DOCSLIB.ORG

Overton Power District No. 5 Power Transmission Expansion Project Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Overton Power District No. 5 Power Transmission Expansion Project Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2009-1020-EA Overton Power District No. 5 Power Transmission Expansion Project Environmental Assessment Clark County, Nevada March 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 North Torrey Pines Las Vegas, NV 89130 Phone: 702-515-5000 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action ............................................................... 8 1.3 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, Plans or Other Environmental Analyses ............ 8 1.3.1 Conformance With Land Use Plan ........................................................................... 8 1.3.2 Local Land Use Plans ..................................................................................................... 8 1.3.3 Authorizing Actions ................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Scoping, Public Involvement, and Issues ....................................................................... 8 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES .............................................................. 10 2.1 Alternative I – No Action Alternative ............................................................................. 10 2.2 Alternative II – Proposed Action ................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Design and Construction, 230-kV Structures ......................................................... 20 2.2.2 Design and Construction, 69-kV Structures ........................................................... 23 2.2.3 Design and Construction, 138-kV Structures ......................................................... 23 2.2.4 Substations ............................................................................................................. 23 2.2.6 Operation and Maintenance ................................................................................... 27 2.2.7 Reclamation, Stabilization, and Abandonment ....................................................... 27 2.2.8 Workforce ............................................................................................................... 27 2.2.9 Hazardous Materials .............................................................................................. 28 2.2.10 Applicant-committed Practices ............................................................................... 28 2.3 Alternatives Considered but not Analyzed in Detail ...................................................... 29 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................... 31 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 31 3.2 Climate and Air Quality ................................................................................................. 31 3.2.1 Climate ................................................................................................................... 31 3.2.2 Air Quality ............................................................................................................... 33 3.3 Areas of Critical Environmental Concern ...................................................................... 35 3.4 Wild and Scenic Rivers ................................................................................................. 37 3.5 Cultural Resources ....................................................................................................... 38 3.6 Paleontological Resources ........................................................................................... 40 3.7 Soils .............................................................................................................................. 40 3.8 Vegetation .................................................................................................................... 44 3.9 Invasive, Non-Native Species ....................................................................................... 46 3.10 Special Status Species ................................................................................................. 48 3.10.1 Special Status Wildlife and Fish Species ............................................................... 48 3.10.2 Special Status Plants ............................................................................................. 55 3.11 Wildlife and Fisheries ................................................................................................... 59 3.12 Wetlands and Riparian Zones ...................................................................................... 61 3.13 Floodplains ................................................................................................................... 64 3.13.1 Muddy River ........................................................................................................... 64 3.13.2 Virgin River ............................................................................................................. 64 Bureau of Land Management | DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2009-1020-EA Page i 3.14 Water Quality, Surface and Ground ............................................................................. 65 3.15 Wastes, Hazardous or Solid ......................................................................................... 70 3.16 Environmental Justice .................................................................................................. 71 3.17 Transportation and Access ........................................................................................... 71 3.18 Rangeland Management .............................................................................................. 72 3.19 Fuels and Fire Management ......................................................................................... 74 3.20 Noise ............................................................................................................................ 74 3.21 Health and Safety ......................................................................................................... 74 3.22 Recreation .................................................................................................................... 74 3.23 Visual Resources .......................................................................................................... 75 3.24 Geology ........................................................................................................................ 83 3.25 Socioeconomics ........................................................................................................... 84 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ..................................................................................... 86 4.1 Direct and Indirect Effects ............................................................................................ 87 4.1.1 Climate and Air Quality ........................................................................................... 87 4.1.2 Areas of Critical Environmental Concern ............................................................... 87 4.1.3 Wild and Scenic Rivers .......................................................................................... 87 4.1.4 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................. 88 4.1.5 Paleontology ........................................................................................................... 88 4.1.6 Soils ........................................................................................................................ 89 4.1.7 Vegetation .............................................................................................................. 89 4.1.8 Non-Native, Invasive Species and Noxious Weeds ............................................... 90 4.1.9 Special Status Species ........................................................................................... 90 4.1.9.1 Special Status Wildlife Species .............................................................................. 91 4.1.9.2 Special Status Plant Species ................................................................................. 95 4.1.10 Wildlife and Fisheries ............................................................................................. 97 4.1.11 Wetlands and Riparian Zones ................................................................................ 99 4.1.12 Floodplains ............................................................................................................. 99 4.1.13 Water Quality, Surface and Ground ....................................................................... 99 4.1.14 Wastes, Hazardous or Solid ................................................................................. 101 4.1.15 Environmental Justice .......................................................................................... 101 4.1.16 Transportation and Access ................................................................................... 101 4.1.17 Rangeland Management ...................................................................................... 102 4.1.18 Fuels and Fire Management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chuckwalla Habitat in Nevada
    Final Report 7 March 2003 Submitted to: Division of Wildlife, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, State of Nevada STATUS OF DISTRIBUTION, POPULATIONS, AND HABITAT RELATIONSHIPS OF THE COMMON CHUCKWALLA, Sauromalus obesus, IN NEVADA Principal Investigator, Edmund D. Brodie, Jr., Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5305 (435)797-2485 Co-Principal Investigator, Thomas C. Edwards, Jr., Utah Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit and Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5210 (435)797-2509 Research Associate, Paul C. Ustach, Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5305 (435)797-2450 1 INTRODUCTION As a primary consumer of vegetation in the desert, the common chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus (=ater; Hollingsworth, 1998), is capable of attaining high population density and biomass (Fitch et al., 1982). The 21 November 1991 Federal Register (Vol. 56, No. 225, pages 58804-58835) listed the status of chuckwalla populations in Nevada as a Category 2 candidate for protection. Large size, open habitat and tendency to perch in conspicuous places have rendered chuckwallas particularly vulnerable to commercial and non-commercial collecting (Fitch et al., 1982). Past field and laboratory studies of the common chuckwalla have revealed an animal with a life history shaped by the fluctuating but predictable desert climate (Johnson, 1965; Nagy, 1973; Berry, 1974; Case, 1976; Prieto and Ryan, 1978; Smits, 1985a; Abts, 1987; Tracy, 1999; and Kwiatkowski and Sullivan, 2002a, b). Life history traits such as annual reproductive frequency, adult survivorships, and population density have all varied, particular to the population of chuckwallas studied. Past studies are mostly from populations well within the interior of chuckwalla range in the Sonoran Desert.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth Report Data: January 2009 to December 2015
    Fifth Report Data: January 2009 to December 2015 ‘Our daughter Helen is a statistic in these pages. Understanding why, has saved others.’ David White Ngā mate aituā o tātou Ka tangihia e tātou i tēnei wā Haere, haere, haere. The dead, the afflicted, both yours and ours We lament for them at this time Farewell, farewell, farewell. Citation: Family Violence Death Review Committee. 2017. Fifth Report Data: January 2009 to December 2015. Wellington: Family Violence Death Review Committee. Published in June 2017 by the Health Quality & Safety Commission, PO Box 25496, Wellington 6146, New Zealand ISBN 978-0-908345-60-1 (Print) ISBN 978-0-908345-61-8 (Online) This document is available on the Health Quality & Safety Commission’s website: www.hqsc.govt.nz For information on this report, please contact [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Family Violence Death Review Committee is grateful to: • the Mortality Review Committee Secretariat based at the Health Quality & Safety Commission, particularly: – Rachel Smith, Specialist, Family Violence Death Review Committee – Joanna Minster, Senior Policy Analyst, Family Violence Death Review Committee – Kiri Rikihana, Acting Group Manager Mortality Review Committee Secretariat and Kaiwhakahaere Te Whai Oranga – Nikolai Minko, Principal Data Scientist, Health Quality Evaluation • Pauline Gulliver, Research Fellow, School of Population Health, University of Auckland • Dr John Little, Consultant Psychiatrist, Capital & Coast District Health Board • the advisors to the Family Violence Death Review Committee. The Family Violence Death Review Committee also thanks the people who have reviewed and provided feedback on drafts of this report. FAMILY VIOLENCE DEATH REVIEW COMMITTEE FIFTH REPORT DATA: JANUARY 2009 TO DECEMBER 2015 1 FOREWORD The Health Quality & Safety Commission (the Commission) welcomes the Fifth Report Data: January 2009 to December 2015 from the Family Violence Death Review Committee (the Committee).
    [Show full text]
  • The Baltavar Hippotherium: a Mixed Feeding Upper Miocene Hipparion (Equidae, Perissodactyla) from Hungary (East- Central Europe)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Beiträge zur Paläontologie Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: 30 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kaiser Thomas M., Bernor Raymond L. Artikel/Article: The Baltavar Hippotherium: A mixed feeding Upper Miocene hipparion (Equidae, Perissodactyla) from Hungary (East-Central Europe) 241-267 ©Verein zur Förderung der Paläontologie am Institut für Paläontologie, Geozentrum Wien Beitr. Paläont., 30:241-267, Wien 2006 The Baltavar Hippotherium: A mixed feeding Upper Miocene hipparion (Equidae, Perissodactyla) from Hungary (East- Central Europe) by Thomas M. Kaiser 1} & Raymond L. Bernor * 2) Kaiser , Th.M. & B ernor , R.L., 2006. The Baltavar Hippotherium. A mixed feeding Upper Miocene hipparion (Equidae, Perissodactyla) from Hungary (East-Central Europe). — Beitr. Palaont., 30:241-267, Wien. Abstract browse ratio of 50/50% in its diet. The impala lives in tropi­ cal east Africa in grass dominated open environments like The genus Hippotherium evolved in Central and Western bushland and Acacia savannahs but also in Acacia forests Europe following the “Hipparion Datum” and is particu­ and other deciduous woodlands. It further has one of the larly remarkable for its complexly ornamented enamel pli­ most abrasive diets among extant mixed feeders and is con­ cations on the maxillary and mandibular cheek teeth. The sistently classified next to the grazers in mesowear evalu­ Baltavar hipparion assemblage is of importance because it ation. The comparatively abrasive diet of H. “microdon” represents one of the latest known populations of Central suggests the presence of grass or other abrasive vegetation European Hippotherium. The Baltavar fauna accumulated in the Baltavar paleohabitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids Pablo Librado, Ludovic Orlando
    Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids Pablo Librado, Ludovic Orlando To cite this version: Pablo Librado, Ludovic Orlando. Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, Annual Reviews, 2021, 9 (1), 10.1146/annurev-animal-061220-023118. hal- 03030307 HAL Id: hal-03030307 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03030307 Submitted on 30 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2021. 9:X–X https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-061220-023118 Copyright © 2021 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved Librado Orlando www.annualreviews.org Equid Genomics and Evolution Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids Pablo Librado and Ludovic Orlando Laboratoire d’Anthropobiologie Moléculaire et d’Imagerie de Synthèse, CNRS UMR 5288, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse 31000, France; email: [email protected] Keywords equid, horse, evolution, donkey, ancient DNA, population genomics Abstract The equid family contains only one single extant genus, Equus, including seven living species grouped into horses on the one hand and zebras and asses on the other. In contrast, the equine fossil record shows that an extraordinarily richer diversity existed in the past and provides multiple examples of a highly dynamic evolution punctuated by several waves of explosive radiations and extinctions, cross-continental migrations, and local adaptations.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Health Biomed Central
    Environmental Health BioMed Central Review Open Access Ancillary human health benefits of improved air quality resulting from climate change mitigation Michelle L Bell*1, Devra L Davis2, Luis A Cifuentes3, Alan J Krupnick4, Richard D Morgenstern4 and George D Thurston5 Address: 1School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA, 2Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, CNPAV 435, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA, 3Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, P. Catholic University of Chile, Engineering School, Santiago, Chile, 4Resources for the Future, Washington, DC 20036, USA and 5School of Medicine, New York University, Tuxedo, NY 10987, USA Email: Michelle L Bell* - [email protected]; Devra L Davis - [email protected]; Luis A Cifuentes - [email protected]; Alan J Krupnick - [email protected]; Richard D Morgenstern - [email protected]; George D Thurston - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 31 July 2008 Received: 4 April 2008 Accepted: 31 July 2008 Environmental Health 2008, 7:41 doi:10.1186/1476-069X-7-41 This article is available from: http://www.ehjournal.net/content/7/1/41 © 2008 Bell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation policies can provide ancillary benefits in terms of short-term improvements in air quality and associated health benefits. Several studies have analyzed the ancillary impacts of GHG policies for a variety of locations, pollutants, and policies.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV0S010-2009-1014-EA May 2016 Eastern Nevada Transmission Project APPLICANT Silver State Energy Association GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086357 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Background ........................................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action .........................................................................................2 1.4 Decisions to be Made .....................................................................................................7 1.5 BLM Policies, Plans, Authorizing Actions, and Permit Requirements .........................7 Chapter 2 - Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Regulatory Framework for Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area and Addition, Lincoln and Clark Counties, Nevada by Daniel R. Shawe1 , H. Richard Blank, Jr. 1 , Brian P. Wernicke2 , Gary J. Axen3 , Harlan N. Barton1 , Gordon W. Day1 , and David C. Scott4 (Supplement to U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1729-B, Mineral resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada, by Shawe, D.R., Blank, H.R., Jr., Wernicke, B.P., Axen, G.J., Barton, H.N., Day, G.W., and Rains, R.L.) Open-File Report 90-0249 1990 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards nor with the North American stratigraphic code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1U.S. Geological Survey Department of Geology, Box 6030 Denver, CO 80225 Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ 86011 Department of Earth and Planetary Science 4U.S. Bureau of Mines Harvard University, Denver, CO 80225 Cambridge, MA 02138 STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-979, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine the mineral values, if any, that may be present. Results must be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report presents the results of a mineral survey of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area and Addition (NV-050-161), Lincoln and Clark Counties, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Tulane Studies Tn Geology and Paleontology Pliocene
    TULANE STUDIES TN GEOLOGY AND PALEONTOLOGY Volu me 22, Number 2 Sepl<'mber 20. l!J8~) PLIOCENE THREE-TOED HORSES FROM LOUISIANA. WITH COMMENTS ON THE CITRONELLE FORMATION EAHL M. MANNING MUSP.UM OF'GEOSCIF:NCE. LOUISJJ\NA STATE UNIVF:RSlTY. JJATO.\I ROI.JG/<. LOL'/S//\;\':1 and llRUCE J. MACFADDlrn DEJ>ARTM/<:NTOF NATUH/\LSCIENCES. F'LORJD/\ MUSf:UM Of<'NJ\TUIV\/, lllSTOUY UNIVERSITY OF FLOH!IJJ\. GJ\/NESVlU.E. Fl.OH/DA CONTENTS Page T. ABSTRACT 3.5 II INTRODUCTION :l5 Ill. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS :rn TV . ABBREVIATIONS :l7 V. SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY ;37 VI. AGE OF THE TUNICA HILLS HIPPARIONINES 38 VIL STRATIGRAPHIC PROVENIENCE 38 Vlll. PLIOCENE TERRESTRIAL VERTEBRATES OF THE GULF AND ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN .JO IX. COMMENTS ON THE CITRONELLE FORMATION .JI X. AGE OF THE CITRONELLE 42 XL TH E CITRONELLE FORMATION IN nm TUNICA HILLS .t:1 XII. LITERATURE CITED l.J January of 1985, the senior author was L ABSTRACT shown a large collection of late Pleistocene Teeth and metacarpals of early Pliocene (Rancholabrean land-mammal agel ver­ (latest Hemphillian land-mammal age) tebrate fossils from the Tunica Hills of three-toed (hipparionine) horses are de­ Louisiana (Fig. I) by Dr. A. Bradley scribed from the Tunica Hills of West McPherson of Centenary College, Feliciana Parish in east-central Louisiana. Shreveport. McPherson and Mr. Bill Lee An upper molar perta ins to Nannippus of Balon Rouge had collected fossils from minor, known from the Hcmphillian of that area since about 1981. Among the Central and North America, and two teeth standard assemblage of Rancholabrean and two distal metacarpals pertain to a re­ taxa (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada
    Mineral Resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1729-B or ^JSSr Chapter B Mineral Resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada By DANIEL R. SHAWE, H. RICHARD BLANK, JR., BRIAN P. WERNICKE, GARY J. AXEN, HARLAN N. BARTON, and GORDON W. DAY U.S. Geological Survey RICHARD L RAINS U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1729 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS- SOUTHEASTERN NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Main entry under title: Mineral resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada. (Mineral resources of wilderness study areas southeastern Nevada ; ch. B) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1729-B) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1729-8. 1. Mines and mineral resources Nevada Mormon Mountains Wilderness. 2. Mormon Mountains Wilderness (Nev.). I. Shawe, Daniel R., 1925- . II. Series. III. Series: U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1729-B. QE75.B9 no. 1729-B 557.3s 87-600429 [TN24.N3] [553'.09793'14] STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine the mineral values, if any, that may be present.
    [Show full text]
  • LATE MIOCENE FISHES of the CACHE VALLEY MEMBER, SALT LAKE FORMATION, UTAH and IDAHO By
    LATE MIOCENE FISHES OF THE CACHE VALLEY MEMBER, SALT LAKE FORMATION, UTAH AND IDAHO by PATRICK H. MCCLELLAN AND GERALD R. SMITH MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, 208 Ann Arbor, December 17, 2020 ISSN 0076-8405 P U B L I C A T I O N S O F T H E MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 208 GERALD SMITH, Editor The publications of the Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, consist primarily of two series—the Miscellaneous Publications and the Occasional Papers. Both series were founded by Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradshaw H. Swales, and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. Occasionally the Museum publishes contributions outside of these series. Beginning in 1990 these are titled Special Publications and Circulars and each is sequentially numbered. All submitted manuscripts to any of the Museum’s publications receive external peer review. The Occasional Papers, begun in 1913, serve as a medium for original studies based principally upon the collections in the Museum. They are issued separately. When a sufficient number of pages has been printed to make a volume, a title page, table of contents, and an index are supplied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the series. The Miscellaneous Publications, initiated in 1916, include monographic studies, papers on field and museum techniques, and other contributions not within the scope of the Occasional Papers, and are published separately. Each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents. A complete list of publications on Mammals, Birds, Reptiles and Amphibians, Fishes, I nsects, Mollusks, and other topics is available.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Validity of Equus Laurentius Hay, 1913 Eric Scott, Division of Geological Sciences, San Bernardino County Museum, Redlands, California Thomas W
    On the Validity of Equus laurentius Hay, 1913 Eric Scott, Division of Geological Sciences, San Bernardino County Museum, Redlands, California Thomas W. Stafford, Jr., Stafford Research Laboratories, Boulder, Colorado Russell W. Graham, Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Denver Museum of Nature and Sciences, Denver, Colorado Larry D. Martin, Division of Vertebrate Paleontology, Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas ABSTRACT BACKGROUND The species Equus laurentius Hay, 1913 has been controversial since its The species Equus laurentius was named from an associated skull and mandible recovered from a sandbar on the north side of the Kansas River near Lawrence in Douglas County, inception. Authorities have differed over the interpretation of this taxon; Kansas (Hay, 1913). The specimen (KUVP 347) was presumed to be of Pleistocene age, as it was found in apparent association with a femur assigned to Smilodon from the same some have considered it a legitimate Pleistocene horse species, while sandbar and appeared mineralized. E. laurentius was considered by Hay (1913) to be a horse similar in size to smaller domestic breeds, with rather small cheek teeth that exhibited others have proposed that the name is invalid on the basis that the relatively simple enamel infoldings or plications. Measurements provided by Hay (1913) for KUVP 347 did not distinguish the specimen from extant E. caballus (Hay, 1927). holotype specimen is a mineralized skull of a recent horse. As the taxon is still frequently employed in studies of Pleistocene equids, it is important Several subsequent authors (Matthew, 1926; Savage, 1951; Winans, 1985, 1989) considered the holotype of Equus laurentius to be a skull of a modern horse, Equus caballus to correctly assess its validity.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Influence of Weather in 5 U.S. Cities During Wintertime High Mortality Days
    ASSESSING THE INFLUENCE OF WEATHER IN 5 U.S. CITIES DURING WINTERTIME HIGH MORTALITY DAYS A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Michael James Allen December, 2010 Thesis written by Michael James Allen B.S., California University of Pennsylvania, 2008 M.A., Kent State University, 2010 Approved by ______________________, Dr. Scott Sheridan, Advisor ______________________, Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk, Chair, Department of Geography ______________________, Dr. Timothy Moerland, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................ vii LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................... ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................. xii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND...................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Weather Mortality..................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Biological Causes................................................................................ 5 2.1.2 Socio-Economic, Demographic, and Behavioral Factors.................... 7 2.1.3 The Lag Effect and Mortality
    [Show full text]