DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Lee Elliott 14 January 2014 the Following Descriptions Cover The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Lee Elliott 14 January 2014 the Following Descriptions Cover The DESCRIPTIONS OF SYSTEMS, MAPPING SUBSYSTEMS, AND VEGETATION TYPES FOR TEXAS Lee Elliott 14 January 2014 The following descriptions cover the systems that have been identified for the legend for all the phases of the Ecological Systems Classification and Mapping Project in support of the Texas Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Many of these descriptions were drafted from System descriptions available from NatureServe (http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/). Most System descriptions were modified, and all Vegetation Type descriptions were generated from discussions regarding these cover types. These brief narratives generally focus on ‘typical’ type concepts, and mapped vegetation types often circumscribe more variation on the ground than what is described here. For each system, a number of cover types, or “Vegetation Types” were described. A common name is given for each Vegetation Type, and this name is used in the table of contents and for the map legend. Additionally, a second name is provided which more directly ties the Vegetation Type to the system of which it is a part. A numeric identifier is also provided. This identifier represents the identifier used by NatureServe for the system. For the Vegetation Type, a digit suffix is provided to distinguish the various cover types within the system. In parentheses directly following the common name of the Vegetation Type, a number is provided. This number represents the numeric code used to track the Vegetation Types during the mapping process. TABLE OF CONTENTS Forests, Woodlands and Savannas .......................................................................................................... 16 Bastrop Lost Pines Forest and Woodland ............................................................................................... 16 Bastrop Lost Pines: Loblolly Pine Forest (101) .................................................................................. 16 Bastrop Lost Pines: Loblolly Pine - Oak Forest (103) ........................................................................ 17 Bastrop Lost Pines: Loblolly Pine Slope Forest (121) ............................................................................ 17 Bastrop Lost Pines: Loblolly Pine - Oak Slope Forest (123) .............................................................. 17 Bastrop Lost Pines: Hardwood Slope Forest (124) ............................................................................. 18 Central and South Texas Coastal Fringe Forest and Woodland ............................................................. 18 Coastal and Sandsheet: Deep Sand Live Oak Forest and Woodland (6402) ...................................... 20 Coastal and Sandsheet: Deep Sand Live Oak - Mesquite Woodland (6403) ...................................... 20 Coastal and Sandsheet: Deep Sand Live Oak Shrubland (6405) ........................................................ 20 Coastal and Sandsheet: Deep Sand Live Oak Swale Marsh (6407) .................................................... 20 Crosstimbers Oak Forest and Woodland ................................................................................................ 21 Crosstimbers: Live Oak Forest and Woodland (502) ......................................................................... 22 Crosstimbers: Post Oak - Juniper Woodland (503) ............................................................................. 22 Crosstimbers: Post Oak Woodland (504) ............................................................................................ 22 1 Crosstimbers: Savanna Grassland (507) ............................................................................................. 23 Crosstimbers: Juniper Slope Forest (521) ........................................................................................... 23 Crosstimbers: Hardwood - Juniper Slope Forest (523) ....................................................................... 23 Crosstimbers: Oak - Hardwood Slope Forest (524) ............................................................................ 24 Crosstimbers: Sandyland Oak Woodland (534) .................................................................................. 24 East-Central Texas Plains Post Oak Savanna and Woodland ................................................................. 25 Post Oak Savanna: Live Oak Motte and Woodland (602) .................................................................. 26 Post Oak Savanna: Post Oak - Redcedar Motte and Woodland (603) ................................................ 27 Post Oak Savanna: Post Oak - Live Oak Motte and Woodland (633) ................................................ 27 Post Oak Savanna: Post Oak Motte and Woodland (604) .................................................................. 27 Post Oak Savanna: Post Oak - Yaupon Motte and Woodland (613) .................................................. 28 Post Oak Savanna: Savanna Grassland (607) ..................................................................................... 28 Post Oak Savanna: Live Oak Shrubland (605) ................................................................................... 29 Post Oak Savanna: Redcedar Slope Forest (621) ................................................................................ 29 Post Oak Savanna: Oak - Redcedar Slope Forest (623) ...................................................................... 29 Post Oak Savanna: Live Oak Slope Forest (622) ................................................................................ 29 Post Oak Savanna: Post Oak - Live Oak Slope Forest (643) .............................................................. 29 Post Oak Savanna: Oak - Hardwood Slope Forest (624) .................................................................... 30 Edwards Plateau Dry-Mesic Slope Forest and Woodland ...................................................................... 30 Edwards Plateau: Ashe Juniper Slope Forest (901) ............................................................................ 31 Edwards Plateau: Live Oak Slope Forest (902) .................................................................................. 31 Edwards Plateau: Oak - Ashe Juniper Slope Forest (903) .................................................................. 31 Edwards Plateau: Oak - Hardwood Slope Forest (904) ...................................................................... 32 Edwards Plateau Limestone Savanna and Woodland ............................................................................. 33 Edwards Plateau: Ashe Juniper Motte and Woodland (1101) ............................................................ 34 Edwards Plateau: Live Oak Motte and Woodland (1102) .................................................................. 34 Edwards Plateau: Deciduous Oak - Evergreen Motte and Woodland (1103) ..................................... 35 Edwards Plateau: Oak - Hardwood Motte and Woodland (1104) ...................................................... 35 Edwards Plateau: Post Oak Motte and Woodland (1114) ................................................................... 35 Edwards Plateau: Savanna Grassland (1107) ...................................................................................... 36 Edwards Plateau Mesic Canyon (not mapped) ....................................................................................... 37 Edwards Plateau Bigtooth Maple Mesic Canyon (not mapped) ........................................................ 37 Edwards Plateau Mixed Deciduous Mesic Canyon (not mapped) ...................................................... 38 Llano Uplift Acidic Forest, Woodland, and Glade ................................................................................. 38 Llano Uplift: Live Oak Woodland (1602) .......................................................................................... 39 Llano Uplift: Post Oak Woodland (1604) ........................................................................................... 39 2 Llano Uplift Acidic Glade (not mapped) ............................................................................................ 39 Llano Uplift: Mesquite / Whitebrush Shrubland (1606) ..................................................................... 40 Llano Uplift: Grassland (1607) ........................................................................................................... 40 Madrean Encinal ..................................................................................................................................... 40 Trans-Pecos: Gray Oak Savanna and Woodland (10702) ................................................................... 41 Trans-Pecos: Mixed Oak Savanna and Woodland (10703) ................................................................ 41 Madrean Juniper Savanna ....................................................................................................................... 41 Trans-Pecos: Juniper Savanna and Woodland (10805) ...................................................................... 42 Madrean Lower Montane Pine - Oak Forest and Woodland .................................................................. 42 Trans-Pecos: Ponderosa/Arizona Pine Woodland (10901) ................................................................. 43 Trans-Pecos: Ponderosa/Arizona Pine - Oak Woodland (10903) ....................................................... 43 Trans-Pecos: Mountain
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hazard Mitigation Plan Draft
    MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Five Year Update RED RIVER COUNTY TEXAS INCORPORATED AND UNINCORPORATED AREAS 1 Table of Contents SUBJECT PAGE/S Cover Table Of Contents SECTION I Purpose Plan Organizational Structure The Planning Process Map: Red River County State Location Map: Red River County County Government Economic Considerations Resource Information Table: Important Dates Table: Red River County Team Members Background and Contributions Table: Identified Stakeholders Public Participation SECTION II Hazard Identification and Assessment Table: Areas of Risk: Hazards Identified Table: Natural Hazards Most Likely to Occur in red River County Table: Hazards Listed in the Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan Not Included in the Red River Plan Table: Potential Severity of Impacts Table: Probability of Future Events Table: Warning Time Table: Duration Table: Priority Risk Index Table: Hazard Vulnerability Table: Red River County Damage Assessment Hazard Analysis Flood Map: Clarksville Floodplains Map: Avery Floodplains Map: Avery Floodplains Map: Annona Floodplains Map: Bogata Floodplains Map: Detroit Floodplains History of Flooding in Red River County Table: National Flood Insurance Program Participation Table: Red River County Flood Risk Table: Extent Table: Estimated Property Loss Location, Extent, Impact, Probability, Vulnerability, Summary 2 Tornadoes Description Map: Wind Zones in the United States Table: Enhanced Fujita Scale Table: Red River County Tornadoes Table: Probability/Severity Table: Red River County Tornado Risk Table: Estimated Property
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrated Flora of East Texas Illustrated Flora of East Texas
    ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS IS PUBLISHED WITH THE SUPPORT OF: MAJOR BENEFACTORS: DAVID GIBSON AND WILL CRENSHAW DISCOVERY FUND U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION (NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, USDA FOREST SERVICE) TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT SCOTT AND STUART GENTLING BENEFACTORS: NEW DOROTHEA L. LEONHARDT FOUNDATION (ANDREA C. HARKINS) TEMPLE-INLAND FOUNDATION SUMMERLEE FOUNDATION AMON G. CARTER FOUNDATION ROBERT J. O’KENNON PEG & BEN KEITH DORA & GORDON SYLVESTER DAVID & SUE NIVENS NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY OF TEXAS DAVID & MARGARET BAMBERGER GORDON MAY & KAREN WILLIAMSON JACOB & TERESE HERSHEY FOUNDATION INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT: AUSTIN COLLEGE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS SID RICHARDSON CAREER DEVELOPMENT FUND OF AUSTIN COLLEGE II OTHER CONTRIBUTORS: ALLDREDGE, LINDA & JACK HOLLEMAN, W.B. PETRUS, ELAINE J. BATTERBAE, SUSAN ROBERTS HOLT, JEAN & DUNCAN PRITCHETT, MARY H. BECK, NELL HUBER, MARY MAUD PRICE, DIANE BECKELMAN, SARA HUDSON, JIM & YONIE PRUESS, WARREN W. BENDER, LYNNE HULTMARK, GORDON & SARAH ROACH, ELIZABETH M. & ALLEN BIBB, NATHAN & BETTIE HUSTON, MELIA ROEBUCK, RICK & VICKI BOSWORTH, TONY JACOBS, BONNIE & LOUIS ROGNLIE, GLORIA & ERIC BOTTONE, LAURA BURKS JAMES, ROI & DEANNA ROUSH, LUCY BROWN, LARRY E. JEFFORDS, RUSSELL M. ROWE, BRIAN BRUSER, III, MR. & MRS. HENRY JOHN, SUE & PHIL ROZELL, JIMMY BURT, HELEN W. JONES, MARY LOU SANDLIN, MIKE CAMPBELL, KATHERINE & CHARLES KAHLE, GAIL SANDLIN, MR. & MRS. WILLIAM CARR, WILLIAM R. KARGES, JOANN SATTERWHITE, BEN CLARY, KAREN KEITH, ELIZABETH & ERIC SCHOENFELD, CARL COCHRAN, JOYCE LANEY, ELEANOR W. SCHULTZE, BETTY DAHLBERG, WALTER G. LAUGHLIN, DR. JAMES E. SCHULZE, PETER & HELEN DALLAS CHAPTER-NPSOT LECHE, BEVERLY SENNHAUSER, KELLY S. DAMEWOOD, LOGAN & ELEANOR LEWIS, PATRICIA SERLING, STEVEN DAMUTH, STEVEN LIGGIO, JOE SHANNON, LEILA HOUSEMAN DAVIS, ELLEN D.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Opinion Regarding the Issuance of an Endangered Species Act of 1973, As Amended, (Act) Section 10(A)(1)(B) Permit
    Biological Opinion for TE-065406-0 This document transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) biological opinion regarding the issuance of an Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, (Act) Section 10(a)(1)(B) permit. The federal action under consideration is the issuance of a permit authorizing the incidental take of the federally listed endangered Houston toad (Bufo houstonensis) under the authority of sections 10(a)(1)(B) and 10(a)(2) of the Act. Boy Scouts of America, Capitol Area Council No. 564 (BSA/CAC) has submitted an application for an incidental take permit under the Act for take of the Houston toad. An Environmental Assessment/Habitat Conservation Plan (EA/HCP) has been reviewed for mitigation acceptability. The implementing regulations for Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act, as provided for by 50 CFR 17.22, specify the criteria by which a permit allowing the incidental "take" of listed endangered species pursuant to otherwise lawful activities may be obtained. The purpose and need for the Section 10(a)(1)(B) permit is to ensure that incidental take resulting from the proposed construction and operation of a “High Adventure” camp on the 4,848-acre Griffith League Ranch in Bastrop County, Texas, will be minimized and mitigated to the maximum extent practicable, and that the take is not expected to appreciably reduce the likelihood of the survival and recovery of this federally listed endangered species in the wild or adversely modify or destroy its federally designated critical habitat. The two federally listed species identified within this EA/HCP include the endangered Houston toad (and its designated critical habitat) and the threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus).
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Resistance and Resilience of Military Lands Using Vegetation Indices
    12 - 17 - ERDC/CERL TR ERDC/CERL Integrated Climate Assessment for Army Enterprise Planning Estimating Resistance and Resilience of Military Lands Using Vegetation Indices Ryan R. Busby, Dick L. Gebhart, Steven J. Oxley, May 2017 William D. Tarantino, and Wade A. Wall Engineering Construction Construction Laboratory Research Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) solves the nation’s toughest engineering and environmental challenges. ERDC develops innovative solutions in civil and military engineering, geospatial sciences, water resources, and environmental sciences for the Army, the Department of Defense, civilian agencies, and our nation’s public good. Find out more at www.erdc.usace.army.mil. To search for other technical reports published by ERDC, visit the ERDC online library at http://acwc.sdp.sirsi.net/client/default. Integrated Climate Assessment for Army ERDC/CERL TR-17-12 Enterprise Planning May 2017 Estimating Resistance and Resilience of Military Lands Using Vegetation Indices Ryan R. Busby, Dick L. Gebhart, Steven J. Oxley, William D. Tarantino, and Wade A. Wall Construction Engineering Research Laboratory U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center 2902 Newmark Drive Champaign, IL 61822 Final Report Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Prepared for Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC 20314-1000 Under Program 622720896, Project 402188, “Integrated Climate Assessment for Army Enterprise Planning” ERDC/CERL TR-17-12 ii Abstract Military training inevitably leads to land degradation; however, some eco- systems have higher resistance and resilience to training based on the functional traits of existing vegetation, making them preferred for long- term use.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of the Fine Scale Outcomes from Prescribed Fire Relevant to the Endangered Houston Toad (Bufo Houstonensis) Within the Lost Pines Ecosystem of Texas
    FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT As Required by THE ENDANGERED SPECIES PROGRAM TEXAS Grant No. TX E-114-R-1 Endangered and Threatened Species Conservation Detection of fine scale outcomes from prescribed fire relevant to the endangered Houston toad (Bufo houstonensis) within the Lost Pines ecoregion of Texas Prepared by: Mike Forstner Carter Smith Executive Director Clayton Wolf Director, Wildlife 8 November 2012 INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT STATE: ____Texas_______________ GRANT NUMBER: ___ TX E-114-R-1_ GRANT TITLE: Detection of fine scale outcomes from prescribed fire relevant to the endangered Houston toad (Bufo houstonensis) within the Lost Pines ecoregion of Texas REPORTING PERIOD: ____1 Sep 09 to 28 Feb 13_ OBJECTIVE(S): To determine the fine scale effects of prescribed fire on Houston toad habitat selection and reproductive success over three years based on integrated study of terrestrial and aquatic systems. Segment Objectives: Task 1. Aug 2009-Aug 2011 (monthly). Hydroperiod monitoring. Task 2. Mar-Apr (annually). Daily amphibian trapping using Y-shaped arrays. Task 3. Mar-Apr (annually). Amphibian call surveys and Houston toad breeding activity and success monitoring. Task 4. Aug-Sept (annually). Terrestrial habitat sampling. Task 5. Sep-Nov (annually). Aquatic habitat sampling. Task 6. Nov-Jan (annually under design see Figure 1). Prescribed burn. Task 7. Nov-Jan (annually). Immediate post-burn aquatic habitat sampling. Task 8. Nov-Jan (annually). Immediate post-burn terrestrial habitat sampling. Task 9. July-Aug (annually). Analysis of outcomes, particularly short term results and effects. Significant Deviations: None. Summary Of Progress: See pdf file, attached. Location: Bastrop County, Texas. Cost: ___Costs were not available at time of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Geocarpon Between March 1 and Geocarpon June 1
    be surveyed for geocarpon between March 1 and Geocarpon June 1. Geocarpon minimum Managing geocarpon requires restoring the native glade natural community. Promote land Guidelines for Landowners management activities that reduce woody vegetation and reduce competition from invasive Using Conservation Practices plants. Areas adjacent to existing geocarpon sites should be managed in such a way as to prevent the Missouri Department of introduction of non-native species or possible Conservation degradation of the native plant community. Common name ▪ Geocarpon A survey of the project area should be conducted by Scientific name ▪ Geocarpon minimum a trained biologist between March and June in order State status ▪ Endangered to identify occurring populations of this species. Federal status ▪ Threatened Limit construction activities to deeper soil areas, away from sandstone outcrops. Ecology Geocarpon is a small succulent plant that grows to Consider the balance between adverse and about 1.5” tall. It is an annual that germinates in beneficial practices when determining the overall November and overwinters as a tiny rosette. Plants effect of a conservation practice. bloom the following spring from mid-March to early May, and die 4 to 6 weeks later, after seed set. As the fruits mature, the plant turns from green to a striking magenta or “red wine” color. Geocarpon grows on Channel sandstone glades and outcrops in shallow sandy depressions, where not crowded out by deeper-rooted plants. In Missouri, geocarpon is found in Cedar, Dade, Polk, Greene, Lawrence, Henry and St. Clair Counties. Geocarpon can also be found in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas. Photo Credit: Missouri Department of Conservation Reasons for Decline Geocarpon is threatened by conversion of glade Beneficial Practices habitat to non-native species such as cool season Using prescribed fire to remove accumulated pasture grasses.
    [Show full text]
  • Programmatic Biological Assessment And
    PROGRAMMATIC BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AND PROGRAMMTIC BIOLOGICAL OPINION FOR THE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE’S ARKANSAS HEALTHY FOREST RESERVE PROGRAM Written by U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arkansas Ecological Services Field Office and Natural Resources Conservation Service Arkansas State Office August 25, 2006 Introduction This represents the United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) programmatic biological opinion (PBO) regarding the Healthy Forest Reserve Program (HFRP) in Arkansas. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and the Service have jointly agreed to a streamlined consultation process whereby a biological assessment and biological opinion are jointly developed. Therefore, this document serves as the NRCS’ biological assessment and the Service’s biological opinion of the proposed HFRP and potential impacts to the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Geocarpon minimum (no common name), pondberry (Lindera melissifolia), pink mucket (Lampsilis abrupta), winged mapleleaf (Quadrula fragosa), and Ouachita rock-pocketbook (Arkansia wheeleri) from activities associated with this program. The purpose of this PBA/PBO is to expedite consultations on proposed HFRP activities. This consultation document has been prepared pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (Act) (16 United States Code [U.S.C.] 1531 et seq.) and 50 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] §402 of our interagency regulations governing section 7 of the ESA. Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA requires federal agencies to consult with the Service to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any federally listed species nor destroy or adversely modify critical habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Golf Courses Lack
    CENTRAL TEXAS Golf Guide Independence Title LEARN MORE IndependenceTitle.com PUBLIC COURSES Blackhawk Golf Club 18 | Par 72 2714 Kelly Ln, Pflugerville | blackhawkgolf.com Measuring more than 7,000 yards from the championship tees, the course and slope ratings are 74.5 and 125 respectively. Blackhawk features a links-style layout that has proven tough enough to host several professional mini-tour events. Bluebonnet Hill Golf Club 18 | Par 72 9100 Decker Lane, Austin | bluebonnethillgolf.com Bluebonnet Hill Golf Course offers players of all skill levels a challenging and enjoyable round of golf. The course is laid out over the rolling hills just 15 minutes east of downtown Austin on Decker Lane. The course is in excellent shape with impeccable 328 Bermuda greens. Butler Park Pitch & Putt 9 | Par 27 201 Lee Barton Dr, Austin | butlerparkpitchandputt.com Butler Park Pitch and Putt is a nine hole, par 3 course near downtown Austin, the Hike and Bike Trail, and Lady Bird Lake. This is a golf course for everyone, from beginner golfers to pro's like Ben Crenshaw. It features large, shady pecan trees, water and grass traps, challenging holes, a very diverse clientèle, and friendly and helpful employees. Falconhead Golf Club 18 | Par 72 15201 Falconhead Blvd, Austin | falconheadaustin.com Falconhead Golf Club opened in 2003, an incredible addition to Austin golf. Laid out by the experts from the PGA Tour Design Center, this public daily-fee course offers golfers a taste of quality golf. Grey Rock Golf Club 18 | Par 72 7401 Texas Hwy 45, Austin | greyrockgolfclub.com Towering oaks provide the perfect runway on every drive.
    [Show full text]
  • Forwarded Message
    Volume 11, Number 4 October-November-December 1997 Nancy R. Morin and Judith M. Unger, Co-editors FLORA OF NORTH AMERICA NEWS The Flora of North America office has moved from the basement of the Administration Building—our home for about nine years—to the first floor of the new Monsanto Center at the Missouri Botanical Garden. We have graduated from frosted basement windows, where we could only tell if it was cloudy or sunny, to a south-facing wall of nothing but windows, with blinds to keep out too much sunlight. Come visit us in our new home. All of our phone numbers and our fax number have remained the same. The P.O. Box number is the same (299) as well as the zip code of 63166-0299, but our street address for package deliveries is 4500 Shaw Blvd. with a zip code of 63110. * * * * * Dr. Gerald Bane Straley (1945-1997) On 11 December 1997, we lost a friend and colleague, Gerald B. Straley, following a long and courageous battle. His continual optimism during his illness was an inspiration to all who knew him. Gerald was a Regional Coordinator, member of the Editorial Committee, and author for the FNA project. Gerald grew up on the family farm in Virginia and this undoubtedly initiated his great interest in nature. He completed his B.Sc. degree in Ornamental Horticulture at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and then went to Ohio University to study for his M.Sc. in Botany. In 1976, he came to do his Ph.D. on Arnica at the University of British Columbia under the guidance of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Forests, Woodlands and Savannas
    DRAFT DESCRIPTIONS OF SYSTEMS, MAPPING SUBSYSTEMS, AND VEGETATION TYPES FOR PHASE I Lee Elliott 25 February 2009 The following descriptions cover the systems that have been identified for the legend for Phase I of the Ecological Systems Classification and Mapping Project in support of the Texas Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Many of these descriptions were drafted from System descriptions available from NatureServe (http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/). Most System descriptions were modified, and all Vegetation Type descriptions were generated from discussions regarding these cover types. These brief narratives generally focus on ‘typical’ type concepts, and mapped vegetation types often circumscribe more variation on the ground than what is described here. For each system, a number of cover types, or “Vegetation Types” were described. A common name is given for each Vegetation Type, and this name is used in the table of contents and for the map legend. Additionally, a second name is provided which more directly ties the Vegetation Type to the system of which it is a part. A numeric identifier is also provided. This identifier represents the identifier used by NatureServe for the system. For the Vegetation Type, a digit suffix is provided to distinguish the various cover types within the system. In parentheses directly following the common name of the Vegetation Type, a number is provided. This number represents the numeric code used to track the Vegetation Types during the mapping process. Significant input was provided by all partners (Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, NatureServe, Missouri Resource Assessment Partnership, and The Nature Conservancy) during development of these descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment
    Ladd, D. and J.R. Thomas. 2015. Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora for Floristic Quality Assessment. Phytoneuron 2015-12: 1–274. Published 12 February 2015. ISSN 2153 733X ECOLOGICAL CHECKLIST OF THE MISSOURI FLORA FOR FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT DOUGLAS LADD The Nature Conservancy 2800 S. Brentwood Blvd. St. Louis, Missouri 63144 [email protected] JUSTIN R. THOMAS Institute of Botanical Training, LLC 111 County Road 3260 Salem, Missouri 65560 [email protected] ABSTRACT An annotated checklist of the 2,961 vascular taxa comprising the flora of Missouri is presented, with conservatism rankings for Floristic Quality Assessment. The list also provides standardized acronyms for each taxon and information on nativity, physiognomy, and wetness ratings. Annotated comments for selected taxa provide taxonomic, floristic, and ecological information, particularly for taxa not recognized in recent treatments of the Missouri flora. Synonymy crosswalks are provided for three references commonly used in Missouri. A discussion of the concept and application of Floristic Quality Assessment is presented. To accurately reflect ecological and taxonomic relationships, new combinations are validated for two distinct taxa, Dichanthelium ashei and D. werneri , and problems in application of infraspecific taxon names within Quercus shumardii are clarified. CONTENTS Introduction Species conservatism and floristic quality Application of Floristic Quality Assessment Checklist: Rationale and methods Nomenclature and taxonomic concepts Synonymy Acronyms Physiognomy, nativity, and wetness Summary of the Missouri flora Conclusion Annotated comments for checklist taxa Acknowledgements Literature Cited Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora Table 1. C values, physiognomy, and common names Table 2. Synonymy crosswalk Table 3. Wetness ratings and plant families INTRODUCTION This list was developed as part of a revised and expanded system for Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) in Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • BASTROP COUNTY TOGETHER We Are the Tools for RECOVERY
    BASTROP COUNTY TOGETHER we are the tools for RECOVERY PREPARED BY BASTROP COUNTY COMMUNITY REFORESTATION PROGRAM TOGETHER we are the tools for RECOVERY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE YEAR I PLANTING SEASON TABLE OF CONTENTS MISSION STATEMENT STATEMENT OF NEED PURPOSE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES KEY COMPONENTS YEAR 1 PLANTING SEASON (January 2012 through March 2013) YEARS 2 THROUGH 5 PLANTING SEASONS (NoVember 2013 through March 2017) YEAR 1 PLANTING SEASON (January 2012 through March 2013) EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH POST-PLANTING EVALUATION YEARS 2 THROUGH 5 PLANTING SEASONS (NoVember 2013 through March 2017) LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. ESTIMATED OVERALL TREE AVAILABILITY FOR REFORESTATION OF THE LOST PINES FOREST IMPACTED BY THE 2011 BCCF TABLE 2. BCCRP PLANTING AND EVENT SHEDULE LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. IMPACT AREA OF 2011 BASTROP COUNTY COMPLEX FIRE (BCCF) FIGURE 2. PARCELS SENT APPLICATIONS FIGURE 3. PARCELS WITH RETURNED APPLICATIONS ON FILE (AS OF FEB 15, 2013) FIGURE 4. PARCELS SERVED THROUGH TREE PLANTING VENDOR FIGURE 5. PARCELS SERVED THROUGH COMMUNITY PLANTING EVENTS FIGURE 6. PARCELS SERVED THROUGH TREE PLANTING WORKSHOPS LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A. APPLICATION FOR REFORESTATION SERVICES APPENDIX B. TREE PLANTING SITE PLAN APPENDIX C. TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR TREE ESTABLISHMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE APPENDIX D. LANDOWNER’S HANDBOOK APPENDIX E. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS APPENDIX F. PROGRAM OVERVIEW PAGE | I BASTROP COUNTY COMMUNITY REFORESTATION PROGRAM TOGETHER we are the tools for RECOVERY COMPREHENSIVE
    [Show full text]