Phoebe Rogers Director: Olivia Ott

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phoebe Rogers Director: Olivia Ott asdf OPEC Chair: Phoebe Rogers Director: Olivia Ott OPEC PMUNC 2016 Contents Letter from the Chair…….………………………...……………………...3 Committee Description………………………….…………………….…….…………….4 Topic A: Raising Prices.…..…..………………….....……………..……….6 Introduction…..………………………………….……………………….……..…………6 History of the Topic………………………..…………………………..….…….…………7 Current Status…………………………………….………………...…….……...………...10 Country Policy…...………………………………………………..…….………………....14 Keywords……………………………………....……………….........…………….…..…..16 Questions for Consideration………..…………….……………….........…….……….…....17 Topic B: Swing Production ……......…………………..…………………19 Introduction……..…………………..………...……………………………………..……19 History of the Topic.…………………….….…….…....…………..………………...……20 Current Status………………………….……….………………………………………....22 Country Policy.….…………………...….……….……...…..……………………………..26 Keywords……………………………….…………….……………………………….......27 Questions for Consideration............……….…….…….…………………..……………….28 Bibliography……………….……………………………………………………………..29 2 OPEC PMUNC 2016 Letter from the Chair Dear Delegates, My name is Phoebe Rogers, and I am part of the Princeton class of 2019. I am majoring in Economics, and pursuing a minor in Computer Science. This will be my first year chairing PMUNC, and I am very excited to be a part of PMUNC 2016! I began Model UN my sophomore year of high school, and this is my second year as part of the Princeton MUN Team. On campus, besides MUN, I am a member of Envision and work for Rocky-Mathey Dining Services. Last summer I interned at Veritas Technologies, and I am interested in continuing to work in the tech industry in the future. I am fascinated by the intersection of economics and technology. As for my personal life, I am originally from Eugene, Oregon. When I’m not studying I love skiing, backpacking, hiking, kayaking, and biking. And of course, preparing for this amazing committee. I look forward to seeing you all at the conference in November! I hope you are all coming excited to be working together on resolving the issues facing OPEC, and understanding more about how these oil extracting giants form decisions. Sincerely, Phoebe Rogers 3 OPEC PMUNC 2016 Committee Description OPEC, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, is an international body of some of the world’s prominent oil-exporting countries. Its official mission is to, “coordinate and unify the petroleum policies of its member countries and ensure the stabilization of oil markets in order to secure an efficient, economic and regular supply of petroleum to consumers, a steady income to producers and a fair return on capital for those investing in the petroleum industry.”1 All decisions regarding the organization are made in OPEC Conferences, where delegations from each member country are typically headed by their respective oil minister. These conferences are held twice a year on average at the Vienna headquarters2, but additional sessions may be called when necessary. All members of OPEC have, for the most part, a vote of equal weight in the decision making process for the organization, because all members pay equal membership fees into the annual budget. The decisions made at these meetings often concern production levels and oil prices, but any and all changes occurring in the organization are also discussed in these meetings. OPEC was created in September of 1960 at the Baghdad Conference by five Founding Members: Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela3. These member countries were later joined by Qatar, Indonesia, Libya, United Arab Emirates, Algeria, Nigeria, Ecuador, Angola, and Gabon. Throughout the 1960’s OPEC leaders worked to set the foundation for the organization, establishing its Secretariat in Geneva before moving it to Vienna, and in 1968 adopting a ‘Declaratory Statement of Petroleum Policy in Member Countries’ that stressed, “The inalienable right of all countries to exercise permanent sovereignty over their natural resources in the interest of their national development.”4 1 "Our Mission." OPEC. Accessed June 22, 2016. http://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/about_us/23.htm. 2 “OPEC Meetings.” OPEC. Accessed August 15, 2016. http://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/311.htm 3 “Brief History.” OPEC. Accessed June 22, 2016. http://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/about_us/24.htm. 4 Ibid. 4 OPEC PMUNC 2016 The 1970’s brought OPEC considerable recognition as it rose to become a dominant force in the international oil market. However, turmoil also ensued in the 70’s due to the Arab Oil Embargo of 1973 – and the subsequent international energy crisis – and the Iranian Revolution of 1979, both drastically driving up oil prices5. In 1975 OPEC held the first Summit of Heads of State and Government of its members, calling for increased economic development and stability through cooperation in international relations6. This marked one of the first demonstrations of OPEC’s intent to become a stable, lasting, and globally influential force in the oil market. The early 80’s saw record level prosperity for oil producers until a major price crash began due to falling demand after the 1970’s energy crisis. This crash is the largest crisis that the young oil market has yet faced, and it has primarily been caused by a reaction on the consumer side of the market to the shortage of oil in the previous decade. It is now 1986, the peak of the price crash and the early years of the oil glut, and oil prices have already fallen from $27 to below $10 this year7. The market is in crisis and now is the time for all large global oil producers, and this committee, to take decisive action and enact drastic change. 5 Ibid. 6 Ibid. 7 Hershey Jr., Robert D. "Worrying Anew Over Oil Imports". The New York Times. Published 30 Dec 1989. 5 OPEC PMUNC 2016 Topic A: Raising Prices Introduction Faced with plummeting oil prices, both OPEC and non OPEC producers in the international oil market are in crisis. Prices have dropped to record lows, bottoming out at below $10 per barrel. Without the profits brought in by stable high prices, the economies of oil exporters are suffering. In 1986 daily revenue from oil in Saudi Arabia dipped below 100 million, less than a quarter of the near 400 million that they had been making in 1980-818. Oil represents one of the primary exports of the individual member countries of OPEC, and neither they nor other international oil producers can afford for prices to continue at their current levels. Since the beginning of the oil glut OPEC has done its best to limit its production of oil in order to reduce global supply and thereby raise prices. Unfortunately efforts as of yet have not been successful, and both prices and profits continue to drop. Individually, each major oil producing state (or organization such as OPEC) has been unable to affect significant change in the world market. International producers are desperate to raise prices, and anxious that oil may be losing its standing as the world’s primary energy source. Consumption continues to fall, and new worries have arisen that consumption will inevitably keep declining into perpetuity and never again recover to previous levels. Many, who feel attuned to the markets, believe that the situation is a temporary reaction to the record level high prices of the early 80’s and a lingering result of the energy crisis in the 70’s. US economists have expressed concern that the American public is beginning to believe in lasting low prices, and that once the market levels out again, “The break in prices . may 8 Gately, Dermont. Lessons from the 1986 Oil Price Collapse. New York University, 1986. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 6 OPEC PMUNC 2016 jeopardize many hardwon achievements, such as conservation and sharply reduced dependence on OPEC oil.”9 Whatever the cause of the glut, apathy is not an option. OPEC, alongside other international producers, are compelled to lower oil supply and increase prices if they hope to maintain the economic advantages and political influence that being at the forefront of a major global market like oil has afforded them. History of the Topic Long standing tensions between the Middle East and the West flared during the Arab- Israeli War in 1973, during which the United States supported and supplied Israel. This resulted in the Arab members of OPEC imposing an embargo against the US and other countries that supported Israel including the Netherlands, Portugal, and South Africa. Included in the embargo was a ban on the exportation of petroleum to the above nations and the introduction of general oil production cuts in order to raise prices even further10. The embargo primarily affected oil importing countries that heavily depended on affordable OPEC oil, highlighting the world’s increasing dependence on OPEC as an oil producer. At the time, OPEC was the largest producer of oil on the global market.11 As they reduced their production levels throughout the embargo, international oil prices per barrel first doubled and then quadrupled.12 OPEC grew more and more influential as countries with limited oil stockpiles struggled to meet domestic demand, setting the stage for a world where strategic resources, particularly oil, determine leverage on the international playing field. As prices continued to rise and supply dwindled, consumers across the world began to 9 Hershey, Robert D., Jr. "THE DARK SIDE OF THE OIL GLUT." The New York Times, March 21, 1982. http://www.nytimes.com/1982/03/21/business/the-dark-side-of-the-oil-glut.html?pagewanted=all. 10 "Oil Embargo, 1973–1974." Department of State. Accessed June 22, 2016. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/oil-embargo. 11 Ibid. 12 Ibid. 7 OPEC PMUNC 2016 adjust their spending habits. Massive energy shortages in the West led to austerity measures, many of which outlasted the embargo. The establishment of permanent regulations such as speed limits and social movements such as environmentalism accompanied temporary gas price controls and rationing.13 The ingrained consumer caution brought on by the 1973 Oil Embargo and the consequent 1970’s Energy Crisis, combined with record high oil prices, was a major cause of the Oil Glut of the 1980’s.
Recommended publications
  • Oil and Gas News Briefs, April 23, 2020
    Oil and Gas News Briefs Compiled by Larry Persily April 23, 2020 Texas regulators meet May 5 to discuss restrictions on oil output (Reuters; April 21) - Texas state oil and gas regulators in the coming days are poised to decide whether to order larger producers to shut in 20% of their output, wading into global oil politics as the coronavirus crisis slashes demand for crude. The regulators have the authority to limit production — but have not done so in decades. The Texas Railroad Commission, organized in the 1890s to oversee private railroads, grew to encompass other businesses, including oil and gas production and transportation. The commission has a mandate under state law to “prevent waste of the state’s natural resources,” and some producers and one of three elected commissioners argue that the current oversupply of oil and resulting price crash is “economic waste.” They held a hearing last week and are set to meet May 5. The agency first limited output as a way to lift prices after the discovery in the 1930s of the giant East Texas field, which rapidly reached 1 million barrels per day, crashing oil prices from $1.10 to 10 cents per barrel. Shale producers Parsley Energy and Pioneer Natural Resources this month asked the state to consider cutting production 20%, or 1 million barrels per day. The measure has divided the industry in Texas with many of its largest producers and trade organizations opposed and some independent producers in favor. Texas last limited output in the early 1970s, a time when the state’s production started falling into a decades-long decline that eliminated the reason for output caps as it lost market share to other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Intro Pages.Indd
    Strategic Petroleum Reserves for Canada by GordonParkland LaxerInstitute, / UniversityParkland of InstituteAlberta • Octoberand Polaris 2007 Institute Strategic Petroleum Reserves for Canada Strategic Petroleum Reserves for Canada This report was published by Gordon Laxer, Parkland Institute and Polaris Institute January 2008. © All rights reserved. Contents Context: Parkland Institute and Polaris Institute: Canadian Energy Policy Research iii Executive Summary 1 Introduction 4 Canada at Risk 5 Why Strategic Petroleum Reserves? 7 Origins 7 Reasons for Establishing SPRs 8 The U.S. SPR 8 The American SPR - not a solution for Canada 9 International Disruptions: Frequency and Intensity 10 History 12 Oil as a Political Weapon 14 Re-nationalizations and Supply 16 Return of Long-term Contracts 17 Protective Value of SPRs 19 Every Country but Canada 20 Urgent Need for Canadian SPRs 22 OPEC countries dominate Canadian imports 22 Location, Size and Function of Canadian SPRs 23 Size 23 Siting the SPRs 25 Uses of Canadian SPRs 26 Conclusion 27 To obtain additional copies of the report or rights to copy it, please contact: Parkland Institute, University of Alberta 11045 Saskatchewan Drive Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E1 Phone: (780) 492-8558 Fax: (780) 492-8738 Web site: www.ualberta.ca/parkland E-mail: [email protected] ISBN ???? 3i Parkland Institute • January 2008 Acknowledgements It was a great pleasure to write this report and get almost instant feedback on the first draft from a very knowledgeable and committed “epistemic community” of intellectual activists. Together, we are creating a new paradigm for moving Canada toward energy independence and conservation. The quality of this report was greatly enhanced by the detailed suggestions and analysis of Kjel Oslund, Erin Weir, and John Dillon.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerinia Country Report
    ENYCLOPEDIA Azurianica Online The Republic of Gerinia Genenral Gerinia is a constitutional republic situated on the Gulf of Guna, located south of Laloku and east of Letos, spanning an area about 85% the size of France or Texas. Due to its inherent advantages, both in relation to its location and available natural resources, Gerinia is, by far, the wealthiest nation in Southern Azuria and, as a result, is also a prominent player in the regional Matapaturi Union. Flag History Anthem: shlu kom borera Gerinia (Kanobi) The people of Gerinia have an extensive ("We hail thee, Gerinia") history, and archaeological evidence shows that human habitation of the area dates back to at least 9000 BC. Falling Capital Barubu under the control of several regional Largest city Shiban tribal powers, including the Mekalo Official languages English, Kanobi, Gadinu, monarchy (6-9th centuries), the Parunic Xalubo dynasty (10th-14th centuries) and the Taery Empire (15th-19th centuries) the area of modern-day Gerinia remained generally a traditional tribal area for most of modern history. Portuguese explorers were the first Europeans to begin trade in Gerinia, following in the footsteps of Vasco de Gama, who travelled through the area in 1498. However, following the Napoleonic Wars, it was the British who significantly expanded trade with the Gerinian interior. In 1884, a challenge to the British dominance arose when the German Empire claimed the territory as the German colony of Gerinia, and began a steady push inland. However, through primarily diplomatic and economic maneuvering, the British managed to thwart the German plans and in 1885 British claims to Gerinia received international recognition.
    [Show full text]
  • Download From:Aghalibrary.Cm OPEC (ORGANISATION of PETROLEUM EXPORTING COUNTRIES)
    Download from:aghalibrary.cm OPEC (ORGANISATION OF PETROLEUM EXPORTING COUNTRIES) It is a permanent intergovernmental organization. OPEC was formed at a meeting held on September 14, 1960 in Baghdad, Iraq. Consisting of 12 oil producing and exporting countries. Oil is the main marketable commodity and foreign exchange earner. OPEC is currently headquartered at Vienna, Austria. 2 Country Joined OPEC Location Algeria 1969 Africa Angola 2007 Africa Ecuador ** rejoined 2007 South America IR Iran * 1960 Middle East Iraq * 1960 Middle East Kuwait * 1960 Middle East Libya 1962 Africa Nigeria 1971 Africa Qatar 1961 Middle East Saudi Arabia * 1960 Middle East United Arab Emirates 1967 Middle East Venezuela* 1960 South America Ecuador and Gabon were early members of OPEC, but Ecuador withdrew on December 31, 1992 because it was unwilling or unable to pay a $2 million membership fee and felt that it needed to produce more oil than it was allowed to under the OPEC quota, although it rejoined in October 2007 4 OBJECTIVES OF OPEC The organization’s principal objectives are: • To co-ordinate and unify the petroleum policies of the Member Countries and to determine the best means for safeguarding their individual and collective interests. • To seek ways and means of ensuring the stabilization of prices in international oil markets, with a view to eliminating harmful and unnecessary fluctuations. • To provide an efficient economic and regular supply of petroleum to consuming nations and a fair return on capital to those investing in the petroleum industry. 5 MEMBERSHIP “Any country with a substantial net export of crude petroleum, which has fundamentally similar interests to those of Member Countries, may become a Full Member of the Organization, if accepted by a majority of three-fourths of Full Members, including the concurring votes of all Founder Members” 6 It further distinguishes between three categories of membership: Founder Members – those countries which were represented at OPEC's first Conference, held in Baghdad, Iraq, in September 1960.
    [Show full text]
  • Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries
    ORGANIZATION OF PETROLEUM EXPORTING COUNTRIES Russo-Saudi Oil War BACKGROUND GUIDE Letter from the Dais Dear Delegates, Welcome to SciMUNC XIV! With the course of events this past year, we want to thank each and every one of you for partaking in our conference! We are very excited to be your chairs for the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) committee! My name is Anthony Lino and I will be your chair for this year’s committee. Tis is my frst time chairing. I joined Model UN as a sophomore to complement the Krish Shah Speech class I was taking. Tis program, more than anything else, has taught me how to Secretary-General be truly thorough, and the confdence that comes with talking about a subject you know well. I genuinely believe in the program and hope that you learn from this committee. Outside of Model UN, I am a Boy Scout and participate in Science Research studying Byul Sak the Chikungunya virus. I am chairing this committee session because I am interested in Director-General the power plays that are associated with the oil industry and believe it is an integral part of understanding our world. Please pay attention to your research as I believe it can form a foundation for future committees and help you understand the politics of the world. I Omar Darwish look forward to the engaging discussion in this committee. USG of Administration My name is Arian Berisha and I am proud to announce that I will be cochairing our committee for this year’s SciMUNC.
    [Show full text]
  • Object/Preserve%3Lehighreview- Vol-20
    Lehigh Preserve Institutional Repository The Lehigh Review Volume 20 - 2012 2012 Permalink: https://preserve.lib.lehigh.edu/islandora/object/preserve%3lehighreview- vol-20 Find more at https://preserve.lib.lehigh.edu/ This document is brought to you for free and open access by Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact [email protected]. volume 20 THE spring 2012 LEHIGH REVIEW progression and reflection editor in chief staff james suh marketing editor credits sarah strackhouse design editor margaret griffiths facilitator catherine burton staff editors jane givens alyssa pasquini sheron tang cory tucker production with help from special donald hall saladin ambar edurne portelo henri barkey sue shell anna chupa thanks kate crassons design support krista evans jason stanford ben felzer funding betsy fifer the humanities norman girardot center chaim kaufmann jackie krasas printing kevin narizny christmas city james peterson printing co., inc. brian pinaire amber rice roger simon Rhythm Pei Pei Yang 2 THE LEHIGH REVIEW 20 12 3 letter from the editor I am proud to present the twentieth edi- tion of The Lehigh Review: Progression and Reflection. Assembling the journal was both a pleasure and a challenge, and it could not have been possible without the hard work of our staff, featured authors, artists and the help of our faculty support- ers. Their efforts are prominent in this spe- cial twentieth anniversary edition. Under the theme of Progression and Reflec- tion, we continued to evolve our aesthetic language while celebrating The Lehigh Review’s renowned past.
    [Show full text]
  • MARKET UPDATE: CRUDE OIL in the TIME of COVID-19 by Antonia Cicala and Andrea Sala Portfolio Analysts, Minerva IMS Msc in Finance Students, Bocconi
    2/4/2018 Ued-1.d MARKET UPDATE: CRUDE OIL IN THE TIME OF COVID-19 by Antonia Cicala and Andrea Sala Portfolio Analysts, Minerva IMS MSc in Finance Students, Bocconi 04/03/2020 ://de.gge.c/de/fde/17ZII6GXB6JDCAMfYE9UVUcfF9 1/1 OVERVIEW Looking at the WTI historical price, there are sudden climbs and dramatic drawdowns: this is Crude oil can be quite rightly defined as one of the how the asset’s behavior could be summarized and, most volatile commodities and yet among the most for sure, its track would be too scary even for a relevant for its significant impact both on the real rollercoaster addicted. economy and on financial markets. Its fluctuations largely affect the financial statements of the There is one thing we want to focus our attention companies operating in the O&G industry, which on: the historical behavior of WTI. In fact, a contributes nearly 4% of the global economy. In conscious analysis of the present cannot overlook order to better assess what is going on over these at least a little understanding of what drove this days, it may be worth to gain some confidence with security’s insane behavior over the past decades. the key drivers for this asset’s price. Let’s split them More in detail, in this section we will travel through between: (with a complete albeit brief chronological review over the past 70 years) the main shocks this à Supply-side factors: OPEC members’ commodity has undergone. production policies play a fundamental role in driving the price of this commodity under all of its i.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Iranian Oil Company in Iranian Politics
    THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RICE UNIVERSITY THE NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY IN IRANIAN POLITICS BY DANIEL BRUMBERG GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ARIEL I. AHRAM GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY PREPARED IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN ENERGY STUDY SPONSORED BY THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY AND JAPAN PETROLEUM ENERGY CENTER RICE UNIVERSITY – MARCH 2007 THIS PAPER WAS WRITTEN BY A RESEARCHER (OR RESEARCHERS) WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE JOINT BAKER INSTITUTE/JAPAN PETROLEUM ENERGY CENTER POLICY REPORT, THE CHANGING ROLE OF NATIONAL OIL COMPANIES IN INTERNATIONAL ENERGY MARKETS. WHEREVER FEASIBLE, THIS PAPER HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY OUTSIDE EXPERTS BEFORE RELEASE. HOWEVER, THE RESEARCH AND THE VIEWS EXPRESSED WITHIN ARE THOSE OF THE INDIVIDUAL RESEARCHER(S) AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY NOR THOSE OF THE JAPAN PETROLEUM ENERGY CENTER. © 2007 BY THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY OF RICE UNIVERSITY THIS MATERIAL MAY BE QUOTED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION, PROVIDED APPROPRIATE CREDIT IS GIVEN TO THE AUTHOR AND THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY ABOUT THE POLICY REPORT THE CHANGING ROLE OF NATIONAL OIL COMPANIES IN INTERNATIONAL ENERGY MARKETS Of world proven oil reserves of 1,148 billion barrels, approximately 77% of these resources are under the control of national oil companies (NOCs) with no equity participation by foreign, international oil companies. The Western international oil companies now control less than 10% of the world’s oil and gas resource base. In terms of current world oil production, NOCs also dominate.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Financial Crises, and Their Relation to the Oil and Gas Industry”
    MASTER THESIS WITHIN ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION “A study of Financial Crises, and their Relation to the Oil and Gas Industry” Ingrid Schiefloe Spring 2012 DET SAMFUNNSVITENSKAPELIGE FAKULTET, HANDELSHØGSKOLEN VED UIS MASTEROPPGAVE STUDIEPROGRAM: OPPGAVEN ER SKREVET INNEN FØLGENDE SPESIALISERINGSRETNING: Master i Økonomi og Administrasjon Anvendt Finans ER OPPGAVEN KONFIDENSIELL? Nei TITTEL: ”En studie av finanskriser, og deres relasjon til olje og gass industrien” ENGELSK TITTEL: ”A study of Financial Crises, and their Relation to the Oil and Gas Industry” FORFATTER VEILEDER: Studentnummer: Navn: Loran Grady Chollete 212607 Ingrid Schiefloe OPPGAVEN ER MOTTATT I TO – 2 – INNBUNDNE EKSEMPLARER Stavanger, ……/…… 2012 Underskrift administrasjon:…………………………… I Executive Summary This thesis investigates the relationship between the main oil indicators and the probability of a financial crisis. The main oil indicators include oil consumption, oil production and oil price. The financial probability is based on Carmen Reinhart’s BCDI+ index, which is a financial turbulence index, and Robert Barro’s definition of crises based on a cumulative decline in GDP and ‘Consumption’. The methodology used in order to establish a quantitative relationship between the main oil indicators and the probability of a financial crisis is: Poisson regression and Logistic regression. As to the current knowledge, this methodology has not been used before. The first section is a qualitative analysis of the issue, starting with an introduction of financial crises over the last century and the history of the oil and gas industry, subsequently moving on to James Hamilton’s (1983) analysis of its relation to the economy. The section continues with an introduction to Carmen Reinhart’s theory and data from the book ‘This Times is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly’ where the BCDI+ index is explained.
    [Show full text]
  • TOP NEWS Negative $40 Oil Reflects Panic
    TUESDAY, APRIL 21, 2020, U.S. EDITION Click here to access Eikon top news energy page. Click here to read full stories. TOP NEWS Negative $40 oil reflects panic - and U.S. crude market economic reality Traders desperate to avoid owning oil fled the markets on Monday, sending crude futures into negative territory for the first time ever, in recognition that the coronavirus pandemic has sapped demand for fuel and there is not enough storage for the massive glut of oil present on U.S. soil. Investors sold the May futures contract due to expire on Tuesday in a series of waves. At one point the contract hit negative $40. When the trading stopped, crude oil had ended the day at a negative $37.63 a barrel, a decline of some 305%, or $55.90 a barrel. A hunt for any storage space turns urgent as oil glut grows The telephone lines have been ringing at Adler Tank Rentals in Texas as oil companies found a new use for steel tanks that had been left idle when shale producers stopped drilling - they want to use the tanks to store some of an oil glut that has overwhelmed the market and flipped U.S. crude prices negative for the first time. Hundreds of millions of barrels of crude have gushed into storage worldwide in the past two months as the coronavirus-related lockdowns wiped out around a third of global oil demand. Remember the 1980s glut: Ex-BP boss Browne warns oil will stay low The oil price will stay low for some time as supply exceeds demand and the current situation on global oil markets is reminiscent of the 1980s oil glut, former BP boss John Browne said on Tuesday.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a Full PDF of Petroleum and the Environment
    Petroleum and the Environment Edith Allison and Ben Mandler The American Geosciences Institute Petroleum and the Environment Edith Allison and Ben Mandler Petroleum and the Environment Cover photos: clockwise from top-left: Oil Rig, Williston Oil Edith Allison and Ben Mandler Field, North Dakota, Lindsey Gira, CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia ISBN: 978-1721175468 Commons; Alyeska Pipeline at mile 562, Alaska, Copyright © Larry Fellows, Arizona Geological Survey; Los Angeles © 2018 American Geosciences Institute. highways, ©Shutterstock.com/S. Borisov; Petrochemical Published and printed in the United States of America. All Plant, Corpus Christi, Texas, ©Shutterstock.com/Trong rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced Nguyen. Cover background: ©Shutterstock.com/Sergey or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or Nivens. mechanical, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system without the expressed written consent of the publisher. Design by Brenna Tobler, AGI Graphic Designer, and Ben Mandler, AGI Critical Issues Program. For more information on the American Geosciences Institute and its publications, check us out at store. americangeosciences.org. Contact: Ben Mandler, Schlumberger Senior Researcher American Geosciences Institute 4220 King Street, Alexandria, VA 22302 www.americangeosciences.org [email protected] (703) 379-2480, ext. 226 AGI Critical Issues Program: www.americangeosciences.org/critical-issues i Petroleum and the Environment Supported by the AAPG Foundation. © 2018 American Geosciences Institute Written by E. Allison and B. Mandler for AGI, 2018 Acknowledgments This publication benefited from the expertise of many reviewers from different sectors all over the United States. Thank you to our internal AGI reviewers: Allyson Anderson Book, Maeve Boland, Kelly Kryc, and Cassaundra Rose; and to our external review- ers: Donna S.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Rents and Economic Growth: Economic and Institutional Development in Countrieswith a High Share of Income from the Sale of Natural Resources
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Kaznacheev, Peter Research Report Resource Rents and Economic Growth: Economic and institutional development in countrieswith a high share of income from the sale of natural resources. Analysis and recommendations based on international experience Suggested Citation: Kaznacheev, Peter (2013) : Resource Rents and Economic Growth: Economic and institutional development in countrieswith a high share of income from the sale of natural resources. Analysis and recommendations based on international experience, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow, https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/ppaper/kazn01.html This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/121950 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
    [Show full text]