DOCSLIB.ORG

UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The Nostalgia of Change: A History of Mexican Return Migration to Acámbaro, Guanajuato, 1930-2006 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Jesús Pérez Varela Committee in charge: Professor Michael Monteón, Chair Professor David Gutierrez, Co-Chair Professor Luis Alvarez Professor Everard Mead Professor Nancy Postero Professor Daniel Widener 2010 Copyright Jesús Pérez Varela, 2010 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Jesús Pérez Varela is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ Co-Chair __________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2010 iii Dedication To the memory of Peter McNee, Mary Walsh, Mariano Varela, Aureliana Cervantes, and Romana Sánchez. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page .……………………………………………………………………....iii Dedication Page……………………………………………………………………….iv Table of Contents .…………………………………………………………………….v List of Figures………………………………………………………………………….vi List of Tables…………………………………………………………………………..viii Map……………………………………………………………………………………..ix Acknowledgements …………………………………………….……………………..x Vita ………………………………………………………………………………….....xiii Abstract …………………………………………………………………………….....xv Introduction …………………………………………………………………………... 1 Chapter One: The Study of Return Migration A Brief Synopsis ………………………………………………………….......12 Chapter Two: Mexican Repatriation: The Fear of Return……………...………… 32 Chapter Three: A New Welcome: The Bracero Era …..…………………………..75 Chapter Four: Ni de Aqui, Ni de Alla: From Neither Here or Nor There………………………………………......121 Chapter Five: “Cholismo” and the Emergence of Chicano Gang Culture in Acámbaro ………………………………………………...152 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………...193 References ……………………………………………………………………..........202 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Map of Acámbaro, Guanajuato ...…………………………………….3 Figure 2: Bronze Figure of Miguel Hidalgo Y Costilla….………………………5 Figure 3: Anti Chinese Letter…………………………………………………....74 Figure 4: Bracero being checked by a U.S. Inspector.……………………...92 Figure 5: Bracero being Fumigated with DDT………………………………...93 Figure 6: An Insured Bracero…………………………………………………...98 Figure 7: A Bracero Camp……………………………………………………..100 Figure 8: A Bracero cook……………………………………………………….100 Figure 9: A Bracero Camp……………………………………………………...101 Figure 10: “Boots and Sandals”…………………………………………………111 Figure 11: A return migrant’s home…………………………………………….136 Figure 13: A Halloween and Day of the Dead stand………………………….145 Figure 14: Mexican Children trick o treating in Acámbaro……………………145 Figure 15: Graffiti in Teotilan del Valle, Oaxaca……………………………....154 Figure 16: Graffiti………………………………………………………………….166 Figure 17: Graffiti………………………………………………………………….167 Figure 18: Graffiti………………………………………………………………….167 Figure 19: Graffiti………………………………………………………………….167 Figure 20: Graffiti………………………………………………………………….173 Figure 21: Graffiti………………………………………………………………….173 Figure 22: Graffiti………………………………………………………………….174 vi Figure 23: Graffiti………………………………………………………………..175 Figure 24: Two Cholos………………………………………………………….181 Figure 25: Novedades Aztlan…………………………………………………..182 Figure 26: A cholo stand at the Mercado Hidalgo……………………………182 Figure 27: The Nostalgia of Change…………………………………………..193 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Immigration to Mexico from 1911-1923……………………………..70 Table 2: How Mexican braceros would spend their money………………..128 Table 3: Number of undocumented persons apprehended, 1951-1964…113 Table 4: Mexican emigrants living in the U.S., 1960-2006………………...121 Table 5: Emigration to Guanajuato…………………………………………...123 viii Map of Mexico Source: Pickatrail.com ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The song “Truckin,’” by the Grateful Dead, perhaps best represents my experience at UCSD: “Lately it occurs to me, what a long, strange trip it's been.” This process has been a long, strange and hard trip. I quite honestly never imagined I would get this far in academia. I come from a place where academic opportunities are limited and these outcomes just don’t happen. I have been lucky enough along the way to receive support over the years from many, many people who I wish to thank here. If it were not for their guidance and motivation, none of this could have been possible. Thanks first and foremost to my chair, Dr. Michael Monteón, whose guidance, advice, editing suggestions, and patience was essential. My Co-Chair Dr. David Gutierrez helped me in very tough moments of my academic journey and was a big influence in undertaking the challenge of a Ph.D., inspiring me with Walls and Mirrors to be more critical on historical issues. Dr. Luis Alvarez’s advice helped me through several tough moments and is a role model in helping students through this process. Dr. Daniel Widener’s advice on how to survive graduate school was also essential. Dr. Everard Mead taught me what a young professor can achieve and his pedagogical style is a model to follow as he makes classes both challenging and enjoyable. And huge thanks to Dr. Nancy Postero, who came to my rescue in the week of my defense and to whom I will always be grateful. Other faculty and staff members at UCSD have also been fundamental to my experience. My friend and former UCSD professor Dr. David Luft showed me x the skill of balancing academia with a normal life. Dr. Christine Hunefeldt always expressed human concern and support of what I was doing. Dr. Paul Pickowicz and Dr. Pamela Radcliff allowed me to be the Head TA of the department. Latin Americanist bibliographer, Karen Lindvall-Larson was always there when I needed her. Dr. Rosalind Streichler, Director of the Center for Teaching Development taught me fundamental pedagogical methods. To the great staff who showed me the ins and outs of the history department—Carol Larking, Danielle Swenson, Nadyne Nawar, and Maureen McCormack—thank you! Thanks also to my colleagues, cuates, and their families who were there in good and tough moments on this strange trip. Thanks to my mentor and friend, Dr. Miguel La Serna and my compadre Dr. Zacarias Brittsan. To Dr. Tinoco and his family for their friendship and hospitality. To Dr. Stephanie Moore, Dr. Suzana Martinez, Chris Wisniewski, Gloria Gandara, Sara Sanders, Barbara Zepeda, Ricardo Fagoaga, Emily Montgomery, Sjahari Pullom, Todd Welker, Gloria Kim, Jed Mularski, Megan Strom, Alicia Ratterree, Guillermo Gallardo, Angela Morrill, and Jimmy Patiño for their friendships. Regardless of what field we were in and who was ahead of whom in the program, at the end we were all in the same boat. The research of this dissertation ran into several obstacles, namely not having an archive in Acámbaro, Guanajuato. I am grateful to the current archivists, Licenciado José Luis Marcos Pérez Piña and Lincenciada Anahi Bocanegra Solorio, who kept digging under piles of paper underneath the local soccer stadium and in old government warehouses in order for me to have access to archival materials. Thanks to a generous grant by the Apoyo al xi Desarrollo de Archivos y Bibliotecas de México (ADABI) we were able to rescue the archive and now Acámbaro has an archive available to the public and researchers. I would also like to thank the government of the former mayor of Acámbaro César Larrondo Díaz who facilitated access and the process for the archive to exist. In Mexico City I would like to thank Othon Nava who helped guide me through the Archivo General de la Nacion (AGN). Thanks also to the Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores (SRE) and the Archivo de Lerdo de Tejada and their staff for helping me in to look for material relevant to this project. Many, many thanks to the Fagoaga family for their kind hospitality while doing my research in Mexico City. I also want to thank my family, whose immigration history propelled me to explore this topic and look at history from a personal perspective. My father Antonio Pérez Sanchez and my mother Esther Varela Cervantes and my ten siblings histories inspire this project. Thanks to the McNee family, especially my suegra Dolores, who was there for us in every moment of our academic journey. To Kevin and Debbie McNamara whose family always made us feel at home, especially every Sunday. Finally, I want to thank my wife Alison McNee and my two sons Mariano and Cuauhtémoc. Without their love, patience, motivation, and sacrifices, this would have never been achieved. This is dedicated to you. xii VITA 1997 B.A., Interdisciplinary Studies Emphasis on Mexico, Latin American, and Chicano History California State University, Fresno 2001-2002 Foreign Language Area Studies Fellowship San Diego State University M.A. in Latin American Studies Emphasis on Mexico. San Diego State University Hubert Herring Award for Best Master’s Thesis The Pacific Coast Council of Latin American Studies 2002-2004 Teaching Assistant, Department of History University of California, San Diego 2003-2004 Foreign Language Area Studies Fellowship San Diego State University Foreign Language Area Studies Fellowship Oaxaca, Mexico San Diego State University 2006 Dissertation Writing Fellowship Center for Latin American and Iberian Studies University of California, San Diego 2007 Research Grant Center for Study and Race and Ethnicity University of California, San Diego Teacher Assistant, Department of History University of California,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Second Generation
    HISTORY The New Mexican-Americans in Wartime America: riots reflect the state of the Mexican American pop How the "Z-Oot Suit Riots" and the "Second Generation" events shape the future of the Mexican American c Transformed Mexican-American Ethnic Politics Brady Dvorak In this paper, l will show how the unique state oft especially the first US-born generation of Mexican Abstract second generation) - coupled with the anxiety of\ This paper looks at the unique demographic, economic, and cultural state of ethnic Mexicans living of racial tensions in Los Angeles. And, I will sho\\ in the United States during World War II and how the "Zoot Suit Riots" both refl ected the wartime riots" created by the sensationalistic press affected ethnic relations between Latinos and Anglos and influenced the future of Mexican American civil campaign in two ways: (1) Popular interpretation< rights movements. In particular, the riots will be examined within the context of the emergence of a American youth, bridging a correlation between et pachuco youth culture within the second generation of US-born ethnic Mexicans. Newspaper there being any racial discrimination during the ric articles of the time and complimentary research will also show how popular public perception of perception of there being no racial element of disc the events affected the way in which Mexican American community leaders would negotiate the communities. With Mexican American activists or ethnic politics of civil rights until the 1960s. anti-Mexican sentiment, they preached uncompror while ignoring the more complex problems of disc Introduction disparity between Latinos and Anglos in the Unite ne of the most notorious episodes in the history of US ethnic relations, and certainly in Mexican Americans, Pachucos, and World 0 Mexican American history, was the so called "zoot suit riots" that took place in wartime Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • “Mexican Repatriation: New Estimates of Total and Excess Return in The
    “Mexican Repatriation: New Estimates of Total and Excess Return in the 1930s” Paper for the Meetings of the Population Association of America Washington, DC 2011 Brian Gratton Faculty of History Arizona State University Emily Merchant ICPSR University of Michigan Draft: Please do not quote or cite without permission from the authors 1 Introduction In the wake of the economic collapse of the1930s, hundreds of thousands of Mexican immigrants and Mexican Americans returned to Mexico. Their repatriation has become an infamous episode in Mexican-American history, since public campaigns arose in certain locales to prompt persons of Mexican origin to leave. Antagonism toward immigrants appeared in many countries as unemployment spread during the Great Depression, as witnessed in the violent expulsion of the Chinese from northwestern Mexico in 1931 and 1932.1 In the United States, restriction on European immigration had already been achieved through the 1920s quota laws, and outright bans on categories of Asian immigrants had been in place since the 19th century. The mass immigration of Mexicans in the 1920s—in large part a product of the success of restrictionist policy—had made Mexicans the second largest and newest immigrant group, and hostility toward them rose across that decade.2 Mexicans became a target for nativism as the economic collapse heightened competition for jobs and as welfare costs and taxes necessary to pay for them rose. Still, there were other immigrants, including those from Canada, who received substantially less criticism, and the repatriation campaigns against Mexicans stand out in several locales for their virulence and coercive nature. Repatriation was distinct from deportation, a federal process.
    [Show full text]
  • Borderlands of the Rio Grande Valley: Where Two Worlds
    BORDERLANDS OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY: WHERE TWO WORLDS BECOME ONE by Nora Lisa Cavazos, M.A. A thesis submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts with a Major in International Studies August 2014 Committee Members: Paul Hart, Chair John McKiernan-Gonzalez Robert Gorman COPYRIGHT by Nora Lisa Cavazos 2014 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public law94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgment. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As copyright holder of this work I, Nora Lisa Cavazos authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would sincerely like to thank my family for inspiring me to write about the reality of such a complicatedly beautiful place. Without the love and support from my Mom, Dad, Linda, Melissa, David, Noah, and Jaeden, none of this would have been possible. For all the times they extended their home, their food, and their stress relieving techniques, I am undoubtedly thankful. A big thank you to Dr. Paul Hart, Dr. John McKiernan-Gonzalez, and Dr. Robert Gorman for encouraging my study of the Rio Grande Valley, the place I love the most, and for pushing me beyond what I knew I was capable of.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Veteranos—Latinos in WWII
    Los Veteranos—Latinos in WWII Over 500,000 Latinos (including 350,000 Mexican Americans and 53,000 Puerto Ricans) served in WWII. Exact numbers are difficult because, with the exception of the 65th Infantry Regiment from Puerto Rico, Latinos were not segregated into separate units, as African Americans were. When war was declared on December 8, 1941, thousands of Latinos were among those that rushed to enlist. Latinos served with distinction throughout Europe, in the Pacific Theater, North Africa, the Aleutians and the Mediterranean. Among other honors earned, thirteen Medals of Honor were awarded to Latinos for service during WWII. In the Pacific Theater, the 158th Regimental Combat Team, of which a large percentage was Latino and Native American, fought in New Guinea and the Philippines. They so impressed General MacArthur that he called them “the greatest fighting combat team ever deployed in battle.” Latino soldiers were of particular aid in the defense of the Philippines. Their fluency in Spanish was invaluable when serving with Spanish speaking Filipinos. These same soldiers were part of the infamous “Bataan Death March.” On Saipan, Marine PFC Guy Gabaldon, a Mexican-American from East Los Angeles who had learned Japanese in his ethnically diverse neighborhood, captured 1,500 Japanese soldiers, earning him the nickname, the “Pied Piper of Saipan.” In the European Theater, Latino soldiers from the 36th Infantry Division from Texas were among the first soldiers to land on Italian soil and suffered heavy casualties crossing the Rapido River at Cassino. The 88th Infantry Division (with draftees from Southwestern states) was ranked in the top 10 for combat effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in the Hired Farm W( Force, 1945-J
    ? Aq& ■CJ ^afís, UnMed States *ii! Oepartmjintof Agricunure Trends in the Economic Research Service Hired Farm W( Agriculture Information Bulletin Force, 1945-J Number 561 Victor J. Olivetra ^ 'f W' 917698 Want Another Copy? It's Easy. Just dial 1-800-999-6779. Toll free. Ask for Trends in the Hired Farm Worl< Force, 1945-87 {AIB-561 ). The cost is $3 per copy. For non-U.S. addresses, add 25 percent (includes Canada). Charge your purchase to your VISA or MasterCard, or we can bill you. Or send a check or purchase order (made payable to ERS-NASS) to: ERS-NASS P.O. Box 1608 Rockville, MD 20850. We'll fill your order via 1st class mail. Trends In the Hired Farm Work Force, 1945-87. By Victor J, Oüveira, Agriculture and Rural Economy Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 561. Abstract New technology, nonfarm labor conditions, farm prices, and government policies have altered both the size and composition of the hired farm work force. Average annual farm employment dropped 70 percent between 1945 and 1987. Although family members continue to provide the major portion of agricultural labor, hired farmworl<ers contribute relatively more labor now, 36 percent in 1987 compared with 22 percent in 1945. The numbers of domestic workers and legally admitted foreign nationals doing hired farmwork have stabilized in recent years after wide variations responding to wartime labor shortages, changes in government work programs, and increased mechanization. The number of illegal aliens working in U.S. agriculture is unknown owing to lack of accurate data, but the increase in apprehensions of these aliens after 1965 suggests a large population.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Pages
    Table of Contents Preface . .vii How to Use This Book . .xi Research Topics for Defining Moments: The Zoot Suit Riots . .xiii NARRATIVE OVERVIEW Prologue . .3 Chapter One:Caught in the Currents of Empire and Conquest . .7 Chapter Two: Rising Tensions in California . .25 Chapter Three: A City on Edge . .43 Chapter Four: The Trial of the 38th Street Boys . .59 Chapter Five: The Zoot Suit Riots . .75 Chapter Six: Release from Prison . .91 Chapter Seven: Legacy of the Zoot Suit Riots . .107 BIOGRAPHIES Fletcher Bowron (1887-1968) . .125 Mayor of Los Angeles during the Sleepy Lagoon Trial and Zoot Suit Riots José Díaz (1919-1942) . .128 Mexican Farm Worker Whose Murder Resulted in the Sleepy Lagoon Trial Charles William Fricke (1882-1958) . .131 Judge Who Presided over the 1943 Sleepy Lagoon Murder Trial Alice Greenfield (1917-2009) . .134 Civil Rights Activist and Member of the Sleepy Lagoon Defense Committee v Defining Moments: The Zoot Suit Riots Henry “Hank” Leyvas (1923-1971) . .137 Mexican-American Defendant in the Sleepy Lagoon Murder Trial Carey McWilliams (1905-1980) . .141 American Journalist and Attorney Who Headed the Sleepy Lagoon Defense Committee Edward Roybal (1916-2005) . .145 First Hispanic-American Member of the Los Angeles City Council and Longtime U.S. Representative George Shibley (1910-1989) . .148 Defense Attorney in the Sleepy Lagoon Murder Trial PRIMARY SOURCES Anglo Squatters Swarm Mexican-Owned Haciendas in California . .153 Examples of Anti-Mexican Discrimination in 1930s America . .156 Depression-Era Los Angeles Targets Mexicans for Repatriation . .161 A Los Angeles Police Officer Issues a Racist Report on the Mexican “Element” .
    [Show full text]
  • Finalinvoluntary Deportations Lesson Plan
    Identity, Immigration and Economics: The Involuntary Deportations of the 1930s (For use with Episode 2) Lesson Overview This particular lesson examines the involuntary deportations of Mexican immigrants and U.S. citizens of Mexican heritage during the 1930s. This displacement is only one of many legally sanctioned, forced relocations in our nation’s history. It also is an example of how a certain population may be scapegoated during times of economic downturn — and how there is an ongoing tie between immigration policies on the one hand, and economic trends on the other. Students analyze primary accounts and images from the 1930s, develop new vocabulary related to relocation, and demonstrate their understanding through creative writing. (Elements of this lesson were adapted from http://www.learnnc.org/lp/pages/4042.) Grade Level: 7 – 12 Time: 2 – 3 Hours (1 – 2 class periods) Materials • Internet access for research and viewing segment (Los Angeles Deportation) • Copies of student handout, Involuntary Deportation Images and Writing Prompts • Paper and pencils for note-taking and assignment writing/completion • Dictionary (print or online) Lesson Objectives The student will: 1. Define and discuss the difference between immigration, repatriation, deportation, resettlement and internment. 2. Identify the deportation of documented Mexican immigrants and Mexican Americans during the Great Depression. 3. Present her/his learning to the class in the form of a vivid description of the individuals being deported and participate in a class debate on reasons for and against deportation. 4. Understand the importance and significance of the involuntary deportations of the 1930s. 5. Analyze the deportations in the context of immigration policies as connected to economic factors.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Barbara Journal of Transnational American Studies
    UC Santa Barbara Journal of Transnational American Studies Title Excerpt from Zoot Suit: The Enigmatic Career of an Extreme Style Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/78k1r8vc Journal Journal of Transnational American Studies, 4(2) Author Peiss, Kathy Publication Date 2012 DOI 10.5070/T842015761 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Excerpted from Kathy Peiss, Zoot Suit: The Enigmatic Career of an Extreme Style (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011). 6 For JTASZooting Around use the World only ‘‘ ome authorities feel that the only thing to do is to let the whole myste- rious business wear itself out and disappear through inner exhaus- Stion of its possibilities,’’ reported Agnes Meyer in the wake of the Los Angeles riot.1 In fact, it was much harder than those authorities thought to shrug off the zoot suit. During the war and for decades there- after, this style traveled across time and place, appealing to youths whose lives otherwise diverged. It turned up in wartime Great Britain and Aus- tralia, despite orders by their governments to conserve cloth for the du- ration. Bahamian farm hands, brought to Florida to pick crops, surprised their hosts by appearing in zoot suits. Canada had its own versions of zoot-suit unrest in the summer of 1944, and in occupied France, zazous sporting long coats and narrow trousers outraged officials. After the war, young people in other countries—from the stiliagi of the Soviet Union to the tsotsis of South Africa—picked up and adapted elements of an extreme style that had originated in American culture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bracero Program (1942-1964) a Critical Appraisal
    THE BRACERO PROGRAM (1942-1964) A CRITICAL APPRAISAL JORGE DURAND ABSTRACT. Because of its dimension and duration, the Bracero Program (1942-1964) has been perhaps the most relevant example worldwide of a Temporary Workers Program. However, it has been widely criticized and not thoroughly studied. This article uses documents from the time to reappraise the pros and cons of the Bracero Program and re- formulates the possibility of a future program of temporary workers for Mexico and the United States. KEYWORDS: Bracero Program, Migration, Temporary Workers, Mexico, United States. 2007 SECOND SEMESTER 25 MIGRACIÓN Y DESARROLLO JORGE DURAND THE BRACERO PROGRAM INTRODUCTION he discussion about the relevance of a bilateral agreement to develop a new program for migrant workers makes it essential to look back on the Bracero Program. Although it is an old topic, it still contains rectifi- able mistakes and wise examples. The Bracero Program has ultimately Tbeen the largest and most far-reaching and consistent effort to think and reflect on this topic and the problem of temporary contracts for migrant workers. The immediate background of the Bracero Program was the labor-recruiting system known as enganche (“hooking”) and the mass deportations from the 1920s and 1930s. Both modes of recruiting and managing migrant labor were dreadful. The enganche system, a private business of the recruiting agencies, was a model of extreme exploitation that left recruitment, transportation, salaries, internal man- agement of labor camps and work loads in private hands. The consequences of this system were unfair contracts, eternal indebtedness, miserable life condi- tions, child labor, private police and recruitment agencies (Durand, 1993, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Quiz Study Guide 1 Sp 2013.Docx.Docx
    MAS 10B Quiz #1 Study Guide Acuña: ● What is wrong with the myth that the U.S. “liberated” the land which was “unoccupied?” And to what extent was America NOT the “land of opportunity” for people of Mexican descent in the early 1900s? ● Name at least one positive outcome of the mining strikes and labor organizing in the mines. ● What led to the dramatic growth of population in the Southwest? ● Why were growers and capitalists forced to look toward Blacks in the South and Mexicans in the Southwest for the labor force at the end of the 1800s and into the early 1900s? ● What were some of the characteristics and conditions of the different types of labor (railroad, mining, farm work, for example)? ● How did Mexicans respond to the poor labor conditions in the fields and orchards? ● Flores Magon Brothers ● Why did Anti-Mexican hysteria develop as a result of the Great Depression of the 1930s? How does the nation react, both through policy and the treatment of Mexican Americans? Give specific examples of policies that affect Mexican Americans. ● Mutualistas ● Why was there a sharp increase of Mexican migration north during 1910-1920? ● “Mexican Schools”/Lemon Grove Incident ● Explain “Barrioization” and the factors that lead to the creation of ethnic enclaves. Describe the experience/s of at least one urban Mexican American community as detailed in Acuña. ● Repatriation/Federal Deportation Programs ● When did the Repatriation acts take place? ● What does Repatriation mean literally? ● What were the main causes of the Great Depression? ● Emma Tenayucca ● Rosalio Ronquillo ● LULAC ● Why did LULAC want to separate themselves from Mexican Immigrants? ● How was the participation and goals of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicano Latino Studies 139 the Bracero Guest Worker Program
    Chicano Latino Studies 139 The Bracero Program Winter 2010 ELH 110 Gilbert G. Gonzalez, Instructor Esther Castillo, Sociology, TA SSPA 4123 SSPA 4102 [email protected] Office Hours: By Appointment Hours: Mon. & Wed. 1:30-2:30pm [email protected] ph: 4-5273 ph: 4-9908 (only during office hours) Course Description In 1942 the United States negotiated a guest worker agreement with Mexico known as the Bracero Program. Proponents, primarily corporate agriculture, justified it as a means for overcoming a wartime labor shortage. However, other reasons were involved in the decision making. The conventional explanation for the Program remains to this day a shortage of labor, but labor unionism was widespread in the 1930s, especially in California, and appears to be the more important reason for implementing the Program. The Program lasted into 1964, long after the war ended, and brought into the United States an untold number of men, and only men, estimated by some to number about 5 million to work mainly in agriculture. During the 22 years of the Program a number of severe criticisms were directed at the Program which ranged from accusations of outright slavery to a means to destroy labor unionism in agriculture. However, the U.S. government, which administered the Program, and the employers of braceros consistently maintained that highest labor standards were strictly observed. Via an emphasis on film, the course will examine the Program in detail, including but not limited to: the reasons why the Program was implemented; the work performed; the treatment of the men; their wages and living standards; the effects on the economy of Mexico; the main beneficiaries and a host of other aspects relevant to the Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Braceros, Mexicans, Americans, and Schools: (Re) Imagining Teaching and Learning in Mexican America
    Braceros, Mexicans, Americans, and Schools: (Re) imagining Teaching and Learning in Mexican America Francisco Guajardo, University of Texas-Pan American Stephanie Alvarez, University of Texas-Pan-American Miguel Guajardo, Texas State University Samuel García Jr., Texas State University José Ángel Guajardo, Mexicano Elder Jocabed Márquez, Texas State University This article examines the stories of Braceros, Mexican contract workers who participated in an international labor agreement between the United States and México between 1942 and 1964. The stories Braceros tell challenge some conventional historiographical notions that they were powerless agents and victims of exploitative labor practices. The stories shed new light regarding the kinds of agency and power Braceros actually displayed in negotiating certain circumstances specific to their work. Ángel: Prisciliano de La Cruz y yo nos Angel: Prisciliano de la Cruz and I met in conocimos en el 1941 cuando teníamos seis 1941, when we were six years old and años y éramos alumnos de primaria en la primary school students in a rural school in escuela rural en rancho de San Felipe, en el the village of San Felipe, in the northern norte de México en el estado de Nuevo León. Mexican state of Nuevo Leon. Our school La escuela fue construida como parte de una was built as part of President Lázaro iniciativa rural del Presidente Lázaro Cardenas’ rural development initiatives of the Cárdenas durante los años treinta. Prisciliano 1930s. Prisciliano and I formed a strong bond y yo formamos una buena relación de amistad as kids and shared experiences that would como niños y vivimos experiencias juntos que last a lifetime, even though we spent time durarían una vida entera aunque sólo together only during that one year in school.
    [Show full text]