Uncovering the Protological Hermeneutics of George Mccready Price and Benjamin Warfield

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Uncovering the Protological Hermeneutics of George Mccready Price and Benjamin Warfield Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2017 Uncovering The Protological Hermeneutics Of George McCready Price And Benjamin Warfield Sergio L. Silva Andrews University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Silva, Sergio L., "Uncovering The Protological Hermeneutics Of George McCready Price And Benjamin Warfield" (2017). Dissertations. 1638. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/1638 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT UNCOVERING THE PROTOLOGICAL HERMENEUTICS OF GEORGE MCCREADY PRICE AND BENJAMIN WARFIELD by Sergio L. Silva Adviser: Martin F. Hanna ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: UNCOVERING THE PROTOLOGICAL HERMENEUTICS OF GEORGE MCCREADY PRICE AND BENJAMIN WARFIELD Name of researcher: Sergio Leandro Silva Name and degree of faculty adviser: Martin Frederick Hanna, Ph.D. Date completed: June 2017 Problem The problem this dissertation addresses is the protological hermeneutical impasse between George McCready Price and Benjamin Warfield over whether biblical protology should be interpreted literally or symbolically in response to the evolutionary theory. Method To identify, compare, and contrast the protological hermeneutics of George McCready Price and Benjamin Warfield, this dissertation adopts an interdisciplinary methodology that seeks to integrate historical theology, systematic theology, and exegetical-biblical theology. Conclusions The protological hermeneutical impasse between George McCready Price and Benjamin Warfield over the interpretation of biblical protology was caused by how they applied their views on epistemology. On the hermeneutical level (where ontology, metaphysics, and epistemology inform interpretation), Price held to the meaning of the biblical text interpreted through Scripture alone, and not based on external sources of protological knowledge. While Warfield held that Scripture is “the end of all strife,” he held to an interpretation of the biblical text contingent on the interpretations of nature by mainstream science. This research indicates many similarities between these two thinkers, bringing to an end a two-decades-long misconception that Warfield’s views on science were superior to Price’s views on science. In fact, they held similar views on science (i.e., its definition, task, etc.). In addition, they both agreed that: God is not timeless and he communicates with humankind through reason; “the heavens and the earth” (i.e., the entire galactic universe) might have been created more than six thousand years ago; Genesis 1:2a is a description of the condition of the earth after the creation of inorganic matter and prior to the beginning of the creation week; the seventh day of the creation week is the foundation of the Sabbath (they disagreed on the actual day of observance––Saturday vs. Sunday); and they both understood the biblical flood in Genesis 6-8 as a historical event. This research also challenged the claim that Price is the founder of modern Scientific Creationism. This idea was popularized by two historians who wanted to link Price to Fundamentalism––a term generally used pejoratively––to delegitimize Price’s contribution to theology and to science, and to uplift Warfield. However, this research showed that neither Price nor Warfield are Fundamentalists. The research also showed that the current categorization of the Creationist Movement in the West is obsolete and needs to be updated. The Old Earth vs. Young Earth can no longer account for the views of proponents of biblical protology. The Undated Earth Creation Movement must be included in a landmark publication. Altogether, these findings can facilitate a renewed dialogue about the relationship between theology and science in the writings of Price and Warfield, their interpretations of biblical protology, the history of the Creationist Movement in the West, and the contributions of their protological hermeneutics to contemporary Christian theology. Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary UNCOVERING THE PROTOLOGICAL HERMENEUTICS OF GEORGE MCCREADY PRICE AND BENJAMIN WARFIELD A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Sergio L. Silva June 2017 ©Copyright by Sergio Silva 2017 All Rights Reserved UNCOVERING THE PROTOLOGICAL HERMENEUTICS OF GEORGE MCCREADY PRICE AND BENJAMIN WARFIELD A dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy by Sergio Leandro Silva APPROVAL BY THE COMMITTEE: Faculty Adviser Director of Ph.D./Th.D. Programs Martin Hanna Thomas Shepherd Associate Professor of Theology Richard M. Davidson Dean, SDA Theological Seminary Professor of Old Testament Jiri Moskala John T. Baldwin Professor of Theology Cedric Vine Associate Professor of New Testament Warren Johns, PhD, MS, MLS, MDiv Date approved Theological Librarian (retired) Loma Linda University iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ...................................... vii LIST OF ABREVIATIONS ................................ viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ................................... x Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION .................................. 1 Historical Background .............................. 3 Statement of the Problem ............................ 12 Statement of Purpose .............................. 12 Justification .................................... 12 Methodology ................................... 14 Conceptual Framework ............................. 18 Delimitations ................................... 20 2. RELIGIOUS CONDITIONS IN AMERICA FROM THE MID-NINETEENTH TO THE EARLY TWENTIETH-CENTURY ..... 21 Science and Religion Dialogue ......................... 26 Genesis and Geology ............................ 27 Genesis and Biology ............................ 32 The Emergence of American Fundamentalism ................ 36 Defining Fundamentalism ......................... 39 Popular Creationist Movements and Models ................. 51 Old Earth Creation Movement ...................... 51 Gap Creation Model ........................... 52 Active Gap Theory (Creation-Ruin-Restoration) .......... 53 Passive Gap Theory (Absolute Creation + Life on Earth) ..... 55 Theistic Evolution Model ........................ 56 Young Earth Creation Movement ..................... 57 YEC Rejectionist Interpretation (Fundamentalist) ......... 58 YEC Inclusivist Interpretation (Non-fundamentalist) ....... 64 Undated Earth Creation Movement .................... 65 Dynamic Creation Model ........................ 66 Summary ...................................... 70 iv 3. THE PROTOLOGICAL HERMENEUTIC OF GEORGE MCCREADY PRICE (1870–1963) ................................. 74 Biographic Outlook ................................ 75 Early Years .................................. 75 Education ................................... 76 Publications ................................. 81 Theological and Philosophical Influences ................... 85 Scripture ................................... 86 Evolutionary Theory ............................ 95 Uniformitarianism as Premise of Darwinism ........... 103 Gradual Succession as Premise of Darwinism .......... 107 Spontaneous Generation as Premise of Darwinism ....... 113 Fundamentalism .............................. 118 Ellen G. White ............................... 121 Descriptive Analysis of Price’s Understanding on Protology ...... 125 The “beginning” in Genesis 1:1 ..................... 125 The Meaning of tohu wabohu in Genesis 1:2 ............. 130 The Meaning of yom in Genesis 1:3-2:4a ............... 132 The Seventh Day in Genesis 2:2-3 ................... 134 The Biblical Flood in Genesis 6-8 ................... 137 Descriptive Analysis of Price’s Protological Hermeneutic ........ 142 The Material and the Teleological Levels ............... 144 The Hermeneutical Level ........................ 146 Ontological Views: Price’s Concept of Reality ......... 147 Metaphysical Views: Price’s Principles of Articulation ..... 152 Epistemological Views: Price’s Foundation of Knowledge .. 154 Summary ..................................... 160 4. THE PROTOLOGICAL HERMENEUTIC OF BENJAMIN WARFIELD (1851–1921) ............................. 166 Biographical Perspectives ........................... 167 Early Years ................................. 167 Education and Scholarly Career ..................... 168 Publications ................................ 169 Theological and Philosophical Influences .................. 171 John Calvin ................................ 172 Scottish Common Sense Realism .................... 178 Westminster Confession of Faith .................... 182 Charles Hodge ............................... 185 The Evolutionary Theory ........................ 191 Modern Science ................................. 203 Fundamentalism ................................. 208 Descriptive Analysis of Warfield’s Interpretation of Protology ..... 210 The “beginning” in Genesis
Recommended publications
  • Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals
    UNDERSTANDING THE INTELLIGENT DESIGN CREATIONIST MOVEMENT: ITS TRUE NATURE AND GOALS A POSITION PAPER FROM THE CENTER FOR INQUIRY OFFICE OF PUBLIC POLICY AUTHOR: BARBARA FORREST, Ph.D. Reviewing Committee: Paul Kurtz, Ph.D.; Austin Dacey, Ph.D.; Stuart D. Jordan, Ph.D.; Ronald A. Lindsay, J. D., Ph.D.; John Shook, Ph.D.; Toni Van Pelt DATED: MAY 2007 ( AMENDED JULY 2007) Copyright © 2007 Center for Inquiry, Inc. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for noncommercial, educational purposes, provided that this notice appears on the reproduced materials, the full authoritative version is retained, and copies are not altered. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the Center for Inquiry, Inc. Table of Contents Section I. Introduction: What is at stake in the dispute over intelligent design?.................. 1 Section II. What is the intelligent design creationist movement? ........................................ 2 Section III. The historical and legal background of intelligent design creationism ................ 6 Epperson v. Arkansas (1968) ............................................................................ 6 McLean v. Arkansas (1982) .............................................................................. 6 Edwards v. Aguillard (1987) ............................................................................. 7 Section IV. The ID movement’s aims and strategy .............................................................. 9 The “Wedge Strategy” .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ron Numbers Collection-- the Creationists
    Register of the Ron Numbers Collection-- The Creationists Collection 178 Center for Adventist Research James White Library Andrews University Berrien Springs, Michigan 49104-1400 1992, revised 2007 Ron Numbers Collection--The Creationists (Collection 178) Scope and Content This collection contains the records used as resource material for the production of Dr. Numbers' book, The Creationists, published in 1992. This book documents the development of the creationist movement in the face of the growing tide of evolution. The bulk of the collection dates from the 20th century and covers most of the prominent, individual creationists and pro-creation groups of the late 19th and 20th century primarily in the United States, and secondarily, those in England, Australia, and Canada. Among the types of records included are photocopies of articles and other publications, theses, interview tapes and transcripts, and official publications of various denominations. One of the more valuable contributions of this collection is the large quantity of correspondence of prominent individuals. These records are all photocopies. A large section contains documentation related to Seventh-day Adventist creationists. Adventists were some of the leading figures in the creationist movement, and foremost among this group is George McCready Price. The Adventist Heritage Center holds a Price collection. The Numbers collection contributes additional correspondence and other documentation related to Price. Arrangement Ron Numbers organized this collection for the purpose of preparing his book manuscript, though the book itself is not organized in this way. Dr. Numbers suggested his original arrangement be retained. While the collection is arranged in its original order, the outline that follows may be of help to some researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Apologetic Resources
    APOLOGETIC RESOURCES A Young Earth ministry perspective, namely contrasting Scripture to true science now and during the ages. By Dr. Jim Pagels [email protected] 9/2016 Editor Dr. John Fricke, Emeritus Professor of Biology, Concordia University, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Copyright This book is offered as an educational resource on a no cost basis. Contents are not to be reproduced for the purpose of sale. Note that all Scriptural passages are taken from the English Standard Version. 1 I HAVE NO GREATER JOY THAN TO HEAR THAT MY CHILDREN WALK IN THE TRUTH III JOHN 1:4 Forward - Although there is much young Earth information available from commercial sources and on the internet, it was the impression of this writer that no resource that deals with basic topical issues correlating the young Earth philosophy and science exists for professional church workers. To this end, Apologetic Resources is being offered. Intended Audience – The intended audience of this reference material is primarily use by professional church workers, i.e., teachers, pastors, youth workers, etc., namely those who choose to uphold the literal interpretation of Genesis and the inerrancy of Holy Scripture. The focus in this regard is Young Earth Creationism and the catastrophic nature of the global Genesis Flood keeping in mind that Genesis 1-11 is foundational to most of the significant doctrines of Holy Scripture. Of course, laymen may well also find this reference a valuable resource. There is obviously a realistic interplay between Scripture, apologetics and true science. The goal of this document is to provide clarity to this interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Creation-Evolution Debate in Public Life
    MAPPING THE CREATION-EVOLUTION DEBATE IN PUBLIC LIFE by ANDREW JUDSON HART (Under the Direction of Edward Panetta) ABSTRACT Evolution versus creation is a divisive issue as religion is pitted against science in public discourse. Despite mounting scientific evidence in favor of evolution and legal decisions against the teaching of creationism in public schools, the number of advocates who still argue for creationist teaching in the science curriculum of public schools remains quite large. Public debates have played a key role in the creationist movement, and this study examines public debates between creationists and evolutionists over thirty years to track trends and analyze differences in arguments and political style in an attempt to better understand why creationism remains salient with many in the American public. INDEX WORDS: Creation; Evolution; Public Debate; Argumentation; Political Style; Bill Nye MAPPING THE CREATION-EVOLUTION DEBATE IN PUBLIC LIFE by ANDREW JUDSON HART B.A., The University of Georgia, 2010 B.S.F.R., The University of Georgia, 2010 M.A.T., The University of Georgia, 2014 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2016 © 2016 Andrew Judson Hart All Rights Reserved MAPPING THE CREATION-EVOLUTION DEBATE IN PUBLIC LIFE by ANDREW JUDSON HART Major Professor: Edward Panetta Committee: Barbara Biesecker Thomas Lessl Electronic Version Approved: Suzanne Barbour Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2016 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without Dr. Ed Panetta pushing me down the path to study the creation-evolution debates and his work with me on this through the many drafts and edits.
    [Show full text]
  • Creation and Evolution: What Should We Teach?
    Creation and Evolution: What Should We Teach? Author: Eugenie C. Scott, Director Affiliation: National Center for Science Education Bio: Dr. Eugenie C. Scott is Executive Director of the National Center for Science Education, Inc., a not-for-profit membership organization of scientists, teachers, and others that works to improve the teaching of evolution and of science as a way of knowing. It opposes the teaching of “scientific” creationism and other religiously based views in science classes. A former college professor, Dr. Scott lectures widely and is called upon by the press and other media to explain science and evolution to the general public. Scott is the author of the 2004 book, Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction, and has served as president of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists. Scott has been honored by both scientists and educators by being awarded the National Science Board Public Service Award, the AIBS Outstanding Service Award, the Geological Society of America Public Service Award, and the California Science Teachers Association Distinguished Service Award. She holds a Ph.D. in physical anthropology from the University of Missouri, an honorary D.Sc. from McGill University, and an honorary Doctor of Science from Ohio State University. Abstract: In this essay, I sketch an overview of the foundations of the creation/evolution debate in the United States today. Evolution is rejected by many Americans because it conflicts with their religious views. This conflict may occur because evolution is not compatible with biblical literalism, or because evolution creates other problems in Christian theology. Most Americans do not belong to Christian traditions that require a literal interpretation of the Bible; in addition, there is a long tradition of accommodation of evolution and science to Christian theology.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Washington University St. Louis: Open Scholarship Washington University Law Review Volume 83 Issue 1 2005 Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution Matthew J. Brauer Princeton University Barbara Forrest Southeastern Louisiana University Steven G. Gey Florida State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Education Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Religion Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Matthew J. Brauer, Barbara Forrest, and Steven G. Gey, Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution, 83 WASH. U. L. Q. 1 (2005). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol83/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Washington University Law Quarterly VOLUME 83 NUMBER 1 2005 IS IT SCIENCE YET?: INTELLIGENT DESIGN CREATIONISM AND THE CONSTITUTION MATTHEW J. BRAUER BARBARA FORREST STEVEN G. GEY* TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ORIGINS Genesis 1-11 Universe: Origin of the Universe (Part 2)
    ORIGINS Genesis 1-11 Universe: Origin of the Universe (Part 2) James River Community Church David Curfman February ² May 2013 Universe: Genesis 1:1-5 (Day One) y How should we interpret Genesis Chapter 1? y Does it matter? y http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4uqst c3_pc y Meaning hinges on meanings of several words Outline 1. Genesis 1-11 (Introduction) 2. Genesis 1:1-31 (Universe Part 1) ² Big Bang Model 3. Genesis 1:1-5 (Universe Part 2) ² Old and Young Earth Models 4. Genesis 1: 3-12 (Earth) ² Dating methods 5. Genesis 1:13-25 (Plants and Animals) ² Evolution 6. Genesis 1:26-31 (Man ² male and female) 7. Genesis 1:32-2:4a (Rest, the week, Sabbath) 8. Genesis 2:4b-2:24 (Man and Woman, Garden of Eden & Marriage) 9. Genesis 3-5:1a (Sin & Curse) 10. Genesis 5:1b-6:9a (Decay) 11. Genesis 6:9b ² 10:1a (Flood & Justice) 12. Genesis 10:1b -12:4 (Nations and Languages) Universe: Objectives y Examine Genesis 1:1-5 from three interpretations y Young earth y Old earth ² Progressive Creation y Old earth ² Gap Theory y Understand the Hebrew words used in Genesis y Understand the interpretation of those words in order to arrive at the two perspectives y Impacts on interpreting the rest of Scripture y There will be no winner or loser today! Universe: What do others say? y ~150 AD ² Referred to Psalm 90:4 and 2 Peter 3:8 to support their views that the creation "days" in Genesis 1 were not 24 hours long, but a "thousand years" in duration.
    [Show full text]
  • Burdick, Clifford Leslie (1894–1992)
    Burdick, Clifford Leslie (1894–1992) JAMES L. HAYWARD James L. Hayward, Ph.D. (Washington State University), is a professor emeritus of biology at Andrews University where he taught for 30 years. He is widely published in literature dealing with ornithology, behavioral ecology, and paleontology, and has contributed numerous articles to Adventist publications. His book, The Creation-Evolution Controversy: An Annotated Bibliography (Scarecrow Press, 1998), won a Choice award from the American Library Association. He also edited Creation Reconsidered (Association of Adventist Forums, 2000). Clifford Leslie Burdick, a Seventh-day Adventist consulting geologist, was an outspoken defender of young earth creationism and involved in the search for Noah’s Ark. Many of his claims were sensationalist and later discredited. Early Life and Education Born in 1894, Burdick was a graduate of the Seventh Day Baptist Milton College of Wisconsin. After accepting the Seventh-day Adventist message, Burdick enrolled at Emmanuel Missionary College (EMC, now Andrews University) in hopes of becoming a missionary. There he met the prominent creationist George McCready Price who inspired Burdick’s Clifford Leslie Burdick. interest in “Flood geology.”1 From Youth's Instructor, July 11, 1967 In 1922 Burdick submitted a thesis to EMC entitled “The Sabbath: Its Development in America,” which he later claimed earned him a Master of Arts degree in theology. Records show, however, that he never received a degree at EMC. He also claimed to have received a master’s degree in geology from the University of Wisconsin. Although he did complete several courses in geology there, he failed his oral exams and thus was denied a degree.2 During the 1950s Burdick took courses in geology and paleontology at the University of Arizona with plans to earn a PhD.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Page
    Contents Page Adventists and Genesis The Primary Time Theory Refuted By Paul Nethercott 2008 Contents Introduction Jehovah Witness Viewpoint Seventh Day Adventist Viewpoint The Age Of the Earth Is the Age Of Mankind Scientific Contradictions To The Book Of Genesis No Gap Between Genesis 1:1 and 1:3 Radioactive Dating Is Whole Rock Dating Radioactive Dating And Fossil Ages Radioactive Dating Of ‘Pre‐Cambrian’ Rocks Genesis Versus Radio‐Active Dating Chronology Controversy Over Radiometric Dating Methods The Days Of Creation Are Literal 24 Hour Days Ellen G. Whites Comments Gunter Faure Brent Dalrymple History Of Modern Creationism The Biblical Account Of Origins In the Beginning Where Did the Light on the First Day Come From? Light On The First Day Of Creation Loma Linda University Conclusions References www.CreationOnTheWeb.org Adventists And Genesis 1 Introduction The Men Behind The Idea The Founders Of The Primary Time Theory Pastor Russell Judge Rutherford Nathan Homer Knorr Jehovah’s Witnesses The Bible does not say how long a period elapsed between the beginning when God created the heaven and the earth, and the Jehovah’s Witnesses beginning of the creative week used in perfecting it for man: nor do Long before the beginning of those Jehovah’s Witnesses geologists agree amongst seven days the molten mass had “In the beginning God created the heavens and the themselves as to the period of this thrown off great quantities of mineral interval‐‐a few extremists indulge in Earth.” (Genesis 1:1) Just how long ago the starry substances in vapor form, and these heavens and the earth were created is not stated In wild speculations of millions of had formed into rings around the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Price, George Mccready (1870–1963)
    Price, George McCready (1870–1963) JAMES L. HAYWARD James L. Hayward, Ph.D. (Washington State University), is a professor emeritus of biology at Andrews University where he taught for 30 years. He is widely published in literature dealing with ornithology, behavioral ecology, and paleontology, and has contributed numerous articles to Adventist publications. His book, The Creation-Evolution Controversy: An Annotated Bibliography (Scarecrow Press, 1998), won a Choice award from the American Library Association. He also edited Creation Reconsidered (Association of Adventist Forums, 2000). George Edward (McCready) Price was a Canadian writer and educator who served in a variety of capacities within the Seventh-day Adventist Church. During the early twentieth century he taught in several secondary schools and denominational colleges. His most enduring legacy, however, is his defense of Flood geology and creationism—he authored two dozen books and hundreds of articles on the topic. He often is credited with founding the modern creationist movement. Early Life and Education George Edward Price (later George McCready Price) was born on August 26, 1870, in Havelock, New Brunswick. His father, George Marshall Price, a nominal Anglican, had established a homestead, George McCready Price. Butternut Ridge, where he farmed newly cleared land. Photo courtesy of the General Conference of Seventh-day He and his first wife bore nine children. After she died, Adventists Archives. he married a tiny woman, Susan McCready, the mother of young George Edward and his younger brother, Charles Luther, born in 1872. The senior Price was not an overly religious man, but he enjoyed listening to Susan read from the Bible each morning.1 Susan McCready Price came from a literary family, including relatives who were newspaper editors in Saint John and Fredericton, New Brunswick.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh-Day Adventist Professional Organizations
    ~ of 1978 Annual CDunci1 SDA Profi ional ® _® ons A Quarterly Journal of the Association of Adventist Forums Volume 9, Number 4 A tury of A jJ • r' •onism 1978 GeOscience Field CDnference --- - -~---.--- __ __ E-__ o---,t4---- ~ ~ -- ----~~:~#']Dld------+~e ---~u:jJ "--F~~~rl---1~ Genesis 1 as Theo1CW SPECTRUM EDITOR Gary Land Eric Anderson Margaret McFarland History History Urban Planner Roy Branson Andrews University Pacific Union College Toledo, Ohio Ro berta J. Moore Raymond Cottrell LaVonne Neff EXECUTIVE EDITOR Journalism Theology Author Richard Emmerson Loma Linda University Loma Linda, California College Place, Washington Charles Scriven' Helen Evans Ronald Numbers EDITORIAL BOARD Theology Academic Dean History of Medicine Graduate Theological Union Southwestern Adventist College University of Wisconsin Roy Branson Ethics, Kennedy Institute Ottilie Stafford Judith Folkenberg MelvinK. H. Peters Georgetown University English Researcher Old Testament Atlantic Union College Washington, D.C. Cleveland State University Molleurus Couperus Physician Lawrence Geraty Edward E. Robinson Angwin, California EDITORIAL Old Testament Attorney SDA Theological Seminary Chicago, Illinois Tom Dybdahl ASSISTANT Fritz Guy Gerhard Svrcek-Seiler Journalism Nola-Jean Bamberry United States Congress Theology Psychiatrist SDA Theological Seminary Vienna, Austria Richard Emmerson English CONSULTING Jorgen Henrikson Betty Stirling Walla Walla College Artist Board of Higher Education EDITORS Boston, Massachusetts General Conference ofSDA Alvin L. K wiram Kjeld Andersen Eric A. Magnusson Chemistry Physician L. E. Trader University of Washington Lystrup, Denmark President Education Avondale College, Australia Marienhoehe Gymnasium, W.Germany Association ofAdventist Fonuns EXECUTIVE Of International Relations Corresponding Secretary Lake Molleurus Coupeurus Sean McCarthy Walter Douglas COMMITTEE Physician Undergraduate Church History President Angwin, California Columbia Union College SDA Theological Seminary Glenn E.
    [Show full text]
  • Beliefs About the Creation of the World Among Teachers in Adventist Schools in Australia and the Solomon Islands
    Avondale College ResearchOnline@Avondale School of Ministry and Theology (Avondale Theology Book Chapters Seminary) 12-27-2020 Beliefs About the Creation of the World Among Teachers in Adventist Schools in Australia and the Solomon Islands Kevin C. de Berg Avondale University College, [email protected] Robert K. McIver Avondale University College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://research.avondale.edu.au/theo_chapters Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation de Berg, K. C., & McIver, R. K. (2020). Beliefs about the creation of the world among teachers in Adventist schools in Australia and the Solomon Islands. In R. McIver, S. Hattingh & P. Kilgour (Eds.). Education as preparation for eternity: Teachers in Seventh-day Adventist schools in Australia and the Solomon Islands and their perceptions of mission. Cooranbong, Australia: Avondale Academic Press. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Ministry and Theology (Avondale Seminary) at ResearchOnline@Avondale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theology Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@Avondale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 350 Chapter 24 Beliefs About the Creation of the World Among Teachers in Adventist Schools in Australia and the Solomon Islands Kevin de Berg and Robert K. McIver Avondale University College Introduction The doctrine of Creation has always been of great importance to Seventh-day Adventists (SDAs), probably because of its connection to one of their crucial distinguishing beliefs—the seventh-day Sabbath (Ex. 20:8–11). For example, as he contemplates “Seven reasons why it really does matter what we believe about Creation”, Greg King states, The seventh reason why it matters what we believe about Creation is the Sabbath.
    [Show full text]