DOCSLIB.ORG

The Impact of Social Computing on the EU Information Society and Economy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Impact of Social Computing on the EU Information Society and Economy The Impact of Social Computing on the EU Information Society and Economy 2009 EUR 24063 EN The mission of the JRC-IPTS is to provide customer-driven support to the EU policy-making process by developing science-based responses to policy challenges that have both a socio-economic as well as a scientific/technological dimension. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Contact information Address: Edificio Expo. c/ Inca Garcilaso, 3. E-41092 Seville (Spain) E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +34 954488318 Fax: +34 954488300 http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu Legal Notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server http://europa.eu/ JRC54327 EUR 24063 EN ISBN 978-92-79-13813-3 ISSN 1018-5593 DOI 10.2791/29872 Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities © European Communities, 2009 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Printed in Spain Acknowledgements This report was produced by the Information Society Unit at the Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) of the Joint Research Centre (JRC). The research was carried out in the context of an Exploratory Project on Social Computing started in 2007, and a subsequent set of research projects co-financed by IPTS, and the European Commission’s Directorates General Education and Culture, Information Society and Media, and Enterprise and Industry during 2007 and 2008. The editors would like to thank the authors and also all the external experts who provided valuable guidance and comments on the various documents of the project. Special thanks go to the External Steering Committee members who guided the project from the start and peer-reviewed the final version of the Report. The editors would also like to thank former IPTS colleagues and all European Commission colleagues for their support and policy guidance throughout the research project. Finally, the editors are grateful to the internal IPTS management and staff for their trust, support, guidance and valuable comments. The authors by chapter Chapter 1: Key Findings, Future Prospects, and Policy Challenges - Clara Centeno, Wainer Lusoli, Gianluca Misuraca, Yves Punie and David Broster Chapter 2: The Adoption and Use of Social Computing - Corina Pascu Chapter 3: Social Computing from a Business Perspective - Sven Lindmark The Impact of Social Computing on the EU Information Society Economy and Information EU the on Computing Social of Impact The Chapter 4: Social Computing and the Mobile Ecosystem - Claudio Feijóo Chapter 5: Social Computing and Identity - Wainer Lusoli and Romina Cachia Chapter 6: Social Computing and Learning - Kirsti Ala-Mutka Chapter 7: Social Computing and Social Inclusion - Stefano Kluzer and Alexandra Haché Chapter 8: Social Computing and Health - José A. Valverde Chapter 9: Social Computing and Governance - Gianluca Misuraca Editors Yves Punie, Wainer Lusoli, Clara Centeno, Gianluca Misuraca and David Broster External Steering Committee and Peer Reviewers Ilkka Tuomi, Oy Meaning Processing Ltd (FI), Jean Paul Simon, JPS Public Policy Consulting and LECG (FR), and Stefano Micelli, Venice International University (IT). 3 External Experts (Validation Workshop of the Exploratory Research Project, Jan 2008) Caroline Bassett, University of Sussex Media Studies (UK) Roland Beelaard, Board Wikimedia Netherlands (NL) Marco Bettiol, Department of Business Economics - Ca’ Foscari University (IT) Lee Bryant, Independent Consultant (UK) Aknowledgements Claudio Dondi, Scienter (IT) Andreas Ebert, EU Microsoft Corp. (BE) Valerie Frissen, TNO (NL) Antonio Fumero, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES) Ajit Jaokar, Independent Consultant (UK) Paul Keller, Kennisland, Amsterdan (NL) Nick Kings, British Telecom (UK) Isidro Maya Jariego, University of Sevilla (ES) Paul Miller, Schoolofeverything (UK) James Munro, Patient Opinion, Sheffield (UK) Jaume Nualart, Independent Consultant (ES) Jo Pierson, Free University Brussels, SMIT-IBBT (BE) Patrice Riemens, Waag society old - new media, Amsterdam (NL) Richard Straub, Advisor to the Chairman, IBM, EMEA and EDMC (FR). Former IPTS colleagues David Osimo (now at Tech4i2, UK) and Martin Ulbrich (now at EC DG EMPL) IPTS Steering Committee of the Exploratory Research Project Marc Bodganowicz, Jean-Claude Burgelman (now at EC DG RTD), Clara Centeno and Ioannis Maghiros. IPTS Editorial support Margherita Bacigalupo and Patricia Farrer. 4 Table of contents Preface 7 Executive Summary 9 Part I: Main messages 15 1. Key Findings, Future Prospects and Policy Implications 15 1.1. What is Social Computing, what is new and major impacts 15 1.2. Cross-cutting findings 20 1.3. Future prospects of Social Computing 23 1.4. Policy challenges and opportunities 26 Part II: On defining Social Computing, its Scope and Significance 33 2. The Adoption and Use of Social Computing 33 2.1. Introduction 33 2.2. The state of Social Computing 33 2.3. Demographic profiles of adopters 36 2.4. What comes next? 36 Society Economy and Information EU the on Computing Social of Impact The 2.5. Policy implications 40 2.6 References 40 3. Social Computing from a Business Perspective 43 3.1. The Social Computing industry and its value chain 43 3.2. Business models for application providers 46 3.3. Industrial impact 48 3.4. Europe’s position in Social Computing 51 3.5. Policy implications 55 3.6 References 56 4. Social Computing and the Mobile Ecosystem 61 4.1. Industry and its market expectations 62 4.2. The user’s behaviour 64 4.3. Challenges and opportunities 66 5 4.4. Trust and perceived value 68 4.5. Policy implications 69 4.6 References 70 5. Social Computing and Identity 73 5.1. Technical trends: social identity management 73 5.2. Social trends: identity construction and disclosure in Social Computing 74 5.3. Economic trends: the economics of identity in Social Computing 75 Table of contents of Table 5.4. Challenges 76 5.5. Policy implications 79 5.6 References 80 Part III: Sectoral Impacts of Social Computing: Opportunities and Challenges 87 6. Social Computing and Learning 87 6.1. Social computing for education and training 87 6.2. Emerging trends and drivers 88 6.3. Challenges 91 6.4. Policy implications 92 6.5 References 93 7. Social Computing and Social Inclusion 97 7.1. Social exclusion and digital exclusion 97 7.2. Social computing, digital inclusion and social inclusion 100 7.3. Emerging trends and drivers 103 7.4. Challenges 105 7.5. Policy implications 106 7.6 References 107 8. Social Computing and Health 111 8.1. European healthcare and health 2.0 111 8.2. Opportunities for Social Computing and health 113 8.3. Challenges for Social Computing and health 116 8.4. Policy implications 117 8.5 References 118 9. Social Computing and Governance 121 9.1. Introduction 121 9.2. Emerging trends and drivers 121 9.3. Assessing impacts of Social Computing for governance 122 9.4. Opportunities and challenges 130 9.5. Policy implications 131 6 9.6 References 133 Preface At the European Council held in Lisbon in March 2000, EU15 Heads of Government set a goal for Europe to become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion. This goal was renewed in 2005 to emphasise growth and jobs and with plans to facilitate innovation through the take-up of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and higher investment in human capital. In this context, this report, and the research that lies behind it, focuses on “Social Computing” that enables user-centric, collaborative knowledge sharing, community-building activities using the Internet. Globally, the Internet is used by some 1.7 billion people1 (24.7% of the population) and by some 318 million Europeans (64%).2 Social computing has exhibited a prolific growth since its genesis in the early years of this decade and, since 2005, has achieved unprecedented levels of EU and global usage. Current estimates indicate more than 130 million Europeans3 are involved in social computing and are interacting in a broad spectrum of commercial, leisure and social domains. It is very likely that all readers will have had some social computing experience in either an active or passive role as encounters with Social Computing have become mainstream for the vast majority of Internet users. Searches for information will frequently transport us to Wikipedia, YouTube, Facebook or similar, or else to Blogs and other forms of collaborative on-line applications that have adopted the so-called Web 2.0 paradigm. For the younger generations, social computing has provided a medium for expression of interests and opinions, for collaboration and for building communities unbounded by locality. Beyond the initial wave of “getting involved”, social computing is now in a period of consolidation The Impact of Social Computing on the EU Information Society Economy and Information EU the on Computing Social of Impact The and maturation enabling individuals, and groups, to access and contribute to knowledge on an ever increasing and already vast array of topics. Examining the evidence in this report and elsewhere, it is relatively easy to see how, over the coming years, social computing could play an increasingly important role in re-engaging citizens in political debate, in securing social cohesion and harmony, and it could provide a platform for dialogue on the grand challenges of the EU and the rest of the world.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Top 50 Twitter Terms
    NetLingo Top 50 Twitter Terms 1. @reply - A way to say something directly back to another person on Twitter @username, so it’s public for all to see 2. #word - When you put a hashtag before a word, it adds and sorts tweets into a category to display what's trending 3. bieber baiting - Using Justin Bieber’s name in posts to drive traffic to your online accounts (it’s actually illegal) 4. blogosphere - The shared space of blogs, crogs, flogs, microblogs, moblogs, placeblogs, plogs, splogs, vlogs 5. digital dirt - Unflattering information you may have written on social networking sites that can later haunt you 6. DM - Direct Message, a message between only you and the person you are sending it to, it is considered private 7. flash mob - A large group of people who gather suddenly in a public place, do something, then quickly disperse 8. FOMO - Fear Of Missing Out, online junkies paying partial attention to everything while scrolling through feeds 9. hashtag - When the hash sign (#) is added to a word or phrase, it lets users search for tweets similarly tagged 10. hashtag activism - Using Twitter's hashtags for Internet activism, for example #metoo #occupywallstreet 11. HT - Hat Tip, it’s an abbreviation you use to attribute a link to one of your tweeps 12. indigenous content - User-generated content created by the digital natives for themselves 13. influencer - Active Twitter users who have influence on others due to their large number of followers 14. Larry the Bird - The name of the Twitter bird, in honor of the Celtics basketball legend Larry Bird 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media in Government
    Social Media in Government Alex Howard Government 2.0 Correspondent O’Reilly Media Agenda • A brief history of social media • e-government, open government & “We government” • The growth and future of “Gov 2.0” What is social media? Try today’s Wikipedia entry: social media is media for social interaction, using highly accessible and scalable publishing techniques A read-write Web Think of it another way: Social media are messages, text, video or audio published on digital platforms that the community to create the content Social media isn’t new • Consider the Internet before the Web (1969- 1991) • Used by military, academia and hackers • Unix-to-Unix Copy (UUCP), Telnet, e-mail Bulletin Board Services (BBS) (1979) Ward Christensen and the First BBS Usenet (1979) • First conceived of by Tom Truscott and Jim Ellis. • Usenet let users post articles or posts to newsgroups. Commercial online services (1979) Online chat rooms (1980) Internet Relay Chat (1988) • IRC was followed by ICQ in the mid- 90s. • First IM program for PCs. World Wide Web (1991) Blogs (1994) • Blogging rapidly grew in use in 1999, when Blogger and LiveJournal launched. Wikis (1994) • Ward Cunningham started development on the first wiki in 1994 and installed it on c2.om in 1995. • Cunningham was in part inspired by Apple’s Hypercard • Cunningham developed Vannevar Bush’s ideas of “allowing users to comment on and change one another’s text” America Online (1995) Social networks (1997) From one to hundreds of millions • Six Degrees was the first modern social network. • Friendster followed in 2002. • MySpace founded in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Instafame: Luxury Selfies in the Attention Economy
    Public Culture Instafame: Luxury Selfies in the Attention Economy Alice E. Marwick Empire on top, my Instagram — my watch Five days on my yacht Cash money act up I just Instagram my shit and let them broke haters just watch —Fat Joe, “Instagram That Hoe” Instagram, the mobile photo- sharing application, was pur- chased for $1 billion by Facebook in 2012; it had, at the time, thirteen employees. While a $1 billion valuation is difficult to grasp — that’s more than the New York Times is worth — the purchase is now widely viewed by tech and business analysts as a coup (Indvik 2013). Facebook’s popularity with young, lucrative American consumers has waned as it has grown into an aggregated behemoth of online content, its News Feeds clogged with video game scores, e- commerce purchases, and advertising (Hess 2013). Instagram, despite having far fewer users, is thriv- ing. The site’s top users are a who’s who of pop stars and television celebrities. It is used by 11 percent of American teenagers, was parodied by the popular site CollegeHumor, and is regularly name- checked in hip- hop songs (Madden et al. 2013). With Instagram’s user base of 150 million people comes the possibility of achieving Instafame, the condition of having a relatively great number of follow- ers on the app. While the most followed users are primarily celebrities — the pop star Rihanna, for instance, has 11 million followers — to many Instagram users, gathering thousands, or even hundreds, of followers can be a motivating force. One participant in a Pew Research Center Internet study on online bullying said: Public Culture 27:1 doi 10.1215/08992363-2798379 Copyright 2015 by Duke University Press 137 Published by Duke University Press Public Culture Public Culture “[On Instagram,] people tend to not come off so mean.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mobile Learning Journey: Or "A Tale of Two Academics' Pedagogical
    A mobile learning journey: Or "A tale of two academics' pedagogical partnership" COCHRANE, Thom and BATEMAN, Roger <http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3086- 6273> Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/4400/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version COCHRANE, Thom and BATEMAN, Roger (2010). A mobile learning journey: Or "A tale of two academics' pedagogical partnership". In: Sixth International Conference on Technology, Knowledge and Society, Free University, Berlin, Germany, 15-17 January 2010. (Unpublished) Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk A Mobile Learning Journey: Or “A tale of two academics’ pedagogical partnership”. Thomas Cochrane Unitec, New Zealand [email protected] Roger Bateman Unitec, New Zealand [email protected] Abstract Today, less than a billion people have access to computers, whereas around four billion people have access to mobile phones. At the same time, the nature of the Internet has been undergoing a revolution labelled ‘web 2.0’. Most web 2.0 tools are also designed to be mobile friendly, allowing reading and updating of web 2.0 content from mobile phones, and also featuring enhanced mobile affordances such as photo and video blogging (from cameraphones), and geotagging (from GPS equipped smartphones). Hence mobile web 2.0 provides a platform for wider access than traditional computing that is context independent, facilitating ‘authentic’ learning environments (A. Herrington & Herrington, 2007, 2006; Jan Herrington, Herrington, Mantei, Olney, & Ferry, 2009) beyond the boundaries of the traditional tertiary classroom.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING Generating Word-Of-Mouth Using Technology
    THE GRUMPY OLD MANAGERS GUIDE TO… SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING Generating Word-of-Mouth Using Technology By Rick and Nikki Carter e-nova communications We don’t talk about organisations. We talk about the benefits they bring to people. Social media is content created by people using highly accessible and scalable publishing technologies. At its most basic sense, social media is a shift in how people discover, read and share news, information and content. It's a set of technologies, tools and platforms facilitating the discovery, participation and sharing of content. It is transforming monologues (one to many) into dialogues (many to many) and the democratisation of information, transforming people from content readers into publishers. Social media has become extremely popular because it allows people to connect in the online world to form relationships for personal and business. Businesses also refer to social media as user-generated content (UGC) or consumer-generated media (CGM). Source: www.wikipedia.com ©2009 E-nova Pty Ltd Feel free to post this e-book on your blog, share it on Facebook or LinkedIn, Twitter about it or email to another Grumpy Old Manager. Index ______________ The Grumpy Old Manager/Father and his Colleague/Daughter About us Our 10 year journey to Social Media Tatiana Grigorieva’s story The Grumpy Old Managers Guide to Social Media Marketing Introduction What is a Grumpy Old Manager? Embrace the evolution Social Media For a while we just didn’t get it either Social Networks The value of being LinkedIn LinkedIn So now we
    [Show full text]
  • Twitter As a Marketing Tool for Libraries
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University University Library Faculty Publications Georgia State University Library 2013 Twitter as a Marketing Tool for Libraries Laura Carscaddon Georgia State University, [email protected] Kimberly Chapman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/univ_lib_facpub Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Carscaddon, L. & Chapman, K. (2013). Twitter as a marketing tool for libraries. In Thomsett-Scott, B.C. (Ed.), Marketing with Social Media: A LITA Guide. Chicago: American Library Association. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Georgia State University Library at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Library Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Chapter 10: Twitter as a Marketing Tool for Libraries Laura Carscaddon and Kimberly Chapman Why Twitter? Twitter is a microblogging service that allows users to post messages (tweets) of up to 140 characters and broadcast those messages immediately on the Web. According to the Pew Research Center, 15% of online adults use Twitter, with 8% making use of it on a typical day. The same report showed higher Twitter use among certain demographic groups, particularly African Americans, at 28% and young adults, with 31% of the 18-24 age group using Twitter (Smith & Brenner, 2012). Twitter is one of the easiest ways to start testing the social media waters. No specialized tools are required to use Twitter, and with more than 140 million active users of Twitter, there’s a good chance that at least some people in your community are using Twitter ("What is Twitter?," 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Single-Column Edition
    Cites & Insights Crawford at Large/Online Edition Libraries • Policy • Technology • Media Volume 12, Number 2: March 2012 ISSN 1534-0937 The Front Reinvention—of a Sort The Cites & Insights hiatus announced November 28, 2011, technically ended January 20, 2012, when Cites & Insights 12:1 (January-February 2012) appeared. By then, I was through with my landmark investigation into public library presence on social networks and almost through preparing the initial results (the book based on that survey, Successful Social Networking in Public Libraries, is already listed in ALA Editions’ catalog and available for preorder, although it’s just entered the editing stages and won’t be available for several months). My other 2012 book, The Librarian’s Guide to Micropublishing, was not only finished, it was actually for sale (in paperback, ebook form and, from Lulu, in a first-rate hardcover edition). While I take a break before working on future book ideas, I find that I want to continue C&I—at least for a while. Inside This Issue Social Networks ...................................................................................... 10 The Middle.............................................................................................. 28 The Back ................................................................................................. 45 I’m still lacking sponsorship, and that’s an issue: It’s tempting to turn all creative energies toward things that do return some revenue, given our household’s general lack of earned income. I’m still wondering whether C&I’s effectiveness and influence have both faded away. I’ve had recent indications from a couple of unexpected sources that some library guy named Walt Crawford has had valuable things to day—but I wonder whether that guy was expected to disappear quietly into retirement some time ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Me 2.0 Arrives in Book Stores Nationally On
    ll ia ri te Ma s u n o B Dan Schawbel Me 2.0 arrives in Personal Branding Expert book stores Author of Me 2.0 nationally on: http://personalbrandingblog.com April 7th, 2009 Pre-order it today! Introduction Definition à A blog is an online diary in chronological order. Fast facts à There are 133 million blogs as of 2002 (Technorati) à 80% of blogs fail within 6 months à Everyone blogs: CEO’s such as Jonathan Schwartz & Bill Marriott Celebrities such as John Mayer and Curt Schilling à >50% of journalists turn to blogs for article ideas (Brodeur) à 50% of consumers use blogs as buying guides (NY Times) 10 Blog Benefits 1. Position yourself as an expert 2. Rank high in Google 3. Build a community 4. Gain confidence in yourself 5. Sharpen your writing and technical skills 6. Get your message across for free 7. Network with successful people 8. Command attention from mainstream media 9. Make money 10. Stay current and have a voice in your industry How To Use This eBook Purpose à To help you build a powerful brand with a blog Framework 1. Beginner Learn the basics to jumpstart your blog RSS, widgets, Technorati, posting, logo & theme 2. Intermediate Formatting, pictures, links & pages Forum, email and comment marketing 3. Advanced Blog hosting, custom themes & plugins Social network integration & SEO 4. Expert Podcasting, lifestreaming and mailing lists Make money blogging and more! Your Path To Success Beginner Step 1. Learn about blogging Before starting a blog, learn about what blogging actually is! If you want to know the difference between traditional and social media, here is an example: à New York Times (traditional article) http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/technology/13iPhone.html?ref=technolog y à New York Times (blog post) http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/best-buys-break-even-iphone- deal/?ref=technology à Differences Notice the difference in formatting and how the blog has comments open but the regular article doesn’t.
    [Show full text]
  • October 9, 2014
    NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD October 9, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Lee Rainie, Director of Internet, Science & Technology Research, Pew Research Center Janna Anderson, Director, Elon University’s Imagining the Internet Center Jennifer Connolly, Research Consultant 202.419.4500 www.pewresearch.org RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, September 2014, “Killer Apps in the Gigabit Age” Available at: http://www.pewInternet.org/2014/10/09/killer-apps-in-the-gigabit-age/ 2 PEW RESEARCH CENTER About This Report This report is the latest in a sustained effort throughout 2014 by the Pew Research Center to mark the 25th anniversary of the creation of the World Wide Web by Sir Tim Berners-Lee (The Web at 25). The report covers experts’ views about what much faster bandwidth speeds might produce as new Internet activities. Over the past few decades people have been sharing and accessing magnitudes more information online annually. Network speeds are dependent upon many factors, but local Internet architecture is a lynchpin for the kind of efficient service that can handle cutting edge activities that could involve high-definition video encounters or massive amounts of data flowing between devices tied to the Internet of Things. In fact, former Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski issued a “Gigabit City Challenge” in 2013, urging that all 50 US states have at least one community with gigabit Internet access by 2015 so “innovators can develop next-generation applications and services that
    [Show full text]
  • Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/IE(2006)7/FINAL
    Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/IE(2006)7/FINAL Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 12-Apr-2007 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY COMMITTEE FOR INFORMATION, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS POLICY Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/IE(2006)7/FINAL Working Party on the Information Economy PARTICIPATIVE WEB: USER-CREATED CONTENT English - Or. English JT03225396 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format DSTI/ICCP/IE(2006)7/FINAL FOREWORD This report was presented to the Working Party on the Information Economy (WPIE) in December 2006 and declassified by the Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy in March 2007. The report was prepared by Sacha Wunsch-Vincent and Graham Vickery of the OECD's Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry as part of the WPIE work on Digital Content (www.oecd.org/sti/digitalcontent). It is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. © OECD/OCDE 2007 2 DSTI/ICCP/IE(2006)7/FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................................. 4 PARTICIPATIVE WEB: USER-CREATED CONTENT (UCC) ............................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Google Overview Created by Phil Wane
    Google Overview Created by Phil Wane PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:03:55 UTC Contents Articles Google 1 Criticism of Google 20 AdWords 33 AdSense 39 List of Google products 44 Blogger (service) 60 Google Earth 64 YouTube 85 Web search engine 99 User:Moonglum/ITEC30011 105 References Article Sources and Contributors 106 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 112 Article Licenses License 114 Google 1 Google [1] [2] Type Public (NASDAQ: GOOG , FWB: GGQ1 ) Industry Internet, Computer software [3] [4] Founded Menlo Park, California (September 4, 1998) Founder(s) Sergey M. Brin Lawrence E. Page Headquarters 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California, United States Area served Worldwide Key people Eric E. Schmidt (Chairman & CEO) Sergey M. Brin (Technology President) Lawrence E. Page (Products President) Products See list of Google products. [5] [6] Revenue US$23.651 billion (2009) [5] [6] Operating income US$8.312 billion (2009) [5] [6] Profit US$6.520 billion (2009) [5] [6] Total assets US$40.497 billion (2009) [6] Total equity US$36.004 billion (2009) [7] Employees 23,331 (2010) Subsidiaries YouTube, DoubleClick, On2 Technologies, GrandCentral, Picnik, Aardvark, AdMob [8] Website Google.com Google Inc. is a multinational public corporation invested in Internet search, cloud computing, and advertising technologies. Google hosts and develops a number of Internet-based services and products,[9] and generates profit primarily from advertising through its AdWords program.[5] [10] The company was founded by Larry Page and Sergey Brin, often dubbed the "Google Guys",[11] [12] [13] while the two were attending Stanford University as Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Looc: a Cyber-Physical Social Network on Android Platforms
    LOOC: A CYBER-PHYSICAL SOCIAL NETWORK ON ANDROID PLATFORMS By CARMEN PATRICIA AYERDIS ESPINOZA Bachelor of Computer Systems Universidad Católica Managua, Nicaragua 2000 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December, 2010 LOOC: A CYBER-PHYSICAL SOCIAL NETWORK ON ANDROID PLATFORMS Thesis Approved: Dr. Xiaolin Li Thesis Adviser Dr. Subhash Kak Dr. Blayne Mayfield Dr. Mark E. Payton Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would love to express my gratitude to all the people who support me during this amazing two years. I am very grateful with Fulbright Fellowship for this life experience. Also, my thanks go to Dr. Li for the opportunity to work with him and be part of his amazing team of students. It was such an exciting experience to be part of the computer science family at Oklahoma State University. I have never met such a faculty so excited to teach their students how to be better and more dedicated. Special thanks to the wonderful family God gave me. My gratitude goes to my baby brother Jose Luis for being such a wonderful source of inspiration. Thanks to God for giving me the best American sister I could possible ask, Stacey Bridges who welcomed in her house and her life. Thanks to Noah Paul Evans for making me smile during this year. While studying in OSU I met amazing people and friends….Thanks to everybody who supports me. Finally, to my dad Dr. Guillermo Ayerdis thanks, you were right…… this country is an amazing one and I still miss you.
    [Show full text]