DOCSLIB.ORG

Context for the Research / Problem Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Context for the Research / Problem Statement CIVIL SOCIETY STRATEGIES ON URBAN WATERWAYS: Stewardship, Contention, and Coalition Building by Lindsay Kathleen Campbell A.B., Woodrow Wilson School of Public Policy and International Affairs (2002) Princeton University Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master in City Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2006 © Lindsay Campbell All rights reserved Signature of Author………………………………………………………………………………… Department of Urban Studies and Planning May 23, 2006 Certified by………………………………………………………………………………………… JoAnn Carmin, Professor Department of Urban Studies and Planning Thesis Supervisor Accepted by……………………………………………………………………………………… Langley Keyes, Ford Professor Department of Urban Studies and Planning Chair, MCP Committee ABSTRACT Urban, industrial waterways—with their contamination, environmental injustice, and nebulous development futures given changing economies—present multiple problems that are confronted by environmental civil society organizations. Despite the many problems, these groups view urban waterways as some of the last available open space in the city and as potential public amenities and natural resources that merit revitalization. This work focuses on the means by which citizen groups and nonprofit organizations—which are often in positions of relatively less power and authority vis-à-vis public and private actors—attempt to engage, be heard, and leverage influence over decision-making on and end use of three New York City river resources. Depending on the situation and the groups involved, strategies rooted in conflict or collaboration rise to the fore. Civil society organizations select from “insider” strategies based on cooperation with government, “outsider” strategies that depend upon advocacy and pressure tactics directed towards either government or the private sector, and “independent” strategies like stewardship, education, and environmental monitoring that engage with the resource, regardless of the political and policy context. To understand the selection and efficacy of strategies in general and alliance-building in specific, this thesis examines the following questions: 1) how do internal and external factors shape the strategies that civil society actors select as they seek to engage in the protection of urban industrial waterways?; 2) to what extent and for what reasons are civil society actors pursuing collaboration and coalition building as a preferred strategy? and 3) what environmental and social outcomes are achieved as a consequence of different strategic approaches? To address these questions I conducted case studies of the Bronx River, the Newtown Creek, and the Gowanus Canal. As a comparative study, this thesis reveals that the complex challenges of restoration in the urban environment require equally complex solutions. There is no one single, prescriptive approach that will yield more successful environmental and social outcomes. Strategies are products of resource constraints, political opportunities, community contexts, and deeply embedded group ideologies. While groups have a dominant strategy, they can shift and evolve over time in response to different triggers. For all of the benefits of this pluralism, cooperation is the strategy that can serve to bring the most resources to bear for long term planning and revitalization. Coalition building requires divergent ideologies to be aligned and find common ground, and it is a deliberate process that requires entrepreneurial leadership by both citizens and public servants. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, thank you to all of my interviewees who took the time to speak with me and to share their stories and the stories of the organizations that they support. The waterways of New York City would be very different without these individuals and groups; and I am inspired and humbled by their commitment. They are just a small slice of the thousands of dedicated citizens who integrate stewardship, protection, care, and improvement of the urban environment into their everyday and professional lives. I’d also like to thank my advisor JoAnn Carmin for her guidance throughout the entire thesis writing process. From coursework, to proposal writing, to drafts and revisions, she provided me with critical mentoring and support. Thanks also to my reader Anne Spirn for her feedback towards the end and to Judith Tendler for her thoughts at the beginning stages during thesis preparation coursework. I am grateful to the MIT-USGS Science Impact Collaborative, Larry Susskind, and Herman Karl for seeing the relevance of civil society behavior and the urban ecosystem to issues of collaborative environmental decision making. Just as this program has expanded my area of interest, so too do I hope my thesis can make a contribution to their field. Thanks also to my employer, the USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research station, Mark Twery, and Erika Svendsen, for allowing me to pursue my field work in New York City during the summer of 2005. Being given the time and capacity to truly ground this thesis in the field was vital. In turn, I expect that I can bring the lessons I’ve learned back to practice. Finally, much gratitude goes to my roommate, friends, and family, who were with me each step of the way. They provided everything from proofreading to moral support to welcome distraction and I could not have done this without them. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 7 Chapter 2: Bronx River: a top-down and bottom-up coalition 35 Chapter 3: Newtown Creek: a maverick advocacy group shifts towards collaboration 59 Chapter 4: Gowanus Canal: stewardship and community development through 81 independent action Chapter 5: Discussion and Conclusion 107 Appendix 1: Diagram and Chart 129 Appendix 2: Maps 131 Appendix 3: Chronologies 141 Appendix 4: Organizational Charts 153 Works Cited 157 LIST OF ACRONYMS BCUE Brooklyn Center for the Urban Environment BOA Brownfield Opportunity Area BRA Bronx River Alliance CDC community development corporation COE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CSO civil society organization DEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation DEP New York City Department of Environmental Protection DOT New York State Department of Transportation EDC New York City Economic Development Corporation EIS environmental impact statement EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FROGG Friends and Residents of Greater Gowanus GCCDC Gowanus Canal Community Development Corporation GMDC Greenpoint Manufacturing and Design Center GWAPP Greenpoint Waterfront Association for Parks and Planning (formerly Greenpoint Williamsburg Against the Power Plant) MWA Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance NCA Newtown Creek Alliance NCMC Newtown Creek Monitoring Committee NIMBY Not In My Back Yard NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NPS National Park Service PICCED Pratt Institute Center for Community and Environmental Development SSB Sustainable South Bronx SMO social movement organization URP Urban Resources Partnership YMPJ Youth Ministries for Peace and Justice 5 6 I. INTRODUCTION Changes in the global and local economies have led to the retrenchment of water- dependent industry on many urban waterways. Urban areas in the Northeastern United States that were dependent on rivers as their economic lifeblood in the industrial era must reconsider their functions in the post-industrial age. At one time, these waterways played host to diverse industries from chemical manufacturing to oil and gas processing, to smelting—uses which are now rarely found within urban centers (Merchants Association of New York Industrial Bureau [MANY], 1921). New York City was dependent on shipping and water-based transportation until the second half of the 20th century when many of the major bridge, tunnel, and highway projects were completed, trucking became more popular than shipping, and the freight forwarding industry relocated from Brooklyn to New Jersey. In particular, highway infrastructure that was created in the 1950s and 1960s, including the Cross Bronx Expressway (completed in 1963), the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge between Brooklyn and Staten Island (completed in 1964), and the Brooklyn Queens Expressway (completed in 1964) had a major effect on shipping-based industries (Eastern Roads, 2006). It made many firms located on the Gowanus Canal, Newtown Creek and Bronx River less dependent on water-based transport and encouraged them either to switch to using highway based trucking or simply to relocate out of New York City (Dolkart, 1989). The decline of industry was hastened by high real estate, insurance, and labor costs in New York City. Issues of space constraint, real estate uncertainty, and high costs—particularly for liability insurance, employee health benefits, real estate, and utilities—continue to be main concerns of the city’s industrial sector today (NYC Office of the Mayor, 2005). Over 100 years of industrial activity, along with the existence of a combined sewer system that outfalls directly into rivers if the system is overtaxed during a heavy rain, has created myriad environmental problems for New York City waterways and the humans that live near them. Oil and heavy metal-contaminated water and silt, along with low dissolved oxygen content, eutrophication, and low visibility are common conditions that impair plant and animal life. Similarly, waterfront industrial properties have all the problems of real or perceived brownfields contamination.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Record of Decision Brookfield Avenue Landfill Site Operable Unit No
    - -Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Remediation Record of Decision Brookfield Avenue Landfill Site Operable Unit No. 2 New York City, Richmond County,New York Site Number 243006 March 2007 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ELIOT SPITZER, Governor Brookfield Avenue Landfill Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Site Operable Unit No. 2 New York City, Richmond County, New York Site No. 243006 Statement of Pur~oseand Basis The Record of Decision (ROD) presents the selected remedy for: Operable Unit #2 the Brookfield Avenue Landfill Site, a Class 2 inactive hazardous waste disposal site. The selected remedial program was chosen in accordance with theNew York State Environmental Conservation Law and is not inconsistent with the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan of March 8, 1990 (40CFR300), as amended. This decision is based on the Administrative Record of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department) for: Operable Unit 2 of the Brookfield Avenue Landfill Site inactive hazardous waste disposal site, and the public's input to the Proposed Remedial Action Plan (PRAP) presented by the Department. A listing of the documents included as a part of the Administrative Record is included in Appendix B of the ROD. Assessment of the Site Actual or threatened release of hazardous waste constituents from the Brookfield Avenue Landfill Site will be addressed by implementing the OU-1 Remedy identified in this ROD. The capping of the landfill and other engineering controls at the site will significantly reduce the threat to public health and the environment. Descri~tionof Selected Remedy Based on the results of the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RVFS) for the Brookfield Avenue Landfill Site and the criteria identified for evaluation of alternatives, the Department has selected the following remedy for OU-2: Alternative #2, Institutional Controls and Monitoring, in combination with the OU-l selected alternative as the remedy for this site.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 City Council District Profiles
    QUEENS CITY Flushing, East Flushing, Murray Hill, COUNCIL 2009 DISTRICT 20 Auburndale, Queensboro Hill Parks are an essential city service. They are the barometers of our city. From Flatbush to Flushing and Morrisania to Midtown, parks are the front and backyards of all New Yorkers. Well-maintained and designed parks offer recreation and solace, improve property values, reduce crime, and contribute to healthy communities. SHOWCASE : Kissena Park The Daffodil Project, a partnership between New Yorkers for Parks and the NYC Parks Department, was cre- ated as a citywide beautification project and living memorial to September 11. Each year, thanks to the generous donation of B&K Flowerbulbs, the two groups distribute hundreds of thousands of free daffodil bulbs for volun- teers and community groups to plant in New York City’s parks and open spaces. In 2008 the Friends of Kissena Park, a Margaret Carman Green, Flushing neighborhood conservancy group, The Bloomberg Administration’s physical barriers or crime. As a result, planted more than 1,000 daffodils in Kissena Park. Visit www.ny4p. PlaNYC is the first-ever effort to studies show significant increases in org for more information on sustainably address the many infra- nearby real estate values. Greenways The Daffodil Project. structure needs of New York City, are expanding waterfront access including parks. With targets set for while creating safer routes for cyclists stormwater management, air quality and pedestrians, and the new initia- and more, the City is working to tive to reclaim streets for public use update infrastructure for a growing brings fresh vibrancy to the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Fresh Kills Dumped : a Policy Assessment for the Management of New York City's Residential Solid Waste in the Twenty-First Century
    New Jersey Institute of Technology Digital Commons @ NJIT Theses Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 5-31-2003 Fresh kills dumped : a policy assessment for the management of New York City's residential solid waste in the twenty-first century Aaron William Comrov New Jersey Institute of Technology Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/theses Part of the Sustainability Commons Recommended Citation Comrov, Aaron William, "Fresh kills dumped : a policy assessment for the management of New York City's residential solid waste in the twenty-first century" (2003). Theses. 615. https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/theses/615 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at Digital Commons @ NJIT. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ NJIT. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be liable for copyright infringement, This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Atonement in Fresh Kills: from Landfill to Landscape Marissa Reilly
    Vassar College Digital Window @ Vassar Senior Capstone Projects 2013 Ecological Atonement in Fresh Kills: From Landfill to Landscape Marissa Reilly Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone Recommended Citation Reilly, Marissa, "Ecological Atonement in Fresh Kills: From Landfill to Landscape" (2013). Senior Capstone Projects. 187. http://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone/187 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Window @ Vassar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Window @ Vassar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ecological Atonement in Fresh Kills: From Landfill to Landscape Marissa Reilly Urban Studies April 2013 Senior Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Arts Degree in Urban Studies ________________________________________ Adviser, Brian Godfrey ________________________________________ Advisor, Tobias Armborst TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………...….3 Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………………………..…..…..4 Chapter 2: A History of New York City’s Atoned Spaces……………….………………..16 A Park for the People………………………………………….……………..….17 Atonement Atop The High Line………………………………….………….…..22 From Landfill to Landscape……………………………………….……...….….27 Chapter 3:The Competition: Re-conceptualization Nature Atop a Space of Track……35 Parklands by Hargreaves Associates………………………………….…...….37 Fresh Kills by John
    [Show full text]
  • About Fresh Kills
    INTERNATIONAL DESIGN COMPETITION : 2001 ABOUT FRESH KILLS Fresh Kills Landfill is located on the western shore of Staten Island. Approximately half the 2,200-acre landfill is composed of four mounds, or sections, identified as 1/9, 2/8, 3/4 and 6/7 which range in height from 90 feet to approximately 225 feet. These mounds are the result of more than 50 years of landfilling, primarily household waste. Two of the four mounds are fully capped and closed; the other two are being prepared for final capping and closure. Fresh Kills is a highly engineered site, with numerous systems put in place to protect public health and environmental safety. However, roughly half the site has never been filled with garbage or was filled more than twenty years ago. These flatter areas and open waterways host everything from landfill infrastructure and roadways to intact wetlands and wildlife habitats. The potential exists for these areas, and eventually, the mounds themselves, to support broader and more active uses. With effective preparation now, the city can, over time, transform this controversial site into an important asset for Staten Island, the city and the region. Before dumping began, Fresh Kills Landfill was much like the rest of northwest Staten Island. That is, most of the landfill was a salt or intertidal marsh. The topography was low-lying, with a subsoil of clay and soils of sand and silt. The remainder of the area was originally farmland, either actively farmed, or abandoned and in stages of succession. Although Fresh Kills Landfill is not a wholly natural environment, the site has developed its own unique ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the New York City District
    DESCRIPTION OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT. -By F. J. H. Merrill, N. H. Dartoii, Arthur Hollick, B. D. Salisbury, li. E. Dodge, Bailey Willis, and H. A. Pressey. GENERAL GEOGRAPHY OF THE DISTRICT. By Richard E. Dodge and Bailey Willis. Position. The district described in tins folio is Gedney, and Main channels. Ambrose and Swash Harlem River and Spuyten Duyvil Creek the Coastal Plain in general are low peninsulas sepa­ bounded by the meridians of 78° 45' and 74° 15' channels have a least depth of 3-J- fathoms, while water is but 2 to 3^ fathoms deep. rated by estuaries, in which the tide ebbs and west longitude from Greenwich and the parallels Gedney and Main channels are nowhere less than Newark Bay is an extensive water body, but it flows. These peninsulas are composed of beds of of 40° 30' and 41° north latitude. It covers one- 5 fathoms deep. Within the bar the Lower Bay i is not available for sea-going commerce, as the clay, sand, and gravel, or mixtures of these mate­ quarter of a square degree, equivalent, in this is from 4 to 12 fathoms deep well out from shore, depth is but 2 fathoms or less, except in a little rials constituting loam, and are extensively devel­ latitude, to 905.27 square miles. The map is but toward the New Jersey and Staten Island j channel near the outlet connecting with the Kill oped in Maryland, Delaware, and New Jersey. divided into four atlas sheets, called the Paterson, shores the water shoals to 3 fathoms or less over \ van Kull.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Case 09-E-0428
    STATE OF NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Case 09-E-0428 – Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules and Regulations of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. for Electric Service Reliability Performance Mechanism – Major Outage Metric INITIAL REPORT OF CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. CONCERNING NETWORK AND LOAD AREA OUTAGES RESULTING FROM SUPERSTORM SANDY CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. By its Attorney: Martin F. Heslin Assistant General Counsel 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003 (212) 460-4705 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Overview of Major Outage Incidents Resulting from Superstorm Sandy .......................................... 3 III. Preemptive Network Shutdowns ......................................................................................................... 3 A. Description of Outage Incident ................................................................................................. 3 B. Applicability of RPM Exclusions .............................................................................................. 4 IV. Shutdown of Eleven Networks in Manhattan ..................................................................................... 5 A. Description of Outage Incident ................................................................................................. 5 B. Applicability
    [Show full text]
  • Staten Island, New York Draft Master Plan March 2006
    FRESH KILLS PARK: LIFESCAPE STATEN ISLAND, NEW YORK DRAFT MASTER PLAN MARCH 2006 FRESH KILLS PARK: DRAFT MASTER PLAN MARCH 2006 prepared for: THE CITY OF NEW YORK Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING Amanda M. Burden, Director New York City Department of Parks & Recreation New York City Department of Sanitation New York City Department of Cultural Affairs New York City Department of Transportation Offi ce of the Staten Island Borough President New York State Department of State New York State Department of Environmental Conservation New York State Department of Transportation Municipal Art Society prepared by: FIELD OPERATIONS 475 Tenth Avenue, 10th Floor New York, New York 10018 212.433.1450 in collaboration with: Hamilton, Rabinovitz & Alschuler AKRF, Inc. Applied Ecological Services Arup GeoSyntec Skidmore, Owings & Merrill Stan Allen Architect L’Observatoire International Tomato Richard Lynch Curry & Kerlinger Mierle Laderman Ukeles The New York Department of State, through the Division of Coastal Resources, has provided funding for the Fresh Kills Park Master Plan under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund for further information: www.nyc.gov/freshkillspark Fresh Kills Park Hotline: 212.977.5597, ex.275 New York City Representative: 311 or 212.NEW.YORK Community Advisory Group James P. Molinaro, President, Borough of Staten Island Michael McMahon, Councilman, City of New York James Oddo, Councilman, City of New York Andrew Lanza, Councilman, City of New York Linda Allocco, Executive Director,
    [Show full text]
  • Fresh Kills Park GEIS
    APPENDIX B PHASE 1A ARCHAEOLOGY DOCUMENTARY STUDY Phase 1A Archaeological Documentary Study Fresh Kills Park Richmond County, New York Prepared for: New York City Department of City Planning and New York City Department of Parks and Recreation Prepared by: AKRF, Inc. 440 Park Avenue South New York, New York 10016 March 2008 Table of Contents Chapter I: Introduction.............................................................................................................I-1 A. Project Overview ............................................................................................................ I-1 B. Research Goals And Methodology ................................................................................. I-3 Chapter II: Environmental/Physical Setting......................................................................... II-1 A. Geology and Topography..............................................................................................II-1 B. Paleoenvironment ..........................................................................................................II-2 C. Current Conditions.........................................................................................................II-2 D. Previously Conducted Cultural Resource Investigations Within One Mile of the Project Area .........................................................................................................II-3 Chapter III: Precontact And Contact Period Resources.....................................................III-1 A. Introduction.................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Freshkills Park a Communications Strategy to Address Public Health Concerns
    Freshkills Park A Communications Strategy to Address Public Health Concerns 1 The Team Jenni Chun Daniel Giuffrida Daniel Held Sarah Hogue Tyler Johnson Dina Mustafa Monica Perez Nevarez Pamela Quinlan Robert Sciortino Julie Shershavin Jonathan Simkins Sean Simpson Faculty Advisor: Louise Rosen 2 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 9 Project Scope of Work 9 Freshkills Park Background 10 Infrastructure Background 13 Survey Data Research 15 Data Provided 15 Research Methodology & Key Findings 15 Scientific Research 19 Communications Best Practices 23 Landfill-to-Parks Case Studies 23 Risk Communication Theory 25 Crisis Communication Case Studies 27 Freshkills Park Current Communications Approach 29 Community Outreach 29 Print 29 Social Press 30 Newsletter 30 SWOT Analysis Key Findings 33 Recommended Communication Plan 35 Elements of a Communications Strategy 35 Establishing the Communications Goal 35 Target Audience 36 The Message 39 Tactics: How to Reach the Audience 43 Message Customization Strategy 51 3 Communications Strategy Action Plan 53 Budget Scenarios 55 Implementation of Communications Strategy 58 Acknowledgments 60 Appendix 63 Appendix A: Fresh Kills Landfill History 63 Appendix B: Data Analysis 65 Appendix C: Freshkills Park Scientific Research 66 Appendix D: Airborne Risks 67 Appendix E: Groundwater Risks 69 Appendix F: Soil Risks 70 Appendix G: Surface Water and Sediment Risks 71 Appendix H: Landfill-to-Parks Case Studies 73 Appendix I: Risk Communication Theory 80 Appendix J: Crisis Communication Case Studies, BP Oil Spill 86 Appendix K: Crisis Communication Case Studies, Banks 90 Appendix L: Influencer Marketing 92 Appendix M: Controlled Messaging 94 Appendix N: Influenced Messaging 108 Appendix O: Best Practices with News Press 115 References 118 Tables and Figures 130 4 Executive Summary 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshkills Park What Is Freshkills? at 2,200 Acres, Freshkills Park Is the Largest Landfill-To-Park Project in the World
    Freshkills Park What is Freshkills? At 2,200 acres, Freshkills Park is the largest landfill-to-park project in the world. New York City’s residential waste was brought here from 1948-2001. Now, the City of New York is working to create a great new park for nature, art, recreation, and education through engineering, design, science and technology. In the past it was trash. New York City first processed waste at Fresh Kills between 1914 and 1918 at a plant that converted trash into useful fuels. The City also dumped trash into the ocean until a Supreme Court ruling in 1934 put a stop to that method. In 1938, Parks Commissioner Robert Moses proposed a landfill at Fresh Kills. The site’s wetlands were considered a nuisance and Moses planned to fill them in with trash for three years and then use the area for parks, private residential development, and industry. The first scow* of garbage arrived at Fresh Kills in 1948 and by the mid 1990s Fresh Kills Landfill was the largest landfill in the world and the main collector of household garbage in NYC. *SCOW: a flat-bottomed boat used to transport large loads Closing the landfill The Fresh Kills Community voices were finally heard in site in its natural 1996 when a law was passed that required state, before the landfill to stop accepting waste by De- landfilling began, cember 31, 2001. By 1997, The City of New was primarily tidal creeks and York Department of Sanitation (DSNY) had coastal marsh. capped two of the landfill’s four mounds, covering the garbage with layers of soil, impermeable materials, and thousands of linear feet of underground pipes and infra- structure, topped with clean soil and seeded with grasses.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council District Profiles
    QUEENS Whitestone, Fort Totten, Bay Terrace, Clearview, CITY College Point, Murray Hill, Auburndale, COUNCIL 2009 DISTRICT 19 Douglas Manor, Douglaston, Little Neck Parks are an essential city service. They are the barometers of our city. From Flatbush to Flushing and Morrisania to Midtown, parks are the front and backyards of all New Yorkers. Well-maintained and designed parks offer recreation and solace, improve property values, reduce crime, and contribute to healthy communities. SHOWCASE : Bayside Fields The 2008 Spotlight on Recreation is a new project of New Yorkers for Parks award-winning Report Card on Parks. This report exam- ines the conditions of athletic fields, courts, and playgrounds in a random selection of neighbor- hood parks. Each outdoor recre- ation feature was inspected on three separate site visits, once each in June, July, and August to show the performance of these specific features over the course of the summer. Bayside Fields was surveyed for this project. Francis Lewis Park, Whitestone The athletic fields’ rating re- The Bloomberg Administration’s physical barriers or crime. As a result, flected a need for improvement. Visit www.ny4p.org for more PlaNYC is the first-ever effort to studies show significant increases in information on the Spotlight sustainably address the many infra- nearby real estate values. Greenways on Recreation: A Report Card structure needs of New York City, are expanding waterfront access on Parks Project. including parks. With targets set for while creating safer routes for cyclists stormwater management, air quality and pedestrians, and the new initia- and more, the City is working to tive to reclaim streets for public use update infrastructure for a growing brings fresh vibrancy to the city.
    [Show full text]