DOCSLIB.ORG

The Skeptic Volume 27 Number 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Skeptic Volume 27 Number 1 Autumn 2007, Vol 27, No 1 Feature Articles 8. Challenging Beliefs 40. It Gets You Thinking Tony Wheeler Ian Jackson 13. SMS = Stupid Message Services 42. Humour: Walkerbout Guy Curtis Steve Walker 18. Welcome to Sunnydale 45. Satire: Healthmanship Pt 2 Chris Borthwick David Brookman 23. The Foolishness of God 47. Report: The Amazing Meeting 5 Brian Baxter Margaret Kittson 26. The Persuaders and Their Pills Elizabeth Pittman 31. Investigation: Ghost Mining Karen Stollznow Forum 36. Skepticism in Africa 50. Do mind & mental illnesses really exist? Leo Igwe Various In the last issue we published an article that suggested 38. Dumb, Dumber & Really Dumb at the ABC they did not. Many readers disagreed and you can read Ken McLeod why in our Forum section. Regular Items 4. Editorial — To Be a Skeptic 56. Letters Barry Williams 61. Notices 6. Around the Traps Bunyip Cover art by Richard Saunders Editorial ISSN 0726-9897 Editor Barry Williams Contributing Editors Tim Mendham To Be a Skeptic Steve Roberts Technology Consultants Richard Saunders Eran Segev The prominent use of the word have good evidence of their own to Chief Investigator ‘sceptic/skeptic’ in the media, often support their conclusion. Ian Bryce in association with rather peculiar Personally I believe that the case ideas, has caused some to question for HIV causing AIDS has been All correspondence to: whether we should consider chang- established but as, like the majority Australian Skeptics Inc ing the name of our organisation. I of Skeptics, I have no qualifications PO Box 268 would argue that skepticism is a in medical or biological sciences, my Roseville NSW 2069 Australia very useful rational mental tool belief is not grounded in any deep (ABN 90 613 095 379 ) under any circumstance, even when understanding of the science in- the position one espouses is ulti- volved. It comes about for a variety Contact Details mately untenable; I would further of reasons; the mounting evidence in Tel: (02) 9417 2071 argue that skepticism is no less favour of the hypothesis, the ad- Fax: (02) 9417 7930 e-mails: [email protected] important when one’s views are vances made in treatment of the [email protected] strongly supported by the evidence. disease, but probably most power- One example of the use of ‘sceptic’ fully because I am more likely to Web Pages was in relation to a South Austral- favour the views of people whose Australian Skeptics ian court appeal by a man who had expertise I have come to respect (Sir www.skeptics.com.au No Answers in Genesis™ been convicted of wilfully infecting Gus Nossal, for instance), rather http://home.austarnet.com.au/stear/default.htm women with HIV/AIDS. The defence than people of whom I have never called two witnesses who asserted heard. That’s a natural reaction, but the Skeptic is a journal of fact and opinion, published that there was no evidence that HIV it’s not particularly skeptical. We all, four times per year by Australian Skeptics Inc. Views caused AIDS, or even that the virus even Skeptics, have our own preju- and opinions expressed in articles and letters in the existed — they were described in the dices. Skeptic are those of the authors, and are not necessar- ily those of Australian Skeptics Inc. Articles may be re- press (and by themselves) as “HIV We should, of course, be skeptical printed with permission and with due acknowledgement sceptics”. Arrayed against them was of accepting propositions based to the Skeptic. a battery of highly qualified experts purely on ‘consensus’, even if it is a consensus of the best minds in the Editorial consultants: who exposed their claims to critical scrutiny and who questioned their field at any moment. I have little Dr Stephen Basser (medicine) expertise. At press time the case has doubt that the consensus among Dr Trevor Case (psychology) Dr Richard Gordon (medicine) not been decided. physicists in the late 19th Century Dr Pete Griffith (biochemistry/microbiology) Dr William Grey (philosophy) It would not be at all surprising if would have been that “everything to Prof Colin Groves (anthropology) many of the things presently ‘known’ be discovered has been discovered”, Mr Martin Hadley (law) Dr Colin Keay (astronomy) about HIV and AIDS were later yet a few short years into the new Dr Mark Newbrook (linguistics) found to be in error, and one would century Max Planck, Albert Ein- Dr Andrew Parle (physics) Prof Ian Plimer (geology) expect that the scientists doing the stein, et al showed that the surface Dr Stephen Moston (psychology) Dr Alex Ritchie (palaeontology) research would apply the tool of of discovery had barely been Dr Steve Roberts (chemistry) skepticism to their own work, for scratched. Mr Roland Seidel (mathematics) that is the way science progresses. Closer to home, for much of the Branch correspondents: While the people who deny any latter half of the 20th Century the association between the virus and consensus about causes of stomach ACT: Dr Pete Griffith Gold Coast: Mr John Stear the disease are entitled to be skepti- and intestinal ulcers was that they Hunter: Dr Colin Keay cal that the connection has been were caused by stress, excessive acid Qld: Mr Bob Bruce SA: Mr Allan Lang established, they are not entitled to and other life style factors, and the Tas: Mr Fred Thornett conclude that there is no such disease was treated accordingly. Vic: Mr Ken Greatorex WA: Dr Geoffrey Dean association, at least unless they Barry Marshall and Robin Warren of Page 4 - the Skeptic, Autumn 2007 Perth were skeptical of this consen- tion at large and the media, means Skeptics Around Australia sus and their long and detailed that there is a temptation to rely on research showed that the bacterium spin and hype to sell the message. Helicobacter pylori played a key role Regrettably this often results in New South Wales in the development of these ulcers. reputable scientists (and other Australian Skeptics Inc For their discovery they were experts) impugning the motives or PO Box 268, Roseville NSW 2069 awarded the 2006 Nobel Prize in questioning the bona fides of equally Tel: (02) 9417 2071 Fax: (02) 9417 7930 Medicine. reputable scientists who disagree [email protected] It would be a mistake, however, to with them on their conclusions. We Hunter Skeptics think that simply being skeptical of have all seen charges that scientists PO Box 166 , Waratah NSW 2298 the consensus is sufficient to have are ‘toeing the party line’ to ensure Tel: (02) 4957 8666. Fax: (02) 4952 6442 your ideas proven correct (they continuing funding, or being ‘in the didn’t all laugh at Galileo). In most pay of big oil’ to disparage the Victoria cases consensus opinions are closer findings. There might well be cases Australian Skeptics (Vic) Inc to the truth than those of their of each, but it is by no means univer- GPO Box 5166AA, Melbourne VIC 3001 critics, but in the end it is evidence sal on either side and we would do Tel: 1 800 666 996 that proves a scientific proposition, well to recognise that. [email protected] not popularity. That there are genuine scientific That brings us to a current major disagreements regarding many of Borderline Skeptics issue that goes under the broad the issues encompassed by this PO Box 17 , Mitta Mitta VIC 3701 Tel:(02)60723632 heading of ‘Climate Change’. This is whole debate should come as a [email protected] not a single problem at all, but a surprise to no one. Science hierarchy of highly complex and progresses precisely because differ- Queensland related issues, the solutions to which ent people have different perspec- Queensland Skeptics Assn Inc are not simply a matter for any tives, but we should also recognise PO Box 6454 , Fairfield Gardens QLD 4103 particular scientific discipline, nor that scientists, like everyone else, Tel (07) 3255 0499 even in some cases, for science at all. have their own prejudices and not [email protected] Partly this arises from the many and everything they do or think is various issues involved: ‘scientific’. In the end, as always, it Gold Coast Skeptics • Is the globe warming and if so, is the evidence, not the spin, that PO Box 8348, GCMC Bundall QLD 9726 by how much? will decides the case. Tel: (07) 5593 1882 Fax: (07) 5593 2776 [email protected] • Are human activities a (or the) Above all we should beware of major contributing factor? falling for any ‘One True Answer’; in ACT the past, that sort of thing has led to • What part do naturally occurring Canberra Skeptics the Inquisition, Auschwitz, the events, or cyclical factors play? PO Box 555, Civic Square ACT 2608 Gulag and equally horrible ‘Final (02) 6231 5406 or 6296 4555 • What are the short- and long- Solutions’. [email protected] term effects? In all it is safer by far to be a • What can be done about it? Skeptic. South Australia A vital and contentious topic, Skeptics SA PO Box 377 , Rundle Mall SA 5000 bound to affect us all, it involves Changes Tel: (08) 8272 5881 many experts in many different We hope you find the improvements [email protected] fields, so how can we lay people in the appearance of the Skeptic to know who is telling us the truth? your taste. We thank the many Western Australia None of us has the time, nor the subscribers who offered suggestions WA Skeptics desire, to become expert in all the for improvement, and in particular PO Box 431, Scarborough WA 6922 disparate disciplines necessary to our gratitude to Tim and Hilda Tel: (08) 9448 8458 understand the problems, let alone Mendham, Guy Burns, Richard [email protected] the solutions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Amazing Meeting 5
    The Amazing Meeting 5 Per Johan Råsmark James Randi är känd för de flesta skeptiker. Det finns knappast någon som inte vid något till- fälle i en diskussion nämnt hans utmaning, där den som kan visa upp en paranormal förmåga under kontrollerbara former kan få $ 1 000 000. För knappt ett år sedan var vi nära att förlora honom då han drabbades av en allvarlig hjärtattack, men tack vare modern medicinsk veten- skap överlevde han. Den 18 januari 2007 var han så närvarande när det femte ”The Amazing Meeting” (TMA) inleddes i Las Vegas. Dessa möten, av vilka det första hölls i Florida och de övriga har varit i Las Vegas, arrangeras av ”James Randi Educational Foundation” (JREF). Denna gång hölls konferensen på Riviera eftersom Stardust där man varit de två senaste åren håller på att för- vandlas till enbart ”dust” i den ständiga omvandlingen av staden. Konferensen har hela tiden ökat i popularitet och detta år tyckte drygt 800 personer att det var värt att resa till ett kallt Las Vegas. Enligt arrangörerna gör detta konferensen till världens största någonsin för skeptiker och det ska också vara den med procentuellt sett flest kvinnor och flest ungdomar. (För att vara sunt skeptisk vill jag påpeka att jag inte har kontrollerat de uppgifterna.) Temat för årets möte var ”Skepticism and the Media”, något som inte alla talarna höll sig till eftersom det är en stor konferens, men som kunde ses på antalet mediepersonligheter bland de inbjudna gästerna. Att man inte helt höll sig till konferensens tema märktes redan den första dagen som inled- des med två workshops.
    [Show full text]
  • When Entertainment Meets Science: Summit Boosts Innovative Education JAMES UNDERDOWN
    SI May June 11 CUT_SI new design masters 3/25/11 10:01 AM Page 5 [ NEWS AND COMMENT When Entertainment Meets Science: Summit Boosts Innovative Education JAMES UNDERDOWN Can the entertainment media, with their formidable skills, help educate young people about science? That was just one of the hopes as the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) hosted the unusual Summit on Science, En ter - tainment, and Education at the Paley Center for Media in Beverly Hills, Cal- ifornia, on February 4, 2011. The all-day symposium featured a top- shelf lineup of speakers from all over the United States on the status and direction of science education today. Each of its From left: Superstring theorist Brian Greene, writer/director/producer Jerry Zucker, and educator Tyler Johnstone three categories (science, entertainment, discuss ways to attract students to the world of science. and education) was well represented by in- novators in their respective fields with rel- her students to testify how they are drawn tainment who need help with content. evant knowledge and experience. toward science. In this day and age of Thanks to a $225,000 grant from the From the world of science, luminaries myriad distractions, catching the eye of Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, such as Ralph Cicerone, NAS president; students is more of a challenge than ever. the Ex change “is seeking proposals to es- Sean B. Carroll, biologist; and Charles But the program didn’t begin and end tablish collaborative partnerships among Vest, president of the National Academy with a group of experts bemoaning the scientists, entertainment industry profes- of Engineering and president emeritus of failures of the education system and sionals, and educators to develop educa- the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pointing fingers at Hollywood schlock tional products or services that effectively were present.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Report on Bial Fellowship 36/08 Theoretical Background
    Scientific Report on Bial Fellowship 36/08 Theoretical background and study overview In sympathetic magical belief, objects are deemed to possess an affinity of power through their resemblance or connection to individuals by the ‘Law of Similarity’ (Frazer, 1922). Early belief in these laws underpin folk herbal remedies, alchemy and voodoo witchcraft, but also trigger magical notions in modern scientifically literate adults (e.g. Rozin & Nemeroff, 1990). One of the most dramatic examples of belief in sympathetic magic is the concern that damage to a representation can somehow harm the real-world person or object it is representing (Behrand, 2003). In our pilot studies, we have demonstrated that adults who do not think that they will be upset by cutting up a photograph of their childhood sentimental object will show significantly elevated arousal as measured by their galvanic skin response. Following the destruction they reported no awareness of increased arousal. This suggests that there may be latent emotional responses to perceived destruction that are suppressed. We predict that this reflects suppression of amygdala fear activation by inhibitory dorsal-lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPC) networks. The rationale for this frontal inhibitory effect is the recent demonstration that activation of the DLPC and anterior cingulate is associated with unwanted prejudicial responses to Black faces by White participants (Richeson et al, 2003; Cunningham et al, 2004). These studies on prejudice are consistent with the idea that it is possible to control spontaneously activated negative attitudes. The current body of work examined whether the same network might be implicated in sympathetic magical reasoning. Sixty-seventy percent of Western children form a strong emotional attachment to a specific toy which they then treat as invaluable and irreplaceable (Lehman et al., 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • From the Editor Skep Ti Cal Inq Uir E R™ the MAG a ZINE for SCI ENCE and REA SON
    SI Sept/Oct pgs_SI MJ 2010 7/23/10 12:41 PM Page 4 From the Editor Skep ti cal In quir e r™ THE MAG A ZINE FOR SCI ENCE AND REA SON ED I TOR Kend rick Fra zi er ED I TO RI AL BOARD James E. Al cock Martin Gardner and the Skeptical Movement Today Thom as Cas ten Ray Hy man Joe Nick ell Am ar deo Sar ma artin Gardner’s passing and the latest successful skeptic’s conference are both causes for Benjamin Wolozin Mreflection on where the skeptical movement Gardner helped found stands now. CON SULT ING ED I TORS I begin these comments as I depart The Amazing Meeting 8 (TAM8), the James Randi Sus an J. Black more Ken neth L. Fed er Educational Foundation’s big skeptics conference in Las Vegas. Martin Gardner’s legacy was much Barry Karr in evidence, and indeed Gardner received a moving tribute from Randi at the beginning of a late- E. C. Krupp Scott O. Lil i en feld afternoon panel on the origin of the skeptics movement. Randi, Ray Hyman, and Paul Kurtz— Da vid F. Marks three giants who, with Gardner, were present at the beginning—and I talked about the events that Jay M. Pasachoff Eu ge nie Scott led to the creation of CSICOP (now our Committee for Skeptical Inquiry) in 1976. Ray’s, Randi’s, Rich ard Wis e man and Paul’s reminiscences also lead off this special Martin Gardner Tribute Issue of the SKEPTICAL CON TRIB UT ING ED I TORS INQUIRER , pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Jennifer Forester, Faculty Mentor
    Pics or It Didn’t Happen: Sexist Hyperskepticism in the Modern Skeptical Movement Author: Jennifer Forester, Faculty Mentor: Clark Pomerleau, Ph.D., Department of English, College of Arts and Sciences Department and College Affiliation: Department of English, College of Arts and Sciences Pics or It Didn’t Happen 2 Bio: Jennifer Forester graduated summa cum laude from the University of North Texas with a bachelor’s degree in English with a specialization in writing and rhetoric. Jennifer was a member of the Honors College. She presented her research at University Scholars Day in April 19, 2013. She is proud of her service in the United States Marine Corps where she was a Corporal (Bandsman, Armorer) in Cherry Point, North Carolina. She is a mother of two brilliant, if often unruly, children. Her current plan is to find gainful employment, but promises that she will eventually return to college and obtain her doctorate in rhetoric with a particular focus on the ways that rhetorical studies can be applied to social justice. Pics or It Didn’t Happen 3 Abstract: In the skeptical community, there is an ongoing conflict over what—if any—actions are necessary to make the movement more welcoming to the growing numbers of women in its ranks. This conflict has brought a great deal of antifeminist sentiment to the surface, to include rape and death threats against prominent women who speak affirmatively on feminist issues within organized skepticism. The origins of this problem can be found in the grounding of skeptical dialogue on the superiority of a traditionally masculinized ideal of science and reason, which excludes the feminized personal narratives that serve as evidence for mistreatment of women within the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Atheist: Set XVI
    1 2 In-Sight Publishing 3 Canadian Atheist: Set XVI 4 IN-SIGHT PUBLISHING Publisher since 2014 Published and distributed by In-Sight Publishing Fort Langley, British Columbia, Canada www.in-sightjournal.com Copyright © 2020 by Scott Douglas Jacobsen In-Sight Publishing established in 2014 as a not-for-profit alternative to the large commercial publishing houses who dominate the publishing industry. In-Sight Publishing operates in independent and public interests rather than in dependent and private ones, and remains committed to publishing innovative projects for free or low-cost while electronic and easily accessible for public domain consumption within communal, cultural, educational, moral, personal, scientific, and social values, sometimes or even often, deemed insufficient drivers based on understandable profit objectives. Thank you for the download of this ebook, your consumption, effort, interest, and time support independent and public publishing purposed for the encouragement and support of academic inquiry, creativity, diverse voices, freedom of expression, independent thought, intellectual freedom, and novel ideas. © 2014-2020 by Scott Douglas Jacobsen. All rights reserved. Original appearance in Canadian Atheist. Not a member or members of In-Sight Publishing, 2020 This first edition published in 2020 No parts of this collection may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized, in any form, or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented or created, which includes photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher or the individual co-author(s) or place of publication of individual articles. Independent Cataloguing-in-Publication Data No official catalogue record for this book, as an independent endeavour.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Do We Go from Here? Has Classic Skepticism Run Its Course? by Daniel Loxton, 2007
    Where Do We Go From here? Has classic skepticism run its course? by Daniel Loxton, 2007 antasy and sci-fi fans may recall an Emmy organizations to whom media could turn; they Award-nominated musical episode of the television published an extensive body of literature probing Fseries Buffy the Vampire Slayer, in which the heroes the validity of pseudoscientific assertions; they sadly sing lyrics posing the key existential question: engaged in watchdog activism; they tracked the evolution of claims and contributed to the scientific The battle’s done, and we kinda won understanding of belief and anomalous experience. So we sound our victory cheer. Where do we go from here?1 This took no small effort. Skeptical leaders like Randi, Kurtz and Shermer have racked up heroic mileage, and Looking around the skeptics movement over the no shortage of bumps and bruises along the way. And, for last few years, it’s seemed to me that everyone some skeptical trailblazers, at long last, the battle’s finally is asking this same question. I’d like to suggest done. Some of the early titans, like Martin Gardener, have an answer: we should return to basics. retired. Others, like Asimov and Sagan, have passed away. When skeptics first organized, the landscape was in some Still others are just sick of this crap. ways very different. Pseudoscientific fads that have since faded back somewhat into the fringe — from Uri Geller to After all, in a world where Peter Popoff can once again flying saucers to Von Däniken’s ancient astronauts — were make a sweet fortune performing miracles — Popoff, for then sweeping the culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Autism, Cults Young Skeptics & the Right Approach
    SKEPTICI S M . SCIENCE . SOCIETY Vol. 30, No 3. September 2010 tics kep eak S p S AUTISM, CULTS young SKEPTICS & the right approach FAITH HEALING j GALILEO j ASTROLOGY Australian Skeptics . www.skeptics.com.au Skeptic_Cover_Sep10.indd 1 3/9/10 9:45:40 AM The Skeptic September 10 Skeptical Groups in Australia Australian Skeptics Inc – Eran Segev Queensland Skeptics Association Inc – Bob Bruce www.skeptics.com.au PO Box 1388 Coorparoo DC 4151 PO Box 20, Beecroft, NSW 2119 Tel: (07) 3255 0499 Mob: 0419 778 308 [email protected] Tel: 02 8094 1894; Mob: 0432 713 195; Fax: (02) 8088 4735 Hear Bob on 4BC Paranormal Panel - 9-10pm Tuesdays [email protected] Sydney Skeptics in the Pub – 6pm first Thursday of each Meeting with guest speaker on the last Monday of every month month at the City Hotel, corner of Kent & King Streets at the Red Brick Hotel, 81 Annerly Road, South Brisbane. Dinner in the city (meeting upstairs) from 6pm, speaker at 7.30pm. See our web site for details: www.qldskeptics.com Dinner meetings are held on a regular basis in Chatswood Next dinner: Sept 25 - guest speaker business analyst John Smyrk. Bookings online or contact [email protected] Canberra Skeptics – Michael O’Rourke & Pierre Le Count PO Box 555, Civic Square, ACT 2608 Tel: (02) 6121 4483 [email protected] (general inquiries), Hunter Skeptics Inc – John Turner [email protected] (Canberra Skeptics in the Pub). Tel: (02) 4959 6286 [email protected] Monthly talks usually take place on the 13th of each month at We produce a 4-page e-newsletter six times a year; contact the the Innovations Theatre at the ANU.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE: Lawrence M. Krauss Born: May 27, 1954
    CURRICULUM VITAE: Lawrence M. Krauss Born: May 27, 1954; New York City Citizenship: U.S.A., Canada Married: 1980-2012 to Katherine Kelley 2014- to Nancy Dahl Children: Lillian, born Nov. 23, 1984 Santal (step-daughter), born Aug. 14, 2000 Current Address and Position: Foundation Professor, Director, Origins Project Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative School of Earth and Space Exploration and Department of Physics Arizona State University PO Box 871404, Tempe AZ 85287-1404 Research office: 480-965-6378 Email: [email protected] Education B.Sc. First Class Honours, Mathematics and Physics Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, 1977 Ph.D. Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982 Honorary Degrees and Fellowships: 1998 Fellow, American Physical Society 2001 Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of Science 2003 D.Sc. Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada Employment: Teaching and Research (since 1982) 1982-85 Junior Fellow, Harvard Society of Fellows, and Physics Dept., Harvard University 1985-88 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Physics, Yale University 1985-86 Visiting Scientist, Boston University 1985-89 Visiting Scientist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 1986-88 Assistant Professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Yale University 1988-93 Associate Professor, Departments of Physics and Astronomy, Yale University 1993- 2008 Ambrose Swasey Professor of Physics and Astronomy and chair (thru 2005), Dept. of Physics, Case Western Reserve University 2005 Director, Office of Science, Public Policy, and Bio- Entrepreneurship, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine 2002-2008 Director, Center for Education and Research in Cosmology and Astrophysics 2006-7 Visiting Professor, Vanderbilt University 2008- Foundation Professor, School of Earth and Space Exploration & Physics Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • CFI Calls on FDA to Label Homeopathic Drugs As Untested and Unproven
    [ NEWS AND COMMENT CFI Calls on FDA to Label Homeopathic Drugs as Untested and Unproven Consumers spend $3 billion a year on homeopathic drugs, yet most remain unaware that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not evalu- ated them for safety and effectiveness. In comments filed with the FDA the week of August 17, the Center for Inquiry (CFI) urged the FDA to sub- ject homeopathic drugs to the same testing requirements as conventional drugs. Failing that, CFI urged the FDA to at least require homeopathic prod- ucts to be clearly labeled as untested and unproven. Homeopathy is a centuries-old pseudoscience, developed before the discovery of disease-causing pathogens, based on the false beliefs that “like cures like” and that the more an ingredient is diluted the more potent it is, due to water’s “memory” of the diluted ingre- for not distinguishing between effec- tive remedies and pseudoscience Homeopathy is a centuries-old dient. As CFI stated in its comments, from the 1700s if both products “By its own definition, homeopathy share the same store shelves, and pseudoscience, developed cannot work.” Yet for historical reasons there is no labeling on homeopathic relating to the passage of the original drugs to indicate they are given a before the discovery of Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1938 pass by the FDA. Clear labeling on disease-causing pathogens. (which had a homeopathic practitioner homeopathic products, that catches consumers’ attention and informs as a key sponsor), homeopathic prod- them that the FDA does not evalu- can result in people becoming sicker or ucts can be marketed even though they ate these products for safety or effec- even dying for lack of real, scientifically are not subject to the rigorous testing tiveness, is an easy way to ensure that for safety and effectiveness that conven- people looking to treat their illnesses proven treatments.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Why-Is-There-A-Skeptical-Movement.Pdf, 66
    URI GELLER AND THE RECEPTION OF PARAPSYCHOLOGY IN THE 1970S by JACOB OLDER GREEN B.A. The University of Chicago, 2009 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) July, 2018 © Jacob Older Green, 2018 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the thesis entitled: URI GELLER AND THE RECEPTION OF PARAPSYCHOLOGY IN THE 1970S submitted by Jacob Older Green in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Examining Committee: Joy Dixon, History Supervisor Robert Brain, History Supervisory Committee Member Alexei Kojevnikov Additional Examiner ii Abstract This paper investigates the controversy following the publication of work by scientists working at the Stanford Research Institute that claimed to show that the extraordinary mental powers of 1970s super psychic Uri Geller were real. The thesis argues that the controversy around Geller represented a shift in how skeptical scientists treated parapsychology. Instead of engaging with parapsychology and treating it as an incipient, if unpromising scientific discipline, which had been the norm since the pioneering work of J.B. Rhine in the 1930s, parapsychology's critics portrayed the discipline as a pseudoscience, little more than an attempt by credulous scientists to confirm their superstitious belief in occult psychic powers. The controversy around Geller also led to the creation of The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP), one of the first skeptical organizations specializing in investigating supposed instances of paranormal phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth System Science Center (ESSC)
    Renewal Proposal for the Penn State Earth System Science Center, 2020 1. Name of Center: Earth System Science Center (ESSC) 2. Director: Michael E. Mann, Distinguished Professor of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science with joint appointments in EESI and Department of Geosciences (CV attached) 3. Participants: There are currently 23 faculty and research staff affiliates of the ESSC as listed below: Director: Michael Mann (Dept. of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science; joint appointments in Dept. of Geosciences and EESI) Associate Director: Daniel J. Brouillette (Dept. of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science) Affiliates: Richard Alley (Dept. of Geosciences) Sridhar Anandakrishnan (Dept. of Geosciences) Timothy Bralower (Dept. of Geosciences) Robert Crane (Dept. of Geography/AESEDA) Ken Davis (Dept. of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science) Jenni Evans (Dept. of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science; Director, Institute for CyberScience) Steve Feldstein (Dept. of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, EESI) Chris Forest (Dept. of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science) Kate Freeman (Dept. of Geosciences) José Fuentes (Dept. of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science) Bernd Haupt (EESI) Gregory Jenkins (Dept. of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science) Jim Kasting (Dept. of Geosciences) Klaus Keller (Dept. of Geosciences) Lee Kump (Dept. of Geosciences) Sukyoung Lee (Dept. of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science) Paul Markowski (Dept. of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science) Ray Najjar (Dept. of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science) David Pollard (EESI) Yvette Richardson (Dept. of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science) Tim White (EESI) 4. Rationale for Center: The Penn State Earth System Science Center (ESSC) serves to nurture, develop, and publicize Penn State’s historic strength in the area of earth-system science. ESSC interests emphasize climate dynamics, paleoclimate, climate-change research, and public outreach and education.
    [Show full text]