DOCSLIB.ORG

On Thinking-Of-The-Other Entre IKMS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

On Thinking-of-the-Other entre IKMS Emmanuel Levinas Translated from the French by Michael B. Smith and Barbara Harshav Columbia University Press NEW YORK Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex Copyright © 1998 Columbia University Press Entre Nous: Esscds sur le penser-a-l'autre © Editions Grasset & Fasquelle 1991 All rights reserved Columbia University Press wishes to express its appreciation of assistance given by the government of France through Le Ministere de la Culture in the preparation of this translation. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Levinas, Emmanuel. [Entre nous. English] Entre nous : on thinlring-of-the-other / Emmanuel Levinas; translated from the French by Michael B. Smith and Barbara Harshav. p. cm. ~ (European perspectives) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-231-07910-9 (cloth)—ISBN 0-231-07911^7 (pbk.) 1. Philosophy. I. Tide. II. Series. B2430.L483E5813 1998 194—dc2i Casebound editions of Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America e Designed by Chang Jae Lee c 10 987654321 EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES A Series in Social Thought and Cultural Criticism Lawrence D. Kritzman, Editor EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES presents outstanding books by leading European thinkers. With both classic and contemporary works, the series aims to shape the major intellectual controversies of our day and to facilitate the tasks of historical understanding. For a complete list of books in the series, see page 257. Julia Kristeva Strangers to Ourselves Theodor W. Adorno Notes to Literature, vols. 1 and 2 Richard Wolin, editor The Heidegger Controversy Antonio Gramsci Prison Notebooks, vols. 1 and 2 Jacques LeGoff History and Memory Alain Finkielkraut Remembering in Vain: The Klaus Barbie Trial and Crimes Against Humanity Julia Kristeva Nations Without Nationalism Pierre Bourdieu The Field of Cultural Production Pierre Vidal-Naquet Assassins of Memory: Essays on the Denial of the Holocaust Hugo Ball Critique on German Intelligentsia Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari What Is Philosophy? Karl Heinz Bohrer Suddenness: On the Moment of Aesthetic Appearance Alain Finkielkraut The Defeat of the Mind Julia Kristeva New Maladies of the Soul Elisabeth Badinter XY: On Masculine Identity Karl L6with Martin Heidegger and European Nihilism Gilles Deleuze Negotiations, iQyz^iggo Pierre Vidal-Naquet The Jews: History, Memory, and the Present Norbert Elias The Germans Louis Althusser Writings on Psychoanalysis: Freud and Lacan Elisabeth Roudinesco Jacques Lacan: His Life and Work Ross Guberman Julia Kristeva Interviews Kelly Oliver The Portable Kristeva Pierre Nora Realms of Memory: The Construction of the French Past, vol. 1: Conflicts and Divisions, vol. 2: Ttraditions, vol. 3: Symbols Claudine Fabre-Vassas The Singular Beast: Jews, Christians, and the Pig Paul Ricoeur Critique and Conviction: Conversations with Francois A^ouvi and Marc de Launay Theodor W. Adorno Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords Alain Corbin Village Bells: Sound and Meaning in the Nineteenth-Century French Countryside Zygmunt Bauman Globalisation: The Human Consequences Jean-Louis Flandrin and Massimo Montanari Food: A Culinary History Alain Finkielkraut In the Name of Humanity: Reflections on the Twentieth Century Julia Kristeva The Sense and Non-Sense of Revolt: The Powers and Limits of Psychoanalysis Contents entre Translator s Achwwledgments IX Author's Preface XI ONE Is Ontology Fundamental? i TWO The /and the Totality 13 THREE Levy-Bruhl and Contemporary Philosophy 39 FOUR A Man-God? 53 FIVE A New Rationality: On Gabriel Marcel 61 SIX Hermeneutics and the Beyond 65 SEVEN Philosophy and Awakening 77 EIGHT Useless Suffering 91 NINE Philosophy, Justice, and Love 103 TEN Nonintentional Consciousness 123 ELEVEN From the One to the Other: Transcendence and Time 133 TWELVE The Rights of Man and Good Will 155 THIRTEEN Diachrony and Representation J59 FOURTEEN The Philosophical Determination of the Idea of Culture 179 FIFTEEN Uniqueness 189 SIXTEEN Totality and Infinity. Preface to the German Edition 197 SEVENTEEN Dialogue on Thinking-of-the-Other 201 EIGHTEEN "Dying for..." 207 NINETEEN The Idea of the Infinite in Us 219 TWENTY The Other, Utopia, and Justice 223 Notes 235 Index 251 Translators' Acknowledgments Michael B. Smith wishes to thank Berry College for its encouragement and support and Martha Reynolds of the Memorial Library for her professional assis­ tance. And he is very grateful for the forbearance of his wife, Helen, whose spouse was, for the larger part of a summer, "lost in translation." Barbara Harshav wishes to thank Professor Robert Gibbs, of Princeton University, who good-naturedly devoted much time and effort to this project. Author's Preface entre noy The essays in this volume are arranged in chronolog­ ical order of their appearance in various philosophi­ cal publications. "Is Ontology Fundamental?," dat­ ing from 1951, gives a general sense of what will be discussed in the subsequent essays. The rationality of the human psyche is explored in the inter subjective relation, the relationship of one person to another, in the transcendence of the "for-the-other" initiating the "ethical subject," which initiates the entre-nous. What motivates these pages is not some urgent need to return to ethics for the purpose of developing ab ovo a code in which the structures and rules for good private conduct, public policy, and peace between nations would be set forth, however funda­ mental the ethical values implied in these chapters may appear to be. The main intent here is to try to see ethics in relation to the rationality of the knowledge that is immanent in being, and that is primordial in the philosophical tradition of the West; even if ethics— ultimately going beyond the forms and determina­ tions of ontology, but without rejecting the peace of reason—could achieve a different form of intelligi­ bility and a different way of loving wisdom;1 and per­ haps even—but I will not go that far—the way of Psalm 111:10. I will set out from being in the verbal sense of that word: neither from "beings"2—physical ob­ jects, living bodies, human individuals—nor from nature, which encompasses them all in one way or another in its totality. 3 I will set out from being in the verbal sense of the word, in which h being is suggested and understood, in a sense, as a process of being, an * event of being, an adventure of being. A remarkable adventure! The co event of being is in a concern with being; it would appear to be its only * way of being, in its elan which is "essentially" finite and completely £; absorbed in this concern with being. In a sense, the only thing at issue % for the event of being is the being of that very being. To be as such is, from the first, to be preoccupied with being, as if some relaxation were already necessary, some "tranquilizer," in order to remain—while being—unconcerned about being. To be: already an insistence on being as if a "survival instinct" that coincided with its development, preserv­ ing it, and maintaining it in its adventure of being, were its meaning. The tensing of being back onto itself, a plot in which the reflexive pro­ noun, -self, is bound up.3 An insistence before all light and decision, the secret of a savagery excluding deliberation and calculation, violence in the guise of beings who affirm themselves "without regard" for one another in their concern to be. Origin of all violence, varying with the various modes of being: the life of the living, the existence of human beings, the reality of things. The life of the living in the struggle for life; the natural history of human beings in the blood and tears of wars between individuals, nations, and classes; the matter of things, hard matter; solidity; the closed-in-upon-self, all the way down to the level of the subatomic par­ ticles of which physicists speak. But behold! The emergence, in the life lived by the human being (and it is here that the human, as such, begins—pure eventuality, but from the start an eventuality that is pure and holy), of the devoting-of- oneself-to-the-other. In the general economy of being in its inflection back upon itself, a preoccupation with the other, even to the point of sacrifice, even to the possibility of dying for him or her; a responsibili­ ty for the other. Otherwise than being! It is this shattering of indiffer­ ence—even if indifference is statistically dominant—this possibility of one-for-the-other, that constitutes the ethical event. When human exis­ tence interrupts and goes beyond its effort to be—its Spinozan conatus essendft—there is a vocation of an existing-for-the-other stronger than the threat of death: the fellow human being's existential adventure mat­ ters to the /more than its own, posing from the start the /as responsi- X ble for the being of the other; responsible, that is, unique and elect, as % an I who is no longer just any individual member of the human race. It m is as if the emergence of the human in the economy of being upset the * meaning and plot and philosophical rank of ontology: the in-itself of w being-persisting-in-being goes beyond itself in the gratuitousness of * the outside-of-itself-for-the-other, in sacrifice, or the possibility of sac- £ rifice, in the perspective of holiness. n entre nous Is Ontology Fundamental? one entre nous The Primacy of Ontology The primacy of ontology among the branches of knowledge would appear to rest on the clearest evi­ dence, for all knowledge of relations connecting or opposing beings to one another implies an under­ standing of the fact that these beings and relations exist.
Recommended publications
  • Fyodorov's Meontology

    Fyodorov's Meontology

    III. NON-STANDARD TRAITS OF 20TH CENTURY AND RECENT PHILOSOPHY 157 Fyodorov’s Meontology Myroslav Feodosijevič Hryschko (University of Ljubljana) Abstract The text treats the philosophy of Nikolai Fyodorovich Fyodorov as a meontology; that is, as a metaphysics irreducible to ontology. This treatment starts from a certain non-ontological symptom within Fyodorov’s texts and develops two philosophemes found in The Philosophy of the Common Task: The Task qua immortality and resurrection, and Fyodorov’s shift of ontol- ogy from the question “Why does the existing exist?” to “Why do the living die?” Resurrection and immortality are not developed as some ethical re- joinder to the latter question but rather, both philosophemes are posited to- gether as constitutive of a prospective Fyodorovian meontology. Using the contemporary speculative anti-humanism of Badiou, Brassier, Grant, Meil- lassoux, etc., and the anthropic-transcendental lineage of Kant and Heideg- ger as points of both accession and tension, the possibility of resurrection and immortality coupled with the death of being suggests the excision of any constancy or necessity to ontology, to both Being or beings, thus entail- ing the rudiments of such a meontology. 1. Introduction The metabasis eis allo genos that is Fyodorov’s transposition of the ontological question “Why does the existing exist?” to “Why do the living die?”1 is not a vitalism; it is not an appropriation of ontology in terms of a theoretical concern accorded to what may be provisionally formulated as a problem of the organic. This misprision is coextensive to the misprision concerning the decisive status of resurrection and immortality in The Phi- losophy of the Common Task.
  • The Poverty of Socratic Questioning: Asking and Answering in the Meno

    The Poverty of Socratic Questioning: Asking and Answering in the Meno

    University of Cincinnati University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications Faculty Articles and Other Publications College of Law Faculty Scholarship 1994 The oP verty of Socratic Questioning: Asking and Answering In The eM no Thomas D. Eisele University of Cincinnati College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.uc.edu/fac_pubs Part of the Legal Education Commons Recommended Citation Eisele, Thomas D., "The oP verty of Socratic Questioning: Asking and Answering In The eM no" (1994). Faculty Articles and Other Publications. Paper 36. http://scholarship.law.uc.edu/fac_pubs/36 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law Faculty Scholarship at University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Articles and Other Publications by an authorized administrator of University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE POVERTY OF SOCRATIC QUESTIONING: ASKING AND ANSWERING IN THE MEND Thomas D. Eisele* I understand [philosophy 1 as a willingness to think not about some­ thing other than what ordinary human beings think about, but rather to learn to think undistractedly about things that ordinary human beings cannot help thinking about, or anyway cannot help having occur to them, sometimes in fantasy, sometimes asa flash across a landscape; such things, for example, as whether we can know the world as it is in itself, or whether others really know the nature of one's own experiences, or whether good and bad are relative, or whether we might not now be dreaming that we are awake, or whether modern tyrannies and weapons and spaces and speeds and art are continuous with the past of the human race or discontinuous, and hence whether the learning of the human race is not irrelevant to the problems it has brought before itself.
  • The Roles of Solon in Plato's Dialogues

    The Roles of Solon in Plato's Dialogues

    The Roles of Solon in Plato’s Dialogues Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Samuel Ortencio Flores, M.A. Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Bruce Heiden, Advisor Anthony Kaldellis Richard Fletcher Greg Anderson Copyrighy by Samuel Ortencio Flores 2013 Abstract This dissertation is a study of Plato’s use and adaptation of an earlier model and tradition of wisdom based on the thought and legacy of the sixth-century archon, legislator, and poet Solon. Solon is cited and/or quoted thirty-four times in Plato’s dialogues, and alluded to many more times. My study shows that these references and allusions have deeper meaning when contextualized within the reception of Solon in the classical period. For Plato, Solon is a rhetorically powerful figure in advancing the relatively new practice of philosophy in Athens. While Solon himself did not adequately establish justice in the city, his legacy provided a model upon which Platonic philosophy could improve. Chapter One surveys the passing references to Solon in the dialogues as an introduction to my chapters on the dialogues in which Solon is a very prominent figure, Timaeus- Critias, Republic, and Laws. Chapter Two examines Critias’ use of his ancestor Solon to establish his own philosophic credentials. Chapter Three suggests that Socrates re- appropriates the aims and themes of Solon’s political poetry for Socratic philosophy. Chapter Four suggests that Solon provides a legislative model which Plato reconstructs in the Laws for the philosopher to supplant the role of legislator in Greek thought.
  • Beauty As a Transcendental in the Thought of Joseph Ratzinger

    Beauty As a Transcendental in the Thought of Joseph Ratzinger

    The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Theses 2015 Beauty as a transcendental in the thought of Joseph Ratzinger John Jang University of Notre Dame Australia Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses Part of the Philosophy Commons COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice. Publication Details Jang, J. (2015). Beauty as a transcendental in the thought of Joseph Ratzinger (Master of Philosophy (School of Philosophy and Theology)). University of Notre Dame Australia. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/112 This dissertation/thesis is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. School of Philosophy and Theology Sydney Beauty as a Transcendental in the Thought of Joseph Ratzinger Submitted by John Jang A thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Philosophy Supervised by Dr. Renée Köhler-Ryan July 2015 © John Jang 2015 Table of Contents Abstract v Declaration of Authorship vi Acknowledgements vii Introduction 1 Structure 3 Method 5 PART I - Metaphysical Beauty 7 1.1.1 The Integration of Philosophy and Theology 8 1.1.2 Ratzinger’s Response 11 1.2.1 Transcendental Participation 14 1.2.2 Transcendental Convertibility 18 1.2.3 Analogy of Being 25 PART II - Reason and Experience 28 2.
  • Deconstructing Emmanuel Levinas' Aesthetics

    Deconstructing Emmanuel Levinas' Aesthetics

    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Deconstructing Emmanuel Levinas’ Aesthetics: A Reading of The Seagram Murals ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Uskontotieteen pro gradu-tutkielma Teologinen tiedekunta Kira Zaitsev ! 29.8.2014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO − HELSINGFORS UNIVERSITET Tiedekunta/Osasto − Fakultet/Sektion Laitos − Institution Teologinen tiedekunta uskontotieteen laitos Tekijä − Författare Kira Zaitsev Työn nimi − Arbetets titel Deconstructing Emmanuel Levinas’ Aesthetics: A Reading of the Seagram Murals Oppiaine − Läroämne uskontotiede Työn laji − Arbetets art Aika − Datum Sivumäärä − Sidoantal pro gradu 29.8.2014 63 !Tiivistelmä − Referat Emmanuel Levinas on ranskanjuutalainen filosofi, jonka filosofia keskittyy etiikkaan ja toisen kohtaamiseen. Tämä pro gradu keskittyy Levinaksen estetiikkaan, joka on riippuvainen hänen !”ensimmäisestä filosofiastaan”, eli etiikasta. Työn tutkimuskysymykset ovat Kuinka Levinaksen estetiikka on muodostunut sekä kuinka Mark Rothkon Seagram Murals-maalauksia tulisi arvioida Levinaksen estetiikan pohjalta. Tämän !lisäksi työ pohdiskelee juutalaisen filosofian mahdollisuutta ja fiosofian luonnetta. Pro gradussa arvioidaan ensin Levinaksen laajempaa filosofiaa feministisen dekonstruktion avulla, joka paljastaa filosofian näennäisen rationaalisuuden ja Levinaksen naisvihamielisen paikantumisen. Tämän jälkeen gradussa arvioidaan Levinaksen estetiikkaa ja pohditaan Levinaksen estetiikan rajoja ensin tarkastelemalla Levinaksen argumenttien koherenttiutta hyväksikäyttäen Jacques Derridan kuva — merkki-analyysia, ja tämän jälkeen
  • Emmanuel Levinas

    Emmanuel Levinas

    14 Emmanuel Levinas Contact and Interruption AMIT PINCHEVSKI ________________________________________ Emmanuel Levinas was one of the greatest philosophers of the twentieth century, yet has only been recently acknowledged as such. He proposed a radically different way to approach ethical questions—in fact, to approach the question of ethics itself. An heir to the phenomenological tradition of Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger, his thought came to problematize the foundations upon which lies the work of his teachers. While his presence among French academic circles remained relatively marginal for most of his career, his work nevertheless informed some of the key debates in continental philosophy of the latter half of the century, and had a decisive impact on a generation of thinkers such as Jacques Derrida, Maurice Blanchot, Jean-François Lyotard, Jean-Luc Nancy, Jean-Luc Marion, Enrique Dussel, and Luce Irigaray. For the better part of his life, Levinas studied and taught the Talmud, whose wisdom he attempted to introduce to various philosophical and contemporary questions. Indeed, one way to describe his philosophy is as a consistent effort to implicate “Greek” with “Hebrew,” that is, to translate the ethical message of Judaism into the Western philosophical discourse. Looming over Levinas was the dark shadow of the Holocaust, which claimed most of his family and in many respects dominated the development of his work. Born in 1906 in Lithuania to a Jewish Orthodox family, Levinas became acquainted with the Hebrew Bible from a young age. During the First World War, his family fled to the Ukraine, where he witnessed the first stages of the Russian Revolution.
  • Heidegger As Levinas's Guide to Judaism Beyond Philosophy

    Heidegger As Levinas's Guide to Judaism Beyond Philosophy

    religions Article Heidegger as Levinas’s Guide to Judaism beyond Philosophy Elad Lapidot Faculty of Theology, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; [email protected] Abstract: This essay reflects on the way that Emmanuel Levinas stages the difference between Judaism and Philosophy, namely how he approaches Jewish thought as a concrete other of philosophy. The claim is that this mise en scène underlies Levinas’s oeuvre not only as a discourse about the Other, but as a real scene of an actual encounter with otherness, namely the encounter of philosophy with the epistemic otherness of Judaism. It is in the turn to Jewish thought beyond Philosophy that the essay identifies Heidegger’s strongest influence on Levinas. The essay’s reflection is performed through a reading of Levinas’s first major philosophical work of 1961, Totality and Infinity. The encounter between Philosophy and Judaism is explored in this context both as an epistemic and as a political event. Keywords: Heidegger; Levinas; totality and infinity; philosophy; Judaism; politics The name Heidegger has come to designate a singular phenomenon in the history of thought. The combination of powerful philosophical insight with powerful political shortsightedness (to say the least) has been producing what we can call tormented reception, namely generations of thinkers feeling uneasy about how deeply they were indebted to Heidegger. So uneasy, since their most ingenious attempts of taking distance from Heidegger were still inspired by his thought, and so brought them again and ever closer to Citation: Lapidot, Elad. 2021. him. Especially concerned were Heidegger’s direct students, and above all the Jewish ones, 1 Heidegger as Levinas’s Guide to such as Emmanuel Levinas.
  • Laura Stark Peasants, Pilgrims, and Sacred Promises Ritual and the Supernatural in Orthodox Karelian Folk Religion

    Laura Stark Peasants, Pilgrims, and Sacred Promises Ritual and the Supernatural in Orthodox Karelian Folk Religion

    laura stark Peasants, Pilgrims, and Sacred Promises Ritual and the Supernatural in Orthodox Karelian Folk Religion Studia Fennica Folkloristica The Finnish Literature Society (SKS) was founded in 1831 and has, from the very beginning, engaged in publishing operations. It nowadays publishes literature in the fields of ethnology and folkloristics, linguistics, literary research and cultural history. The first volume of the Studia Fennica series appeared in 1933. Since 1992, the series has been divided into three thematic subseries: Ethnologica, Folkloristica and Linguistica. Two additional subseries were formed in 2002, Historica and Litteraria. The subseries Anthropologica was formed in 2007. In addition to its publishing activities, the Finnish Literature Society maintains research activities and infrastructures, an archive containing folklore and literary collections, a research library and promotes Finnish literature abroad. Studia fennica editorial board Anna-Leena Siikala Rauno Endén Teppo Korhonen Pentti Leino Auli Viikari Kristiina Näyhö Editorial Office SKS P.O. Box 259 FI-00171 Helsinki www.finlit.fi Laura Stark Peasants, Pilgrims, and Sacred Promises Ritual and the Supernatural in Orthodox Karelian Folk Religion Finnish Literature Society • Helsinki 3 Studia Fennica Folkloristica 11 The publication has undergone a peer review. The open access publication of this volume has received part funding via Helsinki University Library. © 2002 Laura Stark and SKS License CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International. A digital edition of a printed book first published in 2002 by the Finnish Literature Society. Cover Design: Timo Numminen EPUB: eLibris Media Oy ISBN 978-951-746-366-9 (Print) ISBN 978-951-746-578-6 (PDF) ISBN 978-952-222-766-9 (EPUB) ISSN 0085-6835 (Studia Fennica) ISSN 1235-1946 (Studia Fennica Folkloristica) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21435/sff.11 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
  • Aesthetics After Finitude Anamnesis Anamnesis Means Remembrance Or Reminiscence, the Collection and Re- Collection of What Has Been Lost, Forgotten, Or Effaced

    Aesthetics After Finitude Anamnesis Anamnesis Means Remembrance Or Reminiscence, the Collection and Re- Collection of What Has Been Lost, Forgotten, Or Effaced

    Aesthetics After Finitude Anamnesis Anamnesis means remembrance or reminiscence, the collection and re- collection of what has been lost, forgotten, or effaced. It is therefore a matter of the very old, of what has made us who we are. But anamnesis is also a work that transforms its subject, always producing something new. To recollect the old, to produce the new: that is the task of Anamnesis. a re.press series Aesthetics After Finitude Baylee Brits, Prudence Gibson and Amy Ireland, editors re.press Melbourne 2016 re.press PO Box 40, Prahran, 3181, Melbourne, Australia http://www.re-press.org © the individual contributors and re.press 2016 This work is ‘Open Access’, published under a creative commons license which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form whatso- ever and that you in no way alter, transform or build on the work outside of its use in normal aca- demic scholarship without express permission of the author (or their executors) and the publisher of this volume. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. For more information see the details of the creative commons licence at this website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Title: Aesthetics after finitude / Baylee Brits, Prudence Gibson and Amy Ireland, editors. ISBN: 9780980819793 (paperback) Series: Anamnesis Subjects: Aesthetics.
  • Being Is Double

    Being Is Double

    Being is double Jean-Luc Marion and John Milbank on God, being and analogy Nathan Edward Lyons B. A. (Adv.) (Hons.) This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy School of Philosophy Australian Catholic University Graduate Research Office Locked Bag 4115 Fitzroy, Victoria 3065 1st March 2014 i ABSTRACT This thesis examines the contemporary dispute between philosopher Jean-Luc Marion and theologian John Milbank concerning the relation of God to being and the nature of theological analogy. I argue that Marion and Milbank begin from a shared opposition to Scotist univocity but tend in opposite directions in elaborating their constructive theologies. Marion takes an essentially Dionysian approach, emphasising the divine transcendence “beyond being” to such a degree as to produce an essentially equivocal account of theological analogy. Milbank, on the other hand, inspired particularly by Eckhart, affirms a strong version of the Thomist thesis that God is “being itself” and emphasises divine immanence to such a degree that the analogical distinction between created and uncreated being is virtually collapsed. Both thinkers claim fidelity to the premodern Christian theological tradition, but I show that certain difficulties attend both of their claims. I suggest that the decisive issue between them is the authority which should be granted to Heidegger’s account of being and I argue that it is Milbank’s vision of post-Heideggerian theological method which is to be preferred. I conclude that Marion and Milbank give two impressive contemporary answers to the ancient riddle of “double being” raised in the Anonymous Commentary on Plato’s “Parmenides,” a riddle which queries the relation between absolute First being and derived Second being.
  • What Is Philosophy?

    What Is Philosophy?

    WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? Embodiment Signification Ideality Jere Surber What is Philosophy? Anamnesis Anamnesis means remembrance or reminiscence, the collection and re-collection of what has been lost, forgotten, or effaced. It is therefore a matter of the very old, of what has made us who we are. But anamnesis is also a work that transforms its subject, always producing something new. To recollect the old, to produce the new: that is the task of Anamnesis. a re.press series What is Philosophy? Embodiment, Signification, Ideality Jere O’Neill Surber re.press Melbourne 2014 re.press PO Box 40, Prahran, 3181, Melbourne, Australia http://www.re-press.org © re.press and Jere O’Neill Surber 2014 The moral rights of the author are automatically asserted and recognized under Australian law (Copyright Amendment [Moral Rights] Act 2000) This work is ‘Open Access’, published under a creative commons license which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form whatsoever and that you in no way alter, transform or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without express permission of the author (or their executors) and the publisher of this volume. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. For more informa- tion see the details of the creative commons licence at this website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry O’Neill Surber, Jere, author.
  • A Buddhist Inspiration for a Contemporary Psychotherapy

    A Buddhist Inspiration for a Contemporary Psychotherapy

    1 A BUDDHIST INSPIRATION FOR A CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY Gay Watson Thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the School of Oriental & African Studies, University of London. 1996 ProQuest Number: 10731695 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10731695 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT It is almost exactly one hundred years since the popular and not merely academic dissemination of Buddhism in the West began. During this time a dialogue has grown up between Buddhism and the Western discipline of psychotherapy. It is the contention of this work that Buddhist philosophy and praxis have much to offer a contemporary psychotherapy. Firstly, in general, for its long history of the experiential exploration of mind and for the practices of cultivation based thereon, and secondly, more specifically, for the relevance and resonance of specific Buddhist doctrines to contemporary problematics. Thus, this work attempts, on the basis of a three-way conversation between Buddhism, psychotherapy and various themes from contemporary discourse, to suggest a psychotherapy that may be helpful and relevant to the current horizons of thought and contemporary psychopathologies which are substantially different from those prevalent at the time of psychotherapy's early years.