 4 Introduction 7 Safety 13 Mobility 19 World Class Streets 25 Infrastructure 31 Greening 37 Global Leadership 43 Customer Service 48 DOT Overview 49 Glossary 50 Benchmarks 71 Acknowledgments 1 LETTER fROM ThE MAYOR LETTER fROM ThE COMMISSIONER The Imperative of Sustainability Dear friends: Dear fellow New Yorkers: Last year, our Administration unveiled PlaNYC, our As our city grows, and as clean air and safe streets I am very pleased to share with you this strategic plan That requires new priorities and a more efficient long-term plan for creating a greener, greater New York. become ever more important to residents and for the New York City Department of Transportation, approach to the city’s basic circulatory system—our One of the key elements of PlaNYC, which seeks to businesses, pioneering innovative new transportation which charts ambitious new directions for our city streets. Adding bus service is the quickest way we can manage the city’s growth in ways that promote our policies will be more important than ever. This strategic transportation system. A green approach to build mass transit capacity. But to work for New Yorkers, economy, environment, and quality of life, is transporta- plan will lead us toward more sustainable streets, transportation can make a dramatic contribution to buses need to be able to move quickly in their own tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Une Ville Mondiale : New York New York, a Global City
    Une ville mondiale : New York New York, a global city 1. Cerner la question Cadrage de la question dans la fiche Eduscol : On trouvera des renseignements précieux dans la fiche Eduscol du chapitre à traiter en Terminale ES, L sur les territoires de la mondialisation : Qu’est-ce qu’une ville mondiale ? Quel est son rôle dans l’organisation du monde ? Quels sont les effets de la mondialisation sur son organisation socio-spatiale ? Elle peut être menée autour des axes suivants : le rôle d’impulsion de la ville sur l’organisation du monde : on analyse sa situation dans les réseaux mondiaux afin de montrer qu’elle est un nœud de communications, une place financière internationale, qu’elle accueille des sièges sociaux d’entreprises de rang mondial et qu’elle est en relation avec les autres villes mondiales. D’autres données affineront cette analyse (attractivité des universités, présence d’organismes internationaux...) pour la situer dans la hiérarchie du réseau dont elle fait partie ; les manifestations de sa puissance : lieux emblématiques de ses rôles économique, politique et culturel (le CBD notamment) ; influence sur les régions qui l’entourent et qu’elle irrigue de ses activités; les conséquences socio-spatiales de l’intégration dans la mondialisation : la spécialisation des quartiers et la fragmentation de l’espace urbain, l’augmentation du prix du foncier qui accélère la ségrégation sociale, l’émergence d’une société mondiale mais aussi une évolution vers une dualité sociale séparant les métiers mondialisés du tertiaire banal. Source :http://cache.media.eduscol.education.fr/file/lycee/43/9/LyceeGT_Ressources_ Geo_T_06_Th2_Q2_Territoires_dans_la_mondialisation_213439 En DNL anglais, quelques pistes pour le vocabulaire et les concepts à présenter… Pour le concept de « ville mondiale », il semble important de revenir sur les termes global, globalization, on a global scale, urban network et de rappeler que c’est la sociologue Saskia Sassen (université de Columbia) qui a forgé le concept de global city en publiant son ouvrage de 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson Yards FGEIS
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 5: Socioeconomic Conditions..................................................................5-1 A. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................5-1 1. BACKGROUND/ISSUES ........................................................................................................5-1 2. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS...................................................................................................5-2 a) Residential Displacement ............................................................................................................ 5-2 b) Business and Institutional Displacement ..................................................................................... 5-3 c) Potential Effects on Specific Industries....................................................................................... 5-4 d) Economic Benefits....................................................................................................................... 5-5 e) Corona Yard ................................................................................................................................ 5-8 B. METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................5-8 1. CEQR OVERVIEW...............................................................................................................5-8 2. ANALYSIS FORMAT AND DATA SOURCES ........................................................................5-10
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Effects of Industrial Retention Policy on New York City Neighborhoods a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Archit
    Analyzing the Effects of Industrial Retention Policy on New York City Neighborhoods A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Preservation COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Urban Planning by Benjamin Huff May 2012 Acknowledgements It is difficult to overstate my gratitude to my thesis advisor, Dr. Stacey Sutton. She was extremely patient with me and helped guide my research in the right direction. Her guidance during the formation of my thesis question and her knowledge of the research process was invaluable in helping keep me on track to complete my studies at Columbia. I would like to thank my friends that I have collected over the years, from high school to the present, whose support through this was wonderful. I had missed many birthdays and social engagements due to school commitments, but they have always supported me regardless. I am grateful to my co-workers at the New York City Economic Development Corporation. Working with them my during my time at Columbia has given me many skills and much knowledge in the field of planning that cannot be learned in a classroom. I am indebted for their help with finding out so much about the field I chose to study. Throughout the entire thesis process, I relied heavily on my classmates at Columbia University. To the entire graduating class of Spring 2012, it was a real pleasure being able to spend time and learn from you. I wish nothing but the best for all of you in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Trends&Insights
    INDUSTRY TRENDS & INSIGHTS Exploring New York City's Economic Sectors RETAIL IN NEW YORK CITY | DECEMBER 2013 HIGHLIGHTS P.1 Retail employment in NYC grew 4.1% from 2011-2012 P.2 Discounters and E-commerce are NYC’s fastest growing retail subsectors P.5 Retail rents reached a record $3,000/SF along Fifth Ave. in 2013 P.5 Retail accounts for 15% of all new private sector jobs added in NYC since the recession Center for Economic Transformation RETAIL HAS LONG PLAYED an important role in the economy of New York City. From Ladies’ Mile on Sixth Avenue, which dazzled turn of the century shoppers, to modern day Fifth Avenue, which has been ranked amongst the most expensive shopping streets in the world, to iconic shopping corridors such as Arthur Avenue, Orchard Street, and Queens Boulevard, retail has defined the city’s streetscape and provided a livelihood for countless New Yorkers. In the postwar era, the market shifted as suburban shopping alternatives that included malls, big box stores, power centers, and lifestyle centers drew retail trade to the suburbs. While retail shrank as a share of the economy in New York City, downtown districts in smaller towns vanished altogether. Despite the Great Recession that raged from 2007 to 2009, New York City has experienced a retail renaissance over the last decade. Though the City’s retail industry still lags the U.S. as a whole in terms of its share of total private sector jobs, that gap is narrowing. Riding a tide of population increases, safer streets, and historic levels of employment, the retail industry in New York City added more than 2,300 businesses and 56,000 employees from 2001 to 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of New York University
    The Economic Impact of New York University Final Report January 14, 2015 NYU as an enterprise With revenues of more than $2.6 billion in fiscal year 2013, New York University1 is a major enterprise in its own right – a major employer and a generator of jobs in New York City through its purchases of goods and services and its investments in University facilities. NYU as an employer In the fall of 2012, NYU’s Washington Square Campus and NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering (School of Engineering) employed 15,775 people, including 9,367 full-time and 6,408 part-time employees. In addition to the University’s regular full- and part-time employees, 5,305 student workers were employed by NYU in the fall of 2012. In fiscal year 2013, salaries and wages paid to NYU employees (including students) totaled nearly $987.4 million. As shown in Figure 1, University employment grew by 12.4 percent between fall 2008 and fall 2012. Figure 1: Full- and part-time employment at NYU, fall 2008 – fall 2012 16,000 15,775 15,500 15,074 15,000 14,500 14,338 14,034 14,000 13,641 13,500 13,000 12,500 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 1 New York University can be defined as consisting of three major units: the Washington Square campus, the NYU Langone Medical Center, and NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering. The Washington Square campus includes most of the University’s undergraduate, graduate and professional schools, as well as the School of Professional Studies. The Medical Center includes three hospitals – Tisch Hospital, the Rusk Institute for Rehabilitation and the Hospital for Joint Diseases – as well as the NYU School of Medicine; and NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering, based in Brooklyn, is the University’s engineering school.
    [Show full text]