Vertical Files 2013
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapter 7 100 Years of Groundwater Use and Subsidence in the Upper
Chapter 7 100 Years of Groundwater Use and Subsidence in the Upper Texas Gulf Coast Thomas A. Michel1 Introduction Imagine yourself more than a hundred years ago, living in southeastern Texas. You would have faced many challenges, among others: 100 degree temperatures and 80 percent humidity in the summers, ruthless mosquitoes, roaming alligators, and a whole host of other challenges of the early 20th century that we do not worry about today. One challenge that residents of Galveston, Houston, and the surrounding area did not have to face was water. Water was already distributed throughout the area, underground, in what is today referred to as the Gulf Coast Aquifer System. It was only necessary to drill a shallow well and clean groundwater would flow from the well, even without a pump to withdraw it. Water was abundant. Today, in the early 21st century, we have air conditioners that counteract the heat and humidity of the summer months, government trucks that spray pesticides to greatly reduce the mosquito population, and for whatever reasons the alligators don’t seem to roam the streets of downtown Houston as they once did. Oh, how the times have changed. As the population grew throughout the last century and industries blossomed, the demand for water increased greatly. Unlike 100 years ago, one of our greatest challenges today is our water supply. You can’t just drill a shallow well today in your backyard anymore and expect clean, fresh water to come bubbling up. In today’s greater Houston area, groundwater still is utilized by many people, but surface water is the predominant supply. -
Houston, Texas 1973-87
NOMTechnical Report NOS 131 NGS 44 Subsidence at Houston, Texas 1973-87 Sandford R. Holdahl Joseph C. Holzschuh David B. Zilkoski Rockville, MD August 1989 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Chatting and Geodetic Services NOAA TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS National Ocean Service/National Geodetic Survey Subseries The National Geodetic Survey (NGS), Office of Charting and Geodetic Services, the National Ocean Service (NOS), NOM, establishes and maintains the basic national horizontal, vertical, and gravity networks of geodetic control, and provides Government-wide leadership in the improvement of geodetic surveying methods and instrumentation, coordinates operations to assure network development, and provides specifications and criteria for survey operations by Federal, State, and other agencies. NGS engages in research and development for the improvement of knowledge of the figure of the Earth and its gravity field, and has the responsibility to procure geodetic data from all sources, process these data, and make them generally available to users through a central data base. NOAA geodetic publications and relevant geodetic publications of the former U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey are sold in paper form by the National Geodetic Information Branch. To obtain a price list or to place an order, contact: National Geodetic Information Branch (N/CG174) Charting and Geodetic Services National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Rockville, MD 20852 Telephone: 1 301 443 8631 When placing an order, make check or money order payable to: National Geodetic Survey. Do not send cash or stamps. Publications can be charged to Visa or Master Card, or purchased over the counter at the National Geodetic Information Branch, 11400 Rockville Pike, Room 24, Rockville, MD. -
D R a F T Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Baytown
D R A F T MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN May 08, 2014 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in a Regular Meeting on Thursday, May 08, 2014, at 6:30 P.M. in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall, 2401 Market Street, Baytown, Texas with the following in attendance: Brandon Capetillo Council Member Robert Hoskins Council Member Chris Presley Council Member Mercedes Renteria Council Member Terry Sain Council Member David McCartney Mayor Pro Tem Robert D. Leiper City Manager Ron Bottoms Deputy City Manager Kevin Troller Assistant City Manager Ignacio Ramirez City Attorney Leticia Brysch City Clerk Keith Dougherty Sergeant at Arms Mayor Pro Tem McCartney convened the May 08, 2014, City Council Regular Meeting with a quorum present at 6:30 P.M., all members were present with the exception of Mayor Stephen DonCarlos who was absent. Pledge of Allegiance, Texas Pledge, and Invocation was led by Council Member Capetillo. 1. MINUTES a. Consider approving the minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting held on April 10, 2014. A motion was made by Council Member Robert C. Hoskins and seconded by Council Member Brandon Capetillo approving the April 10, 2014, City Council Regular Meeting minutes. The vote was as follows: Ayes: Council Member Brandon Capetillo, Council Member Robert C. Hoskins, Mayor Pro Tem David McCartney, Council Member Mercedes Renteria III, Council Member Terry Sain, Council Member Chris Presley Nays: None City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 08, 2014 Page 2 of 20 Other: Mayor Stephen DonCarlos (Absent) Approved 2. -
Guide to the American Petroleum Institute Photograph and Film Collection, 1860S-1980S
Guide to the American Petroleum Institute Photograph and Film Collection, 1860s-1980s NMAH.AC.0711 Bob Ageton (volunteer) and Kelly Gaberlavage (intern), August 2004 and May 2006; supervised by Alison L. Oswald, archivist. August 2004 and May 2006 Archives Center, National Museum of American History P.O. Box 37012 Suite 1100, MRC 601 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 4 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 6 Series 1: Historical Photographs, 1850s-1950s....................................................... 6 Series 2: Modern Photographs, 1960s-1980s........................................................ 75 Series 3: Miscellaneous -
Download Port
Crystal Bay Marina South Old River Central Crystal Bay Cement Cemex Greens Bayou 1 & 2 Cement Old River South Crossover Central Goose Creek Cement Baytown Industrial Houston Cemex Buffalo Bayou Greens Bayou 1 & 2 Highlines Terminal Houston Bulk Fuel Oil 4 Cement Fred Hartman Bridge East and West Jacintoport 2 1 & Red Light Bend Terminal 3 5 3 3 Clearance 175 feet Turning Basin Greensport Terminal Kavanagh 4 Vulcan 2 8/9 Jacintoport 1 Crossover 5 2 Battleship 3+4 Inbesa 1 Texas East Industrial 3 2 Houston Public Wharves West 5 Morgan’s Point Crystal Bay Buffalo Bayou Terminal 7 8 4 4 Houston Bulk Scott Bay Fuel Oil (City Docks) Magellan 8 Cargill Vopak Highlines 9 East and West 1 Jacintoport 2 1 North Side Targa 3 Terminal 3 5 Hog Island 1 & 2 BP 7 3 3 Clearance 197 feet 8 thru 32 1-2-4-5Turning Basin Junkyard Greensport Terminal2 Kavanagh I.T.C. 4 6 Enterprise (4-8) 1 G+H Vulcan 2 1 2 Jacintoport 1 Crystal Bay Mooring8/9 1 3 5 Public Wharves Boat Dock Stolthaven (2-3) 5 2 BattleshipOld River 7 Crystal Bay 1 (City Docks) 2 4 6 3+4 Mooring South Inbesa Texas 4 North Chevron East Santa Anna 3 2 Westway 2 Public Wharves 2 3 8 West 5 Exxon Refinery South Side 9 Boat Dock Central 7 8 5 Agrifos Agrifos Phillips Terminal 5 Bayou 4 Scott Bay (City Docks) Cement Est. 1985 • ISO Certified Cargill 1 thru 4 Load Rock 1 Magellan 9 8 1 VopakCemex North Side Georgia Targa 1 & 2 Old River 3 1 & 2 South 7 Greens Bayou 6 Crystal Bay Port Public Wharves Central BP Old River 2 2 Cement Barbours Cut 8 thru 32 Gulf Dock 1-2-4-5 Junkyard 5 I.T.C. -
BERNAL-THESIS-2020.Pdf (5.477Mb)
BROWNWOOD: BAYTOWN’S MOST HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD by Laura Bernal A thesis submitted to the History Department, College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History Chair of Committee: Dr. Monica Perales Committee Member: Dr. Mark Goldberg Committee Member: Dr. Kristin Wintersteen University of Houston May 2020 Copyright 2020, Laura Bernal “A land without ruins is a land without memories – a land without memories is a land without history.” -Father Abram Joseph Ryan, “A Land Without Ruins” iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, and foremost, I want to thank God for guiding me on this journey. Thank you to my family for their unwavering support, especially to my parents and sisters. Thank you for listening to me every time I needed to work out an idea and for staying up late with me as I worked on this project. More importantly, thank you for accompanying me to the Baytown Nature Center hoping to find more house foundations. I am very grateful to the professors who helped me. Dr. Monica Perales, my advisor, thank you for your patience and your guidance as I worked on this project. Thank you to my defense committee, Dr. Kristin Wintersteen and Dr. Goldberg. Your advice helped make this my best work. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. Debbie Harwell, who encouraged me to pursue this project, even when I doubted it its impact. Thank you to the friends and co-workers who listened to my opinions and encouraged me to not give up. Lastly, I would like to thank the people I interviewed. -
Houston-Galveston, Texas Managing Coastal Subsidence
HOUSTON-GALVESTON, TEXAS Managing coastal subsidence TEXAS he greater Houston area, possibly more than any other Lake Livingston A N D S metropolitan area in the United States, has been adversely U P L L affected by land subsidence. Extensive subsidence, caused T A S T A mainly by ground-water pumping but also by oil and gas extraction, O C T r has increased the frequency of flooding, caused extensive damage to Subsidence study area i n i t y industrial and transportation infrastructure, motivated major in- R i v vestments in levees, reservoirs, and surface-water distribution facili- e S r D N ties, and caused substantial loss of wetland habitat. Lake Houston A L W O Although regional land subsidence is often subtle and difficult to L detect, there are localities in and near Houston where the effects are Houston quite evident. In this low-lying coastal environment, as much as 10 L Galveston feet of subsidence has shifted the position of the coastline and A Bay T changed the distribution of wetlands and aquatic vegetation. In fact, S A Texas City the San Jacinto Battleground State Historical Park, site of the battle O Galveston that won Texas independence, is now partly submerged. This park, C Gulf of Mexico about 20 miles east of downtown Houston on the shores of Galveston Bay, commemorates the April 21, 1836, victory of Texans 0 20 Miles led by Sam Houston over Mexican forces led by Santa Ana. About 0 20 Kilometers 100 acres of the park are now under water due to subsidence, and A road (below right) that provided access to the San Jacinto Monument was closed due to flood- ing caused by subsidence. -
Beach and Bay Access Guide
Texas Beach & Bay Access Guide Second Edition Texas General Land Office Jerry Patterson, Commissioner The Texas Gulf Coast The Texas Gulf Coast consists of cordgrass marshes, which support a rich array of marine life and provide wintering grounds for birds, and scattered coastal tallgrass and mid-grass prairies. The annual rainfall for the Texas Coast ranges from 25 to 55 inches and supports morning glories, sea ox-eyes, and beach evening primroses. Click on a region of the Texas coast The Texas General Land Office makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information depicted on these maps, or the data from which it was produced. These maps are NOT suitable for navigational purposes and do not purport to depict or establish boundaries between private and public land. Contents I. Introduction 1 II. How to Use This Guide 3 III. Beach and Bay Public Access Sites A. Southeast Texas 7 (Jefferson and Orange Counties) 1. Map 2. Area information 3. Activities/Facilities B. Houston-Galveston (Brazoria, Chambers, Galveston, Harris, and Matagorda Counties) 21 1. Map 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities C. Golden Crescent (Calhoun, Jackson and Victoria Counties) 1. Map 79 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities D. Coastal Bend (Aransas, Kenedy, Kleberg, Nueces, Refugio and San Patricio Counties) 1. Map 96 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities E. Lower Rio Grande Valley (Cameron and Willacy Counties) 1. Map 2. Area Information 128 3. Activities/Facilities IV. National Wildlife Refuges V. Wildlife Management Areas VI. Chambers of Commerce and Visitor Centers 139 143 147 Introduction It’s no wonder that coastal communities are the most densely populated and fastest growing areas in the country. -
Baytown Mobility Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
BAYTOWN MOBILITY PLAN u Adopted January 24, 2013 City of Baytown Baytown Mobility Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City Council – Mayor, Stephen H. DonCarlos 2011 Members District 1 – Mercedes Renteria III Barry Bobbitt District 2 – Scott Sheley Brandon Benoit District 3 – Brandon Capetillo Gil Chambers District 4 – Terry Sain Dr. Joe C. Floyd District 5 – Robert C. Hoskins Jim Hutchison District 6 – David McCartney Mary Flores Planning & Zoning Commission Rolando Valdez Tracey Wheeler 2012 Members Spencer Carnes Brandon Benoit City Staff R.D. Burnside Administration Spencer Carnes Bob Leiper, City Manager Gilbert Chambers Ron Bottoms, Deputy City Manager James E. “Bo” Cox Kevin Troller, Assistant City Manager Lisa D. Clary Dr. Joe C. Floyd Planning & Development Services Kelly Carpenter, AICP, Director of Planning and Development Shawn McDonald Services Tracey Wheeler Tiffany Foster, AICP, Assistant Director Andrew Allemand, AICP, Development Review Manager Page – i City of Baytown Baytown Mobility Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................ i 6.5 Conclusions ............................................................................... 6-10 LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................... iv CHAPTER 7. MULTI-MODAL ASSESSMENT ............................................. 7-1 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1-1 7.1 Introduction ............................................................................... -
Mid-Bay Gate
Mid-bay gate (M) Oyster reefs (D) SSPEED models showed that a mid- SSPEED evaluated the storm-surge bay gate, if used in combination protection that would result from the with dredged containment berms proposed construction of oyster reefs (E), would provide substantial surge across the middle of Galveston Bay, reduction in the western and upper along with vertical retaining walls. portions of the bay. Preliminary Modeling for this scenario found that estimates indicate the mid-bay gate the reefs alone would not adequately would provide a significant level of reduce storm surge in the western and surge protection for the west side of northwestern portions of the bay in Galveston Bay and the industrial the event that hurricane-force winds complex along the Houston Ship crossed over the large open expanse Channel. in the upper portion of the bay. Dredged berms (E) Galveston Seawall (1) The proposed dredge-containment Raising the existing 17-foot berms along the Houston Ship Galveston Seawall would provide Channel within the bay have been additional protection from coastal evaluated with computer models. storm surge for the city of Galveston. Existing berm sites along much of SSPEED has evaluated this scenario the Houston Ship Channel have and assessed the level of surge been constructed by the Army Corps protection a raised seawall would of Engineers for depositing the provide. material that is routinely dredged from the ship channel. Some of Raising Texas Highway 87 (F) and these berms, like the one that makes Farm-to-Market Road 3005 (G) up Atkinson Island, are as high as Computer models showed that raising 25 feet above sea level. -
Subsidence at Houston, Texas 1973-87
NOAA Technical Report NOS 131 NGS 44 Subsidence at Houston, Texas 1973-87 Sandford R. Holdahl Joseph C. Holzschuh David B. Zilkoski Rockville, MD August 1989 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Charting and Geodetic Services NOAA TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS National Ocean Service/National Geodetic Survey Subseries The National Geodetic Survey (NGS), Office of Charting and Geodetic Services, the National Ocean Service (NOS), NOAA, establishes and maintains the basic national horizontal, vertical, and gravity networks of geodetic control, and provides Govermnent-wide leadership in the improvement of geodetic surveying methods and instrumentation, coordinates operations to assure network development, and provides specifications and criteria for survey operations by Federal, State, and other agencies. NGS engages in research and development for the improvement of knowledge of the figure of the Earth and its gravity field, and has the responsibility to procure geodetic data from all sources, process these data, and make them generally available to users through a central data base. NOAA geodetic publications and relevant geodetic publications of the former U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey are sold in paper form by the National Geodetic Information Branch. To obtain a price list or to place an order, contact: National Geodetic Information Branch (N/CG174) Charting and Geodetic Services National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Rockville, MD 20852 Telephone: 1 301 443 8631 When placing an order, make check or money order payable to: National Geodetic Survey. Do not send cash or stamps. Publications can be charged to Visa or Master Card, or purchased over the counter at the National Geodetic Information Branch, 11400 Rockville Pike, Room 24, Rockville, MD. -
Atlas Smelting and Refining 5 Houston, Harris County NFA 02/16/2009 7 Years Between
Atlas Smelting and Refining 5 Houston, Harris County NFA 02/16/2009 7 years between The site is located west of interstate Hwy 45 in the Houston Heights neighborhood, located north of downtown Houston, inside loop 610. The surrounding land use is residential. A Pre-Cerclis Check List was prepared for the site in March 2002. The Pre-Cerclis Report noted that the site posed a Low Potential Hazard. The Report further noted that the site was found to be inactive, and the two buildings comprising the site had signs that said “FOR LEASE.” It also noted that the previous site activities were unknown. No file information was available from the EPA or the TCEQ regarding the site operational history. A TCEQ representative visited the site on January 22, 2009. The representative observed that the old buildings had been demolished and removed from the site; and the site was currently occupied by two-story residences. The TCEQ representative also spoke to Mr. Matt Christianson, representative of Sullivan Interests (Luxury Home Builder) during the site visit. According to Mr. Christianson, the company is a real estate developer. The company purchased the site in 2006, and the adjacent Iron and Metal site in 2004. These two businesses are located in a residential neighborhood. The company removed the existing structures and built high end homes, which the company sold to individuals. Mr. Christianson further stated that the site was inactive at the time his company purchased the site; and the two on-site buildings were housing the parts painting equipment. The Company stated to TCEQ that the company did not notice any evidence that would indicate smelting operations were taking place in the buildings that were removed.