Biology and Ecology of the Orange-Vaal Largemouth and Smallmouth Yellowfishes in the Vaal River

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biology and Ecology of the Orange-Vaal Largemouth and Smallmouth Yellowfishes in the Vaal River Biology and Ecology of the Orange-Vaal Largemouth and Smallmouth Yellowfishes in the Vaal River Gordon O’Brien & Pierre de Villiers (editors) TT 508/11 Biology and ecology of the Orange-Vaal largemouth and smallmouth Yellowfishes in the Vaal River Report to the Water Research Commission Edited by Gordon O’Brien1 and Pierre De Villiers2&3 1Centre for Aquatic Research, Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg 2Scientific Services, Cape Nature 3Orange-Vaal River Yellowfish Conservation and Management Association WRC Report No. TT 508/11 October 2011 Obtainable from: Water Research Commission Private Bag X03 Gezina, Pretoria 0031 SOUTH AFRICA Email: [email protected] The publication of this report emanates from the WRC consultancies titled: 1. An assessment of selected biology aspects of the two yellowfish species Labeobarbus kimberleyensis and L. aeneus from the Orange-Vaal River system, South Africa (WRC Project No. K8/678). 2. Effects of flow and temperature on spawning and recruitment of Largemouth (Labeobarbus kimberleyensis) and Smallmouth (L. aeneus) yellowfish (WRC Project No. K8/803). 3. Assessment of selected biological features associated with the breeding biology of the threatened Orange-Vaal River Largemouth yellowfish and the Orange-Vaal River Smallmouth yellowfish from the Orange-Vaal River system. (WRC Project No. K8/818). DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the view and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ISBN 978-1-4312-0165-5 Printed in the Republic of South Africa ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive summary ............................................................................................. 1 2. General introduction ............................................................................................ 5 3. Species identification, taxonomy and notes on evolutionary and phylogenetic development. ..................................................................................................... 10 3.1. Taxonomic history of the Vaal River yellowfishes ..................................... 10 3.1.1. Orange-Vaal smallmouth yellowfish .................................................. 10 3.1.2. Orange-Vaal largemouth yellowfish ................................................... 11 3.2. Species identification ................................................................................. 11 3.3. Notes on evolutionary and phylogenetic development .............................. 20 4. Reproductive biology and early development ................................................... 22 4.1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 22 4.2. Review of the known reproductive biology of the Vaal River yellowfishes 23 4.3. Artificial reproduction experiment .............................................................. 26 4.3.1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 26 4.3.2. Materials and methods ...................................................................... 26 4.3.3. Results: .............................................................................................. 40 4.4. Early development of yellowfishes ............................................................ 42 4.4.1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 42 4.4.2. Materials and methods ...................................................................... 44 4.4.3. Results and discussion ...................................................................... 45 Early development of the Smallmouth yellowfish ........................................... 45 Early development of the Largemouth yellowfish ........................................... 51 4.4.4. Conclusions ....................................................................................... 61 5. Age validation .................................................................................................... 63 5.1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 63 5.2. Materials and methods .............................................................................. 66 5.3. Results and discussion .............................................................................. 67 5.3.1. Larval development and hatching ...................................................... 67 5.3.2. Age validation .................................................................................... 69 5.4. Conclusions ............................................................................................... 72 6. Home ranges, habitat use, migrations and general behaviour .......................... 73 6.1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 73 6.2. Materials and methods .............................................................................. 76 6.2.1. The study area ................................................................................... 79 6.2.2. Biotelemetry monitoring methods ...................................................... 80 iii 6.2.3. Yellowfishes used in the study .......................................................... 86 6.2.4. Environmental conditions monitored ................................................. 88 6.2.5. Data analyses methods ..................................................................... 89 6.3. General behavioural biology and ecology ................................................. 91 6.3.1. Consideration of individual behavioural patterns. .............................. 92 6.3.2. Home ranges ................................................................................... 103 6.3.3. Habitat use ...................................................................................... 105 6.3.4. Coordinated migrations ................................................................... 110 Spawning migrations .................................................................................... 111 Migrations of larvae and juvenile yellowfish ................................................. 112 Seasonal migrations of adult yellowfishes .................................................... 113 6.3.5. Comments on possible territoriality behaviour of Vaal River yellowfishes. ..................................................................................................... 114 7. Aspects of the Conservation and management of Vaal River yellowfishes .... 116 7.1. Review of the socio-economic value assessment of Yellowfish in the Vaal River ........................................................................................................ 116 7.2. Review of the impact of angling on yellowfish of the Vaal River ............. 118 7.3. Simplified Regional Scale Risk Assessment of the threats Largemouth Yellowfish in the Vaal River. .................................................................... 120 7.3.1. Introduction ...................................................................................... 120 7.3.2. Materials and methods .................................................................... 121 Problem formulation ..................................................................................... 121 Study area .................................................................................................... 122 Ecological assessment endpoints ................................................................ 124 Habitat identification ..................................................................................... 124 Source and associated stressor identification .............................................. 125 Conceptual site model .................................................................................. 125 Ranking system ............................................................................................ 126 Risk characterisation .................................................................................... 128 7.3.3. Results and discussion .................................................................... 129 Sum of the relative ranks per stressor .......................................................... 129 Sum of relative ranks per habitat .................................................................. 130 Sum of relative risk per endpoint .................................................................. 131 The relative risks per risk region .................................................................. 131 Scenario assessments ................................................................................. 132 7.3.4. Conclusions ..................................................................................... 136 8. Closing remarks and recommendations .......................................................... 137 iv 8.1. Closing remarks ...................................................................................... 137 8.2. Recommendations .................................................................................. 138 9. Acknowledgements ......................................................................................... 140 10. References .....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Effect of Water Temperature on Aquatic Organisms: a Review of Knowledge and Methods for Assessing Biotic Responses to Temperature
    The effect of water temperature on aquatic organisms: a review of knowledge and methods for assessing biotic responses to temperature Report to the Water Research Commission by Helen Dallas The Freshwater Consulting Group Freshwater Research Unit Department of Zoology University of Cape Town WRC Report No. KV 213/09 30 28 26 24 22 C) o 20 18 16 14 Temperature ( 12 10 8 6 4 Jul '92 Jul Oct '91 Apr '92 Jun '92 Jan '93 Mar '92 Feb '92 Feb '93 Aug '91 Nov '91 Nov '91 Dec Aug '92 Sep '92 '92 Nov '92 Dec May '92 Sept '91 Month and Year i Obtainable from Water Research Commission Private Bag X03 GEZINA, 0031 [email protected] The publication of this report emanates from a project entitled: The effect of water temperature on aquatic organisms: A review of knowledge and methods for assessing biotic responses to temperature (WRC project no K8/690). DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use ISBN978-1-77005-731-9 Printed in the Republic of South Africa ii Preface This report comprises five deliverables for the one-year consultancy project to the Water Research Commission, entitled “The effect of water temperature on aquatic organisms – a review of knowledge and methods for assessing biotic responses to temperature” (K8-690). Deliverable 1 (Chapter 1) is a literature review aimed at consolidating available information pertaining to water temperature in aquatic ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish, Various Invertebrates
    Zambezi Basin Wetlands Volume II : Chapters 7 - 11 - Contents i Back to links page CONTENTS VOLUME II Technical Reviews Page CHAPTER 7 : FRESHWATER FISHES .............................. 393 7.1 Introduction .................................................................... 393 7.2 The origin and zoogeography of Zambezian fishes ....... 393 7.3 Ichthyological regions of the Zambezi .......................... 404 7.4 Threats to biodiversity ................................................... 416 7.5 Wetlands of special interest .......................................... 432 7.6 Conservation and future directions ............................... 440 7.7 References ..................................................................... 443 TABLE 7.2: The fishes of the Zambezi River system .............. 449 APPENDIX 7.1 : Zambezi Delta Survey .................................. 461 CHAPTER 8 : FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS ................... 487 8.1 Introduction ................................................................. 487 8.2 Literature review ......................................................... 488 8.3 The Zambezi River basin ............................................ 489 8.4 The Molluscan fauna .................................................. 491 8.5 Biogeography ............................................................... 508 8.6 Biomphalaria, Bulinis and Schistosomiasis ................ 515 8.7 Conservation ................................................................ 516 8.8 Further investigations .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Status of Freshwater Fish Age Validation Studies and a Prioritization Framework for Further Research Jonathan J
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit -- Staff ubP lications Unit 2015 The Global Status of Freshwater Fish Age Validation Studies and a Prioritization Framework for Further Research Jonathan J. Spurgeon University of Nebraska–Lincoln, [email protected] Martin J. Hamel University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Kevin L. Pope U.S. Geological Survey—Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit,, [email protected] Mark A. Pegg University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ncfwrustaff Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Spurgeon, Jonathan J.; Hamel, Martin J.; Pope, Kevin L.; and Pegg, Mark A., "The Global Status of Freshwater Fish Age Validation Studies and a Prioritization Framework for Further Research" (2015). Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit -- Staff Publications. 203. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ncfwrustaff/203 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit -- Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 23:329–345, 2015 CopyrightO c Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 2330-8249 print / 2330-8257 online DOI: 10.1080/23308249.2015.1068737 The Global Status of Freshwater Fish Age Validation Studies and a Prioritization Framework for Further Research JONATHAN J.
    [Show full text]
  • Jlb Smith Institute of Ichthyology
    ISSN 0075-2088 J.L.B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY GRAHAMSTOWN, SOUTH AFRICA SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 56 SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAMES OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FRESHWATER FISHES by Paul H. Skelton November 1993 SERIAL PUBLICATIONS o f THE J.L.B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY The Institute publishes original research on the systematics, zoogeography, ecology, biology and conservation of fishes. Manuscripts on ancillary subjects (aquaculture, fishery biology, historical ichthyology and archaeology pertaining to fishes) will be considered subject to the availability of publication funds. Two series are produced at irregular intervals: the Special Publication series and the Ichthyological Bulletin series. Acceptance of manuscripts for publication is subject to the approval of reviewers from outside the Institute. Priority is given to papers by staff of the Institute, but manuscripts from outside the Institute will be considered if they are pertinent to the work of the Institute. Colour illustrations can be printed at the expense of the author. Publications of the Institute are available by subscription or in exchange for publi­ cations of other institutions. Lists of the Institute’s publications are available from the Publications Secretary at the address below. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Manuscripts shorter than 30 pages will generally be published in the Special Publications series; longer papers will be considered for the Ichthyological Bulletin series. Please follow the layout and format of a recent Bulletin or Special Publication. Manuscripts must be submitted in duplicate to the Editor, J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Private Bag 1015, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa. The typescript must be double-spaced throughout with 25 mm margins all round.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Proceedings 2006
    FOSAF THE FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FLYFISHERS PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10 TH YELLOWFISH WORKING GROUP CONFERENCE STERKFONTEIN DAM, HARRISMITH 07 – 09 APRIL 2006 Edited by Peter Arderne PRINTING & DISTRIBUTION SPONSORED BY: sappi 1 CONTENTS Page List of participants 3 Press release 4 Chairman’s address -Bill Mincher 5 The effects of pollution on fish and people – Dr Steve Mitchell 7 DWAF Quality Status Report – Upper Vaal Management Area 2000 – 2005 - Riana 9 Munnik Water: The full picture of quality management & technology demand – Dries Louw 17 Fish kills in the Vaal: What went wrong? – Francois van Wyk 18 Water Pollution: The viewpoint of Eco-Care Trust – Mornē Viljoen 19 Why the fish kills in the Vaal? –Synthesis of the five preceding presentations 22 – Dr Steve Mitchell The Elands River Yellowfish Conservation Area – George McAllister 23 Status of the yellowfish populations in Limpopo Province – Paul Fouche 25 North West provincial report on the status of the yellowfish species – Daan Buijs & 34 Hermien Roux Status of yellowfish in KZN Province – Rob Karssing 40 Status of the yellowfish populations in the Western Cape – Dean Impson 44 Regional Report: Northern Cape (post meeting)– Ramogale Sekwele 50 Yellowfish conservation in the Free State Province – Pierre de Villiers 63 A bottom-up approach to freshwater conservation in the Orange Vaal River basin – 66 Pierre de Villiers Status of the yellowfish populations in Gauteng Province – Piet Muller 69 Yellowfish research: A reality to face – Dr Wynand Vlok 72 Assessing the distribution & flow requirements of endemic cyprinids in the Olifants- 86 Doring river system - Bruce Paxton Yellowfish genetics projects update – Dr Wynand Vlok on behalf of Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of the Critically Endangered Freshwater Fish Species, the Clanwilliam Sandfish (Labeo Seeberi)
    Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of the critically endangered freshwater fish species, the Clanwilliam sandfish (Labeo seeberi) By Shaun Francois Lesch Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Faculty of Natural Science at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Dr C. Rhode Co-supervisor: Dr R. Slabbert Department of Genetics December 2020 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration: By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: December 2020 Copyright © 2020 Stellenbosch University All Rights Reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract: Labeo spp. are large freshwater fish found throughout southern Asia, the Middle East and Africa. The genus is characterised by specialised structures around the mouth and lips making it adapted to herbivorous feeding (algae and detritus). Clanwilliam sandfish (Labeo seeberi) was once widespread throughout its natural habitat (Olifants-Doring River system), but significant decreases in population size have seen them become absent in the Olifants River and retreat to the headwaters in the tributaries of the Doring River. Currently sandfish are confined to three populations namely the Oorlogskloof Nature Reserve (OKNR), Rietkuil (Riet) and Bos, with OKNR being the largest of the three and deemed the species sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Habits and Trace Metal Concentrations in the Muscle of Lapping Minnow Garra Quadrimaculata (Rüppell, 1835) (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in Lake Hawassa, Ethiopia
    Research Article http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mejs.v8i2.2 Feeding habits and trace metal concentrations in the muscle of lapping minnow Garra quadrimaculata (Rüppell, 1835) (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in Lake Hawassa, Ethiopia Yosef Tekle-Giorgis1*, Hiwot Yilma2 and Elias Dadebo2 1School of Animal and Range Sciences, College of Agriculture, P.O. Box 336, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia (*[email protected]). 2Department of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, P.O. Box 5, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia. ABSTRACT Diet composition and trace metal concentration in the muscle of the lapping minnow Garra quadrimaculata (Rüppell, 1835) was investigated to study the trophic status of the species as well as to assess the level of bioaccumulation of heavy metals in the body of the fish. The study was conducted based on 328 gut samples collected from February to March (dry months) and from August to September (wet months) of the year 2011. Frequency of occurrence and volumetric methods were employed in this study. Detritus, fish eggs, macrophytes, phytoplankton and insects occurred in 54.9%, 16.2%, 43.9%, 56.4% and 26.6% of the guts, respectively and comprised 27.1%, 22.2%, 18.2%, 18.2% and 14.1% of the total volume of food, respectively. The proportions of different food items consumed varied during the dry and wet months. Fish eggs and detritus were the dominant food items during the dry months. Macrophytes and insects were also common in the diet. During the wet months, phytoplankton was the most dominant food item (33.5% by volume). Macrophytes, detritus and insects were also important in the diet.
    [Show full text]
  • Fosaf Proceedings of the 13Th Yellowfish Working
    1 FOSAF THE FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FLYFISHERS PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH YELLOWFISH WORKING GROUP CONFERENCE STERKFONTEIN DAM, HARRISMITH 06 – 08 MARCH 2009 Edited by Peter Arderne PRINTING SPONSORED BY: 13th Yellowfish Working Group Conference 2 CONTENTS Page Participants 3 Chairman’s Opening Address – Peter Mills 4 Water volumes of SA dams: A global perspective – Louis De Wet 6 The Strontium Isotope distribution in Water & Fish – Wikus Jordaan 13 Overview of the Mine Drainage Impacts in the West Rand Goldfield – Mariette 16 Liefferink Adopt-a-River Programme: Development of an implementation plan – Ramogale 25 Sekwele Report on the Genetic Study of small scaled yellowfishes – Paulette Bloomer 26 The Biology of Smallmouth & Largemouth yellowfish in Lake Gariep – Bruce Ellender 29 & Olaf Weyl Likely response of Smallmouth yellowfish populations to fisheries development – Olaf 33 Weyl Early Development of Vaal River Smallmouth Yellowfish - Daksha Naran 36 Body shape changes & accompanying habitat shifts: observations in life cycle of 48 Labeobarbus marequensis in the Luvuvhu River – Paul Fouche Alien Fish Eradication in the Cape rivers: Progress with the EIA – Dean Impson 65 Yellowfish Telemetry: Update on the existing study – Gordon O’Brien 67 Bushveld Smallscale yellowfish (Labeobarbus polylepis): Aspects of the Ecology & 68 Population Mananagement– Gordon O’Brien Protected River Ecosystems Study: Bloubankspruit, Skeerpoort & Magalies River & 71 Elands River (Mpumalanga) – Hylton Lewis & Gordon O’Brien Legislative review: Critical
    [Show full text]
  • YWG Conference Proceedings 2014
    FOSAF PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18 TH YELLOWFISH WORKING GROUP CONFERENCE BLACK MOUNTAIN HOTEL, THABA ´NCHU, FREE STATE PROVINCE Image courtesy of Carl Nicholson EDITED BY PETER ARDERNE 1 18 th Yellowfish Working Group Conference CONTENTS Page Participants 3 Opening address – Peter Mills 4 State of the rivers of the Kruger National Park – Robin Petersen 6 A fish kill protocol for South Africa – Byron Grant 10 Phylogeographic structure in the KwaZulu-Natal yellowfish – Connor Stobie 11 Restoration of native fishes in the lower Rondegat River after alien fish eradication: 15 an overview of a successful conservation intervention.- Darragh Woodford Yellowfish behavioural work in South Africa: past, present and future research – 19 Gordon O’Brien The occurrence and distribution of yellowfish in state dams in the Free State. – Leon 23 Barkhuizen; J.G van As 2 & O.L.F Weyl 3 Yellowfish and Chiselmouths: Biodiversity Research and its conservation 24 implications - Emmanuel Vreven Should people be eating fish from the Olifants River, Limpopo Province? 25 – Sean Marr A review of the research findings on the Xikundu Fishway & the implications for 36 fishways in the future – Paul Fouche´ Report on the Vanderkloof Dam- Francois Fouche´ 48 Karoo Seekoei River Nature Reserve – P C Ferreira 50 Departmental report: Biomonitoring in the lower Orange River within the borders 54 of the Northern Cape Province – Peter Ramollo Free State Report – Leon Barkhuizen 65 Limpopo Report – Paul Fouche´ 68 Conference summary – Peter Mills 70 Discussion & Comment following
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Two: Study Areas with General Materials and Methods
    Chapter Two: Study Areas with General Materials and Methods 40 2 Study areas with general materials and methods 2.1 Introduction to study areas To reach the aims and objectives for this study, one lentic and one lotic system within the Vaal catchment had to be selected. The lentic component of the study involved a manmade lake or reservoir, suitable for this radio telemetry study. Boskop Dam, with GPS coordinates 26o33’31.17” (S), 27 o07’09.29” (E), was selected as the most representative (various habitats, size, location, fish species, accessibility) site for this radio telemetry study. For the lotic component of the study a representative reach of the Vaal River flowing adjacent to Wag ‘n Bietjie Eco Farm, with GPS coordinates 26°09’06.69” (S), 27°25’41.54” (E), was selected (Figure 3). Figure 3: Map of the two study areas within the Vaal River catchment, South Africa Boskop Dam Boskop manmade lake also known as Boskop Dam is situated 15 km north of Potchefstroom (Figure 4) in the Dr. Kenneth Kaunda District Municipality in the North West Province (Van Aardt and Erdmann, 2004). The dam is part of the Mooi River water scheme and is currently the largest reservoir built on the Mooi River (Koch, 41 1975). Apart from Boskop Dam, two other manmade lakes can be found on the Mooi River including Kerkskraal and Lakeside Dam (also known as Potchefstroom Dam). The Mooi River rises in the north near Koster and then flows south into Kerkskraal Dam which feeds Boskop Dam. Boskop Dam stabilises the flow of the Mooi River and two concrete canals convey water from the Boskop Dam to a large irrigation area.
    [Show full text]
  • THESIS Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER of SCIENCE of Rhodes University
    THE KARYOLOGY AND TAXONOMY OF THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN YELLOWFISH (PISCES: CYPRINIDAE) THESIS Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE of Rhodes University by LAWRENCE KEITH OELLERMANN December, 1988 ABSTRACT The southern African yellowfish (Barbus aeneus, ~ capensls, .!L. kimberleyensis, .!L. natalensis and ~ polylepis) are very similar, which limits the utility of traditional taxonomic methods. For this reason yellowfish similarities were explored using multivariate analysis and karyology. Meristic, morphometric and Truss (body shape) data were examined using multiple discriminant, principal component and cluster analyses. The morphological study disclosed that although the species were very similar two distinct groups occurred; .!L. aeneus-~ kimberleyensis and ~ capensis-~ polylepis-~ natalensis. Karyology showed that the yellowfish were hexaploid, ~ aeneus and IL... kimberleyensis having 148 chromosomes while the other three species had 150 chromosomes. Because the karyotypes of the species were variable the fundamental number for each species was taken as the median value for ten spreads. Median fundamental numbers were ~ aeneus ; 196, .!L. natalensis ; 200, ~ kimberleyensis ; 204, ~ polylepis ; 206 and ~ capensis ; 208. The lower chromosome number and higher fundamental number was considered the more apomorphic state for these species. Silver-staining of nucleoli showed that the yellowfish are probably undergoing the process of diploidization. Southern African Barbus and closely related species used for outgroup comparisons showed three levels of ploidy. The diploid species karyotyped were ~ anoplus (2N;48), IL... argenteus (2N;52), ~ trimaculatus (2N;42- 48), Labeo capensis (2N;48) and k umbratus (2N;48); the tetraploid species were B . serra (2N;102), ~ trevelyani (2N;±96), Pseudobarbus ~ (2N;96) and ~ burgi (2N;96); and the hexaploid species were ~ marequensis (2N;130-150) and Varicorhinus nelspruitensis (2N;130-148).
    [Show full text]
  • Hexaploidy in Yellowfish Species (Barbus, Pisces, Cyprinidae) from Southern Africa
    Journal of Fish Biology (1990) 37, 105-1 15 Hexaploidy in yellowfish species (Barbus, Pisces, Cyprinidae) from southern Africa L. K. OELLERMANNAND P. H. SICELTON* J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Private Bag 1015, Grahamstown 6140, Republic of South Africa (Received 18 July 1989, Accepted I February 1990) Five small-scaled yellowfish (large Burbus spp.) from southern Africa are shown to have modal 148 or 150chromosomes. Themajority ofcyprinid species have 2N = 50chromosomes, indicating that the yellowfish karyotype is hexaploid in origin. However, as there is no indication that the species are unisexual or that normal reproduction occurs by any means other than bisexual fertilization, the yellowfish karyotype is considered to have reverted to a diploid condition. Key words: karyology; yellowfish; Burbus; hexaploidy; southern Africa. I. INTRODUCTION The name ' yellowfish ' is given to several large-sized Burbus species in southern Africa (Jubb, 1967). The yellowfish fall into two groups on the basis of scale size. The group with smaller scales consists of five recognized species distributed in the Orange River system and adjacent drainage systems (Skelton, 1986). The second group, with larger scales, consists of two species, Barbus rnarequensis Smith, 1841 and Barbus codringtonii Boulenger, 1908, distributed in east coastal drainages from the Phongola River to the Zambezi River system. This study concerns the five small-scaled yellowfish species, viz. Barbus cupensis Smith, 1841 from the Olifants River system, Burbus aeneus (Burchell, 1822) and Burbus kimberleyensis Gilchrist & Thompson, 1913 from the Orange River system, Barbus polylepis Boulenger, 1907 from the Limpopo, lncomati and Phongola River systems, and Burbus natalensis Castelnau, 1861 from the rivers of Natal.
    [Show full text]