(Ephemeroptera: Siphlonuridae) in a Montana Spring Brook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Western North American Naturalist Volume 69 Number 4 Article 15 12-17-2009 Note on the occurrence of Siphlonurus autumnalis (Ephemeroptera: Siphlonuridae) in a Montana spring brook Robert L. Newell University of Montana, Polson, [email protected] Michelle L. Anderson University of Montana Western, Dillon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation Newell, Robert L. and Anderson, Michelle L. (2009) "Note on the occurrence of Siphlonurus autumnalis (Ephemeroptera: Siphlonuridae) in a Montana spring brook," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 69 : No. 4 , Article 15. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol69/iss4/15 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 69(4), © 2009, pp. 551–555 NOTE ON THE OCCURRENCE OF SIPHLONURUS AUTUMNALIS (EPHEMEROPTERA: SIPHLONURIDAE) IN A MONTANA SPRING BROOK Robert L. Newell1 and Michelle L. Anderson2 ABSTRACT.—The little-known mayfly Siphlonurus autumnalis McDunnough (Ephemeroptera: Siphlonuridae) was col- lected from several locations in its floodplain habitats along the Middle Fork of the Flathead River in western Montana. To confirm identification, nymphs were reared along with an associated species, S. occidentalis Eaton (Ephemeroptera: Siphlonuridae). Adults emerged from 6 September until 16 October. Habitats are described and the first photos of the 2 sexes are provided. Key words: mayfly, Siphlonurus autumnalis, emergence, habitats, Montana, spring brook. The biology of the mayfly Siphlonurus This spring brook arises from groundwater autumnalis McDunnough is so poorly known seeps at about 1009 m elevation and flows that the nymphs were only recently described westward, eventually into a side channel of (Jacobus and McCafferty 2002). Siphlonurus the Middle Fork of the Flathead River. During autumnalis has been recorded in Montana the annual peak in the river hydrograph (Newell 1970, Randolph 2002, McCafferty and (June–July), the spring channel contains a por- Newell 2007), Washington (Jensen 1966, tion of the Flathead River discharge. This flow Jacobus and McCafferty 2002, Randolph 2002), of surface water from the main channel into and the Canadian provinces of Alberta and the spring brook is cut off when the river dis- British Columbia (McDunnough 1931, Ran- charge declines by late July. The sampling dolph 2002). Jacobus and McCafferty (2002) location was approximately 100 m from the suggested that this species is seldom collected spring source in an area 4 m wide and a maxi- because of the difficulty in accessing larvae mum of 30 cm deep with a substrate of cobble, habitat, which includes the rocky edgewaters gravel, sand, and silt. Flow was barely percep- of large rivers (Edmunds et al. 1976). We sug- tible at <1 cms. gest there may be other reasons why S. autum- Anderson (2008) and Chilcote (2004) col- nalis is rarely collected: notably, the immature lected at this location on numerous occasions nymphs are nearly impossible to identify, the during 2002–2005. Their summer sampling species is often associated with other species revealed mature nymphs of S. occidentalis and of Siphlonurus, and the published habitat is a smaller unidentifiable Siphlonurus. Late sum- incomplete. mer collections (12 September 2003) revealed Opportunities to collect large numbers of subimagoes of S. autumnalis. It was concluded Siphlonurus from a variety of habitats was the small previously collected nymphs were afforded through a long-term ecological study probably S. autumnalis. The presence of these of aquatic habitats associated with the Nyack 2 Siphlonurus species in this small spring Floodplain of the Middle Fork of the Flathead brook provided an opportunity to learn more River in western Montana. The study area was about the biology of these species through fur- located in Flathead County, Montana, approxi- ther sampling. Our goals were to determine mately 16 km northeast of West Glacier along population composition of the 2 species, deter- the southern boundary of Glacier National mine emergence timing, and provide photos Park. Siphlonurus occidentalis and S. autum- of the 2 sexes of S. autumnalis. nalis were particularly abundant in a small Crazy Beaver Spring Brook was visited on spring brook, locally called Crazy Beaver 31 August 2007, 15 September 2007, and 5 Spring Brook (48°28፱16.77፳N, 113°49፱21.11፳W). October 2007 for the purpose of obtaining 1Flathead Lake Biological Station of The University of Montana, 32125 Bio Station Lane, Polson, MT 59860-6815. E-mail: [email protected] 2Biology Department, University of Montana Western, 710 S. Atlantic, Dillon, MT 59725. 551 552 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 69 Fig. 1. Emergence sequence of laboratory-reared Siphlonurus occidentalis. Fig. 2. Emergence sequence of laboratory-reared Siphlonurus autumnalis. specimens of Siphlonurus for identification and Digital photos were taken of nymphs, subima- rearing. Nymphs were collected using a kicknet goes, and imagoes. Nymphs of some associated (125-micron mesh). Part of the sample was pre- mayfly species were also retained, allowed to served in 80% ethyl alcohol and returned to the emerge, and identified to species. laboratory where nymphs were identified and On 31 August 2007, we collected 35 S. occi- counted. The remainder of the sample was dentalis nymphs, most of which had black wing placed into aerated chambers with spring water, pads. We also collected 20 Siphlonurus nymphs refrigerated, and transported to the University that were unidentifiable to species but were of Montana’s Flathead Lake Biological Station presumably S. autumnalis. Water temperature (FLBS). In the laboratory, the live nymphs were in the spring brook was 10 °C. On 15 Septem- placed into flow-through, aerated emergence ber 2007 we collected 7 S. occidentalis nymphs chambers at a temper ature of 11°C. Screening with black pads, 20 S. autumnalis nymphs with was placed over the emergence chambers to black pads, and 10 Siphlonurus nymphs without retain adults. The light cycle was 12 hours of black pads that were unidentifiable to species. light and 12 hours of dark. The chambers were Water temperature in the spring brook was checked daily for adults. Adults and nymphal again 10 °C. On 5 October 2007, no Siphlonurus skins were collected, identified, and preserved. nymphs were present and water temperature 2009] NOTES 553 Fig. 3. Ventral abdomen of Siphlonurus occidentalis subimago. in the spring brook was 8 °C. Additional mayfly (McDunnough 1931); Utah—May–October taxa present during the collection dates were (Edmunds 1952); Washington—July and August Timpanoga hecuba (Eaton) (Ephemeroptera: (Meyer and McCafferty 2007b); and Montana— Ephemerellidae), Paraleptophlebia bicornuta July–September (Newell unpublished data). We (McDunnough) (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebi- also found evidence to support the observation idae), Ameletus validus McDunnough (Ephem - that S. autumnalis is a fall emerger (McDun- er optera: Amel etidae), Ameletus similior Mc - nough 1931, Jacobus and McCafferty 2002). Dunnough (Eph em eroptera: Ameletidae), and Siphlonurus occidentalis and S. autumnalis Centroptilum conturbatum McDunnough (Eph - clearly coexist in Crazy Beaver spring brook. em eroptera: Baetidae). Both species were nearly equal in abundance A total of 37 S. occidentalis and 34 S. autum- in our fall 2007 samples (Figs. 1, 2). Subima- nalis adults emerged from the emergence goes were collected in the field on 12 Septem- chambers. The rearing chamber results may ber 2007, but it is questionable if emergence not reflect the true emergence patterns of these to maturity occurred in the field during late species, but coupled with the results of previous September and early October in the study field collections (Chilcote 2004, Anderson 2008), area. Freezing air temperatures are common the results do offer an index of relative after mid-September, and ice formed in shal- abundance and a possible range of dates for low reaches of the spring in early October, emergence (Figs. 1, 2). Our results support although the spring typically retains some ice- the pre viously reported emergence timing free reaches throughout the winter. for S. occidentalis as summer–fall: Oregon— In the process of identifying Siphlonurus March–August (Meyer and McCafferty 2007a); specimens to species, we found that mature Alaska—July (Harper and Harper 1981); nymphs and subimagoes of S. occidentalis were Idaho—July, September (Jensen 1966); Ari- easily identified by the U-shaped pattern on zona—June (Allen and Chao 1981); Alberta each sternite (Fig. 3). This pattern appears some and British Columbia—August, September time before the nymphs mature, just prior to 554 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 69 Fig. 4. Ventral surface of male (left) and female (right) Siphlonurus autumnalis nymphs. development of black wing pads, thus increas- actually the color of the subimago adult show- ing the chance of identifying nymphs to species ing through the nymphal skin, similar to S. using abdominal coloration. Male S. autum- occidentalis (Edmunds 1952). The late sum- nalis nymphs can be identified by the dorsal mer emergence of S. autumnalis and the lack touching of the eyes, a
Recommended publications
  • 1.- Heptageniidae, Ephemerellidae, Leptophlebiidae & Palingeniidae

    1.- Heptageniidae, Ephemerellidae, Leptophlebiidae & Palingeniidae

    PRIVATE UBRARV OF WILLIAM L. PETERS Revue suisse Zool. I Tome 99 Fasc. 4 p. 835-858 I Geneve, decembre 1992 Mayflies from Israel (lnsecta; Ephemeroptera) 1.- Heptageniidae, Ephemerellidae, Leptophlebiidae & Palingeniidae * by Michel SARTORI 1 With 45 figures ABSTRACT This paper is the first part of a work dealing with the mayfly fauna of Israel. Eleven species are reported here. The most diversified family is the Heptageniidae with six species belonging to six different genera: Rhithrogena znojkoi (Tshemova), Epeorus zaitzevi Tshemova, Ecdyonurus asiaeminoris Demoulin, Electrogena galileae (Demoulin) (comb. nov.), Afronurus kugleri Demoulin and Heptagenia samochai (Demoulin) (comb. nov.). E. zaitzevi is new for the fauna of Israel. The male of H. samochai is described for the first time and the synonymy with H. lutea Kluge (syn. nov.) is proposed. Eggs of the six species are described and illustrated. Keys are provided for nymphs and adults. Ephemerellidae are represented by a single species, Ephemerella mesoleuca (Brauer). Leptophlebiid species are: Paraleptophlebia submarginata (Stephens), Choroterpes (Ch.) picteti Eaton and Choroterpes (Euthraulus) ortali nov. sp. described at all stages. New features to distinguish the nymphs of the Mediterranean Euthraulus species are provided. One species of Palingeniidae has been found in the collections of Bet Gordon Museum in Deganya: Palingenia orientalis Chopra. The female of this species is described for the first time. P. orientalis disappeared from the investigated area in the early fifties. Some geographical data are given on the distribution of the species inside and outside the investigated area, as well as some ecological observations. For instance, underwater emergence is reported for the first time in the genus Afronurus.
  • Pisciforma, Setisura, and Furcatergalia (Order: Ephemeroptera) Are Not Monophyletic Based on 18S Rdna Sequences: a Reply to Sun Et Al

    Pisciforma, Setisura, and Furcatergalia (Order: Ephemeroptera) Are Not Monophyletic Based on 18S Rdna Sequences: a Reply to Sun Et Al

    Utah Valley University From the SelectedWorks of T. Heath Ogden 2008 Pisciforma, Setisura, and Furcatergalia (Order: Ephemeroptera) are not monophyletic based on 18S rDNA sequences: A Reply to Sun et al. (2006) T. Heath Ogden, Utah Valley University Available at: https://works.bepress.com/heath_ogden/9/ LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Pisciforma, Setisura, and Furcatergalia (Order: Ephemeroptera) Are Not Monophyletic Based on 18S rDNA Sequences: A Response to Sun et al. (2006) 1 2 3 T. HEATH OGDEN, MICHEL SARTORI, AND MICHAEL F. WHITING Sun et al. (2006) recently published an analysis of able on GenBank October 2003. However, they chose phylogenetic relationships of the major lineages of not to include 34 other mayßy 18S rDNA sequences mayßies (Ephemeroptera). Their study used partial that were available 18 mo before submission of their 18S rDNA sequences (Ϸ583 nucleotides), which were manuscript (sequences available October 2003; their analyzed via parsimony to obtain a molecular phylo- manuscript was submitted 1 March 2005). If the au- genetic hypothesis. Their study included 23 mayßy thors had included these additional taxa, they would species, representing 20 families. They aligned the have increased their generic and familial level sam- DNA sequences via default settings in Clustal and pling to include lineages such as Leptohyphidae, Pota- reconstructed a tree by using parsimony in PAUP*. manthidae, Behningiidae, Neoephemeridae, Epheme- However, this tree was not presented in the article, rellidae, and Euthyplociidae. Additionally, there were nor have they made the topology or alignment avail- 194 sequences available (as of 1 March 2005) for other able despite multiple requests. This molecular tree molecular markers, aside from 18S, that could have was compared with previous hypotheses based on been used to investigate higher level relationships.
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017

    List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017

    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
  • UFRJ a Paleoentomofauna Brasileira

    UFRJ a Paleoentomofauna Brasileira

    Anuário do Instituto de Geociências - UFRJ www.anuario.igeo.ufrj.br A Paleoentomofauna Brasileira: Cenário Atual The Brazilian Fossil Insects: Current Scenario Dionizio Angelo de Moura-Júnior; Sandro Marcelo Scheler & Antonio Carlos Sequeira Fernandes Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências: Patrimônio Geopaleontológico, Museu Nacional, Quinta da Boa Vista s/nº, São Cristóvão, 20940-040. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Recebido em: 24/01/2018 Aprovado em: 08/03/2018 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11137/2018_1_142_166 Resumo O presente trabalho fornece um panorama geral sobre o conhecimento da paleoentomologia brasileira até o presente, abordando insetos do Paleozoico, Mesozoico e Cenozoico, incluindo a atualização das espécies publicadas até o momento após a última grande revisão bibliográica, mencionando ainda as unidades geológicas em que ocorrem e os trabalhos relacionados. Palavras-chave: Paleoentomologia; insetos fósseis; Brasil Abstract This paper provides an overview of the Brazilian palaeoentomology, about insects Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic, including the review of the published species at the present. It was analiyzed the geological units of occurrence and the related literature. Keywords: Palaeoentomology; fossil insects; Brazil Anuário do Instituto de Geociências - UFRJ 142 ISSN 0101-9759 e-ISSN 1982-3908 - Vol. 41 - 1 / 2018 p. 142-166 A Paleoentomofauna Brasileira: Cenário Atual Dionizio Angelo de Moura-Júnior; Sandro Marcelo Schefler & Antonio Carlos Sequeira Fernandes 1 Introdução Devoniano Superior (Engel & Grimaldi, 2004). Os insetos são um dos primeiros organismos Algumas ordens como Blattodea, Hemiptera, Odonata, Ephemeroptera e Psocopera surgiram a colonizar os ambientes terrestres e aquáticos no Carbonífero com ocorrências até o recente, continentais (Engel & Grimaldi, 2004).
  • A Comparative Study of the Costs of Alternative Mayfly Oviposition Behaviors

    A Comparative Study of the Costs of Alternative Mayfly Oviposition Behaviors

    Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2007) 61:1437–1448 DOI 10.1007/s00265-007-0376-4 ORIGINAL PAPER A comparative study of the costs of alternative mayfly oviposition behaviors Andrea C. Encalada & Barbara L. Peckarsky Received: 10 April 2006 /Revised: 5 February 2007 /Accepted: 7 February 2007 /Published online: 2 March 2007 # Springer-Verlag 2007 Abstract Oviposition behavior of insects has associated downstream while releasing their eggs (floaters). Almost fitness costs related to the probability that females survive 100% of lander and 50% of dipper females had not to oviposit. During summer 2003, we observed the oviposited when captured on sticky traps, increasing their oviposition behavior and compared the mortality rates of vulnerability to preoviposition mortality by aerial predators females of 17 mayfly species in one western Colorado compared to mayflies with other behaviors. In contrast, watershed. We dissected adult females collected on terres- most females had laid their eggs before drowning or being trial sticky traps, in drift nets submerged in streams, and in eaten by a fish (50–90%). However, groups with oviposi- stomachs of brook trout to determine whether the mayflies tion behaviors most exposed to the water surface (floaters, had oviposited before capture, drowning, or consumption. then splashers, dippers, and landers) were more vulnerable Females oviposited by either splashing on the water surface to drowning before completing oviposition. In addition, releasing all their eggs (splashers), dropping their eggs from splashers and floaters were most vulnerable to predation by the air (bombers), dipping their abdomens multiple times brook trout before ovipositing. These data suggest that releasing a few eggs at a time (dippers), landing on rocks fitness costs associated with preoviposition mortality may and ovipositing on the undersides (landers), or floating be considerable depending on mayfly oviposition behavior.
  • CHAPTER 4: EPHEMEROPTERA (Mayflies)

    CHAPTER 4: EPHEMEROPTERA (Mayflies)

    Guide to Aquatic Invertebrate Families of Mongolia | 2009 CHAPTER 4 EPHEMEROPTERA (Mayflies) EPHEMEROPTERA Draft June 17, 2009 Chapter 4 | EPHEMEROPTERA 45 Guide to Aquatic Invertebrate Families of Mongolia | 2009 ORDER EPHEMEROPTERA Mayflies 4 Mayfly larvae are found in a variety of locations including lakes, wetlands, streams, and rivers, but they are most common and diverse in lotic habitats. They are common and abundant in stream riffles and pools, at lake margins and in some cases lake bottoms. All mayfly larvae are aquatic with terrestrial adults. In most mayfly species the adult only lives for 1-2 days. Consequently, the majority of a mayfly’s life is spent in the water as a larva. The adult lifespan is so short there is no need for the insect to feed and therefore the adult does not possess functional mouthparts. Mayflies are often an indicator of good water quality because most mayflies are relatively intolerant of pollution. Mayflies are also an important food source for fish. Ephemeroptera Morphology Most mayflies have three caudal filaments (tails) (Figure 4.1) although in some taxa the terminal filament (middle tail) is greatly reduced and there appear to be only two caudal filaments (only one genus actually lacks the terminal filament). Mayflies have gills on the dorsal surface of the abdomen (Figure 4.1), but the number and shape of these gills vary widely between taxa. All mayflies possess only one tarsal claw at the end of each leg (Figure 4.1). Characters such as gill shape, gill position, and tarsal claw shape are used to separate different mayfly families.
  • Invertebrate Prey Selectivity of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus Punctatus) in Western South Dakota Prairie Streams Erin D

    Invertebrate Prey Selectivity of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus Punctatus) in Western South Dakota Prairie Streams Erin D

    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2017 Invertebrate Prey Selectivity of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in Western South Dakota Prairie Streams Erin D. Peterson South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Peterson, Erin D., "Invertebrate Prey Selectivity of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in Western South Dakota Prairie Streams" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1677. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/1677 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INVERTEBRATE PREY SELECTIVITY OF CHANNEL CATFISH (ICTALURUS PUNCTATUS) IN WESTERN SOUTH DAKOTA PRAIRIE STREAMS BY ERIN D. PETERSON A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree for the Master of Science Major in Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University 2017 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks provided funding for this project. Oak Lake Field Station and the Department of Natural Resource Management at South Dakota State University provided lab space. My sincerest thanks to my advisor, Dr. Nels H. Troelstrup, Jr., for all of the guidance and support he has provided over the past three years and for taking a chance on me.
  • Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Ephemerellidae, Attenella Margarita (Needham, 1927): Southeastern Range Istributio

    Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Ephemerellidae, Attenella Margarita (Needham, 1927): Southeastern Range Istributio

    ISSN 1809-127X (online edition) © 2010 Check List and Authors Chec List Open Access | Freely available at www.checklist.org.br Journal of species lists and distribution N Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Ephemerellidae, Attenella margarita (Needham, 1927): Southeastern range ISTRIBUTIO D extension to North Carolina, USA 1* 2 RAPHIC Luke M. Jacobus and Eric D. Fleek G EO G N 1 Indiana University, Department of Biology, 1001 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. O 2 Environmental Sciences Section, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, NC, 27606, USA. * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] OTES N Abstract: New data from the Great Smoky Mountains, in Swain County, North Carolina, USA, extend the geographic range of Attenella margarita (Needham, 1927) (Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Ephemerellidae) southeast by approximately 1,300 A. margarita Head, thoracic and abdominal characters for distinguishing larvae of A. margarita from the sympatric species, A. attenuata (McDunnough,km. We confirm 1925), that are illustrated has and a disjunctdiscussed. east-west distribution in North America, which is rare among mayflies. Needham (1927) described Ephemerella margarita Figure 4), so its diagnostic utility is limited. Adults were Needham, 1927, (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae) based associated with Needham’s (1927) larvae tentatively by on larvae from Utah, USA (Traver 1935). Allen (1980) McDunnough (1931) and Allen and Edmunds (1961). established the present binomial combination, Attenella Jacobus and McCafferty (2008) recently reviewed margarita, by elevating subgenera of Ephemerella Walsh the systematics of Attenella. The genus is restricted to to genus status. Attenella margarita larvae (Figure 1) are North America and solely comprises the tribe Attenellini distinguishable from other Attenella Edmunds species McCafferty of the subfamily Timpanoginae Allen.
  • TB142: Mayflies of Maine: an Annotated Faunal List

    TB142: Mayflies of Maine: an Annotated Faunal List

    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Technical Bulletins Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station 4-1-1991 TB142: Mayflies of aine:M An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian K. Elizabeth Gibbs Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_techbulletin Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Burian, S.K., and K.E. Gibbs. 1991. Mayflies of Maine: An annotated faunal list. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 142. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Bulletins by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN 0734-9556 Mayflies of Maine: An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian and K. Elizabeth Gibbs Technical Bulletin 142 April 1991 MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Mayflies of Maine: An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian Assistant Professor Department of Biology, Southern Connecticut State University New Haven, CT 06515 and K. Elizabeth Gibbs Associate Professor Department of Entomology University of Maine Orono, Maine 04469 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Financial support for this project was provided by the State of Maine Departments of Environmental Protection, and Inland Fisheries and Wildlife; a University of Maine New England, Atlantic Provinces, and Quebec Fellow­ ship to S. K. Burian; and the Maine Agricultural Experiment Station. Dr. William L. Peters and Jan Peters, Florida A & M University, pro­ vided support and advice throughout the project and we especially appreci­ ated the opportunity for S.K. Burian to work in their laboratory and stay in their home in Tallahassee, Florida.
  • Invertebrates

    Invertebrates

    State Wildlife Action Plan Update Appendix A-5 Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fact Sheets INVERTEBRATES Conservation Status and Concern Biology and Life History Distribution and Abundance Habitat Needs Stressors Conservation Actions Needed Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 2015 Appendix A-5 SGCN Invertebrates – Fact Sheets Table of Contents What is Included in Appendix A-5 1 MILLIPEDE 2 LESCHI’S MILLIPEDE (Leschius mcallisteri)........................................................................................................... 2 MAYFLIES 4 MAYFLIES (Ephemeroptera) ................................................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Cinygmula gartrelli) .................................................................................................................... 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia falcula) ............................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia jenseni) ............................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Siphlonurus autumnalis) .............................................................................................................. 4 [unnamed] (Cinygmula gartrelli) .................................................................................................................... 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia falcula) ...........................................................................................................
  • Monitoring Wilderness Stream Ecosystems

    Monitoring Wilderness Stream Ecosystems

    United States Department of Monitoring Agriculture Forest Service Wilderness Stream Rocky Mountain Ecosystems Research Station General Technical Jeffrey C. Davis Report RMRS-GTR-70 G. Wayne Minshall Christopher T. Robinson January 2001 Peter Landres Abstract Davis, Jeffrey C.; Minshall, G. Wayne; Robinson, Christopher T.; Landres, Peter. 2001. Monitoring wilderness stream ecosystems. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-70. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 137 p. A protocol and methods for monitoring the major physical, chemical, and biological components of stream ecosystems are presented. The monitor- ing protocol is organized into four stages. At stage 1 information is obtained on a basic set of parameters that describe stream ecosystems. Each following stage builds upon stage 1 by increasing the number of parameters and the detail and frequency of the measurements. Stage 4 supplements analyses of stream biotic structure with measurements of stream function: carbon and nutrient processes. Standard methods are presented that were selected or modified through extensive field applica- tion for use in remote settings. Keywords: bioassessment, methods, sampling, macroinvertebrates, production The Authors emphasize aquatic benthic inverte- brates, community dynamics, and Jeffrey C. Davis is an aquatic ecolo- stream ecosystem structure and func- gist currently working in Coastal Man- tion. For the past 19 years he has agement for the State of Alaska. He been conducting research on the received his B.S. from the University long-term effects of wildfires on of Alaska, Anchorage, and his M.S. stream ecosystems. He has authored from Idaho State University. His re- over 100 peer-reviewed journal ar- search has focused on nutrient dy- ticles and 85 technical reports.
  • Abstract Poteat, Monica Deshay

    Abstract Poteat, Monica Deshay

    ABSTRACT POTEAT, MONICA DESHAY. Comparative Trace Metal Physiology in Aquatic Insects. (Under the direction of Dr. David B. Buchwalter). Despite their dominance in freshwater systems and use in biomonitoring and bioassessment programs worldwide, little is known about the ion/metal physiology of aquatic insects. Even less is known about the variability of trace metal physiologies across aquatic insect species. Here, we measured dissolved metal bioaccumulation dynamics using radiotracers in order to 1) gain an understanding of the uptake and interactions of Ca, Cd and Zn at the apical surface of aquatic insects and 2) comparatively analyze metal bioaccumulation dynamics in closely-related aquatic insect species. Dissolved metal uptake and efflux rate constants were calculated for 19 species. We utilized species from families Hydropsychidae (order Trichoptera) and Ephemerellidae (order Ephemeroptera) because they are particularly species-rich and because they are differentially sensitive to metals in the field – Hydropsychidae are relatively tolerant and Ephemerellidae are relatively sensitive. In uptake experiments with Hydropsyche sparna (Hydropsychidae), we found evidence of two shared transport systems for Cd and Zn – a low capacity-high affinity transporter below 0.8 µM, and a second high capacity-low affinity transporter operating at higher concentrations. Cd outcompeted Zn at concentrations above 0.6 µM, suggesting a higher affinity of Cd for a shared transporter at those concentrations. While Cd and Zn uptake strongly co-varied across 12 species (r = 0.96, p < 0.0001), neither Cd nor Zn uptake significantly co-varied with Ca uptake in these species. Further, Ca only modestly inhibited Cd and Zn uptake, while neither Cd nor Zn inhibited Ca uptake at concentrations up to concentrations of 89 nM Cd and 1.53 µM Zn.