An Ecocritical Approach to the Southern Novels Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Ecocritical Approach to the Southern Novels Of AN ECOCRITICAL APPROACH TO THE SOUTHERN NOVELS OF CORMAC MCCARTHY by PAUL SANDERS QUICK (Under the Direction of Hugh Ruppersburg) ABSTRACT Using the three streams of radical environmental philosophy—deep ecology, ecofeminism, and social ecology—this study highlights the subtle and complex environmental ethic in Cormac McCarthy’s southern novels. It also reassesses the critical consensus that these works are expressions of existentialist or nihilistic philosophy. By delineating the different relationships that McCarthy’s heroes and anti- heroes have with nonhuman nature, an ecocritical analysis views their alienation as the effect of their separation from nonhuman nature. At the root of this alienation is an anthropocentric and mechanistic mode of thinking that is dominant in Western philosophy and that this study defines as Cartesian. While McCarthy’s environmentalist heroes are persecuted by Cartesian institutions and displaced from the land on which they have defined themselves and made meaning, his Cartesian anti-heroes represent extreme manifestations of Cartesian thinking. McCarthy’s environmentalism is as much a critique and indictment of Cartesian thinking as it is a portrayal of the value of a life lived in close contact with nonhuman nature. INDEX WORDS: Cormac McCarthy, The Orchard Keeper, Child of God, Outer Dark, Suttree, ecocriticism, deep ecology, ecofeminism, social ecology, Cartesian thinking, environmental literature AN ECOCRITICAL APPROACH TO THE SOUTHERN NOVELS OF CORMAC MCCARTHY by PAUL SANDERS QUICK B.A., Duke University, 1990 M.A.T., Duke University, 1991 M.A., The University of Georgia, 1996 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ATHENS, GEORGIA 2004 © 2004 Paul Sanders Quick All Rights Reserved AN ECOCRITICAL APPROACH TO THE SOUTHERN NOVELS OF CORMAC MCCARTHY by PAUL SANDERS QUICK Major Professor: Hugh Ruppersburg Committee: Betty Jean Craige Hubert McAlexander Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2004 DEDICATION For Erica and Zachary iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My most immediate thanks go to my committee. Hugh Ruppersburg patiently read and reread various drafts of both the dissertation and the prospectus. His careful eye and insightful criticism have made this a much better project. Hubert McAlexander has supported me throughout my graduate career, and Betty Jean Craige gave me the confidence to write on ecocriticism. I also would like to acknowledge people who read portions of the dissertation and delivered excellent advice with delicate and loving care. Eric Whiteside introduced me to the work of Cormac McCarthy in the first place. My wife, Erica, and my friend (and mother-in- law), Jane Prater, supported me in many ways. Carla Buss at UGA’s Main Library acted as my personal reference librarian. Among the graduate students who boosted my confidence and encouraged my efforts were Molly Crumpton, Monica Smith, and Billie Bennett. At the Office of Instructional Support and Development, Katie Smith provided friendship, guidance, wisdom, and perspective when I have needed it. My parents are responsible for my love of literature. Thank you for a house filled with books, summers dedicated to reading, and exceptional educational opportunities. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................................................................v PREFACE..................................................................................................................................... vii CHAPTER 1 Approaching an Ecocritical Reading of Cormac McCarthy..........................................1 2 The Orchard Keeper and Child of God as Environmentalist Critiques of Cartesian Thinking ..................................................................................................................51 3 Ecofeminism, Child of God, and Outer Dark ............................................................105 4 Social Ecology, Urban Ecocriticism, and the Landscapes of Suttree........................158 5 Conclusion: McCarthy’s Growing Environmental Sensibility in His Southwestern Novels....................................................................................................................205 BIBLIOGRAPHY........................................................................................................................233 NOTES.........................................................................................................................................248 vi Preface While describing Cormac McCarthy’s “hostility to the literary world” in his 1992 New York Times article, Richard Woodward also reveals McCarthy’s personal interest in the natural world: At the MacArthur [Foundation] reunions [McCarthy] spends his time with scientists, like physicist Murray Gell-Mann and whale biologist Roger Payne, rather than other writers. One of the few [writers] he acknowledges having known at all was novelist and ecological crusader Edward Abbey. Shortly before Abbey’s death in 1989, they discussed a covert operation to reintroduce the wolf to southern Arizona. (Woodward 30) Such facts only confirm what any reader of McCarthy’s fiction knows—that nature matters. Nature is as much a character in his books as any human. William Schafer argues, “One of McCarthy’s astonishing talents is the intensely evocative quality of his landscapes and dramas of animal life. Fully as important as the human actions in the story are animals which emerge as more than symbolic—they are an analogical extension of the story of man in the landscape” (108). Closer to naturalism than Romanticism, McCarthy’s novels include exacting descriptions not only of animals but also of forests, caves, rivers, swamps, and deserts. In addition to his knowledge of the natural world, however, is an environmental ethic suggested by his conversation with Edward Abbey. Given the story of Billy Parham and she-wolf in The Crossing (1994), one can assume that McCarthy would favor the reintroduction of wolves to an ecosystem altered by humans for anthropocentric purposes. The value of such an operation, as vii Abbey certainly would have known, goes far beyond restoring an ancient predator to its hunting ground. The goal would be to rebalance a number of aspects of the Arizona landscape. Wolves would thin the overpopulation of herbivores, thereby protecting native vegetation from overgrazing, thereby minimizing soil erosion caused by wind and rain. While holistically beneficial to the environment, such a program has negative economic and public safety implications as well; wolves will kill domesticated livestock and endanger human lives. The difference between advocates of predator reintroduction and those against such a program is a difference between what this dissertation defines as environmental thinking and Cartesian thinking. Whereas the environmentalists consider the health of the whole ecosystem, the Cartesian is interested in how nature benefits humankind. It is precisely this conflict between environmentalist and Cartesian, holism and atomism, ecocentrism and anthropocentrism that characterizes my ecocritical approach to the southern novels of Cormac McCarthy. That McCarthy would share Abbey’s desire to reintroduce the wolf is also supported by another fact—his unpublished screenplay entitled “Whales and Men.” James Lilley describes it as overtly environmental.1 It tells the story of an Irish aristocrat, Peter Gregory, who “takes his seat in the House of Lords in order to save the whales” (Lilley 150): Peter and the crew of his friend’s ship, the Farfetched, have their lives “changed forever” when they watch a group of whales swim to their slaughter—an event that leads them to question their own relationship to the environment and that eventually propels Peter into environmental activism and causes John Western, a wealthy doctor, to give up his practice in the United States and volunteer his services to a war-torn “third world country.” (Lilley 155) viii Probably written between Blood Meridian (1985) and All the Pretty Horses (1992), “Whales and Men” is an antidote to the anthropocentrism of Blood Meridian’s Judge Holden. The screenplay attacks “the inherent destructiveness of the judge’s mode of vision, his method of writing history, and his grotesque anthropocentrism and instead celebrates the heterogeneity and autonomy of the natural world” (Lilly 155-56). Of course, it is impossible to escape anthropocentrism completely because our conceptions of nature and the language that we use to describe it are human constructs. Still, as Lawrence Buell argues, the attempt to “relinquish” the ego moves humans nearer to “feeling the environment to be at least as worthy of attention as oneself and of experiencing oneself as situated among many interacting presences” (178). What Buell describes and what McCarthy portrays is an expansion of an individual’s sense of self to include the wider world. In McCarthy’s attempts to shift from egocentrism to ecocentrism, he shows that the interaction between humans and nature is a relationship between “fluid, coterminous, coextensive systems” (Lilley 152). While Lilley and Buell focus on the role of language in this relationship between humans and nonhuman nature, I apply deep ecology, ecofeminism, and social ecology—the three streams of radical environmental philosophy—to investigate
Recommended publications
  • LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9759-y LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned Jennifer L. Heldmann · Anthony Colaprete · Diane H. Wooden · Robert F. Ackermann · David D. Acton · Peter R. Backus · Vanessa Bailey · Jesse G. Ball · William C. Barott · Samantha K. Blair · Marc W. Buie · Shawn Callahan · Nancy J. Chanover · Young-Jun Choi · Al Conrad · Dolores M. Coulson · Kirk B. Crawford · Russell DeHart · Imke de Pater · Michael Disanti · James R. Forster · Reiko Furusho · Tetsuharu Fuse · Tom Geballe · J. Duane Gibson · David Goldstein · Stephen A. Gregory · David J. Gutierrez · Ryan T. Hamilton · Taiga Hamura · David E. Harker · Gerry R. Harp · Junichi Haruyama · Morag Hastie · Yutaka Hayano · Phillip Hinz · Peng K. Hong · Steven P. James · Toshihiko Kadono · Hideyo Kawakita · Michael S. Kelley · Daryl L. Kim · Kosuke Kurosawa · Duk-Hang Lee · Michael Long · Paul G. Lucey · Keith Marach · Anthony C. Matulonis · Richard M. McDermid · Russet McMillan · Charles Miller · Hong-Kyu Moon · Ryosuke Nakamura · Hirotomo Noda · Natsuko Okamura · Lawrence Ong · Dallan Porter · Jeffery J. Puschell · John T. Rayner · J. Jedadiah Rembold · Katherine C. Roth · Richard J. Rudy · Ray W. Russell · Eileen V. Ryan · William H. Ryan · Tomohiko Sekiguchi · Yasuhito Sekine · Mark A. Skinner · Mitsuru Sôma · Andrew W. Stephens · Alex Storrs · Robert M. Suggs · Seiji Sugita · Eon-Chang Sung · Naruhisa Takatoh · Jill C. Tarter · Scott M. Taylor · Hiroshi Terada · Chadwick J. Trujillo · Vidhya Vaitheeswaran · Faith Vilas · Brian D. Walls · Jun-ihi Watanabe · William J. Welch · Charles E. Woodward · Hong-Suh Yim · Eliot F. Young Received: 9 October 2010 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 © The Author(s) 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Hip to Post45
    DAVID J. A L WORTH Hip to Post45 Michael Szalay, Hip Figures: A Literary History of the Democratic Party. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012. 324 pp. $24.95. here are we now?” About five years [ ] have passed since Amy Hungerford “ W asked this question in her assess- ment of the “revisionary work” that was undertaken by literary historians at the dawn of the twenty- first century.1 Juxtaposing Wendy Steiner’s contribution to The Cambridge History of American Literature (“Postmodern Fictions, 1970–1990”) with new scholarship by Rachel Adams, Mark McGurl, Deborah Nelson, and others, Hungerford aimed to demonstrate that “the period formerly known as contemporary” was being redefined and revitalized in exciting new ways by a growing number of scholars, particularly those associated with Post45 (410). Back then, Post45 named but a small “collective” of literary historians, “mainly just finishing first books or in the middle of second books” (416). Now, however, it designates something bigger and broader, a formidable institution dedi- cated to the study of American culture during the second half of the twentieth century and beyond. This institution comprises an ongoing sequence of academic conferences (including a large 1. Amy Hungerford, “On the Period Formerly Known as Contemporary,” American Literary History 20.1–2 (2008) 412. Subsequent references will appear in the text. Contemporary Literature 54, 3 0010-7484; E-ISSN 1548-9949/13/0003-0622 ᭧ 2013 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System ALWORTH ⋅ 623 gathering that took place at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 2011), a Web-based journal of peer-reviewed scholarship and book reviews (Post45), and a monograph series published by Stanford University Press (Post•45).
    [Show full text]
  • Postsecular Sermons in Contemporary American Fiction
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University English Dissertations Department of English Spring 6-30-2011 The Sermonic Urge: Postsecular Sermons in Contemporary American Fiction Peter W. Rorabaugh Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_diss Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Rorabaugh, Peter W., "The Sermonic Urge: Postsecular Sermons in Contemporary American Fiction." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2011. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_diss/75 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of English at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SERMONIC URGE: POSTSECULAR SERMONS IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN FICTION by PETER W. RORABAUGH Under the Direction of Christopher Kocela ABSTRACT Contemporary American novels over the last forty years have developed a unique orientation toward religious and spiritual rhetoric that can best be understood within the multidisciplinary concept of the postsecular. In the morally-tinged discourse of their characters, several esteemed American novelists (John Updike, Toni Morrison, Louise Erdrich, and Cormac McCarthy) since 1970 have used sermons or sermon-like artifacts to convey postsecular attitudes and motivations. These postsecular sermons express systems of belief that are hybrid, exploratory, and confessional in nature. Through rhetorical analysis of sermons in four contemporary American novels, this dissertation explores the performance of postsecularity in literature and defines the contribution of those tendancies to the field of literary and rhetorical studies. INDEX WORDS: Postsecular, Postmodern, Christianity, American literature, Sermon, Religious rhetoric, Ralph Ellison, Toni Morrison, Louise Erdrich, John Updike, Cormac McCarthy, Kenneth Burke, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Scholars' Perspective on John Updike's "Rabbit Tetralogy"1
    Linguistics and Literature Studies 8(1): 8-13, 2020 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/lls.2020.080102 Chinese Scholars' Perspective on John Updike's 1 "Rabbit Tetralogy" Zhao Cheng Foreign Languages Studies School, Soochow University, China Received Ocotber 15, 2019; Revised November 25, 2019; Accepted December 4, 2019 Copyright©2020 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract Updike's masterpiece, using skillful realism, most productive, and most awarded writers in the United succeeded in drawing a panoramic picture of the American States in the second half of the twentieth century. "Rabbit society from the 1950s to the early 1990s in the "Rabbit Tetralogy", Updike’s masterpiece, the core of the entire Tetralogy." Updike strives to reflect the changes in literary creation system of Updike, composed of "Rabbit contemporary American social culture for nearly half a Run" (1960), "Rabbit Redux" (1971), "Rabbit is Rich" century from the "rabbit" Harry, the everyman of the (1981), and "Rabbit at Rest" (1991), represents the highest American society and the life experiences of his ordinary achievement of the writer’s novel creation. In famil y. "Rabbit Tetralogy" truly reflects the living contemporary American literature, the publication of conditions of the contradictions of contemporary Rabbit Tetralogy is considered as a landmark event, and Americans: endless pursuit of free life or independent self Updike’s character "Rabbit" Harry, one of the "most and the embarrassment and helplessness of it; the confusing literary figures in traditional American customary life and hedonism under the traditional values, literature", has become a classic figure in contemporary the intense collision of self-indulgent lifestyles inspired by American literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Addition to Summer Letter
    May 2020 Dear Student, You are enrolled in Advanced Placement English Literature and Composition for the coming school year. Bowling Green High School has offered this course since 1983. I thought that I would tell you a little bit about the course and what will be expected of you. Please share this letter with your parents or guardians. A.P. Literature and Composition is a year-long class that is taught on a college freshman level. This means that we will read college level texts—often from college anthologies—and we will deal with other materials generally taught in college. You should be advised that some of these texts are sophisticated and contain mature themes and/or advanced levels of difficulty. In this class we will concentrate on refining reading, writing, and critical analysis skills, as well as personal reactions to literature. A.P. Literature is not a survey course or a history of literature course so instead of studying English and world literature chronologically, we will be studying a mix of classic and contemporary pieces of fiction from all eras and from diverse cultures. This gives us an opportunity to develop more than a superficial understanding of literary works and their ideas. Writing is at the heart of this A.P. course, so you will write often in journals, in both personal and researched essays, and in creative responses. You will need to revise your writing. I have found that even good students—like you—need to refine, mature, and improve their writing skills. You will have to work diligently at revising major essays.
    [Show full text]
  • Catherine Morley
    49th Parallel, Vol. 23 (Summer 2009) Hobbs ISSN: 1753-5794 (online) Catherine Morley. The Quest for Epic in Contemporary American Fiction: John Updike, Philip Roth and Don DeLillo. New York: Routledge, 2009. 226pp. Alex Hobbs* Anglia Ruskin University In this slim volume (part of the excellent Routledge Transnational Perspectives on American Literature series, edited by Susan Castillo), Catherine Morley tackles three of the most critically acclaimed and most widely discussed American authors of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Morley concentrates on John Updike’s Rabbit Angstrom series, Philip Roth’s American Pastoral trilogy and Don DeLillo’s Underworld, all of which have been praised as contenders for the title of the “Great American Novel.” While these writers have been previously compared in other ways, Morley brings them together in a genre study; she considers the influence of the epic on their work, and their place in the epic tradition. In line with the overarching theme of the series, Morley suggests that these authors are not necessarily, or perhaps not even, the quintessentially American writers that they have been purported to be. Rather, she shows that their influences are equally European, and that their message concerning America is not a unifying one. In short, Morley argues that these are authors writing from a transnational heritage and to a fragmented America. Taking issue with the term “Great American Novel,” she suggests that these novels be considered in the tradition of the prose epic or epic novel, and isolates James Joyce, and in particular his novel Ulysses, as a unifying influence for all three authors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regulating Daughter in John Updike's Rabbit Novels
    Technological University Dublin ARROW@TU Dublin Articles Languages 2014-10 The Regulating Daughter in John Updike's Rabbit Novels Sue Norton Technological University Dublin, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/aaschlanart Part of the Literature in English, North America Commons Recommended Citation Norton, S. : The Regulating Daughter in John Updike's Rabbit Novels, The John Updike Review, University of Cincinnati, Vol. 3, No. 1, Spring 2014. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Languages at ARROW@TU Dublin. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of ARROW@TU Dublin. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License The Regulating Daughter in John Updike’s Rabbit Novels suE norton To demonstrate that the patriarchal nuclear family is not a naturally occurring phenomenon, scholars of various disciplines have endeavored to prove that gen- der inequality, upon which the patriarchal nuclear form depends, did not always exist. They have argued that it arose in response to certain conditions generated by the first agricultural revolution, and that matrilineal and matriarchal societies existed in prehistory, and, indeed, continue to exist in certain “primitive” cultures. In other words, they have tried to do what Friedrich Engels did in a book which, Michèle Barrett writes, “tackles the question of the origin of human society.” As Barrett points out: “Although we all know that such attempts are doomed because unprovable, they remain of abiding interest” (29–30).
    [Show full text]
  • Researched Literary Analysis Paper
    Researched Literary Analysis Paper Assignment Guide for ENGL 1302 LSC-University Park Library Assignment Contact a Librarian Write a researched analysis paper, developing a narrowly-defined argumentative thesis that considers the relationship between theme and [email protected] symbol in one of the provided literary works. The essay should address 281-401-5390 the following: Articulate the central theme of the story and develop a strong thesis statement about that theme. Identify the symbols in the story and discuss how they support and establish the theme. Explain how the symbols help to communicate the story’s meaning, citing specific moments in the text. LSC-UP Library Homepage What does the story suggest about the relationship between theme and symbol in fiction? Contact Your Instructor Length: 5-7 (double-spaced) pages, including a Works Cited page. Use at least 3 outside critical sources from the LSC Research Databases. Professor Izaguirre Use MLA format. [email protected] Getting Started Select one literary work from the following options: “A Rose for Emily” by William Faulkner | “Greasy Lake” by T.C. Boyle | “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman | “The Rocking Horse Winner” by D.H. Lawrence | “Everyday Use” by Alice Walker | “A & P” by John Updike | “Two Kinds” by Amy Tan | Trifles by Susan Glaspell | A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen | Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller Theme – Start by making a list of all the work’s possible themes. “the central or Determine which points seem most important; then formulate a single sentence in underlying meaning of which you combine them.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Harold Bloom (Ed.), Saul Bellow: Modern Critical Views (New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1986), P
    Notes 1. Harold Bloom (ed.), Saul Bellow: Modern Critical Views (New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1986), p. 1. 2. Saul Bellow (ed.), Great Jewish Short Stories (New York: Dell Publishing, 1963), p. 13. 3. Quoted in Stanley Kunitz (ed.) Twentieth Century Authors, First Supple­ ment (New York: H.W. Wilson Company, 1955), p. 72. 4. Jo Brans, 'Common Needs, Common Preoccupations', in Stanley Trachtenberg (ed.) Critical Essays on Saul Bellow (Boston: G.K. Hall & Co., 1979), p. 67. 5. Saul Bellow, in his foreword to Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind (New York: Simon and Schuster Inc., 1987), p.14. 6. Alfred Kazin, 'My Friend Saul Bellow', Atlantic Monthly, Jan. 1965, p.51. 7. Mark Harris, Saul Bellow: Drumlin Woodchuck (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1980), p. 182. 8. Joyce Illig, 'An Interview with Saul Bellow', Publishers Weekly, 22 Oct. 1973, p. 77. 9. Saul Bellow, 'The Thinking Man's Waste Land', Saturday Review, 3 April 1965, p. 20. 10. Saul Bellow, The Last Analysis (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1966), p. vii. 11. Quoted in Mary Bruccoli (ed.), Dictionary of Literary Biography, Documentary Series, vol. 3 (Detroit: Gale Research Co., 1983), p. 62. 12. Joseph Epstein, 'A Talk with Saul Bellow', New York Times Book Review, 5 Dec. 1976, p. 3. 13. Noam Chomsky, 'Bellow's Israel', New York Arts Journal, Spring 1977, pp.29-32. 14. Saul Bellow, 'I Haven't Hung up My Gloves Yet', Toronto Star, 11 March 1990, p. D6. 15. Saul Bellow, Foreword to Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind, p.
    [Show full text]
  • OSAA Boys Track & Field Championships
    OSAA Boys Track & Field Championships 4A Individual State Champions Through 2006 100-METER DASH 1992 Seth Wetzel, Jesuit ............................................ 1:53.20 1978 Byron Howell, Central Catholic................................. 10.5 1993 Jon Ryan, Crook County ..................................... 1:52.44 300-METER INTERMEDIATE HURDLES 1979 Byron Howell, Central Catholic............................... 10.67 1994 Jon Ryan, Crook County ..................................... 1:54.93 1978 Rourke Lowe, Aloha .............................................. 38.01 1980 Byron Howell, Central Catholic............................... 10.64 1995 Bryan Berryhill, Crater ....................................... 1:53.95 1979 Ken Scott, Aloha .................................................. 36.10 1981 Kevin Vixie, South Eugene .................................... 10.89 1996 Bryan Berryhill, Crater ....................................... 1:56.03 1980 Jerry Abdie, Sunset ................................................ 37.7 1982 Kevin Vixie, South Eugene .................................... 10.64 1997 Rob Vermillion, Glencoe ..................................... 1:55.49 1981 Romund Howard, Madison ....................................... 37.3 1983 John Frazier, Jefferson ........................................ 10.80w 1998 Tim Meador, South Medford ............................... 1:55.21 1982 John Elston, Lebanon ............................................ 39.02 1984 Gus Envela, McKay............................................. 10.55w 1999
    [Show full text]
  • Board Certified Fellows
    AMERICAN BOARD OF MEDICOLEGAL DEATH INVESTIGATORS Certificant Directory As of September 30, 2021 BOARD CERTIFIED FELLOWS Addison, Krysten Leigh (Inactive) BC2286 Allmon, James L. BC855 Travis County Medical Examiner's Office Sangamon County Coroner's Office 1213 Sabine Street 200 South 9th, Room 203 PO Box 1748 Springfield, IL 62701 Austin, TX 78767 Amini, Navid BC2281 Appleberry, Sherronda BC1721 Olmsted Medical Examiner's Office Adams and Broomfield County Office of the Coroner 200 1st Street Southwest 330 North 19th Avenue Rochester, MN 55905 Brighton, CO 80601 Applegate, MD, David T. BC1829 Archer, Meredith D. BC1036 Union County Coroner's Office Mohave County Medical Examiner 128 South Main Street 1145 Aviation Drive Unit A Marysville, OH 43040 Lake Havasu, AZ 86404 Bailey, Ted E. (Inactive) BC229 Bailey, Sanisha Renee BC1754 Gwinnett County Medical Examiner's Office Virginia Office of the Chief Medical Examiner 320 Hurricane Shoals Road, NE Central District Lawrenceville, GA 30046 400 East Jackson Street Richmond, VA 23219 Balacki, Alexander J BC1513 Banks, Elsie-Kay BC3039 Montgomery County Coroner's Office Maine Office of the Chief Medical Examiner 1430 Dekalb Street 30 Hospital Street PO Box 311 Augusta, ME 04333 Norristown, PA 19404 Bautista, Ian BC2185 Bayer, Lindsey A. BC875 New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner District 5 and 24 Medical Examiner Office 421 East 26th Street 809 Pine Street New York, NY 10016 Leesburg, FL 34756 Beck, Shari L BC327 Beckham, Phinon Phillips BC2305 Sedgwick Co Reg. Forensic Science Center Virginia Office of the Chief Medical Examiner 1109 N. Minneapolis Northern District Wichita, KS 67214 10850 Pyramid Place, Suite 121 Manassas, VA 20110 Bednar Keefe, Gale M.
    [Show full text]
  • AP® English Literature and Composition Close Reading of Contemporary Literature
    PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AP® English Literature and Composition Close Reading of Contemporary Literature Curriculum Module About the College Board The College Board is a mission-driven not-for-profit organization that connects students to college success and opportunity. Founded in 1900, the College Board was created to expand access to higher education. Today, the membership association is made up of more than 5,900 of the world’s leading educational institutions and is dedicated to promoting excellence and equity in education. Each year, the College Board helps more than seven million students prepare for a successful transition to college through programs and services in college readiness and college success — including the SAT® and the Advanced Placement Program®. The organization also serves the education community through research and advocacy on behalf of students, educators and schools. For further information, visit www.collegeboard.org. Pages 5–6: Robert Penn Warren, “Evening Hawk,” and excerpts from “Kentucky Mountain Farm” and “The Leaf” from The Collected Poems of Robert Penn Warren, edited by John Burt. Copyright © 1985 by Robert Penn Warren. Reprinted with the permission of William Morris Agency, Inc., on behalf of the estate of Robert Penn Warren. Page 33: John Updike, “The Great Scarf of Birds” from Collected Poems 1953–1993. Copyright © 1993 by John Updike. Used by permission of Alfred A. Knopf, a division of Random House, Inc. Pages 35–37: Joyce Carol Oates, “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?” from The Wheel of Love and Other Stories (New York: Vanguard, 1970). Copyright © 1970 by Joyce Carol Oates. Reprinted by permission of John Hawkins & Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]