DOCSLIB.ORG

What One Lutheran Would Like the Orthodox to Know

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What One Lutheran Would Like the Orthodox to Know INTERSECTIONS What One Lutheran Would Like the Orthodox to Know Robert Saler Between 1576 and 1581, Ecumeni- the mainstream of Orthodox theology cal Patriarch Jeremiah II engaged in at the time, and the absence of formal substantive epistolary dialogue with definition may have lured the Luther- Lutherans of the Tübingen School of ans into thinking that monergism was emerging Lutheran scholasticism. In somehow acceptable to the Orthodox. some ways it would be correct to say Furthermore, the absence of a formal that, prior to the inauguration of the magisterium may have led the Luther- contemporary ecumenical movement, ans to believe that a more individual- it was the most significant point of ized scriptural hermeneutic would be theological contact between Lutheran- welcome in Orthodox circles. To the ism proper and the Orthodox Church. extent that these assumptions were Operating largely under the principle present, they were mistaken. of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” the Lutherans sought to de- It is probably fair to say that, while the termine if the opposition to key doc- Lutherans had a fairly clear sense of trines and magisterial structures of the differences between Roman Cath- Roman Catholicism shared between olics and Orthodox on matters of con- the nascent Protestant movements troversy between the Lutherans and and the Eastern church could some- the Catholics, they underestimated how form a theological bond between the deeper differences in ecclesial and the two communions. theological frameworks between East and West. It was an outreach some- While the exchanges were pleasant what charming in its naivety, and the enough, their historical impact was dialogues did not progress past the negligible. Jeremiah affirmed the Lu- exchange of a few theological treatises.1 therans’ condemnation of what he took to be Roman Catholic innova- As global Christian communities— 1 See Augsburg and tions but he had limited sympathy for Protestant and otherwise—contin- Constantinople: their retention of Western theologi- ue to think about the impact of the The Correspondence cal structures or for the characteristic fragmentation of the churches in the between the Tubin- gen Theologians and Lutheran understanding of salvation West, The Wheel asked if I would re- Patriarch Jeremiah II of as monergistic (that is, the idea that flect upon the contemporary signifi- Constantinople on the God alone is the actor in salvation; cance of this historical exchange from Augsburg Confession, human free will and good works play a contemporary Lutheran theological ed. George Mastran- no part). The exact mechanics of the perspective. I feel the best way to do tonis (Brookline, MA: Holy Cross soteriological synergism between that would be in the form of a missive Orthodox Press, faith and works may have differed be- of my own, as a Lutheran who has the 1982). tween medieval Roman Catholics and privilege of deep friendship with Or- 86 thodox Christians around the globe. While Luther rejected Roman Catholic © 2018 The Wheel. The following are things that I would formulations of the transubstantiation May be distributed for noncommercial use. like my Orthodox friends to hear from of the Eucharistic elements, this was www.wheeljournal.com the mouth of one Lutheran—one who solely because he thought it an un- cannot speak for all Lutherans every- wise imposition of Aristotelian philo- where, obviously, but who sees some sophical categories upon what should deep coherence between the life of properly remain a mystery. And in- faith as lived in a Lutheran key and in deed, Luther regularly compared that an Eastern Orthodox one (even as the mystery to the mystery of the incarna- differences remain real and worthy of tion. Rather than render the effects of discussion): consecration in terms of the categories of substance and accident, one should 1. While sectarian triumphalism is regard it in the same manner as the a problem in some Lutheran circles, homoouios doctrine: a genuine incar- the more fundamental Lutheran im- national mystery that ultimately tran- pulse today is toward ecumenism and scends philosophical categories. the healing of old wounds. For instance, the entirety of the Lutheran World 3. We understand Christ to be truly and Federation’s commemorations (not bodily present in the Eucharist and are celebrations, but commemorations) somewhat puzzled theologically at of the five hundredth anniversary of why we don’t share the Eucharist the Reformation were planned in col- with other bodies (including Roman laboration with the Vatican. Whereas Catholics and Orthodox) who believe Lutheranism used to be defined by the same. To be fair, we understand its oppositional stance towards oth- why history has divided us, but we er traditions (Catholic and Protestant reject the theological division (which alike), mainline Lutheranism in the is why Lutherans of the Evangelical United States and Europe is now more Lutheran Church in America or ELCA accurately described as ecumenical in welcome baptized Christians who be- its bearing. lieve in the real presence to the table, whether they are Lutheran or not). I 2. Lutherans affirm Nicene/Chalcedonian find Peter Bouteneff’s image of “fast- Christology against the classical heresies, ing” from Eucharist together to be and we appreciate the Orthodox for very helpful in helping think through continuing to show us what that looks the lack of a common table, but I do like. Much contemporary Protestant question what such division means theology, under the influence of pro- about the God who is the host of the cess theology and nineteenth-century table, as opposed to human steward- liberalism, has backed away from full ship of the divine mysteries. affirmation of thehomoousios, whereas the Lutheran tradition as a whole— 4. While Luther’s respect for the Theot- particularly in its sacramental theol- okos was grounded in her humanity, ogy—has strongly affirmed the coex- and Lutherans hold to this against the istence of Christ’s full humanity and excesses of Marian devotion claimed divinity. by our Roman Catholic friends, we un- derstand our regard for Mary to be no less Unlike our Reformed friends, we af- deep than that of Catholics and Orthodox firm the bodily presence of Christ as (theologically speaking, although per- ubiquitous throughout creation, in- haps not sociologically). The shifting cluding in the consecrated elements. fate of Mary within Protestantism is a The Wheel 15 | Fall 2018 87 long, complex story that would have ginity), she seems quite far away from to include so many fraught moments. even the most tradition-friendly Prot- Martin Luther saw Mary in her hu- estant piety. But when it is as a broken, manity as a crucial protagonist of fragile human who took the incredible the story of humanity’s redemption. risk of saying yes to a God whom she Through her obedience to God’s call surely could not have understood at as an unwed, scared teenage wom- that moment, or in so many moments an, God brought salvation out of that along the way, she is very close to Lu- which was unimpressive. According- theran sensibilities. And to the extent ly, Luther regularly defended her title that Orthodoxy also rejects the super- “Theotokos” against Nestorian ten- fluous additions to Marian doctrine dencies and he personally believed in characteristic of Roman Catholicism, her perpetual virginity, although be- Orthodox veneration of the Theotokos lief in the latter is not mandated by the and Lutheran love for her might co- Lutheran Confessions. But subsequent here in powerful ways. Lutheranism, and other Protestant movements, in a frenzy to distinguish 5. In my estimation, where soteriol- their piety from Roman Catholicism, ogy is concerned, the major difference gradually identified Marian devotion between Lutherans and Orthodox has to with idolatry and went overboard in do with the sequencing of salvation and denigrating her standing. 2 love for neighbor. Lutherans tend not to talk about the ascetic struggle for sal- This distinction was of course exacer- vation because, in Luther’s view, con- bated when Marian devotion became fidence in our own salvation frees us tied up with controversies over papal to be more concerned about the needs infallibility, with undisputed ex cathe- of the neighbor than that of our own. dra papal pronouncements related to By contrast, on my reading of Ortho- Marian dogma. The fall of Mary with- dox theology, love and service toward in Protestantism coincided with the the neighbor form the key element in rise of the domestic ideal of the fam- salvation (theosis). ily in European and North American Protestantism especially. Instead of As articulated in his 1520 treatise The Marian feasts, we have Mother’s Day Freedom of a Christian, Luther thought as a new liturgical ground zero of pi- that proclaiming salvation by grace ous vocation. Many Protestants who through faith apart from works freed ordain women hold that Marian devo- us to focus our attention on the neigh- tion often functions as a way of “pro- bor’s need. While Lutherans insist on moting women sideways”: honoring a monergistic understandings of God’s specific woman in her vocation so as agency in salvation and the Orthodox to undercut the possibility that wom- favor a synergistic or co-operative ap- en might move into other vocations, proach (emphasizing humanity’s free such as the priesthood. cooperation with grace), the upshot of both is a life lived in confidence 2 See Beth Kreitzer, Reforming Mary: When Marian devotion is presented of God’s mercy and with an orienta- Changing Images of to Protestants laden with what most tion towards the neighbor. These two the Virgin Mary in of us would take to be distracting su- models of soteriology lead to a simi- Lutheran Sermons of per-additions to her humanity (and lar shape of Christian life.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Translation of German Pietist Imagery Into Anglo-American Cultures
    Copyright by Ingrid Goggan Lelos 2009 The Dissertation Committee for Ingrid Goggan Lelos Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Spirit in the Flesh: The Translation of German Pietist Imagery into Anglo-American Cultures Committee: Katherine Arens, Supervisor Julie Sievers, Co-Supervisor Sandy Straubhaar Janet Swaffar Marjorie Woods The Spirit in the Flesh: The Translation of German Pietist Imagery into Anglo-American Cultures by Ingrid Goggan Lelos, B.A.; M.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2009 Dedication for my parents, who inspired intellectual curiosity, for my husband, who nurtured my curiositities, and for my children, who daily renew my curiosities Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to so many who made this project possible. First, I must thank Katie Arens, who always believed in me and faithfully guided me through this journey across centuries and great geographic expanses. It is truly rare to find a dissertation advisor with the expertise and interest to direct a project that begins in medieval Europe and ends in antebellum America. Without her belief in the study of hymns as literature and the convergence of religious and secular discourses this project and its contributions to scholarship would have remained but vague, unarticulated musings. Without Julie Sievers, this project would not have its sharpness of focus or foreground so clearly its scholarly merits, which she so graciously identified.
    [Show full text]
  • HT504 HISTORY of CHRISTIANITY II Summer Semester 2010 Reformed Theological Seminary Orlando, FL Dr
    HT504 HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITY II Summer Semester 2010 Reformed Theological Seminary Orlando, FL Dr. W. Andrew Hoffecker The purpose of the course is to study Christian church history from the Protestant Reformation to the present. The course will be multifaceted and will include: the development of Christian theology such as the theologies of Luther, Calvin, Schleiermacher, and Barth; the institutional church; various views of the religious life including pietism and Puritanism; and prominent movements (e.g., Protestant scholasticism, modern liberalism and Neo Orthodoxy) and individuals who inspired them. Our aim, therefore, is not to limit our study to “church history” alone, but always as it is related to other fields in the history of Christian thought and the larger culture. By surveying diverse but related subjects, students will gain an overall historical perspective of the Church – its theology, institutions, and leaders during the last five centuries. Throughout our study the advantages of an integrated perspective will be stressed. The major benefits of this approach will be an increased appreciation of God's providential work throughout its history and insights into important issues of our own era. A principal interest will be to understand how people and ideas influenced the church of the past, and how they still affect contemporary events. COURSE REQUIREMENTS 1. TEXTS: The following texts are required for the course: Justo Gonzalez, The Story of Christianity: Vol 2 The Reformation to the Present Day; Hugh T. Kerr, Readings in Christian Thought. Students will read Gonzalez in its entirety; Kerr, pages 136-403. Students will also complete additional pages of reading which will be reported on the day of the final exam on the “READING REPORT FOR HT504” attached to this syllabus.
    [Show full text]
  • J. J. Rambach and the Dogmatics of Scholastic Pietism Richard A
    Consensus Volume 16 Article 2 Issue 2 Lutheran Pietism 11-1-1990 J. J. Rambach and the dogmatics of scholastic pietism Richard A. Muller Follow this and additional works at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/consensus Recommended Citation Muller, Richard A. (1990) "J. J. Rambach and the dogmatics of scholastic pietism," Consensus: Vol. 16 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/consensus/vol16/iss2/2 This Articles is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consensus by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. J.J. Rambach and the Dogmatics of Scholastic Pietism Richard A. Muller Associate Professor of Historical Theology, Fuller Theological Seminary The Pietist movement of the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries reacted powerfully against the dogma- tism of late Protestant Orthodoxy. Spener and those who fol- lowed him protested loudly against the dry, rigid formulae of Lutheran scholasticism and against the reduction of religion to the acceptance of a system of carefully defined theological propositions. This is certainly the standard view of the re- lationship between Pietism and Orthodoxy, and it contains, undeniably, an element of truth. ^ Orthodox Protestantism did tend to debate the finest points of doctrine and to assume that deviation from the orthodox position even on secondary issues was tantamount to an attack on fundamental doctrines—and Orthodoxy could, all too often, appear to equate acceptance of a detailed confessional statement with right religion. Against this historical truism, however, several writers have argued the piety of the Orthodox Lutheran theologians and have noted the emphasis of Orthodox Lutheran dogmatics on the Christian life.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Not Cite Without Express Permission of the Author PRINCETON
    PRINCETON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY NOVA LINGUA DEI: THE PROBLEM OF CHALCEDONIAN METAPHYSICS AND THE PROMISE OF THE GENUS TAPEINOTICON IN LUTHER’S LATER THEOLOGY IN FULFILLMENT OF THE PH.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION IN THE HISTORY OF DOCTRINE DAVID W. CONGDON JANUARY 12, 2011 Do not cite without express permission of the author Congdon 1 INTRODUCTION Scholars have long noted that Luther makes a decisive contribution to the debate over divine impassibility. That he speaks of God’s suffering and death is well-attested in the literature. The question is the precise nature of this provocative language. It is widely acknowledged that Luther’s theology exhibits a radicalization of the communicatio idiomatum: the properties of divinity and humanity are not merely communicated to the one person, but they are also shared, at least in some respect, between the natures. In one direction (from divine to human), the result is the genus maiestaticum (“genus of majesty”), employed by Lutherans within the eucharistic debates as the basis for Christ’s bodily ubiquity. This paper will instead focus on the communication in the other direction (human to divine), known as the genus tapeinoticon (“genus of humility”; from the Greek, ταπεινωσις).1 While scholars such as Paul Althaus and Marc Lienhard have mentioned this concept with respect to Luther’s christology,2 the notion of a genus tapeinoticon remains controversial and raises a number of complicated questions regarding the relation of Luther to the orthodox tradition associated with the Council of Chalcedon. There is a continual danger of reading the modern acceptance of divine passibility 1 “The phrase genus tapeinoticum .
    [Show full text]
  • Lutheran Tradition: Five Continuing Themes Walter R
    Intersections Volume 1997 | Number 2 Article 4 1997 Lutheran Tradition: Five Continuing Themes Walter R. Bouman Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/intersections Augustana Digital Commons Citation Bouman, Walter R. (1997) "Lutheran Tradition: Five Continuing Themes," Intersections: Vol. 1997: No. 2, Article 4. Available at: http://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/intersections/vol1997/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Augustana Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Intersections by an authorized administrator of Augustana Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LUTHERAN TRADITION: FIVE CONTINUING THEMES Walter R. Bouman Lutherans are "a decent, humble people," says Garrison places where all threse arguments are -- or ought to be -­ Keillor, the Lutheran church's best knownapologete. And vigorously taking place. they may have much to be humble about. In the USA, Lutherans are in themiddle of the middle class, withlower I. The LutheranTr adition is Biblical average incomes than Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and members of the United Church of Christ, higher average Martin Luther (1463-1546) was a monumental figure in incomes than Baptists, Pentecostals, and members of Westernhistory, larger than lifein his own life-time. He is holiness churches. Only 12% of Lutherans are college of great importance to theLutheran tradition, but he is not graduates(compared with 34% forEpiscopalians), but they the founderof a religious institution in thesense in which, have a high respectfor college education. 1 My assignment forexample, Mary Baker Eddy is thefounder of the Church is to describe the Lutheran theological tradition forcollege of Christ, Scientist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Classical Greek Philosophy in Early Lutheranism
    The Use of Classical Greek Philosophy in Early Lutheranism Jordan Cooper and Dan Lioy Abstract This article is an examination of the use of classical philosophy in Keywords the Lutheran tradition from Martin Luther through Johann Metaphysics Lutheran scholasticism Gerhard. It focuses particularly on the essentialist philosophies of Faith and reason both Plato and Aristotle as used and modified in these Lutheran Philosophy and theology Prolegomena. writers. The claim made in this article is that though critical of 1 Aristotelian thought on certain points, the first generations of About the Authors Jordan Cooper Lutheran theologians also incorporated certain aspects of these [Affiliation] philosophies in a positive manner within their theological systems. [Mini-biography] The goal of this article is to demonstrate that such positive Dan Lioy evaluations of certain aspects of both Aristotle and Plato’s PhD (North-West University) philosophies can be found throughout these thinkers, as well as to The Senior Research Manager at the South African Theological demonstrate the usefulness of these categories in the Seminary, Dan has a particular contemporary church. research interest in intertextuality, Biblical ethics and spiritual care in professional settings. 11 The views expressed herein are thosethose ofof thethe authorsauthor and and do do not not necessarilynecessarily representrepresent thethe beliefsbeliefs ofof thethe SouthSouth AfricanAfrican TheologicalTheological Seminary. Conspectus—The Journal of the South African Theological Seminary ISSN 1996-8167 https://www.sats.edu.za/conspectus/ This article: https://www.sats.edu.za/cooper-lioy-classical-greek-philosophy-early- lutheranism Conspectus, Volume 26, September 2018 1 1. Introduction The Lutheran tradition has sometimes had a reputation for being opposed to philosophy, especially in view of the fondness for mystery over syllogistic reasoning that is apparent in Lutheran theological texts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blackwell Companion to Protestantism Blackwell Companions to Religion
    The Blackwell Companion to Protestantism Blackwell Companions to Religion The Blackwell Companions to Religion series presents a collection of the most recent scholarship and knowledge about world religions. Each volume draws together newly commissioned essays by distinguished authors in the field, and is presented in a style which is accessible to undergraduate students, as well as scholars and the interested general reader. These volumes approach the subject in a creative and forward-thinking style, providing a forum in which leading scholars in the field can make their views and research available to a wider audience. Published The Blackwell Companion to Judaism Edited by Jacob Neusner and Alan J. Avery-Peck The Blackwell Companion to Sociology of Religion Edited by Richard K. Fenn The Blackwell Companion to the Hebrew Bible Edited by Leo G. Perdue The Blackwell Companion to Postmodern Theology Edited by Graham Ward The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism Edited by Gavin Flood The Blackwell Companion to Political Theology Edited by Peter Scott and William T. Cavanaugh The Blackwell Companion to Protestantism Edited by Alister E. McGrath and Darren C. Marks The Blackwell Companion to Modern Theology Edited by Gareth Jones The Blackwell Companion to Religious Ethics Edited by William Schweiker The Blackwell Companion to Christian Ethics Edited by Stanley Hauerwas and Sam Wells Forthcoming The Blackwell Companion to the Study of Religion Edited by Robert A. Segal The Blackwell Companion to Eastern Christianity Edited by Ken Parry The Blackwell Companion to Christian Spirituality Edited by Arthur Holder The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament Edited by David Aune The Blackwell Companion to Protestantism Edited by Alister E.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Gospel As Hermeneutic: Martin Luther and the Lutheran Tradition Richard P
    Consensus Volume 9 | Issue 1 Article 1 1-1-1983 Law and gospel as hermeneutic: Martin Luther and the Lutheran tradition Richard P. Hordern Follow this and additional works at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/consensus Recommended Citation Hordern, Richard P. (1983) "Law and gospel as hermeneutic: Martin Luther and the Lutheran tradition," Consensus: Vol. 9 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/consensus/vol9/iss1/1 This Articles is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consensus by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LAW AND GOSPEL AS HERMENEUTIC: MARTIN LUTHER AND THE LUTHERAN TRADITION Richard Hordern The idea of Law and Gospel is found in various Lutheran traditions. It generally refers to the idea that God’s Word is expressed through two different ways of speak- ing. When God speaks Law the message is one of judgment and condemnation over the individual’s failure to live up to the standards of the Law, thus arousing fear and guilt in the individual. This guilt should be destructive of the person’s self security so that the person is then driven, by desperation, to the Gospel. The Gospel is God speaking a word of forgiveness, comfort, or promise. The Law is judgment, in diametrical opposition to the Gospel, which is grace. The Gospel can only be understood, according to a traditional viewpoint, when one first experiences guilt under the Law. The Gospel represents a total release of the person from the accusa- tions of the Law and the guilt is removed by grace through faith alone.
    [Show full text]
  • From Pietism to Paradox: the Development of a Lutheran
    Intersections Volume 2000 | Number 8 Article 5 2000 From Pietism to Paradox: The evelopmeD nt of a Lutheran Philosophy of Education Philip Nordquist Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/intersections Augustana Digital Commons Citation Nordquist, Philip (2000) "From Pietism to Paradox: The eD velopment of a Lutheran Philosophy of Education," Intersections: Vol. 2000: No. 8, Article 5. Available at: http://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/intersections/vol2000/iss8/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Augustana Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Intersections by an authorized administrator of Augustana Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Pietism to Paradox: The Development of a Lutheran Philosophy of Education" Philip Nordquist I became interested in questions related to the much time for questions about Lutheran college identity and educational mission of Lutheran identity. Neither was there encouragement forsuch colleges and universities in the mid 1950s while I questions. Professionalism, specialization, and attended Pacific Lutheran University. I didn't get research talk dominated. What George Marsden much help in my quest from either the institutional calls "methodological secularization" also loomed ethos or from what I read, however. The over the whole enterprise. I didn't discover the institutional ethos was largely composed of the Harold H. Ditmanson, Howard Hong, and Warren Protestant triumphalism that was booming at the Quanbeck edited book The Christian Faith and the time, an aggressive moralism that was orchestrated Liberal Arts (1960) where contributors tried to by the incumbent president, S.C. Eastvold, and a discover whether there was a Lutheran philosophy defensiveness that wanted little or nothing to do of education until later and then decided it was too with the complicated intellectual and moral narrowly focused on the liberal arts and mirrored questions that were being raised leftand right.
    [Show full text]
  • ED362095.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 362 095 HE 026 703 AUTHOR Bunnell, David Paul TITLE The Influence of Pietism on Americcn Higher Education. PUB DATE 24 May 91 NOTE 136p.; Masters Thesis; United Theological Seminary. PUB TYPE Dissertations/Theses Masters Theses (042) Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Colonial History (United States); *Educational History; *European History; *Higher Education; Intellectual History; *Private Colleges; Religious Education; *Religious Factors IDENTIFIERS Harvard University MA; '2ietism; Yale University CT ABSTRACT This master's paper looks at the Pietist movement of German Lutheranism from 1650 to 1750 and its effect on German Universities, the Great Awakening in America, and the founding and early history of important American universities. Pietism was a religious movement that arose from the aftermath of the Thirty Years War in Europe and was particularly concerned with personal piety and general morality. This movement transformed religious life and thinking in Germany and the Low Countries, and the educational ideas of Pietist leaders such as Philip Jacob Spener and August Hermann Francke marked the beginnings of modern German education. The Pietist movement also influenced the American Colonial religious revival movement called the Great Awakening during the mid-170.0's. The leaders of this movement, influenced by Pietist theological, missionary, and educational ideas, founded several important early colleges in the Colonies including Harvard College, Yale College, and the College of New Jersey (Princeton). Thus Pietist ideas on tolerance, academic liberty, personal piety, and the education of the clergy were developed and incorporated into the American higher education system. Their arguments and ideas are important in understanding current issues in American colleges and universities.
    [Show full text]
  • HT504 HISTORY of CHRISTIANITY II Spring Semester 2010 Reformed Theological Seminary Jackson, MS Dr
    HT504 HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITY II Spring Semester 2010 Reformed Theological Seminary Jackson, MS Dr. W. Andrew Hoffecker Emeritus Professor of Church History The purpose of the course is to study Christian church history from the Protestant Reformation to the present. The course will be multifaceted and will include: the development of Christian theology such as the theologies of Luther, Calvin, Schleiermacher, and Barth; the institutional church; various views of the religious life including pietism and Puritanism; and prominent movements (e.g., Protestant scholasticism, modern liberalism and Neo Orthodoxy) and individuals who inspired them. Our aim, therefore, is not to limit our study to “church history” alone, but always as it is related to other fields in the history of Christian thought and the larger culture. By surveying diverse but related subjects, students will gain an overall historical perspective of the Church – its theology, institutions, and leaders during the last five centuries. Throughout our study the advantages of an integrated perspective will be stressed. The major benefits of this approach will be an increased appreciation of God's providential work throughout its history and insights into important issues of our own era. A principal interest will be to understand how people and ideas influenced the church of the past, and how they still affect contemporary events. COURSE REQUIREMENTS 1. TEXTS : The following texts are required for the course: Justo Gonzalez, The Story of Christianity: Vol 2 The Reformation to the Present Day ; Hugh T. Kerr, Readings in Christian Thought. Students will read Gonzalez in its entirety; Kerr, pages 136-403. Students will also complete additional pages of reading which will be reported on the day of the final exam on the “READING REPORT FOR HT504” attached to this syllabus.
    [Show full text]
  • Kant's Political Thought in the Prussian Enlightenment
    Kant’s Political Thought in the Prussian Enlightenment Ian Hunter Introduction This chapter provides an historical account of Immanuel Kant’s political and religious writings by situating them in the context of the Prussian enlightenment. Enlightenment or Aufklärung was the term adopted by protagonists during the eighteenth century to name a series cross-cutting public debates over the reform of Prussia’s religious and political constitution and its social and economic order.1 These debates were centred in Berlin and the small university towns of Halle and Königsberg. They drew their protagonists from the north-German Bildungsbürgertum — the stratum of Protestant university-educated theologians, pastors, bureaucrats, jurists and professors — who communicated via journalism, sermonising and academic disputations, and through interlinking memberships of university faculties, Protestant congregations, Masonic lodges, and private clubs and debating societies. This social and literary network formed the ‘public’ that Kant addressed in his political and religious writings. Given its composition, however, membership of this public was not entirely distinct from or opposed to membership of the state or church, with much depending in this regard on the ‘persona’ adopted by officials and clergy when engaging in the debates. Neither did the shared educational qualification of the Bildungsbürgertum mean that its members were united by a homogenous rational or moral culture — no more than is the tertiary-educated middle class in today’s Western societies. What linked the members of this public was the Protestant intellectual culture transmitted in north-German universities and churches. This is also what divided them, as this culture itself remained fractured by opposed intellectual formations, ethical styles, and political commitments, as we shall below.
    [Show full text]