Flood Risk Assessment

Property:

17 Cherry Tree Drive GL7 1PJ

Friday, 26 February 2021

Proposed Development:

Two-storey Extension

Contents:

1. Site Research 2. Development Description 3. Flood Risk Assessment 4. Flood Resistance & Resilience Plans

Page 1 of 16 1. Site Research

Property: 17 Cherry Tree Drive, Cirencester GL7 1PJ

Development class: Simple, low risk house extension development

Flood risk zone: 2

The proposed development site lies towards the edge of flood risk zone 2, an identified secondary receptor of a wider flood area of the that runs along the Western side of Cirencester town, running North to South and eventually joining the around .

Page 2 of 16 SP0300 SP0300 403411 403311 403375 403325 200697 403350 403400 200697 SP0300 SP0300 403411 403311 200697 200697 403375 403325 403350 403400

200675 200675

CHERRY

22

TREE

DRIVE

200650 200650

200675 200675

15

CHERRY

22 200625 200625 TREE

DRIVE 20M

Wynarth

200600 200600 0 200597 200597

SP0300 403325 403350 403375 403400 SP0300 403311 403411

200650 200650

SCALE 1:1250 @A3

OS LOCATION & BLOCK LAYOUT PLAN

15

IMPORTANT 200625 200625 Adjustments may be required. This drawing and dimensions are provided as a visual guide only. Dimensions are not accurate as building variations are too great for precision measurement in all areas. 20M

Far It is the responsibility of all Contractors Mead to physically set-out all positions, Court measure and make all necessary adjustments prior to ordering materials Wynarth and prior to and during construction.

Copyright ©2020 Designrock Ltd. Any article recorded in this drawing is protected by design right. The 200600 200600 information contained in this drawing is confidential. It may not be copied, 0 reproduced or transmitted without 200597 200597 permission.

cotswoldarchitectural.design

SP0300 403325 403350 403375 403400 SP0300 403311 403411

HEGARTY TWO STOREY EXTENSION SCALE 1:500@A3 10/2/21 OS LOCATION & BLOCK LAYOUT PLAN 327 07A SITEMAP

A3

1.1 Extracts from Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (2016) by JBA Consulting

A Historical flooding information

A.1 Introduction

Cotswold District in recent years has seen a number of large scale flood events including Easter and October 1998, autumn 2000, February 2002, New Year 2003, February 2004, summer 2007, November/ December 2012 and winter 2013/14. The Environment Agency has produced a number of historic flood outlines within the District and the following events have been mapped: March 1947, July 1968, August 1977, September 1992, October 1993, April 1998, December 2000, July 2007, January 2008. The Environment Agency has provided historic fluvial flood outlines which are illustrated in Map 1.

A.1.1 Winter 2013/14

Flooding problems were experienced in known flood risk areas e.g. Cirencester and . Sewer flooding problems were again at Lakeside, . The flood events did test the recently constructed defences at Moreton-in-Marsh and Fairford which were considered to have performed well.

A.1.2 November/ December 2012

CDC provided a list of properties, businesses, roads and carparks flooded during the December 2012 flood event. Full addresses or postcodes were not available for all of these records, so it has not been possible to geo-reference them. The data should be considered only as indicative of a flooding problem, for the following reasons:

Page 3 of 16 1. It only includes incidents where CDC was notified. Very short flash floods will, in some cases, result in property flooding before a contact can be made to the local authority. In other cases, residents or businesses make their own arrangements for protecting properties.

2. No reason for flooding is recorded.

The records were cleaned and combined into a single spreadsheet, which has been used to summarise numbers of incidents by road name and by settlement. This summary is presented below, see Table A-1 and Table A-2.

A.1.3 July 20071

During the July 2007 event, Cotswold District Council received over 1,150 reports of flooded homes and businesses. Approximately 40% of these properties were located in Moreton-in- Marsh, Bourton-on-the-Water and Chipping Campden to the north of the district. In total, 79 towns and villages across the Cotswold District are known to have been affected by the floods in summer 2007.

Rivers were reported as a source of flooding in 42 of the 79 (53%) locations affected. The flooded over 100 homes and businesses in Naunton and Bourton-on-the-Water, while the River Churn flooded parts of Cirencester. The River Thames at Lechlade reached record levels and there were over 100 reports of property flooding at the confluence of the Thames and . The northernmost part of the District is located within the Avon catchment. The River Cam, a sub catchment of the Avon, caused severe flooding to a number of residential properties and businesses in Chipping Campden.

Some of the areas worst-affected by surface water flooding included Moreton-In-Marsh, Fairford and Whelford. Additionally, Thames Water has identified nine areas where properties were flooded internally by sewers (Fairford, South Cerney, Ampney St Peter, Ampney St Mary, Upper and Lower Slaughter, Moreton-in- Marsh, Bourton-on-the-Water, Quenington). However, it recognises that there were many other areas where sewers caused flooding to gardens and open spaces. Further, groundwater was reported as a source of flooding in nine locations. Blewbury Rd East Hagbourne, report on flooding of 20th July 20072

The flooding followed unprecedented rainfall; the wettest-ever May to July period since national records began in 1766. The Centre for Ecology and Hydrology3 states that May to July produced hydrological conditions with no close modern parallel for the summer period in and Wales. Met Office records show that an average of 414mm of rain fell across England and Wales during a three month period - 228mm greater than the average May to July rainfall recorded. The Environment Agency prepared reports detailing the flooding during the 2007 event in the following areas:

Buscott and Kelmscott4

Fairford, Whelford Kempsford and Lechlade5

Burford, Bourton-on-the-Water, Naunton, Lower Slaughter6

River Churn and Ampney Brook7

Moreton-in-Marsh, , Milton-under-Wychwood, Shipton-under-Wychwood, Ascott under- Wychwood, and .8

The Environment Agency's review attributed the widespread flooding to be primarily caused by the sheer volume of water and inability of the overloaded drainage systems including drains, ditches, streams and rivers to convey the flood water.

Appendix B Summary Sheets provides further details relating to historic events in particular settlements.

A.1.5 October 19931

Page 4 of 16 The October 1993 flood event affected small rural areas along the to the east of Sydenham Farm, west of Daylesford and along the District boundary to the west of .

A.1.6 September 1992

The September 1992 flood event mainly affected locations along the River Thames, River Leach, River Churn and Ampney Brook. Along the River Thames, the historic flood outlines extend predominantly onto rural floodplain with some properties located within the historic flood outline at Somerford Keynes and Kempsford. To the East of , Baxters Farm is located within the historic flood outline for the River Leach; some rural areas along the Ampney Brook by Ampney St Peter and along the River Windrush and a supermarket adjacent to the River Churn are all shown to lie within the September 1992 flood outline.

A.1.7 August 1977

The August 1977 event also affected locations along the River Thames, but was smaller in magnitude than the March 1947 flood event. The historic flood outlines indicate that flooding was predominantly experienced in rural locations with some flooding to the Mobile Home Park to the east of Lechlade on Thames. The primary cause of the August 1977 flooding was thought to be local drainage problems and surface water.

A.1.8 July 1968

The July 1968 event occurred on the Knee Brook affecting a number of commercial and residential properties and a sewage works at Chipping Campden. A number of properties were also affected along an unnamed watercourse at Weston-sub-Edge.

A.1.9 March 1947

The March 1947 flood event that occurred on the River Thames, Flagham Brook, Swill Brook and River Churn flooded parts of the District in both rural and urban locations affecting a number of residential and commercial properties. The main locations affected include properties along the River Thames through Ewen, Somerford Keynes, the Caravan Park by , Kempsford and Lechlade on Thames. Along the River Churn a Water Sports Centre and residential properties at Cerney Wick were also affected.

B.6 Cirencester & Siddington

Historic Flooding

• December 1929 – Nine streets flooded after prolonged wet autumn (5).

• March 1947 – Parts of Cirencester flooded in snowmelt flood that affected the whole Thames catchment (5).

• 1990 - River Churn – several residential properties affected at Watermoor (6)

• December 2000/Jan 2001- properties, roads and gardens affected in Cirencester and Siddington (6)

• Jan 2003 – One property flooded in the Watermoor area (6)

• July 2007 - Estimated 15-20 properties flooded in Chesterton area and 40-45 in Watermoor and other areas plus 1-5 in Siddington. Flooding was from the River Churn and rapid surface water runoff (2)

• November/December 2012 - Around 45-50 properties flooded due to high levels in River Churn causing urban drainage network to back up.

• Winter 2013/14 - Similar flooding problems with high levels in River Churn causing urban drainage network to back up.

Page 5 of 16 Sources

• Heavy rainfall • Fluvial (predominantly driven by groundwater inputs, typically long duration events) • Blockages in urban drainage • Reservoir (The Lake)

Pathways

• Channel exceedance and floodplain flows from the River Churn and tributaries. • Urban drainage - sewers, drains and gullies. • Surface water runoff e.g. fields on north side of Swindon Road

Receptors

• Domestic houses and commercial properties (for e.g. Tesco) • Mill Place • Powell’s School • Abbey Grounds • City Bank recreation ground • Kingsmead

In Cirencester, roads such as:

- Barton Lane - Spitalgate Lane - Trafalgar Road - Hereward Road - Hakeburn Road - Beeches Road - London Road - Countess Lillias Road - Siddington Road - Rose Way - Cherry Tree Drive - Cricklade Road - Swindon Road

In Siddington, roads such as:

- South Cerney Road - The Common - Park Way

Flood Warning

Cirencester and Siddington are within an Environment Agency flood warning and alert area.

Available survey/detailed modelling

Cirencester and Siddington are within the area covered by the River Churn ISIS- TUFLOW model (Environment Agency, last updated 2011) (16)

Flood Defences

Page 6 of 16 • There are a number of control structures on the River Churn through Cirencester ( Road sluices, Barton Mill sluice, Gumstool Brook sluice and New Mill sluices). The Environment Agency have made improvements to formalise their operation for flood risk management.

• The first phase of the Churn Flood Risk Management Strategy, which included local improvements, has been completed. The next phase will focus on the maintenance and renewal of existing flood defence assets with the storage area a possible longer term option.The general standard of protection is 3.3% AEP (1 in 30) and up to 1.33% AEP (1 in 75) at Watermoor. A flood storage scheme has been proposed upstream of Cirencester as a longer term option if funding can be secured.

• Culverts under the Spitalgate Lane area are suspected to have been blocked in the 2012 event. This is currently under investigation by the Environment Agency.

• Culverts are present at Abbey Grounds/Park Street, at the end of Barton Lane, Hereward Road, Spitalgate Lane and The Plough. Gloucester Road.

• River Churn benefits from bank protection along its course through Cirencester, specifically at the Abbey Grounds to Corinium Gate; London Road Cirencester, at Mitsubishi Motors, Watermoor; The Willows, City Bank Lane; and at Riverside Walk off Thomas Street.

Fluvial flood risk:

Map 1 (Cirencester & Siddington) shows the fluvial flood risk in Cirencester & Siddington. Select layer Flood Zone 3a to view the zone which comprises of land assessed as having a 1 in 100 or greater annual probability of river flooding (>1%) in any given year. Select layer Flood Zone 2 to view the zone which comprises of land assessed as having between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000 annual probability of river flooding (1% – 0.1%) in any year.

Depth, hazard and velocity: Map 1 shows the results of hydraulic modelling on the River Churn, including depth and hazard layers for the 100 year plus climate change event. Depths through the built areas of town are generally under 0.3m except in areas of ponding such as school fields and the Watermoor area. Hazards are generally low at the 5% AEP, low to moderate at the 1% AEP and moderate at the 0.1% AEP. The highest hazards are in open areas where water ponds to significant depths. Blockage of culverts on the River Churn in the Spitalgate Lane area may have contributed to fluvial flood risk.

Surface Water flood risk:

Map 2 (Cirencester & Siddington) shows the uFMfSW. The user can click to display the 1 in 30, 1 in 100 and 1 in 1000 year risk areas.

Surface water runoff from the highways and urban area contributes to the exceedence of capacity in the surface water sewers, particularly in the Spitalgate area. The uFMfSW shows isolated areas of ponding and road flooding across Cirencester, and a distinct flow path through residential areas in the north east.

Groundwater flood risk:

Map 2 (Cirencester & Siddington) describes the Area Susceptible to Groundwater Flooding (AStGWF). The River Churn’s catchment is highly permeable and its flows are predominantly driven by high groundwater levels. This was demonstrated in the November/December 2012 event, when river levels were maintained at a high level for a long period of time. The Environment Agency’s log of groundwater related incidents has several entries in the Cirencester area where flooding of cellars and flooding from under floors has been reported. The AStGWF map suggests a varied risk (low to high risk) of groundwater flood emergence, with the highest risk indicated in Upper Siddington.

Page 7 of 16 Reservoir flood risk:

The Environment Agency's Risk of Flooding from Reservoirs map (REF) suggests there is a risk of reservoir flooding from The Mansion Lake at Cirencester Park. If this failed, flooding would affect the area around the A419 junction, and flow across town roughly between Sheep Street/Trinity Road and Watermoor Road before joining the River Churn floodplain.

Sewer flood risk:

Map 2 (Cirencester & Siddington) illustrates the incidents of sewer flooding recorded in CDC. A significant pathway of flooding in November 2012 was surcharging of the surface water sewer network due to high river levels in the River Churn. This affected the Spitalgate/Trafalgar Road area. Some properties were also affected by foul sewer flooding. The Thames Water sewer flooding register has aa total of 27 incidents in postcode area GL7 1 and 5 in GL7 2.

Effects of climate change:

Climate change is likely to increase the frequency and severity of fluvial flooding from the River Churn. Hydraulic modelling of the River Churn through Cirencester and Siddington (16) predicts an increase in the 100 year flood outline with climate change, particularly affecting the London Road and Purley Road areas.

Climate change is predicted to result in more frequent occurrences of extreme/ heavy rainfall events, increasing the likelihood of incidents of surface water flooding.

In relation to groundwater, the effect of climate change is less certain. Milder wetter winters may increase the frequency of groundwater flooding incidents but warmer drier summers may counteract this effect.

Comments on constraints to proposed sites (e.g. development not permitted/Exception Test required)

All sites have been assessed with regard to key flood indicators, such as the Environment Agency Flood Zones, uFMfSW, local evidence and proximity to watercourses, see Table 5-2 and 5-3 in the SFRA. The following sites will be required to pass an Exception Test in accordance with NPPF: • C-89 - Falls within Flood Zone 3a, 3a+CC and 2. Highly Vulnerable development is not permitted in Flood Zone 3a. More Vulnerable development would be required to pass the Exception Test. Covered by River Churn model. Northern side of site is inundated in a 100+CC event. Depths are <0.2m in a 100+CC event, <0.5m in a 1000yr, hazard low in a 100+CC, low to medium in a 1000yr. It would be possible to provide safe access and egress at ground level to Victoria Road in a 1000 year event. Site design would need to be safe and not increase flood risk elsewhere to pass the Exception Test.

1.2 Cherry Tree Drive

The owners have lived at the property for 5 years.

The only events we have been able to find relating specifically to Cherry Tree Drive occurred In January 2014, where inches of water and raw sewage were reported coming from the network of storm drains and sewers following an intense rain event.

Roadside drains in Cherry Tree Drive were overflowing at the end of December 2020, but there was no ingress to homes or gardens. Thames Water carried out remedial works to the sewer network. Flooding occurred in the nearby village of Siddington at that time.

Page 8 of 16 2. Development Description

Two storey front extension to 3 bedroom detached house to provide a fourth bedroom with ensuite and greater living space on the ground floor.

BED 2 BED 1 PLAY KITCHEN

LOUNGE

BED 3 WC BATHROOM

EXISTING GROUND-FLOOR EXISTING FIRST-FLOOR EXISTING ELEVATION SOUTH EAST 0 5M Scale: 1:100 @A3

IMPORTANT

Adjustments may be required. This drawing and dimensions are provided as a visual guide only. Dimensions are not accurate as building variations are too great for precision measurement in all areas.

It is the responsibility of all Contractors to physically set-out all positions, measure and make all necessary adjustments prior to ordering materials and prior to and during construction.

Copyright ©2020 Designrock Ltd. Any article recorded in this drawing is protected by design right. The information contained in this drawing is confidential. It may not be copied, reproduced or transmitted without permission.

cotswoldarchitectural.design

HEGARTY TWO STOREY EXTENSION

9/2/21 EXISTING ELEVATION NORTH EAST EXISTING ELEVATION NORTH WEST 327 05A EXISTING

A3

BED 3 BED 2 KITCHEN PLAY

DINING

BED 4 WC BATHROOM

STUDY

ST. LOUNGE 2320 BED 1 MASTER ENS. 4900

Reuse existing lounge window

5640 4005

PROPOSED GROUND-FLOOR PROPOSED FIRST-FLOOR PROPOSED ELEVATION SOUTH EAST 0 5M Scale: 1:100 @A3

IMPORTANT

Adjustments may be required. This drawing and dimensions are provided as a visual guide only. Dimensions are not accurate as building variations are too great for precision measurement in all areas.

It is the responsibility of all Contractors to physically set-out all positions, measure and make all necessary adjustments prior to ordering materials and prior to and during construction. 3D LIVE-VIEW MODEL HYPERLINK > Copyright ©2020 Designrock Ltd. Any article recorded in this drawing is protected by design right. The information contained in this drawing is confidential. It may not be copied, reproduced or transmitted without permission.

cotswoldarchitectural.design

HEGARTY TWO STOREY EXTENSION

9/2/21 PROPOSED ELEVATION NORTH EAST PROPOSED ELEVATION NORTH WEST 327 06A PROPOSED

A3

Page 9 of 16 3. Flood Risk Assessment

3.1 LIDAR Height Data (100 x 100 Metres)

OS MasterMap® topography, OS Terrain 5 Contours (0.5M) and Digital Terrain Modelling

The road height falls away from property 17 Cherry Tree Drive from ‘0’ (103.56M OS Datum) to -1000mm (102.56M OS Datum) 403411 SP0300 403311 SP0300 403375 403325 403350 403400 200697 200697

102.89 102.88 102.99 103.10 103.20 103.31 103.41 103.52 103.63 103.73 103.84 103.95 104.00103.99 103.95 103.90 103.86 103.82 103.77 103.73 103.68

102.89 102.87 102.92 103.02 103.13 103.24 103.34 103.45 103.56 103.66 103.77 103.87 103.92 103.87 103.83 103.79 103.74 103.70 103.66 103.61

102.89 102.87 102.85 102.95 103.06 103.17 103.27 103.38 103.48 103.59 103.70 103.80 103.85 103.80 103.76 103.72 103.67 103.63 103.59 103.54

102.88 102.86 102.85 102.88 102.99 103.09 103.20 103.31 103.41 103.52 103.63 103.73 103.77 103.73 103.69 103.64 103.60 103.56 103.51 103.47

102.88 102.86 102.84 102.83 102.92 103.02 103.13 103.24 103.34 103.45 103.55 103.66 103.70 103.66 103.62 103.57 103.53 103.49 103.44 103.40 200675 200675

102.88 102.86 102.84 102.82 102.84 102.95 103.06 103.16 103.27 103.38 103.48 103.59 103.63 103.59 103.54 103.50 103.46 103.41 103.37 103.33

102.87 102.86 102.84 102.82 102.80 102.88 102.99 103.09 103.20 103.30 103.41 103.52 103.56 103.52 103.47 103.43 103.39 103.34 103.30 103.26

102.87 102.85 102.84 102.82 102.80 102.81 102.91 103.02 103.13 103.23 103.34 103.45103.50 103.49 103.44 103.40 103.36 103.31 103.27 103.23 103.18

102.89 102.85 102.83 102.82 102.80 102.78 102.84 102.95 103.06 103.16 103.27 103.37 103.42 103.37 103.33 103.29 103.24 103.20 103.16 103.11

102.94 102.87 102.83 102.81 102.79 102.78 102.77 102.88 102.98 103.09 103.20 103.30 103.34 103.30 103.26 103.21 103.17 103.13 103.08 103.04 200650 200650

102.98 102.91 102.85 102.81 102.79 102.77 102.76 102.81 102.91 103.02 103.12 103.23 103.27 103.23 103.19 103.14 103.10 103.06 103.01 102.97

103.00

103.02 102.96 102.89 102.83 102.79 102.77 102.75 102.73 102.84 102.95 103.05 103.16 103.20 103.16 103.12 103.07 103.03 102.99 102.94 102.90

103.06 103.00 102.93 102.87 102.81 102.77 102.75 102.73 102.77 102.88 102.98 103.09 103.13 103.09 103.04 103.00 102.96 102.91 102.87 102.83

103.10 103.04 102.97 102.91 102.85 102.79 102.75 102.73 102.71 102.80 102.91 103.02 103.06 103.02 102.97 102.93 102.89 102.84 102.80 102.76

103.14 103.08 103.02 102.95 102.89 102.83 102.76 102.73 102.71 102.73 102.84 102.94 102.99 102.94 102.90 102.86 102.81 102.77 102.73 102.68 200625 200625

103.00

103.18 103.12 103.06 102.99 102.93 102.87 102.81 102.74 102.71 102.69 102.77 102.87 102.92 102.87 102.83 102.79 102.74 102.70 102.66 102.61

103.23 103.16 103.10 103.04 102.97 102.91 102.85 102.78 102.72 102.69 102.70 102.80 102.84 102.80 102.76 102.71 102.67 102.63 102.58 102.54

103.27 103.20 103.14 103.08 103.01 102.95 102.89 102.83 102.76 102.70 102.66 102.73 102.77 102.73 102.69 102.64 102.60 102.56 102.51 102.47

102.50 103.31 103.24 103.18 103.12 103.06 102.99 102.93 102.87 102.80 102.74 102.68 102.66 102.70 102.66 102.61 102.57 102.53 102.51 102.50 102.49

103.35 103.29 103.22 103.16 103.10 103.03 102.97 102.91 102.84 102.78 102.72 102.66 102.63 102.60 102.59 102.58 102.56 102.55 102.54 102.52 200600 200600

200597 200597

SP0300 403325 403350 403375 403400 SP0300 403311 403411

0 100M

Page 10 of 16 3.2 Long Term Flood Risk, Environment Agency Report and Mapping

Flood risk summary for the area around: 17 CHERRY TREE DRIVE, CIRENCESTER GL7 1PJ

Surface water: High risk

This flood risk summary reports the highest risk from surface water within a 20m radius of this property. High risk means that each year this area has a chance of flooding of greater than 3.3%. This information is suitable for identifying:

• which parts of counties or towns are at risk, or have the most risk • the approximate extent and depth of flooding

It’s unlikely to be reliable for a local area and very unlikely to be reliable for identifying individual properties at risk.

Surface water flooding, sometimes known as flash flooding:

• happens when heavy rain cannot drain away • is difficult to predict as it depends on rainfall volume and location • can happen up hills and away from rivers and other bodies of water • is more widespread in areas with harder surfaces like concrete

Lead local flood authorities (LLFA) are responsible for managing the flood risk from surface water and may hold more detailed information. The LLFA is council.

SURFACE WATER EXTENT OF FLOODING - LOW

Page 11 of 16 SURFACE WATER DEPTH - BELOW 300MM

SURFACE WATER VELOCITY - LESS THAN 0.25M/S

Page 12 of 16 RIVERS AND THE SEA: LOW RISK

This flood risk summary is not property specific. Low risk means that each year this area has a chance of flooding of between 0.1% and 1%. This information is suitable for identifying:

• which parts of towns or streets are at risk, or have the most risk • the approximate extent and depth of flooding

It’s likely to be reliable for a local area but not for identifying individual properties at risk. This service takes into account any flood defences.

The Environment Agency is responsible for managing the flood risk from rivers and the sea.

Other flood risks

Reservoirs

There is a risk of flooding from reservoirs in this area. Flooding from reservoirs is extremely unlikely. An area is considered at risk if peoples’ lives could be threatened by an uncontrolled release of water from a reservoir.

RESERVOIRS EXTENT OF FLOODING - MEDIUM

Page 13 of 16 RESERVOIRS FLOOD WATER DEPTH - BELOW 300MM

RESERVOIRS FLOOD WATER SPEED - BELOW 0.5M/S

Page 14 of 16 4. Flood Resistance & Resilience Plans

Flood mitigation measures include the installation of a flood barrier to the new entrance door, sacrificial plasterboard, rigid PIR cavity wall insulation and higher level electrical sockets and wiring. Rainwater management will include new soak-aways installed to the front garden, to be reviewed with the build contractor.

Fall & Levels Diagram A

SP0300 403311 403411 SP0300 403325 403375 403350 403400 200697 200697

200675 200675

A

200650 200650

B

200625 200625

200600 200600

200597 C 200597

SP0300 403325 403350 403375 403400 SP0300 403311 403411 PROPOSED ELEVATION NORTH EAST 0 100M

Bare Earth Fall:

A>B: -590mm aprx. B>C: -1000mm aprx.

Flood mitigation measures:

Entrance door flood barrier Sacrificial plasterboard Rigid PIR cavity wall insulation Higher level electrical sockets and wiring

Entrance door flood barrier

300mm and below, flood level Electrical sockets Existing internal floor & DPC level

Bare earth line 300 352 148

PROPOSED ELEVATION NORTH WEST

Continued on next page.

Page 15 of 16 Fall & Levels Diagram B

Flood Barrier

Electrical

362mm Flood Depth 211«« d# 106mm Depth inside

Ground level

Page 16 of 16