DOCSLIB.ORG

Ryan Terrance Chin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ryan Terrance Chin MOVING TOWARD SUBFEDERAL INVOLVEMENT IN FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW * Ryan Terrance Chin In Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that state governments could mandate compulsory enrollment in the otherwise voluntary federal E-Verify program. Though it deals primarily with employment of unauthorized workers, this case raises broader questions of the role of federalism in the current immigration regime. State and local entities continue to engage in immigration regulation because of their dissatisfaction with the federal approach and because of the impacts felt at the community levels. Looking to both the history of subfederal predominance and the current de facto tolerance of subfederal involvement provide perspective on the benefits of a system that contemplates a larger subfederal role. Using that as a launching point, this Comment proposes a new juridical approach in the hopes of allowing for greater subfederal involvement while protecting federal and individual interests. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1860 I. THE E-VERIFY CASES AND THE DIVERGENT PREEMPTION STANDARDS ............... 1865 A. The Continuing Vitality of De Canas and Its Definition of Immigration Regulation ............................................................................ 1866 1. Approach 1: IRCA Overrules De Canas and Brings Employment of Undocumented Immigrants Into Federal Immigration Regulation ........................................................................ 1867 a. Chamber of Commerce v. Henry/Chamber of Commerce v. Edmondson ............................................................ 1868 2. Approach 2: Explicit Preemption: IRCA Wholly Occupies Regulation of Undocumented Workers ................................................ 1869 a. Lozano v. City of Hazleton .............................................................. 1869 3. Approach 3: Explicit Authorization: Finding a Presumption Against Preemption ............................................................................... 1870 a. CPLC v. Napolitano ........................................................................ 1871 b. Gray v. City of Valley Park ............................................................. 1873 B. Subconstitutional Norms in Subfederal Immigration Law .......................... 1874 C. A Comprehensive Reading of the E-Verify Cases ....................................... 1877 * J.D., 2011, UCLA School of Law. I would like to thank my advisor, Hiroshi Motomura, for his tremendous guidance and advice. I would also like to express my gratitude for all of the support and encouragement from my professors, friends, and family. A special thanks to Feather Moy-Welsh, Phil Rucker, and Nicholas Woo for their feedback and advice. And, of course, a big thanks to the editorial staff of the UCLA Law Review. 1859 1860 58 UCLA LAW REVIEW 1859 (2011) II. THE HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF IMMIGRATION LAWS ................................ 1881 A. Pre-1875 State Immigration Regulations ..................................................... 1882 B. The End of Slavery and the Rise of the Federal Immigration Power as a Mechanism of Racial Domination ......................................................... 1886 III. VISIONS OF CONTEMPORARY SUBFEDERAL IMMIGRATION REGULATIONS .......... 1889 A. “Neutral” Regulations With an Impact on Immigration ............................. 1891 1. The Role of Community in Immigration Law ...................................... 1893 2. The Federal Immigration Power in Conjunction With Local Zoning Powers ........................................................................................ 1895 a. Modern-Day Examples ................................................................... 1895 b. Historical Development of the Zoning and Immigration Powers ................................................................ 1896 B. “Direct” Subfederal Regulation ..................................................................... 1899 C. “Indirect” Subfederal Regulations That Implicate the Federal Immigration Scheme ..................................................................................... 1902 1. Immigration Regulation Through Education Regulation .................... 1903 D. Understanding Our System as an Integration of Federal and Subfederal Powers ................................................................................... 1905 IV. A NEW ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK ...................................................................... 1906 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 1911 INTRODUCTION The rising frustration with the federal government’s policy on immigra- tion regulation is exemplified by the recent controversy surrounding Arizona Senate Bill 1070 (SB 1070). On April 13, 2010, the Arizona state House of Representatives passed SB 1070, which quickly became regarded as “the toughest measure in the country against illegal immigrants” because of its directive forcing local police to determine the immigration status of any indi- vidual they reasonably suspected was undocumented.1 All cities and agencies are required to comply with the bill and a citizen suit provision exists to compel performance.2 Many immigrants’ rights advocates were concerned that the bill would effectively sanction and mandate racial profiling.3 Nevertheless, Arizona state lawmakers defended the bill on the grounds that it regulated crime, kidnapping, drugs, and the use of social welfare programs.4 The bill received 1. Nicholas Riccardi, Arizona Passes Strict Illegal Immigration Act, L.A. TIMES, Apr. 13, 2010, at A1, available at http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/13/nation/la-na-arizona-immigration14-2010 apr14. 2. Id. 3. See, e.g., id. (citing Chris Newman, legal director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network). 4. Id. (citing John Kavanagh, Representative for Arizona). Toward Subfederal Immigration Law 1861 national media attention and placed immigration reform squarely in both the legal and public discourse.5 In turn, at least eighteen states and localities have considered measures similar to SB 1070.6 This Comment argues that the preva- lence of subfederal7 involvement in immigration regulation reflects the failures of the current immigration regime to address local interests. As a response, this Comment explores ways to alter the current system to better construct a judi- cial model that seeks to provide greater consistency and clarity in the context of federal preemption of subfederal immigration regulation. Since 2007, there has been a significant increase in local legislation concerning immigration.8 This increased subfederal involvement in immigra- tion regulation is a response to a federal regime that is widely believed to inadequately address local concerns.9 The validity of such regulation is legally complex because the U.S. Supreme Court has traditionally granted the federal 5. The Obama administration challenged the Arizona law in federal court. On July 28, 2010, a federal district court issued a preliminary injunction against the most controversial provisions of the law. The governor of Arizona immediately stated her intention to appeal the ruling. See Randal C. Archibold, Judge Blocks Arizona’s Immigration Law, N.Y. TIMES, July 28, 2010, at A1, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/29/us/29arizona.html?_r=2&scp=1&sq=judge%20arizona&st=cse. The talk surrounding the law has also been a point of national public discussion. See, e.g., Huma Khan, Immigration Debate: Number of City, State Bills Relating to Immigration Increase, ABC NEWS, Aug. 2, 2010, http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/immigration-debate-number-city-state-bills-relating- immigration/story?id=11220316. 6. The Associated Press reports that as many as eighteen states have expressed a desire to enact similar measures. See Bob Christie, Arizona Preparing Appeal of Immigration Ruling, WASH. TIMES, July 29, 2010, http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hZ8Gy51rOgX8-wDT3iq TGWw1uLiAD9H8O1A80. The National Conference of State Legislatures similarly reports that six states—Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and South Carolina—introduced bills similar to SB 1070. NAT’L CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES, 2010 IMMIGRATION-RELATED LAWS AND RESOLUTIONS IN THE STATES 1 (2010), available at http://www.ncsl.org/documents/immig/ 2010immigrationreport.pdf. 7. This Comment uses the word subfederal to refer to state and local government entities in contrast with the federal government. 8. See NAT’L CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES, 2009 STATE LAWS RELATED TO IMMIGRANTS AND IMMIGRATION JANUARY 1–DECEMBER 31, 2009 (2009), available at http:// www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=19232 (finding the number of state laws enacted growing from 84 in 2006, to 240 in 2007, to 206 in 2008). 9. See Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc. v. Napolitano (CPLC), 544 F.3d 976, 979 (9th Cir. 2008) (stating that the challenged law reflected “rising frustration with the United States Congress’s failure to enact comprehensive immigration reform”), aff’d sub nom. Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, 131 S. Ct. 1968 (2011); Kris W. Kobach, The Quintessential Force Multiplier: The Inherent Authority of Local Police to Make Immigration Arrests, 69 ALB. L. REV. 179, 181 (2005) (advocating local enforcement because it aids federal enforcement); Cristina M. Rodríguez, The Significance of the Local in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Boundaries of State and Local Power to Regulate Illegal Immigration
    Pepperdine Law Review Volume 39 Issue 2 Article 5 1-15-2012 Testing the Borders: The Boundaries of State and Local Power to Regulate Illegal Immigration Brittney M. Lane Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr Part of the Immigration Law Commons, and the Jurisdiction Commons Recommended Citation Brittney M. Lane Testing the Borders: The Boundaries of State and Local Power to Regulate Illegal Immigration , 39 Pepp. L. Rev. Iss. 2 (2013) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol39/iss2/5 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Caruso School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pepperdine Law Review by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. DO NOT DELETE 2/8/2012 3:20 PM Testing the Borders: The Boundaries of State and Local Power to Regulate Illegal Immigration I. INTRODUCTION II. DEFINING THE BORDERS: THE HISTORICAL BOUNDARIES OF STATE AND FEDERAL IMMIGRATION POWERS A. This Land Is My Land: Immigration Power from the Colonial Era to the Constitution B. This Land Is Your Land: Federalizing Immigration Power C. A Hole in the Federal Fence: State Police Power Revisited 1. De Canas v. Bica and the State’s Power to Regulate Local Employment of Illegal Immigrants 2. Plyler v. Doe and Further Recognition that Legitimate State Interests Might Militate in Favor of Allowing State Regulation III. BUILDING THE BORDERS THROUGH STATUTORY REGULATION OF IMMIGRATION IV.
    [Show full text]
  • US V. Wong Kim
    U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark: ​ Barred From His Homeland, One Chinese American’s Fight for Birthright Citizenship By August Neumann Word Count: 2488 Landmark United States Supreme Court cases are ingrained in the minds of many Americans, shaping their view of history; a history known for its tumults and hypocrisies, yet remaining a hopeful memoir steeped in the pursuit of liberty for all people. Belonging in the midst of cases as pivotal and transformative in America's story as Marbury v. Madison or Brown ​ ​ ​ v. Board of Education is a more obscure Supreme Court case: the 1897 case of United States v. ​ ​ Wong Kim Ark. Although cardinal in its decision regarding birthright citizenship for people of all ​ races, the case has largely been overlooked. To effectively analyze this neglected, but important piece of history, one must understand what life was like in America for Chinese immigrants in the late 1800s and how Wong Kim Ark found his way to the U.S. Supreme Court to ultimately defend his right to citizenship. What did U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark do for Chinese communities, if ​ ​ anything, and did it change the way they participated in the social and civic life in California and the broader U.S.? Lastly, where does birthright citizenship stand today? The decision secured birthright citizenship for Chinese Americans, but whether it helped them benefit from that citizenship remains unclear. Life for Wong Kim Ark and Chinese Immigrants Prior to the Case Most Chinese immigrants came in the early 1850s from the Pearl River Delta region in China, a densely populated region that today encompasses Hong Kong, Guangzhou, and Macao1.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S3451
    May 26, 2011 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S3451 SUBMITTED RESOLUTIONS Mink, the first Asian-American Congress- (2) encourages the celebration during woman, and Norman Y. Mineta, the first Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month of Asian-American member of a presidential the significant contributions Asian-Ameri- SENATE RESOLUTION 200—RECOG- cabinet, have made significant strides in the cans and Pacific Islanders have made to the NIZING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF political and military realms; United States; and THE DESIGNATION OF THE Whereas the Presidential Cabinet of the (3) recognizes that the Asian-American and Obama Administration includes a record 3 Pacific Islander community strengthens and MONTH OF MAY AS ASIAN/PA- Asian-Americans, including Secretary of En- enhances the rich diversity of the United CIFIC AMERICAN HERITAGE ergy Steven Chu, Secretary of Commerce States. MONTH Gary Locke, and Secretary of Veterans Af- f Mr. AKAKA (for himself, Mr. INOUYE, fairs Eric Shinseki; Whereas in 2011, the Congressional Asian SENATE RESOLUTION 201—EX- Mrs. MURRAY, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr. Pacific American Caucus, a bicameral cau- PRESSING THE REGRET OF THE REID of Nevada) submitted the fol- cus of Members of Congress advocating on SENATE FOR THE PASSAGE OF lowing resolution; which was referred behalf of Asian-Americans and Pacific Is- DISCRIMINATORY LAWS to the Committee on the Judiciary: landers, includes 30 Members of Congress; AGAINST THE CHINESE IN AMER- S. RES. 200 Whereas Asian-Americans and Pacific Is- ICA, INCLUDING THE CHINESE Whereas each May, the people of the landers have made history by assuming of- EXCLUSION ACT fice in a number of new and historically sig- United States join together to pay tribute to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • A City to Model Six Proposals for Protecting Public Safety and Improving Relationships Between Immigrant Communities and the City of New Haven
    A City to Model Six Proposals for Protecting Public Safety and Improving Relationships Between Immigrant Communities and the City of New Haven Junta for Progressive Action, Inc. and Unidad Latina en Acción New Haven, Connecticut October, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………..…………………………………………………………………………iv ABOUT THE ORGANIZATIONS THAT COMMISSIONED THIS REPORT………………….……….…v FOREWARD………………………………………………………………………………………………………...vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………………………….1 THE PROPOSALS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…3 Proposal 1: Providing Access to New Haven Bank Accounts…………………………………………...3 Federal Statutes and Regulations………….…………………………………………………………..3 Connecticut Statutes and Regulations…………………………………………………………………4 Current Bank Practices……………………………………………………………………………….….4 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………………...…..4 Proposal 2: Creating a Municipal Identification Card for the City of New Haven………………….5 Connecticut Statutes and Municipal Identification……………………………………………..…..5 Other U.S. Cities………………………………………………………………………………..…………6 Federal Law………………………………………………………………………………………………..6 Protection of Data…………………………………………………………………………………………7 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………………….…8 Proposal 3: Developing a Policy Barring New Haven Police Involvement in Federal Immigration Issues…………………………………………………………………………..………9 Federal Power vs. Local Authority: Who Is Responsible for Immigration Enforcement?.........9 Post-9/11: New Roles for a New Era? …………………………………………………………………9 Local Police Enforcing Federal Law: Who Bears
    [Show full text]
  • Establish Municipal ID
    JULY 2015 BUILDING IDENTITY A Toolkit for Designing and Implementing a Successful Municipal ID Program Acknowledgements This toolkit reflects the deep knowledge and expertise of dozens of advocates and community members who have been personally involved in starting municipal ID card programs in their own cities. CPD is especially grateful to the members of the IDNYC coalition, whose work formed the basis for much of this report. In particular, Make the Road New York, the Immigrant Defense Project, the New Economy Project, New York Legal Assistance Group, the New York Civil Liberties Union, and Picture the Homeless provided invaluable support. CPD would also like to thank SEIU 32BJ for sharing insights and feedback. Finally, this toolkit would not have been possible without Olena Savytska and Julina Guo, who conducted significant research for this project and assisted with early drafting for several sections. ABOUT THE CENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY The Center for Popular Democracy (CPD) works to create equity, opportunity and a dynamic democracy in partnership with high-impact base-building organizations, organizing alliances, and progressive unions. CPD strengthens our collective capacity to envision and win an innovative pro-worker, pro-immigrant, racial and economic justice agenda. Cover photo: In the summer of 2012, in a tribute to the Freedom Rides of the civil rights movement, dozens of undocumented youth rode the “undocubus” through some of the most anti-immigrant states in the southern U.S. in protest of mass deportation and family separation. Throughout the tour they engaged in direct action, including civil disobedience, to bring attention to the situation of immigrant communities living in this country without documentation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anti-Immigrant "New Mediascape": Analyzing Nativist Discourse on the Web
    The Anti-Immigrant "New Mediascape": Analyzing Nativist Discourse on the Web Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Costley, William F. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 01:14:26 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/332850 THE ANTI-IMMIGRANT “NEW MEDIASCAPE”: ANALYZING NATIVIST DISCOURSE ON THE WEB by William Costley ____________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF SPANISH AND PORTUGUESE In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WITH A MAJOR IN SPANISH In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2014 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by William F. Costley, titled The Anti-Immigrant “New Mediascape”: Analyzing Nativist Discourse on the Web and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _____________________________________________________ Date: July 24, 2014 Dr. Javier D. Duran _____________________________________________________ Date: July 24, 2014 Dr. Laura Gutiérrez _____________________________________________________ Date: July 24, 2014 Dr. Melissa A. Fitch Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of the Eligible Undocumented New Yorker's State Constitutional Right to Public Benefits
    IN DEFENSE OF THE ELIGIBLE UNDOCUMENTED NEW YORKER'S STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO PUBLIC BENEFITS STEVEN SACCO ABSTRACT Under current New York State law, undocumented New Yorkers, (those residing in the U.S. without the federal government's permission), are ineligible for most state-funded means-tested public benefits, such as Medicaid and Safety Net Assistance. Articles XVII and I of the New York State Constitution nonetheless create a state mandate to provide for the eligible "needy" and ensure equal protection under the law, respectively. This article proposes that, under these state constitutional provisions, financially eligible undocumented residents of New York State possess an affirmative right to receive state-funded public benefits. Policy arguments against this entitlement are unfounded and barriers to enforcement of the right of undocumented New Yorkers to access state benefits are born of politics, not of the law. I. INTRODUCTION ................................................. 183 II. Low-INCOME UNDOCUMENTED NEW YORKERS FACE SEVERE POVERTY AND EARLY DEATH WITHOUT ACCESS TO PUBLIC BENEFITS ...... ...... 186 III. NEW YORK STATE DENIES UNDOCUMENTED NEW YORKERS SOME STATE- FUNDED PUBLIC BENEFITS ..................................... 191 A. The New York State Constitution Creates a Right to Public Benefits..... 191 B. Most State-Funded Public Benefits in New York State Are Denied to Undocumented New Yorkers .............................. 193 IV. ARTICLE XVII, SECTION 1 OF THE NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTION CREATES A RIGHT TO PUBLIC BENEFITS FOR "NEEDY" NON-CITIZEN RESIDENTS, REGARDLESS OF THEIR IMMIGRATION STATUS.......................196 A. Despite the Influential Holding of the Court of Appeals in Aliessa v. Novello, Scholarship on the Topic Does Not Discuss Aliessa's Implications for Undocumented New Yorkers ............
    [Show full text]
  • New Brunswick Community Food Assessment
    New Brunswick Community Food Assessment Working Together for a Food Secure New Brunswick Editors Kathe Newman Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy Ralph W. Voorhees Center for Civic Engagement Cara Cuite Department of Human Ecology, Rutgers Cooperative Extension Erin Royals Doctoral student, Geography Department Rutgers University September 2017 Preface Mark Winne, Senior Advisor at the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future Imagine walking into a poorly lit and cluttered attic. You’re trying to find some boxes you carefully set aside over the past several years filled with kitchen utensils and plates that you now want to give to a relative. But your memory deceives you as you trip over accumulated containers and used pieces of furniture. Much to your consternation, that neat and tidy space you thought you knew so well grows murky and impenetrable. You discover things you forgot you had and fail to find the things you want. But rather than stomp out in frustration, you resolve to install brighter lights, make a proper inventory and diagram, and enlist your family members in a coordinated reordering of what has become a confusing and inefficient space. Food systems are much like cluttered attics. Just when we thought we knew who has enough good food and who doesn’t, new information emerges that alters our understanding of hunger and healthy eating. When we thought we had an accurate idea of the places where people get food, grow food, and learn about food, a new food pantry or farmers market opens, somewhere else a supermarket closes, or a new federal or state food program begins.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 KITAGAWA OTSURU.Indd
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kansai University Repository U. S. Immigration Reform in a Historical Perspective 著者 Kitagawa Otsuru Chieko journal or Kansai University Review of Law and Politics publication title volume 38 page range 1-20 year 2017-03 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10112/10978 1 U. S. Immigration Reform in a Historical Perspective Chieko KITAGAWA OTSURU＊ Introduction 1. The State of Undocumented Immigrants 2. Failed Efforts in Past Congresses 3. Political Struggles Between Actors Conclusion Introduction Donald Trump, who had never served in any elected or appointed positions at any level of government, was elected as the 2016 Republican presidential candidate, then elected as the 45th President of the United States, predominantly reflecting the dissatisfaction of white working-class voters. Many of these voters feel that they have been left out of American politics, as mainstream Republican candidates during the primaries, along with Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, targeted the emerging groups of voters, most of whom are minorities. Trump attracted an unexpectedly large number of voters, including many who traditionally supported the Democrat, with his proposals to build a wall along the Mexican border to be financed by the Mexican Government, to bar immigrants from any countries that harbor “terrorists,” and to have allies pay for the security provided to them by American forces. The fact that he narrowly defeated Clinton by taking the battleground states that suffered most in the economic downturn with his extremist rhetoric suggests that immigration issues will continue to take priority on the political agenda in the next administration.
    [Show full text]
  • US Immigration
    BUSHELL (DO NOT DELETE) 5/29/2013 2:45 PM “Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Huddled Masses”—Just as Long as They Fit the Heteronormative Ideal: U.S. Immigration Law’s Exclusionary & Inequitable Treatment of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered, and Queer Migrants Logan Bushell* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 674 II. IMMIGRATION & SEXUALITY: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF REGULATING SEXUALITY AT THE BORDER .......................................... 677 A. 1875-1917: Establishing a Foundational Blueprint for Exclusion of LGBTQ Migrants .................................................... 678 B. 1917-1990: Adherence to the Blueprint for Exclusion of LGBTQ Migrants ......................................................................... 680 III. REFUGE IN THE COURTHOUSE? THE JUDICIARY’S APPROACH TO EXCLUSIONARY IMMIGRATION LAWS & POLICIES .............................. 683 A. Boutilier v. INS: Not Welcome—The Judiciary’s Sanctioning of Exclusionary Immigration Laws & Policies ............................ 683 B. Hill v. INS: An Inclusionary Olive Branch from the Judiciary ... 685 IV. TWO STEPS FORWARD, TWO STEPS BACK: PROGRESSIVE MEASURES PROVE MERELY PRETEXTUAL ........................................... 687 A. No Longer Categorically Excluded, but Certainly Not Included: Dismissing LGBTQ Persons from Family Unification ................................................................................... 687 B. Defense of Marriage Act: Deciding Exactly Who
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration Policies and the Reduction of Prejudice
    Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 3-2012 Regrouping America: Immigration Policies and the Reduction of Prejudice Fatma E. Marouf Texas A&M University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Fatma E. Marouf, Regrouping America: Immigration Policies and the Reduction of Prejudice, 15 Harv. Latino L. Rev. 129 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/746 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REGROUPING AMERICA: IMMIGRATION POLICIES AND THE REDUCTION OF PREJUDICE Fatma E. Marouf TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................. 130 1. CONSTRUCTING Fuzzy CATEGORIES BASED ON IMMIGRATION STATUS AND THE POROUS BOUNDARIES BETWEEN THEM .... 133 II. SOCIAL CATEGORIZATION AND INTERGROUP RELATIONS ..... 138 A. The Relationship Between Social Categorization and Intergroup Bias, and Intergroup Conflict .............. 138 B. Categorization-BasedStrategies for Reducing Intergroup Bias .... ....................................... 142 III. EXAMINING U.S. IMMIGRATION POLICIES THROUGH THE LENS OF CATEGORIZATION-BASED STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING INTERGROUP BIAS ........................... ............ 144 A. Decategorization
    [Show full text]
  • Public Hearings and Meetings
    VOLUME CXLIII NUMBER 26 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2016 Price: $4.00 Education . 447 Environmental Protection �������������������������� 447 THE CITY RECORD TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineering Design and Construction � � 447 BILL DE BLASIO Fire Department . 447 Mayor PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETINGS Human Resources Administration . 447 City Council . 441 LISETTE CAMILO Office of Labor Relations ���������������������������� 448 Commissioner, Department of Citywide City Planning Commission . 442 Agency Chief Contracting Officer � � � � � � 448 Administrative Services Community Boards . 442 Parks and Recreation ���������������������������������� 448 Board of Correction . 443 Contracts� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 448 ELI BLACHMAN Editor, The City Record Employees' Retirement System ������������������ 443 Transportation �������������������������������������������� 448 Franchise and Concession Review Bridges � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 448 Published Monday through Friday except legal Committee . 443 Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority . 449 holidays by the New York City Department of Landmarks Preservation Commission . 443 Citywide Administrative Services under Authority CONTRACT AWARD HEARINGS of Section 1066 of the New York City Charter. PROPERTY DISPOSITION Education . 449 Subscription $500 a year, $4.00 daily ($5.00 by Citywide Administrative Services �������������� 444 mail). Periodicals Postage Paid at New York, N.Y. AGENCY RULES Office of Citywide Procurement � � � � � � � � 444 POSTMASTER: Send address
    [Show full text]