POK Oct 2011
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Constitutional Status of Gilgit Baltistan: Factors and Implications
The Constitutional Status of Gilgit Baltistan: Factors and Implications By Name: Syeda Batool National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad April 2019 1 The Constitutional Status of Gilgit Baltistan: Factors and Implications by Name: Syeda Batool M.Phil Pakistan Studies, National University of Modern Languages, 2019 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY in PAKISTAN STUDIES To FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF PAKISTAN STUDIES National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad April 2019 @Syeda Batool, April 2019 2 NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF MODERN LANGUAGES FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES THESIS/DISSERTATION AND DEFENSE APPROVAL FORM The undersigned certify that they have read the following thesis, examined the defense, are satisfied with the overall exam performance, and recommend the thesis to the Faculty of Social Sciences for acceptance: Thesis/ Dissertation Title: The Constitutional Status of Gilgit Baltistan: Factors and Implications Submitted By: Syed Batool Registration #: 1095-Mphil/PS/F15 Name of Student Master of Philosophy in Pakistan Studies Degree Name in Full (e.g Master of Philosophy, Doctor of Philosophy) Degree Name in Full Pakistan Studies Name of Discipline Dr. Fazal Rabbi ______________________________ Name of Research Supervisor Signature of Research Supervisor Prof. Dr. Shahid Siddiqui ______________________________ Signature of Dean (FSS) Name of Dean (FSS) Brig Muhammad Ibrahim ______________________________ Name of Director General Signature of -
Pok Dec 2014.Cdr
POK Volume 7 | Number 12 | December 2014 News Digest A MONTHLY NEWS DIGEST ON PAKISTAN OCCUPIED KASHMIR Compiled & Edited by Dr Priyanka Singh & Charisma MS Kundan Political Developments GBLA Elections: Summary Forwarded to PM for Election Commissioner's Appointment Gilgit Courts Have no Jurisdiction in Pakistan, Say Experts 'One of Us': G-B Lawyers Threaten Poll Boycott Voice of Dissident: 'Where is the Empowerment Promised?' KP-GB Tension Over Disputed Territory Eases Refreshing Our Faulty Memory: Gilgit-Baltistan and Kashmir Go Hand in Hand G-B CM Slams Federal Govt's Apathy Over Civil Rights Economic Developments Rs. 99.821 Billion Released for Development Projects KPK, GB Chambers Join United Business Group International Developments U.S. Extends Financial Adviser Call for Pakistan's 4,500-MW Diamer Bhasha Hydro Project UNESCO has Called for Entries for its Asia-Pacific Awards for Cultural Heritage Conservation Other Developments Trophying Hunt of Markhor to Cost $60,000 Road to Chitral Village Restored After Four Years Clearing Away: Anti-Encroachment Drive in Mirpur No. 1, Development Enclave, Rao Tula Ram Marg New Delhi-110 010 Jammu & Kashmir (Source: Based on the Survey of India Map, Govt of India 2000 ) In this Edition Under the Gilgit Baltistan Empowerment and Self Rule order, the first ever elections were held in the region in 2009. The PPP (Pakistan's Peoples Party) led government in Gilgit Baltistan completed its term in December 2014. However, fresh elections could not be held and there was a debate whether a care taker set could be installed in Gilgit Baltistan. Notably, under the self-rule order, there is no provision for a care taker set up. -
October 2020 News Digest a MONTHLY NEWS DIGEST on PAKISTAN OCCUPIED KASHMIR
POK Volume 13 | Number 10 | October 2020 News Digest A MONTHLY NEWS DIGEST ON PAKISTAN OCCUPIED KASHMIR Political Developments Debate on Gilgit-Baltistan: Implications for the Kashmir issue-I Giving Gilgit-Baltistan provincial status could be a political masterstroke Sedition case controversy takes new turn Sit-in for Baba Jan's release continues on second day in Hunza Rally demands provincial status for Gilgit-Baltistan Urdu Media Work continues on development projects The “fall of Kashmir” and Gilgit-Baltistan Politics on Gilgit-Baltistan No. 1, Development Enclave, Rao Tula Ram Marg New Delhi-110 010 Jammu & Kashmir (Source: GIS Section MP-IDSA) In this Edition As the date of election in GB (on 15 November 2020) came closer, the debate on future status of GB heated up in the Pakistani and local media. There were contradictory views on this. One section of the people argued that granting provincial status to GB was a ‘dangerous’ idea because it was part of the disputed territory of Jammu and Kashmir state and any unilateral move by Pakistan would only strengthen Indian case. Moreover, the leaderships in AJK and Kashmir were opposed to this. The other section argued that while such concerns could be genuine, a via media could be worked in the shape of granting provision provincial status to GB, which would be a ‘political master-stroke. There was a common refrain that Pakistan did not have anything to fear granting the people of the region more local autonomy given the fact that the region had cent percent Muslim population who would decide in favour of joining Pakistan, anytime the plebiscite were to be held. -
The Permanent Liminality of Pakistan's Northern Areas- the Case of Gilgit-Baltistan
Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2020 The Permanent Liminality of Pakistan's Northern Areas- The Case of Gilgit-Baltistan Hamna Tariq [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Asian American Studies Commons, Asian History Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Defense and Security Studies Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Education Policy Commons, Ethnic Studies Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, Islamic World and Near East History Commons, Legal Studies Commons, Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Political History Commons, Public Administration Commons, Public Affairs Commons, Public History Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Public Policy Commons, Social History Commons, Social Policy Commons, South and Southeast Asian Languages and Societies Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Tariq, Hamna, "The Permanent Liminality of Pakistan's Northern Areas- The Case of Gilgit-Baltistan". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2020. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/821 The Permanent Liminality of Pakistan’s Northern Areas: The Case of Gilgit Baltistan Hamna Tariq International Studies and Urban Studies Senior Thesis Supervised by Dr. Garth Myers and Dr. Shafqat Hussain -
Country Information and Guidance Pakistan: Background Information, Including Actors of Protection, and Internal Relocation
Country Information and Guidance Pakistan: Background information, including actors of protection, and internal relocation Preface This document provides supporting guidance to Home Office decision makers on handling claims made by nationals/residents of – but is predominantly country of origin information (COI) about – Pakistan. It must be read in conjunction with the subject-specific country information and guidance reports. Public versions of these documents are available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/pakistan-country-information-and-guidance. Decision makers must consider claims on an individual basis, taking into account the case specific facts and all relevant evidence, including: the guidance contained with this document; the available COI; any applicable caselaw; and the Home Office casework guidance in relation to relevant policies. Within this instruction, links to specific guidance are those on the Home Office’s internal system. Public versions of these documents are available at https://www.gov.uk/immigration- operational-guidance/asylum-policy. Country Information The COI within this document has been compiled from a wide range of external information sources (usually) published in English. Consideration has been given to the relevance, reliability, accuracy, objectivity, currency, transparency and traceability of the information and wherever possible attempts have been made to corroborate the information used across independent sources, to ensure accuracy. All sources cited have been referenced in footnotes. It has been researched and presented with reference to the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI), dated April 2008, and the European Asylum Support Office’s research guidelines, Country of Origin Information report methodology, dated July 2012. -
Pakistan: Country Report the Situa�On in Pakistan
Asylum Research Centre Pakistan: Country Report /shutterstock.com The situa�on in Pakistan Lukasz Stefanski June 2015 (COI up to 20 February 2015) Cover photo © 20 February 2015 (published June 2015) Pakistan Country Report Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms CONTENTS 1. Background Information 1.1. Status of tribal areas 1.1.1. Map of Pakistan 1.1.2. Status in law of the FATA and governance arrangements under the Pakistani Constitution 1.1.3. Status in law of the PATA and governance arrangements under the Pakistani Constitution 1.2. General overview of ethnic and linguistic groups 1.3. Overview of the present government structures 1.3.1. Government structures and political system 1.3.2. Overview of main political parties 1.3.3. The judicial system, including the use of tribal justice mechanisms and the application of Islamic law 1.3.4. Characteristics of the government and state institutions 1.3.4.1. Corruption 1.3.4.2. Professionalism of civil service 1.3.5. Role of the military in governance 1.4. Overview of current socio-economic issues 1.4.1. Rising food prices and food security 1.4.2. Petrol crisis and electricity shortages 1.4.3. Unemployment 2. Main Political Developments (since June 2013) 2.1. Current political landscape 2.2. Overview of major political developments since June 2013, including: 2.2.1. May 2013: General elections 2.2.2. August-December 2014: Opposition protests organised by Pakistan Tekreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) 2.2.3. Former Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf 2.3. -
Class "Justice": Baba Jan and His Comrades Sentenced to 40 Years in Prison!
Class "justice": Baba Jan and his comrades sentenced to 40 years in prison! https://internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article4632 Pakistan Class "justice": Baba Jan and his comrades sentenced to 40 years in prison! - IV Online magazine - 2016 - IV498 - July 2016 - Publication date: Sunday 31 July 2016 Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine - All rights reserved Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine Page 1/5 Class "justice": Baba Jan and his comrades sentenced to 40 years in prison! Accused without evidence of acts that he could not have committed, since he was at the time about sixty kilometres away, Baba Jan was tortured, convicted and then acquitted on appeal. He came second in the elections in 2015 while imprisoned and was tipped to win a by-election. Now our comrade, who is vice-president of the Awami Workers Party (AWP) of Pakistan and leader of the party in the Gilgit-Baltistan region, was sentenced by the Supreme Court of Appeal in this region occupied and administered by Pakistan, on June 8, 2016, to 40 years in prison and a fine of 500,000 rupees, under a special law, called "anti-terrorist." Eight other activists - Iftikhar Hussain, Aleem, Irfan Ali, Shukurullah Baig, Sarfraz, Rasheed, Musa and Sher Khan - received the same sentence. [1] Despite what the severity of the sentence seems to imply, Baba Jan and his comrades are not activists who took up arms against the state. They simply raised their voices for the fate of thousands of people of the Hunza Valley who were displaced as a result of a climate disaster in January 2010 and protested against corruption and against the violent repression that had been unleashed against the victims demonstrating in August 2011. -
The Attabad Landslide and the Politics of Disaster in Gojal, Gilgit-Baltistan
The Attabad landslide and the politics of disaster in Gojal, Gilgit-Baltistan Martin Sökefeld 1. Introduction On 4th of January, 2010, a gigantic mass of rocks came down the slope above Attabad, a village in the high mountain area of Gilgit-Baltistan, northern Pakistan. The large-scale landslide filled the narrow valley of the Hunza-River, burying part of the village and the neighbouring hamlet of Sarat. It did not come unanticipated. Already years before widening cracks had appeared on the slope. Attabad had been evacuated but a number of families returned. The landslide claimed nineteen lives. While this was disastrous enough, a second disaster de- veloped in consequence of the first. The debris created a huge barrier of more than hundred metres height and one kilometre width which completely blocked the flow of the Hunza-River and also buried the Karakorum Highway (KKH), the only road link to the area. Consequentially, the whole area upstream, the tahsil (subdistrict) of Gojal, was cut off from access to Pakistan. In the subse- quent weeks a lake developed behind the barrier which continued to grow till August 2010. Until then it had reached a length of almost thirty kilometres. The lake inundated one village completely and four others partly. Large sections of the KKH came under water so that also communication between the villages was severely disrupted. A growing body of literature of the anthropology of disasters has pointed out that “natural disasters” are in fact not simply “natural”. Taking mostly a political ecology perspective which emphasises the close connection, interdependency and, practically, mutual constitution of “nature” and “society”, it has been ar- gued that disasters occur when events that are characterised as being “natural” (i.e. -
Pok Mar 2012
POK Volume 5 | Number 3 | March 2012 News Digest A MONTHLY NEWS DIGEST ON PAKISTAN OCCUPIED KASHMIR Compiled & Edited by Dr Priyanka Singh Political Developments Passengers Hauled off Buses and Gunned Down: 16 Killed In Kohistan Sectarian Attack Corruption in Compensation Being Probed Gilgit-Baltistan Divided into Three Divisions G-B Seeks Representation in Senate Judicial Controversy: Protests Against Appointment of G-B Chief Judge Economic Developments Over Rs14mn Goods Traded Across LoC in a Day Erra Body Approves Development Projects for Muzaffarabad City Joint Kashmir Chamber Calls for Free Movement for Traders International Developments Kuwait Extends $40m For Neelum-Jehlum Power Project AJK, Korea Sign Hydro Power Project Accord Other Developments Removing Blockade: Attabad Lake's Spillway Dynamited Pakistan Dam Develops Cracks No. 1, Development Enclave, Rao Tula Ram Marg New Delhi-110 010 Jammu & Kashmir (Source: Based on the Survey of India Map, Govt of India 2000 ) In this Edition Two significant developments took place in PoK in the month of February 2012, which have challenged existing systems and practices there. A grisly attack on Shia pilgrims took place in in Kohistan on the Karakoram Highway on February 28, 2012. At least 18 pilgrims who were on their way back to Gilgit Baltistan were forced to disembark from a bus, identified as Shias and shot to death. The incident led to considerable unrest in the region amidst demands that perpetrators of the killings be brought to justice. Jandullah, a terrorist group with linkages to the Taliban claimed responsibility of the attack, stating clearly that these people were targeted as they were Shias. -
Basic IT Result of Batch-14 Exam Held on 05-06 December 2020 Note: Failled Or Absentees Need Not Apply Again
Basic IT Result of Batch-14 Exam held on 05-06 December 2020 Note: Failled or absentees need not apply again. They will automatically be called for next retake exam. Result Status "RL" means Result Late that will be declared within 15 days. Dated: 01-01-2021 S.No Name Department NIC Studentid Module Status Batch Ord 9075 Udc Muhammad 1 Rasheed Ordinance army corps 37405-6628888-9 VU201400798 3 RL 14 2 Majid Hanif Federal Investigation Agency 61101-3123264-9 VU201401425 3 RL 14 3 Majid Aziz Qureshi Main Ministry 61101-4472647-7 VU170403860 3 Pass 14 4 Waseer Khan National Highways Motorway Police 11201-4478604-3 VU201400019 3 Pass 14 5 Nayyar Abbas RV&FC 12101-3656262-5 VU201400025 3 Pass 14 6 Muhammad Waqas President Secretariat (Personal) 12103-9359140-5 VU201400031 3 Pass 14 Directorate General Pakistan Post 7 Muhammad Zahid Islamabad 13101-4737242-3 VU201400038 3 Pass 14 8 Sakina Ashraf National Highways & Motorway Police 13101-5008611-6 VU201400039 3 Pass 14 9 Sarfraz Baloch Records Wing Abbottabad 13101-5162514-5 VU201400040 3 Pass 14 Pakistan military academy kakul Officers 10 Bakhtawar Khan Mess 13101-5309498-7 VU201400041 3 Pass 14 11 Muhammad Zeeshan GM (SS) / YSD 13101-8805361-1 VU201400043 3 Pass 14 12 Muhammad Qasir Estate Office 13101-9589501-1 VU201400044 3 Pass 14 13 Ishfaq Hussain RV&FC 13302-0355267-5 VU201400050 3 Pass 14 14 Ishfaq Ahmed Ministry of Maritime Affairs 13302-8186390-7 VU201400052 3 Pass 14 15 Murad Ali PNS BAHADUR/ Majeed SRE 13302-9420734-9 VU201400055 3 Pass 14 16 Ghulam Hussain Federal Board of Revenue -
Gilgit-Baltistan Assembly Elections, 2020
GILGIT-BALTISTAN ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS, 2020 Global Election Observers Network’s Preliminary Observation Report GEON OBSERVERD ORDERLY AND PEACEFUL POLLING ON 15 NOV 2020. COMPLAINTS ON RESULTS WERE ADRESSED BY ECGB. 300 NOTICES SERVED ON VIOLATION BY ECGB. ECGB HELD PRESS CONFERENCES AND RE- POLLING IN DIFFERENT CONSTITUENCIES ON CONCERNS OF POLITICAL CANDIDATES. WEATHER FACTOR AFFECTED THE POLL AT FEW POLLING STATIONS. RE ELECTION WILL BE HELD IN CONSTITUENCIES WITH COMPLAINTS ALONG WITH GBLA 3 ON 22 NOV 2020. GILGIT-BALTISTAN ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS, 2020 Global Election Observers Network’s Preliminary Observation Report Gilgit Baltistan Election, 15 Nov 2020 Observed by Global Election Observers Network (GEON) The third consecutive elections for the legislative assembly of Gilgit Baltistan ,after the status of province, were held on 15 Nov 2020 under the Presidential order to form a caretaker government and for extension of the Elections Act 2017 to Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) promulgated on 17 May 2020.The assembly is unicameral that consists of 33 members who are representatives of the people of GB. 24 members come through general elections while 6 seats are reserved for women and 3 seats for technocrats. The elections initially were held on 23 seats because one candidate, Syed Jaffar Shah of PTI went to his eternal abode. Election on this seat took place on held on 22 Nov where 23 candidates were in the run. Number of total votes registered is 745,361 out of which, 339,998 are women, which constitutes 46% of the total electors. Total population of GB is 1.4 Million (14 hundred thousand) in 2017 census. -
Pakistani Kashmir *
Published on Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org) Home > Pakistani Kashmir * Pakistani Kashmir * Country: Pakistani Kashmir * Year: 2018 Freedom Status: Not Free Political Rights: 6 Civil Liberties: 5 Aggregate Score: 28 Freedom Rating: 5.5 Overview: Pakistani Kashmir is administered as two territories: Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and Gilgit-Baltistan (GB). Each has an elected assembly and government with limited autonomy, but they lack the parliamentary representation and other rights of Pakistani provinces, and Pakistani federal institutions have predominant influence over security, the courts, and most important policy matters. Politics within the two territories are carefully managed to promote the idea of Kashmir’s eventual accession to Pakistan. Freedoms of expression and association, and any political activity deemed contrary to Pakistan’s policy on Kashmir, are restricted. Political Rights and Civil Liberties: POLITICAL RIGHTS: 9 / 40 A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 4 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 1 / 4 Both AJK and GB have locally elected executive leaders. However, the Pakistani government also controls—directly and indirectly—key executive functions, and it is not accountable to voters in the two territories. Under AJK’s 1974 interim constitution, a president elected by the Legislative Assembly serves as head of state, while the elected prime minister is the chief executive. After the 2016 elections, the new assembly elected the local leader of Pakistan’s ruling Pakistan Muslim League–Nawaz (PML-N), Raja Farooq Haider, as prime minister, and Masood Khan, formerly a senior Pakistani diplomat, as president. An AJK Council is based in Pakistan’s capital, Islamabad, consisting of both Kashmiri and Pakistani officials and chaired by the Pakistani prime minister.