DOCSLIB.ORG

III. Treatment Given to Nana Saheb

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
III. Treatment Given to Nana Saheb Introduction Causes of the First War of Independence Political and Socio-Religious Causes Introduction Reason for the Resentment Against the British Rule Process of Consolidati the British on of the conquest of British Rule India Causes of the First War of Independence ❖ British established their domination over India between 1757 to 1857. ❖ This was possible through British conquest and rapid expansion. ❖ British expansionist policies, economic exploitation and administrative changes adversely affected all segments of Indian society. ❖ Ruling classes removed from their power. ❖ Peasantry was deprived of its la land rights. ❖ Artisans lost their livelihood. ❖ Well paid higher posts were reserved for British soldiers. ❖ Priests and scholars found themselves without income in the absence of Indian rulers. ❖ Indian soldiers with the company had a hard life due to their low income and also faced ill-treatment. ❖ Hence, by 1857 conditions were ripe for mass uprising. ❖ All these lead to the First war of Indian Independence. Political Causes I. Policy of Expansion 1. By Outright Wars 2. By Subsidiary Alliance 3. By using the Doctrine of Lapse 4. On the pretext of Alleged Misrule 1. By Outright Wars ● Battle of Buxar (1764) - Bengal, Bihar and Odisha. ● Anglo-Mysore Wars (1767 to 1799) - Mysore State. ● Third Anglo-Maratha War (1817-18) - North and South of the Narmada river (Peshwa’s domination) ● Second Anglo Sikh War (1823 - 1856) - Punjab ● Further Expansion - Sindh, Assam, Arkana and Tenasserim and Pegu in Myanmar. 2. By Subsidiary Alliance ● Introduced by Lord Wellesley. ● An agreement between the British East India Company and the Princely States by virtue of which these states lost their sovereignty to the British. Indian Rulers had to; ❖ accept the British as the supreme power. ❖ surrender their foreign relations. ❖ accept a British resident at their headquarters. ❖ agreed to maintain British troops at their own cost. ❖ virtually lost their independence. By 1856, practically all the Indian states had either been annexed or had entered into alliances with the Company. 3. By using the Doctrine of Lapse ❏ If any Indian ruler died without a male heir his kingdom would ‘lapse’ that is it would come under the company’s Rule. ❏ 1856: The ruler of Jhansi died without an heir. So, Rani of Jhansi was pensioned and their adopted son, Anand Rao was not recognised as a lawful successor. ❏ Other States which annexed by applying this policy were Satara, Jaitpur, Sambalpur, Udaipur and Nagpur. 4. On the Pretext of Alleged Misrule ❏ 1856: Lord Dalhousie annexed Awadh. ❏ Declared Awadh was being misruled and British rule was needed to ensure proper administration. ❏ But, people of Awadh had faced many hardships which made them join the Revolt of 1857. II. Disrespect shown to Bahadur Shah 1. Name of 3. His 5. Hence, his the Mughal successors wife, Zeenat King were not Mahal began removed allowed to plotting from the use imperial against the coins. titles. British. 2. His Successors 4. Hurt the were not feelings of permitted to the Muslims. use Red Fort. III. Treatment Given to Nana Saheb 5. Travelled from Delhi to 1. Adopted 3. Forced to Lucknow to son of Baji leave gain support, Rao II. Kanpur. but did not succeed. 2. British 4. Widely refused to resented in grant him the the Maratha pension. region. IV. Absentee Sovereignty of the British Compare and Contrast Mughal Rule in India British Rule in India 1. Mughals who conquered Ruled by British India, in course of time government at a distance of settled in India. a thousand miles. 2. Revenue collected from India’s wealth was being India was spent in India drained to England and not only. utilised for their welfare. Socio-Religious Causes 1. Interference with Social Customs 3. Opening 1. Abolition of Western of Sati education (1829) to Girls. 2. Widow Remarriage Act (1856) 2. Apprehensions about Modern Innovation ❖ People were suspicious of the introduction of modern innovations such as railways and telegraphs. ❖ Orthodox Indians did not like sitting arrangements in the railway compartments (Both higher caste and lower caste were made to sit together). ❖ They believed that the British had made such arrangements to defy their caste and religion. 3. Corruption in Administration ● Police and petty officials were corrupt. ● Common man was looted, oppressed and tortured. 4. Oppression of the Poor ● The judicial system was complex. ● Flogging, torture and imprisonment of cultivators were common due to their inability to pay land revenue, arrears on rent and interest on debt. 5. Policy of Racial Discrimination ● Rude and arrogant towards Indians. ● They believe that they were superior to Indians. ● Followed the policy of contempt towards the Indians. ● Dubbed Muslims as cruel and unfaithful. ● Illtreated and insulted Indians. 6. Activities of Missionaries ● Denounced idol worship and dubbed local beliefs as ignorance. ● After 1813: Activities of Christian missionaries increased that feared Indians. 7. Law of Property ● The Religious Disabilities Act changed the Hindu Law Property. ● It enabled a convert from Hinduism to other religious faiths. 8. Fears Regarding Western Education Shifting of emphasis from oriental learning to western education was doubted. Pandits and Maulvis saw this as a attempt to discourage traditional learning. Thy believed that western education started to convert their children to christianity. 9. Taxing Religious Places Such lands were 1. It hurt the religious exempted from taxation sentiments of the Indians. by previous Indian Rulers. The families which depended on this places did not like this. Homework Question 1. Who was Anand Rao? A. Son of Rani Laxmi Bai B. Son of Baji Rao II C. Ruler of Punjab D. Ruler of Kanpur [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JIWAJI University Gwalior(MP)New1
    JIWAJI University Gwalior(MP) MA History second semester Paper Title – History Of Maratha (1627 - 1761) Course Code – 204 Unit - 5 Balaji Bajirao and Third Battle Of Panipat Date – 06/04/2020 Sanjay Mohan Balaji Baji Rao Balaji Bajirao Peshwa (December 8, 1720 – June 23, 1761), also known as Nana Saheb, was a Peshwa (prime minister) of the Maratha Empire in India. He was appointed as Peshwa in 1740 upon the death of his illustrious father, the Peshwa Bajirao I. During his tenure, the Chhatrapati (Maratha king) was reduced to a mere figurehead. At the same time, the Maratha empire started transforming into a confederacy, in which individual chiefs — such as the Holkars, the Scindias and the Bhonsles of Nagpur kingdom — became more powerful. During Balaji Rao's tenure, the Maratha territory reached its zenith. A large part of this expansion, however, was led by the individual chiefs of the Maratha Empire. By the end of Balaji Baji Rao's tenure, the Peshwa was reduced to more of a financier than a general. Unlike his father, Balaji Baji Rao was not a great military leader and failed to gauge the seriousness of Durrani invasions in northern India. This ultimately resulted in a devastating Maratha defeat at the Third Battle of Panipat.[3] Some judicial and revenue reforms were made during his tenure, but the credit for these goes to his cousin Sadashivrao Bhau and his associate Balshastri Gadgil. THIRD BATTLE OF PANIPAT(1761) The Third Battle of Panipat took place on 14 January 1761, at Panipat, about 60 miles (95.5 km) north of Delhi between a northern expeditionary force of the Maratha Empire and a coalition of the King of Afghanistan, Ahmad Shah Durrani with two Indian Muslim allies—the Rohilla Afghans of the Doab, and Shuja-ud-Daula, the Nawab of Oudh.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Maratha History: Indian Sources
    1 SOURCES OF MARATHA HISTORY: INDIAN SOURCES Unit Structure : 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Maratha Sources 1.3 Sanskrit Sources 1.4 Hindi Sources 1.5 Persian Sources 1.6 Summary 1.7 Additional Readings 1.8 Questions 1.0 OBJECTIVES After the completion of study of this unit the student will be able to:- 1. Understand the Marathi sources of the history of Marathas. 2. Explain the matter written in all Bakhars ranging from Sabhasad Bakhar to Tanjore Bakhar. 3. Know Shakavalies as a source of Maratha history. 4. Comprehend official files and diaries as source of Maratha history. 5. Understand the Sanskrit sources of the Maratha history. 6. Explain the Hindi sources of Maratha history. 7. Know the Persian sources of Maratha history. 1.1 INTRODUCTION The history of Marathas can be best studied with the help of first hand source material like Bakhars, State papers, court Histories, Chronicles and accounts of contemporary travelers, who came to India and made observations of Maharashtra during the period of Marathas. The Maratha scholars and historians had worked hard to construct the history of the land and people of Maharashtra. Among such scholars people like Kashinath Sane, Rajwade, Khare and Parasnis were well known luminaries in this field of history writing of Maratha. Kashinath Sane published a mass of original material like Bakhars, Sanads, letters and other state papers in his journal Kavyetihas Samgraha for more eleven years during the nineteenth century. There is much more them contribution of the Bharat Itihas Sanshodhan Mandal, Pune to this regard.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Energy Education Society Study Material Class-VIII Subject- History Lesson 05-When People Rebel: 1857 and After Module
    Atomic Energy Education Society Study material Class-VIII Subject- History Lesson 05-When People Rebel: 1857 and After Module- 2/2 Important points The Rebellion Spreads : The British had initially taken the revolt at Meerut quite lightly. But the decision by Bahadur Shah Zafar to support the rebellion had dramatically changed the entire situation. People were emboldened by an alternative possibility. The British were routed from Delhi, and for almost a week there was no uprising. The rebellion in Delhi took almost a week to spread as news over whole of the India. Many regiments mutinied one after another at various places such as Delhi, Kanpur and Lucknow. People of the towns and the villages also rose up in rebellion and rallied around local leaders. Zamindars and chiefs were prepared to establish their authority and fight the British. Nanasaheb Peshwa gathered armed forces and expelled the British garrison in Kanpur. He proclaimed himself the Peshwa. He declared that he was a governor under Emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar. Birjis Qadr, the son of Nawab Wajid Ali shah, was proclaimed the new Nawab. He too acknowledged suzerainty of Bahadur Shah Zafar. Begum Hazrat Mahal took an active part in organizing the uprising against the British. In Jhansi, Rani Lakshmibai joined the rebel Sepoys and fought the British along with Tantia Tope. The General of Nana Saheb. Ahmadullah Shah a maulvi from Faizabad prophesied that the rule of the British would come to an end he caught the imagination of the people and raised a huge force of supporters. He came to Lucknow to fight the Britishers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Keys to British Success in South Asia COLIN WATTERSON
    The Keys to British Success in South Asia COLIN WATTERSON “God is on everyone’s side…and in the last analysis he is on the side with plenty of money and large armies” -Jean Anouilh For a period of a period of over one hundred years, the British directly controlled the subcontinent of India. How did a small island nation come on the Edge of the North Atlantic come to dominate a much larger landmass and population located almost 4000 miles away? Historian Sir John Robert Seeley wrote that the British Empire was acquired in “a fit of absence of mind” to show that the Empire was acquired gradually, piece-by-piece. This will paper will try to examine some of the most important reasons which allowed the British to successfully acquire and hold each “piece” of India. This paper will examine the conditions that were present in India before the British arrived—a crumbling central political power, fierce competition from European rivals, and Mughal neglect towards certain portions of Indian society—were important factors in British control. Economic superiority was an also important control used by the British—this paper will emphasize the way trade agreements made between the British and Indians worked to favor the British. Military force was also an important factor but this paper will show that overwhelming British force was not the reason the British military was successful—Britain’s powerful navy, ability to play Indian factions against one another, and its use of native soldiers were keys to military success. Political Agendas and Indian Historical Approaches The historiography of India has gone through four major phases—three of which have been driven by the prevailing world politics of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Maratha War Anglo- Sikh War British Policies
    Anglo-Maratha War Anglo- Sikh War British Policies Modern History: Module IV - British Expansion The Rise and Fall of the Maratha Power Modern Indian History Modern History: Module IV - British Expansion Marathas q Most important challenger to the decaying Mughal power. q Number of brilliant commanders q Lacked unity q Lacked the outlook & programme which were necessary for founding a pan-India empire. q They did however succeed in waging continuous war against the Mughal Empire, till they destroyed it. Modern History: Module IV - British Expansion Evolution of Peshwaship q Shahuji, grandson of Chattrapati Shivaji, had been a prisoner of Aurangzeb since 1689. q Released in 1707 q Soon, a civil war broke out between Shahuji (Satara) & his aunt Tara Bai (Kolhapur), who had carried out an anti-Mughal struggle since 1700 in the name of her son Shivaji II after the death of her husband Raja Ram. Modern History: Module IV - British Expansion Evolution of Peshwaship Continued… q Arising out of the conflict between Shahuji & his rival, a new system of Maratha government was evolved under the leadership of Balaji Vishwanath, the Peshwa of King Shahuji. (1713) q With this change began the period of Peshwa domination in Maratha history in which the Maratha state was transformed into an empire. q He & his son Baji Rao I made the Peshwa the functional head of the Marathas. Modern History: Module IV - British Expansion Balaji Vishwanath (1713-1720 C.E.) q Balaji Vishwanath, a Brahmin, started his career as a small revenue official. He played a crucial role in the victory of Sahu over Tarabai in the Battle of Khed in 1707 C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • CC-12:HISTORY of INDIA(1750S-1857) II.EXPANSION and CONSOLIDATION of COLONIAL POWER
    CC-12:HISTORY OF INDIA(1750s-1857) II.EXPANSION AND CONSOLIDATION OF COLONIAL POWER: (A) MERCANTILISM,FOREIGN TRADE AND EARLY FORMS OF EXTRACTION FROM BENGAL The coming of the Europeans to the Indian subcontinent was an event of great significance as it ultimately led to revolutionary changes in its destiny in the future. Europe’s interest in India goes back to the ancient times when lucrative trade was carried on between India and Europe. India was rich in terms of spices, textile and other oriental products which had huge demand in the large consumer markets in the west. Since the ancient time till the medieval period, spices formed an important part of European trade with India. Pepper, ginger, chillies, cinnamon and cloves were carried to Europe where they fetched high prices. Indian silk, fine Muslin and Indian cotton too were much in demand among rich European families. Pearls and other precious stone also found high demand among the European elites. Trade was conducted both by sea and by land. While the sea routes opened from the ports of the western coast of India and went westward through the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea to Alexandria and Constantinople, Indian trade goods found their way across the Mediterranean to the commercials hubs of Venice and Genoa, from where they were then dispersed throughout the main cities of Europe. The old trading routes between the east and the west came under Turkish control after the Ottoman conquest of Asia Minor and the capture of Constantinople in1453.The merchants of Venice and Genoa monopolised the trade between Europe and Asia and refused to let the new nation states of Western Europe, particularly Spain and Portugal, have any share in the trade through these old routes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Anglo-Maratha War
    The Third Anglo-Maratha War There were three Anglo-Maratha wars (or Maratha Wars) fought between the late 18th century and the beginning of the 19th century between the British and the Marathas. In the end, the Maratha power was destroyed and British supremacy established. Third Anglo-Maratha War (1817 – 1818) Background and course • After the second Anglo-Maratha war, the Marathas made one last attempt to rebuild their old prestige. • They wanted to retake all their old possessions from the English. • They were also unhappy with the British residents’ interference in their internal matters. • The chief reason for this war was the British conflict with the Pindaris whom the British suspected were being protected by the Marathas. • The Maratha chiefs Peshwa Bajirao II, Malharrao Holkar and Mudhoji II Bhonsle forged a united front against the English. • Daulatrao Shinde, the fourth major Maratha chief was pressured diplomatically to stay away. • But the British victory was swift. Results • The Treaty of Gwalior was signed in 1817 between Shinde and the British, even though he had not been involved in the war. As per this treaty, Shinde gave up Rajasthan to the British. The Rajas of Rajputana remained the Princely States till 1947 after accepting British sovereignty. • The Treaty of Mandasor was signed between the British and the Holkar chief in 1818. An infant was placed on the throne under British guardianship. • The Peshwa surrendered in 1818. He was dethroned and pensioned off to a small estate in Bithur (near Kanpur). Most parts of his territory became part of the Bombay Presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • Note on Misleading and Factual Misrepresentation of the Current NCERT Textbooks: a Response to the Public Notice Issued by the Rajya Sabha Secretariat
    INDIAN HISTORY CONGRESS (Established, 1935) Note on Misleading and Factual Misrepresentation of the Current NCERT Textbooks: A Response to the Public Notice Issued by the Rajya Sabha Secretariat In a recent communication the Rajya Sabha Secretariat has called for ‘Reforms in the contents and designs of Text Books with focus on: a. removing references to un-historical facts and distortions about our national heroes from the text books b. ensuring equal or proportionate references to all periods of Indian history c. highlighting the role of great historic women heroes, including Gargi, Maitreyi, or rulers like Rani of Jhansi, Rani Channamma, Chand Bibi, Zhalkari Bai etc. While History itself is a discipline having its own internal dynamic and gets enriched by continuous research and rigorous debate and discussions within the scholarly domain, the Indian History Congress has examined the claims in the aforementioned notice in the light of the contents of the existing NCERT textbooks. A completely factual examination of the textbooks, with details presented in tabular form below, based on the points mentioned above, however, suggests that the call for the reform of textbooks is not based on any academic, pedagogic or factual detail. The table below presents the references to primary sources, proportionate representations to all periods of history, national heroes, and historical female figures in the NCERT textbooks of Classes VI to XII currently in use in the country. Textbook Primary Source References* References to Proportionate National Heroes** Great Historic Representation (Period/ Women Figures Region/ Language/ Traditions) Class VI Pp. 4-6, 13, 18, 19, 26, 27, 29, P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indian Revolt of 1857 : Global Response
    No. 263 December 2020 Major General (Dr.) RS Thakur, is presently commanding the Uttarakhand The Indian Revolt of Sub Area. He was commissioned into the Air Defence Regiment and has done 1857 : Global PhD in History from Jammu University. He is an alumni of the National Defence College and the College of Defence Response Management. During his tenure as Director ‘Space’ with Directorate General of Perspective Planning, he wrote articles on Space Applications. Introduction Key Points • The bulk of the writings on the Indian Revolt of 1857 by British authors were The second half of the nineteenth century guided by their own political and witnessed struggles in different parts of the globe imperial motivations, with an aim to project their racial superiority as well by the people of native colonies against their rulers as heroism of their citizens against the Indian rebels. to gain freedom. While the British Empire was at • The revolt saw the exceptional its peak and had the maximum footprint across leadership of four most prominent military leaders, namely Nana Sahib, various continents, others such as the French, Rani Lakshmi Bai, Begum Hazrat Mahal and Kunwar Singh —whose Spanish and Dutch empires were on the decline. combined efforts ensured that the The Indian Revolt of 1857 (also known as the fight continued for almost two years in spite of innumerable odds stacked Sepoy Mutiny) was one such landmark struggle, against them. • which not only shook the British Empire to its While the domestic aspect of the Indian Revolt of 1857 has been foundation, but also evoked huge response from adequately covered and written about in the Indian academic landscape, not the world over.
    [Show full text]
  • HI234: Introduction to India and South Asia
    Professor Benjamin R. Siegel Lecture, Fall 2016: History Department, Boston University Tu / Th, 12:30 – 2:00, KCB 104 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Tu / Th 10:30 – noon Office phone: 617-353-8316 226 Bay State Road, Room 205 HI234: Introduction to India and South Asia Map of British India, c. 1909 Map of South Asia, c. 1950 Course Description It is easy to think of the Indian subcontinent, home of nearly 1.7 billion people, as a region only now moving into the global limelight, propelled by remarkable growth against a backdrop of enduring poverty, and dramatic contestations over civil society. Yet since antiquity, South Asia has been one of the world’s most dynamic crossroads, a place where cultures met and exchanged ideas, goods, and populations. The region was the site of the most prolonged and intensive colonial encounter in the form of Britain’s Indian empire, and Indian individuals and ideas entered into long conversations with counterparts in Europe, the Middle East, East and Southeast Asia, and elsewhere. Since India’s independence and partition into two countries in 1947, the region has struggled to overcome poverty, disease, ethnic strife and political conflict. Its three major countries – India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh – have undertaken three distinct experiments in democracy with three radically divergent outcomes. Those countries’ large, important diaspora populations and others have played important roles in these nation’s development, even as the larger world grows more aware of how important South Asia remains, and will become. Benjamin Siegel – HI234: Introduction to India and South Asia This course is a survey of South Asian history from antiquity to the present, focusing on the ideas, encounters, and exchanges that have formed this dynamic region.
    [Show full text]
  • DAY 20 ADVENT of EUROPEANS.Indd
    20 PRELIMS 2021 120 DAYS PLANNER QUICK REVISION MODULE - 2 HISTORY Advent of Europeans ADVENT OF EUROPEANS Introduction But, the new sea route via the Cape of Good Hope was discovered by Vasco da Gama in 1498 and thereafter, many trading companies came to India and established their trading centres.The British East India Company was a Joint- Stock Company established in 1600, as the Company of Merchants of London Trading into the East Indies. During this time, other trading companies, established by the Portuguese, Dutch, French, and Danish were similarly expanding in the region. The British Company gained footing in India in 1612 after Mughal emperor Jahangir granted the rights to establish a factory (a trading post) in Surat to Sir Thomas Roe, a representative diplomat of Queen Elizabeth Ist of England. The factors responsible for advent of European powers in India were: Immense wealth of India Heavy demand for Indian commodities like spices, calicoes, silk, various precious stones, porcelain, etc European advancement in the fi eld of ship building and navigation in the 15th century. The Portuguese Pedro Alvarez Cabral arrived in 1500 and Vasco da Gama also made a second trip in 1502. They established trading stations at Calicut, Cannanore and Cochin. Later in 1509 Albuquerque was made the governor of the Portuguese territories in India. He introduced “the policy of imperialism”. In 1510, he captured Goa from the ruler of Bijapur. Thereafter, Goa became the capital of the Portuguese settlements in India. The successors of Albuquerque established Portuguese settlements at Daman, Salsette and Bombay on the west coast and at Santhome near Madras and Hugli in Bengal on the east coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Rani of Jhansi
    The RANI OF JHANSI A Historical Play in four acts by PHILIP COX This is a reconstruction in dramatic form of the intensely moving story of the tragic young Hindu Princess, who was fated to take up arms against the British during the Indian Mutiny of 1857. There are 2 female and 12 male speaking parts, besides a crowd. The play is in eleven episodes and requires five sets of scenery. /--- - "" or not this arresting figure of a royal widow in revolt "'to Joan of Arc, her claim upon our notice is indis­ f?'·•e of the tribute paid to her by her chief military ·'" \. British side: "She was the best and bravest of ! /portrait has already secured some striking com· : George Bernard Shaw, who generously perused ~ the original :\IS., has said: "The Rani of Jhansi ..... .~ performed at an Indian Kational Theatre, as soon "' t'!iey :tave one." l\lr. William Armstrong of the Liverpool : e ~·<:rtory Theatre has stated: "You have written a most interest­ ,; ,. ;•l.,y and I enjoytd reading it very much. Sincere, dramatic, 1 • ,I cunstructtd and moYing." :\Ir. Ronald Ad.;~ms of the '1-ssy TLeatre, London, made this comment after reading the script: "This is a magnificent effurt." I :\DO~: GEORGE ALLEN (j UNWIN LTD The author has brought to this very fasci­ nating study of events and motives in a bygone age, the knowledge of a specialist supported by a varied general experience as advocate, administrator and educationist. During recent years his courses of lectures on India, delivered at Morley College, the Evening Institutes of the London County Cow1cil, Toynbee Hall and elsewhere, at-· tracted considerable attention.
    [Show full text]