DOCSLIB.ORG

Buckley Street Essendon Preliminary Options Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Buckley Street Essendon Preliminary Options Assessment Buckley Street, Essendon Preliminary options assessment November 2016 Florence St Grise Cres Mt Alexander Rd Raleigh St Pascoe Vale Rd Miller St Napier St Movement around Understanding the local area the area Elder Parade Lincoln Rd LXRA has undertaken studies Rose St When removing the Local schools and traders Fletcher St to identify how pedestrians, Flower St Buckley Street level crossing, Washington St ROUTE 59 TRAM In October 2016, we began speaking cyclists and vehicles use the area. Daisy St we have the opportunity to with local schools to better understand McPhail St The studies showed: Violet St improve the local precinct how students access their school. Royal Hotel and renew the area. • the level crossing carries Buckley St Understanding the way students, 15,000 vehicles per day Essendon Mt Alexander Rd We want to fully understand how customers and parents move through Station • there are 10 different bus each design option will benefit or the area at different times of the day services that connect with impact the area. To do this we want allows us to integrate feedback into the Nicholson St Essendon Station Buckley St the local community and people design and ensure that traffic is not only Forbes St Hoddle St Scott St Russell St travelling through the area to share reduced, but passes through the area • approximately 2,000 Waverley St as efficiently and safely as possible. people a day connect with St John's with us what is important to Loemanthem. St Robb St St Columba’s College Sherbourne St Cliff St Clarinda Rd Uniting Church Essendon Station by bus Mt Alexander Rd Buckley St • approximately 1,600 Lorraine St people a day connect with Essendon Station by car Buckley St • approximately 800 people a day connect with Essendon Station by tram Levien St • many local streets will experience lower traffic Leslie Rd volumes as drivers will no longer avoid the boom gates after their removal, Hutcheson St also leading to improved travel times into the CBD. Improving the local area Making Melbourne’s roads and While you wait As part of the project, we are identifying opportunities to rail safer, and less congested enhance the surrounding More than 15,000 area. These development vehicles cross opportunities will revitalise The Victorian Government to remove the level crossing and Buckley Street level the precinct and provide crossing each day is removing 50 dangerous have identified a preferred option. significant economic and social benefits to the wider community. and congested level The project has been working with Boom gates are key stakeholders, including Moonee We will provide better connections crossings, including at 78min down for an average Valley City Council, Public Transport to assist with possible developments Buckley Street, Essendon. of 78 minutes in Victoria, and local traders. Heritage that could include: the weekday peak Removing the level crossing at Now we're asking the broader between 7am – 9am Essendon Railway Station is accessed and how it interfaces with • cafes or wine bars Buckley Street, will improve community to provide feedback considered to be the most other transport, including bus safety, reduce congestion and • residential developments on the project designs and how representative example of the services and tram route 59. provide the opportunity to More than 30,000 we can transform and renew Federation Free style designed train • retail opportunities transform the local precinct. train passengers use the surrounding area. stations which was constructed • open spaces. Essendon station The Essendon Railway Station Currently, these boom gates are between 1909 and 1922, and Further information can be every week Complex is listed on the We want to hear more from the down for an average of 78 minutes demonstrates the expansion of found at our website: community about how locals use between 7am and 9am on weekdays. Melbourne and settlement of the Victorian Heritage Register due levelcrossings.vic.gov.au suburbs early in the 1900s. the Buckley Street precinct and An average of 190 to its architectural, aesthetic, The Level Crossing Removal or by contacting our project 190 how we can revitalise this area trains travel this social and historical significance Authority (LXRA) have investigated team on 1800 762 667. While LXRA will preserve the station for retail and residential growth. line each day a number of design options as part of this project, we will to the State of Victoria. investigate opportunities to improve its facilities, the way the station is Project benefits The Buckley Street Level Crossing Removal Project will deliver significant benefits to those who live and travel along the Craigieburn line: Improved safety Pedestrians and cyclists will no longer have to cross the busy and congested Buckley Street to get to and from Essendon Station, including many students at local schools. Boosting the economy By creating hundreds of jobs during construction, and improving opportunities for local traders. Understanding the Better connected different options Options ruled out Why no tunnel option? Maintaining the communities The project team has not pursued third track along There are many examples of these Rail bridge over existing road There are a number of a tunnel solution, as the rail track By removing the level crossing designs across Melbourne, and Essendon Station and providing opportunities factors to consider when This option has been ruled out due can only incline and decline on a all over the world. Public Transport Victoria (PTV) for better travel, we will create selecting a design for to a mix of challenges, including gradient of two per cent (meaning on are undertaking network rail better access to local shopping We will continue to undertake a extensive land acquisition and the a 100m length of track, it can only a level crossing removal. upgrade works across Melbourne, areas and schools. range of assessments to remove major work that would be required be raised or lowered by two metres). The most common ways to the level crossing, including: on the railway at Park Street and and as part of these works, they Considering this option would remove a crossing include: Mount Alexander Road. will be upgrading the third track Improved travel times • traffic, pedestrian and require a long tunnel entrance on at Essendon Station. • lowering the rail line under cyclist studies a gentle slope. This would require By allowing major east-west Road bridge over existing rail the road (rail under road) • precinct studies substantial property acquisition at This track will utilise Platform 1, connections for people coming • building a rail bridge This would require constructing a large the tunnel entrance and exit. currently not in use. The upgrade from Keilor, vehicle movements • geotechnical investigations over the road (rail over road) Buckley Street road bridge over the work will extend this platform to will be improved through the • hydrology assessments existing rail line and has also been Appropriate ventilation requirements allow for next-generation trains. area by diverting traffic from • lowering the road under along the tunnel can be intrusive in • utilities investigations ruled out, due to technical constraints. local streets. the rail line (road under rail) residential areas. From a construction • building a road bridge over • environmental studies Due to the hilly nature of Buckley perspective, such works could take the rail (road over rail). • flora and fauna investigations Street, this solution would require the up to five years. construction of a large bridge structure Please tell us what’s Other options include realigning • disability and access compliance along Buckley Street. This would make Also, the purchasing and manufacturing important to you – have roads and crossing points to • cultural and European connections complicated and potentially of custom built tunnelling equipment that is required to undertake the we missed anything? improve traffic flow and local heritage investigations. unsafe at Mount Alexander Road, and connections, and partially lowering also create significant visual issues drilling works can take over 12 months the road and raising the rail line, along Buckley Street. to obtain. known as a hybrid solution. Approved Windy Hill Future development Cricket Club development Essendon St John's What are Train Station Uniting Church the design Rose Street options for Russell Street the Buckley Street level crossing? We have investigated a number of options for removing the Buckley Street level crossing. Buckley Street While we have not finalised a final solution, based on our current assessments we have a preferred option that avoids private land acquisition, and improves traffic flow through and around the area. Option 1 (preferred option) Lowering Buckley Street beneath the existing rail line, with the rail line remaining at its current level. Benefits: • minimises rail shutdown times during construction and minimum • no acquisition of private property inconvenience to commuters • additional lane for local traffic • safe and local connectivity • opportunity to transform the for traffic and pedestrians Essendon Activity Centre and • shortest construction period local precinct, creating a required, meaning less connected transport hub and disruption to the community revitalised community area • pedestrians and school 5.5m • no impact to heritage students will not have to Rose Street Russell Street station precinct cross a major arterial road. • improvements to station facilities and connections Challenges: • removes arterial traffic that • some right turns into local Buckley Street service road Buckley Street service road currently diverts into local streets would be removed Footpath to Rose Street Buckley Street underpass to Russell Street Footpath streets to avoid the level crossing • ability to cross over Buckley Street would be reduced. We also considered four other options which are detailed below These options have significant challenges with property acquisition impact to the heritage precinct. Option 2 (ruled out) Raising the rail line onto a rail bridge Rail Over with Rail Over with over Buckley Street.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table Talk Page 1 May 2007, Number 178 RRP $2.95 ISSN 1038-3697
    May 2007, Number 178 RRP $2.95 ISSN 1038-3697 Table Talk Page 1 Table Talk is published monthly by the Australian Association of Timetable Collectors Inc. [Registration No: A0043673H] as a journal of record covering recent news items. The AATTC also publishes The Times covering historic and general items. Editor: Steven Haby, PO Box 1072 Newport, VIC, 3015 – (03) 9399 4049, [email protected] Editorial Team: Geoff Mann (Associate Editor), Graeme Cleak, Lourie Smit. Production: Geoff and Judy Lambert, Chris London Secretary: Steven Haby, PO Box 1072 Newport, VIC, 3015 – (03) 9399 4049, [email protected] AATTC on the web: www.aattc.org.au Original material appearing in Table Talk may be reproduced in other publications, acknowledgement is required. Membership of the AATTC includes monthly copies of The Times, Table Talk, the distribution list of TTs and the twice-yearly auction catalogue. The membership fee is $50.00 pa. Membership enquiries should be directed to the Membership Officer: Dennis McLean, 7 Masjakin Court, MURRUMBA DOWNS Qld 4503, - (07) 3886 4204. Feature Timetable (front cover) Extract from the new Surfside Buslines (Gold Coast) Route 748 timetable – see item below. News Gold Coast Region service change summary table - effective Saturday, 24 March 2007 route and weekend route change new description timetable 3 24 March 2007 • more Sunday and public holidays services (Oxenford to • Sunday and public holiday timetable will Southport) duplicate Saturday timetable • improved frequency and geographical coverage of
    [Show full text]
  • City of Moonee Valley Storm and Flood Emergency Plan
    City of Moonee Valley Storm and Flood Emergency Plan A Sub-Plan of the Municipal Emergency Management Plan For City of Moonee Valley And VICSES Unit(s) Essendon Version 6.1 “Intentionally Blank”. Moonee Valley Storm and Flood Emergency Plan – A Sub-Plan of the MEMPlan - ii - Table of Contents DISTRIBUTION LIST .......................................................................................................................... VI DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL FORM / AMENDMENT CERTIFICATE ............................................ VII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS .................................................................................... VIII PART 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 MUNICIPAL ENDORSEMENT ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 THE MUNICIPALITY .................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THIS STORM AND FLOOD EMERGENCY PLAN ..................................... 2 1.4 MUNICIPAL STORM AND FLOOD PLANNING COMMITTEE (MSFPC) ............................................ 2 1.5 RESPONSIBILITY FOR PLANNING, REVIEW AND MAINTENANCE OF THIS PLAN ............................. 2 1.6 ENDORSEMENT OF THE PLAN .................................................................................................. 2 PART 2. PREVENTION / PREPAREDNESS ARRANGEMENTS .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Getting the West on Track: Closing Major Bike Infrastructure Gaps In
    GETTING THE WEST ON TRACK Closing Major Bike Infrastructure Gaps in Melbourne’s Inner West Office of Colleen Hartland MLC Victorian Greens MP for the Western Metropolitan Region GETTING THE WEST ON TRACK Closing Major Bike Infrastructure Gaps in Melbourne’s Inner West NOVEMBER 2015 Report prepared by Lisa Sulinski Intern (RMIT student in Master of Social Work) for Office of Colleen Hartland Victorian Greens MP for the Western Metropolitan Region Photos: Stephanie Wulf, Jonathon Marsden, Lisa Sulinski Maps: OpenStreetMap CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. PROJECT METHODOLOGY 4 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Scope of project 4 2.3 Notes on terminology 5 3. BACKGROUND AND POLICY CONTEXT 6 3.1 Existing cycling network and legislative framework 6 3.2 Cyclist safety 7 3.3 Public health versus cost 9 4. PRIORITY ROUTE SUMMARY 11 5. HOBSONS BAY 11 5.1 Federation Trail to Bay Trail, Spotswood 12 5.2 Douglas Parade crossing, The Punt, Spotswood 14 5.3 Hall Street and Market Street Path, Newport to Spotswood 15 5.4 Kororoit Creek Trail final stage, Altona 21 5.5 Millers Road to Federation Trail intersection at Westgate Freeway 23 6. MARIBYRNONG 29 6.1 Federation Trail missing link through Yarraville 29 6.2 Dynon-Road-Hopkins Street link, Footscray 34 6.3 Napier Street, Footscray 36 6.4 Pilgrim Street-Geelong Road connection, Seddon - West Footscray 38 6.5 Footscray to Highpoint North-South link, Footscray – Maribyrnong 43 7. MOONEE VALLEY 51 7.1 Craigieburn Railway Line route, Buckley Street to Racecourse Road 51 7.2 East West links 53 7.3 Mount Alexander Road separated lanes, Essendon-Moonee Ponds Junction 55 7.4 Mount Alexander Road to Moonee Ponds Creek detour, Moonee Ponds 62 7.5 Moonee Ponds Creek path lighting and directional signage 66 REFERENCES 68 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight and Passenger Transport in Australia
    Final report Who Moves What Where Freight and Passenger Transport in Australia Final Report August 2016 Who Moves What Where – 2 Freight and Passenger Transport in Australia Report outline Title Who Moves What Where - Freight and Passenger Transport in Australia Type of report Information paper Purpose For public information Abstract ‘Who Moves What Where’ is a NTC initiative designed to better inform future planning and policy development by filling gaps in information on passenger and freight movement in Australia. This report provides a vital quantitative component of the ‘Who Moves What Where’ project by reviewing existing data sources and reports. It answers specific questions related to the movement of freight and passengers on Australia’s road and rail networks, including a high-level analysis of the networks, operators and transport task. Key words Road Network, Rail Network, Passenger Task, Freight Task Contact National Transport Commission Level 15/628 Bourke Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia Ph: +61 (03) 9236 5000 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ntc.gov.au ISBN 978-1-921604-96-6 Final report 3 Contents Executive Summary 14 Context 14 Operators 14 Networks 14 Freight task 15 Passenger task 15 Information gaps 16 Chapter 1: Introduction 17 1.1 Objectives 17 1.2 Who Moves What Where 17 1.3 Study approach 18 1.3.1 Scope 18 1.3.2 Methodology 18 1.3.3 Data sources 18 1.3.4 Report structure 18 1.3.5 Next steps 19 Chapter 2: Overview 20 2.1 The national transport task 20 2.2 Growth of the national transport task 21 2.3 Doubling
    [Show full text]
  • Freight and Passenger Transport in Australia
    Final report Who Moves What Where Freight and Passenger Transport in Australia Final Report August 2016 Who Moves What Where – 2 Freight and Passenger Transport in Australia Report outline Title Who Moves What Where - Freight and Passenger Transport in Australia Type of report Information paper Purpose For public information Abstract ‘Who Moves What Where’ is a NTC initiative designed to better inform future planning and policy development by filling gaps in information on passenger and freight movement in Australia. This report provides a vital quantitative component of the ‘Who Moves What Where’ project by reviewing existing data sources and reports. It answers specific questions related to the movement of freight and passengers on Australia’s road and rail networks, including a high-level analysis of the networks, operators and transport task. Key words Road Network, Rail Network, Passenger Task, Freight Task Contact National Transport Commission Level 15/628 Bourke Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia Ph: +61 (03) 9236 5000 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ntc.gov.au ISBN 978-1-921604-96-6 Final report 3 Contents Executive Summary 14 Context 14 Operators 14 Networks 14 Freight task 15 Passenger task 15 Information gaps 16 Chapter 1: Introduction 17 1.1 Objectives 17 1.2 Who Moves What Where 17 1.3 Study approach 18 1.3.1 Scope 18 1.3.2 Methodology 18 1.3.3 Data sources 18 1.3.4 Report structure 18 1.3.5 Next steps 19 Chapter 2: Overview 20 2.1 The national transport task 20 2.2 Growth of the national transport task 21 2.3 Doubling
    [Show full text]
  • 4 September 2013 (Extract from Book 11)
    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FIFTY-SEVENTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION Wednesday, 4 September 2013 (Extract from book 11) Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor The Honourable ALEX CHERNOV, AC, QC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable Justice MARILYN WARREN, AC The ministry (from 22 April 2013) Premier, Minister for Regional Cities and Minister for Racing .......... The Hon. D. V. Napthine, MP Deputy Premier, Minister for State Development, and Minister for Regional and Rural Development ................................ The Hon. P. J. Ryan, MP Treasurer ....................................................... The Hon. M. A. O’Brien, MP Minister for Innovation, Services and Small Business, Minister for Tourism and Major Events, and Minister for Employment and Trade .. The Hon. Louise Asher, MP Attorney-General, Minister for Finance and Minister for Industrial Relations ..................................................... The Hon. R. W. Clark, MP Minister for Health and Minister for Ageing .......................... The Hon. D. M. Davis, MLC Minister for Sport and Recreation, and Minister for Veterans’ Affairs .... The Hon. H. F. Delahunty, MP Minister for Education ............................................ The Hon. M. F. Dixon, MP Minister for Planning ............................................. The Hon. M. J. Guy, MLC Minister for Higher Education and Skills, and Minister responsible for the Teaching Profession
    [Show full text]
  • Roads, Inexperience, and Other Factors
    FOREWORD It is not uncommon for local authorities to aspire to build strong, healthy communities. There are three things that distinguish Mildura Rural City Council’s ambitions in this regard and which provide grounds for confidence that it will be especially successful in its endeavours. They are: (i) the integration of community development planning with a range of local government functions rather than positioning community concerns as an abstract pursuit on the margins of ‘real’ local government business; (ii) the creation of planning bodies that bring together community stakeholders and local government to identify regional strengths and deficiencies and to plan remedial action where needed; and (iii) using systematically gathered data, to guide the choice of community priorities and community strengthening activities and to monitor progress in achieving community objectives. The present publication testifies to the seriousness of Council’s commitment to basing its social planning on tangible evidence. In 2006 Mildura Social Indicators presented data on the general profile of the region, the presence of different forms of social distress, health problems and strengths, community safety, the structure of the regional economy, the educational progress of young people and qualifications of adults, and the use made of cultural repositories (essentially the Art Gallery and local libraries). The picture that emerged from that data review has assisted in the region’s dealings with other levels of government and has attracted the interest of other regional councils, particularly in Victoria. More importantly, the data has encouraged discussion between different local organisations and branches of government services leading to a range of new, collaborative community initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Moonee Valley City Council Public Consultation Submission
    Moonee Valley City Council Public Consultation Submission: Draft Melbourne Industrial and Commercial Land Use Plan December 2019 Draft Melbourne Industrial and Commercial Land Use Plan Moonee Valley City Council officers welcome the opportunity to provide comment on the Draft Melbourne Industrial and Commercial Land Use Plan (Draft Plan). Officers have reviewed the Draft Plan and are pleased to make this submission. Please find below a number of comments and suggestions for your consideration. Approach to Planning for Industrial and Commercial Land Similar to at the State level, Moonee Valley experiences challenges due to population growth and associated demand for industrial and commercial space to support this growth. Moonee Valley comprises one area of Regionally Significant Industrial Land at Airport West and five reasonably small pockets of Local Industrial Land throughout its municipality (See Figure 1 below). Commercial areas and the Commercial 1 Zone (C1Z) are largely focused across its seven Major Activity Centres (see Figure 2 below). The small pockets of industrial land remaining in Moonee Valley perhaps reflect Melbourne’s economy transitioning away from traditional manufacturing towards one focussed on the production and delivery of services. Moonee Valley values its remaining industrial land and the diverse source of business and employment activity they provide. Moonee Valleys long term strategic vision, MV2040, calls for reinvigorating industrial areas such as Airport West where viable. There is a need to ensure that strategic planning for industrial areas is robust and appropriate and does not reduce viability for industry and commerce. Council welcomes therefore, state guidance in the form of this Draft Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Book 2 28, 29 February and 1 March 2012
    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FIFTY-SEVENTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION Book 2 28, 29 February and 1 March 2012 Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor The Honourable ALEX CHERNOV, AC, QC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable Justice MARILYN WARREN, AC The ministry Premier and Minister for the Arts................................... The Hon. E. N. Baillieu, MP Deputy Premier, Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for Bushfire Response, and Minister for Regional and Rural Development.................................................. The Hon. P. J. Ryan, MP Treasurer........................................................ The Hon. K. A. Wells, MP Minister for Innovation, Services and Small Business, and Minister for Tourism and Major Events...................................... The Hon. Louise Asher, MP Attorney-General and Minister for Finance........................... The Hon. R. W. Clark, MP Minister for Employment and Industrial Relations, and Minister for Manufacturing, Exports and Trade ............................... The Hon. R. A. G. Dalla-Riva, MLC Minister for Health and Minister for Ageing.......................... The Hon. D. M. Davis, MLC Minister for Sport and Recreation, and Minister for Veterans’ Affairs . The Hon. H. F. Delahunty, MP Minister for Education............................................ The Hon. M. F. Dixon, MP Minister for Planning............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reimagining the Workforce: the Victorian Rolling Stock Context Literature Review
    Reimagining the workforce: the Victorian rolling stock context Literature review ISILC INSTITUTE OF SUSTAINABLE INDUSTRIES AND LIVEABLE CITIES All material in this document, except as identified below, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Licence. Material not licensed under the Creative Commons licence: • Victoria University logo • Any other logos • All photographs, graphics and figures. All content not licenced under the Creative Commons licence is all rights reserved. Permission must be sought from the copyright owner to use this material. Disclaimer: Victoria University advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, Victoria University (including its employees and consultants) exclude all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. This paper represents the opinions (findings, and conclusions or recommendations) of the authors, and is the product of professional research. It is not meant to represent
    [Show full text]
  • North Western Program Alliance Annual Sustainability Report 2019
    NORTH WESTERN PROGRAM ALLIANCE Annual Sustainability Report MAY 2020 levelcrossings.vic.gov.au Authorised and published by the Victorian Government, 1 Treasury Place, Melbourne ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Alliance acknowledges the Wurundjeri and the Boon Wurrung people of the Kulin Nation who are the traditional owners of the land on which we work. The Alliance would like to pay its respect to the Elders past, present and emerging of this great land. Source: The artworks utilised were prepared by the Narrun Yana Art Collective, young artists Rubii Red, Nakia Cadd and Graham ‘BJ’ Braybon displayed their work at Reservoir temporary station CONTENTS Message from Rob Cranston 6 About this Report 8 NWPA Sustainability Highlights 9 About LXRP 10 About the Alliance 12 Our Commitment to Sustainability 14 Measuring Sustainability Performance 15 Environmental Sustainability 26 Our Workforce 34 Major Achievements to Date 35 Urban Design 40 Our Community 44 Innovations and Initiatives 48 What’s next 52 MESSAGE FROM ROB CRANSTON Alliance General Manager The North Western Program Alliance (NWPA or the Alliance) is working with Level Crossing Removal Project to deliver on the Level Crossing Removal Program’s (LXRP) commitment to remove 75 of the most dangerous level crossings across metropolitan Melbourne by 2025. As one of five Alliance’s established social and economic outcomes converted into successful outcomes. to deliver the works, NWPA has across all phases of the level crossing We seek to consistently develop design successfully removed four level removal process in order to deliver solutions to minimise our carbon crossings and constructed two an integrated project that connects footprint, materials consumption premium stations in just two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Flemington Hill and Epsom Road Advisory Committee
    Planning and Environment Act 1987 Advisory Committee Stage 4 Report Flemington Hill and Epsom Road Advisory Committee 3 June 2016 Planning and Environment Act 1987 Advisory Committee Stage 4 Report Flemington Hill and Epsom Road Advisory Committee Stage 4: Outcomes 3 June 2016 Kathy Mitchell, Chair Des Grogan, Member Jim Holdsworth, Member Flemington Hill and Epsom Road Advisory Committee Stage 4 Report 3 June 2016 Contents Page Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 1 Part A: Background .............................................................................................................. 6 1 Overview .................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Advisory Committee and Terms of Reference ........................................................ 7 1.2 Consultation and process ........................................................................................ 7 1.3 Advisory Committee’s Stage 1 Report .................................................................... 9 1.4 Exhibition and hearings ......................................................................................... 10 1.5 Site inspections ...................................................................................................... 12 1.6 Committee approach to this Report ..................................................................... 13 2 The proposals ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]