Program Occasional Paper Series Winter 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Program Occasional Paper Series Winter 2011 MIDDLE EAST PROGRAM OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES WINTER 2011 MIDDLE EAST PROGRAM WINTER OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES 2011 Introduction 1 The Security State and its Fractured Elites 4 The Impacts of Internal and External Tensions on the Iranian Economy 7 Education in Iran: National Pride, Regime Prejudice 19 Iran and the Persian Gulf Iran: Turmoil at Home, States: From Conflict to Détente to Assertiveness Abroad? Conflict Again? 22 Introduction ruling elite has narrowed. The Revolutionary Perspective from the Guards and the security agencies have Haleh Esfandiari, Director, Middle East Arab World 28 emerged as major players in the economic Program, Woodrow Wilson International and political decision-making process. At the Center for Scholars That Other Track, same time, he noted, serious divisions have That Other Partner: The EU In September 2011, the Middle East emerged within this ruling elite: between the and Iran 30 Program of the Woodrow Wilson Center supporters of President Ahmadinejad and the brought together six leading Iran experts to conservative establishment, between the pres- Stubborn Nuclear Program, consider the current state of Iran’s domestic ident and parliament, between Ahmadinejad Stubborn Foreign Policy: politics and the major foreign policy issues and the Supreme Leader, and between com- Iran’s Face-Off with the it is facing. This was the first in a series of peting camps among the conservatives. United States 33 meetings the Middle East Program will host Bijan Khajehpour provided an overview as Iran heads for parliamentary elections in of the economy. He analyzed the impact of March 2012 and presidential elections the international sanctions on the economy, the following year. costs and fallout of the removal of subsidies Shaul Bakhash opened the meeting with on fuel, electricity and other utilities, the an overview of the domestic situation. He significance of the recently uncovered $2.6 argued that since the contested 2009 presi- billion banking scandal, oil revenues, and dential elections and the suppression of the general economic prospects. He predicted Green Movement the regime has grown that inflation will reach 25 percent by the 1 more repressive and the composition of the end of March 2012, lower purchasing power MIDDLE EAST PROGRAM OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES WINTER 2011 Director The Middle East Program was launched in February 1998 in light of Dr. Haleh Esfandiari increased U.S. engagement in the region and the profound changes sweeping across many Middle Eastern states. In addition to spotlighting Assistants day-to-day issues, the Program concentrates on long-term economic, social, Kendra Heideman and political developments, as well as relations with the United States. Mona Youssef The Middle East Program draws on domestic and foreign regional experts for its meetings, conferences, and occasional papers. Conferences and Special thanks meetings assess the policy implications of all aspects of developments Special thanks to within the region and individual states; the Middle East’s role in the interna- Kendra Heideman and tional arena; American interests in the region; the threat of terrorism; arms Mona Youssef for proliferation; and strategic threats to and from the regional states. coordinating and editing this The Program pays special attention to the role of women, youth, civil publication; Mona Moussavi society institutions, Islam, and democratic and autocratic tendencies. In for her transcription assistance; addition, the Middle East Program hosts meetings on cultural issues, includ- Tara Dewan-Czarnecki for ing contemporary art and literature in the region. her editing assistance; the Design staff for designing the • Current Affairs: The Middle East Program emphasizes analysis of cur- Occasional Paper Series; and rent issues and their implications for long-term developments in the region, David Hawxhurst for including: the events surrounding the uprisings of 2011 in the Middle taking the photographs. East and its effect on economic, political and social life in countries in the region, the increased use of social media, the role of youth, Palestinian- Israeli diplomacy, Iran’s political and nuclear ambitions, the drawdown of American troops in Afghanistan and Iraq and their effect on the region, human rights violations, globalization, economic and political partnerships, and U.S. foreign policy in the region. • Gender Issues: The Middle East Program devotes considerable atten- tion to the role of women in advancing civil society and to the attitudes of governments and the clerical community toward women’s rights in the family and society at large. The Program examines employment patterns, education, legal rights, and political participation of women in the region. The Program also has a keen interest in exploring women’s increasing roles in conflict prevention and post-conflict reconstruction activities. • Islam, Democracy and Civil Society: The Middle East Program moni- tors the growing demand of people in the region for the transition to democ- ratization, political participation, accountable government, the rule of law, and adherence by their governments to international conventions, human rights, and women’s rights. It continues to examine the role of Islamic movements and the role of Islamic parties in shaping political and social developments and the variety of factors that favor or obstruct the expansion of civil society. The following papers are based on the authors’ presentations at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars on September 30, 2011. The opinions expressed 2 herein are those of the authors and do not reflect those of the Woodrow Wilson Center. for the people, a slow-down in the housing market, Parsi noted that the EU’s relationship with Iran and continued budget deficits. has always depended on the Iran-U.S. relationship. Iran is currently undergoing a second cultural At the same time, reaching a consensus on foreign revolution, according to Roberto Toscano. He noted that four ideological pillars of the Islamic Republic have greatly shaped education: the insepa- rability of religion and politics, Islamic revival, cul- tural revolution, and the creation of the new Islamic person. The regime never resolved the contradiction between the desire of high-quality technological and scientific education and the individual as pas- sive consumer of official (authoritarian or totali- tarian) culture. The reformists under President Khatami attempted to close the gap between these two approaches to education but had only limited success. Under President Ahmadinejad, education policy is attempting a return to the original project of “advanced science and medieval religion,” but this is an educational counter-reformation destined to fail, according to Toscano. policy between 27 members of the union, whether Afshin Molavi discussed Iran’s relations with the on Iran or other issues, is not an easy task. While countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council and par- there is a history of engagement by the EU countries ticularly with Saudi Arabia. Reviewing the ebb and with Iran, according to Parsi, in the current politi- flow of Iran-Saudi relations since the establishment cal and financial crisis faced by a number of EU of the Islamic Republic, Molavi recalled the tense countries, there is not much interest in mending relationship between the two countries in the early relations with Iran. The EU has, in general, joined years of the revolution, the improvement witnessed the U.S. in pursuing a policy of increasing sanctions under presidents Rafsanjani and Khatami, and on Iran due to its nuclear program, but relations can the deterioration of relations under Ahmadinejad. improve only through diplomatic means. Molavi examined the rivalry between the two coun- Michael Adler discussed the role of the tries for regional influence and the impact of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Arab Spring on this rivalry. Iran, he said, has lost its inspections of and reports on Iran’s nuclear pro- standing with Arabs since the upheavals that have gram. (He was speaking before the November swept the Arab world in the past year—a point on release of the IAEA’s most recent report on Iran’s which the Lebanese analyst and journalist, Rami nuclear activities). He noted that Iran’s claim it Khouri, who was in the audience, also commented. is cooperating with the IAEA notwithstanding— Khouri emphasized the significance of the Arab and despite the two rounds of talks between Iran Spring. For the first time, Arabs see themselves as and the P5+1 in Vienna in 2009 and in Geneva players and shapers of their own affairs. They are in 2010—the level of Iran’s cooperation with taking matters into their own hands. He, too, noted the IAEA has shrunk, and it is limiting access to that, in contrast to the last few years, when Iran was its nuclear facilities to IAEA inspectors. At their riding high in the Arab world, Iran’s pull today is November meeting, the IAEA Board of Governors dwindling, and the Iranians don’t have a role to play may take a hard line and say Iran is seeking nuclear in the future of the Arab world. weapons; it may absolve the Islamic Republic from Rouzbeh Parsi dealt with another important play- such an intention; or it may continue to cultivate an er in Iran’s foreign policy—the European Union. ambiguous position. 3 MIDDLE EAST PROGRAM OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES WINTER 2011 The Security State and its Fractured Elites Shaul Bakhash, Clarence J. Robinson Professor of History, George Mason University; and former Fellow and Scholar, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Iran has moved in a decidedly more authoritarian and godly values. This theme of right and wrong direction since the contested presidential elec- thinking was picked up by the leader, Ayatollah tions of 2009. Indeed, with its insistence on ideo- Ali Khamenei, in a series of speeches follow- logical conformity, adherence to the official line, ing the election. He made clear that members and the use of show trials and public confessions, of the ruling group could remain as part of the the regime has assumed many of the traits of the system only if they adhered to regime ideology.
Recommended publications
  • The Iranian Regime and the New Political Challenge
    Foreign Policy Research Institute E-Notes A Catalyst for Ideas Distributed via Email and Posted at www.fpri.org June 2011 ~MIDDLE EAST MEDIA MONITOR~ AN ENEMY FROM WITHIN: THE IRANIAN REGIME AND THE NEW POLITICAL CHALLENGE By Raz Zimmt Middle East Media Monitor is an FPRI E-Note series, designed to review once a month a current topic from the perspective of the foreign language press in such countries as Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, and Turkey. These articles will focus on providing FPRI’s readership with an inside view on how some of the most important countries in the Middle East are covering issues of importance to the American foreign policy community. Raz Zimmt is a Ph.D. candidate in the Graduate School of Historical Studies and a research fellow at the Center for Iranian Studies at Tel Aviv University. He is the editor of the weekly “Spotlight on Iran,” published by the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, www.terrorism-info.org.il/site/home/default.asp . On May 11, 2011 hardliner cleric, Ayatollah Mohammad-Taqi Mesbah-Yazdi, held a meeting with members of the conservative Islamic Coalition Party. Mesbah-Yazdi warned his audience against the strengthening of deviant religious thought in Iranian society. He claimed that it jeopardizes the concept of “the Guardianship of the Islamic jurist” ( Velayat-e Faqih ), upon which the Iranian regime has been based since the Islamic Revolution (1979). “If this current continues and one day we will see another Seyyed Ali Mohammad Bab 1...we should not be surprised.” 2 A few days later, Ayatollah Seyyed Mohammad Sa’idi, the Friday prayer leader in Qom, warned the “deviant currents” to stop their conspiracies or the people will annihilate them, as they did to [Abolhassan] Banisadr, 3 “the hypocrites” [a reference to Iranian opposition organization, the Mojahedin-e Khalq ] and “the leaders of the sedition” [a reference to the reformist opposition].
    [Show full text]
  • IRAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY the Islamic Republic of Iran
    IRAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Islamic Republic of Iran is a constitutional, theocratic republic in which Shia Muslim clergy and political leaders vetted by the clergy dominate the key power structures. Government legitimacy is based on the twin pillars of popular sovereignty--albeit restricted--and the rule of the supreme leader of the Islamic Revolution. The current supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was chosen by a directly elected body of religious leaders, the Assembly of Experts, in 1989. Khamenei’s writ dominates the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. He directly controls the armed forces and indirectly controls internal security forces, the judiciary, and other key institutions. The legislative branch is the popularly elected 290-seat Islamic Consultative Assembly, or Majlis. The unelected 12-member Guardian Council reviews all legislation the Majlis passes to ensure adherence to Islamic and constitutional principles; it also screens presidential and Majlis candidates for eligibility. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was reelected president in June 2009 in a multiparty election that was generally considered neither free nor fair. There were numerous instances in which elements of the security forces acted independently of civilian control. Demonstrations by opposition groups, university students, and others increased during the first few months of the year, inspired in part by events of the Arab Spring. In February hundreds of protesters throughout the country staged rallies to show solidarity with protesters in Tunisia and Egypt. The government responded harshly to protesters and critics, arresting, torturing, and prosecuting them for their dissent. As part of its crackdown, the government increased its oppression of media and the arts, arresting and imprisoning dozens of journalists, bloggers, poets, actors, filmmakers, and artists throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's New Assembly Chair Shows Who Really Won the Elections by Mehdi Khalaji
    MENU Policy Analysis / Policy Alert Iran's New Assembly Chair Shows Who Really Won the Elections by Mehdi Khalaji May 24, 2016 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Mehdi Khalaji Mehdi Khalaji, a Qom-trained Shiite theologian, is the Libitzky Family Fellow at The Washington Institute. Brief Analysis Despite weeks of reformist spin about the spring election results, the decision to name a notorious hardliner as head of the Experts Assembly shows that Khamenei is intent on making life even more difficult for President Rouhani's camp. hen members of Iran's fifth Assembly of Experts gathered on May 24 to choose a new chairman, they W confirmed what many already knew: that the recent election did not change the body's hardline fabric or the Supreme Leader's ability to exert his will over supposedly democratic processes. Since February, reformists and other supporters of President Hassan Rouhani have been claiming victory in both the assembly and parliamentary elections. The regime had taken pains to disqualify their favorite candidates before the race, so they produced an unorthodox list of "reformist" contenders that included many hardliners and conservatives. Yet today's inaugural assembly meeting indicates that this strategy will fail to influence decisionmaking in a body that could eventually be tasked with naming the next Supreme Leader. Veteran hardliner Ahmad Jannati won fifty-one of eighty-six votes at the meeting to become chair for the next two years. Rouhani's camp had hoped that former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, one of their most popular allies, would compete for the position, but he declared a few days ago that he would not be running.
    [Show full text]
  • Part Two: Administrative Organization, Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss
    Part Two Administrative Organization, Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account of Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran As at the end of 1390 (March 19, 2012) EXECUTIVE BOARD Mahmoud Bahmani (as of 02.07.1387) Governor Seyyed Hamid Pour Mohammadi (as of 18.07.1388) Deputy Governor Seyyed Mahmoud Ahmadi (as of 09.10.1388) Secretary General Seyyed Kamal Seyyed Ali (as of 21.04.1390 Vice-Governor for Foreign until 28.08.1390) Exchange Affairs Minoo Kianirad (as of 28.08.1390) Vice-Governor for Foreign Exchange Affairs Hossein Ghazavi (as of 29.07.1388 Vice-Governor for Economic Affairs until 23.08.1390) Bahman Mesgarha (as of 09.10.1388) Vice-Governor for Administrative and Training Affairs Hossein Habibi (as of 19.03.1388) Vice-Governor for Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Ebrahim Darvishi (as of 10.09.1390 Vice-Governor for Banking Supervision Affairs Hamid Borhani (until 21.04.1390) Vice-Governor for Foreign Exchange Affairs Seyyed Kamal Seyyed Ali (until 21.04.1390) Vice-Governor for International Affairs 138 MONEY AND CREDIT COUNCIL Mahmoud Bahmani (as of 02.07.1387) Governor of the Central Bank Seyyed Shamseddin Hosseini (as of 23.04.1388) Minister of Economic Affairs and Finance Ebrahim Azizi (as of 07.07.1388) President Deputy for Strategic Planning and Control Abdolreza Sheikholeslami (as of 12.05.1390) Minister of Cooperatives, Labor, and Social Welfare Mehdi Ghazanfari (as of 12.05.1390) Minister of Industry, Mine, and Trade Sadeq Khalilian (as of 11.08.1390) Minister of Jihad-e Agriculture Kurosh Parvizian (as of 08.05.1390)
    [Show full text]
  • The Intelligence Organization of the IRGC: a Major Iranian Intelligence Apparatus Dr
    רמה כ ז מל ו תשר מה ו ד י ע י ן ( למ מ" ) רמה כרמ כ ז ז מל מה ו י תשר עד מל מה ו ד ו י ד ע י י ע ן י ן ו רטל ( למ ו מ" ר ) כרמ ז מה י עד מל ו ד י ע י ן ו רטל ו ר The Intelligence Organization of the IRGC: A Major Iranian Intelligence Apparatus Dr. Raz Zimmt November 5, 2020 Main Argument The Intelligence Organization of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) has become a major intelligence apparatus of the Islamic Republic, having increased its influence and broadened its authorities. Iran’s intelligence apparatus, similar to other control and governance apparatuses in the Islamic Republic, is characterized by power plays, rivalries and redundancy. The Intelligence Organization of the IRGC, which answers to the supreme leader, operates alongside the Ministry of Intelligence, which was established in 1984 and answers to the president. The redundancy and overlap in the authorities of the Ministry of Intelligence and the IRGC’s Intelligence Organization have created disagreements and competition over prestige between the two bodies. In recent years, senior regime officials and officials within the two organizations have attempted to downplay the extent of disagreements between the organizations, and strove to present to domestic and foreign audience a visage of unity. The IRGC’s Intelligence Organization (ILNA, July 16, 2020) The IRGC’s Intelligence Organization, in its current form, was established in 2009. The Organization’s origin is in the Intelligence Unit of the IRGC, established shortly after the Islamic Revolution (1979).
    [Show full text]
  • Major General Hossein Salami: Commander-In-Chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps October 2020
    Major General Hossein Salami: Commander-in-Chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps October 2020 1 Table of Contents Salami’s Early Years and the Iran-Iraq War ................................................................................................... 3 Salami’s Path to Power ................................................................................................................................. 4 Commander of the IRGC’s Air Force and Deputy Commander-in-Chief ....................................................... 5 Commander-in-Chief of the IRGC.................................................................................................................. 9 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 11 2 Major General Hossein Salami Major General Hossein Salami has risen through the ranks of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) since its inception after the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran. He served on the battlefield during the Iran-Iraq War, spent part of his career in the IRGC’s academic establishment, commanded its Air Force, served as its second-in-command, and finally was promoted to the top position as commander-in-chief in 2019. Salami, in addition to being an IRGC insider, is known for his speeches, which are full of fire and fury. It’s this bellicosity coupled with his devotion to Iran’s supreme leader that has fueled his rise. Salami’s Early Years and the Iran-Iraq War Hossein
    [Show full text]
  • Mohammad Reza NAQDI
    Sanction catalogue 170.106.40.219 28.09.2021 10:32:18 Mohammad Reza NAQDI List Type Individual Gender Male List name SDN (OFAC) Programs (6) IRAN-EO13876 SDGT IFSR IRGC NPWMD IRAN-HR Remark Head of the Basij Names (8) Last name/Name NAQDI First name/Name Mohammad Reza Full name/Name Mohammad Reza NAQDI Type Name Last name/Name NAQDI First name/Name Muhammad Full name/Name Muhammad NAQDI Type Alias Quality Strong Last name/Name NAQDI First name/Name Mohammad-Reza Full name/Name Mohammad-Reza NAQDI Type Alias Quality Strong Last name/Name NAGHDI First name/Name Mohammedreza Full name/Name Mohammedreza NAGHDI Type Alias Quality Strong Last name/Name NAQDI First name/Name Gholamreza Full name/Name Gholamreza NAQDI Type Alias Quality Strong Last name/Name NAQDI First name/Name Gholam-reza Full name/Name Gholam-reza NAQDI Type Alias Quality Strong Last name/Name NAGHDI First name/Name Mohammad Reza Full name/Name Mohammad Reza NAGHDI Type Alias Quality Strong Last name/Name SHAMS First name/Name Mohammad Reza Full name/Name Mohammad Reza SHAMS Type Alias Quality Strong Citizenships (1) Country Iran Addresses (1) Country Iran Full address Iran Birth data (6) Birthdate Apr 1961 Birthdate 1951 to 1953 Birthdate 1960 to 1962 Place Tehran, Iran Country Iran Birthdate 1953 Place Najaf, Iraq Country Iraq Identification documents (1) Type Additional Sanctions Information -: Subject to Secondary Sanctions Updated: 28.09.2021. 05:15 The Sanction catalog includes Latvian, United Nations, European Union, United Kingdom and Office of Foreign Assets Control subjects included in sanction list.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran COI Compilation September 2013
    Iran COI Compilation September 2013 ACCORD is co-funded by the European Refugee Fund, UNHCR and the Ministry of the Interior, Austria. Commissioned by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Division of International Protection. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author. ACCORD - Austrian Centre for Country of Origin & Asylum Research and Documentation Iran COI Compilation September 2013 This report serves the specific purpose of collating legally relevant information on conditions in countries of origin pertinent to the assessment of claims for asylum. It is not intended to be a general report on human rights conditions. The report is prepared on the basis of publicly available information, studies and commentaries within a specified time frame. All sources are cited and fully referenced. This report is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Every effort has been made to compile information from reliable sources; users should refer to the full text of documents cited and assess the credibility, relevance and timeliness of source material with reference to the specific research concerns arising from individual applications. © Austrian Red Cross/ACCORD An electronic version of this report is available on www.ecoi.net. Austrian Red Cross/ACCORD Wiedner Hauptstraße 32 A- 1040 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43 1 58 900 – 582 E-Mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.redcross.at/accord ACCORD is co-funded by the European Refugee Fund, UNHCR and the Ministry of the Interior, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy
    Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs August 14, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32048 Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy Summary Since the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979, a priority of U.S. policy has been to reduce the perceived threat posed by Iran to a broad range of U.S. interests, including the security of the Persian Gulf region. In 2014, a common adversary emerged in the form of the Islamic State organization, reducing gaps in U.S. and Iranian regional interests, although the two countries have often differing approaches over how to try to defeat the group. The finalization on July 14, 2015, of a “Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action” (JCPOA) between Iran and six negotiating powers could enhance Iran’s ability to counter the United States and its allies in the region, but could also pave the way for cooperation to resolve some of the region’s several conflicts. During the 1980s and 1990s, U.S. officials identified Iran’s support for militant Middle East groups as a significant threat to U.S. interests and allies. A perceived potential threat from Iran’s nuclear program emerged in 2002, and the United States orchestrated broad international economic pressure on Iran to try to ensure that the program is verifiably confined to purely peaceful purposes. The international pressure contributed to the June 2013 election as president of Iran of the relatively moderate Hassan Rouhani, who campaigned as an advocate of ending Iran’s international isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mullahs, Guards, and Bonyads: an Exploration of Iranian Leadership
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Mullahs, Guards, and Bonyads An Exploration of Iranian Leadership Dynamics David E.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Politics in Iran MIDDLE EAST STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 1
    MIDDLE EAST STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 1 Nuclear Politics in Iran Edited by Judith S. Yaphe Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Nuclear Politics in Iran Nuclear Politics in Iran Edited by Judith S. Yaphe Nuclear Politics in Iran Edited by Judith S. Yaphe Institute for National Strategic Studies Middle East Security Perspectives Series, No. 1 Series Editor: Judith S. Yaphe National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. May 2010 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government. Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited. Portions of this work may be quoted or reprinted without permission, provided that a standard source credit line is included. NDU Press would appreciate a courtesy copy of reprints or reviews. First printing, May 2010 NDU Press publications are sold by the U.S. Government Printing Office. For ordering infor- mation, call (202) 512–1800 or write to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. For the U.S. Government On-Line Bookstore go to: www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/sale.html. For current publications of the Institute for National Strategic Studies, consult the National Defense University Web site at: www.ndu.edu. Contents Introduction. .1 “Atomic Energy Is Our Assured Right”: Nuclear Policy and the Shaping of Iranian Public Opinion Farideh Farhi. 3 Seeking International Legitimacy: Understanding the Dynamics of Nuclear Nationalism in Iran Bahman Baktiari. 19 Iran’s Tenth Presidential Election: Implications for Iran and the Region Anoushiravan Ehteshami .
    [Show full text]
  • Iran March 2009
    COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT IRAN 17 MARCH 2009 UK Border Agency COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION SERVICE IRAN 17 MARCH 2009 Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN IRAN, FROM 2 FEBRUARY 2009 TO 16 MARCH 2009 REPORTS ON IRAN PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 2 FEBRUARY 2009 TO 16 MARCH 2009 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ......................................................................................... 1.01 Maps .............................................................................................. 1.03 Iran............................................................................................. 1.03 Tehran ....................................................................................... 1.04 2. ECONOMY ............................................................................................ 2.01 Sanctions ...................................................................................... 2.13 3. HISTORY ............................................................................................... 3.01 Calendar ........................................................................................ 3.02 Pre 1979......................................................................................... 3.03 1979 to 1999 .................................................................................. 3.05 2000 to date................................................................................... 3.16 Student unrest .............................................................................
    [Show full text]