Gills Bay 132 Kv Environmental Statement: Volume 2: Main Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
River Thurso Flood Protection Study Sgrùdadh Dìon Thuiltean Abhainn Theòrsa
01 River Thurso Flood Protection Study Sgrùdadh Dìon Thuiltean Abhainn Theòrsa Welcome to the public consultation event for the River Thurso Flood Protection Study. How can you provide your feedback? The purpose of the event is to bring you up to date with the work we’ve been doing and the list of options to mitigate flood risk we are considering. The Highland Council A questionnaire is available for you to leave your comments. would like your views on these options at an early stage. This will ensure the study Please browse through the information provided on the takes everything into account and identifies an appropriate way to manage fluvial and display posters. Our team is here to answer any questions coastal flood risks from the River Thurso and the sea. you may have. Why are we here? In 2011, SEPA produced the National Flood Risk Assessment which investigated all sources of flooding as well as the likely impact of climate change. The assessment identified that Thurso was potentially at risk of coastal and river flooding and further investigation was required. What have we done so far? Work to date has consisted of the following: • Joint probability assessment of coastal and fluvial flooding; • Coastal modelling to calculate wave climate and extreme sea levels; • Linked 1D/2D modelling of the River Thurso and coastal inundation; • Topographical surveys of the study area; • Stakeholder meeting with statutory bodies; • Environmental survey. At this point we want to present the baseline flood risk in the town and offer some potential solutions to protect vulnerable areas from future flooding. -
Caithness Livestock Centre Kw1 5Un Telephone : 01955 621363
Aberdeen & Northern Marts A member of ANM GROUP LTD. CAITHNESS LIVESTOCK CENTRE KW1 5UN TELEPHONE : 01955 621363 SPECIAL SALE OF STORE AND BREEDING SHEEP PRIME STOCK AND FEEDING EWES AND RAMS th MONDAY 29 OCTOBER 2018 SALE : 10.00 am TERMS OF SALE - CASH NOTICES SHEEP IDENTIFICATION AND TRACEABILITY REQUIREMENTS DOUBLE TAGGING REQUIREMENTS FROM 31 DECEMBER 2009 The new EID regulations require animals born or first identified after 31 December 2009 to be EID double tagged with the exception of animals intended for slaughter Tagging Requirements For both the single and double tagging requirements the tags must be applied within nine months of birth, or when they first move off the holding of birth if that is sooner, and must have the following information - Slaughter animals All animals intended for domestic slaughter within 12 months of age must be identified using a single electronic slaughter tag (batch tag). This has only the flockmark printed on the outside of the tag, and the flockmark and individual number programmed into the electronic chip Fully EID identified animals (born or identified after 31 December 2009 and kept for breeding or beyond 12 months of age) two identifiers, one electronic and one conventional - with ‘UK’ followed by a ‘0’, then your unique flockmark, followed by a five-digit animal number printed on the outside of the tag, and also programmed into the electronic chip Movement documents It is a legal requirement that all sheep must be accompanied with a properly completed and signed Scottish Government Movement Document when moving to the market to allow accurate notification of movements to SAMU Sheep Tagging Requirements 2015 From 1st January 2015 all sheep born before 1st January 2010 which are not already EID tagged should be upgraded prior to moving to market. -
The Rail User Express. We Continue with the Usual Roundup of News Items from Groups Around the UK. Please Keep Your C
September 2019 Welcome to the Rail User Express. RUX is published around the middle of each month. It may be forwarded, or items reproduced in another newsletter (quoting sources). Anyone may request RUX as an email attachment, or opt to be notified when it is posted on the Railfuture (Rf) website. There is no charge for either service. Following GDPR, Railfuture Membership now maintains both lists. Please advise if you no longer wish to receive the newsletter or link, or if you know of anyone who would like to be added. For further details of any of the stories mentioned, please consult the relevant website, or ask the editor for the source material. RUX congratulates Network Rail (NR) for delivering £98million of vital improvements over the late August Bank Holiday weekend. Blessed with fine albeit very hot weather, a 10,500 strong team worked round the clock to finish 448 projects on time, allowing a normal service to resume on the Tuesday. Some projects such as track renewal and the transfer of signalling control will have an immediate benefit; some will enable an improved timetable in December, while others have laid the ground for future developments. But all contribute to the Rf aim of a better railway. Well done! Roger Smith We continue with the usual roundup of news items from groups around the UK. Please keep your contributions coming: they are all gratefully received. Friends of the Far North Line FoFNL is still awaiting news of any improvements, which seems to extend back at least a couple of years. -
Caithness County Council
Caithness County Council RECORDS’ IDENTITY STATEMENT Reference number: CC Alternative reference number: Title: Caithness County Council Dates of creation: 1720-1975 Level of description: Fonds Extent: 10 bays of shelving Format: Mainly paper RECORDS’ CONTEXT Name of creators: Caithness County Council Administrative history: 1889-1930 County Councils were established under the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1889. They assumed the powers of the Commissioners of Supply, and of Parochial Boards, excluding those in Burghs, under the Public Health Acts. The County Councils also assumed the powers of the County Road Trusts, and as a consequence were obliged to appoint County Road Boards. Powers of the former Police Committees of the Commissioners were transferred to Standing Joint Committees, composed of County Councillors, Commissioners and the Sheriff of the county. They acted as the police committee of the counties - the executive bodies for the administration of police. The Act thus entrusted to the new County Councils most existing local government functions outwith the burghs except the poor law, education, mental health and licensing. Each county was divided into districts administered by a District Committee of County Councillors. Funded directly by the County Councils, the District Committees were responsible for roads, housing, water supply and public health. Nucleus: The Nuclear and Caithness Archive 1 Provision was also made for the creation of Special Districts to be responsible for the provision of services including water supply, drainage, lighting and scavenging. 1930-1975 The Local Government Act (Scotland) 1929 abolished the District Committees and Parish Councils and transferred their powers and duties to the County Councils and District Councils (see CC/6). -
Erection of 24 Wind Turbines at Limekilns Estate, Reay, Caithness by Infinergy
Agenda THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL 5.1 Item NORTH PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Report PLN/010/17 21 February 2017 No 16/02752/S36 : Infinergy Ltd Limekilns Estate, Reay, Caithness SUMMARY Description: Erection of 24 wind turbines (Limekiln Wind Farm) Recommendation: CONDITIONED RAISE NO OBJECTION Wards: 01 - North, West and Central Sutherland Development category: Major (Application under Section 36 of Electricity Act 1989) Pre-determination hearing: None Reason referred to Committee: Section 36 Application 1.0 Background 1.1 This application was reported to the North Planning Applications Committee on 10 January 2017. In advance of the item being presented, Members of the Committee agreed to defer the item to consider information presented to them in December 2016 by Scottish Natural Heritage as a member of the Peatland Partnership in relation to the tentatively listed World Heritage Site for the Flow Country. 1.2 Scottish Natural Heritage were asked, via the Scottish Government’s Energy Consents and Deployment Unit (ECDU), the following questions: 1. Why was the tentatively listed Flow Country World Heritage site not specifically referred to (and assessed as such) in SNH’s consultation response of 31 August 2016? 2. Without recourse to a full survey or assessment, what impact, if any, would the above proposed development have on the tentatively listed World Heritage Site? 3. Would the conditioned mitigation detailed in the SNH response for Caithness and Sutherland Peatlands SAC and the Caithness and Sutherland Peatlands SPA be sufficient for the tentatively listed Flow Country World Heritage site? (If not, why not and what would be required to mitigate the impact/s on the tentatively listed Flow Country World Heritage site?) 4. -
Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015
Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015 Proposed CaSPlan The Highland Council Foreword Foreword Foreword to be added after PDI committee meeting The Highland Council Proposed CaSPlan About this Proposed Plan About this Proposed Plan The Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan (CaSPlan) is the second of three new area local development plans that, along with the Highland-wide Local Development Plan (HwLDP) and Supplementary Guidance, will form the Highland Council’s Development Plan that guides future development in Highland. The Plan covers the area shown on the Strategy Map on page 3). CaSPlan focuses on where development should and should not occur in the Caithness and Sutherland area over the next 10-20 years. Along the north coast the Pilot Marine Spatial Plan for the Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters will also influence what happens in the area. This Proposed Plan is the third stage in the plan preparation process. It has been approved by the Council as its settled view on where and how growth should be delivered in Caithness and Sutherland. However, it is a consultation document which means you can tell us what you think about it. It will be of particular interest to people who live, work or invest in the Caithness and Sutherland area. In preparing this Proposed Plan, the Highland Council have held various consultations. These included the development of a North Highland Onshore Vision to support growth of the marine renewables sector, Charrettes in Wick and Thurso to prepare whole-town visions and a Call for Sites and Ideas, all followed by a Main Issues Report and Additional Sites and Issues consultation. -
Microsoft Outlook
Wright H (Hamish) From: MacLeod N (Neil) (MARLAB) Sent: 19 November 2019 15:52 To: Makela A (Anni) Subject: FW: Marine Licence application: St. Ola pier redevelopment, Scrabster (07075/07076) - consultation Hi Anni, Here is the Highland Council response in regards to Scrabster. I’ll catch you to speak about it shortly. Thanks, Neil From: Mark Harvey <[email protected]> Sent: 19 November 2019 15:47 To: MacLeod N (Neil) (MARLAB) <[email protected]> Cc: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]> Subject: Marine Licence application: St. Ola pier redevelopment, Scrabster (07075/07076) ‐ consultation Dear Neil Many apologies for the delay in providing this response. I have examined the submitted documents and focussed on those matters of relevance to the Highland Council its role as local planning authority. Consequently, I am satisfied that the transport and traffic impacts have been assessed appropriately by Transport Scotland and that issues of marine ecology can be properly considered as part of the marine licensing process in consultation with SNH, SEPA and other bodies. In terms of visual amenity, the proposal is considered unlikely to result in any significant overall material visual change to the harbour area as a whole. The one aspect where the authority has some concern is in respect of construction noise which will inevitably have some impact on the nearest residential properties for a period of time. Although the separation distances in this case are greater (250m – 500m), consultation responses received from my environmental health colleagues in respect of the Uig project on Skye are pertinent. -
Erection of One 500 Kw Wind Turbine at 550 M of Taigh Na Muir, Dunnet By
THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL Agenda Item 6.2 NORTH PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE – Report No PLN/048/13 21 May 2013 12/03638/FUL : R R Mackay ·& Company Limited Land 550M NW of Tigh na Muir, Dunnet Report by Area Planning Manager North SUMMARY Description: Erection of 1 no 500kW wind turbine with a height to blade tip of 79.6m, 55m to hub and a rotor diameter of 48m and ancillary works at Land 550M NW of Tigh na Muir, Dunnet. Recommendation : REFUSE Ward : 04 Landward Caithness Development category : Local Pre-determination Hearing : none Reason referred to commitee ; Local member request 1. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1.1 Application is made in detail for the erection of 1 no. turbine with a height to blade tip of 79.6 metres, a height to hub of 55 metres and a rotor diameter of 48 metres. The associated infrastructure includes turbine foundations; crane hardstanding; pole mounted transformer and associated cabling and an upgrading and lengthening of an existing 540 metre access track to site from the edge of the exiting private access area to ‘Tigh na Muir’. 1.2 A formal Screening Opinion was issued on 08 September 2011, advising that an Environmental Impact Assessment was not required. 1.3 It is proposed that the turbine and construction components will utilise the A836 Castletown to John O’Groats public road and the existing farm access. 1.4 The applicant has provided a number of supporting documents including a Supporting Statement, Site and Viewpoint Map, Photomontages, an Ornithology Appraisal, Technical Appendix, and Surveys. 1.5 Variations: Otter Survey Report Received 23 October 2012. -
Scottish Period
150 YEARS OF THE PLOWMAN FAMILY IN AUSTRALIA THE PLOWMANS IN SCOTLAND Sinclair and Margaret Plowman and family arrived in NSW aboard the Sir Robert Sale in 1864. Sinclair was the youngest child of Donald Plowman and Mary Mowat who had lived near the town of Wick in County Caithness, in the northern most region of Scotland. Approximately one out of every seven immigrants to Australia in the 19th century were Scottish. They often left remote, agricultural regions in the Highlands and the Hebrides after experiencing the miseries of famine, disease, eviction and poverty. To them national identity was secondary to subsistence. They arrived under an Assisted Immigrants program and when in Australia saved with determination to buy their own land and establish themselves in profitable businesses. The purpose was to achieve what was almost impossible in their own country. Most place names occurring in the information about the Plowmans are within County Caithness and include Wick, Watten, Staxigoe, Thurso, Bilbster and Canisbay. A map of Caithness is included below. Staxigoe is to the north east of Wick and could be considered now as an extension of the town itself. Canisbay is a small coastal region immediately to the west of John O'Groats. Bilbster, the region where Donald and Mary Mowat and family were based is approximately 5 kms east of Watten on the road to Wick. The earliest information we have of our Plowman family in Wick comes from the Old Parochial Records, information provided by John Sinclair Plowman (1922-2012) and in the publication Wick and Watten Notables. -
Gàidhlig (Scottish Gaelic) Local Studies Vol
Gàidhlig (Scottish Gaelic) Local Studies Vol. 22 : Cataibh an Ear & Gallaibh Gàidhlig (Scottish Gaelic) Local Studies 1 Vol. 22: Cataibh an Ear & Gallaibh (East Sutherland & Caithness) Author: Kurt C. Duwe 2nd Edition January, 2012 Executive Summary This publication is part of a series dealing with local communities which were predominantly Gaelic- speaking at the end of the 19 th century. Based mainly (but not exclusively) on local population census information the reports strive to examine the state of the language through the ages from 1881 until to- day. The most relevant information is gathered comprehensively for the smallest geographical unit pos- sible and provided area by area – a very useful reference for people with interest in their own communi- ty. Furthermore the impact of recent developments in education (namely teaching in Gaelic medium and Gaelic as a second language) is analysed for primary school catchments. Gaelic once was the dominant means of conversation in East Sutherland and the western districts of Caithness. Since the end of the 19 th century the language was on a relentless decline caused both by offi- cial ignorance and the low self-confidence of its speakers. A century later Gaelic is only spoken by a very tiny minority of inhabitants, most of them born well before the Second World War. Signs for the future still look not promising. Gaelic is still being sidelined officially in the whole area. Local council- lors even object to bilingual road-signs. Educational provision is either derisory or non-existent. Only constant parental pressure has achieved the introduction of Gaelic medium provision in Thurso and Bonar Bridge. -
Wind Farm at Bad a Cheo by RWE Npower
THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL Agenda Item 3.2 NORTH PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Report No PLN/080/13 17 September 2013 Erection of 13 wind turbines, hard standings, anemometer mast, wind farm control building, temporary construction compound, lay down area and access tracks at Achkeepster, Caithness. 12/02868/FUL: Bad a Cheo Wind Farm, RWE Npower Renewables Ltd Report by Head of Planning and Building Standards SUMMARY Description: The proposal is a 13 turbine wind farm development with installed capacity of 32.5MW located at a site approximately 15km south of Thurso and 19km west of Wick, in Caithness, adjacent to the A9(T). The operational Causeymire Wind Farm operated by RWE NRL, lies immediately to the north. The turbines will be a maximum of 105m to blade tip in height. Access will be taken directly from the A9(T). Recommendation: GRANT planning permission. Ward: 4 – Landward Caithness Development category: Major. Pre-determination hearing: None Reason referred to Committee: More than 5 objections. 1.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1.1 It is proposed to erect 13 wind turbines each of up to 2.5MW power rating (32.5MW in total) and associated infrastructure including control building, cabling, access tracks, watercourse crossings, hard standings, and a permanent wind monitoring mast. 1.2 The proposed wind turbines will have a maximum overall height of 105 metres to blade tip. No rotor diameter has been specified. A 60 metre high anemometry mast is proposed south of turbine 6. 1.3 A new site access will be constructed directly from the A9(T), south of the current Causeymire Wind Farm access. -
Housing Application Guide Highland Housing Register
Housing Application Guide Highland Housing Register This guide is to help you fill in your application form for Highland Housing Register. It also gives you some information about social rented housing in Highland, as well as where to find out more information if you need it. This form is available in other formats such as audio tape, CD, Braille, and in large print. It can also be made available in other languages. Contents PAGE 1. About Highland Housing Register .........................................................................................................................................1 2. About Highland House Exchange ..........................................................................................................................................2 3. Contacting the Housing Option Team .................................................................................................................................2 4. About other social, affordable and supported housing providers in Highland .......................................................2 5. Important Information about Welfare Reform and your housing application ..............................................3 6. Proof - what and why • Proof of identity ...............................................................................................................................4 • Pregnancy ...........................................................................................................................................5 • Residential access to children