Rhode Island Bar Journal
Rhode Island Bar Association Volume 62. Number 6. May/June 2 014
Pre-Bail Revocation Hearing Detention Federal Rules of Civil Procedure The War to End All Wars Refusal Cases: Sworn Repo rt Required BOOK REVIEW: The Hanging and Redemption of John Gordon RHODE I SLAND Bar Association 1898
32 Editor In Chief , David N. Bazar Editor , Frederick D. Massie Assistant Editor , Kathleen M. Bridge Articles Editorial Board Jenna R. Algee, Esq. Matthew R. Plain, Esq. Victoria M. Almeida, Esq. Steven M. Richard, Esq. 7 Not to be Countenanced: Pre-Bail Revocation Hearing Detention Steven J. Boyajian, Esq. Adam D. Riser, Esq. in Rhode Island District Court Peter A. Carvelli, Esq. Miriam A. Ross, Esq. Andrew C. Spacone, Esq. and Robert I. Stolzman, Esq. Jerry Cohen, Esq. Julie Ann Sacks, Esq. Patrick T. Conley, Esq. Hon. Brian P. Stern 15 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Amendments on the Horizon Eric D. Correira, Esq. Stephen J. Sypole, Esq. Stephen J. MacGillivray, Esq. and Raymond M. Ripple, Esq. William J. Delaney, Esq. Christopher Wildenhain, Esq. Amy H. Goins, Esq. 21 Lunch with Legends: Trailblazers, Trendsetters and Adi Goldstein, Esq. Treasures of the Rhode Island Bar Jay S. Goodman, Esq. Matthew R. Plain, Esq. and Elizabeth R. Merritt, Esq. Jenna Wims Hashway, Esq. Christina A. Hoefsmit, Esq. 25 COMMENTARY – The War to End All Wars Marcia McGair Ippolito, Esq. Jerry Elmer, Esq. Thomas A. Lynch, Esq. Ernest G. Mayo, Esq. 29 Refusal Cases: Sworn Report Required John R. McDermott, Esq. Elizabeth R. Merritt, Esq. Thomas M. Bergeron, Esq.
33 BOOK REVIEW – The Hanging and Redemption of John Gordon: RHODE ISLAND BAR ASSOCIATION The True Story of Rhode Island’s Last Execution LAWYER’S PLEDGE As a member of the Rhode Island Bar Association, I pledge by Paul Caranci to conduct myself in a manner that will reflect honor upon Michael S. Pezzullo, Esq. the legal profession. I will treat all partici pants in the legal process with civility. In every aspect of my practice, I will be 37 Windy City Blues – American Bar Association Delegate Report: honest, courteous and fair. ABA Midyear Meeting Executive Director , Helen Desmond McDonald Robert D. Oster, Esq. Association Officers J. Robert Weisberger, Jr., President Bruce W. McIntyre, President-Elect Features Melissa E. Darigan , Treasurer Armando E. Batastini, Secretary 3 Sharing the Wealth of Knowledge 32 Bar Volunteers Supporting Generation Direct advertising inquiries to the Editor, Frederick D. 4 Sign Up For Your 2014-2015 Bar Citizen’s Law Related Education Massie, Rhode Island Bar Journal, 115 Cedar Street, Providence, RI 02903, (401) 421-5740. Committee Membership Today! Initiative 34 New Bar List Serve Gaining New USPS (464-680) ISSN 1079-9230 5 2014 Annual Meeting Features Rhode Island Bar Journal is published bimonthly by Members Daily! Join Today! the Rhode Island Bar Association, 115 Cedar Street, 12 Publish and Prosper in the Rhode 35 Lawyers on the Move Providence, RI 02903. Island Bar Journal PERIODICALS POSTAGE PAID AT PROVIDENCE, RI 13 Tribute – Stephen R. Famiglietti, Esq. 41 Are you an aggre ssive driver Subscription: $30 per year 14 Your Bar’s Lawyer Referral Service 42 In Memoriam Postmaster Builds Your Practice! 45 Reaching Out: Learning the Signs Send Address Correction to Rhode Island Bar Journal, 115 Cedar Street, Providence, RI 02903 23 Continuing Legal Education of Depression and Suicide Risk www.ribar.com 24 Use OAR Today and Pull Together 45 You know my name. Look up the number. as a Team! Front Cover Photograph 30 Dealing with a colleague’s grief 46 Advertiser Index by Brian McDonald America’s Cup 12-Meter, Newport 30 SOLACE – Helping Bar Members in Times of Need Rhode Island Bar Association
Annual Me eting XX% June 19 & 20, 2 01 4 | Providence Cert no. XXX-XXX-000
Sharing the Wealth of Knowledge
This is my final President’s Message, for which ners were progressive yet old school in many many of you may be grateful. Since this is my ways, which was part of the charm. I don’t swan song, as far as President’s Messages go, know of any firms like that today. It was the I would like to say a few words about how for - ideal model for a young lawyer’s training camp tunate I have been to practice law with so many to learn the art of the practice of law. giants of the profession. A person is said to be There was also plenty of opportunity to the sum of his experiences and mine have been learn by observing and listening to some of the rich indeed. state’s best civil trial attorneys and, in many My first position was with the law firm of instances, having the privilege to sit with these Gunning, LaFazia & Gnys, Inc., a veritable who’s marvelous mentors as second chair, in signifi - who of outstanding trial attorneys; to wit, the cant cases, both in state and federal court. One late Raymond LaFazia, Edward L. Gnys, Jr., highlight was a major dram shop defense case J. Robert Weisberger, Jr. Esq. and Guy J. Wells, three attorneys extraordinaire. where I was privileged to sit second chair with President Also in that firm were Netti C. Vogel, now Ed Gnys. It tried in Newport for over six weeks Rhode Island Bar Association of the Superior Court; Jeanne E. LaFazia, now before Justice Israel. Ed and I made the winter Chief Judge of the District Court; Bennett R. trek every day through the snow in January and Gallo, who went on to become a Justice of the February (not the best time to visit Newport!). Superior Court; and, Edward P. Sowa, a distin - I participated in the trial and gained first-hand guished jurist with the Workers’ Compensation experience watching outstanding trial attorneys Court. There were also a great group of young in action. One co-defendant was represented attorneys like Ed Gnys, III, Fred Polacek, Alan by the late Joe Houlihan, a very talented trial A person is said LaFazia, Tom Chester and Vicky Almeida. Every attorney and a great person. Another co-defen - to be the sum of day was an adventure, with new and interesting dant was represented by distinguished trial things to research and learn, memoranda and attorney, the late Gene Higgins. Gene was nearly his experiences appellate briefs to write, motions to prepare, 80 at the time, but he was as smooth as silk and mine have matters to be argued in court almost daily, in his cross-examinations. Of course, Ed Gnys cases to be tried, and sometimes the opportunity won the prize for best actor! (That’s an inside been rich indeed. to argue an appeal before the Rhode Island joke that some of you may get.) He was also Supreme Court, which I was lucky enough to one of the most capable and hard-working trial do several times during my first four years of attorneys I have ever known. We won that trial, practice. I considered myself very fortunate and the appeal, in the first reported case I ever indeed. At that old and venerable firm, a young worked on. attorney could observe, participate in, and Not long after that, there was the plaintiff’s experience what the life of a trial lawyer was case I got to sit second chair on, in a product about, with all the sage advice and guidance liability action in the federal district court with a new attorney could want. Moreover, the Guy “Jack” Wells against learned and formida - merriment and good will shared by all was ble adversaries, Gerry DeMaria and the late, as Dickensian as a scene at Old Fezziwig’s. great Joseph Cavanaugh, Sr. There were also The firm was perhaps a throwback to many, many opportunities to observe the leg - earlier times when aspiring lawyers clerked with endary Raymond LaFazia demonstrate his skill experienced attorneys to learn that which isn’t as a trial lawyer, which my late father would taught in law school – the nuts and bolts of the often refer to as “the highest form of the practice of law. I will never forget my first jury lawyer’s art.” trial. Judge Vogel, then just Netti, could not After four and a half years with that venera - have been more helpful in assisting me with ble firm, I took a position with the law firm of my case. She took great interest and enthusiasm Wistow & Barylick, Inc. There, I learned from in helping me prepare. I think I still have all the two more outstanding Rhode Island trial attor - notes she provided which I used to draft my neys, Max Wistow and John Barylick, whose first trial notebook! I remember everyone there scholarly abilities and skill are legendary. as being so kind and helpful. The senior part - Witnessing their work and their brilliant minds
Rhode Island Bar Journal May/June 20 14 3 analyzing and deciphering complex legal leadership, and especially James J. RHODE ISLAND BAR JOURNAL problems was an opportunity any attor - Skeffington, Esq., for allowing me to Editorial Statement ney would consider lucky to experience. dedicate the time necessary to serve as The Rhode Island Bar Journal is the Rhode Island Bar Association’s official magazine for Rhode Island As with my prior position, there were president this year. attorneys, judges and others interested in Rhode Island also young, talented associates to grow My term is now just about over and law. The Bar Journal is a paid, subscription magazine with in the practice of law who have now I can hardly believe how fast the year has published bi-monthly, six times annually and sent to, become outstanding attorneys in their own gone by, not to mention the last 30 years! among others, all practicing attorneys and sitting judges, in Rhode Island. This constitutes an audience of over right, such as Steve Sheehan, Peter Loveley We all get bogged down occasionally by 6,000 individuals. Covering issues of relevance and pro - and the indomitable Mark Grimm. While the responsibilities of life and the rigors viding updates on events, programs and meetings, the there, I was privileged to try several cases of our profession. Therefore, I am happy Rhode Island Bar Journal is a magazine that is read on over the years, some of which were to have had the opportunity to serve our arrival and, most often, kept for future reference. The Bar Journal publishes scholarly discourses, commen - against great opponents such as David Bar Association and have the opportunity tary on the law and Bar activities, and articles on the Carroll, one of the most talented defense to publicly thank all of the outstanding administration of justice. While the Journal is a serious trial attorneys in Rhode Island. You learn attorneys who I have had the privilege magazine, our articles are not dull or somber. We strive to publish a topical, thought-provoking magazine that a lot from your adversaries. One lesson to learn from over the years. I wish to addresses issues of interest to significant segments of I hope I learned is aplomb or, in other express my sincere gratitude for all you the Bar. We aim to publish a magazine that is read, words, confidence and skill under pressure. have taught me. Neither my career nor quoted and retained. The Bar Journal encourages the When I became a shareholder at the Bar presidency would have been as free expression of ideas by Rhode Island Bar members. The Bar Journal assumes no responsibility for opinions, Wistow & Barylick, I thought I would rich and fulfilling without the learning statements and facts in signed articles, except to the finish my career at that distinguished experiences I gained from all of you. ex tent that, by publication, the subject matter merits venue. However, after more than two Finally, there was of course one other attention. The opinions expressed in editorials represent the views of at least two-thirds of the Editorial Board, decades of trial practice, I decided to attorney I want to thank. He was a legal and they are not the official view of the Rhode Island take advantage of an unusual and exciting scholar, an outstanding jurist and a gen - Bar Association. Letters to the Editors are welcome. opportunity, a position in a litigation tleman in the true sense of the word. He Article Selection Criteria management department with 20 other had the utmost influence over my life. • The Rhode Island Bar Journal gives primary prefer - attorneys as national litigation counsel He was my father, the late Chief Justice ence to original articles, written expressly for first for a Fortune 500 company. In that posi - Emeritus. I only wish he could have been publication in the Bar Journal , by members of the Rhode Island Bar Association. The Bar Journal does tion, I became part of a team supervising around for another year to see me serve not accept unsolicited articles from individuals who and working with trial counsel in other the term as President of the Rhode Island are not members of the Rhode Island Bar Association. jurisdictions. Together, we defend our Bar. If you could only know what great Articles previously appearing in other publications are not accepted. client in venues throughout the United respect he had for each one of you as • All submitted articles are subject to the Journal’s States. That position, which I currently members of our profession, it would editors’ approval, and they reserve the right to edit hold with one of the oldest and venerable make you swell with pride as it did for or reject any articles and article titles submitted for firms in the state, Edwards Wildman me. So, in closing, a heartfelt thank you publication. • Selection for publication is based on the article’s Palmer, formerly Edwards & Angell, to all of the attorneys and judges who relevance to our readers, determined by content and allowed me to serve as Bar president. have been such a positive influence over timeliness. Articles appealing to the widest range of Without my firm’s gracious support, the years and thank you to all the mem - interests are particularly appreciated. However, com - mentaries dealing with more specific areas of law are the time commitment for such a respon- bers of the Bar for allowing me to serve given equally serious consideration. sibility would never have been possible. as president. It has been a privilege and • Preferred format includes: a clearly presented state - Accordingly, I want to thank the firm’s an honor! O ment of purpose and/or thesis in the introduction; supporting evidence or arguments in the body; and a summary conclusion. • Citations conform to the Uniform System of Citation • Maximum article size is approximately 3,500 words. Sign Up For Your 2014-2015 Bar Committee However, shorter articles are preferred. • While authors may be asked to edit articles them - Membership Today! selves, the editors reserve the right to edit pieces for legal size, presentation and grammar. • If you have not yet signed up as a member of a 20 14-2 015 Rhode Island Bar Association Articles are accepted for review on a rolling basis. Meeting the criteria noted above does not guarantee Committee, please do so toda y. Even Bar members who served on Bar Committees publication. Articles are selected and published at the this year must reaffirm their interest for the coming year, as Committee member - discretion of the editors. • Submissions are preferred in a Microsoft Word for - ship does not automatically carry over from one Bar year to the next. Bar members mat emailed as an attachment or on disc. Hard copy may complete a Committee registration form online or download and return a form to the is acceptable, but not recommended. Ba r. Please join no more than three committees. • Authors are asked to include an identification of their current legal position and a photograph, (headshot) >> To sign up for a 20 14-20 15 Bar Committee, please go to the Bar’s website preferably in a jpg file of, at least, 350 d.p.i., with their article submission. at www.ribar.com and go to the MEMBERS LOGIN . After LOGIN , click on the Direct inquiries and send articles and author’s BAR COMMITTEE SIGN-UP link. << photographs for publication consideration to: Rhode Island Bar Journal Editor Frederick D. Massie As an alternative, you may download the Bar Committee Application form appearing email: fmassie @ribar.com above the button and mail or fax it to the Bar Association. Please only use one method telephone: 40 1-421-5740 to register to avoid duplication. If you have any questions concerning membership or the Material published in the Rhode Island Bar Journal remains the property of the Journal , and the author sign-up process, please contact Kathleen Bridge at (401) 4 21-5 740. consents to the rights of the Rhode Island Bar Journal to copyright the work.
4 May/June 20 14 Rhode Island Bar Journal 20 14 Annual Meeting Features
Features Attorney Stephen H. Oleskey’s Keynote on the Ethical and Tactical Issues Arising in Habeus Corpus Litigation, a Session on Cyber Security Risks for Lawyers and More!
The Bar Association’s 2014 Annual Meeting is on Thursday and Friday, June 19th and 20th, at the Rhode Island Convention Center, providing attendees with outstanding opportunities to learn, to improve your practice, socialize with your colleagues, and fulfill annual CLE requirements. A wide range of 42 seminars offer guidance in family, probate, criminal, trial and commercial law, a variety of ethics-related topics, the popular State and Federal Court updates and more.
This year’s Keynote Speaker is Stephen H. Oleskey, of counsel to the Boston office of Hiscock & Barclay law firm, and co-lead counsel in Boudmediene v. Bush , where the U.S. Supreme Court held that detainees at Guantanamo had the right to seek habeus corpus . Thursday night begins with a lively reception followed by dinner, Annual Bar Awards for outstanding achievements, recogni - tion of exceptional pro bono work, and an address by incoming Bar Association President, Bruce W. McIntyre. The Annual Awards Luncheon on Friday, honors 50-year and Bar Journal contributors, while Rhode Island Supreme Court Chief Stephen H. Oleskey, Esq. Justice Paul A. Suttell will deliver his update on the Rhode Island Judiciary.
As technological devices are increasingly utilized within the legal field, the threat to the security of information stored, and digitally transferred by lawyers, grows as well. To learn more about cyber security risks and ethical issues, check out Professor Niki Kuckes’ Friday plenary session.
To learn about the increasingly complex debate regarding the legal rights of nonhumans, visit Attorney Elizabeth Stein’s Niki Kuckes Friday afternoon session, and hear about the potential impact Elizabeth Stein, Esq. Roger Williams University Law Professor it could have on your practice.
Seminar Once again this year, all seminar materials are provided to attendees on a USB Materials flash drive included in the registration cost. While printed seminar materials are Flash Drive available, they must be pre-ordered, and there is an added charge of $30. Those Format & who want the printed version must check the appropriate box on the registration Printed form and pay the fee. Switches from the flash drive to the printed materials are Alternative not allowed at the Meeting. At-the-door registrants only receive a USB flash.
Bar members may use the registration form on the inside back cover of the 20 14 Annual Meeting brochure or access the brochure and/or the interactive registration form available, online, at the Bar’s website: www.ribar.com .
Rhode Island Bar Journal May/June 20 14 5 The Attorneys Advantage online application process offers a convenient way for small firms to get a professional liability coverage quote – Quick. Easy. Online! We don’t think all the extra work required It’s As Simple As: to secure professional liability coverage should keep you from addressing your clients’ QUOTE. CLICK. DONE. pressing needs. That’s why we streamlined At www.attorneys-advantage.com/online our application process. Simply log on to you’ll find immediate access to dependable www.attorneys-advantage.com/online. coverage plus useful tools and information to help you manage your firm’s risk and reduce Depending on the size and location of your the chance of claims. And, while visiting the firm, you may qualify to obtain a real-time site, you can also register your email address quote and the option to purchase online; or to receive additional information about the you’ll be able to submit an application online program. for further review. Either way, we think you’ll find our streamlined online application process more convenient than ever. Now available Auto & Home Insurance Program for Rhode Island Bar Members
Apply online today! Visit www.attorneys-advantage.com/online
The Attorneys Advantage Professional Liability Program is Sponsored By
Attorneys Advantage online process is brought to you by Affinity Insurance Services, Inc., in association with Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc. (a member company of Liberty Mutual Group). Affinity Insurance Services, Inc. is the program administrator of the Attorneys Advantage program.
Aon Affinity, is the brand name for the brokerage and program administration operations of Affinity Insurance Services, Inc.; (AR 244489); in CA, MN & OK , AIS Affinity Insurance Agency, Inc. (CA 0795465); in CA, Aon Affinity Insurance Services, Inc., (0G94493), Aon Direct Insurance Administrator and Berkely Insurance Agency and in NY and NH, AIS Affinity Insurance Agency Insurance underwritten by Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc. (a member company of Liberty Mutual Group). Liberty International Underwriters® is the promotional name of this entity. Home office: New York City, New York. Please consult the specimen policy language for specific language or benefit definitions. Not all policy features are available in all states. E-10301-0713
6 May/June 20 14 Rhode Island Bar Journal Not to be Countenanced: Pre-Bail Revocation Hearing Detention in Rhode Island District Court
Rule 46 of the Rhode Island District Court to current practice, a misdemeanor defendant Rules of Criminal Procedure governs bail prac - is held for two weeks in the Adult Correctional tice in District Court misdemeanor cases. Rule Institution (ACI) , without an opportunity for 46(a) states: “[i]n accordance with the Consti- bail, and without a hearing prior to being held. tu tion and laws of this State, a defendant shall Since it is uncommon for District Court misde - be admitted to bail before conviction.” Rule meanor defendants to receive any jail time, even 46(d) allows the Court to place conditions on after a full trial, this practice of customary two bail “to assure for the person’s appearance, for week pre-bail revocation hearing detention the person’s good behavior and that the person seems particularly harsh. By way of illustration, will keep the peace.” Under Rule 46(g), if a a defendant charged with simple assault and defendant violates a condition of bail, the battery would only be facing a sentence ranging Peter F. Skwirz, Esq. Attorney General can move to have bail revoked from a filing (if the assault is not serious and Practices out of East or have more stringent bail conditions set. If a the defendant has no prior convictions) up to Providence defendant commits an additional misdemeanor a year suspended sentence and year probation while on bail, it is considered a violation of the (due to recent prior convictions or if the assault condition requiring him to keep the peace and was particularly serious). Neither of these sen - be of good behavior. Therefore, when a second tences, if successfully completed, would require misdemeanor offense is alleged while the defen - the defendant to spend any time in jail. Addition- dant is on bail for the first misdemeanor charge, ally, if the defendant elects not to plea, he is bail revocation proceedings are triggered. entitled to a trial where the prosecuting attor - Although not In misdemeanor bail revocation proceedings, ney must produce evidence to prove the charge often challenged, the defendant is first brought before a judge or against him beyond a reasonable doubt. How - magistrate of the District Court sitting on the ever, if that same defendant elects to exercise there is a strong arraignment calendar. The judge will arraign his or her right to trial and the complaining argument that the the defendant on the second misdemeanor witness files another complaint against him or charge and set a date, two weeks in the future, her before the trial on the first charge is held, current practice for a bail revocation hearing. It is routine prac - this will likely result in a second misdemeanor of a standard tice for the judge or magistrate to order the charge. The second charge would constitute defendant held without bail pending the revo - an alleged bail violation for bail set in the first two week pre-bail cation hearing. After the defendant is ordered charge, and the defendant would be subject to revocation hearing held without bail, he or she will then be incar - an immediate two week detention pending a cerated for two weeks waiting for a bail revoca - bail revocation hearing. This detention would detention in mis - tion hearing. At the revocation hearing, the occur at a time when neither of the misde - demeanor cases defendant has the right to confront and cross- meanor charges had been tried. examine witnesses against him or her, testify Another harsh aspect of pre-bail revocation is at odds with on his or her own behalf, present witnesses, and hearing detention is when the defendant is ini - the Rhode Island be represented by counsel. After the revocation tially brought into court on the second misde - hearing, a judge or magistrate of the District meanor charge, he or she is often faced with a Constitution and Court determines whether a bail violation has dilemma: either plea immediately to all charges established Rhode occurred. If the judge or magistrate is reason - currently pending against him or her and receive ably satisfied a violation occurred, then the a disposition allowing him or her to walk free Island Supreme judge or magistrate may order the defendant (e.g. probation or a suspended sentence) or Court case-law. held without bail pending trial, or may impose maintain his or her innocence and spend two more stringent bail conditions pending trial. If weeks in the ACI waiting for a bail revocation no violation is found, then the bail on the origi - hearing. Faced with this choice, most defendants nal misdemeanor charge is maintained, and the choose the option that allows them to walk free second misdemeanor charge is often dismissed. immediately. This dilemma leads many defen - Pending a bail revocation hearing, according dants to plea to crimes without due considera -
Rhode Island Bar Journal May/June 20 14 7 tion given to the case. If the defendant manages to obtain private counsel or is represented by the Public Defender, the dilemma often forces a defendant to plea without allowing his or her counsel time to adequately examine and prepare the case, without giving counsel an opportu - nity to negotiate with a prosecuting attor - ney (as only a prosecuting police officer is present at arraignments), without giving counsel time to file motions to suppress or to dismiss and without allowing coun - sel to take the case to trial if appropriate. In this way, the truth-finding function of the criminal justice system is undermined.
Rhode Island Bail & Bail Revocation Law Although not often challenged, there is a strong argument that the current practice of a standard two week pre-bail revocation hearing detention in misde - meanor cases is at odds with the Rhode Island Constitution and established Rhode Island Supreme Court case-law. The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution merely states: “[e]xcessive bail shall not be required,” but “says nothing about whether bail shall be avail - able.” 1 Accordingly, the federal Constitu - tion allows detention for “regulatory purposes” other than ensuring the defen - dant’s presence at trial .2 By contrast, Article I, Section 9 of the Rhode Island Constitution guarantees a defendant the right to bail on any charge, unless the charge falls within one of three enumerat - ed exceptions. The exceptions to Rhode Island’s right to bail are: 1. Offenses punishable by imprison - ment for life; 2. Offenses involving the use or threat of use of a dangerous weapon by one already convicted of such offense or already convicted of an offense punishable by imprisonment for life; or 3. Offenses involving the unlawful sale, LLC distribution, manufacture, delivery, PELLCORP INVESTIGATIVE GROUP, or possession with intent to manu - facture, sell, distribute or deliver any Private Investigations controlled substance or by posses - sion of a controlled substance pun - ishable by imprisonment for ten (10) Edward F. Pelletier III, CEO years or more. These three serious offenses are never (401) 965-9745 charged as misdemeanors in District Court. Therefore, all Rhode Island mis - www.pellcorpinvestigativegroup.com demeanor defendants have a constitution - al right to be released on bail, and detain -
8 May/June 20 14 Rhode Island Bar Journal ing them without bail violates that right. In Mello v. Superior Court , 370 A.2d 1262 (R.I. 1978), the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that, although a defendant is entitled to bail in the first instance under the Rhode Island Consti- tution, bail may be revoked and a defen - dant held without bail if a condition of bail is violated. However, the Court held that, before bail may be revoked, the due process “rights afforded defendants in Wills & Trusts [parole and probation revocation hear - ings or in imposition of a suspended sen - tence] must attach to a defendant in a Estate Tax Planning bail revocation proceeding.” 3 The Court cited O’Neill v. Sharke y, 268 A.2d 720 Estate Settlements (R.I. 1970), which held that a defendant at a probation revocation hearing has a Trusts for Disabled Persons right to counsel, to be heard in his defense, and to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him. These fundamental Personal Injury Settlement Trusts due process rights must be afforded a Anthony R. Mignanelli defendant prior to revoking his bail and Attorney At Law All Probate Matters holding him without bail. But, in the context of a pre-bail revocation hearing detention, a defendant is held without bail without being afforded these rights. Affording a misdemeanor defendant the Attorney to Attorney Consultations / Referrals rights guaranteed him in Mello at a hear - ing subsequent to the two week detention is too late, since he has already been sig - 10 Weybosset Street, Suite 205 56 Wells Street nificantly deprived of his liberty at a time Providence, RI 02903 Westerly, RI 02891 when the “presumption of innocence [is] T 401-455-3500 F 401-455-0648 T 401-315-2733 F 401-455-0648 still attached.” 4 Because the presumption of innocence is still attached, detention pending a bail revocation hearing is www.mignanelli.com starkly different from detention pending a probation violation hearing. An alleged The R.I. Supreme Court Licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law. probation violator may be held for two The court does not license or certify any lawyer as an expert or specialist in any field of practice. weeks pending a violation hearing pur - suant to statute .5 However, probation is only imposed after a plea of guilty or nolo contendere , or after a trial on the merits. In contrast, conditions of bail are imposed merely upon the as yet untested allegations of a prosecuting police officer. Therefore, the due process protections of an alleged bail violator should be signifi - There’s only one ... cantly higher than the protections afforded an alleged probation violator. Further, the current practice of pre-bail RI Zoning Handbook, 2d revocation hearing detention contravenes by Roland F. Chase, Esq. established bail guidelines, as a bail deter - • Completely revised • 340 pages • Comprehensive text-and-footnote mination “should be the result of an indi - analysis of Rhode Island zoning law, plus federal zoning law (new!) • Kept vidualized decision, taking into account up to date with annual supplements • Table of Cases • Table of Statutes the special circumstances of each defen - • Exhaustive index • $80.00 plus $5.60 tax • No shipping charge for pre- dant.” 6 The need for an individualized paid orders. Further information and order form at www.rizoning.com. assessment is also grounded in the con sti - Chase Publications, Box 3575, Newport, RI 02840 tutional requirement of due process .7 When a defendant is brought to court to
Rhode Island Bar Journal May/June 20 14 9 be arraigned on an alleged bail violation, it is considered routine to hold the defen - dant without bail for two weeks. The standard, customary nature of pre-bail revocation hearing detention precludes the arraignment judge from considering the “special circumstances of each defen - dant,” and infects the bail process with legal and constitutional error. In Mello , the Rhode Island Supreme Court addressed a situation factually similar to the situation described above. The defendant in Mello was held for two weeks without bail pending a bail revo - cation hearing. The Court responded by holding that “a revocation hearing is sub - ject to the same requirements as a bail hearing in the first instance…. [A] defen - dant awaiting a revocation hearing still has the right to a speedy determination of his status.” 8 Further, the Court held that “[a] bail revocation hearing must be con - ducted with the same promptness as a hearing in the first instance,” and “ a 2- week delay, absent a defendant’s consent, is not to be countenanced .” 9 (emphasis added) This passage seems to hold that a bail revocation hearing is subject to the same prompt presentment requirements
StrategicPoint is an independent investment advisory rm serving the Rhode Island community for more than 20 years.
Providence & We can help your clients manage their nances resulting from: East Greenwich t4FUUMFNFOUTGSPN1FSTPOBM*OKVSZ-BXTVJUTPS%JWPSDF 1-800-597-5974 t1SPCBUF3FTPMVUJPOT StrategicPoint.com
t&TUBUF*OIFSJUBODF Managing Directors: t.FEJDBM.BMQSBDUJDF4FUUMFNFOUT Richard J. Anzelone, JD Betsey A. Purinton, CFP®
StrategicPoint Investment Advisors, LLC is a federally registered investment advisor and is aliated with StrategicPoint Securities, LLC, a federally registered broker-dealer and FINRA/SIPC member.
10 May/June 20 14 Rhode Island Bar Journal for a bail hearing in the first instance, as set forth in Rule 9 of the District Court Rules of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, the defendant needs to be brought before a magistrate or judge for a bail revocation hearing at the next session of the criminal court. This means no more than an over- night detention, or at most over a week - Certified Public Accountants & Business Consultants end, is permissible prior to the revocation hearing .10 At the very least, the above pas - Our Experienced Partners Have Expertise sage from Mello explicitly holds that the in the Following Areas : current practice of automatically detain - w Business Valuations ing a defendant for two weeks pending a Buy/Sell Agreements and Negotiations bail revocation hearing is impermissible. w w Divorce Taxation and Litigation Support Arguments in Favor of Pre-Bail w Estate and Gift Planning and Returns Revocation Hearing Detention w Forensic Accounting and Fraud Examination Under Rhode Island’s constitutional w Mediation right to bail, and because of the due pro- w Succession and Exit Planning cess rights guaranteed defendants facing bail revocation as explained in Mello , the Richard A. Kaplan, CPA, J D, ABV - Accredited in Business Valuation, rkaplan @yksmcpa.com current practice of subjecting defendants Paul E. Moran, CPA, CGMA, ADR, PFS - Alternate Dispute Resolution, pmoran @yksmcpa.com to a two week pre-bail revocation hearing Jon R. Almeida, CPA, CFE - Certified Fraud Examiner, jalmeida @ksmcpa.com detention is ripe for challenge. However, there are practical countervailing argu - ments in favor of the current practice. The 27 Dryden Lan e, Providence, RI 02904 w 56 Wells Street, Westerl y, RI 028 91 foremost practical consideration in favor phone 401 273 1800 fax 401 3 31 0946 www.yksmcpa.com
continued on page 38
Rhode Island Bar Journal May/June 20 14 11 Rhode Island Publish and Bar Founda tion Prosper in t he Rhode Island Founded in 1958, the Rhode Island Bar Foundation is the non-profit philanthropic arm of the state’s legal profession. Its mission is to foster Bar Journal and maintain the honor and integrity of the legal profession and to study, improve and facilitate the administration of justice. The Foundation receives support from members of the Bar, other foundations, and from The Rhode Island Bar Journal honorary and memorial contributions. is one of the Bar Association’s Today, more than ever, the Foundation faces great challenges in funding its best means of sharing your good works, particularly those that help low-income and disadvantaged knowledge and experience people achieve justice. Given this, the Foundation needs your support and with your colleagues. Every invites you to complete and mail this form, with your contribution to the year, attorney authors offer Rhode Island Bar Foundation. information and wisdom, Help Our Bar Foundation through scholarly articles, Help Others commentaries, book reviews, and profiles, to over 6,000 subscribers in Rhode Island RHODE ISLAND BAR FOUN DATION GIFT and around the United States. PLEASE PRINT In addition to sharing valuable My enclosed gift in the amount of $ ______in sights, authors are recog - Please accept this gift in my name nized by readers as authorities or in their field and, in many In Memory of ______cases, receive Contin uing or Legal Education (CLE) credit In Honor of ______for their published pieces . The
Your Name(s) ______Bar Journal ’s Article Selection
Address ______Criteria appear on page 4 of
City /Stat e/Zip ______every Bar Journal and on the Phone (in case of questions) ______Bar’s website at Email: ______www.ribar.com.
Please mail this form and your contribution to: Aspiring authors and pre - Rhode Island Bar Foundation vious contributors are encour - 115 Cedar Street aged to contact the Rhode Providence, RI 02903 Island Bar Journal ’s Editor Frederick Massie by tele - Questions? Please contact Virginia Caldwell at 421-6541 phone: (401) 421-5740 or or gcaldwell @ribar.com email: [email protected] .
12 May/June 20 14 Rhode Island Bar Journal TRIBUTE Stephen R. Famiglietti, Esq.
Rhode Island Attorney Stephen R. Famiglietti, 66, of Lincoln passed away peace - fully at home on December 29, 2013. Stephen was the husband of Susan Marcotte Famiglietti, Esq., and the son of Angela Nardolillo and the late Vittorio Rocco Famiglietti. He was the brother of Marianne Ferraresi and the late Paul V. Famiglietti. He was a graduate of St. Ann’s School, LaSalle Academy, Providence College and Suffolk University Law School in Boston. Stephen was admitted to the Volunteer Lawyer Program Rhode Island Bar in 1972. He was also admitted to the Bar of the United States Receives Grant and Gifts in and the District Court for the District of Rhode Island. Additionally, he was a Attorney Famiglietti’s Memory: member of the Rhode Island Trial Lawyers Association, The Association of Trial Commemorative Reception Lawyers of America and the American Bar Association. on May 15, 20 14
Following law school, Stephen served as law clerk for the Honorable William E. The Batchelor Foundation, Inc., a Powers, Associate Justice of the Rhode Island Supreme Court. He also served with charitable non-profit organization head - distinction as a Prosecutor in the Rhode Island Department of the Attorney General. quartered in Miami Beach, Florida, made Later, he co-founded and was a partner in the law firm of Famiglietti & Carlin a grant of $ 10,000 to the Rhode Island where he engaged in civil litigation and criminal defense. Bar Association’s Volunteer Lawyer Stephen was an accomplished lawyer who tried many celebrated cases including Program (VLP) in honor and memory of State v. Claus von Bulo w. He was appointed to the Rhode Island Select Commission Stephen R. Famiglietti, Esq. The VLP also to Investigate the Failure of Rhode Island Share and Deposit Indemnity Corporation received many generous donations from (RISDIC) -Insured Institutions and served on the Rhode Island Ethics Commission. Stephen’s family, friends and colleagues friends. He was presented with the UNITAM award for “outstanding contribution to Acknowledging the generosity of the mankind and in honor of his Italian-American Heritage” and was recognized by Batchelor Foundation and the individual the Suffolk University Law School Alumni Association for “his dedicated public donations, the Bar’s Volunteer Lawyer service and for leadership in the pursuit of excellence in the legal community.” Program is hosting a commemorative Stephen was noted for his courtroom skills, passion, quick-wittedness and street reception to honor Attorney Stephen R. wise charm. He enjoyed reading, cooking, singing, New York City, the Yankees Famiglietti and highlighting the dedication and celebrating with family and friends. He was a gregarious man with a big heart of VLP attorneys on Thursday, May 15, and an easy spirit of adventure. Stephen was considered unique by many of his 20 14 from 4:30 to 6:30 pm, at the Rhode friends and family. Island Bar Association, on 115 Cedar Street, in Providence. Upon his passing, both the Rhode Island House of Representatives and the Senate According to Rhode Island Bar Associ - passed resolutions expressing the Rhode Island General Assembly’s “deepest a tion President, J. Robert Weisberger, condolences.” “Every year, over 1,000 of our poorest cit - He was the son-in-law of Gabrielle Marcotte, brother-in-law of Daniel Ferraresi, izens receive critically-needed information Joyce Famiglietti, Charles L. and Patricia Marcotte, Lisa Marcotte-Costa, Michael and access to justice through our Bar’s and Lori Longtin and Michael and Beth McLoughlin. He is survived by his nieces Volunteer Lawyer Program. Stephen and nephews: Kristine and John Toic, Paul Famiglietti, Anthony, Stephen and represented the highest standards of Nicholas Ferraresi, Charles H. and Kerri Marcotte, Joseph H. Marcotte, Ashley our profession, and we know he would Longtin and Dave Delahunt, Shane McLoughlin, Robert Longtin, Mathew Costa, appreciate the fact that these gifts to Anne McLoughlin and Gabrielle Costa; grandniece Vanessa Toic; grandnephews our Volunteer Lawyer Program will go Alexander Toic and Zachary Marcotte; two aunts, Mary “Mimi” Nardolillo and to subsidize the litigation costs and Jenny Nicastro; an uncle, Guy Lancellotti; and many cousins including his expenses of individuals in the greatest “brother” Guy Lancellotti, MD . need of pro bono representation .”
Rhode Island Bar Journal May/June 20 14 13 Your Bar’s Lawyer Referral Service Builds Your Practice!
The Rhode Island Bar Association’s Lawyer Referral Service (LRS) is an excellent and inexpensive way for attorneys to build their practice. LRS connects clients who contact the Bar directly to participating attorneys based on their areas of practice and geographic location. And, members of the public who are looking for a lawyer are regularly directed to the Bar’s Lawyer Referral Service by Bar staff fielding telephone inquiries, through the Bar’s web site, and by the Rhode Island courts.
> LRS provides nearly 600 referrals per month! > Annual LRS membership fee is only $100, prorated accordingly for new members and during the year. > Free, six-month membership for new lawyers practicing 2 years or less. For Lawyer Referral Service information, please > Option to participate in a number of outstanding, public contact: Susan Fontaine, Public Services Director service-oriented programs including: by telephone: 401-421-7799 or email: > The Reduced-Fee Program for clients unable to pay regular sfontaine @ribar.com established attorney fees. > Legal Information and Referral Service for the Elderly a You may also sign-up for LRS online. Just go to regular fee, reduced fee and pro bono program for clients the Bar’s website at www.ribar.com , then, in the 60 years or older. top left menu, click on the words: MEMBERS > Lawyers for the Arts regular fee, reduced fee and pro bono ONL Y, and, after logging in, click on Lawyer legal assistance to artists and art-related organizations. Referral Service.
127 Dorrance S treet VIRT UAL LEGAL All Inclusive Class A Office Space ASSISTANT
Absolutely beautiful Multiple individual offices Full service offices include Do you occasionally need extra help? professional office available in different Utilities, Receptionist, Heat, space located at sizes. Large Conference Electric, Cox Internet, Copier Legal secretary and administrative 127 Dorrance Street, room with library and and Fax. Rents range from assistant with 30 years experience Providence (Directly Palladian windows. $475 month to $750 month now offering virtual support to the next door to the Interior glass windows (all inclusive) depending on Rhode Island legal community: Garrahy Courthouse). throughout office. size of office. (4 01 ) 580-4 511 • General document preparation & editing of correspondence & all legal documents, including contracts, estate planning documentation, briefs and memoranda as well as court filings in all State courts
• Schedule management and meeting planning services
• Database entry
121 Brayton Avenue Prompt, confidential & high quality Cranston, Rhode Island 02920 assistance without the unnecessary Tel: 4 01-439-9023 expense of hiring additional staff.
Email kareng57 @cox.net to discuss your needs.
14 May/June 20 14 Rhode Island Bar Journal Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Amendments on the Horizon
Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure at the Duke Conference – the so-called “Duke – the procedural rules that govern the life of a Rules Package.” The Duke Rules Package con - case in the federal trial courts – are on the hori - tains a comprehensive proposal to amend Rules zon. On June 3, 2013, the Standing Committee 4, 16, 26, 30, 31, 33, 34, 36, and 37 of the on Rules of Practice and Procedure (Standing Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Additionally, Committee) approved a report for publication the Civil Rules Advisory Committee’s Discovery containing proposed amendments to the Federal Subcommittee proposed revisions to Rule 37(e), Rules of Civil Procedure (Report). On August seeking to modify the use of sanctions for 15, 2013, the Report was released to the bench e-discovery violations by adopting a uniform and bar for a six month public comment peri - standard for spoliation. od, including a series of public hearings held in A. The Duke Rules Package – Proposed Washington, D.C. , Phoenix, Arizona, and Dallas, Stephen J. MacGillivray, Esq. Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Texas. The public comment period was initially Edwards Wildman Palmer, Procedure 4, 16, 26, 30, 31, 33, 34, 36, and 37. scheduled to close on February 15, 2014. LL P, Providence 1. Rule 4(m) – Service of Summons and If approved by the Standing Committee, the Complaint proposed amendments will be submitted to the Proposed Rule 4(m) shortens the time to Judicial Conference with a recommendation for serve the summons and complaint after filing approval, who, in turn, submits the proposals from 120 days to 60 days. This proposal stems to the Supreme Court. If approved by the from the perception that the early stages of Supreme Court, Congress has seven months litigation take too long. Like the present rule, to approve or reject the new rules. The revised the court may repeatedly extend the time for rules would be officially promulgated on or service upon a showing of good cause. before May 1, 2015, and take effect on or after December 1, 2015. 2. Rule 16(b)(2) – Timing of Scheduling If approved, the proposed changes will have Order a significant impact on practice in the federal Under the current version of Rule courts. The changes are designed to promote 16(b)(2), the district judge must issue a schedul - Raymond M. Ripple, Esq. early case management, streamline discovery, ing order within the earlier of 120 days after Edwards Wildman Palmer, and advance cooperation among the parties. any defendant has been served or 90 days after LL P, Providence What follows is a summary of the proposed any defendant has appeared. The proposed changes reflected in the Report, a consideration amendment to Rule 16(b)(2) cuts these times of their rationale, and a discussion of the reac - to 90 days after any defendant is served or 60 tion thus far. days after any defendant appears. By reducing these time frames, the drafters again seek to The proposed rules I. Summary of the Proposed Amendments reduce the down-time associated with the early For many years, courts and litigants have stages of federal court litigation. should be moni - recognized the escalating cost of discovery 3. Rule 16(b)(1)(B) – Scheduling Conference and pre-trial practice in federal civil litigation. tored through the The proposed amendment to Rule In May 2010, a conference was held at Duke 16(b)(1)(B) authorizes the issuance of a schedul - remainder of the University Law School (Duke Conference) to ing order after receiving the parties’ Rule 26(f) discuss ideas and proposals designed to reduce rule-making process report or after consulting “at a scheduling con - the cost and delay of civil litigation. Although ference.” A conference may no longer be held so litigants are numerous ideas were considered, the main by “telephone, mail, or other means.” Thus, it themes emerging were proportionality in properly prepared appears conferences are still not required, but, discovery, cooperation among lawyers, and if the court conducts a scheduling conference for these changes. early and active judicial case management. The under the proposed rules, it must do so in majority of the present proposed changes to the person with counsel. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were generated
Rhode Island Bar Journal May/June 20 14 15 4. Rule 16(b)(3), Rule 26(f) – Contents of Scheduling Order The proposed amendment to Rule 16(b)(3) provides that additional subjects may be included in the court’s initial scheduling order. Under the proposed rule, a scheduling order and discovery plan would be permitted to include pro - Florida visions for the preservation of electroni - cally stored information and agreements Legal Assistance Statewide reached under Rule 502 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Additionally, a sched - uling order could “direct that before moving for an order relating to discovery Edmund C. Sciarretta, Esq. the movant must request a conference with the court.” The proposal, however, Suffolk Law 1970 stops short of mandating all scheduling orders contain such a provision. This change effectively adopts the practice that is now a local rule in many federal courts PERSONAL INJURY throughout the country. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION 5. Rule 26(b)(1) – Proportionality in Discovery REAL ESTATE CLOSINGS • TITLE INSURANCE The proposal to amend Rule 26(b)(1) introduces the concept of pro - PROBATE ADMINISTRATION portionality in discovery. Rule 26(b)(1) provides the general scope of civil discov - PROBATE LITIGATION ery in federal courts. The current version • of the rule provides that unless the court MARITAL & FAMILY LAW GUARDIANSHIP orders otherwise, a party may obtain BANKRUPTCY • CRIMINAL LAW discovery “regarding any non-privileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense – including the exis - tence, description, nature, custody, condi - Sciarretta & Mannino tion, and location of any documents or other tangible things and the identity and Attorneys at Law location of persons who know of any discoverable matter.” The rule also states that relevant information does not have 7301A West Palmetto Park Road • Suite 305C to be admissible at trial, so long as “the Boca Raton, Florida 33433 discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible 1-800 -749-9928 • 561/338-9900 evidence.” The proposed amendments to Rule 26(b)(1) significantly alter these standards. First, Rule 26 would be amended to pro - vide that discovery must be “proportion - al to the needs of the case considering the amount in controversy, the importance All-Inclusive Class A O ffice Space of the issues at stake in the action, the parties’ resources, the importance of 51 Jefferson Blvd, Warwick, RI discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely Gorgeous professional office space located at benefit.” Second, the proposed amend - 51 Jefferson Boulevard, Warwick, RI in an existing law office. ment removes the language allowing dis - Individual offices are available in different sizes. covery of relevant but inadmissible infor - Includes conference rooms, receptionist, utilities, heat, electric, mation, so long as it appears reasonably copier, library, secretarial workstations, and more. calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Courts and litigants Telephone: (4 01) 7 81-4200 frequently rely on this language to justify a broad scope of discovery simply because
16 May/June 20 14 Rhode Island Bar Journal it is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. If the proposed amendment is adopted, pre - sumably such reliance would no longer YYoou wwaant it. be permissible. As important, the courts would have broad power to limit discov - ery in actions involving smaller amounts in controversy or where the parties have WWee haavve it. limited resources. 6. Rule 26(d)(2) – Early Requests Guardian Disability Income Insurance for Production 10% discount to RI Bar Members The proposed amendment to Rule 26(d)(2) permits a party to serve requests for production of documents under Rule As a legal professionassional, you may have begun to thinkink you'd never be able 34 before the parties conduct their Rule to find the kind of high-quality disability income coverage you need. 26(f) Conference. However, the thirty- Coverage that includes: day time period for responding to this discovery would not commence until efit paymayments when you can't work at your own occupation - the parties conduct their Rule 26(f) even if you can work at another one Conference. -cancellable and guaranteed renewabewable to age 65 verr off premiums during disabilityity benefit period 7. Rules 30, 31, 33, and 36 – Presumptive Numerical Limits If this soundnds like the kind of disability protectionction you've been to Discovery ORRNLQJIRU DQG \RX¶G OLNH WR GLVFXVV \RXU RSWLRQV RU MXVW OHDUQ The proposed amendments seek to more about it, please call: reduce the limits of certain types of dis - covery included in the current version of Robberert J. Gallagher & Associates, Inc. the rules. The amendments propose the A Reprreseesentative of Guardian following new limits on depositions and Robert J. Gallagher, Jr., CLU, ChChFC written discovery: Aggeent • Depositions: The presumptive limit P.O. Box 154467 would be reduced to 5 depositions Riverside, RI 02915 total. The presumptive length of 401-431-0837 a deposition would be limited in rrjgiggs@[email protected] duration to 1 day of 6 hours. • Interrogatories: The presumptive limit would be reduced to 15 inter - rogatories. • Requests for Admission: A presump- tive limit of 25 requests would be
added to the rules. Currently, there is no limit. Requests to admit the Disability income products underwritten and issued by genuineness of documents would Berkshire Life Insurance Company of America, Pittsfield, MA a wholly owned stock subsidiary of not be subject to the new limit. The Guardian Life insurance Company of America, (Guardian) New York, NY. Products not available in all states. Product provisions and features may very from state to state 8. Rule 34 – Objections and Responses to Requests for Production The proposed amendment adds two new concepts to Rule 34. First, Rule 34(b)(2)(B) would require the grounds for objecting to a request are stated with specificity. Second, Rule 34(b)(2)(C) would require that an objection “state whether any responsive materials are being withheld on the basis of that objec - tion.” Vague objections or those which do not state whether documents have been withheld would be prohibited under the proposed rules. B. Proposed Revisions to Rule 37(e) ! In revising Rule 37(e), the Civil Rules " #" $%! &'()* ++',++-( &'()* ++',++-( Advisory Committee’s objective is to .!" / . /
Rhode Island Bar Journal May/June 20 14 17 replace the differing treatment of preser - vation obligations and sanctions in feder - al circuits throughout the country with a uniform standard. Under the amended rule, a court may order curative measures such as permitting additional discovery NO FIRM IS TOO SMALL or ordering a party to pay the reasonable FOR A COMPREHENSIVE AND attorney’s fees and expenses caused by AFFORDABLE RETIREMENT PLAN. the failure to retain the discoverable information. However, sanctions for failing to preserve are available only in situations where the loss of information “irreparably deprived a party of any meaningful opportunity to present or defend against the claims in the litiga - tion,” or where the failure to preserve was willful or in bad faith and caused substantial prejudice in the litigation. Accordingly, a negligence standard for sanctions relating to spoliation of evidence is explicitly rejected. This new standard is contrary to certain high profile spoliation standards that have emerged in recent years, including the negligence standard adopted by in The ABA RETIREMENT FUNDS PROGRAM has provided Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Fin. Corp. , 306 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2002). retirement plan services to firms of all sizes – even solo Proposed Rule 37(e) also would remove practitioners – since 1963. We believe today, as we did then, any reliance by a court on its “inherent that the unique needs of the legal community are best served by powers” to sanction a party for spolia - tion of evidence. a retirement Program built exclusively to benefit its members. Under the proposed rule, even where the standard for sanctions has not been Call an ABA Retirement Funds Program Regional Representative today! established, a court still would have the (866) 812-1510 I www.abaretirement.com I [email protected] ability to order curative measures such as permitting additional discovery or ordering a party to pay the reasonable Please visit the ABA Retirement Funds Booth at the upcoming attorney’s fees and expenses caused by Rhode Island Bar Association Annual Meeting for a free cost the failure to retain the discoverable V«>ÀÃÊ>`Ê«>ÊiÛ>Õ>Ì°ÊÕiÊ£Óä]ÊÓä£{ÊUÊ, `iÊ Island Convention Center, Providence, RI information. The scope of this provision is unclear.
The Program is available through the Rhode Island Bar Association as a member benefit. This communication shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of Notably, unlike the current version an offer to buy, or a request of the recipient to indicate an interest in, and is not a recommendation of any security. of Rule 37(e), the proposed Rule 37(e) Securities offered through ING Financial Advisers, LLC (Member SIPC). The ABA Retirement Funds Program and ING Financial Advisers, LLC, are separate, unaffiliated companies and are not responsible for one another’s products and applies to all types of discoverable infor - services. CN0228-8312-0315 mation and not just electronically stored information. A complete list of the proposed amend - ments, as well as the Report of the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, is available at http://www.uscourts.gov/ uscourts/rules/preliminary-draft- ––––– Consulting, Administration, and Actuarial Services for Qualified Retirement Plans ––––– proposed-amendments.pdf.
II. Reaction to the Proposed • Divorce Litigation Support for Pensions Amendments • 401(k) Design Specialists The proposed amendments have received a mixed and highly contentious • Defined Benefit and Cash Balance Plan Administration response from the public .1 Although many commentators are concerned about the Jeffrey A. Brown JD, LLM, QPA, ChFC, ERPA Grant E. Brown QPA, TGPC, ERPA, CFP® presumptive numerical limits on written discovery and depositions, as well as the 67 Jefferson Blvd. | Warwick, RI 02888 | (401) 223-5555 | www.CompPlanning.com shorter presumptive time period a party
18 May/June 20 14 Rhode Island Bar Journal will have to conduct a deposition, the most heated debate has focused on the concept of proportionality and the new standard for spoliation. Generally, self-described plaintiff’s lawyers and groups concerned about access to the courts have expressed con - cern over the new rules addressing pro - portionality and whether they will unfair - ly limit a litigant’s ability to obtain the necessary discoverable information to prepare for trial. Additionally, commenta - tors have expressed concern over the pro - posed amendment to Rule 37(e) because it shifts the burden to the innocent party to explain why missing information irreparably deprives it of a “meaningful opportunity to present or defend against the claims in the litigation.” Some com - mentators have expressed the opinion that willfulness and bad faith are too high a standard to determine whether sanctions are warranted for a loss of dis - coverable information. These concerns are amplified by the fact that these changes follow the U.S. Supreme Court rulings in Iqbal and Twombl y, which Workers’ Compensation these groups view as limiting the ability of plaintiff to sue corporations. Others see the proposed changes as Injured at Work? an appropriate response to the immense growth of electronically stored informa - tion and the burdens that our traditional - Accepting referrals for workers’ ly broad discovery rules place on entities that produce it. They feel the e-discovery compensation matters. system has not worked to achieve the purpose of allowing the litigants to obtain information that is going to help the trier of fact. These commentators note that a country-wide uniform standard Call Stephen J. Dennis Today! for spoliation would curtail the dramatic unnecessary expense associated with 1-888-634 -1543 or 1-40 1-453 -1355 over-preservation. Because the proposed amendments are preliminary and still subject to public comment, it remains unclear to what extent the proposed amendments will be modified before becoming final. It is clear, however, that the proposed rules, at least in their current form, are a sig - MARK A. PFEIFFER nificant revision to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The proposed rules Alternative Dispute Resolution Services should be monitored through the remain - ww w.mapfeiffe r.com der of the rule-making process so litigants are properly prepared for these changes. Bringing over four decades of experience as a Superior Court judge, financial services industry regulato r, senior banking office r, private ENDNOTES 1 Comments are publicly available at attorne y, arbitrato r, mediato r, receive r, and court appointed special http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=USC master to facilitate resolution of legal disputes. -RULES-CV-2013-0002. O ARBITR ATION MEDI ATION PRI VA TE TRIAL (4 01) 253-3430 / adr @mapfeiffe r.com / 86 State St., Bristol, RI 02809
Rhode Island Bar Journal May/June 20 14 19
EXPER IENCED, THO ROUG HLY PREPARED & SUCCESSFUL TRIAL ATTORNEY
Since 1 984 , I ha ve be e n rep rese nting p eop le who have be en ph ysic all y and e m otionally harm ed due t o the cri m inal a c ts or neg ligenc e of oth er s. I have o bta i ned nu m e rous million do llar plus tria l ve rdict s and m an y more se ttlem e nts fo r vi ct im s o f b irth injury, cere bral p als y , m e dica l malp ra ctic e, wro ngf ul d eath, tru cking and con struction a ccidents. Cou ntin g crim in al and civ i l ca se s, I have b een lead cou n sel in o ver 1 0 0 j ur y trial verdicts.
My 12 year s of working in 3 differ ent prosecutors’ offices (Manhattan 1982-84; Mia m i 1 984-8 8, R.I.A .G . 1 988 -9 4) h as led to my endur ing com mit men t t o s eek justice.
I w elcom e yo ur referrals . M y case load is exceptio nally s mall. I do a nd wil l cont inu e to per so nal ly ha ndle e ver y aspect o f your clien t’s medic al m alpr actice or s erious per so nal injury ca se f rom b e gin ning to end.
THE LAW OFFI CE OF D AVID M OR OW ITZ, LTD.
Board Certified in Civil Trial Advocacy by the National Board of Trial Advocacy*
www.morowitzlaw.com
155 SOUTH MAIN ST., SUITE 304, PROVIDENCE, RI 02903 (401) 274- 5 556 (4 01) 27 3-8543 FAX
I am never too busy to prom ptly return all phon e cal ls from clients and attorneys.
*The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law.
The Court does not license or certify any lawyer as an expert or specialist in any particular field of practice.
20 May/June 20 14 Rhode Island Bar Journal