Chapter 2: "Atoms and the Atomic Theory"
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nitrogen Isotope Variations in the Solar System Evelyn Füri and Bernard Marty
REVIEW ARTICLE PUBLISHED ONLINE: 15 JUNE 2015 | DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2451 Nitrogen isotope variations in the Solar System Evelyn Füri and Bernard Marty The relative proportion of the two isotopes of nitrogen, 14N and 15N, varies dramatically across the Solar System, despite little variation on Earth. NASA’s Genesis mission directly sampled the solar wind and confirmed that the Sun — and, by inference, the protosolar nebula from which the Solar System formed — is highly depleted in the heavier isotope compared with the reference nitrogen isotopic composition, that of Earth’s atmosphere. In contrast, the inner planets, asteroids, and comets are enriched in 15N by tens to hundreds of per cent; organic matter in primitive meteorites records the highest 15N/14N isotopic ratios. The measurements indicate that the protosolar nebula, inner Solar System, and cometary ices represent three distinct isotopic reservoirs, and that the 15N enrichment generally increases with distance from the Sun. The 15N enrichments were probably not inherited from presolar material, but instead resulted from nitrogen isotope fractionation processes that occurred early in Solar System history. Improvements in analytical techniques and spacecraft observations have made it possible to measure nitrogen isotopic variability in the Solar System at a level of accuracy that offers a window into the processing of early Solar System material, large-scale disk dynamics and planetary formation processes. he Solar System formed when a fraction of a dense molecu- a matter of debate, the D/H isotopic tracer offers the possibility of lar cloud collapsed and a central star, the proto-Sun, started investigating the relationships between the different Solar System Tburning its nuclear fuel1. -
Avogadro Number, Boltzmann Constant, Planck Constant, Information Theory, Comparative and Relative Uncertainties
American Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2018, 8(5): 93-102 DOI: 10.5923/j.ajcam.20180805.02 h, k, NA: Evaluating the Relative Uncertainty of Measurement Boris Menin Mechanical & Refrigeration Consultation Expert, Beer-Sheba, Israel Abstract For verification of the measurement accuracy of fundamental physical constants, the CODATA unique technique is used. This procedure is a complex process based on a careful discussion of the input data, and the justification and construction of tables of values sufficient for the direct use of the relative uncertainty are conducted using modern advanced statistical methods and powerful computers. However, at every stage of data processing, researchers must rely on common sense, that is, an expert conclusion. In this article, the author proposes a theoretical and informational grounded justification for calculating the relative uncertainty by using the comparative uncertainty. A detailed description of the data and the processing procedures do not require considerable time. Examples of measurements results of three fundamental constants are analysed, applying information-oriented approach. Comparison of the achieved relative and comparative uncertainties is introduced and discussed. Keywords Avogadro number, Boltzmann constant, Planck constant, Information theory, Comparative and relative uncertainties theories of physics can be proved by carefully studying the 1. Introduction numerical values of these constants, determined from different experiments in different fields of physics. It is expected that in 2018 that the International System of One needs to note the main feature of the CODATA Units (SI) will be redefined on the basis of certain values of technique in determining the relative uncertainty of one some fundamental constants [1]. -
Element Builder
Name: ______________________________________ Date: ________________________ Student Exploration: Element Builder Prior Knowledge Questions (Do these BEFORE using the Gizmo.) 1. What are some of the different substances that make up a pizza? _____________________ _________________________________________________________________________ 2. What substances make up water? _____________________________________________ 3. What substances make up an iron pot? _________________________________________ Elements are pure substances that are made up of one kind of atom. Pizza is not an element because it is a mixture of many substances. Water is a pure substance, but it contains two kinds of atom: oxygen and hydrogen. Iron is an element because it is composed of one kind of atom. Gizmo Warm-up Atoms are tiny particles of matter that are made up of three particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. The Element Builder Gizmo™ shows an atom with a single proton. The proton is located in the center of the atom, called the nucleus. 1. Use the arrow buttons ( ) to add protons, neutrons, and electrons to the atom. Press Play ( ). A. Which particles are located in the nucleus? _________________________________ B. Which particles orbit around the nucleus? __________________________________ 2. Turn on Show element name. What is the element? ________________________ 3. Manipulate the gizmo to figure out what actions cause the element name to change. _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ Get the Gizmo ready: Activity A: Use the arrows to create an atom with two protons, Subatomic two neutrons, and two electrons. particles Turn on Show element name. Question: What are the properties of protons, neutrons, and electrons? 1. Observe: Turn on Show element symbol and Element notation. Three numbers surround the element symbol: the mass number, electrical charge (no number is displayed if the atom is neutral), and the atomic number. -
Chemistry 2100 In-Class Test 1(A)
NAME:____________________________ Student Number:______________________ Fall 2019 Chemistry 1000 Midterm #1B ____/ 65 marks INSTRUCTIONS: 1) Please read over the test carefully before beginning. You should have 5 pages of questions and a formula/periodic table sheet. 2) If your work is not legible, it will be given a mark of zero. 3) Marks will be deducted for incorrect information added to an otherwise correct answer. 4) Marks will be deducted for improper use of significant figures and for missing or incorrect units. 5) Show your work for all calculations. Answers without supporting calculations will not be given full credit. 6) You may use a calculator. 7) You have 90 minutes to complete this test. Confidentiality Agreement: I agree not to discuss (or in any other way divulge) the contents of this test until after 8:00pm Mountain Time on Thursday, October 10th, 2019. I understand that breaking this agreement would constitute academic misconduct, a serious offense with serious consequences. The minimum punishment would be a mark of 0/65 on this exam and removal of the “overwrite midterm mark with final exam mark” option for my grade in this course; the maximum punishment would include expulsion from this university. Signature: ___________________________ Date: _____________________________ Course: CHEM 1000 (General Chemistry I) Semester: Fall 2019 The University of Lethbridge Question Breakdown Spelling matters! Q1 / 4 Fluorine = F Fluorene = C13H10 Q2 / 4 Q3 / 6 Q4 / 4 Q5 / 6 Flourine = Q6 / 3 Q7 / 2 Q8 / 10 Q9 / 10 Q10 / 3 Q11 / 8 Q12 / 5 Total / 65 NAME:____________________________ Student Number:______________________ 1. Complete the following table. -
X-Ray Crystal Density Method to Determine the Avogadro and Planck Constants
X-ray Crystal Density Method to Determine the Avogadro and Planck Constants Horst Bettin Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig, Germany Proposed New Definition of the Kilogram The kilogram, symbol kg, is the SI unit of mass. It is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the Planck constant h to be 6.626 070 040 x 10 -34 when expressed in the unit J s, which is equal to kg m2 s-1, where the metre and the second c ∆ν are defined in terms of and Cs . *) X represents one or more digits to be added at the time the new definition is finally adopted. α 2 - = M (e )c NAh 2 R∞ N h −10 A = 3.990 312 7110(18) × 10 Js/mol, Amedeo Avogadro Max Planck with relative uncertainty of 0.45 × 10 -9 (1776-1856) (1858-1947) Page 2 of 19 Avogadro Constant Definition of Avogadro constant NA • Number of molecules per mol • 6.022... x 10 23 mol -1 Amedeo Avogadro Current definition of mol (1776-1856) • Number “entities” like 12 C atoms in 12 g • i. e. 6.022... x 10 23 12 C atoms have a mass of 12 g 12 12 g/mol = NA m( C ) Faraday constant F = NA e (e: elementary charge) Molar gas constant R = NA k (k: Boltzmann constant) Page 3 of 19 Counting Atoms: XRCD Method 3 Use of a silicon crystal! 1. Volume a0 of the unit cell 3 2. Volume of an atom: a0 /8 3. Volume V of a sphere 4. Number N of the atoms 8 V8 VM N = = ⋅ mol A N 3 3 a0 a0msphere Page 4 of 19 Lattice parameter measurement (INRIM) d220 (2011)=192014712.67(67) am d220 (2014)=192014711.98(34) am -9 ur(2014) = 1.8 x 10 Page 5 of 19 Lattice parameter set-up at PTB S M1 M M2 AL AA OH Page 6 of 19 Sphere Interferometer of PTB mK-temperature stabilisation Camera 1 Camera 2 Fizeau- Fizeau- Collimator Objective 1 Objective 2 Diode laser Page 7 of 19 Diameter results (2014) Relative Mean apparent Sphere Lab. -
Groundwater Quality Data for the Northern Sacramento Valley, 2007: Results from the California GAMA Program
Prepared in cooperation with the California State Water Resources Control Board A product of the California Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment (GAMA) Program Groundwater Quality Data for the Northern Sacramento Valley, 2007: Results from the California GAMA Program SHASTA CO Redding 5 Red Bluff TEHAMA CO Data Series 452 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover Photographs: Top: View looking down the fence line, 2008. (Photograph taken by Michael Wright, U.S. Geological Survey.) Bottom: A well/pump in a field, 2008. (Photograph taken by George Bennett, U.S. Geological Survey.) Groundwater Quality Data for the Northern Sacramento Valley, 2007: Results from the California GAMA Program By Peter A. Bennett, George L. Bennett V, and Kenneth Belitz In cooperation with the California State Water Resources Control Board Data Series 452 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2009 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. -
Lithium Isotope Fractionation During Uptake by Gibbsite
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 168 (2015) 133–150 www.elsevier.com/locate/gca Lithium isotope fractionation during uptake by gibbsite Josh Wimpenny a,⇑, Christopher A. Colla a, Ping Yu b, Qing-Zhu Yin a, James R. Rustad a, William H. Casey a,c a Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States b The Keck NMR Facility, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States c Department of Chemistry, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States Received 5 November 2014; accepted in revised form 8 July 2015; available online 15 July 2015 Abstract The intercalation of lithium from solution into the six-membered l2-oxo rings on the basal planes of gibbsite is well-constrained chemically. The product is a lithiated layered-double hydroxide solid that forms via in situ phase change. The reaction has well established kinetics and is associated with a distinct swelling of the gibbsite as counter ions enter the interlayer to balance the charge of lithiation. Lithium reacts to fill a fixed and well identifiable crystallographic site and has no solvation waters. Our lithium-isotope data shows that 6Li is favored during this intercalation and that the À À solid-solution fractionation depends on temperature, electrolyte concentration and counter ion identity (whether Cl ,NO3 À or ClO4 ). We find that the amount of isotopic fractionation between solid and solution (DLisolid-solution) varies with the amount of lithium taken up into the gibbsite structure, which itself depends upon the extent of conversion and also varies À À À with electrolyte concentration and in the counter ion in the order: ClO4 <NO3 <Cl . -
UNIT 1 SUMMARY MATTER – Anything That Has Mass and Takes up Space
UNIT 1 SUMMARY MATTER – Anything that has mass and takes up space Other examples? PARTICLE – a single atom or groups of atoms that are bonded together and function as one unit Matter is found in phases or states: GAS • Indefinite shape and volume • Straight-line motion LIQUID • Indefinite shape, definite volume • Rolling motion SOLID • Definite shape and volume • Vibrating motion TYPES OF MATTER PURE SUBSTANCE – Matter where all the particles are identical He NaCl C12H22O11 There are two types of pure substances: ELEMENT • Made from only one type of atom • Cannot be broken into simpler substances by chemical means • Found on the Periodic Table Other examples? Gold Sulfur Helium Sodium COMPOUND • Made from two or more atoms joined together by chemical bonds • Can be broken down into simpler substances by chemical means (by breaking chemical bonds) Water Salt Sugar Other examples? Water Compound ↓ electricity Hydrogen and Oxygen ↓ electricity ↓ electricity Hydrogen and Oxygen Elements Salt Compound ↓ electricity Sodium and Chlorine ↓ electricity ↓ electricity Sodium and Chlorine Elements In CHEMICAL SEPARATION METHODS (e.g. electrolysis), chemical bonds are broken and/or formed. MIXTURE – Matter with different types of particles (elements and/or compounds) There are two types of mixtures: HETEROGENEOUS – Has distinct parts with different properties HOMOGENEOUS – Has same properties throughout (uniform composition) Air Jell-O Steel Brass SOLUTION – A homogenous mixture CLASSIFICATION OF MATTER CHANGES IN MATTER PHYSICAL CHANGE – One that -
12 Natural Isotopes of Elements Other Than H, C, O
12 NATURAL ISOTOPES OF ELEMENTS OTHER THAN H, C, O In this chapter we are dealing with the less common applications of natural isotopes. Our discussions will be restricted to their origin and isotopic abundances and the main characteristics. Only brief indications are given about possible applications. More details are presented in the other volumes of this series. A few isotopes are mentioned only briefly, as they are of little relevance to water studies. Based on their half-life, the isotopes concerned can be subdivided: 1) stable isotopes of some elements (He, Li, B, N, S, Cl), of which the abundance variations point to certain geochemical and hydrogeological processes, and which can be applied as tracers in the hydrological systems, 2) radioactive isotopes with half-lives exceeding the age of the universe (232Th, 235U, 238U), 3) radioactive isotopes with shorter half-lives, mainly daughter nuclides of the previous catagory of isotopes, 4) radioactive isotopes with shorter half-lives that are of cosmogenic origin, i.e. that are being produced in the atmosphere by interactions of cosmic radiation particles with atmospheric molecules (7Be, 10Be, 26Al, 32Si, 36Cl, 36Ar, 39Ar, 81Kr, 85Kr, 129I) (Lal and Peters, 1967). The isotopes can also be distinguished by their chemical characteristics: 1) the isotopes of noble gases (He, Ar, Kr) play an important role, because of their solubility in water and because of their chemically inert and thus conservative character. Table 12.1 gives the solubility values in water (data from Benson and Krause, 1976); the table also contains the atmospheric concentrations (Andrews, 1992: error in his Eq.4, where Ti/(T1) should read (Ti/T)1); 2) another category consists of the isotopes of elements that are only slightly soluble and have very low concentrations in water under moderate conditions (Be, Al). -
Chapter 2 Atoms, Molecules and Ions
Chapter 2 Atoms, Molecules and Ions PRACTICING SKILLS Atoms:Their Composition and Structure 1. Fundamental Particles Protons Electrons Neutrons Electrical Charges +1 -1 0 Present in nucleus Yes No Yes Least Massive 1.007 u 0.00055 u 1.007 u 3. Isotopic symbol for: 27 (a) Mg (at. no. 12) with 15 neutrons : 27 12 Mg 48 (b) Ti (at. no. 22) with 26 neutrons : 48 22 Ti 62 (c) Zn (at. no. 30) with 32 neutrons : 62 30 Zn The mass number represents the SUM of the protons + neutrons in the nucleus of an atom. The atomic number represents the # of protons, so (atomic no. + # neutrons)=mass number 5. substance protons neutrons electrons (a) magnesium-24 12 12 12 (b) tin-119 50 69 50 (c) thorium-232 90 142 90 (d) carbon-13 6 7 6 (e) copper-63 29 34 29 (f) bismuth-205 83 122 83 Note that the number of protons and electrons are equal for any neutral atom. The number of protons is always equal to the atomic number. The mass number equals the sum of the numbers of protons and neutrons. Isotopes 7. Isotopes of cobalt (atomic number 27) with 30, 31, and 33 neutrons: 57 58 60 would have symbols of 27 Co , 27 Co , and 27 Co respectively. Chapter 2 Atoms, Molecules and Ions Isotope Abundance and Atomic Mass 9. Thallium has two stable isotopes 203 Tl and 205 Tl. The more abundant isotope is:___?___ The atomic weight of thallium is 204.4 u. The fact that this weight is closer to 205 than 203 indicates that the 205 isotope is the more abundant isotope. -
2 Weighing and Preparation of Aqueous Solutions
2 WEIGHING AND PREPARATION OF AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS Theory In chemistry, a solution is a homogeneous mixture composed of two or more substances. In such a mixture, a solute is dissolved in another substance, known as a solvent. An aqueous solution is a solution in which the solvent is water. Concentration is the measure of how much of a given substance (solute) there is mixed with another substance (solvent). This can apply to any sort of chemical mixture, but most frequently the concept is limited to homogeneous solutions, where it refers to the amount of solute in a solution. For scientific or technical applications, concentration is expressed in a quantitative way. There are a number of different ways to quantitatively express concentration; the most common are listed below. They are based on mass or volume or both. Depending on what they are based on it is not always trivial to convert one measure to the other, because knowledge of the density might be needed to do so. At times this information may not be available, particularly if the temperature varies. Mass can be determined at a precision of ~ 0.1 mg on a routine basis with an analytical balance. Both solids and liquids are easily quantified by weighing. Some units of concentration - particularly the most popular one (molarity) - require to express the mass of substance in the moles. The mol is the SI basic unit that measures an amount of substance. „One mole contains exactly 6.022 140 76 × 1023 elementary entities. This number is the −1 fixed numerical value of the Avogadro constant, NA, when expressed in the unit mol and is called the Avogadro number.“ The previous definition was based on the number of carbon atoms in 12 g of material and was the following; a mol is the amount of substance of a system which contains as many elementary entities as there are atoms in 0.012 kilogram (or 12 g) of carbon-12 (12C), where the carbon – 12 atoms are unbound, at rest and in their ground state. -
Understanding the Astrophysical Origin of Silver, Palladium and Other Neutron-Capture Elements
Understanding the astrophysical origin of silver, palladium and other neutron-capture elements Camilla Juul Hansen M¨unchen 2010 Understanding the astrophysical origin of silver, palladium and other neutron-capture elements Camilla Juul Hansen Dissertation an der Fakult¨at f¨ur Physik der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universit¨at M¨unchen vorgelegt von Camilla Juul Hansen aus Lillehammer, Norwegen M¨unchen, den 20/12/2010 Erstgutachter: Achim Weiss Zweitgutachter: Joseph Mohr Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung: 22 M¨arz 2011 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Evolutionoftheformationprocesses . ..... 2 1.2 Neutron-capture processes: The historical perspective............ 5 1.3 Features and description of the neutron-capture processes.......... 7 1.4 Whatisknownfromobservations? . .. 9 1.5 Why study palladium and silver? . .. 15 1.6 Abiggerpicture................................. 16 2 Data - Sample and Data Reduction 19 2.1 Compositionofthesample . 19 2.1.1 Samplebiases .............................. 21 2.2 Datareduction ................................. 22 2.2.1 Fromrawtoreducedspectra. 22 2.2.2 IRAF versus UVES pipeline . 25 2.3 Merging ..................................... 26 2.3.1 Radialvelocityshift .......................... 27 3 Stellar Parameters 29 3.1 Methods for determining stellar parameters . ........ 29 3.2 Temperature................................... 30 3.2.1 Comparingtemperaturescales . 32 3.3 Gravity ..................................... 34 3.4 Metallicity.................................... 35 3.5 Microturbulence velocity, ξ ..........................