DOCSLIB.ORG

162 Subpart 66.10—Uniform State Waterway Marking System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
162 Subpart 66.10—Uniform State Waterway Marking System § 66.10–1 33 CFR Ch. I (7–1–16 Edition) portion within Havasu Lake National ters of the U.S. that have been des- Wildlife Refuge. ignated as state waters for private aids (b) Louisiana. The portion of Toledo to navigation and in those internal wa- Bend Reservoir within the State. ters that are non-navigable waters of (c) Missouri. Teach water within the the U.S. All other provisions for the State except the: use of regulatory markers and other (1) Mississippi River; and aids to navigation must be in accord- (2) Missouri River. ance with United States Aid to Naviga- (d) Montana. The portion of Missouri tion System, described in part 62 of River between the U.S. Highway 287 this subchapter. bridge near Townsend and Great Falls (b) Until December 31, 2003, the Uni- including the following impoundments: form State Waterway Marking Sys- (1) Black Eagle Dam Reservoir. tem’s (USWMS) aids to navigation pro- (2) Canyon Ferry Reservoir. visions for marking channels and ob- (3) Hauser Lake. structions may be used in those navi- (4) Holter Lake. gable waters of the U.S. that have been (5) Rainbow Dam Reservoir. designated as state waters for private (e) North Carolina. Navigable waters aids to navigation and in those inter- within the State not marked with nal waters that are non-navigable wa- Coast Guard aids to navigation on June ters of the U.S. All other provisions for 1, 1973. the use of regulatory markers and (f) Pennsylvania. The portion of other aids to navigation shall be in ac- Youghiogheny River Reservoir within cordance with United States Aid to the State. Navigation System, described in part (f–1) South Carolina. (1) The portion of 62 of this subchapter. Lake Wylie within the State; (2) Lake (c) The USATONS may be used in all Marion; (3) Lake Moultrie; and (4) Lake U.S. waters under state jurisdiction, Murray. including non-navigable state waters. (g) Texas. The portion of Toledo Bend Reservoir within the State. [CGD 97–018, 63 FR 33574, June 19, 1998, as (h) Virginia. (1) Claytor Lake, on the amended by USCG–2012–0306, 77 FR 37312, June 21, 2012] New River in Pulaski County. (2) Leesville Lake, on the Roanoke §§ 66.10–5—66.10–10 [Reserved] River below Smith Mountain Dam. (3) The portions of the following res- § 66.10–15 Aids to navigation. ervoirs within the State: (a) USWMS aids to navigation may (i) Gaston. have lateral or cardinal meaning. (ii) Holston. (b) On a well defined channel includ- (iii) John H. Kerr. ing a river or other relatively narrow (iv) Philpott. natural or improved waterway, an aid (i) Wisconsin. Navigable waters with- to navigation shall normally be a solid in the State not marked with Coast colored buoy. A buoy which marks the Guard aids to navigation as of May 1, left side of the channel viewed looking 1996. upstream or toward the head of naviga- [CGD 72–154R, 38 FR 33473, Dec. 5, 1973, as tion shall be colored all black. A buoy amended by CGD 76–015, 41 FR 12879, Mar. 29, which marks the right side of the chan- 1976; CGD 80–132, 46 FR 27643, May 21, 1981; nel viewed looking upstream or toward CGD 98–3604, 63 FR 55947, Oct. 20, 1998; USCG– the head of navigation shall be colored 2001–10714, 69 FR 24982, May 5, 2004] all red. On a well defined channel, solid colored buoys shall be established in Subpart 66.10—Uniform State pairs, one on each side of the navigable Waterway Marking System channel which they mark, and opposite each other to inform the user that the § 66.10–1 General. channel lies between the buoys and (a) The Uniform State Waterway that the user should pass between the Marking System’s (USWMS) aids to buoys. navigation provisions for marking (c) On an irregularly defined channel, channels and obstructions (see § 66.10– solid colored buoys may be used singly 15) may be used in those navigable wa- in staggered fashion on alternate sides 162 VerDate Sep<11>2014 12:01 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 238137 PO 00000 Frm 00172 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\33\33V1.TXT 31 lpowell on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Missouri-Madison Project
    Hydropower Project Summary MISSOURI AND MADISON RIVERS, MONTANA MISSOURI-MADISON HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2188) Hauser Dam Morony Dam Photos: PPL Montana This summary was produced by the Hydropower Reform Coalition and River Management Society Missouri and Madison Rivers, Montana MISSOURI AND MADISON RIVERS, MONTANA MISSOURI-MADISON HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2188) DESCRIPTION: This hydropower license includes nine developments, of which eight were constructed between 1906 and 1930, and the ninth- the Cochrane dam- began operation in 1958. The projects are spread over 324 river-miles on the Missouri and Madison rivers. The Hebgen and Madison developments are located on the Madison River whereas the other seven- Hauser, Holter, Black Eagle, Rainbow, Cochrane, Ryan, and Morony- are located on the Missouri River. The Madison River flows into the Missouri River near the city of Three Forks, approximately 33 miles northwest of Bozeman. While this summary was being prepared, Northwestern Energy, a company based in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and serving the Upper Midwest and Northwest, is in the process of acquiring this project. Read more at http://www.northwesternenergy.com/hydroelectric-facilities. A. SUMMARY 1. License application filed: November 25, 1992 2. License issued: September 27, 2000 3. License expiration: August 31, 2040 4. Waterway: Missouri and Madison Rivers 5. Capacity: 326.9 MW 6. Licensee: PPL Montana 7. Counties: Gallatin, Madison, Lewis and Clark, and Cascade Counties 8. Project area: Portions of the project are located on federal lands, including lands within the Gallatin and Helena National Forests 9. Project Website: http://www.pplmontana.com/producing+power/power+plants/PPL+Montana+Hyd ro.htm 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel T. Hauser and Hydroelectric Development on the Missouri River, 1898--1912
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1979 Victim of monopoly| Samuel T. Hauser and hydroelectric development on the Missouri River, 1898--1912 Alan S. Newell The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Newell, Alan S., "Victim of monopoly| Samuel T. Hauser and hydroelectric development on the Missouri River, 1898--1912" (1979). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4013. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4013 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPT IN WHICH COPYRIGHT SUB­ SISTS. ANY FURTHER REPRINTING OF ITS CONTENTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE AUTHOR. MANSFIELD LIBRARY 7' UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA DATE: 1979 A VICTIM OF MONOPOLY: SAMUEL T. HAUSER AND HYDROELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT ON THE MISSOURI RIVER, 1898-1912 By Alan S. Newell B.A., University of Montana, 1970 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1979 Approved by: VuOiAxi Chairman,lairman, Board of Examiners De^n, Graduate SctooI /A- 7*? Date UMI Number: EP36398 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fishing Regulations
    MONTANA FISHING REGULATIONS 20March 1, 2018 — F1ebruary 828, 2019 Fly fishing the Missouri River. Photo by Jason Savage For details on how to use these regulations, see page 2 fwp.mt.gov/fishing With your help, we can reduce poaching. MAKE THE CALL: 1-800-TIP-MONT FISH IDENTIFICATION KEY If you don’t know, let it go! CUTTHROAT TROUT are frequently mistaken for Rainbow Trout (see pictures below): 1. Turn the fish over and look under the jaw. Does it have a red or orange stripe? If yes—the fish is a Cutthroat Trout. Carefully release all Cutthroat Trout that cannot be legally harvested (see page 10, releasing fish). BULL TROUT are frequently mistaken for Brook Trout, Lake Trout or Brown Trout (see below): 1. Look for white edges on the front of the lower fins. If yes—it may be a Bull Trout. 2. Check the shape of the tail. Bull Trout have only a slightly forked tail compared to the lake trout’s deeply forked tail. 3. Is the dorsal (top) fin a clear olive color with no black spots or dark wavy lines? If yes—the fish is a Bull Trout. Carefully release Bull Trout (see page 10, releasing fish). MONTANA LAW REQUIRES: n All Bull Trout must be released immediately in Montana unless authorized. See Western District regulations. n Cutthroat Trout must be released immediately in many Montana waters. Check the district standard regulations and exceptions to know where you can harvest Cutthroat Trout. NATIVE FISH Westslope Cutthroat Trout Species of Concern small irregularly shaped black spots, sparse on belly Average Size: 6”–12” cutthroat slash— spots
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Walleye in the Missouri River Between Holter Dam and Great Falls, Montana
    An Evaluation of Walleye in the Missouri River between Holter Dam and Great Falls, Montana PPL-Montana MOTAC projects 771-09, 771-10, 759-11, 771-11 and Fisheries Bureau Federal Aid Job Progress Report Federal Aid Project Number F-113-R9, R10, R11, R12 Montana Statewide Fisheries Management Submitted to PPL-Montana 336 Rainbow Dam Great Falls, Mt. 59404 Prepared by Grant Grisak, Brad Tribby and Adam Strainer Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks 4600 Giant Springs Road Great Falls, Mt. 49505 January 2012 1 Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 5 Study Area……………………………………………………………………………. 5 Creel survey………………………………………………………………… 10 Angling……………………………………………………………………... 10 Fish Abundance………………………………………………………………………. 11 Tagging……………………………………………………………………………….. 15 Radio Telemetry……………………………………………………………………… 17 Early Life History…………………………………………………………………….. 28 Diet…………………………………………………………………………………… 32 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………….. 34 References……………………………………………………………………………. 37 2 List of Tables No. Page 1. Angler use statistics for Missouri River section 9, 1991-2009………………... 8 2. Economic statistics for the Missouri River section 9, 1995-2009……………... 9 3. Angler use statistics for Missouri River section 8, combined angler days with 9 section 9, and economic statistics for section 8 and section 9, 1991- 2009……………………………………………………………………………. 4. Landmarks and associated river miles in the Missouri River between Holter 18 Dam and Black Eagle Dam……………………………………………………. 5. Meristics of radio tagged walleye in Missouri River, total miles traveled and 26 total days radio transmitter was active, 2008-2011……………………………. 6. Locations in the Missouri River and proportional use by radio tagged walleye 27 2008-10. Missouri River, Montana……………………………………………. 7. Young of the year walleye seined at sites in the Missouri River between 30 Cascade and Great Falls……………………………………………………….. 8. Number of fish species sampled by year and total number of sites where 31 found.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainbow Trout and Brown Trout Movements Between the Missouri River, Sun River and Smith River, Montana
    Rainbow Trout and Brown Trout Movements Between the Missouri River, Sun River and Smith River, Montana PPL-Montana MOTAC projects 021-08, 771-09, 771-10, 771-11 Submitted to PPL-Montana 336 Rainbow Dam Great Falls, Mt. 59404 Prepared by Grant Grisak, Adam Strainer and Brad Tribby Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks 4600 Giant Springs Road Great Falls, Mt. 49505 January 2012 Introduction From 2008-2011 Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (MFWP) conducted studies to evaluate rainbow trout and brown trout behavior in the Missouri River near Great Falls and the level of interaction these fish have between the Missouri, Sun and Smith rivers. These studies were funded by PPL-Montana MOTAC projects 021-08, 771-09, 771-10, 771-11 as part of FERC license 2188. Segments of all three rivers are considered good habitat for trout. The Missouri River segment includes the upper 30 miles of river from Holter Dam to Cascade. In the Sun River, the upper 39.2 miles from Diversion Dam downstream to the Crown Butte Canal headgate is considered good trout habitat. In the Smith River, the upper 98.9 miles from the North and South forks confluence downstream to Eden Bridge is considered good trout habitat. Although trout are present in the lower reaches of these rivers, those areas would not be considered good trout habitat due to low gradient channel, high turbidity, high water temperatures and predominantly sand and silt substrate. The purpose of this study was to 1) determine the importance of these segments of rivers to the overall trout populations, 2) determine the interconnectivity of these three rivers, and 3) generalize the behavior of trout found in these sections of river.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Look at Hydropower
    fedgazette Page 13 NINTH DISTRICT FEATURE OCTOBER 2 01 1 Brookfield Renewable Power’s $35 million project on Lower St. Anthony Lock and Dam near down - town Minneapolis involved installing 16 turbines in an auxiliary lock next to the shipping channel. Power from the project can provide electricity for as many as 7,500 homes. A new look at hydropower Thanks to new technology and recent tax incentives, new energy proposals are coming to district rivers By FRANK JOSSI has never been much of a hydropower renewable energy—is also creating ing dam infrastructure to capture water Contributing Writer producer, especially compared with the renewed interest in this old-form power energy at five locks and dams (numbers Colorado, Missouri and Columbia rivers. source. Montana, for example, has 12 3, 4, 6, 7 and 9) between Red Wing, Call it a return to renewable roots. But spurred by aggressive renewable proposed and active projects involving Minn., and Lynxville, Wis., that will gen - Hydropower has been around long energy tax credits and new hydropower dam-and-turbine hydropower on rivers. erate more than 51 megawatts (MW). before the words “renewable energy” technology, a handful of companies have And that’s not all that’s happening became a political lightning rod in the filed plans to transform the lock-and- The Ol’ Miss on the river. Free Flow has proposed energy industry. But over the years, pro - dam system on the Upper Mississippi projects using the same technology for ponents of hydropower have watched it from Minneapolis to Rock Island, Ill., The main player on the Upper dams at Coon Rapids, Minn.
    [Show full text]
  • Canyon Ferry Unit History
    Canyon Ferry Project Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program Eric A. Stene Bureau of Reclamation 1994 Table of Contents Canyon Ferry Unit .............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................2 Project Authorization.....................................................4 Construction History .....................................................5 Post Construction History ................................................18 Settlement of Project ....................................................18 Uses of Project Water ...................................................19 Conclusion............................................................20 About the Author .............................................................20 Bibliography ................................................................21 Manuscripts and Archival Collections.......................................21 Government Documents .................................................21 Books ................................................................21 Articles...............................................................21 Index ......................................................................22 1 Canyon Ferry Unit Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program As the Bureau of Reclamation approached its fiftieth birthday, its leaders envisioned projects on an increasingly grand scale. Reclamation's counterpart from the War Department,
    [Show full text]
  • A PDF Version
    I Great Falls, Montana has the lowest average airfares in Montana, and is Great Falls, Montana is in the Northern and Western hemispheres, located at the Intersection of Interstate HWY 15 and State HWY 200. receiving all four seasons of Spring, Summer, Fall and Winter! Temperatures vary by season as well, with average highs and lows CALGARY ranging. 319 miles \ ~ --~ FAHRENHEIT ~ HIGH IJ~: IF:: IM4:R I~RIM~ v I J~t IJ: 3L IA~; Is7E: Ios:T IN:3v ID 3Et SEATTLE MINNEAPOUS 670miles 967 miles LOW 15 16 23 31 39 46 51 SO 42 33 23 15 SPOKANE 364 miles CELSIUS JAN IFEB IMARI APRI MAY IJUN 'I JULIAUG ISEP IOCTi NOV IDEC HIGH 1.9 3.5 7.7 13.1 18.2 22.9 28.6 27.9 21 .31°14.3 6.3 1.4 LOW I-9.5 -8.7 -5.2 -.8 3.7 7 .8 10.8 10.2 5.6 4 -4.8 -9.5 'Data from US Climate » MONTANA'S Museum Capital SALT LAKE CITY » MONTANA'S Only City on the Missouri River 571 miles DENVER 770mlles » MONTANA'S Lowest Average Airfares » MONTANA'S Best Irish Pub » MONTANA'S Only live Mermaids » MONTANA'S Only City with 5 Falls ~ DELTA UNITED~ ~.,fg allegiant » MONTANA'S Most Visited State Park » MONTANA'S Best Coffee Shop Great Falls is serviced by Alaska Airlines, Delta, United and » NORTH AMERICA'S Largest Buffalo Jump Allegiant Air with direct flights from Salt Lake City, Denver, » NORTH AMERICA'S Largest Lewis & Cl ark Corps of Discovery Exhibit Minneapolis, Chicago (seasonally), Seattle, Phoenix & Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • Distance in Miles from Lewis and Clark Interpretive Center
    Havre Morony Dam Road M orony D am R oa VisitGreatFallsMontana.org d R y a n Morony D a Dam m 6 R d Morony Dam Road Ryan Dam 5 Ryan Island Cochrane oad ls R Dam ffe e h S s ll Fa t d ea a Gr o e R h t Lewis and Clark f 87 e l o g Interpretive e Bootlegger Trail Bootlegger g a ta E Center Giant Springs r o p k State Park ’s c rk a la l d C B an ewis inbow Dam Ro of L Ra ad ute ro Rainbow Dam ric to is H DISTANCE IN MILES FROM LEWIS e v AND CLARK INTERPRETIVE CENTER ri Rainbow Dam D Smelter Ave. r Overlook Black ive Eagle R Giant Springs (via trail) 0.5 Dam Rainbow Overlook (via trail) 1.8 L&C Overlook (via trail) 2.1 Black r Crooked Falls Overlook (via trail) 3.1 NW Bypass 3rd St NW ive Eagle i R Malmstrom ur Memorial Air Force Base NORTH Cochrane Dam (via trail) 6.6 Montana so ExpoPark is Island Ryan Dam (via trail) 8.6 M CM Russell L&C Interpretive Center (via trail) 0.0 Museum Caboose Black Eagle Dam Overlook Caboose (via trail) 2.1 38th Street 38th Central Ave. West Roads 15th Street 15th 2nd Avenue North 15th St. Bridge (via highway) 2.6 EXIT 280 Central Ave. West RIVER’S EDGE TRAIL Black Eagle Dam (via highway) 1.5 Black Eagle Island (via highway) 4.0 Great Falls Paris Malmstrom Paved Trails Montana Gibson Central Avenue Air Force Base US 87 turnoff to Ryan Dam (via highway) 6.3 Tourism Square Museum Dirt Trails Children’s 1 mile Ryan Dam (via highway) 15.0 Museum of Montana Gravel Trails Morony Dam (via highway) 21.0 The 57th Street History 1 km First Peoples Buffalo Jump (via highway) 20.3 Museum 25th Street er 9th Street Trail Parking Riv 10th Avenue South Great Falls Montana Tourism 4.5 Sun 6th St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Missouri River – Holter Dam Tailwater Monitoring
    2018 Missouri River – Holter Dam Tailwater Monitoring Status Report for Northwestern Energy FERC Project 2188 Prepared by Jason Mullen, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Katie Vivian, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks January 2019 At the November 2017 Missouri River Technical Advisory Committee (MOTAC) meeting, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks was awarded $32,153 from Northwestern Energy for monitoring of the Missouri River and the fishery below Holter Dam as part of FERC license 2188. This report summarizes the results of the 2018 monitoring. Missouri River trout populations Two sections of the Missouri River downstream from Holter Dam were electrofished at night using aluminum jet boats. The Craig section is 5.6 miles long and located from river mile (RM) 2.5 to 8.1 (Figure 1). The Cascade section is 4.1 miles long and is located from RM 24.2 to 28.3 (Figure 2). Jet propelled boats were equipped with headlights and fixed boom-type electrofishing systems using stainless steel cable droppers suspended from each boom. Electricity from 240-VAC generators was converted to smooth DC using Coffelt or Smith-Root rectifying units. Brown trout (Salmo trutta) estimates were conducted in each section in spring from the 24th of April to the 10th of May. Two jet boats were used in the Craig section, and one boat was used in the Cascade section with two nights of marking runs and two nights of recapture runs in each section. Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) estimates were conducted in fall from the 1st of October to the 16th of October and two boats were used in each section.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the River's Edge Rural Trail
    16. Paper Recycled on Printed THE LEWIS & CLARK 17. thetrail.org HERITAGE GREENWAY SULPHUR SPRING TRAIL PPL Montana owns and operates the five Walk this 1.8 mile pedestrian-only R MONTANA PPL hydroelectric developments on the Missouri Riverr in E trail downstream to the spring and V the Great Falls area – Black Eagle, Rainbow, I learn the story of these mineral Cochrane, Ryan and Morony. In 1999 the Montanaa R waters that provided a cure for Power Company, former owner of the I MoronyMorony DamDam RoadRoad website trail To developments, donated a 2,415 acre conservationn Sacagawea, the Indian woman on R easement along Rainbow, Cochrane, Ryan and the Lewis and Clark Expedition of U Morony reservoirs to Montana Fish, Wildlife & 1805. O S Parks. A second donation to MFWP was a public S Free Montana PPL I GREAT FALLS trail easement through these lands to provide flowing by provided map Trail Edge River’s M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M river the recreational opportunities. The Montana Power this of printing and design the for Funding next Company also partnered with the R.K. Mellon 5. 200 Foundation to convey about 435 acres of lands at RYAN IISLANDSLAND DAY USUSEE AREA miles you. Thank 59403-0553. MT, Falls, Great 553, Box TRAILS ALONG Sulphur Spring to MFWP. 14. P.O. Trail, Edge River’s to: donation tax-deductible THE RESERVOIRS The Ryan Island Day Use Area, managed by PPL your send trail the extend and improve help To The Lewis & Clark Heritage Greenway, located on Montana, includes paved accessible paths, rest I corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 303(D) List
    2010 303(d) List TMDL_PLANNING_AREA WATERSHED HUC_NO ID305B LOCATION CAUSE_NAME CYCLE_FIRST_LISTED TMDL_PROJECT_STATUS Beaver Milk 10050014 MT40M001_013 BEAVER CREEK, Fort Belknap Reservation boundary to Big Warm Creek Mercury 2006 Unassigned Beaver Milk 10050014 MT40M001_013 BEAVER CREEK, Fort Belknap Reservation boundary to Big Warm Creek Phosphorus (Total) 2006 Unassigned Beaver Milk 10050014 MT40M001_014 BEAVER CREEK, Big Warm Creek to Un-Named tributary, T30N R32E S32 Mercury 2006 Unassigned Beaver Milk 10050014 MT40M001_014 BEAVER CREEK, Big Warm Creek to Un-Named tributary, T30N R32E S32 Phosphorus (Total) 2006 Unassigned Beaver Milk 10050014 MT40M001_020 BEAVER CREEK, Bowdoin Canal to mouth (Milk River) Nitrogen (Total) 1990 Scheduled Beaver Milk 10050014 MT40M001_020 BEAVER CREEK, Bowdoin Canal to mouth (Milk River) Phosphorus (Total) 1990 Scheduled Beaver Milk 10050014 MT40M001_020 BEAVER CREEK, Bowdoin Canal to mouth (Milk River) Uranium 2000 Scheduled Beaver Milk 10050014 MT40M002_010 FLAT CREEK, headwaters to mouth (Beaver Creek), T27N R32E S35 Arsenic 2006 Scheduled Beaver Milk 10050014 MT40M002_010 FLAT CREEK, headwaters to mouth (Beaver Creek), T27N R32E S35 Cadmium 2006 Scheduled Beaver Milk 10050014 MT40M002_010 FLAT CREEK, headwaters to mouth (Beaver Creek), T27N R32E S35 Copper 2006 Scheduled Beaver Milk 10050014 MT40M002_010 FLAT CREEK, headwaters to mouth (Beaver Creek), T27N R32E S35 Iron 2006 Scheduled Beaver Milk 10050014 MT40M002_010 FLAT CREEK, headwaters to mouth (Beaver Creek), T27N R32E S35 Lead 2006 Scheduled
    [Show full text]