DAUPHIN COUNTY COM?Rehenslve PLAN AUGUST 18,1992

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DAUPHIN COUNTY COM?Rehenslve PLAN AUGUST 18,1992 DAUPHIN COUNTY COM?REHENSlVE PLAN AUGUST 18,1992 / I I DAUPHIN COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AUGUST 18,1992’ VOLUME II: PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION DAUPHIN COUNTY PLANNING COMMlSSlON STAFF - 1992 Dauphin County Veterans Memorial Building 112 Market St., 7th Floor Harrisburg, PA 17101 -201 5 Telephone: (717) 234-2639 Executive Director ............................................. James R. Zeiters, AlCP Associate Director ............................................. James W. Szymborski, AlCP Staff Planner Ill ................................................. David F. Royer Timothy P. Reardon, AlCP Omar A. Syed Jeff Kelly Staff Planner II .................................................. Michael D. Rimer Rosemary Kosiek Michael Boyer Staff Planner I ................................................... Randall L. Heilman Christina Fackler Joseph Price Planning Technician 111 ...................................... George E. Hubley Planning Technician II ....................................... Louise L. Stewart Administrative Coordinator ................................ Patty L. Buggy Secretary .......................................................... Chris Keefer Legal Counsel ................................................... Thomas D. Caldwell, Jr. COST - $25.00 I I 1 I I DAUPHIN COUNTY - 1992 I Board of Commissioners Russell Sheaffer, Chairman I Sally Klein Anthony Petrucci 1 Planning Commission Dorthy Ross - Chairman Donald Horner - Vice-chairman I Barry Nazar - Secretary William Chianos - Treasurer Charles Leedecker 1 Norman Kennard John Orr I I 1 I I I I I I I I DAUPHIN COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I TABLE OF CONTENTS PHASE I I Chapter 1 - Introduction Chapter 2 - History of Dauphin County Chapter 3 - Natural Environment I Chapter 4 - Population/Socio-economic Chapter 5 - Economic Base Chapter 6 - Existing Land Use Chapter 7 - Housing I Chapter 8 - Transportation Chapter 9 - Existing Community Facilities and Services 1 Chapter 10 - Administration and Finances PHASE I1 I Chapter 11 - Goals and Objectives Chapter 12 - Future Land Use Plan Chapter 13 - Transportation Plan Chapter 14 - Community Facilities a Chapter 15 - Housing Plan Chapter 16 - Plan Administration and Implementation I I I I 1 I I I I 1 BASIC STUDIES I CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION I THE IMPORTANCE OF PLANNING Planning is an organized process that enables managers, I elected officials, planning commission members and others to define their community’s goals and objectives, set their priorities, and seek solutions to long-term issues. Participation in the planning process enables communities to monitor, analyze, and react I effectively to change within each individual community and the county as a whole. The established planning mechanisms such as zoning ordinances, subdivision and land ordinances, official maps, 1 and comprehensive plans can be used to guide future growth and development in the community. The Comprehensive Plan, a valuable planning tool, is broad in scope, examining physical, social and I economic features that mesh to make the county of today, while seeking to apply this knowledge to the future. THE PURPOSE OF THE PLAN I The Dauphin County Comprehensive Plan is a policy guide that encourages orderly development in promoting the health, safety, 1 convenience, and general welfare of its citizens. The Plan formalizes the County’s goals and objectives and serves as a blueprint for the establishment of action oriented programs focusing on the growth and development of the County. It offers an I orderly plan to support and manage the homes, businesses, schools, churches, industries, and government services that occupy the variety of land use patterns. The Plan comprehensively outlines I both the current and desired municipal character, and also delineates the economic development measures of the County. Once adopted, the Plan offers a framework for continual review and 1 revision of its elements, as necessary. THE PROCESS OF THE PLAN I The Comprehensive Plan is more accurately defined as a continuous process rather than as a document. Planning is a process of rationally evaluating and determining appropriate future 1 actions through a sequence of choices. To produce an accurate, useful Plan, the County should obtain essential community information that describes the existing environment, develop a plan that encourages the most acceptable future development, 1 prepare a schedule for a capital improvement program, and then implement and monitor these activities. I Planning is often a process of problem solving. After the problems have been diagnosed, goals and planning standards can be stated, alternative solutions can be considered, feasibility I analyses can be performed, and then the accepted policies can be implemented and evaluated. Public participation through surveys 1-1 I I I and public meetings are important in all phases of the development I of the Plan. Even though this Plan is a fluid process and may be modified I from time to time, it represents crucial decisions that are important to the welfare of the people. It embodies vital decisions of the population that the County may opt to accommodate, and the standards by which the County will be developed. It ~I mandates which land use types will be developed, where they will be located, and how they will be connected through the lines of communication and a circulation system. Decisions on the preservation of open space throughout the County are also included in the Comprehensive Plan. THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PLAN Three major steps are involved in the preparation of the Comprehensive Plan. First, the collecting of all essential information relating to the people and the land; second; after careful and thorough analysis of this information, the development of plans will encourage the most appropriate future development of the County while maintaining existing property values and seeking ways to provide necessary municipal facilities and services; and third; upon completion of the planning process involves putting these planning recommendations into proper action programs. This is accomplishedthroughthe adoption of official municipal maps and through the annual preparation and adoption of a capital improvement program. The Comprehensive Plan is divided into three plan elements. Phase I - Basic Studies, introduces the Introduction, History, Natural Environment, Population/Socio-Economic Profile, Economic Base, Existing Land Use, Transportation and Circulation, Housing, Community Facilities and Utilities, and County Administration and Finances. Phase I1 - The Plan Development, includes Community Development Goals, Future Land Use Plan, Transportation Plan, Community Facilities Plan, and Housing. Phase I11 - Implementation, Consists of the Capital Improvement Program and Administration. LEGISLATIVE AND LEGAL BASE FOR THE PLAN In the 1926 Euclid, Ohio vs Ambler Realty case, the United States Supreme Court established the precedent of allowing a community to direct its own development and growth. The justices declared that the town of Euclid, Ohio could indeed determine which land uses would be allowed within its political jurisdiction. Since that initial case, the courts have repeatedly upheld the right of a community to exercise a police power in legislating regulations governing the use of the land, within certain constraints. The legislative authority for Pennsylvania local governments to plan for and manage development within their boundaries emanates from the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Act 247, as amended. This enabling legislation lists the 1-2 planning tools available to communities to accomplish these goals. The primary method to protect and provide for the best interest of citizens is through adoption of a zoning ordinance. This should be supplemented by adoption of other supportive codes and ordinances such as a building code, housing code, subdivision and land development ordinance, and comprehensive plan. Upon adoption of a comprehensive plan by the County, Act 247 requires that municipalities submit for recommendations to the county planning agency any adoption, amendment, or repeal of an official map, subdivision and land development ordinance or a planned residential development ordinance. This ensures that the Dauphin County Planning Commission may provide recommendations relating to the location, opening, vacation, extension, widening, narrowing or enlargement of any street, public ground or watercourse and the location, erection, demolition or sale of any public structures located within Dauphin County. 1-3 I I CHAPTER 2 HISTORY i HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT An examination of the names of townships, municipalities, and I streets located within Dauphin County reveals the names of the courageous, tenacious men and women that left their homes in Philadelphia, West Chester, France, England, and Ireland to forge . I a new life in a pristine land. The first group of settlers, the French Huguenots such as Letort and Chartier, pushed through the frontier until they reached the Susquehanna River and the Indian Village of Peixtan. The original residents of Peixtan, the nomadic I Lenni Lenape Indians, received these pioneers and served as guides for the newcomers as they searched for animal pelts. I Survival in the harsh, rugged frontier demanded perseverance from those daring enough to surmount its daily challenges. The Scotch-Irish, colonists that possessed these attributes, migrated from Ulster, Ireland to the disputed Pennsylvania-Maryland border 1 and then to the areas along the Susquehanna
Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICES Such Addendum Shall Be Published in the Pennsylvania DEPARTMENT of Bulletin and Enforcement of the Addendum to the Order of Quarantine, Published at 44 Pa.B
    5955 NOTICES Such Addendum shall be published in the Pennsylvania DEPARTMENT OF Bulletin and enforcement of the Addendum to the Order of Quarantine, published at 44 Pa.B. 6947 issued Satur- AGRICULTURE day, November 1, 2014, with regard to that place or area shall become effective immediately. Addendum to the Order of Quarantine; Spotted Lanternfly Order Under authority of section 21 of the act (3 P.S. Recitals § 258.21), and with the Recitals previously listed incor- porated into and made a part hereof this Addendum to A. Spotted lanternfly, Lycorma delicatula, is a new pest the Order of Quarantine published at 44 Pa.B. 6947 to the United States and has been detected in the issued Saturday, November 1, 2014 by reference, the Commonwealth. This is a dangerous insect to forests, Department orders the following: ornamental trees, orchards and grapes and not widely prevalent or distributed within or throughout the Com- 1. Establishment of Quarantine. monwealth or the United States. Spotted lanternfly has A quarantine is hereby established with respect to been detected in the Commonwealth and has the poten- Albany, Greenwich, Ontalaunee, and Perry Townships, tial to spread to uninfested areas by natural means or Berks County; New Britain, and Plumstead Townships through the movement of infested articles. and Chalfont and New Britain Boroughs, Bucks County; West Vincent Township and Phoenixville Borough, Ches- B. The Plant Pest Act (Act) (3 P.S. §§ 258.1—258.27) ter County; Catasauqua and North Whitehall Townships, empowers The Department of Agriculture (Department) Lehigh County; Hatfield, Towamencin, Lower Salford, and to take various measures to detect, contain and eradicate Lower Providence Townships, Lansdale and Hatfield Bor- plant pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • Middletown Borough
    369 East Park Drive Harrisburg, PA 17111 (717) 564-1121 www.hrg-inc.com July 2017 CHESAPEAKE BAY POLLUTANT REDUCTION PLAN FOR MIDDLETOWN BOROUGH PREPARED FOR: MIDDLETOWN BOROUGH DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA HRG Project No. R000516.0459 ©Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc., 2017 CHESAPEAKE BAY POLLUTION REDUCTION PLAN FOR MIDDLETOWN BOROUGH, DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Introduction Section A – Public Participation Section B – Mapping Section C – Pollutants of Concern Section D – Determine Existing Loading for Pollutants of Concern Section E – BMPs to Achieve the Required Pollutant Load Reductions Section F – Identify Funding Mechanism Section G – BMP Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Appendices Appendix A – Public Participation Documentation Appendix B – Mapping Appendix C – PADEP Municipal MS4 Requirements Tables Appendix D – Existing Pollutant Loading Calculations Appendix E – Proposed BMP Pollutant Load Reduction Calculations Chesapeake Bay Pollutant Reduction Plan Middletown Borough, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania Page 1 Introduction Middletown Borough discharges stormwater to surface waters located within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and is therefore regulated by a PAG-13 General Permit, Appendix D (nutrients and sediment in stormwater discharges to waters in the Chesapeake Bay watershed). The Borough also has watershed impairments regulated by PAG-13 General Permit, Appendix E (nutrients and/or sediment in stormwater discharges to impaired waterways). This Chesapeake Bay Pollutant Reduction Plan (CBPRP) was developed in accordance with both PAG-13 requirements and documents how the Borough intends to achieve the pollutant reduction requirements listed in the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) Municipal MS4 Requirements Table1. This document was prepared following the guidance provided in the PADEP National Pollutant Discharges Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems Pollutant Reduction Plan (PRP) Instructions2.
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna River Basin Commission 4423 N
    ASSESSMENT OF NUTRIENT SOURCES FROM MAINSTEM AND SELECTED WATERSHEDS IN THE SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan SRBC-QA048 January 2017 – December 2018 PROJECT OFFICER: ____________________________________ Kevin H. McGonigal Susquehanna River Basin Commission 4423 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788 Gary Walters Mark Brickner PA Department of Environmental Protection PA Department of Environmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building Rachel Carson State Office Building 400 Market Street 400 Market Street Harrisburg, PA 17101 Harrisburg, PA 17101 James Hargett Richard Batiuk Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program Office U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 410 Severn Avenue, Suite 109 410 Severn Avenue, Suite 112 Annapolis, MD 21403 Annapolis, MD 21403 QUALITY ASSURANCE OFFICER: James P. Shallenberger Richard Batiuk Susquehanna River Basin Commission Chesapeake Bay Program Office 4423 N. Front Street 410 Severn Avenue, Suite 109 Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788 Annapolis, MD 21403 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective and Scope ....................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Data Usage .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • June 21, 2003 (Pages 2849-2962)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 33 (2003) Repository 6-21-2003 June 21, 2003 (Pages 2849-2962) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2003 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "June 21, 2003 (Pages 2849-2962)" (2003). Volume 33 (2003). 25. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2003/25 This June is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 33 (2003) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 33 Number 25 Saturday, June 21, 2003 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 2849—2962 Agencies in this issue: The Courts Delaware River Basin Commission Department of Banking Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Department of Public Welfare Department of Revenue Department of State Department of Transportation Environmental Quality Board Fish and Boat Commission Game Commission Health Care Cost Containment Council Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Liquor Control Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Philadelphia Regional Port Authority Public School Employees’ Retirement Board State Board of Certified Real Estate Appraisers State Board of Nursing State Board of Private Licensed Schools State Tax Equalization Board Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 343, June 2003 published weekly by Fry Communications, Inc. for the PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT MS4 Requirements Table
    DRAFT MS4 Requirements Table Anticipated Obligations for Subsequent NPDES Permit Term MS4 Name NPDES ID Individual Permit Impaired Downstream Waters or Requirement(s) Other Cause(s) of Required? Applicable TMDL Name Impairment Adams County ABBOTTSTOWN BORO No Beaver Creek Appendix E-Siltation (5) Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) BERWICK TWP No Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) Beaver Creek Appendix E-Siltation (5) BUTLER TWP No Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) CONEWAGO TWP No South Branch Conewago Creek Appendix E-Siltation (5) Plum Creek Appendix E-Siltation (5) Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) CUMBERLAND TWP No Willoughby Run Appendix E-Organic Enrichment/Low D.O., Siltation (5) Rock Creek Appendix E-Nutrients (5) Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) GETTYSBURG BORO No Stevens Run Appendix E-Nutrients, Siltation (5) Unknown Toxicity (5) Rock Creek Appendix E-Nutrients (5) Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) HAMILTON TWP No Beaver Creek Appendix E-Siltation (5) Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) MCSHERRYSTOWN BORO No Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) Plum Creek Appendix E-Siltation (5) South Branch Conewago Creek Appendix E-Siltation (5) MOUNT PLEASANT TWP No Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) NEW OXFORD BORO No
    [Show full text]
  • Entire Bulletin
    Volume 33 Number 11 Saturday, March 15, 2003 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 1315—1440 Agencies in this issue: The Governor The Courts Delaware River Basin Commission Department of Agriculture Department of Banking Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of State Department of Transportation Environmental Hearing Board Environmental Quality Board Fish and Boat Commission Game Commission Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Liquor Control Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Philadelphia Regional Port Authority State Board of Barber Examiners State Board of Funeral Directors State Board of Social Workers, Marriage and Family Therapists and Professional Counselors State Board of Veterinary Medicine State Employees’ Retirement Board Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 340, March 2003 published weekly by Fry Communications, Inc. for the PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents). Subscription rate $82.00 per year, postpaid to points in the United States. Individual copies $2.50. Checks for subscriptions and individual copies should be made payable to ‘‘Fry Communications, Inc.’’ Postmaster send address changes to: Periodicals postage paid at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Orders for subscriptions and other circulation matters FRY COMMUNICATIONS should be sent to: Attn: Pennsylvania Bulletin 800 W.
    [Show full text]
  • National Pollutant Discharge
    3800-PM-BCW0200e Rev. 8/2019 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Permit DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) INDIVIDUAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER FROM SMALL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS (MS4s) NPDES PERMIT NO. PAI133538 In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. Section 1251 et seq. (“the Act”) and Pennsylvania’s Clean Streams Law, as amended, 35 P.S. Section 691.1 et seq., Susquehanna Township Dauphin County 1900 Linglestown Road Harrisburg, PA 17110-3302 is authorized to discharge from a regulated small municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) located in Susquehanna Township, Dauphin County to Unnamed Tributary to Paxton Creek (WWF, MF), Asylum Run (WWF, MF), and Unnamed Tributary to Susquehanna River (WWF, MF) in Watershed(s) 7-C in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth herein. THIS PERMIT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 1, 2020 THIS PERMIT SHALL EXPIRE AT MIDNIGHT ON JULY 31, 2025 The authority granted by coverage under this Permit is subject to the following further qualifications: 1. The permittee shall comply with the effluent limitations and reporting requirements contained in this permit. 2. The application and its supporting documents are incorporated into this permit. If there is a conflict between the application, its supporting documents and/or amendments and the terms and conditions of this permit, the terms and conditions shall apply. 3. Failure to comply with the terms, conditions or effluent limitations of this permit is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of a permit renewal application.
    [Show full text]
  • Are You Loving Paxton Creek to Death?
    ARE YOU LOVING PAXTON CREEK TO DEATH? Do any of these pictures look familiar? They all represent actions that can negatively affect your local streams. Read more to learn how you can protect and restore Paxton Creek! Lawns are mowed right up to the stream edge and forest buffers are cleared Sediment enters waterways through storm drain inlets and in unmanaged construction site runoff Oil and grease spills and pesticides can enter waterways in stormwater runoff Runoff from rooftops and excessive pavement increases the total volume of runoff reaching the stream Paxton Creek Watershed and Education Association Center for Watershed Protection 2004 About the Paxton Creek Watershed Do you live, work or play in the Paxton Creek Watershed? You might and not even know it. Many small headwater streams flow into the tributaries of Paxton Creek, which empties into the Susquehanna River in the City of Harrisburg, and ultimately flows to the Chesapeake Bay. All of the land area drained by Paxton Creek and its 63 miles of tributaries and headwater streams is called the Paxton Creek watershed. The Paxton Creek watershed is approximately 27 square miles, and covers portions of Dauphin County: Susquehanna Township, Lower Paxton Township, the City of Harrisburg, and Penbrook Borough. Land use in the watershed includes forested mountain headwaters, low and medium density development Forested headwater stream of surrounding Harrisburg, and highly urban development near the City portion. Paxton Creek What is a Watershed? A watershed is the area of land that drains to a particular point along a stream. A watershed boundary is defined by the highest elevations surrounding the stream.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Flow, Base-Flow, and Mean-Flow Regression Equations for Pennsylvania Streams
    Low-Flow, Base-Flow, and Mean-Flow Regression Equations for Pennsylvania Streams By Marla H. Stuckey In cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5130 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to repro- duce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Stuckey, M.H., 2006, Low-flow, base-flow, and mean-flow regression equations for Pennsylvania streams: U.S. Geo- logical Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5130, 84 p. iii Contents Abstract. 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and Scope . 2 Previous Investigations . 2 Physiography and Drainage. 2 Development of Regression Equations . 2 Streamflow-Gaging Stations . 2 Basin Characteristics . 5 Regression Techniques . 5 Low-Flow Regression Equations. 6 Base-Flow Regression Equations. 10 Mean-Flow Regression Equations. 13 Limitations of Regression Equations . 15 Summary . 15 Acknowledgments . 17 References Cited. 17 Appendixes . 19 1. Streamflow-gaging stations used in development of low-flow, base-flow, and mean-flow regression equations for Pennsylvania streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1: Introduction
    Paxton Creek North Subwatershed Restoration Plan Produced by the Center for Watershed Protection for the Paxton Creek Watershed and Education Association Funded by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and the Canaan Valley Institute December 2004 Paxton Creek North Subwatershed Restoration Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary iii Section 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The Paxton Creek Watershed 1 1.2 History of Watershed Work in Paxton Creek 2 1.3 Paxton Creek North Subwatershed Restoration Plan 3 Section 2 Paxton Creek North Subwatershed Characterization 5 2.1 Review of Existing Monitoring Data 6 Hydrology 7 Biology 8 Water Quality 12 Geomorphology 16 Section 3 Methods 18 3.1 GIS Methods 18 Subwatershed Delineation 18 Impervious Cover Analysis 18 3.2 Field Methods 18 Unified Stream Assessment (USA) 19 Unified Subwatershed and Site Reconnaissance (USSR) 21 Retrofit Inventory 24 3.3 Project Prioritization Methods 24 3.4 Stakeholder Involvement Methods 25 Educational Materials 25 Public Meetings 26 Section 4 Results of Stream and Subwatershed Assessments 28 4.1 Preliminary Results 28 4.2 Priority Restoration Projects 31 Large-Scale Projects 34 Small-Scale Projects 40 Section 5 Recommendations 49 5.1 Subwatershed Goals 49 5.2 Subwatershed Recommendations 50 Short-Term Recommendations 52 Mid-Term Recommendations 53 Long-Term Recommendations 55 5.3 Long-Term Monitoring 56 5.4 Recommendations for Future Subwatershed Assessments 58 i Paxton Creek North Subwatershed Restoration Plan References 60 Appendices Appendix A: Paxton Creek Watershed Consensus
    [Show full text]