Ris Software

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ris Software A SUPPLEMENT TO RIS NEWS RIS SOFTWARE LEADERBOARD ‘14 RIS SOFTWARE LEADERBOARD ‘14 • Top 20 Software Leaders • Top Tier One & Mid-Market Vendors • Top Vendors in Grocery, Apparel & Specialty • 51 Charts and BreakOUTS PLUS: COMPANIES TO WATCH RIS SOFTWARE LEADERBOARD ‘14 SECTION EDITOR’S NOTE BY THE NUMBERS 869 Vendor evaluations 373 Retail voters Power of Peer to Peer 238 Voters <$1B in revenue 140 Specialty retail voters Consistency can be boring except when maintaining high standards 135 Voters >$1B in revenue By Joe Skorupa 114 Apparel voters THE MISSION of the RIS Software Lead- Satisfaction scores that climb well into 66 Fast-moving consumer goods erBoard, now in its 14th year, is to be a the upper 40s. It is not impossible to get voters (grocery, convenience, drug) fact-based guide to the best technology a perfect score of 50, but few do. None vendors operating in retail. The rank- did this year. 45 Department, mass, ings are determined by adding together For a point of reference, the average big box voters scores for Customer Satisfaction (as Customer Satisfaction score for all 90 ven- 41 CIO voters noted by retailers) and publicly avail- dors that received votes in 2014 is 37.8. able information from vendor websites. In a good sign of validation that demon- 33 CEO or president voters The result is one of the most widely strates year-over-year consistency and 33 IT exec (VP, SVP, EVP, etc.) anticipated reports in the retail indus- reliability, the 12-year running average 21 VP level voters (except IT) try, which ultimately influences tens of for Customer Satisfaction for all vendors millions of dollars in annual technology is 37.1, which indicates that this year’s re- 18 Other C-level (except CIO and CEO) purchases. sults fit into a trustworthy pattern. Customer Satisfaction is the signa- Another area of consistency is found ture feature of the Software Leader- in the total number of retailer votes cast, in the retail industry (one point for less Board and what makes the LeaderBoard which provides a reliable foundation on than $20 million and five for more than unique among other vendor reports which Customer Satisfaction scores $250 million). compiled by analyst firms. Unlike other are built. The deeper the voting pool So, what has changed? Every year we vendor landscape reports, the Leader- the more trustworthy the scores. Since delete several software modules from Board gives voice to hundreds of user 2007, the total number of votes cast has the list of 50 in Retail Recognition. We opinions — a peer-to-peer exchange of averaged 778. This year it is 869. make the deletions based on analysis vital information. Another area of methodology that of vendor offerings. Modules that are The Customer Satisfaction score has shown reassuring consistency is offered by the fewest vendors are candi- used in the LeaderBoard is based on Retail Recognition, a metric worth 50 dates for replacement by modules that retailer reviews of 10 criteria that range points that is achieved by counting soft- are becoming increasingly important from return on investment to innovation ware modules worth one point each (one and popular. to quality of support or service. Each of point for POS, workforce management, Consistency is the last refuge of the the 10 criteria is worth a maximum of assortment planning, and so forth). Fi- unimaginative, according to Oscar Wil- five points, so a perfect score is 50. nally, the Revenue Factor category has de, except when it is applied to meth- Many of the top vendors in the Lead- also remained the same. Vendors get odology for annual benchmark studies, erBoard have outstanding Customer one to five points for revenue earned where it becomes a virtue. • PUBLISHER EDITORIAL ONLINE MARKETING/ CORPORATE FOUNDER Albert Guffanti Editorial Director VP of Online Media EVENTS/CIrculation Chairman Douglas C. Edgell 973.607.1380 Joe Skorupa Robert Keenan Director, Event Planning Gabriele A. Edgell 1951-1998 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Pat Benkner [email protected] [email protected] SALES Senior Editor Web Development President & CEO Associate Publisher Tim Denam Manager Director, Event Content Gerald. C. Ryerson Catherine J. Marder [email protected] Scott Ernst John Hall [email protected] 603.672.2796 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Managing Editor Senior Vice President Nicole Giannopoulos Director of Lead Circulation Manager Dave Weinand COMMUNICATIONS Account Executive [email protected] Generation Jeffrey Zabe [email protected] Ashley Ramirez Jason Ward [email protected] 904-524-8335 ART/PRODUCTION [email protected] Vice President [email protected] Creative Director production John Chiego Colette Magliaro Online Event Producer Senior Production [email protected] Assistant to the [email protected] Whitney Ryerson Manager Pat Wisser Publisher [email protected] [email protected] Printed in the USA Member Jen Johnson Art Director CORPORATE OffICE [email protected] Lauren DiMeo Subscriptions 978.671.0449 Edgell Communications [email protected] Reprints: edgellreprints@ 4 Middlebury Blvd, Member parsintl.com Randolph, NJ 07869 212.221.9595 973.607.1300 FAX: 973.607.1395 RISNEWS.COM RIS SOFTWARE LEADERBOARD 2014 3 RIS_Leaderboard2014_v5.indd 3 12/8/14 2:25 PM RIS SOFTWARE OVerall & CATEGORY LEADERBOARD ‘14 leaders Leaders of the Pack From a big-picture perspective, versatility and multi-dimensional strength dominate THERE ISN’T A LARgE quantity of RIS Software LeaderBoard Top 20 running text in the RIS Software Lead- RANK COMPANY CUST. SAT. RET. CON. REV. FAC. TOTAL erBoard, but there is one thing in abun- 1 ECRS 49.1 43 2 94.1 dance — tables and lists. Lots of them. 2 Celerant Technology 47.9 44 2 93.9 There are 51 lists to pore over in this report. Each one features a ranking of 3 JDS Solutions 47.6 41 1 89.6 software vendors based on data collect- 3 Oracle 37.6 47 5 89.6 ed from three sources — retailer evalu- 4 PCMS 41.7 44 3 88.7 ations, vendor-submitted forms, and 5 MicroStrategy 42.2 40 5 87.2 information found on vendor websites. This chapter focuses on showing how 6 SAP 33.9 48 5 86.9 retail software vendors rank when their 7 NCR 36.6 45 5 86.6 full set of data is formatted in horizontal 8 MI9 47.1 38 1 86.1 rows for each vendor and the columns 9 Epicor 37.6 42 5 84.6 are added to create a total score. Oth- 10 Manthan Systems 42.5 40 2 84.5 er parts of the study feature data that is sliced and diced in logical ways, but 11 QuantiSense 46.2 37 1 84.2 here the focus is on rankings based on 11 JDA 38.2 41 5 84.2 the sum of points awarded for Customer 12 Cegid 44.8 35 3 82.8 Satisfaction, Revenue Factor and Retail 13 Raymark 44.4 36 1 81.4 Concentration. (See page 18 for a de- 13 Micros Retail 30.4 46 5 81.4 tailed explanation of methodology and point scoring. Also note that when Cus- 14 Jesta I.S. 45.1 28 2 75.1 tomer Satisfaction, Revenue Factor and 15 MultiDev Technologies 35.8 36 1 72.8 Retail Concentration are capitalized it 16 UTC Retail 42.5 26 3 71.5 is meant to specifically refer to Leader- 17 Magstar 44.2 26 1 71.2 Board scoring.) In the top-20 master list (the only list 18 Logility 45.4 23 2 70.4 that is longer than 10), we see software 19 Toshiba GCS (IBM RSS) 40.0 25 5 70.0 vendors ranked by scores that are pro- 20 Manhattan Associates 41.2 23 5 69.2 duced using the full data set. The list be- gins by pulling datapoints together from all 52 vendors that surpassed the mini- mum number of retailer votes or evalua- tions required. The minimum number of Top 5 Software vendors who received the most retailer votes votes is five, although the vast majority of vendors have 10 or more evaluations 1 Microsoft in their voting pools. Only 18 vendors 2 Oracle had less than 10 and only a few of these 3 IBM appear in any lists. 4 Epicor Every vendor that appears in the top- 5 Dell 20 master list is either a well-rounded software provider that has an above- (Continued on page 10.) 4 RIS SOFTWARE LEADERBOARD 2014 RISNEWS.COM RIS SOFTWARE OVerall & CATEGORY LEADERBOARD ‘14 leaders Cust. sat. for Large Vendors Large Vendor Leaders RANK Company CUST. SAT. RANK Company CUST. SAT. RET. CON. REV. FAC. TOTAL 1 Lexmark 45.4 1 Oracle 37.6 47 5 89.6 2 AirWatch (VMware) 43.0 2 MicroStrategy 42.2 40 5 87.2 3 MicroStrategy 42.2 3 SAP 33.9 48 5 86.9 4 Dell 41.5 4 NCR 36.6 45 5 86.6 5 Manhattan Associates 41.2 5 Epicor 37.6 42 5 84.6 6 Verifone 40.7 6 JDA 38.2 41 5 84.2 7 Akamai 40.5 7 Micros Retail 30.4 46 5 81.4 8 Microsoft 40.3 8 Toshiba GCS (IBM RSS) 40.0 25 5 70.0 9 Toshiba GCS (IBM RSS) 40.0 9 Manhattan Associates 41.2 23 5 69.2 10 IBM 39.7 10 IBM 39.7 23 5 67.7 Cust. sat. for Mid-Size Vendor Leaders Mid-Size Vendor Leaders RANK Company CUST. SAT. RANK Company CUST. SAT. RET. CON. REV. FAC. TOTAL 1 Cornell-Mayo 49.9 1 ECRS 49.1 43 2 94.1 2 ECRS 49.1 2 Celerant Technology 47.9 44 2 93.9 3 RTC Quaterion Group 48.9 3 JDS Solutions 47.6 41 1 89.6 4 Celerant Technology 47.9 4 PCMS 41.7 44 3 88.7 5 JDS Solutions 47.6 5 MI9 47.1 38 1 86.1 6 MI9 47.1 6 Manthan Systems 42.5 40 2 84.5 7 TradeStone Software 46.6 7 QuantiSense 46.2 37 1 84.2 8 QuantiSense 46.2 8 Cegid 44.8 35 3 82.8 8 Reflexis Systems 46.2 9 Raymark 44.4 36 1 81.4 9 NGC Software 46.0 10 Jesta I.S.
Recommended publications
  • American Software, Inc
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 _________________________ FORM 10-K _________________________ (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 0-12456 _________________________ AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) _________________________ Georgia 58-1098795 (State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 470 East Paces Ferry Road, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30305 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (404) 261-4381 Registrant’s telephone number, including area code Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol Name of each exchange on which registered None None Table of Contents Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Class A Common Shares, $0.10 Par Value (Title of class) _________________________ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Offerings for Recommended Accounting Pos Software
    Microsoft Offerings For Recommended Accounting Pos Software Is Broddy dried or zymogenic when inditing some zlotys sandbags deceptively? Geocentric and forkier Steward still flocculated his confluence defiantly. Rufus never crackle any phosphenes bedim wrongly, is Pascale worldwide and haunted enough? Users to segment leads through a cash flow, look into actionable next steps: pos for microsoft accounting software offerings, do integrate two factors like docs and We help users oversee the market for microsoft accounting software offerings pos systems we dig deep data according to use rights or feedback on many benefits. Digital Insight CGI IT UK Ltd. Using Spruce, Chic Lumber Increases efficiency and gains management insights. Power bi reports customization, then evaluate and accounting for more informed decisions across the. The GPS OCX program also will reduce cost, schedule and technical risk. Pos software is a credit card, or service software offerings for microsoft accounting pos captures guest details such as an online, customer insights they require. Or you can even download apps to track team performance. POS providers offer a free trial, but you should look for a company that does. Pricing is available on request and support is extended via phone and other online measures. Help inside business owners know that makes it solutions built to perform administrative offices in hand so integration, price for retailers with offers software offerings for pos system! The app provides time tracking features to see how long crucial tasks take. These virtual desktops are accessed from either PCs, thin clients, or other devices. When the subscription ends the institution will no longer have access to subscription benefits or new activations or product keys, however, they receive perpetual use rights to any software obtained during the subscription term and may continue to use the products.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Pacific and IBM: Bringing Flexibility to Retail Data Management Retail Merchandizing and Store Operations Software Solutions
    IBM ISV & Developer Relations Retail Solution Brief Island Pacific and IBM: bringing flexibility to retail data management Retail merchandizing and store operations software solutions A partnership between Island Pacific Systems, Inc. and IBM enables Highlights: retail organizations to optimize the management of merchandizing and store operations software solutions. By doing so, retailers can • Modular and scalable retail extract more business value from their available data while improving management solutions the customer shopping experience, eliminating risks and speeding • Integrated suite features return on investment. stand-alone applications • Enables retailers to manage entire Solution Overview scope of operations Organizations in the retail industry are awash with data management systems required to run a wide array of business processes. These • IBM Retail Industry Framework validated solution operations can include point-of-sale (POS), customer relationship management, vendor relationship management, merchandising, • Runs exclusively on the IBM Power™ series demand forecasting and more. To cope with their growing data management challenges, many retail IT organizations have evolved into the role of systems integrator, maintaining large and entrenched development staffs to write programs and update source codes on their applications. Such operations are costly, while their systems are typically inflexible and loosely coupled. It does not have to be this way. Island Pacific Systems, Inc. is a global leader in inventory management and other retail software solutions. For more than 30 years, the Irvine, California-based company has provided scalable, flexible and affordable solutions for retailers throughout the world. These solutions enable retailers to manage the entire scope of their operations, and to meet the many demands of their customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Vardhaman Mahaveer Open University, Kota
    BCA-14 Vardhaman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Computer Applications in Corporate World Course Development Committee Chairman Prof. (Dr.) Naresh Dadhich Former Vice-Chancellor Vardhaman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Co-ordinator/Convener and Members Convener/ Co-ordinator Dr. Anuradha Sharma Assistant Professor, Department of Botany, Vardhaman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Members 1. Dr. Neeraj Bhargava 3. Dr. Madhavi Sinha Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science Maharishi Dyanand University, Ajmer Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Jaipur 2. Prof. Reena Dadhich 4. Dr. Rajeev Srivatava Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science University of Kota, Kota LBS College, Jaipur 5. Dr. Nishtha Keswani Department of Computer Science Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer Editing and Course Writing Editor Dr. Rajeev Srivastava Department of Computer Science LBS College, Jaipur Unit Writers Unit No. Unit No. 1. Dr. Aman Jain (1,2,3) 5. Ms. Samata Soni (10,11) Department of Computer Application Department of Computer Science Deepshikha Institute of Technology, Jaipur Kanoria Girls College, Jaipur 2. Sh. Ashish Chandra Swami (4,5) 6. Sh. Akash Saxena (12,13) Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science Subodh PG College, Jaipur St. Wilfred College, Jaipur 3. Dr. Vijay Singh Rathore (6,7) 7. Dr. Leena Bhatia (14,15) Department of Computer Application Department of Computer Science Shri Karni College, Jaipur Subodh PG College, Jaipur 4. Sh. Sandeep Sharma (8,9) Department of Computer Science Deepshikha Institute of Technology, Jaipur Academic and Administrative Management Prof. (Dr.) Vinay Kumar Pathak Prof. B.K. Sharma Prof. (Dr.) P.K. Sharma Vice-Chancellor Director (Academic) Director (Regional Services) Vardhaman Mahveer Open University, Vardhaman Mahveer Open University, Vardhaman Mahveer Open University, Kota Kota Kota Course Material Production Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Oracle Retail Demand Forecasting User Guide for the RPAS Fusion Client, 16.0.2 E93967-04
    Oracle® Retail Demand Forecasting User Guide for the RPAS Fusion Client Release 16.0.2 E93967-04 August 2018 Oracle Retail Demand Forecasting User Guide for the RPAS Fusion Client, 16.0.2 E93967-04 Copyright © 2018, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Primary Author: Melissa Artley This software and related documentation are provided under a license agreement containing restrictions on use and disclosure and are protected by intellectual property laws. Except as expressly permitted in your license agreement or allowed by law, you may not use, copy, reproduce, translate, broadcast, modify, license, transmit, distribute, exhibit, perform, publish, or display any part, in any form, or by any means. Reverse engineering, disassembly, or decompilation of this software, unless required by law for interoperability, is prohibited. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice and is not warranted to be error-free. If you find any errors, please report them to us in writing. If this is software or related documentation that is delivered to the U.S. Government or anyone licensing it on behalf of the U.S. Government, then the following notice is applicable: U.S. GOVERNMENT END USERS: Oracle programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, delivered to U.S. Government end users are "commercial computer software" pursuant to the applicable Federal Acquisition Regulation and agency-specific supplemental regulations. As such, use, duplication, disclosure, modification, and adaptation of the programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, shall be subject to license terms and license restrictions applicable to the programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Release
    INVESTOR RELEASE Noida, India, July 19th, 2021 Revenue at US $ 2,720 mn; up 0.9% QoQ & up 15.5% YoY Revenue in Constant Currency; up 0.7% QoQ & up 11.7% YoY EBITDA margin at 24.5%; EBIT margin at 19.6% Net Income at US $ 436 mn (Net Income margin at 16.0%) up 6.4% QoQ & up 12.8% YoY Revenue at ` 20,068 crores; up 2.2% QoQ & up 12.5% YoY Net Income at ` 3,214 crores; up 8.5% QoQ & up 9.9% YoY Financial Highlights 2 Corporate Overview 4 Performance Trends 5 Financials in US$ 19 Cash and Cash Equivalents, Investments & Borrowings 22 Revenue Analysis at Company Level 23 Constant Currency Reporting 24 Client Metrics 25 Headcount 25 Financials in ` 26 - 1 - (Amount in US $ Million) Growth Particulars Q1 FY’22 Margin% QoQ YoY Revenue 2,720 0.9% 15.5% Revenue Growth (Constant Currency) 0.7% 11.7% EBITDA 665 24.5% -5.3% 10.3% EBIT 533 19.6% -2.9% 10.2% Net Income 436 16.0% 6.4% 12.8% (Amount in ` Crores) Growth Particulars Q1 FY’22 Margin% QoQ YoY Revenue 20,068 2.2% 12.5% EBITDA 4,908 24.5% -3.7% 7.5% EBIT 3,931 19.6% -1.2% 7.4% Net Income 3,214 16.0% 8.5% 9.9% Note: All QoQ comparisons with respect to profits and profitability ratios are excluding the impact of onetime milestone bonus in Q4 FY’21: $99.8 mn ($78.8 mn net of tax); ` 728 crores (` 575 crores net of tax).
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Information Technology Applications in Retail Merchandising
    An Overview of Information Technology Applications in Retail Merchandising Version 4 August 20, 1998 Bharat P. Rao, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Management Institute for Technology and Enterprise Polytechnic Univeristy 55 Broad St., Suite 13B New York, NY 10004 [email protected] Voice 212.547.7030 Ext. 205 A Report to the Harvard-Wharton Project on Retail Merchandising Effectiveness Project Leaders: Dr. Marshall Fisher, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Dr. Ananth Raman, Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration The author would like to acknowledge the valuable inputs and feedback provided by Anna Sheen McClelland, Ananth Raman, Marshall Fisher, Tom Armentrout, and access to interview data from participating retailers. Copyright © 1998 by Bharat P. Rao. Do not cite or use without prior permission. An Overview of Information Technology Applications in Retail Merchandising Introduction Contemporary IT systems enable retailers and other supply chain intermediaries to answer several interesting questions related to their businesses. However, most retailers remain unaware of the substantial benefits of leveraging IT into their operations. They also lack a suitable roadmap on the types of products and services available in the changing terrain of the IT industry in general, and in the emerging areas of data mining, data warehousing, enterprise commerce, and supply chain management in particular. In this write-up, we briefly explore the evolution of IT systems with potential applications in retailing, and the types of business questions they can possibly answer. Problem areas in application of IT solutions to the retailing industry are identified and discussed, with particular emphasis on merchandising systems. We also provide a description on the state of the industry in the areas of data warehousing, data mining, enterprise software, and back end integration, along with brief summaries of major vendors in each of these categories.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Reality for Retail
    THE RetailerIssue 55 – February 2017 A new reality for retail Amazon’s Arrival Employment & Expansion Sustainable Success Bezos’s behemoth has its sights set Recruitment plays a critical role to The power of ethical operations on the Australian retail market managing rapid retail growth and socially-conscious retailing NEED HELP SHOPPING FOR THE RIGHT INSURANCE? Members benefit from premium savings of up to 40% as well as increases in cover, a call to ARA Insurance will be extremely rewarding. Whether you’re a hundred stores plus retailer We have the resources and relationships to or a single store owner we can help you get ensure you’re fully covered. the most out of your insurance program. We offer industry leading insurance products The Australian insurance market for retailers for retailers including: has remained aggressive and now is the – Property and stock protection perfect time to shop around and see what – Public and products liability premium savings and cover benefits are – Cyber and data protection out there. Call us now for an obligation free quotation to see how your current insurance premium and cover compares to ARA Insurance. [email protected] 1300 368 041 ardrossaninsurance.com.au NEED HELP SHOPPING In this issue: Features FOR THE RIGHT ARA PRODUCTION TEAM 10 AMAZON’S ARRIVAL: PREPARE OR PANIC? Editors Australian retailers are bracing for battle against the e-commerce juggernaut Katherine Mechanicos Benjamin Staley INSURANCE? 20 A NEW REALITY FOR RETAIL [email protected] The potential of Virtual and Augmented
    [Show full text]
  • Licensing Guide Release 14.1.X and 14.2 E66403-01
    Oracle® Retail Licensing Guide Release 14.1.x and 14.2 E66403-01 September 2015 Oracle® Retail Licensing Guide, Release 14.1.x and 14.2 Copyright © 2015, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Primary Author: Rakhee Prabhudesai This software and related documentation are provided under a license agreement containing restrictions on use and disclosure and are protected by intellectual property laws. Except as expressly permitted in your license agreement or allowed by law, you may not use, copy, reproduce, translate, broadcast, modify, license, transmit, distribute, exhibit, perform, publish, or display any part, in any form, or by any means. Reverse engineering, disassembly, or decompilation of this software, unless required by law for interoperability, is prohibited. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice and is not warranted to be error-free. If you find any errors, please report them to us in writing. If this software or related documentation is delivered to the U.S. Government or anyone licensing it on behalf of the U.S. Government, then the following notice is applicable: U.S. GOVERNMENT END USERS: Oracle programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, delivered to U.S. Government end users are "commercial computer software" pursuant to the applicable Federal Acquisition Regulation and agency-specific supplemental regulations. As such, use, duplication, disclosure, modification, and adaptation of the programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, shall be subject to license terms and license restrictions applicable to the programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Research Magazine March 2012
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Agricultural Research Magazine Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 3-2012 Agricultural Research Magazine March 2012 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaagresmag Part of the Agriculture Commons, Animal Sciences Commons, Food Science Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons "Agricultural Research Magazine March 2012" (2012). Agricultural Research Magazine. 132. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaagresmag/132 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agricultural Research Magazine by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service March 2012 Agricultural Research Service6ROYLQJ3UREOHPVIRUWKH*URZLQJ:RUOG 9255_March2012r2-15.indd 1 2/15/12 11:50 AM healthcare costs in 2009 the conservators of the gold standard reached an estimated $2.5 of nutrient-profile data compilations trillion, yet America still ranks below worldwide. Read about the many U.S. severalcountriesinlife expectancy and Provides software makers who download and many key indicators of healthy living. import this premier nutrient database “These statistics underscore the vast a Wealth of into nutrition products on page 8. potential of a healthful diet and lifestyle Information Public and private sector users also to prevent chronic diseases before they rely on results of the annual ARS na- begin and to reduce healthcare costs,” tional “What We Eat in America”sur- says Molly Kretsch, Agricultural Re- vey ofthe foodspeople consume, when search Service Deputy Administrator the ‘Healthy Eating’ message of the and where the foodsare consumed, and for Nutrition, Food Safety and Quality.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Stupidity: Over 20 Years of High-Tech Marketing Disasters
    CYAN YELLOW MAGENTA BLACK PANTONE 123 CV Chapman “A funny AND grim read that explains why so many of the high-tech sales departments I’ve trained and written about over the years frequently have Merrill R.Chapman homicidal impulses towards their marketing groups. A must read.” Foreword by Eric Sink —Mike Bosworth Author of Solution Selling, Creating Buyers in Difficult Selling Markets and coauthor of Customer Centric Selling In Search of Stupidity In Search OVER 20 YEARS OF HIGH-TECH MARKETING DISASTERS 20 YEARS OF HIGH-TECH OVER n 1982 Tom Peters and Robert Waterman Ikicked off the modern business book era with In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies. Unfortunately, as time went by it became painfully obvious that many of the companies Peters and Waterman had profiled, particularly the high-tech ones, were something less than excellent. Firms such as Atari, DEC, IBM, Lanier, Wang, Xerox and others either crashed and burned or underwent painful and wrenching traumas you would have expected excellent companies to avoid. What went wrong? Merrill R. (Rick) Chapman believes he has the answer (and the proof is in these pages). He’s observed that high-tech companies periodically meltdown because they fail to learn from the lessons of the past and thus continue to make the same completely avoidable mistakes again and again and again. To help teach you this, In Search of Stupidity takes you on a fascinating journey from yesterday to today as it salvages some of high-tech’s most famous car wrecks. You will be there as MicroPro, once the industry’s largest desktop software company, destroys itself by committing a fundamental positioning mistake.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Step—Conservators of the National Nutrient Database
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Agricultural Research Magazine Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 3-2012 The Second Step—Conservators of the National Nutrient Database Rosalie Marion Bliss USDA-ARS, [email protected] Joanne Holden USDA-ARS, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaagresmag Part of the Agriculture Commons, Animal Sciences Commons, Food Science Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons Bliss, Rosalie Marion and Holden, Joanne, "The Second Step—Conservators of the National Nutrient Database" (2012). Agricultural Research Magazine. 138. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaagresmag/138 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agricultural Research Magazine by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The Second Step—Conservators of the National Nutrient Database 1XWULWLRQ0RQLWRULQJ AThree-Part Series ● Monitoring Best Practices for compiling their food-composition data- work with a large number of industry Food Analysis p. 4 bases. “The Standard Reference—called groups, because they recognize the value ● Monitoring Food-Supply ‘SR’for short—is thefoundation of almost of being represented in the publicly avail- all of the food and nutrition databases, able SR database.” Nutrients p. 8 whether commercial or nonprofit, used The SR database includes more than ● Monitoring the U.S. Population’s in the United States,” says Holden. “It is 7,900 foods—and provides nutrient- Diet p.16 critical for national food policymakers, composition values, called “nutrient researchers, and those responsible for profiles,” for each of these food entries.
    [Show full text]