Islands of the Californias

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Islands of the Californias $10.00 (free to members) VOL. 45, NO.3 • November 2017 FREMONTIA JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY SPECIAL ISSUE: Islands of the Californias 1 California Native Plant Society CNPS, 2707 K Street, Suite 1; Sacramento, CA 95816-5130 Phone: (916) 447-2677 • Fax: (916) 447-2727 FREMONTIA www.cnps.org • [email protected] VOL. 45, NO. 3, November 2017 Memberships Copyright © 2017 Members receive many benefits, including a subscription toFremontia California Native Plant Society and the CNPS Bulletin. Look for more on inside back cover. ISSN 0092-1793 (print) Mariposa Lily.............................$1,500 Family..............................................$75 ISSN 2572-6870 (online) Benefactor....................................$600 International or library...................$75 Patron............................................$300 Individual................................$45 John Knapp, Editor Plant lover.....................................$100 Student/retired..........................$25 Michael Kauffmann, Editor & Designer Corporate/Organizational 10+ Employees.........................$2,500 4-6 Employees..............................$500 7-10 Employees.........................$1,000 1-3 Employees............................$150 Staff & Contractors Dan Gluesenkamp: Executive Director Michael Kauffmann: CNPS Press Protecting California’s native Christopher Brown: Membership and Elizabeth Kubey: Conference Assistant flora since 1965 Sales Coordinator David Magney: Rare Plant Program Dir. Jennifer Buck-Diaz: Vegetation Ecologist Mark Naftzger: Webmaster Kate Cooper: Membership Coordinator Liv O’Keeffe: Marketing and Comms. Dir. The views expressed by the authors in Catherine Curley: Assistant Botanist, Rare Jaime Ratchford: Assoc. Veg. Ecologist this issue do not necessarily represent Plant Treasure Hunt Coordinator Becky Reilly: Engagement Strategist policy or procedure of CNPS. Julie Evens: Vegetation Program Dir. Steven Serkanic: Assistant Rare Plant Botanist Stacey Flowerdew: Senior Development Coordinator Kendra Sikes: Vegetation Ecologist Alison Colwell: Assistant Rare Plant Aaron Sims: Rare Plant Botanist Botanist Greg Suba: Conservation Program Dir. Cover Photo: Spring at Cuyler Kaitlyn Green: Assistant Rare Plant Kristen Wernick: Outreach Coordinator Harbor on San Miguel Island. Botanist Karen Whitestone: Conservation Analyst Photo by Morgan Ball. Laureen Jenson: Accounting & HR Brock Wimberley: Ops & Finance Dir. Chapter Council - Chapter Delegates Marty Foltyn: Chair Orange County: David Pryor, Thea Gavin Larry Levine: Vice Chair Redbud: Denise Della Santina Judy Fenerty: Secretary Riverside/San Bernardino: Kate Barr Alta Peak: Cathy Capone Sacramento Valley: Glen Holstein, Hazel Baja: César Garcìa Valderrama Gordon Bristlecone: Stephen Ingram San Diego: Frank Landis, Bobbie Stephen- North Coast Shasta Statewide Chapters Bryophyte: James Shevock, Paul Wilson son, Joe Sochor Channel Islands: Patt McDaniel, Andrea San Gabriel Mtns.: Gabi McLean Bryophyte Chapter Adams-Morden San Luis Obispo: Cathy Chambers, David Mt. Lassen Dorothy King Young: Nancy Morin Chipping Tahoe East Bay: Beth Wurzburg Sanhedrin: Vacant Sanhedrin Redbud El Dorado: Alice Cantelow, Susan Britting Santa Clara Valley: Judy Fenerty, Kevin Bry- Sacramento Dorothy Milo El Dorado ant King Young Napa Kern County: Dorie Giragosian Baker Valley Willis Santa Cruz County: Deanna Giuliano, Brett Linn LA/Santa Monica Mtns.: Snowdy Dodson Jepson Hall Sierra Foothills Marin East Marin: David Long Bay North Sequoia: Vacant San Joaquin Milo Baker: Liz Parsons Yerba Buena Santa Shasta: Vacant Clara Valley Mojave Desert: Timothy Thomas Sierra Foothills: Vacant Santa Cruz County Sequoia Monterey Bay: Nicole Nedeff, Brian LeNeve Bristlecone South Coast: David Berman Monterey Mount Lassen: Catie Bishop Bay Alta Peak Tahoe: John Roos, Brett Hall Napa Valley: Gerald Tomboc Willis L. Jepson: Mary Frances Kelly-Poh North Coast: Larry Levine San Luis Yerba Buena: Ellen Edelson Obispo Kern North San Joaquin: Jim Brugger Mojave Channel Islands San Gabriel Mtns. 2017 Board of Directors Riverside – San Bernardino Steve Hartman: President Gordon Leppig: Director Los Angeles – Orange Santa Monica Mtns. County Bill Waycott: Vice President Cari Porter: Director San Diego Gabi McLean: Treasurer Jean Robertson: Director South Coast Carolyn Longstreth: Secretary Cris Sarabia: Director Julie Clark DeBlasio: Director Vince Scheidt: Director Brett Hall: Director Johanna Kwan: Chapter Council Rep. Baja California David Pryor: Chapter Council Rep. CNPS members and others are welcome to contribute to this publication. Visit www.cnps.org/fremontia to learn more. Contents Introduction to this Special Issue on the Flora and Vegetation of the Islands of the Californias...................................................................3 By John J. Knapp and John M. Randall Remarkable Flora of the California Islands...................................................5 By Matt Guilliams, Benjamin Carter, Martha Lizeth Ceceña-Sánchez, Jose Delgadillo, Barbara Holzman, Steve Junak, Denise Knapp, Luciana Luna-Mendoza, and Sula Vanderplank Early Botanical Personalities of the Channel Islands.....................................12 By Steve Junak Resilience Of Unique Island Vegetation .....................................................18 By Thomas Oberbauer, Martha Lizeth Ceceña-Sánchez, Steve Junak, Denise Knapp, Lyndal Laughrin, Luciana Luna-Mendoza, Kathryn McEachern, Bryan Munson, Ken Niessen, Dirk Rodriguez, and Peter Schuyler Remarkable Recoveries and Fantastic Discoveries.......................................24 By Bryan Munson, Peter Dixon, Emma Havstad, Emily Howe, William Hoyer, Steve Junak, Denise Knapp, Luciana Luna-Mendoza, Kathryn McEachern, Sarah Ratay, Jon Rebman, Dirk Rodriquez, Peter Schuyler, Sula Vanderplank, and Dieter Wilken The New Baja California Pacific Islands Biosphere Reserve Sets A Conservation Benchmark: All Mexican Islands Are Now Protected....................................................27 By Alfonso Aguirre-Muñoz and Federico Méndez-Sánchez The Struggle for Recovery.......................................................................32 By Kathryn McEachern, Peter Dixon, Emma Havstad, William Hoyer, Denise Knapp, John Knapp, Luciana Luna-Mendoza, Bryan Munson, and Heather Schneider Restoration and Protection of the Archipelago’s Flora and Habitats: A New Era...........................................37 By David Mazurkiewicz, Josh Adams, Morgan Ball, Ryan Carle, Peter Dixon, Karen Flagg, Emma Havstad, Emily Howe, Bill Hoyer, John Knapp, Kathryn McEachern, Luciana Luna-Mendoza, Bryan Munson, Ken Niessen, Ken Owen, Julia Parish, Paula Power, and Andrew Yamagiwa The Future of California Islands Conservation in a Changing World.............................................................................44 By Denise Knapp, Donaxi Borjes-Flores, Peter Dixon, William Hoyer, John Knapp, Luciana Luna-Mendoza, Kathryn McEachern, Julio Hernández-Montoya, Bryan Munson, Paula Power, and John Randall Map courtesy of: 2 FREMONTIA INTRODUCTION TO THIS SPECIAL ISSUE ON THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF THE ISLANDS OF THE CALIFORNIAS John J Knapp & John M. Randall he islands off the Pacific coast of the states of mid-1800s. In some cases, they lost their lives doing it, California and Baja California Peninsula, from but their explorations provided early records of what the Farallones in the north to Isla Natividad in the islands looked like. the south (see map), are within the California Today most of the islands are managed for conser- TFloristic Province. Their shared flora is distinctive vation or include large areas that are protected. The and rich in endemic genera, species, subspecies, and Farallones are a National Wildlife Refuge, five of varieties not found on the mainland. Together these California’s eight Channel Islands are within Channel 18 islands are home to 1,239 native plant taxa. Island Island National Park, two others are managed by the vegetation types resemble those on the mainland, but U.S. Navy, 48 percent of Santa Catalina Island is man- island endemic taxa are prominent in most of them. aged the Catalina Island Conservancy, and 76 percent Unfortunately, these islands were severely damaged of Santa Cruz Island is owned and managed by The by human use within the past two centuries, and par- Nature Conservancy. In December, 2016 the Mexican ticularly by introduced animals—against which many government announced the establishment of the island endemic plants were poorly defended. As a Reserva de la Biosfera Islas del Pacifico (Baja California result, many endemic plants are now thought to be Peninsula Pacific Islands Biosphere Reserve) encom- extinct, have been reduced to the brink of extinction, passing 21 islands, including all of those within the or are extirpated from one or more islands. Fortunately, California Floristic Province (see Aguirre-Muñoz and botanists who recognized the extraordinary nature of Méndez-Sánchez article). the island flora collected specimens, described the The agencies and organizations responsible for vegetation, and identified endemic taxa starting in the these islands have had remarkable success in elimi- Above: Old-growth lemonade berry shrubs (Rhus integrifolia) nating the most damaging introduced animals, many which escaped nearly a century of overgrazing by sheep, dot the invasive plants and invertebrates. Plans are still in hillsides of East Santa Cruz Island, along with recovering coastal scrub. West Anacapa in the
Recommended publications
  • 2012 Planting Lines
    San Clemente Island Native Habitat Restoration Program Native Seed Collection, Propagation and Outplanting in Support of San Clemente Island Endangered Species Programs Under Contract With: Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest San Diego, California N68711 -05-D-3605-0077 Prepared By: Emily Howe, Korie Merrill, Thomas A. Zink. Soil Ecology and Restoration Group San Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, CA Prepared for: Natural Resources Office Environmental Department, Commander, Navy region Southwest, San Diego, CA Table Of Contents Table Of Contents ................................................................................................................ 2 Table of Figures ................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Native Plant Nursery ..................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Nursery Inventory .......................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Seed propagation ........................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Rainfall Data Collection ................................................................................................ 6 3.0 Seed Collection .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Artemisia Californica Less
    I. SPECIES Artemisia californica Less. [Updated 2017] NRCS CODE: Subtribe: Artemisiinae ARCA11 Tribe: Anthemideae (FEIS CODE: Family: Asteraceae ARCAL) Order: Asterales Subclass: Asteridae Class: Magnoliopsida flowering heads spring growth seedling, March 2009 juvenile plant photos A. Montalvo flowering plant, November 2005 mature plant with flower buds August 2010 A. Subspecific taxa None. Artemisia californica Less. var. insularis (Rydb.) Munz is now recognized as Artemisia nesiotica P.H. Raven (Jepson eFlora 2017). B. Synonyms Artemisia abrotanoides Nuttall; A. fischeriana Besser; A. foliosa Nuttall; Crossostephium californicum (Lessing) Rydberg (FNA 2017). C. Common name California sagebrush. The common name refers to its strong, sage-like aroma and endemism to California and Baja California. Other names include: coastal sage, coast sage, coast sagebrush (Painter 2016). D. Taxonomic relationships The FNA (2017) places this species in subgenus Artemisia . The molecular phylogeny of the genus has improved the understanding of relationships among the many species of Artemisia and has, at times, placed the species in subgenus Tridentadae; morphology of the inflorescences and flowers alone does not place this species with its closest relatives (Watson et al. 2002). The detailed phylogeny is not completely resolved (Hayat et al. 2009). E. Related taxa in region There are 18 species and a total of 31 taxa (including infrataxa) of Artemisia in southern California, all of which differ clearly from A. californica in habitat affinity, structure, or both (Munz 1974, Jepson eFlora 2017). Within subgenus Artemisia (as per FNA 2017), A. nesiotica from the Channel Islands is the most similar and was once considered part of A. californica ; it can be distinguished by its wider leaves with flat leaf margins (not rolled under).
    [Show full text]
  • Qty Size Name Price 10 1G Abies Bracteata 12.00 $ 15 1G Abutilon
    REGIONAL PARKS BOTANIC GARDEN, TILDEN REGIONAL PARK, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA Celebrating 78 years of growing California native plants: 1940-2018 **PRELIMINARY**PLANT SALE LIST **PRELIMINARY** Preliminary Plant Sale List 9/29/2018 visit: www.nativeplants.org for the most up to date plant list, updates are posted until 10/5 FALL PLANT SALE OF CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANTS SATURDAY, October 6, 2018 PUBLIC SALE: 10:00 AM TO 3:00 PM MEMBERS ONLY SALE: 9:00 AM TO 10:00 AM MEMBERSHIPS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRY TO THE SALE AT 8:30 AM Qty Size Name Price 10 1G Abies bracteata $ 12.00 15 1G Abutilon palmeri $ 11.00 1 1G Acer circinatum $ 10.00 3 5G Acer circinatum $ 40.00 8 1G Acer macrophyllum $ 9.00 10 1G Achillea millefolium 'Calistoga' $ 8.00 25 4" Achillea millefolium 'Island Pink' OUR INTRODUCTION! $ 5.00 28 1G Achillea millefolium 'Island Pink' OUR INTRODUCTION! $ 8.00 6 1G Actea rubra f. neglecta (white fruits) $ 9.00 3 1G Adenostoma fasciculatum $ 10.00 1 4" Adiantum aleuticum $ 10.00 6 1G Adiantum aleuticum $ 13.00 10 4" Adiantum shastense $ 10.00 4 1G Adiantum x tracyi $ 13.00 2 2G Aesculus californica $ 12.00 1 4" Agave shawii var. shawii $ 8.00 1 1G Agave shawii var. shawii $ 15.00 4 1G Allium eurotophilum $ 10.00 3 1G Alnus incana var. tenuifolia $ 8.00 4 1G Amelanchier alnifolia var. semiintegrifolia $ 9.00 8 2" Anemone drummondii var. drummondii $ 4.00 9 1G Anemopsis californica $ 9.00 8 1G Apocynum cannabinum $ 8.00 2 1G Aquilegia eximia $ 8.00 15 4" Aquilegia formosa $ 6.00 11 1G Aquilegia formosa $ 8.00 10 1G Aquilegia formosa 'Nana' $ 8.00 Arabis - see Boechera 5 1G Arctostaphylos auriculata $ 11.00 2 1G Arctostaphylos auriculata - large inflorescences from Black Diamond $ 11.00 1 1G Arctostaphylos bakeri $ 11.00 15 1G Arctostaphylos bakeri 'Louis Edmunds' $ 11.00 2 1G Arctostaphylos canescens subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Boating and Boater Activities in the Channel Islands: a Spatial Analysis and Assessment
    CALIFORNIA MARINE RECREATION Catamaran at anchor, Coches Prietos anchorage Private Boating and Boater Activities in the Channel Islands: A spatial analysis and assessment FINAL REPORT Prepared for: The Resources Legacy Fund Foundation (RLFF) The National Marine Sanctuary Program (NMSP) Prepared by: Chris LaFranchi1 Linwood Pendleton2 March 2008 1 Founder, NaturalEquity (www.naturalequity.org) Social Science Coordinator, Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary (CINMS) Email: [email protected] 2 Senior Fellow and Director of Economic Research The Ocean Foundation, Dir. Coastal Ocean Values Center Adjunct Associate Professor, UCLA www.coastalvalues.org Email: [email protected] Acknowledgments Of the many individuals who contributed to this effort, we thank Bob Leeworthy, Ryan Vaughn, Miwa Tamanaha, Allison Chan, Erin Gaines, Erin Myers, Dennis Carlson, Alexandra Brown, the captain and crew of the research vessel Shearwater, volunteers from the Sanctuary’s Naturalist Corps, Susie Williams, Christy Loper, Peter Black, and the man boaters who volunteered their time during focus group meetings and survey pre-test efforts. 2 Contents Page 1. Summary……………………………. ……………………………….. 4 2. Introduction …………………………………………………………... 18 2.1. The Study ………………………….…………………………….. 18 2.2. Background ………………………….…………………………… 19 2.3. The Human Dimension of Marine Management ………………… 19 2.4. The Need for Baseline Data ……………………………………... 20 2.5. Policy and Management Context ………………………………... 21 2.6. Market and Non-Market Economics of Non-Consumptive Use … 22 3. Research Tasks and Methods ………………………………………… 25 3.1. Overall Approach ………………………………………………… 25 3.2. Use of Four Integrated Survey Instruments …………….……….. 26 3.3. Biophysical Attributes of the Marine Environment ……………… 30 4. Baseline Data Set ……………………………………………………. 32 4.1. Summary of Responses: Postcard Survey Of Private Boaters….. 32 4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramirez Dissertation
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Comparative Ecophysiology and Evolutionary Biology of Island and Mainland Chaparral Communities Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5b7510px Author Ramirez, Aaron Robert Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Comparative Ecophysiology and Evolutionary Biology of Island and Mainland Chaparral Communities By Aaron Robert Ramirez A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology in the Graduate division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor David D. Ackerly, Chair Professor Paul V. A. Fine Professor Scott L. Stephens Spring 2015 Comparative Ecophysiology and Evolutionary Biology of Island and Mainland Chaparral Communities © 2015 by Aaron Robert Ramirez Abstract Comparative Ecophysiology and Evolutionary Biology of Island and Mainland Chaparral Communities by Aaron Robert Ramirez Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology University of California, Berkeley Professor David D. Ackerly, Chair The unique nature of island ecosystems have fascinated generations of naturalists, ecologists, and evolutionary biologists. Studying island systems led to the development of keystone biological theories including: Darwin and Wallace’s theories of natural selection, Carlquist’s insights into the biology of adaptive radiations, MacArthur and Wilson’s theory of island biogeography, and many others. Utilizing islands as natural laboratories allows us to discover the underlying fabric of ecology and evolutionary biology. This dissertation represents my attempt to contribute to this long and storied scientific history by thoroughly investigating two aspects of island biology: 1. the role of island climate in shaping drought tolerance of woody plants, and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Future Role of the University of California Natural Reserve System for Sensitive Plant Protection Under Climate Change
    Evaluating the Future Role of the University of California Natural Reserve System for Sensitive Plant Protection under Climate Change ERIN C. RIORDAN* AND PHILIP W. RUNDEL DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90095 USA *EMAIL FOR CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] WINTER 2019 PREPARED FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESERVE SYSTEM Executive Summary Description Protected areas are critical for conserving California’s many sensitive plant species but their future role is uncertain under climate change. Climate-driven species losses and redistributions could dramatically affect the relevance of protected areas for biodiversity conservation this century. Focusing on the University of California Natural Reserve System (NRS), we predicted the future impact of climate change on reserve effectiveness with respect to sensitive plant protection. First, we evaluated the historical representation of sensitive plant species in the NRS reserve network by compiling species accounts from checklists, floras, and spatial queries of occurrence databases. Next, we calculated projected climate change exposure across the NRS reserve network for the end of the 21st century (2070–2099) relative to baseline (1971–2000) conditions under five future climate scenarios. We then predicted statewide changes in suitable habitat for 180 sensitive plant taxa using the same future climate scenarios in a species distribution modeling approach. Finally, from these predictions we evaluated suitable habitat retention at three spatial scales: individual NRS reserves (focal reserves), the NRS reserve network, and the surrounding mosaic of protected open space. Six reserves—Sagehen Creek Field Station, McLaughlin Natural Reserve, Jepson Prairie Reserve, Landels-Hill Big Creek Reserve, Sedgwick Reserve, and Boyd Deep Canyon Desert Research Center—were selected as focal reserves for analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Miguel Island Trail Guide Timhaufphotography.Com Exploring San Miguel Island
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Channel Islands National Park San Miguel Island Trail Guide timhaufphotography.com Exploring San Miguel Island Welcome to San Miguel Island, one of private boaters to contact the park to five islands in Channel Islands National ensure the island is open before coming Park. This is your island. It is also your ashore. responsibility. Please take a moment to read this bulletin and learn what you Many parts of San Miguel are closed can do to take care of San Miguel. This to protect wildlife, fragile plants, and information and the map on pages three geological features. Several areas, and four will show you what you can see however, are open for you to explore on and do here on San Miguel. your own. Others are open to you only when accompanied by a park ranger. About the Island San Miguel is the home of pristine On your own you may explore the tidepools, rare plants, and the strange Cuyler Harbor beach, Nidever Canyon, caliche forest. Four species of seals and Cabrillo monument, and the Lester ranch sea lions come here to breed and give site. Visitors are required to stay on the birth. For 10,000 years the island was designated island trail system. No off- home to the seagoing Chumash people. trail hiking is permitted. The island was Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo set foot here a bombing range and there are possible in 1542 as the first European to explore unexploded ordnance. In addition, the California coast. For 100 years the visitors must be accompanied by a ranger island was a sheep ranch and after that beyond the ranger station.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Combination in Acmispon (Fabaceae: Loteae) for California Luc Brouillet Université De Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 28 | Issue 1 Article 6 2010 A New Combination in Acmispon (Fabaceae: Loteae) for California Luc Brouillet Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Brouillet, Luc (2010) "A New Combination in Acmispon (Fabaceae: Loteae) for California," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 28: Iss. 1, Article 6. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol28/iss1/6 Aliso, 28, p. 63 ’ 2010, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden A NEW COMBINATION IN ACMISPON (FABACEAE: LOTEAE) FOR CALIFORNIA LUC BROUILLET Herbier Marie-Victorin, Institut de recherche en biologie ve´ge´tale, Universite´de Montre´al, 4101 Sherbrooke St. E, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H1X 2B2 ([email protected]) ABSTRACT The new combination Acmispon argophyllus (A.Gray) Brouillet var. niveus (Greene) Brouillet is made. Key words: Acmispon, California, Fabaceae, Loteae, North America, Santa Cruz Island. Acmispon argophyllus (A.Gray) Brouillet var. niveus (Greene) Variety niveus is a northern Channel Islands (California) Brouillet, comb. et stat. nov.—TYPE: California. Santa endemic that is distinguished from the closely related southern Cruz Island [s.d.], E.L. Greene s.n. (holotype CAS!, isotype Channel Islands endemic var. adsurgens (Dunkle) Brouillet by (part of type) UC!). stems ascending to erect (vs. erect), less crowded leaves, a silky (vs. silvery) indumentum, smaller umbels (6–10 vs. 10–13 Basionym: Syrmatium niveum Greene, Bull. Calif. Acad. Sci. 2: 148 flowers), and slightly longer calyx lobes (2.5–5.0 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds on San Clemente Island, As Part of Our Work Toward the Recovery of the Island’S Endangered Species
    WESTERN BIRDS Volume 36, Number 3, 2005 THE BIRDS OF SAN CLEMENTE ISLAND BRIAN L. SULLIVAN, PRBO Conservation Science, 4990 Shoreline Hwy., Stinson Beach, California 94970-9701 (current address: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, 159 Sapsucker Woods Rd., Ithaca, New York 14850) ERIC L. KERSHNER, Institute for Wildlife Studies, 2515 Camino del Rio South, Suite 334, San Diego, California 92108 With contributing authors JONATHAN J. DUNN, ROBB S. A. KALER, SUELLEN LYNN, NICOLE M. MUNKWITZ, and JONATHAN H. PLISSNER ABSTRACT: From 1992 to 2004, we observed birds on San Clemente Island, as part of our work toward the recovery of the island’s endangered species. We increased the island’s bird list to 317 species, by recording many additional vagrants and seabirds. The list includes 20 regular extant breeding species, 6 species extirpated as breeders, 5 nonnative introduced species, and 9 sporadic or newly colonizing breeding species. For decades San Clemente Island had been ravaged by overgrazing, especially by goats, which were removed completely in 1993. Since then, the island’s vegetation has begun recovering, and the island’s avifauna will likely change again as a result. We document here the status of that avifauna during this transitional period of re- growth, between the island’s being largely denuded of vegetation and a more natural state. It is still too early to evaluate the effects of the vegetation’s still partial recovery on birds, but the beginnings of recovery may have enabled the recent colonization of small numbers of Grasshopper Sparrows and Lazuli Buntings. Sponsored by the U. S. Navy, efforts to restore the island’s endangered species continue—among birds these are the Loggerhead Shrike and Sage Sparrow.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2009 an Analysis of Possible Risk To
    Project Title An Analysis of Possible Risk to Threatened and Endangered Plant Species Associated with Glyphosate Use in Alfalfa: A County-Level Analysis Authors Thomas Priester, Ph.D. Rick Kemman, M.S. Ashlea Rives Frank, M.Ent. Larry Turner, Ph.D. Bernalyn McGaughey David Howes, Ph.D. Jeffrey Giddings, Ph.D. Stephanie Dressel Data Requirements Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision E—Hazard Evaluation: Wildlife and Aquatic Organisms Guideline Number 70-1-SS: Special Studies—Effects on Endangered Species Date Completed August 22, 2007 Prepared by Compliance Services International 7501 Bridgeport Way West Lakewood, WA 98499-2423 (253) 473-9007 Sponsor Monsanto Company 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd. Saint Louis, MO 63167 Project Identification Compliance Services International Study 06711 Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 RD 1695 Volume 3 of 18 Page 1 of 258 Threatened & Endangered Plant Species Analysis CSI 06711 Glyphosate/Alfalfa Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 Page 2 of 258 STATEMENT OF NO DATA CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIMS The text below applies only to use of the data by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) in connection with the provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) No claim of confidentiality is made for any information contained in this study on the basis of its falling within the scope of FIFRA §10(d)(1)(A), (B), or (C). We submit this material to the United States Environmental Protection Agency specifically under the requirements set forth in FIFRA as amended, and consent to the use and disclosure of this material by EPA strictly in accordance with FIFRA. By submitting this material to EPA in accordance with the method and format requirements contained in PR Notice 86-5, we reserve and do not waive any rights involving this material that are or can be claimed by the company notwithstanding this submission to EPA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Ceanothus: Wild Lilacs and Their Kin
    THE GENUS CEANOTHUS: WILD LILACS AND THEIR KIN CEANOTHUS, A GENUS CENTERED IN CALIFORNIA AND A MEMBER OF THE BUCKTHORN FAMILY RHAMNACEAE The genus Ceanothus is exclusive to North America but the lyon’s share of species are found in western North America, particularly California • The genus stands apart from other members of the Rhamnaceae by • Colorful, fragrant flowers (blues, purples, pinks, and white) • Dry, three-chambered capsules • Sepals and petals both colored and shaped in a unique way, and • Three-sided receptacles that persist after the seed pods have dropped Ceanothus blossoms feature 5 hooded sepals, 5 spathula-shaped petals, 5 stamens, and a single pistil with a superior ovary Ceanothus seed pods are three sided and appear fleshy initially before drying out, turning brown, and splitting open Here are the three-sided receptacles left behind when the seed pods fall off The ceanothuses range from low, woody ground covers to treelike forms 20 feet tall • Most species are evergreen, but several deciduous kinds also occur • Several species feature thorny side branches • A few species have highly fragrant, resinous leaves • Habitats range from coastal bluffs through open woodlands & forests to chaparral and desert mountains The genus is subdivided into two separate subgenera that seldom exchange genes, even though species within each subgenus often hybridize • The true ceanothus subgenus (simply called Ceanothus) is characterized by • Alternate leaves with deciduous stipules • Leaves that often have 3 major veins (some have a single prominent midrib) • Flowers mostly in elongated clusters • Smooth seed pods without horns • The majority of garden species available belong to this group The leaves of C.
    [Show full text]