DOCSLIB.ORG

Section9 5-06

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section9 5-06 References for Paxton Creek 9 Rivers Conservation Plan ABT. September, 2003. Adopt-A- Buffer Toolkit. Brown, Lester R. and E. C. Wolfe. 1984. Soil Delaware Riverkeeper Network: Washington Erosion: Quiet Crisis in the World Economy. Paper Crossing, PA Number 60. Worldwatch Institute: Washington, DC Adamus, Paul R., ARA, Inc., Ellis J. Clairain, Jr., Burt, W.H. and R.P. Grossenheider. 1976 A Field R. Daniel Smith, and Richard E. Young. October, Guide to the Mammals. The Peterson Field Guide 1987. Wetland Evaluation Review Technique. Series #5. (3rd ed.) Houghton Mifflin Company: Volume II: Methodology. Department of the Army, Boston. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers: Washington, DC Buskirk, E. Drannon, Jr. February, 2002. Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay, and Center for Monitoring Protocol Paxton Creek Rangers of the Watershed Protection. October, 2003. Pennsylvania Senior Environment Corps. Paxton Recommended Model Development Principles for Creek Watershed and Education Association: Lower Paxton Township and Susquehanna Harrisburg, PA Township: Paxton Creek Watershed. A Cappiella, K. and K. Brown. 2003. Land Use and Consensus of the Local Site Planning Roundtable. Impervious Cover in the Chesapeake Bay. Center Funded by Growing Greener Program, for Watershed Protection: Ellicott City, MD Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection: Harrisburg, PA Caraco, Deb. March, 2002. The Watershed Treatment Model. Version 3.1 Center for Watershed Appalachian Audubon Society, Bird List for Protection: Ellicott City, MD Dauphin County, January 1993-April 2003 Carswell, Louis D., Jerald R. Hollowell, and Lucian Arndt, Randall, Michael G. Clarke, Kelleann B. Platt. 1968. Geology and Hydrology of the Foster, Ann Hutchinson, and Tim Johnson. 2001. Martinsburg Formation in Dauphin County, Growing Greener Ordinance Language. CD-ROM. Pennsylvania. Ground Water Report W 24. The Natural Lands Trust. Distributed by Island Pennsylvania Geological Survey, Fourth Series: Press: Covelo, CA Harrisburg, PA Audubon Pennsylvania. 2000. Pennsylvania's Center for Watershed Protection. 1998. Rapid 67Pa Important Bird Area Program. Brochure. Audubon xt Cr Watershed Planning Handbook: Ellicott City, MD o Pennsylvania: Harrisburg n e k Center for Watershed Protection. 2002. The Do-It- e t Barbour, Michael T., Jeroen Gerritsen, Blaine D. Wa Yourself Watershed Planning Kit. Ellicott City, MD Snyder, and James N. Stribling. 1999, July. Second er Edition. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Center for Watershed Protection. December, 2003. shed a Wadeable Streams and Rivers. Periphyton, Benthic n Paxton Creek Baseline and Stormwater Retrofit d E at on Macroinvertebrates and Fish. Second Edition. EPA Assessment. Report for Paxton Creek Watershed du 841-B-99-002. Office of Water, U. S. and Education Association funded by Canaan c i Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC Valley Institute: Ellicott City, MD A o s s c Barton, Michael. 1995. Life by the Moving Road. i i a Center for Watershed Protection. November, 2004. t American Historical Press: Sun Valley, CA on Plan for Paxton Creek North Subwatershed. Report Barton, Michael. 1998. An Illustrated History of for Paxton Creek Watershed and Education Greater Harrisburg. American Historical Press: Sun Association funded by Canaan Valley Institute: Valley, CA Ellicott City, MD Beatley, Timothy. 2000. Green Urbanism Learning City of Harrisburg, PA. 1991. Economic Resource from European Cities. Island Press: Covelo, CA Profile. City of Harrisburg: Harrisburg, PA Benfield, F. Kaid, Jutka Terris, and Nancy Vorsanger. 2001. Solving Sprawl. Natural Conant, Francis et. Al, Editors. 1983. Resource Resources Defense Council. Distributed by Island Inventory & Baseline Study Merthods for Press: Covelo, CA Developing Countries. AAAS Publication 83-3. American Association for the Advancement of Science: Washington, DC References for Paxton Creek Rivers Conservation Plan CVI and DEP. 2003. Watershed Restoration Embich, Thomas 2004.Groundwater, Recreation, Template. Canaan Valley Institute and Pennsylvania and Wildlife Compilation Data. Personal Department of Environmental Protection. Davis: WV Communication. Unpublished. Dauphin County Historical Society. 1985. Historical Environmental Management Center. 1997. Atlas of 1875. Reprint of Combination Atlas Map by Community Trails Handbook. Brandywine Everts and Stewart, Philadelphia. County of Dauphin: Conservancy: Chadds Ford, PA. Harrisburg, PA Ettinger, William. 1986. Historical and Current Dauphin County Parks & Recreation Wildlife Distribution of American Lotus in Wildwood Biologists, 2003. Personal Communication to Embich Lake. Unpublished Report. Bureau of Forestry, of sightings in the Paxton Creek and Wildwood Lake Pennsylvania Department of Environmental areas. Resources: Harrisburg, PA DCCD. 2003. Macroinvertebrate collection data on Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working sites in Paxton Creek. Andrew McAllister for Group. October, 1998. Stream Corridor Dauphin County Conservation District, Dauphin, PA. Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices. Personal Communication. United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC Deck, Steve. June, 2005. Stormwater modeling data for Act 167 plan conveyed with concurrence of Fike, Jean. 1999. Terrestrial and Palustrine Plant Dauphin County Conservation District. Personal Communities of Pennsylvania. PA Department of Communication. Conservation and Natural Resources, The Nature Conservancy and Western Pennsylvania Dement, Polly. 1998. River Talk! River Network: Conservancy: Harrisburg, PA Portland, OR Finley, James. June, 2004. Pennsylvania State DEP. 2004. Search of stream files at South Central University. Personal Communication Region office of the Department of Environmental Protection by PCWEA. Fleeger, Gary M. 1999. The Geology of 68Pa Pennsylvania's Groundwater. Educational Series x to Devlin, Pat. February, 2004. Talking Points on Paxton n 3. Pennsylvania Geological Survey: Cree a Creek Roundtable Recommendations, Camp Hill, PA. Harrisburg, PA k k Personal Communication. W e h French, Janie. November, 2004. Information t rs Dollard, Nancy. September, 2002. Kinter Note. About Research on a Flood Plain Restoration e a d d Personal communication. Project (Unpublished). Personal communication n d d E Doyle, William. 2004. Historic Sites in Lower Paxton d s u Gleason, William (Rocky). May, 2005. Vegetation c at Township. Draft Report of Lower Paxton Historical i o Survey Site Records Unpublished. The Nature n n Society. Personal communication. As Conservancy. Personal communication oc Draude, Timothy. October, 2003. Botanical Survey of i i at on Paxton Creek Watershed Report for PCWEA: Gyekis, Joe. July 2002. “Riparian Bird Lancaster, PA . Unpublished. Community Assessment for the Upper Penns Creek Watershed: An Indicator of Dunne, T. and Luna B. Leopold. 1978. Water in Landscape Level Conservation Priorities.” Environmental Planning. W. H. Freeman: San Schreyer Honors College, Pennsylvania State Francisco, CA University, University Park, PA Unpublished. EASI. October 1998. PA Water Quality Monitoring Field Manual. Revision of May 2001. Environmental Embich, T.R. 2003. Field notes and personal Alliance for Senior Involvement and Schuykill communications about aquatic invertebrate Center for Environmental Education. PA Senior studies with Harrisburg Area Community College Environment Corps: Harrisburg.. staff and Wildwood Lake Sanctuary wildlife biologists, Dauphin Co. Parks & Recreation EMAP. 2000, August. Mid-Atlantic Highlands Department. Unpublished Streams Assessment. EPA/903/R-00/015. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program, Office of Research and Development, Corvalis, OR and Region III, Philadelphia, PA. U.S Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC References for Paxton Creek Rivers Conservation Plan Hanssen, Nell. 2003. Waterways and Wildlife. Kitchell, Anne C. and Thomas R. Schueler. March, Penns Valley Conservation Association: 2004. Unified Stream Assessment A User's Manual. Aaronsburg, PA Version 2.0. Urban Subwatershed Restoration Manual No. 10. Center for Watershed Protection: Harrelson, Cheryl C, C. L. Rawlins, and John P. Ellicott City, MD Potyondy. April, 1994. General Technical Report RM-245. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Kober, Amy. April 13, 2005, “Susquehanna River Experiment Station, Forest Service, United States Most Endangered, #1 on Annual List Released Department of Agriculture: Fort Collins, CO Today,” Press Release by American Rivers: Washington, DC HATS. 2004. HATS 2003 Annual Report. Kunkle, Merril W., Garland Lipscomb, and Richard Harrisburg Area Transportation Study. Tri-County Kinnard. 1972. Soil Survey Dauphin County, Regional Planning Commission: Harrisburg, PA Pennsylvania. Soil Conservation Service, US HRG. January 17, 1996. Paxton Creek Stormwater Department of Agriculture, Penn State University, Quality Management Study. Discharge and water and Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. US Quality Modeling for Dauphin County Government Printing Office: Washington, DC Conservation District and Pennsylvania Department Lancaster, R. A., Editor. 1990. Recreation, Park and of Environmental Protection. Herbert, Rowland and Open Space Guidelines. National Recreation and Grubic, Inc.: Harrisburg, PA Park Association: Ashburn, VA Hrobuchak, David and Mary Golab. 2005. DEP Lockerman, Sandy. 2003. Bird Checklist Wildwood landfill notes. Personal communications. Lake Sanctuary. Third Edition. Brochure. Dauphin County Parks and Recreation: Harrisburg, PA
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • Middletown Borough
    369 East Park Drive Harrisburg, PA 17111 (717) 564-1121 www.hrg-inc.com July 2017 CHESAPEAKE BAY POLLUTANT REDUCTION PLAN FOR MIDDLETOWN BOROUGH PREPARED FOR: MIDDLETOWN BOROUGH DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA HRG Project No. R000516.0459 ©Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc., 2017 CHESAPEAKE BAY POLLUTION REDUCTION PLAN FOR MIDDLETOWN BOROUGH, DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Introduction Section A – Public Participation Section B – Mapping Section C – Pollutants of Concern Section D – Determine Existing Loading for Pollutants of Concern Section E – BMPs to Achieve the Required Pollutant Load Reductions Section F – Identify Funding Mechanism Section G – BMP Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Appendices Appendix A – Public Participation Documentation Appendix B – Mapping Appendix C – PADEP Municipal MS4 Requirements Tables Appendix D – Existing Pollutant Loading Calculations Appendix E – Proposed BMP Pollutant Load Reduction Calculations Chesapeake Bay Pollutant Reduction Plan Middletown Borough, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania Page 1 Introduction Middletown Borough discharges stormwater to surface waters located within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and is therefore regulated by a PAG-13 General Permit, Appendix D (nutrients and sediment in stormwater discharges to waters in the Chesapeake Bay watershed). The Borough also has watershed impairments regulated by PAG-13 General Permit, Appendix E (nutrients and/or sediment in stormwater discharges to impaired waterways). This Chesapeake Bay Pollutant Reduction Plan (CBPRP) was developed in accordance with both PAG-13 requirements and documents how the Borough intends to achieve the pollutant reduction requirements listed in the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) Municipal MS4 Requirements Table1. This document was prepared following the guidance provided in the PADEP National Pollutant Discharges Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems Pollutant Reduction Plan (PRP) Instructions2.
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna River Basin Commission 4423 N
    ASSESSMENT OF NUTRIENT SOURCES FROM MAINSTEM AND SELECTED WATERSHEDS IN THE SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan SRBC-QA048 January 2017 – December 2018 PROJECT OFFICER: ____________________________________ Kevin H. McGonigal Susquehanna River Basin Commission 4423 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788 Gary Walters Mark Brickner PA Department of Environmental Protection PA Department of Environmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building Rachel Carson State Office Building 400 Market Street 400 Market Street Harrisburg, PA 17101 Harrisburg, PA 17101 James Hargett Richard Batiuk Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program Office U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 410 Severn Avenue, Suite 109 410 Severn Avenue, Suite 112 Annapolis, MD 21403 Annapolis, MD 21403 QUALITY ASSURANCE OFFICER: James P. Shallenberger Richard Batiuk Susquehanna River Basin Commission Chesapeake Bay Program Office 4423 N. Front Street 410 Severn Avenue, Suite 109 Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788 Annapolis, MD 21403 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective and Scope ....................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Data Usage .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Are You Loving Paxton Creek to Death?
    ARE YOU LOVING PAXTON CREEK TO DEATH? Do any of these pictures look familiar? They all represent actions that can negatively affect your local streams. Read more to learn how you can protect and restore Paxton Creek! Lawns are mowed right up to the stream edge and forest buffers are cleared Sediment enters waterways through storm drain inlets and in unmanaged construction site runoff Oil and grease spills and pesticides can enter waterways in stormwater runoff Runoff from rooftops and excessive pavement increases the total volume of runoff reaching the stream Paxton Creek Watershed and Education Association Center for Watershed Protection 2004 About the Paxton Creek Watershed Do you live, work or play in the Paxton Creek Watershed? You might and not even know it. Many small headwater streams flow into the tributaries of Paxton Creek, which empties into the Susquehanna River in the City of Harrisburg, and ultimately flows to the Chesapeake Bay. All of the land area drained by Paxton Creek and its 63 miles of tributaries and headwater streams is called the Paxton Creek watershed. The Paxton Creek watershed is approximately 27 square miles, and covers portions of Dauphin County: Susquehanna Township, Lower Paxton Township, the City of Harrisburg, and Penbrook Borough. Land use in the watershed includes forested mountain headwaters, low and medium density development Forested headwater stream of surrounding Harrisburg, and highly urban development near the City portion. Paxton Creek What is a Watershed? A watershed is the area of land that drains to a particular point along a stream. A watershed boundary is defined by the highest elevations surrounding the stream.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Flow, Base-Flow, and Mean-Flow Regression Equations for Pennsylvania Streams
    Low-Flow, Base-Flow, and Mean-Flow Regression Equations for Pennsylvania Streams By Marla H. Stuckey In cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5130 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to repro- duce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Stuckey, M.H., 2006, Low-flow, base-flow, and mean-flow regression equations for Pennsylvania streams: U.S. Geo- logical Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5130, 84 p. iii Contents Abstract. 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and Scope . 2 Previous Investigations . 2 Physiography and Drainage. 2 Development of Regression Equations . 2 Streamflow-Gaging Stations . 2 Basin Characteristics . 5 Regression Techniques . 5 Low-Flow Regression Equations. 6 Base-Flow Regression Equations. 10 Mean-Flow Regression Equations. 13 Limitations of Regression Equations . 15 Summary . 15 Acknowledgments . 17 References Cited. 17 Appendixes . 19 1. Streamflow-gaging stations used in development of low-flow, base-flow, and mean-flow regression equations for Pennsylvania streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1: Introduction
    Paxton Creek North Subwatershed Restoration Plan Produced by the Center for Watershed Protection for the Paxton Creek Watershed and Education Association Funded by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and the Canaan Valley Institute December 2004 Paxton Creek North Subwatershed Restoration Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary iii Section 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The Paxton Creek Watershed 1 1.2 History of Watershed Work in Paxton Creek 2 1.3 Paxton Creek North Subwatershed Restoration Plan 3 Section 2 Paxton Creek North Subwatershed Characterization 5 2.1 Review of Existing Monitoring Data 6 Hydrology 7 Biology 8 Water Quality 12 Geomorphology 16 Section 3 Methods 18 3.1 GIS Methods 18 Subwatershed Delineation 18 Impervious Cover Analysis 18 3.2 Field Methods 18 Unified Stream Assessment (USA) 19 Unified Subwatershed and Site Reconnaissance (USSR) 21 Retrofit Inventory 24 3.3 Project Prioritization Methods 24 3.4 Stakeholder Involvement Methods 25 Educational Materials 25 Public Meetings 26 Section 4 Results of Stream and Subwatershed Assessments 28 4.1 Preliminary Results 28 4.2 Priority Restoration Projects 31 Large-Scale Projects 34 Small-Scale Projects 40 Section 5 Recommendations 49 5.1 Subwatershed Goals 49 5.2 Subwatershed Recommendations 50 Short-Term Recommendations 52 Mid-Term Recommendations 53 Long-Term Recommendations 55 5.3 Long-Term Monitoring 56 5.4 Recommendations for Future Subwatershed Assessments 58 i Paxton Creek North Subwatershed Restoration Plan References 60 Appendices Appendix A: Paxton Creek Watershed Consensus
    [Show full text]
  • 1978 Act 167 Stormwater Management May 14, 2009
    1978 Act 167 Stormwater Management May 14, 2009 PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES COVERED BY COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER GRANTS ERIE McKEAN SUSQUEHANNA WARREN BRADFORD TIOGA POTTER CRAWFORD WAYNE WYOMING FOREST CAMERON ELK SULLIVAN LACKAWANNA VENANGO LYCOMING PIKE MERCER CLINTON LUZERNE CLARION JEFFERSON MONROE COLUMBIA LAWRENCE MONTOUR CENTRE CLEARFIELD UNION BUTLER CARBON ARMSTRONG NORTHUMBERLAND NORTHAMPTON SNYDER SCHUYLKILL BEAVER INDIANA LEHIGH MIFFLIN JUNIATA ALLEGHENY CAMBRIA BLAIR BERKS PERRY DAUPHIN LEBANON BUCKS WESTMORELAND HUNTINGDON MONTGOMERY WASHINGTON CUMBERLAND BEDFORD PHILADELPHIA LANCASTER CHESTER SOMERSET FAYETTE FRANKLIN DELAWARE FULTON YORK GREENE ADAMS Legend COUNTYWIDE STATUS Not Ready 0 50 100 Being Considered Miles In Progress Action Needed Updated: 05/14/09 County Wide Status last c_name MunicsVioltrs p1 Grant p1 Grant p1 Grant p1 Scope p1 Scope p1 Scope p2 Grant p2 Grant p2 Grant p2 Plan p2 Plan p2 Plan Draft Signed Approved Draft Submitted Approved Draft Signed Approved Draft Submitted Approved Cisar Adams 34 0 3/15/2007 3/8/2007 5/8/2007 Bedford 38 10 4/3/2008 Blair 24 1 4/18/2007 Cameron 7 0 2/13/2008 Centre 35 7 4/7/2009 Clearfield 50 11 3/10/2008 3/25/2008 5/2/2008 5/9/2009 Clinton 29 4 Cumberland 33 7 5/30/2006 6/23/2006 8/29/2006 4/5/2007 4/5/2007 8/30/2007 7/27/2007 9/6/2007 11/5/2007 Dauphin 40 25 11/20/2006 1/22/2007 3/27/2007 1/22/2007 1/22/2007 1/22/2007 1/22/2007 2/6/2007 3/27/2007 Franklin 22 6 2/4/2009 Fulton 13 0 4/1/2008 4/1/2008 5/6/2008 11/3/2008 11/5/2008 1/2/2009 11/5/2008 11/14/2008 3/13/2009 Huntingdon
    [Show full text]
  • N E W S L E T T E R Fall 2016 (Vol
    P1 Paxton Creek Watershed & Education Association Newsletter Fall 2016 Volume: 14 Issue: 1 Upcoming Stories in this issue: events: Board Election Results……………………………...Page 1 PCWEA MEETING Chesapeake Watershed Forum…………………Page 2 Monarch from Caterpillar to Butterfly……….Page 3 DECEMBER 6, 2016 Meet PCWEA Secretary Betsy Logan………….Page 4 4:00 - 5:00 (pm) Shout Out Alliance for Chesapeake Bay…..…Page 4 Location: HRG, Inc - 369 East Park Membership dues…………………………….…….…Page 5 Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17111 - Membership form…………………………….………Page 6 We are planning activities for Spring PCWEA is on Facebook 2017. Please share your ideas for www.facebook.com/PCWEA upcoming events and activities at the meeting, or on our Facebook page Paxton Creek Watershed & Education Association N e w s l e t t e r Fall 2016 (Vol. 14, Issue 1) CONGRATULATIONS TO OUR 2016 - 2017 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS In September of 2016, election ballots were mailed to our PCWEA Members asking them to vote for our 2016 Board. The Board received a great response and the votes were tallied. Please congratulate our leaders for 2016: Andrew Bliss Matt Bonanno Rhonda Hakundy-Jones Fred Heagy Arlene Taylor On October 4, 2016, after the new Board was established, officers were elected as follows: Andrew Bliss – President Matt Bonanno – Vice President Rob Davis – Treasurer Betsy Logan – Secretary Rhonda Hakundy-Jones – Communications Gary Smith - Membership Andy Ohrman - Newsletter Editor PCWEA is always looking for new members and ideas. Please contact one of the officers above if you are inter- ested in becoming a member or have ideas/projects for the watershed association.
    [Show full text]
  • Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Implementation of the Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive Program Agreement for Pennsylvania
    PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE VOLUNTARY PUBLIC ACCESS AND HABITAT INCENTIVE PROGRAM AGREEMENT FOR PENNSYLVANIA FINAL THE PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION In Partnership With U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency May 2011 ES- ES- BLANK ES - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Programmatic Environmental Assessment (PEA) describes the potential environmental consequences resulting from the proposed implementation of Pennsylvania’s Voluntary Public Access Habitat Incentive Program (VPA-HIP) agreement. The environmental analysis process is designed: to ensure the public is involved in the process and informed about the potential environmental effects of the proposed action; and to help decision makers take environmental factors into consideration when making decisions related to the proposed action. This PEA has been prepared by the Pennsylvania Game Commission in accordance with the requirements of the United States Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency (FSA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, the Council on Environmental Quality regulations implementing NEPA, and 7CFR 799 Environmental quality and Related Environmental Concerns – Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act. Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action The purpose of the proposed action is to implement Pennsylvania’s VPA-HIP agreement. Under the agreement, eligible private lands in Pennsylvania will be enrolled in the Pennsylvania Game Commission’s existing Public Access Cooperator Program and an enhanced
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Subbasin Survey Year-1
    Susquehanna River Basin Commission Lower Susquehanna River Subbasin Publication 282 Year-1 Survey September 2012 A Water Quality and Biological Assessment April - July 2011 Report by Ellyn Campbell Supervisor, Monitoring and Assessment SRBC • 1721 N. Front St. • Harrisburg, PA 17102-2391 • 717-238-0423 • 717-238-2436 Fax • www.srbc.net 1 Introduction The Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC) conducted a survey of the Lower Susquehanna River Subbasin from April through July 2011. This survey was conducted through SRBC’s Subbasin Survey Program, which is funded in part through the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). This program consists of two-year assessments in each of the six major subbasins (Figure 1) on a rotating schedule. The goals of this Year-1 survey were to collect one-time samples of the macroinvertebrate community, habitat, and water quality at 104 sites in the major tributaries and areas of interest throughout the Lower Susquehanna River Subbasin. The Year-2 survey, which is a more focused, in-depth study of a select area, will follow in late 2013 and be focused on the three major reservoirs comprising the last 45 miles of the Susquehanna River—Lake Clarke, Lake Aldred, and Conowingo Pond. Previous surveys of the Lower Susquehanna River Subbasin were conducted in 1985 (McMorran, 1986), 1996 (Traver, 1997), and 2005 (Buda, 2006). A comparison of the 1996 and 2005 data along with the 2011 results is included in this report. Subbasin survey information is used by SRBC staff and others to: • evaluate the chemical, biological, and habitat conditions of streams in the basin; Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGHWAY-RAILROAD and HIGHWAY BRIDGE CAPITAL BUDGET SUPPLEMENTAL ACT for 1999-2000 Act of Nov
    HIGHWAY-RAILROAD AND HIGHWAY BRIDGE CAPITAL BUDGET SUPPLEMENTAL ACT FOR 1999-2000 Act of Nov. 24, 1999, P.L. 550, No. 53 Cl. 86 A SUPPLEMENT To the act of December 8, 1982 (P.L.848, No.235), entitled "An act providing for the adoption of capital projects related to the repair, rehabilitation or replacement of highway bridges to be financed from current revenue or by the incurring of debt and capital projects related to highway and safety improvement projects to be financed from current revenue of the Motor License Fund," itemizing additional local and State bridge projects. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows: Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Highway-Railroad and Highway Bridge Capital Budget Supplemental Act for 1999-2000. Section 2. Definitions. The following words and phrases when used in this act shall have the meanings given to them in this section unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: "Account." The Highway Bridge Improvement Restricted Account within the Motor License Fund. "Capital project." A capital project as defined in section 302 of the act of February 9, 1999 (P.L.1, No.1), known as the Capital Facilities Debt Enabling Act, and shall include a county or municipal bridge rehabilitation, replacement or improvement project as set forth in this act. "Department." The Department of Transportation of the Commonwealth. "Secretary." The Secretary of Transportation of the Commonwealth. Section 3. Total authorization for bridge projects. (a) Total projects.--The total authorization for the costs of the projects itemized pursuant to this act and to be financed from current revenue or by the incurring of debt shall be $3,720,280,000.
    [Show full text]