DOCSLIB.ORG

East Mormon Mountain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
East Mormon Mountain 1 11.5 EAST MORMON MOUNTAIN 2 3 4 11.5.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 11.5.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed East Mormon Mountain SEZ is located in Lincoln County in southern 10 Nevada (Figure 11.5.1.1-1). The SEZ has a total area of 8,968 acres (36 km2). In 2008, the 11 county population was 4,643, while adjacent Clark County to the south had a population of 12 1,879,093. The towns of Mesquite and Bunkerville are approximately 13 mi (21 km) southeast of 13 the SEZ; the larger, Mesquite, had a population of approximately 9,300 at the 2000 Census. The 14 Las Vegas metropolitan area is approximately 62 mi (100 km) to the southwest of the SEZ. 15 16 The nearest major road access to the proposed SEZ is I-15, which runs southwest– 17 northeast approximately 11 mi (18 km) to the southeast of the East Mormon Mountain SEZ. The 18 UP Railroad passes about 20 mi (32 km) west of the SEZ; the closest railroad stop is in Moapa, 19 approximately 25 mi (40 km) to the southwest. The nearest public airport is the Mesquite 20 Airport, a small airport in the vicinity of the SEZ near I-15. The nearest airport with scheduled 21 passenger service is the St. George Municipal Airport, 43 mi (69 km) to the northeast in 22 St. George, Utah. 23 24 A 500-kV transmission line is adjacent to the southeast corner of the SEZ; there are two 25 additional transmission lines within designated corridors adjacent to the site. It is assumed that 26 an existing transmission line could potentially provide access from the SEZ to the transmission 27 grid (see Section 11.5.1.2). 28 29 Applications for ROWs that have been submitted to the BLM include eight pending solar 30 projects, three pending authorizations for wind site testing, and two authorized projects for wind 31 site testing that would be located within 50 mi (80 km) of the East Mormon Mountain SEZ. 32 These applications are discussed in Section 11.5.22.2.1. There are currently no ROW 33 applications for solar projects within the SEZ. 34 35 The proposed East Mormon Mountain SEZ is located in the Lower Virgin River Valley. 36 The Mormon and East Mormon Mountains and Tule Spring Hills are located to the northwest of 37 the SEZ, and the Beaver Dam Mountains (in Utah and Arizona) are to the northeast. The Muddy 38 Mountains and Black Mountains are to the southwest; the Southern Virgin Mountains and Virgin 39 Mountains (Arizona) are to the southeast. 40 41 The proposed East Mormon Mountain SEZ and other relevant information are shown in 42 Figure 11.5.1.1-1. The criteria used to identify the SEZ as an appropriate location for solar 43 energy development included proximity to existing transmission lines or designated corridors, 44 proximity to existing roads, a slope of generally less than 2%, and an area of more than 45 2,500 acres (10 km2). In addition, the area was identified as being relatively free of other types 46 of conflicts, such as USFWS-designated critical habitat for threatened and endangered species, 47 ACECs, SRMAs, and NLCS lands (see Section 2.2.2.2 for the complete list of exclusions). Draft Solar PEIS 11.5-1 December 2010 1 2 FIGURE 11.5.1.1-1 Proposed East Mormon Mountain SEZ Draft Solar PEIS 11.5-2 December 2010 1 Although these classes of restricted lands were excluded from the proposed East Mormon 2 Mountain SEZ, other restrictions might be appropriate. The analyses in the following sections 3 evaluate the affected environment and potential impacts associated with utility-scale solar energy 4 development in the proposed SEZ for important environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic 5 resources. 6 7 As initially announced in the Federal Register on June 30, 2009, the proposed East 8 Mormon Mountain SEZ encompassed 7,418 acres (30 km2). Subsequent to the study area 9 scoping period, the boundaries of the proposed East Mormon Mountain SEZ were altered 10 somewhat to facilitate the BLM’s administration of the SEZ area. Some higher slope areas 11 internal to and at the borders of the site were added to the SEZ; particularly significant was the 12 addition of the Toquop Wash area to acreage. Although included in the SEZ, these higher slope 13 areas would not likely be utilized for solar facilities. Additionally, borders with irregularly 14 shaped boundaries were adjusted to match the section boundaries of the Public Lands Survey 15 System (PLSS) (BLM and USFS 2010c). The revised SEZ is approximately 1,550 acres 16 (6.3 km2) larger than the original SEZ area as published in June 2009. 17 18 19 11.5.1.2 Development Assumptions for the Impact Analysis 20 21 Maximum solar development of the East Mormon Mountain SEZ is assumed to be 80% 22 of the SEZ area over a period of 20 years, a maximum of 7,174 acres (29 km2). These values are 23 shown in Table 11.5.1.2-1, along with other development assumptions. Full development of the 24 East Mormon Mountain SEZ would allow development of facilities with an estimated total of 25 26 TABLE 11.5.1.2-1 Proposed East Mormon Mountain SEZ—Assumed Development Acreages, Solar MW Output, Access Roads, and Transmission Line ROWs Assumed Distance Area of Total Acreage Maximum Distance to and Capacity Assumed and Assumed SEZ Output Nearest State, of Nearest Transmission Distance to Developed for Various U.S., or Existing Line ROW Nearest Acreage Solar Interstate Transmission and Road Designated (80% of Total) Technologies Highway Line ROW Corridord 8,968 acres and 797 MWb and I-15 Adjacent, 0 acres and 0 mi 7,174 acresa 1,435 MWc 11 mid,e 500 kV 80 acres a To convert acres to km2, multiply by 0.004047. b Maximum power output if the SEZ were fully developed using power tower, dish engine, or PV technologies, assuming 9 acres/MW (0.04 km2/MW) of land required. c. Maximum power output if the SEZ were fully developed using solar trough technologies, assuming 5 acres/MW (0.02 km2/MW) of land required. d BLM-designated corridors are developed for federal land use planning purposes only and are not applicable to state-owned or privately owned land. e To convert mi to km, multiply by 1.609. Draft Solar PEIS 11.5-3 December 2010 1 797 MW of electrical power capacity if power tower, dish engine, or PV technologies were used, 2 assuming 9 acres/MW (0.04 km2/MW) of land required, and an estimated 1,435 MW of power if 3 solar trough technologies were used, assuming 5 acres/MW (0.02 km2/MW) of land required. 4 5 Availability of transmission from SEZs to load centers will be an important consideration 6 for future development in SEZs. The nearest existing transmission line is a 500-kV line that runs 7 adjacent to the SEZ. It is possible that this existing line could be used to provide access from the 8 SEZ to the transmission grid, but the 500-kV capacity of that line would likely be inadequate 9 for 797 to 1,435 MW of new capacity (a 500-kV line can accommodate approximately the load 10 of one 700-MW facility). At full build-out capacity, it is likely that new transmission and/or 11 upgrades of existing transmission lines would be required to bring electricity from the proposed 12 East Mormon Mountain SEZ to load centers; however, at this time the location and size of such 13 new transmission facilities are unknown. Generic impacts of transmission and associated 14 infrastructure construction and of line upgrades for various resources are discussed in Chapter 5. 15 Project-specific analyses would need to identify the specific impacts of new transmission 16 construction and line upgrades for any projects proposed within the SEZ. 17 18 For the purposes of analysis in the PEIS, it was assumed that the existing 500-kV 19 transmission line which runs adjacent to the proposed SEZ, could provide initial access to the 20 transmission grid, and thus no additional acreage for transmission line access was assessed. 21 Access to the existing transmission line was assumed, without additional information on whether 22 this line would be available for connection of future solar facilities. If a connecting transmission 23 line were constructed in the future to connect facilities within the SEZ to a different off-site grid 24 location from the one assumed here, site developers would need to determine the impacts from 25 construction and operation of that line. In addition, developers would need to determine the 26 impacts of line upgrades if they were needed. 27 28 I-15 lies 11 mi (18 km) to the south of the proposed East Mormon Mountain SEZ. 29 Assuming construction of a new access road to reach I-15 would be needed to support 30 construction and operation of solar facilities, approximately 80 acres (0.3 km2) of land 31 disturbance would occur (a 60-ft [18.3-m] wide ROW was assumed). 32 33 34 11.5.1.3 Summary of Major Impacts and SEZ-Specific Design Features 35 36 In this section, the impacts and SEZ-specific design features assessed in Sections 11.5.2 37 through 11.5.21 for the proposed East Mormon Mountain SEZ are summarized in tabular form. 38 Table 11.5.1.3-1 is a comprehensive list of impacts discussed in these sections; the reader may 39 reference the applicable sections for detailed support of the impact assessment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chuckwalla Habitat in Nevada
    Final Report 7 March 2003 Submitted to: Division of Wildlife, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, State of Nevada STATUS OF DISTRIBUTION, POPULATIONS, AND HABITAT RELATIONSHIPS OF THE COMMON CHUCKWALLA, Sauromalus obesus, IN NEVADA Principal Investigator, Edmund D. Brodie, Jr., Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5305 (435)797-2485 Co-Principal Investigator, Thomas C. Edwards, Jr., Utah Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit and Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5210 (435)797-2509 Research Associate, Paul C. Ustach, Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5305 (435)797-2450 1 INTRODUCTION As a primary consumer of vegetation in the desert, the common chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus (=ater; Hollingsworth, 1998), is capable of attaining high population density and biomass (Fitch et al., 1982). The 21 November 1991 Federal Register (Vol. 56, No. 225, pages 58804-58835) listed the status of chuckwalla populations in Nevada as a Category 2 candidate for protection. Large size, open habitat and tendency to perch in conspicuous places have rendered chuckwallas particularly vulnerable to commercial and non-commercial collecting (Fitch et al., 1982). Past field and laboratory studies of the common chuckwalla have revealed an animal with a life history shaped by the fluctuating but predictable desert climate (Johnson, 1965; Nagy, 1973; Berry, 1974; Case, 1976; Prieto and Ryan, 1978; Smits, 1985a; Abts, 1987; Tracy, 1999; and Kwiatkowski and Sullivan, 2002a, b). Life history traits such as annual reproductive frequency, adult survivorships, and population density have all varied, particular to the population of chuckwallas studied. Past studies are mostly from populations well within the interior of chuckwalla range in the Sonoran Desert.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conaway Ranch in Rainbow Canyon
    The Conaway Ranch in Rainbow Canyon Rainbow Canyon Rainbow Canyon is named for its spectacular rainbow colored rock walls. Meadow Valley Wash, a year-round spring fed stream, waters thousands of trees along its banks as it flows through the canyon. Ancient Man inhabited the canyon and artifacts recovered from caves carbon date their occupation to 5,000 years ago. In the 1860s, settlers established ranches in the canyon to supply beef, fruit and vegetables to the surrounding mining towns. The Conaway Ranch The history of the Property dates back to the 1860s when the Conaway Ranch was one of the first cattle ranches in the region. It was a favorite place of writer Zane Grey, who enjoyed staying at the ranch while he was writing about the wild west. Howard Hughes, Summa Corporation, owned the Conaway Ranch in the 1970s. He intended to develop a destination resort on the ranch. In the 1980s a developer drilled water wells, built a community sanitation system and leach field, and built a 9-hole golf course on the ranch. The golf course is grown over with natural cover, but pressure pumps and some underground infrastructure remain. A domestic well and the community leach field served several homes and golf club facilities during the years that the golf course operated, and currently serves two existing homes on the golf course. This information has been secured from sources we believe to be reliable, but we make no representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of the information. Buyer must verify the information and bears all risk for any inaccuracies.
    [Show full text]
  • ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona
    October 2015 BLM DOI-BLM-AZ-0000-2013-0001-EA ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona Final Environmental Assessment Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona DOI-BLM-AZ-0000-2013-0001-EA Bureau of Land Management Arizona State Office One North Central Avenue, Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4427 October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. iii Acronym List ................................................................................................................................... iv Section 1 – Proposed Action, Purpose and Need, and Background Information ........................... 1 1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Proposed Action Overview ............................................................................................... 3 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Statewide Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory and Projections, 1990-2020
    Nevada Statewide Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory and Projections, 1990-2020 Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Updated - December 2008 Nevada Statewide Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Projections,1990-2020 Updated - December 2008 DISCLAIMER The information contained in the Nevada Statewide Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Projections, 1990-2020 report is for public use; every effort has been made to ensure its accuracy. The information presented is as timely and accurate as practicable; no expressed or implied guarantees are made. Scenarios of potential future electrical generation that are presented in the section on Electrical Generation Sector Emissions are for informational purposes only and do not constitute any endorsement or implied preference. Information contained herein may be freely distributed and used for noncommercial, scientific, and educational purposes. Inquiries made in reference to this report should be directed to: Bureau of Air Quality Planning 901 South Stewart Street, Suite 4001 Carson City, Nevada 89701-5249 Telephone: (775) 687-4670 i Nevada Statewide Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Projections,1990-2020 Updated - December 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................i LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................iii LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium 2001: Resources, Production and Demand
    A Joint Report by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency Uranium 2001: Resources, Production and Demand NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: − to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; − to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and − to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14 December 2000). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention).
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources-Reconnaissance Series Report 54
    STATE OF NEVADA ·DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Carson City / Photograph by Lawrence Radiation Laboratory· Sedan Crater was formed in the dry a ll uv ium of Yucca Flat by on underground atomic detonation. WATER RESOURCES-RECONNAISSANCE SERIES REPORT 54 REGIONAL GROUND-WATER SYSTEMS IN THE NEVADA TEST SITE AREA, NYE, LINCOLN, AND CLARK COUNTIES, NEVADA By F. Eugene Rush Prepared cooperatively by the Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior 1970 WATER RESOURCES - RECONNAISSANCE: SEJUES REPORT 54 ·. REGIONAL GROUND-WATER SYSTEMS·IN THE NEVADA TEST SITE AREA, NYE, LINCOLN, AND CLARK COUN'riE:S, NEVADA By F. Eugene Rush PreparBd cooperatively by the Geological Survey, u.s. Department of the Interior 1971 -\ FOREWORD The progr~m of reconnaissance water-resources studies was authorized by the 1960 Legislature to be carried on by Division of Water Resources of the Departc.ment of· Conservation and Natural Resources in cooperation with the u.s. Geological Survey. This report is the 54th in the series to be prepared by the staff of the Nevada District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey. These 54 reports describe the hydrology of 185 valleys. The reconnaissance surveys make available pertinent information of great and immediate value to many State and Federal agencies, the State cooperating agency, and the public. As development takes place in any area, ,]c,,mands for more detailed information will arise, and studies to supply such information will be undertaken. In the meantime, these reconnaissance studies are timely and adequately In<'eet tlle immediate needs for information on the wate.r resources of the areas covered by the reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area and Addition, Lincoln and Clark Counties, Nevada by Daniel R. Shawe1 , H. Richard Blank, Jr. 1 , Brian P. Wernicke2 , Gary J. Axen3 , Harlan N. Barton1 , Gordon W. Day1 , and David C. Scott4 (Supplement to U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1729-B, Mineral resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada, by Shawe, D.R., Blank, H.R., Jr., Wernicke, B.P., Axen, G.J., Barton, H.N., Day, G.W., and Rains, R.L.) Open-File Report 90-0249 1990 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards nor with the North American stratigraphic code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1U.S. Geological Survey Department of Geology, Box 6030 Denver, CO 80225 Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ 86011 Department of Earth and Planetary Science 4U.S. Bureau of Mines Harvard University, Denver, CO 80225 Cambridge, MA 02138 STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-979, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine the mineral values, if any, that may be present. Results must be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report presents the results of a mineral survey of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area and Addition (NV-050-161), Lincoln and Clark Counties, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada
    Mineral Resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1729-B or ^JSSr Chapter B Mineral Resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada By DANIEL R. SHAWE, H. RICHARD BLANK, JR., BRIAN P. WERNICKE, GARY J. AXEN, HARLAN N. BARTON, and GORDON W. DAY U.S. Geological Survey RICHARD L RAINS U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1729 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS- SOUTHEASTERN NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Main entry under title: Mineral resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada. (Mineral resources of wilderness study areas southeastern Nevada ; ch. B) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1729-B) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1729-8. 1. Mines and mineral resources Nevada Mormon Mountains Wilderness. 2. Mormon Mountains Wilderness (Nev.). I. Shawe, Daniel R., 1925- . II. Series. III. Series: U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1729-B. QE75.B9 no. 1729-B 557.3s 87-600429 [TN24.N3] [553'.09793'14] STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine the mineral values, if any, that may be present.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioche Walking and Driving Tour
    Pioche $50,000 State Parks Dougherty’s Walking and Fishing of Lincoln Fine Jewelry Driving Tour Tournament County Opens Page 4 Page 7 Page 8 Page 15 Spring, 2010 PIOCHE THEN AND NOW By Jim Kelly Lincoln County and specifically, Pioche, COURT HOUSE” opens with how and why it has the dubious honor of having one of the cost so much. The two main reasons you least known, yet costliest, monuments to could’ve read in this morning’s newspaper are greed, graft, and corruption, the Wild West has CORRUPT POLITICIANS and GREEDY ever seen. BANKS. It was originally contracted to be I’m a newcomer to the quiet little town of built at cost of $26,400. But due to design Looking down on Pioche from Treasure Hill. Pioche; I’ve only lived here permanently for changes, over runs, and many pockets being about 10 years now. I was born in Las Vegas, lined, it came to $88,000. So they decided to and my father was born in Las Vegas. My sell bonds to raise the required monies, and, as paternal grandfather emigrated from Ireland to you can imagine, very little, if any, went Las Vegas in 1910 or 1911. Shortly after his toward repaying this debt. By the time the arrival he met, courted and married Martha bonds were at three times the original value in Lynch, who was born here in Pioche, as was 1907, the cost had soared to whopping her father John H. Lynch. Martha’s grandfa- $435,000. It took another 30 years to pay off ther was born in Ely, Nevada and came to the note, with the usual interest rates of over Pioche in the 1860’s during the great silver 25%.
    [Show full text]
  • Ar Iz Onautah California Cal If Orn Ia Oregon Idaho
    DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BASINS OF NEVADA £ * # £ 47N £ £ J OREGON IDAHO k a 11 e Jackpot r 18E 19E 10 24E 25E e b 20E 21E 5 McDermitt r 47N Denio £ 22E 26E 28E i 23E C 27E d E E Owyhee g e 2 2 68E 69E 70E / / 1 66E 67E 1 55E 6 1 47N 63E 64E 65E 4 46N 3 44E 46E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 57E 59E 60E 61E 62E 45E 47E 48E 5 2 54E 47N 56E 58E 30E 31E 32E 33E s 140 34E 35E 38E 41E B l 36E 37E 39E l 13 U 40E 42E 43E ru C V a K n a r e n F i R 46N n e a y g 39 o v u Mountain i n s i v 41 R 12 R e iv r Jarbidge Peak City e * 45N 2 *Capitol Peak 34 46N r 46N * Matterhorn C O re w ek 45N No y Copper Mtn. rth h n Fo e * o R rk e 33B 37 lm i L R a 44N v it 45N S 30A e t iv 4 140 r le e VU r 7 45N H u m Sun C 44N n bo 38 reek n ld 0 i t 40 u 68 9 Q Granite Peak 35 Wildhorse 44N 1 43N 33A * 8 3 29 Reservoir 9 44N 43N Vya U M a r 42N 43N ys Orovada* Santa Rosa Peak 30B 43N T 42N 27 *McAfee Peak 14 67 41N *Jacks Peak 42N A R S N 42N out h i F o v 41N e o r r r k t h 189B 189C L i 189A H t t l 40N Chimney e 41N 15 F 41N H Reservoir o u r r 25 e m k Tecoma v 42 40N i b 44 R o l d Humboldt t 36 R 40N i 39N 69 v r e 40N r e 93 v H U M B O L D T i £ 26 ¤ 189D 39N R t Montello ld 63 o b 39N 32 m R 38N 39N u E Li K O v 233 H e VU r 38N e 225 n l t VU in t u i Q ¤£95 L 31 38N 38N 66 Cobre 37N 16 37N Wells Ma 28 gg 80 ie ¨¦§ 37N Pilot Peak* A 37N Oasis 36N 36N C I r R e 93 e o ¤£ k c k 36N * Hole in the 36N Mtn.
    [Show full text]
  • DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL TRANSACTIONS VOLUME 8 A
    DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL TRANSACTIONS VOLUME 8 a Desert Bighorn Council A COMPILATION OF FORMAL PAPERS PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL AT THE EIGHTH ANNUAL MEETING, APRIL 7, 8, AND 9, 1964, IN MEXICO AT THE AUDITORIO DE SOCIAL SEGURIDO IN MEXICALI AND AT THE HOTEL VILLA DEL MAR AT PUERTO SAN FELIPE, BAJA CALIFORNIA. THE DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL TRANSACTIONS ARE PUBLISHED ANNUALLY AND ARE AVAILABLE BY WRITING THE . "DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL" P. 0. BOX 440, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA. COVER DRAWING. BY PAT HANSEN. EIGHTH ANNUAL MEETING DESERT BHGI3ORN COUNCIL April 7, 8, 9, 1964 Mexicali and Puerto San Felipe, Baia California TABLE OF CONTEWS Page .. - program ........................................................ 111 Group Picture ................................................... vii Opening Remarks Dr. Rodolfo Hernandez Corzo, Chairman ............................. xv John P. Russo, Vice-Chairman ................................... x.ix . pp-ppp- . ........................................- -- ... -- --- - .- FORMAL PAPERS AND DISCUSSIONS DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP AT THE SAN DIEGO ZOOLOGICAL GARDEN George H. Pournelle, Curator of hlammals ............................ 1 .~DIXTIOSALNOTES ON PARASITES OF BIGHORN SHEEP ON THE DESERT GAME RANGE, NEVADA Rex W. Allen .............................................. 5 1-OXG-DISTASCE AND NIGHTTLME MOVEMENTS OF DESERT BIGHORh' SHEEP Gale hlonson ............................................... 11 IIESERT BIGHORN MAVAGEMENT NEEDS FROM THE ACADEhllC . porn?; OF VIEW U'ilIiamGraf ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Hydrographic Areas and Sub-Areas/Listed Alphabetically by Primary County of Location Basin Area Area Area Num
    Appendix A-4--Nevada Hydrographic Areas and Sub-Areas/Listed Alphabetically by Primary County of Location Basin Area Area Area Num. Num. (sq.mi.) (acres) Desig Hydrograph Area/Sub-Area Counties [1] [2] [3] [4] Nearest Cities [6] Name Included [5] Carson City, 8 104 69 44,160 Eagle Valley Carson City Yes Douglas Frenchman, 10 125 43 27,520 Stingaree Valley Churchill Yes Eastgate 5 77 58 37,120 Fireball Valley Churchill Nixon, Fernley No Frenchman, 10 126 110 70,400 Cowkick Valley Churchill Yes Eastgate 10 133 416 266,240 Edwards Creek Valley Churchill Eastgate, Austin No 10 127 216 138,240 Eastgate Valley Area Churchill Eastgate Yes Bradys Hot Springs, 5 75 178 113,920 Brady Hot Springs Area Churchill, Lyon Yes Fernley Churchill, Frenchman, Fallon, 10 124 285 182,400 Fairview Valley Yes Mineral Eastgate Churchill, 10 123 227 145,280 Rawhide Flats Schurz, Fallon No Mineral, Lyon Churchill, 4 74 164 104,960 White Plains Lovelock, Fernley Yes Pershing Churchill, 10 128 1,303 833,920 Dixie Valley Dixie Valley, Fallon Yes Pershing, Lander Churchill, 8 101 2,022 1,294,080 Carson Desert Fallon, Stillwater Yes Pershing, Lyon North Las Vegas, 13 217 80 51,200 Hidden Valley Clark No Moapa Boulder City, 10 167 530 339,200 Eldorado Valley Clark Yes Searchlight Las Vegas, 13 212 1,564 1,000,960 Las Vegas Valley Clark Yes Henderson 13 223 533 341,120 Gold Butte Area Clark Overton, Logandale No 10 165 96 61,440 Jean Lake Valley Clark Jean, Goodsprings Yes Three Lakes Valley-Southern 13 211 311 199,040 Clark Indian Springs Yes Part Bunkerville, 13 224
    [Show full text]