DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Guidelines and Design Standards for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Guidelines and Design Standards for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems Planning Guidelines and Design Standards for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems Version 1.0 October 10, 2007 TSA506 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] TSA506 Planning Guidelines and Design Standards for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems Version 1.0 October 10, 2007 TSA506 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] TSA506 NOTICE This document is distributed under the sponsorship of the Transportation Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use. This document does not create regulatory requirements. There are recommendations and guidelines contained in this document that might be considered highly beneficial in one airport environment while being virtually impossible to implement at another airport. The purpose of the document is to provide as extensive a list of options, ideas, and suggestions as possible for the airport architect, designer, planner and engineer to choose from when first considering security requirements in the early planning and design of new or renovated airport facilities. This document has been formatted for double sided printing. VERSION HISTORY Version Date Modifications 0.1 December 29, 2006 Original submittal by BSIS Technical Team 0.2 June 21, 2007 Update based on TSA technical review 0.3 July 12, 2007 Update based on TSA program office review 1.0 October 10, 2007 Update based on SSI and final TSA review Planning Guidelines and Design Standards for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems Version 1.0, October 10, 2007 TSA506 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Planning Guidelines and Design Standards for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems Version 1.0, October 10, 2007 TSA506 i CONTENTS Chapter Page 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background........................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Previous Versions of Planning and Design Guidelines .............. 1-3 1.3 Purpose............................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Scope ................................................................................................... 1-4 1.5 Organization ...................................................................................... 1-4 1.6 Referenced Documents and Models............................................... 1-5 1.6.1 Recommended Security Guidelines for Airport Planning, Design and Construction, Revised July 2006 .. 1-5 1.6.2 Integrated Deployment Model............................................ 1-6 1.7 Next Steps .......................................................................................... 1-6 1.7.1 Design Issues ......................................................................... 1-6 1.7.2 Implementation Issues ......................................................... 1-6 1.7.3 Post-Implementation Issues................................................. 1-7 1.7.4 Funding Issues....................................................................... 1-7 2 GUIDELINES CONTEXT AND PRIMARY OBJECTIVES................... 2-1 2.1 Need for BSIS Guidelines................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Emphasis and Objectives of Guidelines ........................................ 2-2 2.2.1 Lowest-Cost Solutions.......................................................... 2-2 2.2.2 Operational Performance Standards.................................. 2-3 2.2.3 Avoiding Common Pitfalls.................................................. 2-3 2.2.4 Appropriate Initial System Sizing ...................................... 2-3 2.2.5 Equipment Redundancy and Contingency Operations .. 2-3 2.2.6 Accommodating Growth ..................................................... 2-4 2.2.7 Flexibility................................................................................ 2-4 2.2.8 Stakeholder Involvement..................................................... 2-4 2.2.9 Design Review and Approval Process............................... 2-5 3 PLANNING AND DESIGN PROCESS................................................... 3-1 3.1 Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Project Stakeholders.............................................................. 3-1 3.1.2 Project Sponsor ...................................................................... 3-2 3.1.3 Integrated Local Design Team ............................................ 3-2 3.1.4 TSA Headquarters................................................................. 3-2 3.1.5 Government-Industry Working Group ............................. 3-3 3.1.6 Summary ................................................................................ 3-3 Planning Guidelines and Design Standards for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems Version 1.0, October 10, 2007 TSA506 ii CONTENTS (continued) Chapter Page 3 PLANNING AND DESIGN PROCESS (continued) 3.2 Project Phases .................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.1 Pre-Design.............................................................................. 3-4 3.2.2 Schematic Design .................................................................. 3-5 3.2.3 Detailed Design ..................................................................... 3-7 3.2.3.1 30% Design Sub-Phase......................................... 3-7 3.2.3.2 70% Design Sub-Phase......................................... 3-8 3.2.3.3 100% Design Sub-Phase....................................... 3-9 3.2.4 Construction Phase ............................................................... 3-9 3.2.5 Testing and Commissioning................................................ 3-10 3.2.6 Project Closeout Phase ......................................................... 3-11 3.3 Summary ............................................................................................ 3-11 4 DESIGN STANDARDS............................................................................. 4-1 4.1 General Design Requirements ........................................................ 4-1 4.1.1 Security ................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Efficiency ................................................................................ 4-1 4.1.3 Passenger Level-Of-Service ................................................. 4-1 4.1.4 Cost-Effectiveness ................................................................. 4-2 4.1.5 Concept of Operation ........................................................... 4-2 4.1.6 Proper System Selection and Sizing ................................... 4-2 4.2 Specific Design Requirements......................................................... 4-2 4.2.1 BHS Capacity ......................................................................... 4-3 4.2.2 Screening Throughput Capacity......................................... 4-3 4.2.3 Bag Time in System............................................................... 4-3 4.2.4 OSR Decision Time ............................................................... 4-3 4.2.5 BHS Tracking ID.................................................................... 4-3 4.2.5.1 Positive Bag Tracking .......................................... 4-3 4.2.5.2 Error Bags at Checked Baggage Resolution Area (CBRA).......................................................... 4-4 4.2.6 Bag Tag Identification........................................................... 4-4 4.2.7 Conveyor Control.................................................................. 4-4 4.2.7.1 Dynamic Braking.................................................. 4-5 4.2.7.2 Variable Frequency Drives.................................. 4-5 4.2.7.3 Gradual Conveyor Speed Transitions ............... 4-5 4.2.8 Avoidance of Steep Conveyor Slopes ................................ 4-5 4.2.9 Divert and Merge .................................................................. 4-5 4.2.10 Conveyable Items.................................................................. 4-5 4.2.10.1 Proper Handling of Oversize Bags .................... 4-6 4.2.10.2 Proper Handling of Out-of-Gauge Bags ........... 4-6 Planning Guidelines and Design Standards for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems Version 1.0, October 10, 2007 TSA506 iii CONTENTS (continued) Chapter Page 4 DESIGN STANDARDS (continued) 4.2.11 Fail Safe Operation................................................................ 4-6 4.2.12 Image Quality (IQ) Test Requirements.............................. 4-6 4.2.13 Bag Orientation/Positioning............................................... 4-6 4.2.14 Bag Jam Rate .......................................................................... 4-6 4.2.15 BHS Displays at CBRA......................................................... 4-6 4.2.16 Alarmed Bag Images at CBRA ............................................ 4-7 4.2.17 Placement of Reinsertion Points ......................................... 4-7 4.2.18 Purge Line .............................................................................. 4-7 4.2.19 Recirculation Loops .............................................................. 4-7 4.2.20 Power Turns after EDS......................................................... 4-7 4.2.21 Non-Powered Rollers ........................................................... 4-7 4.2.22 Draft Curtains .......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elimination Or Reduction of Baggage Recheck for Arriving International Passengers TRB
    96+ pages; Perfect Bind with SPINE COPY or 65–95 pages; Perfect Bind (NO SPINE COPY) REQUESTED ADDRESS SERVICE Washington, DC 20001 500 Fifth Street, NW BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH ACRP Report 61 AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH Elimination or Reduction of Baggage Recheck for Arriving International Passengers ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 61 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Elimination or Reduction of Baggage Recheck for Arriving International Passengers Washington, DC Permit No. 8970 ISBN 978-0-309-21395-0 Non-profit Org. U.S. Postage 9 0 0 0 0 PAID TRB 9 780309 213950 ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2012 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* Abbreviations and acronyms used without definitions in TRB publications: CHAIR OFFICERS AAAE American Association of Airport Executives James Wilding CHAIR: Sandra Rosenbloom, Professor of Planning, University of Arizona, Tucson AASHO American Association of State Highway Officials Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority VICE CHAIR: Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (retired) Corporation, Norfolk, VA ACI–NA Airports Council International–North America EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board ACRP Airport Cooperative Research Program VICE CHAIR ADA Americans with Disabilities Act Jeff Hamiel MEMBERS APTA American Public Transportation Association Minneapolis–St. Paul J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers Metropolitan Airports Commission ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers William A.V. Clark, Professor of Geography and Professor of Statistics, Department of Geography, ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials MEMBERS University of California, Los Angeles ATA Air Transport Association James Crites Eugene A.
    [Show full text]
  • MCO International Arrivals Brochure
    MCO International Arrival Wayfinding Map N SIDE Gates 1-29 Level 1 Gates 100-129 Ground Transportation & Baggage Claim (8A) Level 2 Baggage Claim Gates 10-19 Gates Ticketing Locations 20-29 Gates 100-111 A-1 A-2 Level 3 A-3 A-4 2 1 Gates Gates 1-9 112-129 Hyatt Regency - Lvl.4 Regency Hyatt Security Checkpoint To Gates 70-129 Gates To Food Court To Gates 1-59 Gates To Security Checkpoint Gates 70-79 Gates 50-59 To Parking “C” Gates 3 90-99 4 B-1 B-2 Level 3 B-3 B-4 Gates Gates 30-39 Ticketing Locations Gates 80-89 40-49 Gates 70-99 Level 2 Gates 30-59 Baggage Claim Level 1 Ground Transportation & Baggage Claim (28B) SIDE C Check-in and baggage claim locations subject to change. Please check signage on arrival. *Map not to scale Find it ALL in One Place Download the Orlando MCO App Welcome to Orlando Available for International Airport (MCO) OrlandoAirports.net /flymco @MCO @flymco International Flight Arrival Guide 05/19 After clearing customs and Upon arrival on Level 3 of Welcome to Take the escalator or stairs immigration, claim your baggage the main terminal, look for Orlando International up one level and board the from the baggage carousel then 3 5 the large illuminated letters proceed to the exit. Automated People Mover 7 indicating the A and B sides Airport (MCO) (APM) to the of the terminal. main terminal. Upon exiting the aircraft you will 1 be required to clear U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Reno – Stead Airport
    Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority FY 2017-18 ANNUAL BUDGET Table of Contents SECTION 1 – Introduction and Summary Airport System Overview. ......................................................................................... 1-2 National and Regional Economic Outlook. ............................................................. 2-13 Air Service Market Update. ................................................................................... 13-17 Air Cargo Update. .................................................................................................. 17-19 Operating Environment. ........................................................................................ 19-29 Budget Process. ..................................................................................................... 29-30 Revenue Bond Resolution .......................................................................................... 30 Planning for the Future .......................................................................................... 30-32 Budget Document Structure ....................................................................................... 32 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 32-33 Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... 33 Distinguished Budget Presentation Award ................................................................. 34 SECTION 2 – Executive Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G Baggage Handling System Study
    Appendix G Baggage Handling System Study BAGGAGE HANDLING SYSTEM STUDY G TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBITS TABLES G.1 Inventory.................................................................................... 1 Exhibit G.1-1 | Baggage Screening Process ............................................. 2 Table G.1-1 | Overview of Terminals and Boarding Areas ..................... 2 Exhibit G.1-2 | CTX Explosives Detection System ................................... 3 Table G.1-2 | Terminal 1 Baggage Handling Systems Inventory .......... 5 G.2 Facility Requirements and Design Basis ............................. 14 Exhibit G.1-3 | SFO Overall Existing Baggage Handling System Table G.1-3 | Terminal 2 Baggage Handling Systems Inventory .......... 7 Locations ............................................................................. 4 G.3 Alternative Analysis ............................................................... 27 Table G.1-4 | Terminal 3 Baggage Handling Systems Inventory .......... 9 Exhibit G.1-4 | Terminal 1 Baggage Handling System ........................... 5 G.3.1 Project Drivers .............................................................................. 27 Table G.1-5 | International Terminal Building Boarding Areas Exhibit G.1-5 | Terminal 2 Baggage Handling System ........................... 7 A and G – Existing Baggage Handling System G.3.2 Common Themes Among Alternatives .................................... 30 Operational Capacities ...................................................... 14 Exhibit G.1-6 | Terminal 3 Baggage
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Passengers and Lighters FAQ's, November 2013
    Airline Passengers and Lighters Frequently Asked Questions The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) enforces the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Hazardous Materials Regulations in aviation. This includes safety rules on how airline passengers can carry lighters. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) enforces security rules about what passengers can carry on the aircraft. The FAA guidance below considers both DOT and TSA rules for passengers carrying lighters. Q1. What type of lighter can I bring onto the aircraft? A1. Under DOT rules (49 CFR 175.10), when traveling on a commercial airline, you can bring one (1) lighter that uses a flammable gas (butane) or that uses a flammable liquid that is absorbed in a lining (Zippo-type). The following restrictions apply: • For safety reasons, permitted lighters must be in your carry-on or on your person (in your pocket), not in checked baggage. See Q2. regarding special travel containers that allow lighters in checked baggage. • Under TSA regulations, torch lighters (a.k.a. jet lighters, blue flame lighters, cigar lighters) are forbidden in your carry-on or on your person. TSA rules also prohibit lighters that look like guns or other weapons. • Containers of lighter fluid or gas (butane) are forbidden in carry-on and checked baggage. • Micro torches, chef torches, utility torches, etc., are not considered lighters and are forbidden in carry-on and checked baggage. Fuel for such torches is also forbidden in carry-on and checked baggage. Q2. Is there any exception to the “one lighter only” rule or the “no torch lighters” rule? A2. You can bring up to two (2) additional lighters—including torch lighters—in your checked baggage when you use DOT-approved airtight travel containers for lighters.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear American Airlines Customer, Please Accept Our Sincere Apology
    Form OP124 Rev 04/13/2021 Dear American Airlines Customer, Please accept our sincere apology for the mishandling of your property. We understand your concern and realize the inconvenience this causes. Now that you have made your initial report, completing this form will allow us to intensify our tracing efforts with the goal of locating and returning your property. Complete all areas of this form and return it to us no later than 30 days from date of travel for Loss; and 30 days for Damage/Missing Contents from the date of travel and/or the date the bag was received. Failure to return this completed form to us within the time frame may result in the denial of your claim. Check list: Airline ticket receipts Baggage claim checks Original receipts are required for reimbursement of all delay expenses Receipt(s) for excess value claimed Receipt(s) for excess baggage charges paid Receipt(s) for all items valued over $100.00 Receipt(s) for all items are required for Missing Content claims Clear and legible government issued photo identification for each passenger making a claim Damage claims: retain all damaged bags and/or contents until your claim has been resolved Retain a copy of all documents submitted to the airline for your personal records Please return completed form to us by submitting it online at aa.com/contactbags. If unable to submit the form electronically, mail it to the address below: American Airlines, Inc. Central Baggage 4000 E Sky Harbor Blvd. Phoenix, AZ 85034 Liability Limitations: Liability for loss, delay, or
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Service Quality Benchmarking the Global Airport Industry
    Best Practice Report Baggage Carts Conference Program AIRPORT SERVICE QUALITY BENCHMARKING THE GLOBAL AIRPORT INDUSTRY Best Practice Report Baggage Carts AIRPORTS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL Introduction Airport Service Quality (ASQ) is a comprehensive ACI Contents initiative to help airports in their continuing efforts to improve the quality of service experienced by Landside baggage carts 2 passengers. Pricing 3 The Best Practice Report is a new service offered by the ASQ Survey and is part of the programme’s commitment Baggage cart features 4 to identifying and disseminating best practices from top- performing airports around the world. Baggage cart management 5 The report focuses on a specific topic, aiming to provide Airside baggage carts 6 a comprehensive picture of practices at participating airports as well as to serve as the basis for further discussions between ASQ participants. The report is based on information collected from Survey Participants airports participating in the ASQ Survey using an on- line questionnaire. The present document is a short Africa / Middle East - Asia presentation of the main results of the research and has Bangkok, Christchurch, Doha, Hong Kong, Kuala Lumpur, been rendered anonymous. ASQ participants received the Muscat, Nagoya, Nairobi, New Delhi, Seoul ICN, Sydney, full report along with individual profiles for all airports Tel Aviv which participated in the online survey. Americas The topic of the first Best Practice Report is Baggage Atlanta, Austin, Calgary, Cancun, Cleveland, Detroit, Carts. The following
    [Show full text]
  • Delta Airlines Baggage Policy Domestic Flights
    Delta Airlines Baggage Policy Domestic Flights Aube usually reactivates undeniably or swindles generically when guest Rudd rataplans far and geometricallyblindfold. Brahmanic as homodont Hiralal Hagenulcerating larrup demonstrably. beneficially andMerwin stabilise is stony-broke dexterously. and repackage Note include this calculator only applies to domestic flights. 50 aircraft and flies to around 120 international and domestic destinations. As long as the infant cannot be on a lap then another pope for domestic flights. Every year US airlines collect billions of dollars in baggage fees. What peddle my carry carry is an arrogant too big? How thick is Delta with pearl on size? Allow you should not have airlines? Baggage FAQs Delta. Are there fees for baggage on Delta Airlines SeatGuru. No matter you you're traveling there's at good chance when can eat a Delta flight create a reasonable price When flying with Delta or any airline if it's. The Delta Airlines baggage policy includes the Carry-on baggage. Both hard to international flights may find your luggage policy, vary depending on most flights originating from south america, loan provision push of delta airlines baggage policy. You'll find Delta Airlines's pet cover for travel in the currency and baggage area here. Delta Notes All information is for US to Europe flights Basic Economy class. Delta eliminates extra fees for sports equipment such as bikes. Purse carry-on restrictions Keep the 3-1-1 rule in post when packing your purse for the trip Make sure hand sanitizer liquid makeup toothpaste and deer other non-solid items you carry just your basket are in 34-ounce or smaller containers and age a clear plastic zip-top bag.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Items Allowed and Prohibitted in Carry on Baggage and Checked Baggage
    LIST OF ITEMS ALLOWED AND PROHIBITTED IN CARRY ON BAGGAGE AND CHECKED BAGGAGE SHARP OBJECTS Carry On Checked Baggage Baggage Callus Remover NO YES Nail Clipper NO YES Metal Nail Filer NO YES Metal Nail Filer NO YES Knitting Point NO YES Eyelash Curler NO YES Scalpels, Scalpel Blades and/or Crafting Knifes NO YES Knifes of any kind (including plastic utensils) NO YES Box Openers NO YES Cigar Cutter NO YES Shavers of any size NO YES Axe NO YES Tweezers NO YES Umbrellas of any size NO YES Scissors of any kind or size (this includes plastic and round NO YES tip) Swords and/or Machete NO YES Corkscrew NO YES Ice Axes NO YES NOTE: Any sharp objects in your checked in baggage must be placed in a bag and/or wrapped firmly, to prevent injury to baggage dispatchers and security inspectors. 1 LIQUIDS, AEROSOLS AND GELS Carry On Checked Baggage Baggage (L.A.G) Oils NO YES Water NO YES Alcohol NO YES Stews NO YES Soup NO YES Syrups NO YES Jams NO YES Pasta NO YES Salsa NO YES Toothpaste of any kind NO YES Perfume and cologne of any kind NO YES Shaving cream or shaving gel NO YES Gel or liquid deodorant NO YES Liquid lipstick and/or Lip Balm NO YES Hair gel NO YES Shampoo and Conditioner (this includes for animals as NO YES well) Liquid soap NO YES Eye contact cleaner NO YES Liquid or paste make-up remover NO YES Paint and metal cleaners and removers NO YES NOTE: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Accident Report: American Airlines, Inc., Mcdonnell Douglas
    Explosive decompression, American Airlines, Inc., McDonnell Douglas DC-10-10, N103AA, Near Windsor, Ontario, Canada, June 12, 1972 Micro-summary: On climb, this McDonnell Douglas DC-10-10 experienced an opening of a cargo door, explosive decompression, and a main cabin floor collapse, disrupting the flight control system. Event Date: 1972-06-12 at 1925 EST Investigative Body: National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), USA Investigative Body's Web Site: http://www.ntsb.gov/ Cautions: 1. Accident reports can be and sometimes are revised. Be sure to consult the investigative agency for the latest version before basing anything significant on content (e.g., thesis, research, etc). 2. Readers are advised that each report is a glimpse of events at specific points in time. While broad themes permeate the causal events leading up to crashes, and we can learn from those, the specific regulatory and technological environments can and do change. Your company's flight operations manual is the final authority as to the safe operation of your aircraft! 3. Reports may or may not represent reality. Many many non-scientific factors go into an investigation, including the magnitude of the event, the experience of the investigator, the political climate, relationship with the regulatory authority, technological and recovery capabilities, etc. It is recommended that the reader review all reports analytically. Even a "bad" report can be a very useful launching point for learning. 4. Contact us before reproducing or redistributing a report from this anthology. Individual countries have very differing views on copyright! We can advise you on the steps to follow.
    [Show full text]
  • Self Bag Drop Solutions
    Self Bag Drop Solutions daifukuatec.com A leader Enhancing the in airport passenger experience A user-friendly approach solutions We have a deep appreciation for the user Product Benefits experience that we deliver to passengers, • Modern design to suit all and our entire range of Drop–UX solutions Daifuku Airport Technologies is the trusted terminal environments have been designed with simplicity in mind. partner of airport and airlines globally, providing • Simple, fast user interface and Our intuitive touchscreen interface delivers unified solutions across self-service, security ergonomic design clear, graphical prompts throughout each and operational systems. • Future-proof CUSS 1.4 certification step of the check-in process. • Seamless integration with existing Our leading-edge digital solutions continue to baggage handling systems revolutionise airport and airline operations around Passengers scan their boarding the world, enhancing the productivity, accuracy • Short lead-time installations possible pass to authorise their bag drop. and passenger service levels of our partners. Drop–UX supports various biometric • The world’s leading fully automatic Step 1 verification processes, including SBD supplier We are defined by our innovative spirit and ‘face-to-passport’ and ‘single token’. • Multiple integration: direct to Airline enduring partner relationships, facilitated by Network, via Airport platform, via deeply understanding their needs and delivering leading platform providers platform accurate and valued digital solutions and support. The bag is weighed and its and CUSS 1.3 and CUSS Working closely with our partners, we set and dimensions are measured. 1.4 platform achieve strategic objectives that help navigate Drop–UX automatically prompts the passenger if an item is overweight, the complexities of airport operations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Modular Operation Solution to Airport Baggage Transportation
    A Modular Operation Solution to Airport Baggage Transportation University of South Florida 2020 Team members: Zhiwei Chen (Graduate student); Xiaowei Shi (Graduate student) Advisor: Xiaopeng Li (Associate prosessor) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, FL 33620, USA Contents Contents Executive Summary __________________________________________________ 1 Problem statement and background _____________________________________ 3 Summary of literature review ___________________________________________ 5 Airport baggage transportation 5 Vehicle scheduling optimization 6 Modular vehicle operations 7 Problem solving approach _____________________________________________ 9 Description of ideas 9 Analysis method 12 Technical aspects ___________________________________________________ 14 Modular system design 14 Schedule optimization 17 Real-world case study 21 Safety risk assessments ______________________________________________ 27 Industry interactions _________________________________________________ 30 Expected impacts and findings ________________________________________ 33 Appendix A: List of complete contact information _________________________ 41 Appendix B: Description of university ___________________________________ 42 Appendix C: Non-university partners ___________________________________ 43 Appendix D: Sign-off forms ___________________________________________ 44 Appendix E: Education experience from the project _______________________ 45 Appendix F: References ______________________________________________
    [Show full text]