The Genus Uncinocarpus (Onygenaceae) and Its Synonym

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Genus Uncinocarpus (Onygenaceae) and Its Synonym 1624 The genus Uncinocarpus (Onygenaceae) and its synonym Brunneospora: new concepts, combinations and connections to anamorphs in Chrysosporium, and further evidence of relationship with Coccidioides immitis1 Lynne Sigler, Arlene L. Flis, and J.W. Carmichael Abstract: The genus Uncinocarpus (Onygenales, Onygenaceae) is emended to include keratinophilic fungi with discrete, globose gymnothecial ascomata without differentiated ascomatal hyphae and bearing uncinate, helical, or no appendages; oblate, punctate ascospores sometimes with irregular reticulations; bulbous initials, and Malbranchea or Chrysosporium anamorphs. The new combination Uncinocarpus orissi is proposed for Pseudoarachniotus orissi; Gymnoascus arxii is shown to be a synonym. New records show that the fungus has a wide distribution from North America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. The teleomorph is formed under laboratory conditions by mating representative isolates. The anamorph has been described under the names Chrysosporium zonatum and Chrysosporium gourii. Chrysosporium queenslandicum is morphologically similar. Its teleomorph Apinisia queenslandica is transferred also to the genus Uncinocarpus as Uncinocarpus queenslandicus. Brunneospora reticulata, the type species of the genus Brunneospora, is a synonym. Orromyces spiralis appears to be another name applied to this fungus. Development of helical coils in an isolate of Coccidioides immitis provides further evidence of a possible relationship between this dimorphic human pathogen and this group of ascomycetes. Key words: Uncinocarpus, Onygenales, systematics, keratinophiles, human pathogen. Résumé : Les auteurs amendent le genre Uncinocarpus (Onygénales, Onygénacées) pour y inclure des champignons kératinophiles comportant de petits ascomata gymnothèques globulaires sans hyphes ascomatales différenciées, et portant ou non des appendices uncinés ou hélice, des ascospores ponctuées, aplaties aux pôles, quelquefois avec des réticulations, des (cellules) initiales bulbeuses, et des anamorphes de types Malbranchea ou Chrysosporium. On propose la nouvelle combinaison Uncinocarpus orissi pour remplacer le Pseudoarachniotus orissi; on montre que le Gymnoascus arxii est un synonyme. De nouvelles mentions montrent que ce champignon est largement répandu en Amérique du Nord, en Europe, en Asie et au Moyen-Orient. On obtient la formation du téléomorphe au laboratoire, en croisant des isolats représentatifs. L’anamorphe a été décrit sous les noms de Chrysosporium zonatum et de Chrysoporium gourii. Le Chrysoporium queenslandicum est morphologiquement similaire. On transfère son téléomorphe Apinisia queenslandica également au genre Uncinocarpus devenant l’Uncinocarpus queenslandicus. Le Brunneospora reticulata, espèce type du genre Brunneospora, est un synonyme. Il semble que l’Orromyces spiralis soit un autre nom appliqué à ce champignon. Le développement d’un boudin en hélice chez un isolat du Coccidioides immitis constitue un autre élément de preuve de la relation possible entre ce pathogène humain dimorphe et ce groupe d’ascomycètes. Mots clés : Uncinocarpus, Onygénales, systématique, kératinophyles, pathogène humain. [Traduit par la Rédaction] Received December 18, 1997. L. Sigler2 and A.L. Flis. University of Alberta Microfungus Collection and Herbarium, Devonian Botanic Garden, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada. J.W. Carmichael. S 31, C 4, RR 1, Fanny Bay, BC V0R 1W0, Canada. 1 This paper is dedicated to Dr. Stanley J. Hughes, a collegial and prodigious worker internationally acclaimed as a brilliant systematist whose theories on classification of conidial fungi have influenced scores of other workers. A model to us all, Stan has followed an exem- plary career of 31 years of service and research in Canada and the United Kingdom with several years of dedicated research in retirement. We honor and congratulate him on his 80th birthday. 2 Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: [email protected] Can. J. Bot. 76: 1624–1636 (1998) © 1998 NRC Canada Sigler et al. 1625 Introduction The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship among and between these taxa, to define species concepts, A recent review of the Onygenales (Scott et al. 1993) and to redescribe cultural features We used mating tests to presented a key to 11 genera in which the ascomata possess confirm relationships among our Chrysosporium isolates and uncinate, curved, or helical appendages. The genera Uncino- the ex-type strain of C. zonatum and between them and ex- carpus, Brunneospora, and Apinisia were distinguished in type strains of G. arxii and P. orissi. Neither Gymnoascus nor part by ascospore shape: oblate for Uncinocarpus, ellipsoidal Pseudoarachniotus is suitable for disposition of the teleo- for Brunneospora, and globose for Apinisia. Sigler and Car- morph of C. zonatum. Therefore, it is redisposed here in Unci- michael (1976) described the genus Uncinocarpus for Unci- nocarpus and the genus is emended. nocarpus reesii Sigler & G.F. Orr, a soil fungus having reddish brown, oblate, smooth ascospores that were later Materials and methods shown by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to be orna- mented with small puncta (pits or depressions) (Currah 1985). Studied strains were on deposit at the University of Alberta Micro- Other distinguishing features of U. reesii included heterothal- fungus Collection and Herbarium (UAMH) and included 15 strains lic compatibility, bulbous initials, and discrete globose gym- preliminarily identified as Chrysosporium sp. IX and ex-type strains of C. zonatum (UAMH 6617), Chrysosporium gourii (UAMH 4436), nothecial ascomata composed of a loose network of uncinate P. or iss i (UAMH 6950), G. arxii (UAMH 6611), A. queenslandica appendages. The species also produced a distinctive Mal- (UAMH 4319), and B. reticulata (UAMH 5704). Type material of the branchea anamorph, which had first attracted the attention of latter three species was obtained on loan. mycologists because of morphological and habitat similarities Repeated attempts were necessary to mate available strains with the dimorphic human pathogenic fungus Coccidioides because of low fertility among tested strains. Changes were made to immitis Stiles (Sigler and Carmichael 1976). Recent molecu- growth conditions including medium and temperature and to the lar studies have confirmed a close relationship between these methods of inoculation, using methods described by Sigler (1996). species (Pan et al. 1994; Bowman et al. 1996), but no meiotic Initial experiments used autoclaved garden soil plus autoclaved stage is known for the latter. human hair or horsehair and incubation at room temperature (22– Guarro et al. (1987) introduced the monotypic genus Brun- 25ЊC). Strains were paired in all possible combinations, including self–self pairings. Subsequent experiments used soil extract agar, neospora Guarro & Punsola for a keratinophilic fungus iso- both without and with glucose (recipe in Sigler 1996 but without lated by hair bait of soil samples in Spain. The genus was yeast extract), oatmeal salts agar, or Takashio agar (recipes in Kane et distinguished by globose gymnothecial ascomata with helical al. 1997). All agar media were supplemented with sterile human hair appendages, reddish brown, reticulate, ellipsoidal asco- or horsehair. The latter two media and incubation at 28–30ЊC were spores, and a Chrysosporium anamorph. Brunneospora retic- found to be optimal. Plates were held for 3–6 months before being ulata, the type species, was represented by two collections, of discarded as negative. The first experiment, which included nine which only the type was obtained in axenic culture and it con- strains (2041, 2538, , 3728, 4044, 4426, 4427, 6499, and 6500), sisted mainly of the anamorph. Orromyces spiralis B. Sur & yielded fertile crosses among three pairings (6499 × 6500, 4426 × 4427, and 4427 × 6500). Seven single ascospore isolates were G.R. Ghosh (Ghosh and Sur 1985), known only from the × original description, appears to be similar. obtained from the cross of 4427 6500 and checked for fertility on their own and in backcrossings with the parent strains. Two single Brunneospora was distinguished from the genus Apinisia ascospore isolates (6635 and 9097) were designated as plus mating La Touche (1968) by ascospore shape. However, a second strains and two (6636 and 9098) as minus mating strains and were species, Apinisia queenslandica Apinis & R.G. Rees (1976) used in subsequent mating experiments. Each was nonfertile in self– differs from the type species Apinisia graminicola La Touche self pairings but fertile when backcrossed with one of the parent in ascospore shape and substrate preferences. Previous strains. workers (Currah 1985; Guarro et al. 1991) have suggested For SEM, ascospores were obtained from dried type material and that A. queenslandica be redisposed. There appear to be no fresh cultural material. Ascospores were affixed directly onto Avery records of B. reticulata or A. queenslandica other than from label glue coated onto stubs or onto glue that had been dissolved in the original descriptions, but the anamorph Chrysosporium chloroform. A coating of gold or gold–palladium was applied with an queenslandicum Apinis & R.G. Rees is occasionally listed in Edwards sputter coater (S150B) and specimens were examined and photographed with either a Cambridge S-250 or an Hitachi S-2500 surveys of keratinophilic fungi. SEM. Our interest in the preceding taxa arose from difficulties in Growth studies were conducted
Recommended publications
  • Genome Analysis Reveals Evolutionary Mechanisms of Adaptation in Systemic Dimorphic Fungi 2 3 José F
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/199596; this version posted October 6, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Genome analysis reveals evolutionary mechanisms of adaptation in systemic dimorphic fungi 2 3 José F. Muñoz1, Juan G. McEwen2,3, Oliver K. Clay3,4 , Christina A. Cuomo1* 4 5 1Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States. 6 2 Cellular and Molecular Biology Unit, Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas, Medellín, Colombia. 7 3 School of Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. 8 4 School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia 9 * [email protected] 10 11 Key Words: Dimorphic fungi, comparative genomics, virulence evolution, Ajellomycetaceae 12 13 ABSTRACT 14 Dimorphic fungal pathogens cause a significant human disease burden and unlike most fungal 15 pathogens affect immunocompetent hosts. Most dimorphic fungi are found in the family 16 Ajellomycetaceae, including the genera Histoplasma, Blastomyces, Paracoccidioides, and the recently 17 described Emergomyces. To examine the origin of virulence and host adaptation in these fungal 18 pathogens, we compared the gene content of classic systemic, opportunistic, and non-pathogenic 19 species, including new genomes for Emmonsia species and two closely non-pathogenic species, 20 Helicocarpus griseus and Polytolypa hystricis. We examined differences in gene content between 21 pathogens and environmental fungi, and found that gene families related to plant degradation, 22 synthesis of secondary metabolites, and amino acid and lipid metabolism are retained in H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogeny of Plant and Animal Pathogens in the Ascomycota
    Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology (2001) 59, 165±187 doi:10.1006/pmpp.2001.0355, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on MINI-REVIEW The phylogeny of plant and animal pathogens in the Ascomycota MARY L. BERBEE* Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada (Accepted for publication August 2001) What makes a fungus pathogenic? In this review, phylogenetic inference is used to speculate on the evolution of plant and animal pathogens in the fungal Phylum Ascomycota. A phylogeny is presented using 297 18S ribosomal DNA sequences from GenBank and it is shown that most known plant pathogens are concentrated in four classes in the Ascomycota. Animal pathogens are also concentrated, but in two ascomycete classes that contain few, if any, plant pathogens. Rather than appearing as a constant character of a class, the ability to cause disease in plants and animals was gained and lost repeatedly. The genes that code for some traits involved in pathogenicity or virulence have been cloned and characterized, and so the evolutionary relationships of a few of the genes for enzymes and toxins known to play roles in diseases were explored. In general, these genes are too narrowly distributed and too recent in origin to explain the broad patterns of origin of pathogens. Co-evolution could potentially be part of an explanation for phylogenetic patterns of pathogenesis. Robust phylogenies not only of the fungi, but also of host plants and animals are becoming available, allowing for critical analysis of the nature of co-evolutionary warfare. Host animals, particularly human hosts have had little obvious eect on fungal evolution and most cases of fungal disease in humans appear to represent an evolutionary dead end for the fungus.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Taxa of Thermally Dimorphic Systemic Pathogens in the Ajellomycetaceae (Onygenales)
    This item is the archived peer-reviewed author-version of: Novel taxa of thermally dimorphic systemic pathogens in the Ajellomycetaceae (Onygenales) Reference: Dukik Karolina, Munoz Jose F., Jiang Yanping, Feng Peiying, Sigler Lynne, Stielow J. Benjamin, Freeke Joanna, Jamalian Azadeh, van den Ende Bert Gerrits, McEw en Juan G., ....- Novel taxa of thermally dimorphic systemic pathogens in the Ajellomycetaceae (Onygenales) Mycoses: diagnosis, therapy and prophylaxis of fungal diseases - ISSN 0933-7407 - 60:5(2017), p. 296-309 Full text (Publisher's DOI): https://doi.org/10.1111/MYC.12601 To cite this reference: https://hdl.handle.net/10067/1436700151162165141 Institutional repository IRUA HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Mycoses Manuscript Author . Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2018 January 20. Published in final edited form as: Mycoses. 2017 May ; 60(5): 296–309. doi:10.1111/myc.12601. Novel taxa of thermally dimorphic systemic pathogens in the Ajellomycetaceae (Onygenales) Karolina Dukik1,2,#, Jose F. Muñoz3,4,5,#, Yanping Jiang1,6,*, Peiying Feng1,7, Lynne Sigler8, J. Benjamin Stielow1,9, Joanna Freeke1,9, Azadeh Jamalian1,9, Bert Gerrits van den Ende1, Juan G. McEwen4,10, Oliver K. Clay4,11, Ilan S. Schwartz12,13, Nelesh P. Govender14,15, Tsidiso G. Maphanga15, Christina A. Cuomo3, Leandro Moreno1,2,16, Chris Kenyon14,17, Andrew M. Borman18, and Sybren de Hoog1,2,* 1CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands 2Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Chrysosporium
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Universidade do Minho: RepositoriUM 25 Chrysosporium Dongyou Liu and R.R.M. Paterson contents 25.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 197 25.1.1 Classification and Morphology ............................................................................................................................ 197 25.1.2 Clinical Features .................................................................................................................................................. 198 25.1.3 Diagnosis ............................................................................................................................................................. 199 25.2 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................... 199 25.2.1 Sample Preparation .............................................................................................................................................. 199 25.2.2 Detection Procedures ........................................................................................................................................... 199 25.3 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................................................200
    [Show full text]
  • Aphanoascus Fulvescens (Cooke) Apinis
    The ultimate benchtool for diagnostics. Introduction Introduction of ATLAS Introduction CLINICAL FUNGI Introduction The ultimate benchtool for diagnostics Introduction Introduction Introduction Sample pages Introduction G.S. de Hoog, J. Guarro, J. Gené, S. Ahmed, Introduction A.M.S. Al-Hatmi, M.J. Figueras and R.G. Vitale 1 ATLAS of CLINICAL FUNGI The ultimate benchtool for diagnostics Overview of approximate effective application of comparative techniques in mycology Use Strain Variety Species Genus Family Order Class Keyref Cell wall Tax Kreger & Veenhuis (191) Pore Tax Moore (198) Karyology Tax Takeo & de Hoog (1991) Co- Tax Yamada et al. (198) Carbohydrate pattern Tax eijman & Golubev (198) Classical physiology Tax Yarrow (1998) API 32C Diag Guého et al. (1994b) API-Zym Diag Fromentin et al. (1981) mole% G+C Tax Guého et al. (1992b) SSU seq Tax Gargas et al. (1995) SSU-RFLP Tax Machouart et al. (2006) LSU Diag Kurtzman & Robnett (1998) ITS seq/RFLP Diag Lieckfeldt & Seifert (2000) IGS Epid Diaz & Fell (2000) Tubulin Tax Keeling et al. (2000) Actin Tax Donnelly et al. (1999) Chitin synthase Tax Karuppayil et al. (1996) Elongation factor Diag Helgason et al. (2003) NASBA Tax Compton (1991) nDNA homology Epid Voigt et al. (199) RCA Epid Barr et al. (199) LAMP Tax Guého et al. (199) MLPA Diag Sun et al. (2010) Isoenzymes (MLEE) Epid Pujol et al. (199) Maldi-tof Diag Schrödl et al. (2012) Fish Diag Rigby et al. (2002) RLB Diag Bergmans et al. (2008) PCR-ELISA Diag Beifuss et al. (2011) Secondary metabolites Tax/Diag Frisvad & Samson (2004) SSR Epid Karaoglu et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Coprophilous Fungal Community of Wild Rabbit in a Park of a Hospital (Chile): a Taxonomic Approach
    Boletín Micológico Vol. 21 : 1 - 17 2006 COPROPHILOUS FUNGAL COMMUNITY OF WILD RABBIT IN A PARK OF A HOSPITAL (CHILE): A TAXONOMIC APPROACH (Comunidades fúngicas coprófilas de conejos silvestres en un parque de un Hospital (Chile): un enfoque taxonómico) Eduardo Piontelli, L, Rodrigo Cruz, C & M. Alicia Toro .S.M. Universidad de Valparaíso, Escuela de Medicina Cátedra de micología, Casilla 92 V Valparaíso, Chile. e-mail <eduardo.piontelli@ uv.cl > Key words: Coprophilous microfungi,wild rabbit, hospital zone, Chile. Palabras clave: Microhongos coprófilos, conejos silvestres, zona de hospital, Chile ABSTRACT RESUMEN During year 2005-through 2006 a study on copro- Durante los años 2005-2006 se efectuó un estudio philous fungal communities present in wild rabbit dung de las comunidades fúngicas coprófilos en excementos de was carried out in the park of a regional hospital (V conejos silvestres en un parque de un hospital regional Region, Chile), 21 samples in seven months under two (V Región, Chile), colectándose 21 muestras en 7 meses seasonable periods (cold and warm) being collected. en 2 períodos estacionales (fríos y cálidos). Un total de Sixty species and 44 genera as a total were recorded in 60 especies y 44 géneros fueron detectados en el período the sampling period, 46 species in warm periods and 39 de muestreo, 46 especies en los períodos cálidos y 39 en in the cold ones. Major groups were arranged as follows: los fríos. La distribución de los grandes grupos fue: Zygomycota (11,6 %), Ascomycota (50 %), associated Zygomycota(11,6 %), Ascomycota (50 %), géneros mitos- mitosporic genera (36,8 %) and Basidiomycota (1,6 %).
    [Show full text]
  • A Higher-Level Phylogenetic Classification of the Fungi
    mycological research 111 (2007) 509–547 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mycres A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi David S. HIBBETTa,*, Manfred BINDERa, Joseph F. BISCHOFFb, Meredith BLACKWELLc, Paul F. CANNONd, Ove E. ERIKSSONe, Sabine HUHNDORFf, Timothy JAMESg, Paul M. KIRKd, Robert LU¨ CKINGf, H. THORSTEN LUMBSCHf, Franc¸ois LUTZONIg, P. Brandon MATHENYa, David J. MCLAUGHLINh, Martha J. POWELLi, Scott REDHEAD j, Conrad L. SCHOCHk, Joseph W. SPATAFORAk, Joost A. STALPERSl, Rytas VILGALYSg, M. Catherine AIMEm, Andre´ APTROOTn, Robert BAUERo, Dominik BEGEROWp, Gerald L. BENNYq, Lisa A. CASTLEBURYm, Pedro W. CROUSl, Yu-Cheng DAIr, Walter GAMSl, David M. GEISERs, Gareth W. GRIFFITHt,Ce´cile GUEIDANg, David L. HAWKSWORTHu, Geir HESTMARKv, Kentaro HOSAKAw, Richard A. HUMBERx, Kevin D. HYDEy, Joseph E. IRONSIDEt, Urmas KO˜ LJALGz, Cletus P. KURTZMANaa, Karl-Henrik LARSSONab, Robert LICHTWARDTac, Joyce LONGCOREad, Jolanta MIA˛ DLIKOWSKAg, Andrew MILLERae, Jean-Marc MONCALVOaf, Sharon MOZLEY-STANDRIDGEag, Franz OBERWINKLERo, Erast PARMASTOah, Vale´rie REEBg, Jack D. ROGERSai, Claude ROUXaj, Leif RYVARDENak, Jose´ Paulo SAMPAIOal, Arthur SCHU¨ ßLERam, Junta SUGIYAMAan, R. Greg THORNao, Leif TIBELLap, Wendy A. UNTEREINERaq, Christopher WALKERar, Zheng WANGa, Alex WEIRas, Michael WEISSo, Merlin M. WHITEat, Katarina WINKAe, Yi-Jian YAOau, Ning ZHANGav aBiology Department, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610, USA bNational Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information,
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysosporium Keratinophilum IFM 55160 (AB361656)Biorxiv Preprint 99 Aphanoascus Terreus CBS 504.63 (AJ439443) Doi
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/591503; this version posted April 4, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Characterization of novel Chrysosporium morrisgordonii sp. nov., from bat white-nose syndrome (WNS) affected mines, northeastern United States Tao Zhang1, 2, Ping Ren1, 3, XiaoJiang Li1, Sudha Chaturvedi1, 4*, and Vishnu Chaturvedi1, 4* 1Mycology Laboratory, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA 2 Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, PR China 3Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA 4Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Public Health, University at Albany, Albany, New York, USA *Corresponding authors: Sudha Chaturvedi, [email protected]; Vishnu Chaturvedi, [email protected]. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/591503; this version posted April 4, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Psychrotolerant hyphomycetes including unrecognized taxon are commonly found in bat hibernation sites in Upstate New York. During a mycobiome survey, a new fungal species, Chrysosporium morrisgordonii sp. nov., was isolated from bat White-nose syndrome (WNS) afflicted Graphite mine in Warren County, New York. This taxon was distinguished by its ability to grow at low temperature spectra from 6°C to 25°C. Conidia were tuberculate and thick-walled, globose to subglobose, unicellular, 3.5-4.6 µm ×3.5-4.6 µm, sessile or borne on narrow stalks.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Check-List of Ascomycota Reported from Soil and Other Terricolous Substrates in Egypt A
    Journal of Basic & Applied Mycology 2 (2011): 1-27 1 © 2010 by The Society of Basic & Applied Mycology (EGYPT) An annotated check-list of Ascomycota reported from soil and other terricolous substrates in Egypt A. F. Moustafa* & A. M. Abdel – Azeem Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Suez *Corresponding author: e-mail: Canal, Ismailia 41522, Egypt [email protected] Received 26/6/2010, Accepted 6/4 /2011 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract: By screening of available sources of information, it was possible to figure out a range of 310 taxa that could be representing Egyptian Ascomycota up to the present time. In this treatment, concern was given to ascomycetous fungi of almost all terricolous substrates while phytopathogenic and aquatic forms are not included. According to the scheme proposed by Kirk et al. (2008), reported taxa in Egypt belonged to 88 genera in 31 families, and 11 orders. In view of this scheme, very few numbers of taxa remained without certain taxonomic position (incertae sedis). It is also worthy to be mentioned that among species included in the list, twenty-eight are introduced to the ascosporic mycobiota as novel taxa based on type materials collected from Egyptian habitats. The list includes also 19 species which are considered new records to the general mycobiota of Egypt. When species richness and substrate preference, as important ecological parameters, are considered, it has been noticed that Egyptian Ascomycota shows some interesting features noteworthy to be mentioned. At the substrate level, clay soils, came first by hosting a range of 108 taxa followed by desert soils (60 taxa).
    [Show full text]
  • Sequencing Abstracts Msa Annual Meeting Berkeley, California 7-11 August 2016
    M S A 2 0 1 6 SEQUENCING ABSTRACTS MSA ANNUAL MEETING BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 7-11 AUGUST 2016 MSA Special Addresses Presidential Address Kerry O’Donnell MSA President 2015–2016 Who do you love? Karling Lecture Arturo Casadevall Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Thoughts on virulence, melanin and the rise of mammals Workshops Nomenclature UNITE Student Workshop on Professional Development Abstracts for Symposia, Contributed formats for downloading and using locally or in a Talks, and Poster Sessions arranged by range of applications (e.g. QIIME, Mothur, SCATA). 4. Analysis tools - UNITE provides variety of analysis last name of primary author. Presenting tools including, for example, massBLASTer for author in *bold. blasting hundreds of sequences in one batch, ITSx for detecting and extracting ITS1 and ITS2 regions of ITS 1. UNITE - Unified system for the DNA based sequences from environmental communities, or fungal species linked to the classification ATOSH for assigning your unknown sequences to *Abarenkov, Kessy (1), Kõljalg, Urmas (1,2), SHs. 5. Custom search functions and unique views to Nilsson, R. Henrik (3), Taylor, Andy F. S. (4), fungal barcode sequences - these include extended Larsson, Karl-Hnerik (5), UNITE Community (6) search filters (e.g. source, locality, habitat, traits) for 1.Natural History Museum, University of Tartu, sequences and SHs, interactive maps and graphs, and Vanemuise 46, Tartu 51014; 2.Institute of Ecology views to the largest unidentified sequence clusters and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, Tartu formed by sequences from multiple independent 51005, Estonia; 3.Department of Biological and ecological studies, and for which no metadata Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, currently exists.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Planet Description Sheets: 400–468
    Persoonia 36, 2016: 316– 458 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158516X692185 Fungal Planet description sheets: 400–468 P.W. Crous1,2, M.J. Wingfield3, D.M. Richardson4, J.J. Le Roux4, D. Strasberg5, J. Edwards6, F. Roets7, V. Hubka8, P.W.J. Taylor9, M. Heykoop10, M.P. Martín11, G. Moreno10, D.A. Sutton12, N.P. Wiederhold12, C.W. Barnes13, J.R. Carlavilla10, J. Gené14, A. Giraldo1,2, V. Guarnaccia1, J. Guarro14, M. Hernández-Restrepo1,2, M. Kolařík15, J.L. Manjón10, I.G. Pascoe6, E.S. Popov16, M. Sandoval-Denis14, J.H.C. Woudenberg1, K. Acharya17, A.V. Alexandrova18, P. Alvarado19, R.N. Barbosa20, I.G. Baseia21, R.A. Blanchette22, T. Boekhout3, T.I. Burgess23, J.F. Cano-Lira14, A. Čmoková8, R.A. Dimitrov24, M.Yu. Dyakov18, M. Dueñas11, A.K. Dutta17, F. Esteve- Raventós10, A.G. Fedosova16, J. Fournier25, P. Gamboa26, D.E. Gouliamova27, T. Grebenc28, M. Groenewald1, B. Hanse29, G.E.St.J. Hardy23, B.W. Held22, Ž. Jurjević30, T. Kaewgrajang31, K.P.D. Latha32, L. Lombard1, J.J. Luangsa-ard33, P. Lysková34, N. Mallátová35, P. Manimohan32, A.N. Miller36, M. Mirabolfathy37, O.V. Morozova16, M. Obodai38, N.T. Oliveira20, M.E. Ordóñez39, E.C. Otto22, S. Paloi17, S.W. Peterson40, C. Phosri41, J. Roux3, W.A. Salazar 39, A. Sánchez10, G.A. Sarria42, H.-D. Shin43, B.D.B. Silva21, G.A. Silva20, M.Th. Smith1, C.M. Souza-Motta44, A.M. Stchigel14, M.M. Stoilova-Disheva27, M.A. Sulzbacher 45, M.T. Telleria11, C. Toapanta46, J.M. Traba47, N.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Chrysosporium
    25 Chrysosporium Dongyou Liu and R.R.M. Paterson contents 25.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 197 25.1.1 Classification and Morphology ............................................................................................................................ 197 25.1.2 Clinical Features .................................................................................................................................................. 198 25.1.3 Diagnosis ............................................................................................................................................................. 199 25.2 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................... 199 25.2.1 Sample Preparation .............................................................................................................................................. 199 25.2.2 Detection Procedures ........................................................................................................................................... 199 25.3 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................................................200 References .................................................................................................................................................................................200
    [Show full text]