Sierra Leone –Bonthe District Profile
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Jan – Apr 2020 Activity Report
Rural Health Care Initiative Activity Report, January 2020 RHCI in Sierra Leone operates programs out of its office in Tikonko to support efforts in maternal and child health. The programs in this report include: ñ Mbao-mi Birth Waiting Home, Tikonko ñ Community Health Clinic birth waiting facility support, Kassama and Sembehun Tabema ñ Motorbike Outreach – Tikonko; serving Lembema, Dodo, Gbalehun and Sunga ñ Motorbike Outreach – Gondama; serving Gelehun, Sembehun Kokofele, Magbema and Gandorhun ñ Family Planning Services, Tikonko and surrounding villages Birth Waiting Homes The Mbao-mi accommodates 24 women and is staffed with a Senior Midwife, State Registered Nurse, Community Health Workers, security and administration personnel with two drivers for the RHCI vehicles. Women admitted are referred by the Tikonko Community Health Clinic (CHC) and receive lodging, food, health care, education, vocational training and transportation to the site of delivery and to their home village. Most women return to Mbao-mi after delivery for post-natal care, education and support. Mbao- mi provides staff and supplies to accompany the woman to the CHC for delivery. The Gondama Birth Waiting Home will accommodate 10 women and will provide similar services as Mbao-mi. The Kassama and Sembehun Tabema Peripheral Health Units (PHU’s) receive support from RHCI. The support includes medical supplies, medications and a stipend for food for women who stay at their facilities prior to labor and delivery. This arrangement was made between RHCI and these PHU’s due to their desire to keep deliveries at their CHC. Table 1. Number of Birth Waiting Home admissions in January, 2020. -
Table of Contents Table of Contents
1/2009 Delivering Justice to Sierra Leone’s Poor An Analysis of the Work of Timap for Justice Pamela Dale* * Comments and questions are welcome, and should be addressed to Pamela Dale ([email protected]). For questions on the World Bank‘s Justice for the Poor program in Sierra Leone, please contact Gibrill Jalloh ([email protected]), Lyttelton Braima ([email protected]), or [email protected]. DISCLAIMER Publications produced by the World Bank‘s Justice for the Poor program are intended to contribute to understanding, discussion, and debate on the practical and theoretical issues surrounding justice and governance reform. These publications provide the opportunity for a diverse array of authors to present interesting and up-to-date findings, tools, and lessons learned. Feedback from readers is encouraged, and should be sent to the author(s) at [email protected]. Though all J4P publications have undergone internal review to ensure factual accuracy and professional-quality research, the views expressed in these publications are those of the author(s), and do not necessarily reflect those of the World Bank, the Justice for the Poor program, or the program‘s funders and partners. Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... -
Growth Poles Program Political Economy of Social Capital
Public Disclosure Authorized GROWTH POLES PROGRAM POLITICAL ECONOMY OF SOCIAL CAPITAL Economic and Sector Work (ESW) Public Disclosure Authorized Poverty Reduction and Economic Management (PREM AFTP3) Competitive Industries Practice Finance and Private Sector Development (AFTFW) Public Disclosure Authorized World Bank Africa Region This image cannot currently be displayed. Public Disclosure Authorized April 2014 Copyright. 2013 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. 1818 H Street NW Washington DC Telephone: 202 473 1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org Email: [email protected] All Rights Reserved The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s), and do no not necessarily reflect the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank and its affiliated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Right and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Centre, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400,fax 978-750-4470, www.copyright.com . -
Sierra Rutile Project Area 1 – Environmental, Social and Health Impact Assessment: Mine Closure Plan
Sierra Rutile Project Area 1 – Environmental, Social and Health Impact Assessment: Mine Closure Plan Report Prepared for Sierra Rutile Limited Report Number: 515234/ Mine Closure Plan Report Prepared by March 2018 SRK Consulting: Project No: 515234/Closure Page i Sierra Rutile Project Area 1 – Environmental, Social and Health Impact Assessment: Mine Closure Plan Sierra Rutile Limited SRK Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd 265 Oxford Rd Illovo 2196 Johannesburg South Africa e-mail: [email protected] website: www.srk.co.za Tel: +27 (0) 11 441 1111 Fax: +27 (0) 11 880 8086 SRK Project Number 515234/ Mine Closure Plan March 2018 Compiled by: Reviewed by: James Lake, Pr Sci Nat Marius Van Huyssteen, CEAPSA Principal Scientist Principal Scientist/Associate Partner Email: [email protected] Authors: Fran Lake, James Lake LAKJ/vhuy 515234_Area 1_ MCP_Rep_Final_201803 March 2018 SRK Consulting: Project No: 515234/Closure Page ii Table of Contents Disclaimer .............................................................................................................................................. v List of abbreviations ............................................................................................................................... vi 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of this report ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 Project overview -
California Legal Studies Journal Spring 2013
CALIFORNIA LEGAL STUDIES JOURNAL Editor-in-Chief Anna Cai Editors Carla Bernal Sun Kyu Park Business Manager Sun Kyu Park Cover Design ErineNatnat University of California, Berkeley Fall 2012—Spring2013 Copyright 2013 by California Legal Studies Journal Authors retain all rights to their articles. ASUC Sponsored California Legal Studies Journal is not an official publication of the Associated Students of the University of California. The views expressed herein are the views of the writers and not necessarily the views of the ASUC or the views of the University of California, Berkeley. Acknowledgements The publication of this journal would not have been possible without the following individuals: The Associated Students of the University of California Lauri la Pointe, Legal Studies Advisor. RominaFilippou, former editor. Colleen Lee, former editor-in-chief. The Berkeley legal Studies Association. Submission Information Paper Requirements: The paper can be of any length and any topic as long as it is law-related in some way. Neither you nor the class for which the paper was written must be in the Legal Studies department. We encourage students from all disciplines to submit papers, as the study of law itself is an interdisciplinary effort! Restrictions: We do not publish previously published works. You may submit your unpublished work to multiple journals. However, if your paper is accepted to another publication you must inform us immediately. What to submit: Your paper should be double-spaced. Please include the additional items: 1. Cover sheet with the following information: a. Full name. b. Class and term for which paper was written. c. -
Shadow Colony: Refugees and the Pursuit of the Liberian
© COPYRIGHT by Micah M. Trapp 2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SHADOW COLONY: REFUGEES AND THE PURSUIT OF THE LIBERIAN- AMERICAN DREAM BY Micah M. Trapp ABSTRACT This dissertation is about the people living at the Buduburam Liberian refugee camp in Ghana and how they navigate their position within a social hierarchy that is negotiated on a global terrain. The lives of refugees living in Ghana are constituted through vast and complex social relations that span across the camp, Ghana, West Africa and nations further afield such as the United States, Canada and Australia. The conditions under which these relations have developed and continue to unfold are mediated by structural forces of nation-state policies, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the international governing body for refugees, and the global political economy. Situated within the broader politics of protracted refugee situations and the question of why people stay in long-term camps, this research is a case study of one refugee camp and how its people access resources, build livelihoods and struggle with power. In particular, this dissertation uses concepts of the Liberian-American dream and the shadow colony to explore the historic and contemporary terms and circumstances ii through which Liberian refugees experience and evaluate migratory prospects and restrictions. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The production of this dissertation has been an outcome of many places and people. In Washington, DC my committee members, Dolores Koenig, Geoffry Burkhart, and David Vine have provided patient support and provocative feedback throughout the entire process. Thank you for asking the right questions and reading so many pages. -
Sierra Leone Trial Monitoring Program Weekly Report
Page 1 of 4 U.C. Berkeley War Crimes Studies Center Sierra Leone Trial Monitoring Program Weekly Report Special Court Monitoring Program Update #49 Trial Chamber II - AFRC Trial Covering week ending July 15, 2005 by Michelle Staggs, Senior Researcher Summary Witness profiles Evidence at trial Legal and procedural issues Summary Proceedings in the AFRC trial continued to move quickly this week, with the prosecution calling a further eight witnesses in its case against the three accused. The accused each attended the trial for the majority of the week, the only exception being the absence of Santigie Borbor Kanu (aka “Five-five”) due to ill health. The Chamber closed on Friday so that members of the Sierra Leonean bar could attend the bar council elections. Witness profiles at a glance Witness TF1-033 is 45 years old and was born in Songo in the Port Loko District. The witness finished high-school and worked as a reporter for a local news tabloid, the State News Watch. The witness testified in English with the use of voice distortion. Witness TF1-055 is 75 years old and was born in Karina, in the Bombali district. The witness is married and has seven children currently alive. He testified in Madingo. Witness TF1-147 was born in Blama in the Bonthe district. He speaks Krio, Mende and English. He testified in Krio. Witness TF1-094 is a Category “C” witness (Victim of Sexual Violence) and was allegedly abducted as a child and a victim of multiple rape. She testified in Krio. Witness TF1-269 is a Category “C” witness (Victim of Sexual Violence) and testified with voice distortion. -
Kailahun District Constituencies And
NEC: Report on Electoral Constituency Boundaries Delimitation Process Process Delimitation Boundaries Constituency Electoral on Report NEC: 4.1.1 KAILAHUN DISTRICT CONSTITUENCIES AND POPULATION Eastern Region Constituency Maps 1103 a 43,427 m i a g g n K n e i o s T s T i i i s Penguia s K is is Yawei K K Luawa 1101 e 49,499 r 1104 1108 g n 33,457 54,363 o B Kpeje je e Upper West p K Bambara 1102 44,439 1107 Chiefdom Boundary 37,484 Constituency Code Njaluahun Mandu – 1101 Constituency 1 August 2006 August Dea 1102 Constituency 2 Jawie 1103 Constituency 3 1106 Malema 1104 Constituency 4 42,639 1105 Constituency 5 1105 1106 Constituency 6 52,882 1107 Constituency 7 1108 Constituency 8 42,639 Constituency Population PREPARED BY STATISTICS SIERRA LEONE KENEMA DISTRICT CONSTITUENCIES AND POPULATION Gorama Mende 1207 49,953 Wandor 1206 48,429 n u h Simbaru o g Lower le 1208 Dodo Bambara a M 54,312 1205 42,184 Kandu Leppiama 1204 51,486 1202 1201 42,262 Nongowa 43,308 # Small Bo # Kenema # 1203 1209 Town 42,832 44,045 Dama 1210 Niawa 36341 Gaura Langrama Koya 1211 Nomo 42,796 Chiefdom Boundary Constituency Code Tunkia 1201 Constituency 1 1202 Constituency 2 1203 Constituency 3 1204 Constituency 4 1205 Constituency 5 1206 Constituency 6 1207 Constituency 7 1208 Constituency 8 1209 Constituency 9 1210 Constituency 10 1211 Constituency 11 42,796 Constituency Population PREPARED BY STATISTICS SIERRA LEONE NEC: Report on Electoral Constituency Boundaries Delimitation Process – August 2006 NEC: Report on Electoral Constituency Boundaries Delimitation -
Perceptions of Challenges to Subsistence Agriculture, and Crop Foraging by Wildlife and Chimpanzees Pan Troglodytes Verus in Unprotected Areas in Sierra Leone
Perceptions of challenges to subsistence agriculture, and crop foraging by wildlife and chimpanzees Pan troglodytes verus in unprotected areas in Sierra Leone R OSA M. GARRIGA,IGNASI M ARCO,ENCARNA C ASAS-DÍAZ B ALA A MARASEKARAN and T ATYANA H UMLE Abstract The – Sierra Leone National Chimpanzee Keywords Anthropogenic landscape, chimpanzee, crop-raid- Census Project estimated there was a population of , ing, farming, human–wildlife coexistence, Pan troglodytes chimpanzees Pan troglodytes verus distributed across the verus country, with . % occurring outside protected areas. The census also highlighted the significance of competition be- tween people and chimpanzees for resources in areas domi- nated by farming activities where wild chimpanzees forage on Introduction crops. We selected four study areas in two districts in Sierra Leone with high chimpanzee density in habitats dominated ompetition for resources between wildlife and people is by agriculture, far from any protected areas. Our objectives Ca widespread concern in places where they coexist were to assess farmers’ perceptions of the main challenges (Woodroffe et al., ). Wild animals are an important to their agricultural yields, and the wildlife involved in crop part of the life and diet of many local people in developing foraging, and their perceptions of chimpanzees in particular, countries (Hoffman & Cawthorn, ) but habitat loss, as well as the main crop protection measures used. We con- agricultural expansion (Maxwell et al., ) and human en- ducted semi-structured interviews with local farmers croachment into wildlife habitat are key drivers of wildlife across the four study areas. We found that ()farmersre- population decline and even local extinctions (Van Vliet ported wild animals as the main challenge to their agricultur- et al., ). -
March, 2016. Editor: John Birchall
The Journal of Sierra Leone Studies – March, 2016. Editor: John Birchall Welcome to The Journal of Sierra Leone Studies. This is the first Journal dedicated solely to Sierra Leone to have been published for a long time. We hope that it will be of use to academics, students and anyone with an interest in what for many is a rather ‘special’ country. The Journal will not concentrate on one area of academic study and invites contributions from anyone researching and writing on Sierra Leone to send their articles to: John Birchall for consideration. Prospective contributions should be between 3500-5000 words in length, though we will in special circumstances consider longer articles and authors can select whether they wish to be peer reviewed or not. Articles should not have appeared in any other published form before. The Editorial Board reserves the right to suggest changes they consider are needed to the relevant author (s) and to not publish if such recommendations are ignored. We are particularly interested to encourage students working on subjects specifically relating to Sierra Leone to submit their work. Thank you so much for visiting The Journal and we hope that you (a) find it both interesting and of use to you and (b) that you will inform colleagues, friends and students of the existence of a Journal dedicated to the study of Sierra Leone. Editorial Board: Professor Arthur Abraham, Virginia State University, Peter Andersen, Abdul Bangura, Howard University, Saidu Bangura, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, John Birchall, Professor Tucker Childs, University of Portland, Ade Daramy, Nigel Davies, Queen Mary’s College ,University of London, Lisa Denney, Overseas Development Institute, London, Melbourne Garber, Lansana Gberie, Dave Harris, Bradford University, Professor Adam Jones, University of Leipzig, Gary Schulze, Joko Sengova, John Trotman., Professor Alfred Zak- Williams, University of Central Lancashire, Joe A.D. -
The Governance of Artisanal Fisheries in the Sherbro River Area of Sierra Leone
The Governance of Artisanal Fisheries in the Sherbro River Area of Sierra Leone This project is funded by A report by The European Union Environmental Justice Foundation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY © EJF This report sets out the historic and existing governance arrangements for artisanal fishing in the Sherbro River Estuary (hereafter ‘the Estuary’), where fishing is vital to the livelihoods and food security of local communities. It uses research from 17 community visits and interviews of key stakeholders to analyse current and historic conditions at the levels of local communities, traditional authorities, local government and central government. Four key findings and recommendations are summarised below: 1. FINDING: After seven years of decentralisation, local councils are not perceived to be effective at fisheries management: The clearest consensus in the area of governance to arise during the community engagement process regarded the perceived ineffectiveness of local councils. Even within the councils themselves, there was widespread agreement that they did not currently have the capacity to assume their statutory duties in the area of fisheries management. More broadly, fishing communities across the Estuary did not identify closely with the councils or their elected representatives. RECOMMENDATION: For councils to become effective in the area of fisheries management, they must not only build technical capacity in the fisheries sector but also improve their overall legitimacy as representative and accountable democratic institutions. This can be done in part through increasing contact with elected officials and pooling the regulatory resources of the Estuary’s two councils. The Government and partner NGOs must address this as part of the development of an MPA and associated co-management bodies. -
Restoring Food Security to Flood-Affected Families in Sierra Leone
RESTORING FOOD SECURITY TO FLOOD-AFFECTED FAMILIES IN SIERRA LEONE After heavy and above-average rains fell in September 2015 in the Southern Province and Western Area, an estimated 22 000 people were affected and thousands of hectares of land were destroyed. The worst of the damage occurred in Bo, Bonthe and Pujehun districts. Because many households in Sierra Leone depend on agriculture for their food and income, the loss of crops and seeds devastated the food and nutrition security of farmers in these areas, who were already at the peak of the lean season. This project was implemented to immediately improve ©FAO Sierra Leone household food security while allowing farmers to restart agricultural production during the main growing season. WHAT DID THE PROJECT DO? KEY FACTS Critical agricultural inputs (seed rice, vegetable seeds, fertilizers Contribution and simple hand tools) were provided to 1 781 flood-affected USD 475 000 households in Bo, Bonthe and Pujehun districts to restart agricultural production activities. This distribution was Duration supplemented by capacity building in food-crop production. May 2016 – May 2017 Resilience building and disaster risk management (DRM) Resource Partners training improved the capacities of communities to deal with FAO future disasters, built resilience and strengthened preparedness for agricultural risk mitigation. A DRM contingency plan was Partners also developed, and the capacities of the newly established Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry district disaster management committees (DDMCs) were and Food Security, Community Action enhanced. for Rural Development Beneficiaries IMPACT 1 781 flood-affected farmers, After inputs were supplied to the flood-affected households members of the three DDMCs that are and technical assistance was extended, rice yields returned made up of government authorities, to the levels that they were before the flooding, approximately Non-governmental Organizations 1.7 tonnes per hectare.