Magspring12.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Magspring12.Pdf BIRD CONSERVATION The Magazine of American Bird Conservancy Spring 2012 BIRD’S EYE VIEW On the EDGE “In the ecstasy of homecoming, the curlew now hardly remembered that for three summers past he had been mysteriously alone and the mating fire within had burned itself out unquenched…” Fred Bodsworth, Last of the Curlews ost – but certainly not all – shorebirds spend extinction. The Mountain Plover’s grassland habitats – and critical parts of their lives on the thin edge thus the bird – are disappearing as native grasslands are Mwhere sea meets land. Unfortunately for them, converted to marginal agriculture. Habitat loss, possibly and for those of us who love shorebirds, this is also where in combination with pesticide poisoning, may cause the people like to be. Buff-breasted Sandpiper to disappear over the horizon to another Heaven and another Earth too. This continuing, intense competition between man and nature at the shoreline is not going well for nature. Many shorebirds, whose numbers seemed beyond affecting Around the world, man is gaining the edge: building just a few years ago, are now disappearing before our eyes. houses; polluting; filling wetlands (such as the invaluable Sanderlings – those birds we watched doggedly chasing the Saemangeum wetlands on the coast of South Korea, home tide up and down the beach when we were children: way to millions of wintering shorebirds, including, perhaps, down (no more happy patter of little feet). Piping Plovers? our own bar-tailed Godwit); vainly hardening shorelines Around 6,500 left. as sea level rises; and damaging habitat with off-road Many birders I speak with tell me they steer clear of shore- vehicles, invasive, alien plants, and flotsam. It really isn’t birds: too hard to identify, they say. Most birders can walk going that well for man either, now that I think of it. out their front door and start to watch landbirds every day, But “shorebirds” is really a misnomer, since so many spe- but shorebirds are out on the edge of their imagination, in cies in this group spend much or all of their time else- a faraway and, for some, even forbidding place. So, why where, such as Upland Sandpipers nesting in grasslands, care? The answers to this are many, and you have heard yellowlegs in the Boreal Forest, and Eskimo Curlews in them before: we are borrowing from our children, we history. should adhere to the precautionary principle, maintain the intrinsic values of biodiversity, and the interconnectedness Yes, the Eskimo Curlew is gone forever, and in the words of all life. of American naturalist William Beebe, “Another Heaven and another Earth must pass before such a one can be I say care to save shorebirds because we can. Read the again.” The last individual seen in North America was in articles in this issue and learn how. It just takes will; yours 1962 on the edge at Galveston island, texas, and the abso- and mine. lute last confirmed Eskimo Curlew was shot in Barbados the following year. Other shorebirds such as the rufa Red Knot may follow the eskimo curlew into extinction. Even those species that avoid the land/water ecotone George H. Fenwick altogether can be on or near the edge of survival and President, american bird conservancy COVER PHOTO: American Oystercatcher: Judd Patterson/Birds In Focus 2 bird conservation • sPRING 2012 Bird Conservation is the magazine of American Bird Conservancy (ABC), BIRD Conservation and is published three times yearly. Mountain Plover: Greg Lavaty_www.texastargetbirds.com American Bird Conservancy (ABC) is the SPRING 2012 only 501(c)(3) organization that works solely to conserve native wild birds and their habitats throughout the Americas. A copy of the current financial statement SAVING SHOREBIRDS and registration filed by the organization may be obtained by contacting: ABC, P.O. Box 249, The Plains, VA 20198. Tel: (540) 253-5780, or by contacting the following 8 Recovering Shorebird in the Americas state agencies: Florida: Division of Consumer Services, toll-free number within the State: 11 Threats to Shorebirds 800-435-7352. Maryland: For the cost of copies and postage: Office of the Secretary of State, 14 Shorebirds Use Diverse Habitats Statehouse, Annapolis, MD 21401. New Jersey: Attorney General, State of New Jersey: 201-504-6259. 16 Far from Shore, But Up A Creek New York: Office of the Attorney General, Department of Law, Charities Bureau, 120 Broadway, New York, NY 10271. Pennsylvania: Department of State, 18 Among the Islands: Laguna Madre toll-free number within the state: Black Skimmer: Alan Wilson 800-732-0999. Virginia: State Division of Consumer 20 Beach-nesting Bird Conservation Affairs, Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services, P.O. Box 1163, Richmond, VA 23209. West Virginia: Secretary of State, State 22 Reserve Profile:e l cercado, Mexico Capitol, Charleston, WV 25305. Registration does not imply endorsement, approval, or recommendation by any state. 25 Planned Giving American Bird Conservancy is not responsible for unsolicited manuscripts or photographs. Approval is required Monarchs of the Mud-Probers for reproduction of any photographs or 26 artwork. Editors: George Fenwick, Jack Morrison, Merrie Morrison, Gemma Radko, Gavin Shire, George E. Wallace DEPARTMENTS Long-billed Curlew: Tom Grey ABC’s Bird Conservation magazine brings you the best in bird conservation news and features. 2 Bird’s Eye View For more information contact: On The Wire American Bird Conservancy Pectoral Sandpiper: Greg Homel, 4 4249 Loudoun Avenue Natural Elements Productions P.O. Box 249 Species Profile The Plains, VA 20198 28 540-253-5780 diademed sandpiper-Plover Web: www.abcbirds.org Email: [email protected] Diademed Sandpiper-Plover: Dubi Shapiro Scan to check out ABC’s bird conservation • sPRING 2012 3 new mobile website! ON the WIRE Endangered Black-backed Thornbill Found at El Dorado Reserve in Colombia n December 2011, biologists Black-backed Thornbills have very working with ABC partner short, slightly downward-curving IFundación Proaves observed and bills and purplish-black, forked tails. photographed a Black-backed Thorn- Males are mostly black above, while bill at the El Dorado Reserve. This females are bronzy-green above and hummingbird species, classified as whitish below, speckled with green on Male Black-backed Thornbill: Fundación ProAves globally endangered, is found only in the throat and sides. the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta of “This rare little bird is a gem and will the Black-backed Thornbill and many Colombia in humid and elfin forests, undoubtedly bring more attention other endemic species, such as the bush-covered slopes near the tree line, to the fantastic El Dorado Reserve,” santa Marta Parakeet, santa Marta and in páramo (high-altitude grass- said Benjamin Skolnik, Conservation Sabrewing, and Santa Marta Bush- land). the bird’s already small range is Project specialist with american bird Tyrant. shrinking drastically due to rampant Conservancy. “You can add one more deforestation, overgrazing, and burn- abc is presently supporting Proaves’ to a long list of endemic, threatened ing. Its population is suspected to be efforts to acquire another key tract species you could see there.” in decline due to this ongoing habitat of land to add to the reserve, where loss, making the sighting of this indi- The El Dorado Bird Reserve protects palm trees used by the Santa Marta vidual at El Dorado significant. over 2,000 acres of critical habitat for Parakeet grow. New Government Initiative Will Benefit Golden-winged Warblers new program called “Work- and the opportunity it provides to monitoring to benefit the Golden- ing Lands for Wildlife” better engage private landowners winged Warbler. An education cam- A (WLW), unveiled in March in conservation. If we are going to paign will improve understanding of 2012 by the U.S. Departments of the have this bird around for future the importance of young forests and Interior and Agriculture, will provide generations, we’re going to need scrubby, open habitat to this bird,” a huge boost for Golden-winged public and private collaboration,” smith explained. Warbler conservation in the east- said Brian Smith, ABC’s AMJV abc has already made the Golden- ern United States, involving dozens Coordinator. winged Warbler a major focus of its of organizations across ten states, The WLW initiative will focus on conservation, and is continuing to including federal and state agencies, creating and maintaining the types of coordinate conservation measures in universities, and not-for-profit con- habitat necessary to sustain popula- both the United States and on the servation organizations. This effort is tions of warblers in and around their bird’s wintering grounds in Central being facilitated by the Appalachian current breeding areas, particularly and South America. Mountains Joint venture (aMJv) young forest. This will include and ABC. efforts designed to also increase “The Golden-winged Warbler is one the amount of available habitat of the most seriously threatened, throughout the Appalachians. non-federally listed species in “The additional funding from eastern North America. Everyone the WLW project will provide for familiar with its plight will be increased on-the-ground habitat excited about the WLW project restoration, conservation, and 4 bird conservation • sPRING 2012 Photo by Laura Erickson Protecting the Red Knot in South America he rufa red Knot has expe- rienced alarming declines in Trecent decades — from well over 100,000 in the early 1990s to about 40,000 today — and is now in real danger of extinction within the next ten years. Populations of long-distance migrant Red Knots, which winter on Tierra del Fuego in southernmost South America, are of particular concern, having dropped from more than 50,000 in 1985 to fewer than 15,000 today. With nu- merous partners, ABC has advocated The campaign’s logo, seen on for the protection of one of the knot’s The Red Knot mascot, called Fabién Rojizo after a essential food sources – the eggs of buttons, bumper stickers, and biplane pilot in a novel by Antoine de Saint Exupery, horseshoe crabs, the laying of which is a popular figure around San Antonio Bay, Argentina.
Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Reanalysis of Strauch's Osteological Data Set for The
    TheCondor97:174-196 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1995 PHYLOGENETIC REANALYSIS OF STRAUCH’S OSTEOLOGICAL DATA SET FOR THE CHARADRIIFORMES PHILIP c. CHU Department of Biology and Museum of Zoology The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Abstract. Strauch’s (1978) compatibility analysisof relationshipsamong the shorebirds (Charadriifonnes) was the first study to examine the full range of charadriifonn taxa in a reproducibleway. SubsequentlyMickevich and Parenti (1980) leveled seriouscharges against Strauch’s characters,method of phylogenetic inference, and results. To account for these charges,Strauch ’s characterswere re-examined and recoded, and parsimony analyseswere performed on the revised matrix. A parsimony analysison 74 taxa from the revised matrix yielded 855 shortesttrees, each length = 286 and consistencyindex = 0.385. In each shortest tree there were two major lineages,a lineageof sandpiper-likebirds and a lineageof plover- like birds; the two formed a monophyletic group, with the auks (Alcidae) being that group’s sister taxon. The shortest trees were then compared with other estimates of shorebird re- lationships, comparison suggestingthat the chargesagainst Strauch’s results may have re- sulted from the Mickevich and Parenti decisions to exclude much of Strauch’s character evidence. Key words: Charadrilformes; phylogeny; compatibility analysis: parsimony analysis; tax- onomic congruence. INTRODUCTION Strauch scored 227 charadriiform taxa for 70 The investigation of evolutionary relationships characters. Sixty-three of the characters were among shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) has a taken from either the skull or postcranial skel- long history (reviewed in Sibley and Ahlquist eton; the remaining seven involved the respec- 1990). Almost all studies used morphology to tive origins of three neck muscles, as published make inferences about shared ancestry; infer- in Burton (1971, 1972, 1974) and Zusi (1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Population Analysis and Community Workshop for Far Eastern Curlew Conservation Action in Pantai Cemara, Desa Sungai Cemara – Jambi
    POPULATION ANALYSIS AND COMMUNITY WORKSHOP FOR FAR EASTERN CURLEW CONSERVATION ACTION IN PANTAI CEMARA, DESA SUNGAI CEMARA – JAMBI Final Report Small Grant Fund of the EAAFP Far Eastern Curlew Task Force Iwan Febrianto, Cipto Dwi Handono & Ragil S. Rihadini Jambi, Indonesia 2019 The aim of this project are to Identify the condition of Far Eastern Curlew Population and the remaining potential sites for Far Eastern Curlew stopover in Sumatera, Indonesia and protect the remaining stopover sites for Far Eastern Curlew by educating the government, local people and community around the sites as the effort of reducing the threat of habitat degradation, habitat loss and human disturbance at stopover area. INTRODUCTION The Far Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariencis) is the largest shorebird in the world and is endemic to East Asian – Australian Flyway. It is one of the Endangered migratory shorebird with estimated global population at 38.000 individual, although a more recent update now estimates the population at 32.000 (Wetland International, 2015 in BirdLife International, 2017). An analysis of monitoring data collected from around Australia and New Zealand (Studds et al. in prep. In BirdLife International, 2017) suggests that the species has declined much more rapidly than was previously thought; with an annual rate of decline of 0.058 equating to a loss of 81.7% over three generations. Habitat loss occuring as a result of development is the most significant threat currently affecting migratory shorebird along the EAAF (Melville et al. 2016 in EAAFP 2017). Loss of habitat at critical stopover sites in the Yellow Sea is suspected to be the key threat to this species and given that it is restricted to East Asian - Australasian Flyway, the declines in the non-breeding are to be representative of the global population.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Plover Responses to Plague in Montana Stephen J
    Natural Resource Ecology and Management Natural Resource Ecology and Management Publications 2-2010 Mountain Plover Responses to Plague in Montana Stephen J. Dinsmore Iowa State University, [email protected] Mark D. Smith Auburn University Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/nrem_pubs Part of the Animal Diseases Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Ornithology Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ nrem_pubs/35. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resource Ecology and Management at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resource Ecology and Management Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mountain Plover Responses to Plague in Montana Abstract Plague is a bacterial (Yersinia pestis) disease that causes epizootic die-offs in black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) populations in the North American Great Plains. Through their grazing and burrowing, prairie dogs modify vegetation and landscape structure on their colonies in ways that affect other grassland species. Plague epizootics on prairie dog colonies can have indirect effects on species associated with colonies. The mountain plover (Charadrius montanus) preferentially nests on black-tailed prairie dog colonies and is thus negatively impacted by the loss of prairie dogs. We studied the effects of plague and colony spatial characteristics on the occupancy of 81 prairie dog colonies by nesting plovers in Phillips County, Montana, during a 13-year period (1995–2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa Haemastica) at Orielton Lagoon, Tasmania, 09/03/2018
    Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemastica) at Orielton Lagoon, Tasmania, 09/03/2018 Peter Vaughan and Andrea Magnusson E: T: Introduction: This submission pertains to the observation and identification of a single Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemastica) at Orielton Lagoon, Tasmania, on the afternoon of the 9th of March 2018. The bird was observed in the company of 50 Bar-tailed Godwits (Limosa lapponica) and a single Black-tailed Godwit (Limosa limosa), and both comparative and diagnostic features were used to differentiate it from these species. Owing to the recognised difficulties in differentiating similar species of wading birds, this submission makes a detailed analysis of the features used to identify the godwit in question. If accepted, this sighting would represent the eighth confirmed record of this species in Australia, and the second record of this species in Tasmania. Sighting and Circumstances: The godwit in question was observed on the western side of Orielton Lagoon in Tasmania, at approximately 543440 E 5262330 N, GDA 94, 55G. This location is comprised of open tidal mudflats abutted by Sarcicornia sp. saltmarsh, and is a well- documented roosting and feeding site for Bar-tailed Godwits and several other species of wading bird. This has included, for the past three migration seasons, a single Black-tailed Godwit (extralimital at this location) associating with the Bar-tailed Godwit flock. The Hudsonian Godwit was observed for approximately 37 minutes, between approximately 16:12 and 16:49, although the mixed flock of Bar-tailed Godwits and Black-tailed Godwits was observed for 55 minutes prior to this time. The weather during observation was clear skies (1/8 cloud cover), with a light north- easterly breeze and relatively warm temperatures (wind speed nor exact temperature recorded).
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • N° English Name Scientific Name Status Day 1
    1 FUNDACIÓN JOCOTOCO CHECK-LIST OF THE BIRDS OF YANACOCHA N° English Name Scientific Name Status Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 1 Tawny-breasted Tinamou Nothocercus julius R 2 Curve-billed Tinamou Nothoprocta curvirostris U 3 Torrent Duck Merganetta armata 4 Andean Teal Anas andium 5 Andean Guan Penelope montagnii U 6 Sickle-winged Guan Chamaepetes goudotii 7 Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis 8 Black Vulture Coragyps atratus 9 Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura 10 Andean Condor Vultur gryphus R Sharp-shinned Hawk (Plain- 11 breasted Hawk) Accipiter striatus U 12 Swallow-tailed Kite Elanoides forficatus 13 Black-and-chestnut Eagle Spizaetus isidori 14 Cinereous Harrier Circus cinereus 15 Roadside Hawk Rupornis magnirostris 16 White-rumped Hawk Parabuteo leucorrhous 17 Black-chested Buzzard-Eagle Geranoaetus melanoleucus U 18 White-throated Hawk Buteo albigula R 19 Variable Hawk Geranoaetus polyosoma U 20 Andean Lapwing Vanellus resplendens VR 21 Rufous-bellied Seedsnipe Attagis gayi 22 Upland Sandpiper Bartramia longicauda R 23 Baird's Sandpiper Calidris bairdii VR 24 Andean Snipe Gallinago jamesoni FC 25 Imperial Snipe Gallinago imperialis U 26 Noble Snipe Gallinago nobilis 27 Jameson's Snipe Gallinago jamesoni 28 Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularius 29 Band-tailed Pigeon Patagoienas fasciata FC 30 Plumbeous Pigeon Patagioenas plumbea 31 Common Ground-Dove Columbina passerina 32 White-tipped Dove Leptotila verreauxi R 33 White-throated Quail-Dove Zentrygon frenata U 34 Eared Dove Zenaida auriculata U 35 Barn Owl Tyto alba 36 White-throated Screech-Owl Megascops
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List
    Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List The target species list (species to be surveyed) should not change over the course of the study, therefore determining the target species list is an important project design task. Because waterbirds, including shorebirds, can occur in very high numbers in a census area, it is often not possible to count all species without compromising the quality of the survey data. For the basic shorebird census program (protocol 1), we recommend counting all shorebirds (sub-Order Charadrii), all raptors (hawks, falcons, owls, etc.), Common Ravens, and American Crows. This list of species is available on our field data forms, which can be downloaded from this site, and as a drop-down list on our online data entry form. If a very rare species occurs on a shorebird area survey, the species will need to be submitted with good documentation as a narrative note with the survey data. Project goals that could preclude counting all species include surveys designed to search for color-marked birds or post- breeding season counts of age-classed bird to obtain age ratios for a species. When conducting a census, you should identify as many of the shorebirds as possible to species; sometimes, however, this is not possible. For example, dowitchers often cannot be separated under censuses conditions, and at a distance or under poor lighting, it may not be possible to distinguish some species such as small Calidris sandpipers. We have provided codes for species combinations that commonly are reported on censuses. Combined codes are still species-specific and you should use the code that provides as much information as possible about the potential species combination you designate.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Chile a Photo Guide
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be 88 distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical 89 means without prior written permission of the publisher. WALKING WATERBIRDS unmistakable, elegant wader; no similar species in Chile SHOREBIRDS For ID purposes there are 3 basic types of shorebirds: 6 ‘unmistakable’ species (avocet, stilt, oystercatchers, sheathbill; pp. 89–91); 13 plovers (mainly visual feeders with stop- start feeding actions; pp. 92–98); and 22 sandpipers (mainly tactile feeders, probing and pick- ing as they walk along; pp. 99–109). Most favor open habitats, typically near water. Different species readily associate together, which can help with ID—compare size, shape, and behavior of an unfamiliar species with other species you know (see below); voice can also be useful. 2 1 5 3 3 3 4 4 7 6 6 Andean Avocet Recurvirostra andina 45–48cm N Andes. Fairly common s. to Atacama (3700–4600m); rarely wanders to coast. Shallow saline lakes, At first glance, these shorebirds might seem impossible to ID, but it helps when different species as- adjacent bogs. Feeds by wading, sweeping its bill side to side in shallow water. Calls: ringing, slightly sociate together. The unmistakable White-backed Stilt left of center (1) is one reference point, and nasal wiek wiek…, and wehk. Ages/sexes similar, but female bill more strongly recurved. the large brown sandpiper with a decurved bill at far left is a Hudsonian Whimbrel (2), another reference for size. Thus, the 4 stocky, short-billed, standing shorebirds = Black-bellied Plovers (3).
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Plover Questions and Answers February 1999
    Mountain Plover Questions and Answers February 1999 1. What does the recent proposal to list the mountain plover as a threatened species mean? The proposal means that the Fish and Wildlife Service, after thoroughly examining the best scientific information available, believes that the mountain plover is likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range unless actions are taken now to reverse the decline in population. While there is not an immediate threat of extinction, several factors were identified that may have caused the decline, and which are likely to continue in the future. Unless these problems are solved, the mountain plover is likely to disappear at some currently occupied sites, which could increase the likelihood of extinction throughout its range. 2. What is the difference between a threatened and an endangered species listing? By definition, an endangered species is one that is in immediate danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range; a threatened species is one that is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a portion of its range. Protections under the Act are generally the same for threatened and endangered species. However, for threatened species, special rules can be developed which allow for greater flexibility in land use. 3. Why is the mountain plover important? Like canaries in coal mines, the mountain plover and other native species are indicators of the health of native prairies. The decline of the mountain plover and its habitat is an early warning that the replacement of many native grasslands with urban development, as well as some specific grazing and farming practices, are hindering the survival of the short-grass prairie.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeographical Profiles of Shorebird Migration in Midcontinental North America
    U.S. Geological Survey Biological Resources Division Technical Report Series Information and Biological Science Reports ISSN 1081-292X Technology Reports ISSN 1081-2911 Papers published in this series record the significant find­ These reports are intended for the publication of book­ ings resulting from USGS/BRD-sponsored and cospon­ length-monographs; synthesis documents; compilations sored research programs. They may include extensive data of conference and workshop papers; important planning or theoretical analyses. These papers are the in-house coun­ and reference materials such as strategic plans, standard terpart to peer-reviewed journal articles, but with less strin­ operating procedures, protocols, handbooks, and manu­ gent restrictions on length, tables, or raw data, for example. als; and data compilations such as tables and bibliogra­ We encourage authors to publish their fmdings in the most phies. Papers in this series are held to the same peer-review appropriate journal possible. However, the Biological Sci­ and high quality standards as their journal counterparts. ence Reports represent an outlet in which BRD authors may publish papers that are difficult to publish elsewhere due to the formatting and length restrictions of journals. At the same time, papers in this series are held to the same peer-review and high quality standards as their journal counterparts. To purchase this report, contact the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161 (call toll free 1-800-553-684 7), or the Defense Technical Infonnation Center, 8725 Kingman Rd., Suite 0944, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6218. Biogeographical files o Shorebird Migration · Midcontinental Biological Science USGS/BRD/BSR--2000-0003 December 1 By Susan K.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Shorebird Profiles
    List of Shorebird Profiles Pacific Central Atlantic Species Page Flyway Flyway Flyway American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) •513 American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana) •••499 Black-bellied Plover (Pluvialis squatarola) •488 Black-necked Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus) •••501 Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani)•490 Buff-breasted Sandpiper (Tryngites subruficollis) •511 Dowitcher (Limnodromus spp.)•••485 Dunlin (Calidris alpina)•••483 Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemestica)••475 Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus)•••492 Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) ••503 Marbled Godwit (Limosa fedoa)••505 Pacific Golden-Plover (Pluvialis fulva) •497 Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa)••473 Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres)•••479 Sanderling (Calidris alba)•••477 Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus)••494 Spotted Sandpiper (Actitis macularia)•••507 Upland Sandpiper (Bartramia longicauda)•509 Western Sandpiper (Calidris mauri) •••481 Wilson’s Phalarope (Phalaropus tricolor) ••515 All illustrations in these profiles are copyrighted © George C. West, and used with permission. To view his work go to http://www.birchwoodstudio.com. S H O R E B I R D S M 472 I Explore the World with Shorebirds! S A T R ER G S RO CHOOLS P Red Knot (Calidris canutus) Description The Red Knot is a chunky, medium sized shorebird that measures about 10 inches from bill to tail. When in its breeding plumage, the edges of its head and the underside of its neck and belly are orangish. The bird’s upper body is streaked a dark brown. It has a brownish gray tail and yellow green legs and feet. In the winter, the Red Knot carries a plain, grayish plumage that has very few distinctive features. Call Its call is a low, two-note whistle that sometimes includes a churring “knot” sound that is what inspired its name.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Contents
    Traveler’s Guide WILDLIFE WATCHINGTraveler’s IN PERU Guide WILDLIFE WATCHING IN PERU CONTENTS CONTENTS PERU, THE NATURAL DESTINATION BIRDS Northern Region Lambayeque, Piura and Tumbes Amazonas and Cajamarca Cordillera Blanca Mountain Range Central Region Lima and surrounding areas Paracas Huánuco and Junín Southern Region Nazca and Abancay Cusco and Machu Picchu Puerto Maldonado and Madre de Dios Arequipa and the Colca Valley Puno and Lake Titicaca PRIMATES Small primates Tamarin Marmosets Night monkeys Dusky titi monkeys Common squirrel monkeys Medium-sized primates Capuchin monkeys Saki monkeys Large primates Howler monkeys Woolly monkeys Spider monkeys MARINE MAMMALS Main species BUTTERFLIES Areas of interest WILD FLOWERS The forests of Tumbes The dry forest The Andes The Hills The cloud forests The tropical jungle www.peru.org.pe [email protected] 1 Traveler’s Guide WILDLIFE WATCHINGTraveler’s IN PERU Guide WILDLIFE WATCHING IN PERU ORCHIDS Tumbes and Piura Amazonas and San Martín Huánuco and Tingo María Cordillera Blanca Chanchamayo Valley Machu Picchu Manu and Tambopata RECOMMENDATIONS LOCATION AND CLIMATE www.peru.org.pe [email protected] 2 Traveler’s Guide WILDLIFE WATCHINGTraveler’s IN PERU Guide WILDLIFE WATCHING IN PERU Peru, The Natural Destination Peru is, undoubtedly, one of the world’s top desti- For Peru, nature-tourism and eco-tourism repre- nations for nature-lovers. Blessed with the richest sent an opportunity to share its many surprises ocean in the world, largely unexplored Amazon for- and charm with the rest of the world. This guide ests and the highest tropical mountain range on provides descriptions of the main groups of species Pthe planet, the possibilities for the development of the country offers nature-lovers; trip recommen- bio-diversity in its territory are virtually unlim- dations; information on destinations; services and ited.
    [Show full text]