Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel Release Notes for Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel Release 5 Update 2
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 7.1 Release Notes
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 7.1 Release Notes Release Notes for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Red Hat Customer Content Services Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 7.1 Release Notes Release Notes for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Red Hat Customer Content Services Legal Notice Copyright © 2015 Red Hat, Inc. This document is licensed by Red Hat under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. If you distribute this document, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat, Inc. and provide a link to the original. If the document is modified, all Red Hat trademarks must be removed. Red Hat, as the licensor of this document, waives the right to enforce, and agrees not to assert, Section 4d of CC-BY-SA to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. Red Hat, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, the Shadowman logo, JBoss, MetaMatrix, Fedora, the Infinity Logo, and RHCE are trademarks of Red Hat, Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux ® is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries. Java ® is a registered trademark of Oracle and/or its affiliates. XFS ® is a trademark of Silicon Graphics International Corp. or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries. MySQL ® is a registered trademark of MySQL AB in the United States, the European Union and other countries. Node.js ® is an official trademark of Joyent. Red Hat Software Collections is not formally related to or endorsed by the official Joyent Node.js open source or commercial project. -
Administració De Sistemes GNU Linux Mòdul4 Administració
Administració local Josep Jorba Esteve PID_00238577 GNUFDL • PID_00238577 Administració local Es garanteix el permís per a copiar, distribuir i modificar aquest document segons els termes de la GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 o qualsevol altra de posterior publicada per la Free Software Foundation, sense seccions invariants ni textos de la oberta anterior o posterior. Podeu consultar els termes de la llicència a http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html. GNUFDL • PID_00238577 Administració local Índex Introducció.................................................................................................. 5 1. Eines bàsiques per a l'administrador........................................... 7 1.1. Eines gràfiques i línies de comandes .......................................... 8 1.2. Documents d'estàndards ............................................................. 10 1.3. Documentació del sistema en línia ............................................ 13 1.4. Eines de gestió de paquets .......................................................... 15 1.4.1. Paquets TGZ ................................................................... 16 1.4.2. Fedora/Red Hat: paquets RPM ....................................... 19 1.4.3. Debian: paquets DEB ..................................................... 24 1.4.4. Nous formats d'empaquetat: Snap i Flatpak .................. 28 1.5. Eines genèriques d'administració ................................................ 36 1.6. Altres eines ................................................................................. -
Storage Administration Guide Storage Administration Guide SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP4
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP4 Storage Administration Guide Storage Administration Guide SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP4 Provides information about how to manage storage devices on a SUSE Linux Enterprise Server. Publication Date: September 24, 2021 SUSE LLC 1800 South Novell Place Provo, UT 84606 USA https://documentation.suse.com Copyright © 2006– 2021 SUSE LLC and contributors. All rights reserved. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or (at your option) version 1.3; with the Invariant Section being this copyright notice and license. A copy of the license version 1.2 is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”. For SUSE trademarks, see https://www.suse.com/company/legal/ . All other third-party trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Trademark symbols (®, ™ etc.) denote trademarks of SUSE and its aliates. Asterisks (*) denote third-party trademarks. All information found in this book has been compiled with utmost attention to detail. However, this does not guarantee complete accuracy. Neither SUSE LLC, its aliates, the authors nor the translators shall be held liable for possible errors or the consequences thereof. Contents About This Guide xii 1 Available Documentation xii 2 Giving Feedback xiv 3 Documentation Conventions xiv 4 Product Life Cycle and Support xvi Support Statement for SUSE Linux Enterprise Server xvii • Technology Previews xviii I FILE SYSTEMS AND MOUNTING 1 1 Overview -
Oracle® Linux Administrator's Solutions Guide for Release 6
Oracle® Linux Administrator's Solutions Guide for Release 6 E37355-64 August 2017 Oracle Legal Notices Copyright © 2012, 2017, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This software and related documentation are provided under a license agreement containing restrictions on use and disclosure and are protected by intellectual property laws. Except as expressly permitted in your license agreement or allowed by law, you may not use, copy, reproduce, translate, broadcast, modify, license, transmit, distribute, exhibit, perform, publish, or display any part, in any form, or by any means. Reverse engineering, disassembly, or decompilation of this software, unless required by law for interoperability, is prohibited. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice and is not warranted to be error-free. If you find any errors, please report them to us in writing. If this is software or related documentation that is delivered to the U.S. Government or anyone licensing it on behalf of the U.S. Government, then the following notice is applicable: U.S. GOVERNMENT END USERS: Oracle programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, delivered to U.S. Government end users are "commercial computer software" pursuant to the applicable Federal Acquisition Regulation and agency-specific supplemental regulations. As such, use, duplication, disclosure, modification, and adaptation of the programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, shall be subject to license terms and license restrictions applicable to the programs. No other rights are granted to the U.S. -
Customizable Multimedia Devices in Virtual Environments
Customizable Multimedia Devices in Virtual Environments Ankur Pai, Balasubramanian Seshasayee, Himanshu Raj and Karsten Schwan Center for Experimental Research in Computer Systems Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332–0250 fpaiankur, bala, rhim, [email protected] Abstract—The separation of logical from physical devices maintain a consistent view of physical devices by presenting provided by modern virtualization techniques can be used to only a common minimal set of device features is too limiting enhance device functionality, including by emulating non-native and worse, it cannot account for changes in the environmental device functions in software. Such logically extended devices are particularly promising in the mobile domain, for embedded conditions or contexts in which devices are used. machines, handhelds, or phones. Challenges arise, however, from We argue that device sharing and interoperation in mobile the highly heterogeneous nature of portables and the devices with systems requires models and interfaces with which virtual- which they can interact. This suggests that device extensions ization infrastructures can dynamically change device func- should be dynamic, varied at runtime to adjust to new user needs and/or changes in environmental conditions. This paper tionality to account for runtime changes in device use, con- presents a model for runtime device extension and for then using ditions, and contexts. This paper presents such a model. It such extended devices. The model provides uniform interfaces to implements the safe, runtime extension of device functionality, native and extended devices, permits the safe runtime extension by enabling the virtualization layer, guest operating systems, of device functionality, and can be shown to operate across both or applications to safely specify and deploy custom code that stationary and mobile platforms, and arbitrary operating systems and applications. -
Memory Management and Garbage Collection
Overview Memory Management Stack: Data on stack (local variables on activation records) have lifetime that coincides with the life of a procedure call. Memory for stack data is allocated on entry to procedures ::: ::: and de-allocated on return. Heap: Data on heap have lifetimes that may differ from the life of a procedure call. Memory for heap data is allocated on demand (e.g. malloc, new, etc.) ::: ::: and released Manually: e.g. using free Automatically: e.g. using a garbage collector Compilers Memory Management CSE 304/504 1 / 16 Overview Memory Allocation Heap memory is divided into free and used. Free memory is kept in a data structure, usually a free list. When a new chunk of memory is needed, a chunk from the free list is returned (after marking it as used). When a chunk of memory is freed, it is added to the free list (after marking it as free) Compilers Memory Management CSE 304/504 2 / 16 Overview Fragmentation Free space is said to be fragmented when free chunks are not contiguous. Fragmentation is reduced by: Maintaining different-sized free lists (e.g. free 8-byte cells, free 16-byte cells etc.) and allocating out of the appropriate list. If a small chunk is not available (e.g. no free 8-byte cells), grab a larger chunk (say, a 32-byte chunk), subdivide it (into 4 smaller chunks) and allocate. When a small chunk is freed, check if it can be merged with adjacent areas to make a larger chunk. Compilers Memory Management CSE 304/504 3 / 16 Overview Manual Memory Management Programmer has full control over memory ::: with the responsibility to manage it well Premature free's lead to dangling references Overly conservative free's lead to memory leaks With manual free's it is virtually impossible to ensure that a program is correct and secure. -
Adaptive Android Kernel Live Patching
Adaptive Android Kernel Live Patching Yue Chen Yulong Zhang Zhi Wang Liangzhao Xia Florida State University Baidu X-Lab Florida State University Baidu X-Lab Chenfu Bao Tao Wei Baidu X-Lab Baidu X-Lab Abstract apps contain sensitive personal data, such as bank ac- counts, mobile payments, private messages, and social Android kernel vulnerabilities pose a serious threat to network data. Even TrustZone, widely used as the se- user security and privacy. They allow attackers to take cure keystore and digital rights management in Android, full control over victim devices, install malicious and un- is under serious threat since the compromised kernel en- wanted apps, and maintain persistent control. Unfortu- ables the attacker to inject malicious payloads into Trust- nately, most Android devices are never timely updated Zone [42, 43]. Therefore, Android kernel vulnerabilities to protect their users from kernel exploits. Recent An- pose a serious threat to user privacy and security. droid malware even has built-in kernel exploits to take Tremendous efforts have been put into finding (and ex- advantage of this large window of vulnerability. An ef- ploiting) Android kernel vulnerabilities by both white- fective solution to this problem must be adaptable to lots hat and black-hat researchers, as evidenced by the sig- of (out-of-date) devices, quickly deployable, and secure nificant increase of kernel vulnerabilities disclosed in from misuse. However, the fragmented Android ecosys- Android Security Bulletin [3] in recent years. In ad- tem makes this a complex and challenging task. dition, many kernel vulnerabilities/exploits are publicly To address that, we systematically studied 1;139 An- available but never reported to Google or the vendors, droid kernels and all the recent critical Android ker- let alone patched (e.g., exploits in Android rooting nel vulnerabilities. -
Taxonomy of Linux Kernel Vulnerability Solutions
Taxonomy of Linux Kernel Vulnerability Solutions Serguei A. Mokhov Marc-Andre´ Laverdiere` Djamel Benredjem Computer Security Laboratory Computer Security Laboratory Computer Security Laboratory Concordia Institute for Concordia Institute for Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering Information Systems Engineering Information Systems Engineering Concordia University, Concordia University, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Montreal, Quebec, Canada Montreal, Quebec, Canada Email: [email protected] Email: ma [email protected] Email: d [email protected] Abstract—This paper presents the results of a case study on C programs in general, as well as statistics on their relative software vulnerability solutions in the Linux kernel. Our major importance. We also introduce a new methodology to track contribution is the introduction of a classification of methods used the patch solving a security issue based only on the contents to solve vulnerabilities. Our research shows that precondition validation, error handling, and redesign are the most used of the security advisory. methods in solving vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel. This The paper is organized as follows: we examine previous contribution is accompanied with statistics on the occurrence work that was done regarding Linux and C security in of the different types of vulnerabilities and their solutions that Section II, followed by a description of the methodology we observed during our case study, combined with example used in order to obtain the solutions to the vulnerabilities in source code patches. We also combine our findings with existing programming guidelines to create the first security-oriented Section III. Afterwards, in Section IV, we show our results, coding guidelines for the Linux kernel. -
USB Composite Gadget Using CONFIG-FS on Dra7xx Devices
Application Report SPRACB5–September 2017 USB Composite Gadget Using CONFIG-FS on DRA7xx Devices RaviB ABSTRACT This application note explains how to create a USB composite gadget, network control model (NCM) and abstract control model (ACM) from the user space using Linux® CONFIG-FS on the DRA7xx platform. Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 2 2 USB Composite Gadget Using CONFIG-FS ............................................................................. 3 3 Creating Composite Gadget From User Space.......................................................................... 4 4 References ................................................................................................................... 8 List of Figures 1 Block Diagram of USB Composite Gadget............................................................................... 3 2 Selection of CONFIGFS Through menuconfig........................................................................... 4 3 Select USB Configuration Through menuconfig......................................................................... 4 4 Composite Gadget Configuration Items as Files and Directories ..................................................... 5 5 VID, PID, and Manufacturer String Configuration ....................................................................... 6 6 Kernel Logs Show Enumeration of USB Composite Gadget by Host ................................................ 6 7 Ping -
Memory Management with Explicit Regions by David Edward Gay
Memory Management with Explicit Regions by David Edward Gay Engineering Diploma (Ecole Polytechnique F´ed´erale de Lausanne, Switzerland) 1992 M.S. (University of California, Berkeley) 1997 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA at BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor Alex Aiken, Chair Professor Susan L. Graham Professor Gregory L. Fenves Fall 2001 The dissertation of David Edward Gay is approved: Chair Date Date Date University of California at Berkeley Fall 2001 Memory Management with Explicit Regions Copyright 2001 by David Edward Gay 1 Abstract Memory Management with Explicit Regions by David Edward Gay Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science University of California at Berkeley Professor Alex Aiken, Chair Region-based memory management systems structure memory by grouping objects in regions under program control. Memory is reclaimed by deleting regions, freeing all objects stored therein. Our compiler for C with regions, RC, prevents unsafe region deletions by keeping a count of references to each region. RC's regions have advantages over explicit allocation and deallocation (safety) and traditional garbage collection (better control over memory), and its performance is competitive with both|from 6% slower to 55% faster on a collection of realistic benchmarks. Experience with these benchmarks suggests that modifying many existing programs to use regions is not difficult. An important innovation in RC is the use of type annotations that make the structure of a program's regions more explicit. These annotations also help reduce the overhead of reference counting from a maximum of 25% to a maximum of 12.6% on our benchmarks. -
Protecting Your Linux Systems with Oracle Ksplice
Staying Ahead of Cyberthreats: Protecting Your Linux Systems with Oracle Ksplice The Advantages Of Zero-Downtime Patching April 23, 2020 Copyright © 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates Public TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 Why Patching Matters 2 About Oracle Ksplice 3 Other Benefits 3 Conclusion 4 Learn More 4 1 WHITE PAPER | Staying Ahead of Cyberthreats: Protecting Your Linux Systems Copyright © 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates |Public INTRODUCTION IT systems require regular patching for security, performance, and compliance reasons. For Linux operating system (OS) kernel updates, which include “Availability requirements important new security enhancements and bug fixes, releases happen about 1 are on the rise for once per month. These updates help keep systems current with the latest organizations undergoing innovations. However, manually patching systems has many inherent digital transformations. challenges and difficulties which tends to delay their timely application. For this Downtimes are costly, reason, zero-downtime patching solutions for Linux, like Oracle Ksplice, are with unplanned becoming essential tools. In this paper, Oracle Ksplice’s capabilities and many infrastructure downtimes advantages are explained. costing $100,000 per hour on an average. With Why Patching Matters the possibility of every organization being a Inadequate patch management can leave loopholes in the IT infrastructure leading to target for cyberattacks various security and performance issues. Ideally, patches should be applied shortly after and attackers moving very release to ensure the latest system protections. Patching typically requires downtime quickly to exploit system which, depending on operations, can require weeks or months of advanced planning. vulnerabilities, IDC Most Linux patching also traditionally happens at the disk level for file systems, which has recommends several disadvantages. -
Speeding up Linux Disk Encryption Ignat Korchagin @Ignatkn $ Whoami
Speeding Up Linux Disk Encryption Ignat Korchagin @ignatkn $ whoami ● Performance and security at Cloudflare ● Passionate about security and crypto ● Enjoy low level programming @ignatkn Encrypting data at rest The storage stack applications @ignatkn The storage stack applications filesystems @ignatkn The storage stack applications filesystems block subsystem @ignatkn The storage stack applications filesystems block subsystem storage hardware @ignatkn Encryption at rest layers applications filesystems block subsystem SED, OPAL storage hardware @ignatkn Encryption at rest layers applications filesystems LUKS/dm-crypt, BitLocker, FileVault block subsystem SED, OPAL storage hardware @ignatkn Encryption at rest layers applications ecryptfs, ext4 encryption or fscrypt filesystems LUKS/dm-crypt, BitLocker, FileVault block subsystem SED, OPAL storage hardware @ignatkn Encryption at rest layers DBMS, PGP, OpenSSL, Themis applications ecryptfs, ext4 encryption or fscrypt filesystems LUKS/dm-crypt, BitLocker, FileVault block subsystem SED, OPAL storage hardware @ignatkn Storage hardware encryption Pros: ● it’s there ● little configuration needed ● fully transparent to applications ● usually faster than other layers @ignatkn Storage hardware encryption Pros: ● it’s there ● little configuration needed ● fully transparent to applications ● usually faster than other layers Cons: ● no visibility into the implementation ● no auditability ● sometimes poor security https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4516071/windows-10-update-kb4516071 @ignatkn Block