DOCSLIB.ORG

Analyses of the Fates of Satellite Tracked Golden Eagles in Scotland COMMISSIONED REPORT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analyses of the Fates of Satellite Tracked Golden Eagles in Scotland COMMISSIONED REPORT Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 982 Analyses of the fates of satellite tracked golden eagles in Scotland COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 982 Analyses of the fates of satellite tracked golden eagles in Scotland For further information on this report please contact: Professor Des Thompson Scottish Natural Heritage Silvan House 231 Corstorphine Road EDINBURGH EH12 7AT Telephone: 0131 316 2630 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Whitfield, D.P. & Fielding, A.H. 2017. Analyses of the fates of satellite tracked golden eagles in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 982. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2017. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Analyses of the fates of satellite tracked golden eagles in Scotland Commissioned Report No. 982 Project No: 015542 Contractor: Natural Research Year of publication: 2017 Keywords Golden eagle; satellite tagging; Scotland; juvenile dispersal; wind farms; grouse moor; persecution; illegal killing. Background The Cabinet Secretary for Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform requested a thorough investigation of the fates of satellite tagged raptors, especially golden eagles. This report provides a major review of the movements and fates of golden eagles satellite tagged during 2004 - 2016. Of 131 young eagles tracked, as many as 41 (31%) have disappeared (presumably died) under suspicious circumstances significantly connected with contemporaneous records of illegal persecution. These disappearances occurred mainly in six areas of the Highlands (predominantly in the central and eastern Highlands). Some, but not all, areas managed as grouse moors were strongly associated with the disappearance of many of the tagged eagles. Tagging revealed that the persecution of young eagles is suppressing the golden eagle population in the central and eastern Highlands, and hampering overall recovery from historic, widespread persecution. Wind farms were not associated with any recorded golden eagle deaths, and there were very few records of tagged young golden eagles near wind farms. Operations associated with tagging had no discernible adverse effects on the welfare, behaviour or survival of the birds. Main findings Purpose 1. This report addresses the question: is there a pattern of suspicious activity surrounding the ‘disappearance’ of many satellite tagged golden eagles? i Methods 2. The movements and fate of many raptors in Scotland are being studied through the use of satellite transmitters attached to birds. For golden eagles, tags were deployed between 2004 and 2016, with increasing activity in recent years, as transmitters have improved in reliability and ease of attachment. Studies are on-going on golden eagles, white-tailed eagles, ospreys, red kites, hen harriers, peregrines and kestrels. Many of these studies are undertaken by a range of individuals and organisations across the UK, and currently data are at varied stages of being prepared for publication. 3. This report details a comprehensive analysis of the fate of 131 satellite tagged golden eagles (tagged in the nest, and subsequently tracked). 4. Tag fates were cast into eight classes based on a combination of location data, transmitted engineering data and the results of searches for ‘downed’ birds or ‘dropped’ tags at and around the last transmissions’ locations: Still Tracking; Died Natural; Stopped Malfunction; Battery Drained; Dropped Not Suspicious; Dropped Suspicious; Killed (found dead, most were poisoned); and Stopped No Malfunction. 5. Tag deployments are summarised by type, fate-class, year and region (NHZ) of deployment. Last fixes of potentially or known ‘suspicious’ tag fates are illustrated by calendar month. Potentially ‘suspicious’ tag fates almost entirely involved the ‘stopped no malfunction’ class of tag. These fates, involving many birds, were potentially suspicious because of sudden cessation of transmissions but also because no bird or its tag was discovered at or around the location of the last transmission(s). 6. Spatial maps summarise over half a million locations recorded to 15 January 2017 from the transmissions received from the tagged birds in Scotland. Grid references for final fixes of all tags which were not still transmitting as of that last date are presented. Broad spatial patterns in the fates of tagged eagles 7. Tagged eagles ranged widely over most of upland Scotland (especially the Highlands). There was a broad association between last known fixes and the background density of utilisation from the tagged birds’ locations. At a finer scale, however, it was apparent that several potentially suspicious tag fates were unusually concentrated. 8. A cluster analysis of the final locations of ‘stopped no malfunction’ and known ‘killed’ tagged birds fell into two broad areas: a broad ‘Highland’ grouping (four clusters) distinctly central-easterly and heavily populated with relatively concentrated clusters and many records; and a more westerly, looser grouping with four clusters. 9. Within these groupings, six broad geographical clusters were identified, with the most intense concentrations of potentially or actually ‘suspicious’ records in the central/eastern Highlands. These clusters were indicative of an unusual concentration of potential or known suspicious final fixes from many tagged young eagles. This was indicative of external human influences, as no other factor could account for such concentrations. 10. The final locations of these ‘stopped no malfunction’ and killed birds’ tags were unexpectedly spatially connected, suggesting further a human influence. These 39 locations are referred to as ‘stopped no malfunction last fixes’ (snmlfs). There were up to 73 non-snmlf tags in these analyses. ii 11. Nearest neighbour distances (NNDs) were calculated between snmlfs and contrasted with NNDs for a ‘virtual’ set of last fixes drawn randomly from the locations of all tagged birds. Ten analyses were conducted, examining various alternative potential datasets to ensure that the results were robust. 12. The snmlfs were spatially clustered at up to five spatial scales in comparison to what was expected from randomly selected locations of last fixes. Thus, this clustering was not because birds spent more time in the areas where snmfls were recorded. The same results were apparent when the following were analysed: the snmlfs tags; the more reliable 70GPS/GSM tags; and when up to 20 of the 33 snmfls tags were assumed to have actually malfunctioned. Hence, even if many of the latter were undetected malfunctions (and so misclassified) the spatial clustering was still evident. 13. In marked contrast, for the non-suspicious tags there was no difference between their final fixes and randomly selected ‘virtual last fixes’. This provided a robust test of the approach, but also provided further evidence that the snmfls were spatially associated and thereby suspicious. 14. The presence of clusters of snmlfs indicated localised activities that increased the probability that a tag would cease transmitting in those locations. The results strongly indicated that this was due to human influences operating primarily in six clusters, mostly in the central and eastern Highlands. 15. In answer to the question ‘was there a suspicious pattern in the sudden failure to transmit for many tagged eagles?’ The answer was: ‘Yes’. Reliability of different tags 16. Other research deploying the same MTI GPS PTT model tags had not found the same level of the ‘stopped no malfunction’ fate class as recorded in Scotland. A large sample from the USA for golden eagles classified a low rate (c. 2 %) of ‘stopped no malfunction’ fate (the comparable rate for Scotland was about 25 times higher), but for both the USA and Scotland there was a very similar (low) rate of definitely identified malfunction fate (c. 2 %). 17. The MTI GPS PTT tags which formed the backbone of the present project appeared to be intrinsically reliable, similarly so in Scotland and elsewhere, with a very low rate of unexpected malfunction. 18. An analysis of ‘survival rates’ of Scottish 70GPS/GSM tags revealed that ‘stopped no malfunction’ tags had relatively poor ‘survival’ compared to other tags, and was below the tag manufacturer’s expected longevity of ≥ 3 years. Again, this was not consistent with sudden, failed tags suffering an undetected malfunction. 19. A few MTI GPS PTT tags classed as ‘stopped no malfunction’ may have been due to malfunction, but this number would appear to be very small, and not clustered. The results do not indicate a substantive contribution of ‘tag reliability’ to the scale and spatial pattern indicated by the many sudden, ‘stopped no malfunction’ tag fates in Scotland. iii Inferences on human influences on the fate of tagged eagles 20. The results consistently point to a particularly high level of human-caused interference with tagged eagles in Scotland. The following six points are relevant to the human related fate of tagged eagles: a) Physical harm (e.g. lesions and inflammation) and contribution to further disease and possible death through ill-fitting harnesses have been recorded in 22% of 18 red kites in England. However, these results appear illustrative of a specific problem through
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gills Bay 132 Kv Environmental Statement: Volume 2: Main Report
    Gills Bay 132 kV Environmental Statement: V olume 2: Main Report August 2015 Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission Plc Gills Bay 132 kV VOLUME 2 MAIN REPORT - TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Development Need 1.3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Screening 1.4 Contents of the Environmental Statement 1.5 Structure of the Environmental Statement 1.6 The Project Team 1.7 Notifications Chapter 2 Description of Development 2.1 Introduction 2.2 The Proposed Development 2.3 Limits of Deviation 2.4 OHL Design 2.5 Underground Cable Installation 2.6 Construction and Phasing 2.7 Reinstatement 2.8 Construction Employment and Hours of Work 2.9 Construction Traffic 2.10 Construction Management 2.11 Operation and Management of the Transmission Connection Chapter 3 Environmental Impact Assessment Methodology 3.1 Summary of EIA Process 3.2 Stakeholder Consultation and Scoping 3.3 Potentially Significant Issues 3.4 Non-Significant Issues 3.5 EIA Methodology 3.6 Cumulative Assessment 3.7 EIA Good Practice Chapter 4 Route Selection and Alternatives 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Development Considerations 4.3 Do-Nothing Alternative 4.4 Alternative Corridors 4.5 Alternative Routes and Conductor Support Types within the Preferred Corridor Chapter 5 Planning and Policy Context 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Development Considerations 5.3 National Policy 5.4 Regional Policy Volume 2: LT000022 Table of Contents Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission Plc Gills Bay 132 kV 5.5 Local Policy 5.6 Other Guidance 5.7 Summary Chapter 6 Landscape
    [Show full text]
  • Caithness County Council
    Caithness County Council RECORDS’ IDENTITY STATEMENT Reference number: CC Alternative reference number: Title: Caithness County Council Dates of creation: 1720-1975 Level of description: Fonds Extent: 10 bays of shelving Format: Mainly paper RECORDS’ CONTEXT Name of creators: Caithness County Council Administrative history: 1889-1930 County Councils were established under the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1889. They assumed the powers of the Commissioners of Supply, and of Parochial Boards, excluding those in Burghs, under the Public Health Acts. The County Councils also assumed the powers of the County Road Trusts, and as a consequence were obliged to appoint County Road Boards. Powers of the former Police Committees of the Commissioners were transferred to Standing Joint Committees, composed of County Councillors, Commissioners and the Sheriff of the county. They acted as the police committee of the counties - the executive bodies for the administration of police. The Act thus entrusted to the new County Councils most existing local government functions outwith the burghs except the poor law, education, mental health and licensing. Each county was divided into districts administered by a District Committee of County Councillors. Funded directly by the County Councils, the District Committees were responsible for roads, housing, water supply and public health. Nucleus: The Nuclear and Caithness Archive 1 Provision was also made for the creation of Special Districts to be responsible for the provision of services including water supply, drainage, lighting and scavenging. 1930-1975 The Local Government Act (Scotland) 1929 abolished the District Committees and Parish Councils and transferred their powers and duties to the County Councils and District Councils (see CC/6).
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Period
    150 YEARS OF THE PLOWMAN FAMILY IN AUSTRALIA THE PLOWMANS IN SCOTLAND Sinclair and Margaret Plowman and family arrived in NSW aboard the Sir Robert Sale in 1864. Sinclair was the youngest child of Donald Plowman and Mary Mowat who had lived near the town of Wick in County Caithness, in the northern most region of Scotland. Approximately one out of every seven immigrants to Australia in the 19th century were Scottish. They often left remote, agricultural regions in the Highlands and the Hebrides after experiencing the miseries of famine, disease, eviction and poverty. To them national identity was secondary to subsistence. They arrived under an Assisted Immigrants program and when in Australia saved with determination to buy their own land and establish themselves in profitable businesses. The purpose was to achieve what was almost impossible in their own country. Most place names occurring in the information about the Plowmans are within County Caithness and include Wick, Watten, Staxigoe, Thurso, Bilbster and Canisbay. A map of Caithness is included below. Staxigoe is to the north east of Wick and could be considered now as an extension of the town itself. Canisbay is a small coastal region immediately to the west of John O'Groats. Bilbster, the region where Donald and Mary Mowat and family were based is approximately 5 kms east of Watten on the road to Wick. The earliest information we have of our Plowman family in Wick comes from the Old Parochial Records, information provided by John Sinclair Plowman (1922-2012) and in the publication Wick and Watten Notables.
    [Show full text]
  • Gàidhlig (Scottish Gaelic) Local Studies Vol
    Gàidhlig (Scottish Gaelic) Local Studies Vol. 22 : Cataibh an Ear & Gallaibh Gàidhlig (Scottish Gaelic) Local Studies 1 Vol. 22: Cataibh an Ear & Gallaibh (East Sutherland & Caithness) Author: Kurt C. Duwe 2nd Edition January, 2012 Executive Summary This publication is part of a series dealing with local communities which were predominantly Gaelic- speaking at the end of the 19 th century. Based mainly (but not exclusively) on local population census information the reports strive to examine the state of the language through the ages from 1881 until to- day. The most relevant information is gathered comprehensively for the smallest geographical unit pos- sible and provided area by area – a very useful reference for people with interest in their own communi- ty. Furthermore the impact of recent developments in education (namely teaching in Gaelic medium and Gaelic as a second language) is analysed for primary school catchments. Gaelic once was the dominant means of conversation in East Sutherland and the western districts of Caithness. Since the end of the 19 th century the language was on a relentless decline caused both by offi- cial ignorance and the low self-confidence of its speakers. A century later Gaelic is only spoken by a very tiny minority of inhabitants, most of them born well before the Second World War. Signs for the future still look not promising. Gaelic is still being sidelined officially in the whole area. Local council- lors even object to bilingual road-signs. Educational provision is either derisory or non-existent. Only constant parental pressure has achieved the introduction of Gaelic medium provision in Thurso and Bonar Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TUNDRA UPPER LYBSTER, LYBSTER, KW3 6AT 30Th January 2018 HP528238/GD Terms and Conditions
    HOME REPORT THE TUNDRA UPPER LYBSTER LYBSTER KW3 6AT ENERGY PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE YouEnergy can use this Performance document to: Certificate (EPC) Scotland Dwellings THE TUNDRA, UPPER LYBSTER, LYBSTER, KW3 6AT Dwelling type: Detached bungalow Reference number: 7804-1005-6209-1638-1900 Date of assessment: 30 January 2018 Type of assessment: RdSAP, existing dwelling Date of certificate: 31 January 2018 Approved Organisation: Elmhurst Total floor area: 129 m2 Main heating and fuel: Boiler and radiators, dual fuel Primary Energy Indicator: 196 kWh/m2/year (mineral and wood) You can use this document to: • Compare current ratings of properties to see which are more energy efficient and environmentally friendly • Find out how to save energy and money and also reduce CO2 emissions by improving your home Estimated energy costs for your home for 3 years* £3,447 See your recommendations report for more Over 3 years you could save* £321 information * based upon the cost of energy for heating, hot water, lighting and ventilation, calculated using standard assumptions Very energy efficient - lower running costs Current Potential Energy Efficiency Rating (92 plus) 100 A This graph shows the current efficiency of your home, (81-91) B taking into account both energy efficiency and fuel costs. The higher this rating, the lower your fuel bills (69-80) C 73 are likely to be. (55-68) D Your current rating is band C (73). The average rating for EPCs in Scotland is band D (61). (39-54 E (21-38) The potential rating shows the effect of undertaking all F of the improvement measures listed within your (1-20) G recommendations report.
    [Show full text]
  • Highland Council Caithness and Sutherland Local
    HIGHLAND COUNCIL CAITHNESS AND SUTHERLAND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN MONITORING STATEMENT October 2014 (v2.2) (incorporating subsequent corrections to Section 13 to accurately reflect Section 12.3) 1 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................4 2 LINKS TO OTHER DOCUMENTS ................................................................................4 3 OVERVIEW OF THE CAITHNESS AND SUTHERLAND PLAN AREA..................6 4 POPULATION...................................................................................................................8 4.1 Current Population....................................................................................................8 4.2 The Age Profile of the Current Population............................................................9 4.3 Population Change ................................................................................................ 10 4.4 Migration to and from the Plan Area................................................................... 12 5 HOUSING - BACKGROUND ...................................................................................... 13 5.1 Housing Market Areas (HMAs)............................................................................ 13 5.2 Housing Stock ........................................................................................................ 13 6 PLANNING PRESSURE .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Caithness Profile Summary
    The Caithness Conversation Community Profile May 2013 Funded by RWE npower renewables i Glossary ....................................................................................... iv Introduction .................................................................................. x SECTION 1 – OBSERVATIONS BY FOUNDATION SCOTLAND ............. 1 SECTION 2 – THE PROFILE............................................................... 6 1 Geography and Administration ................................................. 6 2 Strategic Context ...................................................................... 8 3 Voluntary and Community Activity ......................................... 16 4 Population ............................................................................. 21 5 Economy ................................................................................ 26 6 Employment & Income Levels ................................................. 32 7 Education and Training ........................................................... 39 8 Transport and Access to Services ............................................ 43 9 Housing and Health ................................................................ 46 10 Natural and Cultural Heritage ................................................. 49 11 Caithness Profile summary ..................................................... 52 SECTION 3 – THE CAITHNESS CONVERSATION .............................. 54 1 Who participated in the Caithness Conversation? ................... 54 2 What was the methodology?
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Caithness, Sutherland & Easter Ross Planning
    THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL Agenda Item 5 CAITHNESS, SUTHERLAND & EASTER ROSS PLANNING Report No APPLICATIONS AND REVIEW COMMITTEE – 3 March 2009 11/09 Enforcement Notice for the Removal of Unauthorised Yurt/ Marquee/ Tent used for Residential Purposes at Croit Clais Na H-Airgh Bhig, Upper Lybster Report by Area Planning and Building Standards Manager SUMMARY Authorisation is requested to issue an Enforcement Notice to secure the removal of an unauthorised marquee/tent, also known as a yurt, that is being used for unauthorised residential purposes at Croit Clais, Na H-Airgh Bhig, Upper Lybster. The Recommendation is to grant authorisation to issue an Enforcement Notice to secure its removal. Ward Number 4 – Caithness Landward Landowners – Mr R and Mrs S Waterson, Rhinduie, Lybster, Caithness, KW3 6BW 1. PROPOSAL 1.1 Authorisation is requested to issue an Enforcement Notice to secure the removal of an unauthorised yurt/marquee/tent used for residential purposes. 2. PLANNING HISTORY 2.1 Following a verbal complaint, a letter was sent to the landowners Mr R and Mrs S Waterson on 29 October 2007 seeking clarification as to whether the site had been used for residential purposes. 2.2 A letter was received on 12 November 2007 from Mrs S Waterston indicating that they considered the Mongolian tent/yurt to be a temporary and moveable structure, being 6 metres wide and 2 metres high and made from wood and canvas. The structure is pitched on the ground and does not have a floor/foundation. It is not connected to any services and was being used as a shelter to get out of the elements whilst working on the croft.
    [Show full text]
  • TA 4: Landscape and Visual Amenity
    Environmental Statement Cairnmore Hill Wind Farm TA 4: Landscape and Visual Amenity TA 4.1: Glossary TA 4.2 Landscape Character Type Descriptions TA 4.3 Designated and Classified Landscapes TA 4.4 Residual Effects on Landscape Character Types TA 4.5 Residual Effects on Designated Landscapes TA 4.6 Wild Land Impact Assessment (WLIA) TA 4.7 Viewpoint Assessment TA 4.8 Residual Visual Amenity Assessment TA 4.9 Statistical Route Analysis Volume 4: Technical Appendices TA 4: Landscape and Visual Ramboll Cairnmore Hill Wind Farm Environmental Statement Volume 4: Technical Appendices Ramboll TA 4: Landscape and Visual Environmental Statement Cairnmore Hill Wind Farm Technical Appendix 4.1: Glossary Volume 4: Technical Appendices TA 4: Landscape and Visual Ramboll Cairnmore Hill Wind Farm Environmental Statement Volume 4: Technical Appendices Ramboll TA 4: Landscape and Visual Cairnmore Hill Wind Farm Environmental Statement RES Ltd Technical Appendix 4.1: Glossary Terminology Definition Terminology Definition The key aspects of the landscape which contribute to its appearance (previously Field Pattern The pattern of hedges and walls that define fields in farmed landscapes. composition), such as: Geographic Information Computerised data base of geographical information that can easily be updated and . Scale; System manipulated. Enclosure; The angle measured in degrees from the left most visible part to the right most visible . Diversity; Horizontal Angle Subtended part of any development. Texture; Aesthetic Aspects The elements of the landscape and/or their inter relationship which form the defining . Form; Key Characteristics components of the landscape. Line; The change arising for a landscape or visual receptor as a result of some form of .
    [Show full text]
  • 166 Rams and Females
    BLUE TEXEL 166 RAMS AND FEMALES Saturday 26th September 2015 Sale to commence at 12 noon (Judging at 10.30am) To be held at Borderway Mart, Rosehill, Carlisle, Cumbria, CA1 2RS All Risks Mortality Cover Available from 3 Months Buying or selling a ram today? We can arrange the right insurance for you... • All Risks Mortality (Death due to accident, illness or disease) • Competitive Premiums • Immediate Quote and Cover • Breeders Buy with Confidence, giving YOU the edge CAN YOU REALLY AFFORD TO TAKE THE RISK AND NOT INSURE? Talk to Carol today either before or during the sale day on 07703 672337 Carol Rickerby in-Livestock.co.uk in-Livestock is a trading name of H&H Insurance Brokers Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the FCA 1 Catalogue for the ANNUAL SHOW AND SALE OF 166 BLUE TEXEL Rams and Females (sold under the Blue Texel Sheep Society Rules and Regulations) comprising: 96 Females 9 Ewes, 51 Shearling Ewes, 36 Ewe Lambs 70 Rams 1 Aged Ram, 29 Shearling Rams, 40 Lamb Rams SATURDAY 26th SEPTEMBER 2015 JUDGING - 10.30am SALE – 12 noon Auctioneers Head Office: Borderway Mart Rosehill Carlisle CA1 2RS Telephone: 01228 406230 – Fax: 01228 406231 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.harrisonandhetherington.co.uk 2 IMPORTANT NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS SETTLEMENT & CLEARANCE OF STOCK Please note that all lots must be settled on the day of purchase Completion of a buyers slip is essential for parties who have not dealt with the company before New customers and agents wishing to purchase on behalf of another party must contact the companys main office 48 hours prior to a sale No Lots can leave the market without a ‘pass slip’ being issued by the main office Purchasers From Outside The United Kingdom Invoices will be raised in pounds sterling.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Non-Compliance of Condition 1 of 11-03671-FUL At
    THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL Agenda Item 6.1 NORTH PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE – Report No PLN/038/14 10 June 2014 14/01082/S42 : Mr Danny Miller – Bilbster Mains Farm. WATHEGAR, BILBSTER, WICK, CAITHNESS Report by Head of Planning and Building Standards SUMMARY Description : Application for non-compliance with Condition 1 of Planning Permission 11/03671/FUL for a 9 turbine wind farm (18MW) and associated infrastructure at Wathegar, Bilbster. Recommendation - GRANT amended planning permission Ward : 4 Landward Caithness. Development category : Major Application. Pre-determination hearing : none. Reason referred to Committee : more than 5 objections. 1. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1.1 The application seeks to amend the planning permission granted on 23 March 2012 to allow an increase on the approved turbine dimensions, from a tip height of 101m to 110m and rotor diameter from 80m to 92.5m. The proposed amendment will increase the potential output of the project by 3.9MW. This is equivalent to almost two turbines of the consented specification to the site which currently has the potential generating capacity of 18MW. 1.2 Condition 1 of planning permission 11/03671/FUL states: - The development shall be undertaken in accordance with the application submitted plans and the environmental statement except in so far as amended by the terms of this consent or as subsequently agreed in writing by the Planning Authority in consultation with SNH and SEPA. 2. SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 The site of the consented wind farm is approximately 8.4km west of Wick, 4km east of Watten and south of the A882 road. The total area of the site is 375ha although development will be on a much reduced footprint amounting approximately to 3.3ha.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Human Environment 8.1 Commercial Fisheries
    Moray Offshore Renewables Limited - Environmental Statement Telford, Stevenson and MacColl Offshore Wind Farms and Transmission Infrastructure 8 Human Environment 8.1 Commercial Fisheries 8.1 8.1.1 Summary of Effects and Mitigation 8.1.1.1 For the purposes of this assessment, salmon and sea trout fisheries in the Moray Firth are separately addressed to other commercial fisheries, as a result of their beinG located largely in-river (with the exception of some coastal netting) and beinG different in nature to the majority of marine commercial fishing activities. CHAPTER 8.1.1.2 This chapter presents an assessment of the likely significant effects of the construction, operation and decommissioning of the three proposed wind farm sites on commercial fisheries. 8.1.1.3 Information supporting this assessment has been collected from a data review and consultation as explained in Chapter 5.1 (Commercial Fisheries). 8.1.2 Summary of Effects Commercial Fisheries 8.1.2.1 As described in Chapter 5.1 (Commercial Fisheries) and supported in Technical Appendix 5.1 A (Commercial Fisheries Technical Report), the three proposed wind farm sites are principally located on scallop grounds, and to a lesser extent squid grounds. There is a very low level of whitefish activity. The site records moderate levels of fishing activity compared to grounds elsewhere in the Moray Firth, and relatively low levels of activity on a national scale. 8.1.2.2 The construction of Telford, Stevenson and MacColl wind farms will result in increasingly restricted access to fishing grounds within the site as the construction phase progresses.
    [Show full text]